Nice non-sequitur I said soft sciences and if you think they're just fine you're either willfully ignorant or irretrievably stupid. I'm not anti-intellectual but I'm not blind either. The soft sciences are compromised by ideologues and have been for about 4 decades or more. Peter Boghossian exposed what gets published what doesn't and why.
I knew you would try this as youre a lightweight. You actually said all science is tainted as are the studies and my belief in them (especially the soft sciences)...
so no you did not imply just soft sciences and what I said was not a non-sequitor as my statement did follow from yours. This tactic might work on morons, so nice try.
Boghossian did not expose what you are claiming he did, his initial attempt was to shitty journals outside of the filed in question, the second run was more damaging but again its in the fucking world of gender studies which I think is retarded and frankly new.
Psychology, philosophy, anthropology and sociology are all legitimate practices with ample research.