Kamala won California by 3.1 million votes…..or did she?

[Coach is Back!]

https://x.com/shilohmarx/status/1955451724094935483?s=46

Kamala won California by 3.1 million votes

California reported to Congress 3.1 million removals

17,425 is the exact difference

This was fraud.

Congress and DOJ need to act.

[Primemuscle]

https://x.com/shilohmarx/status/1955451724094935483?s=46

Kamala won California by 3.1 million votes

California reported to Congress 3.1 million removals

17,425 is the exact difference

This was fraud.

Congress and DOJ need to act.

Nice copy and paste work, Coach. You did not change one word of Shilo Marx's post on X.

If Congress and the DOJ did act on this, they would look like complete idiots. Apparently, Shilo Marx does not understand what "election removals" means. It is the process of removing voters from the voter registration rolls, (voter purging). The purpose of this process is to update voter registration by removing outdated or ineligible registrants.

California voter registration lists are continually updated and purged to maintain accuracy. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that 3.1 million non-registered voters voted for any of the candidates in the 2024 election. 

A 'voter' is removed from voter registration because:

* The voter has died.
* The voter has changed their residence to an address outside the relevant voting district.
* The voter explicitly requests their removal from the registration list.
* State law may dictate that individuals with a felony conviction or who have been adjudicated as mentally incapacitated are ineligible to vote.
* Inactive voters are those who have not voted in two Federal elections.

If you have been removed from voter registration, in order to vote in future elections, you must be qualified to and reregister, otherwise you will not receive a ballot.

Nonregistered voters' votes are not counted.

This is a link for more information about voter registration in California, https://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/voter-registration/nvra/laws-standards/nvra-manual/chap-4 
And if you have time and are interested, check out the entire immigration act: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-1376/pdf/COMPS-1376.pdf   

[Humble Narcissist]

If Democrats aren't lying and cheating it must not be an election year.

[Coach is Back!]

If Democrats aren't lying and cheating it must not be an election year.

This is 100% true

[Primemuscle]

If Democrats aren't lying and cheating it must not be an election year.

Then Democrats are not cheating or lying now because 2025 is not an election year.

[Coach is Back!]

Then Democrats are not cheating or lying now because 2025 is not an election year.

The lefts lying and propaganda doesn't take a break. It's election year right from the ending of the previous one. They're doing the exact same thing they're doing when they got destroyed in last one in preparation for the midterms. I've said this a thousand times. At this point they have nothing...LITERALLY nothing run on. Zip, zilch, nnnaaadaaa

[illuminati]

The left lying and propaganda doesn't take a break. It's election year right from the ending of the previous one. They're doing the exact same thing they're doing when they got destroyed in last one in preparation for the midterms. I've said this a thousand times. At this point they have nothing...LITERALLY nothing run on. Zip, zilch, nnnaaadaaa

Prime will obviously disagree - yet not be able to give one positive example.   

[Coach is Back!]

Prime will obviously disagree - yet not be able to give one positive example.   

He'll google something from leftist propaganda rag and prove my point without even realizing it

[Primemuscle]

The left lying and propaganda doesn't take a break. It's election year right from the ending of the previous one. They're doing the exact same thing they're doing when they got destroyed in last one in preparation for the midterms. I've said this a thousand times. At this point they have nothing...LITERALLY nothing run on. Zip, zilch, nnnaaadaaa

Of course anything could happen with the midterm elections, but we often see the president's party lose seats in Congress. And the president's opposing party gain control of one or both houses of Congress.

In the 2018 midterm elections the Democrats won control of the House but lost the Senate. In the 2022 elections, Republicans won the House. However, Democrats won the Senate.

The only reason Republicans are trying to gerrymander in Texas is to gain seats. Other Red states will likely follow suit. And the the blue states will probably fight back. 
.

[Primemuscle]

He'll google something from leftist propaganda rag and prove my point without even realizing it

While I Google for information you rely on Breitbart, and it is generally held that while Google leans left, Breitbart is at the extreme right.

[Coach is Back!]

Of course anything could happen with the midterm elections, but we often see the president's party lose seats in Congress. And the president's opposing party gain control of one or both houses of Congress.

In the 2018 midterm elections the Democrats won control of the House but lost the Senate. In the 2022 elections, Republicans won the House. However, Democrats won the Senate.

The only reason Republicans are trying to gerrymander in Texas is to gain seats. Other Red states will likely follow suit. And the the blue states will probably fight back. 
.

Anything could happen, but it won't this time. You can't compare either one of election cycles to what's going today. In 2018 Paul Ryan was speaker of the house and fought Trump every step of the way mostly siding with the Dems. Trump was fighting corruption on both sides. In 2022, Pelosi was speaker house, Biden was President and elections that Republicans were ahead and should won, were miraculously were overturned weeks and months later in recounts. Btw, the redrawing of districts is legal in Texas especially when Dems bail on their constituents to another blue state where gerrymandering is the norm.

[Coach is Back!]

While I Google for information you rely on Breitbart, and it is generally held that while Google leans left, Breitbart is at the extreme right.

I don't recall Breitbart falling into and driving false narratives like "Russian Collusion".

[Primemuscle]

I don't recall Breitbart falling into and driving false narratives like "Russian Collusion".

Of course you don't.

In a 2017 survey among US readers, Breitbart News was voted the third least trustworthy ...

[Coach is Back!]

Of course you don't.

In a 2017 survey among US readers, Breitbart News was voted the third least trustworthy ...

Did they or did they not push the fake Russian collusion narrative (as an example) or not?

[Primemuscle]

Did they or did they not push the fake Russian collusion narrative (as an example) or not?

Your post is unclear to me. By 'they', do you mean Breitbart? And by 'fake' you must mean that Breitbart's contention was and is that the Russian collusion narrative was fake. If so, why wouldn't they? Maga conservatives and their leader still insist it was fake and these are the folks who subscribe to Breitbart, much as you do.

[Moontrane]

While I Google for information you rely on Breitbart, and it is generally held that while Google leans left, Breitbart is at the extreme right.

Google leans hard left, my friend.  Ask it how many draft deferments John Kerry requested.  Ignore the AI response, which doesn’t answer the question.

Why would google obscure the answer?

Google will, though, give you hits on Bush’s, Trump’s, and Cheney’s deferments for the above question.  Why?  What the heck do these three have to do with a question about Kerry's deferments?

I learned how many from google 21 years ago, when it was the bee's knees, the cat's meow.  Now it's a leftist propoganda machine. 

[chaos]

While I Google for information you rely on Breitbart, and it is generally held that while Google leans left, Breitbart is at the extreme right.

Leans left....

[Coach is Back!]

Your post is unclear to me. By 'they', do you mean Breitbart? And by 'fake' you must mean that Breitbart's contention was and is that the Russian collusion narrative was fake. If so, why wouldn't they? Maga conservatives and their leader still insist it was fake and these are the folks who subscribe to Breitbart, much as you do.

I’m not in the mood to play this bullshit game with you. The history of left eft leaning rags is basically communist propaganda. The history of conservative media is to prove the left wrong….which they have. Play stupid some more

[illuminati]

I’m not in the mood to play this bullshit game with you. The history of left eft leaning rags is basically communist propaganda. The history of conservative media is to prove the left wrong….which they have. Play stupid some more

It's quite sad & pathetic to see him playing these childish word games more
& more     Play stupid or deliberately forgetful is all he does now.

[Primemuscle]

Google leans hard left, my friend.  Ask it how many draft deferments John Kerry requested.  Ignore the AI response, which doesn’t answer the question.

Why would google obscure the answer?

Google will, though, give you hits on Bush’s, Trump’s, and Cheney’s deferments for the above question.  Why?  What the heck do these three have to do with a question about Kerry's deferments?

I learned how many from google 21 years ago, when it was the bee's knees, the cat's meow.  Now it's a leftist propoganda machine.

Googling how many draft deferments John Kerry, et al requested brings up 10 pages of multiple supposedly related resources. Why would read all of these when I don't give a rat's ass about their or anyone else's requests for draft deferments? In 1966 I was notified to register for the draft, I got a permanent deferment because I had asthma. -just a little more serious than bone spurs, (plantar fasciitis). LOL!