Gleeful school teachers celebrate Charlie Kirk assassination...

[IroNat]

Demented whacked libtards.

https://nypost.com/2025/09/11/us-news/gleeful-school-teachers-celebrate-assassination-of-charlie-kirk-in-horrific-posts/

[Grape Ape]

These are the people teaching children.

[IroNat]

These are the people teaching children.

Encountered many teachers in one of my early jobs and they are quite stupid for the most part.
Becoming a teacher, particularly elementary, is one of the easiest college majors.

[Humble Narcissist]

These are the people teaching children.

Parents should demand their dismissal regardless of party.

[Skeletor]

https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1966520778276389196

I haven't seen any leftists celebrating Charlie Kirks murder.

[chaos]

https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1966520778276389196

I haven't seen any leftists celebrating Charlie Kirks murder. Where do you see these folks?

According to Reuters, Right-wing anger surges as Kirk’s killing fuels calls for vengeance

This quote from prime is a perfect example of how the left supports each other no matter what. He knows people are celebrating Charlie Kirks murder and we all know he's seen their videos, yet he denies it, protecting their disgusting behavior and as a matter of fact, in that same post he is actually trying to shift attention to the right by claiming their anger is surging.

[Primemuscle]

https://x.com/tomselliott/status/1966520778276389196

Now thanks to you, I have now seen this video of some idiots who are celebrating Charlie Kirk's death. I read that Charlie Kirk's audience was mainly comprised of folks in their teens and early twenties. Based on that video, so were his enemies in that age group. Nothing about those freaks or their remarks resemble any left-leaning folk I have met or known.

Not ever having heard of Tom Elliot, I wondered where and how he found these kids celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination. Then I found a NY Times article written on September 12 with the headline, 'Right-Wing Activists Urge Followers to Expose Those Celebrating Kirk Killing." https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/12/us/politics/charlie-kirk-shooting-firings-celebration.html. This is an extremely odd and inappropriate way to morn Charlie Kirk.

Although I had never heard of Charlie Kirk before his brutal assassination, my first thoughts were for his wife and kids and their anguish over the loss of him.

[chaos]

Now thanks to you, I have now seen this video of some idiots who are celebrating Charlie Kirk's death. I read that Charlie Kirk's audience was mainly comprised of folks in their teens and early twenties. Based on that video, so were his enemies in that age group. Nothing about those freaks or their remarks resemble any left-leaning folk I have met or known.

Not ever having heard of Tom Elliot, I wondered where and how he found these kids celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination. Then I found a NY Times article written on September 12 with the headline, 'Right-Wing Activists Urge Followers to Expose Those Celebrating Kirk Killing." https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/12/us/politics/charlie-kirk-shooting-firings-celebration.html. This is an extremely odd and inappropriate way to morn Charlie Kirk.

Although I had never heard of Charlie Kirk before his brutal assassination, my first thoughts were for his wife and kids and their anguish over the loss of him.

IF that were true, it exposes how closed off into your liberal echo chamber bubble you really are.

[Primemuscle]

IF that were true, it exposes how closed off into your liberal echo chamber bubble you really are.

This is absolutely true. So what? Charlie Kirks primary audience was made up of extremely partisan people in their teens and twenties, why would I have heard or know about him? I wonder, do you ever watch CNN, read the NY Times or Washington Post, all of which are considered left-bias and none of which are extreme-left, as many believe Charlie Kirk was extreme-right.

[IroNat]

Far-Left New Republic Urges Democrats: Shun Empathy After Kirk Assassination — Be ‘Callous, Short of Cruel’

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/09/14/new-republic-urges-democrats-shun-empathy-kirk-assassination/

[Dos Equis]

Now thanks to you, I have now seen this video of some idiots who are celebrating Charlie Kirk's death. I read that Charlie Kirk's audience was mainly comprised of folks in their teens and early twenties. Based on that video, so were his enemies in that age group. Nothing about those freaks or their remarks resemble any left-leaning folk I have met or known.

Not ever having heard of Tom Elliot, I wondered where and how he found these kids celebrating Charlie Kirk's assassination. Then I found a NY Times article written on September 12 with the headline, 'Right-Wing Activists Urge Followers to Expose Those Celebrating Kirk Killing." https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/12/us/politics/charlie-kirk-shooting-firings-celebration.html. This is an extremely odd and inappropriate way to morn Charlie Kirk.

Although I had never heard of Charlie Kirk before his brutal assassination, my first thoughts were for his wife and kids and their anguish over the loss of him.

Doesn't surprise me that you had never heard of Charlie Kirk.  He was only the single most influential person responsible for Trump's election in 2024 other than Elon Musk.

And it wasn't just a handful of leftists celebrating and justifying his murder.  It was people, young and old, educated and uneducated, professionals, etc.  Tons of people.  The left is full of intolerant, violent zealots. 

[Dos Equis]

This is absolutely true. So what? Charlie Kirks primary audience was made up of extremely partisan people in their teens and twenties, why would I have heard or know about him? I wonder, do you ever watch CNN, read the NY Times or Washington Post, all of which are considered left-bias and none of which are extreme-left, as many believe Charlie Kirk was extreme-right.

How the heck do you know who made up his audience if you didn't even know who he was until like three days ago??

[Skeletor]

IF that were true, it exposes how closed off into your liberal echo chamber bubble you really are.

How the heck do you know who made up his audience if you didn't even know who he was until like three days ago??

As usual he is playing dumb and feigning ignorance.

[deadz]

As usual he is playing dumb and feigning ignorance.

Why anyone bothers with the old creep is beyond me.

[jude2]

Far-Left New Republic Urges Democrats: Shun Empathy After Kirk Assassination — Be ‘Callous, Short of Cruel’

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/09/14/new-republic-urges-democrats-shun-empathy-kirk-assassination/

Evil ass people.

[chaos]

As usual he is playing dumb and feigning ignorance.

Just like his "I haven't seen anyone celebrating his death" line of bullshit.

[illuminati]

As usual he is playing dumb and feigning ignorance.

Yes,  he does this frequently when caught out / cornered or he just ignores
& hopes it will go away.
For a man who spends time googling everything & tries so desperately hard
To come across as clever & intellectual he lets the mask slip so many times.

[Grape Ape]

This is absolutely true. So what? Charlie Kirks primary audience was made up of extremely partisan people in their teens and twenties, why would I have heard or know about him? I wonder, do you ever watch CNN, read the NY Times or Washington Post, all of which are considered left-bias and none of which are extreme-left, as many believe Charlie Kirk was extreme-right.

This shows right here the problem with the left.  CNN / Times / WaPO all ignore anything that goes against their mantras.  They are supposed to be journalists, but ignore one of the most influential conservatives who may have swayed the election to Trump with his impact on the youth?  Someone, who many thought might be President one day?  You cannot hate these publications enough.  They are evil.

Shit, anyone on any platform though would have seen clips of him.

I know conservatives know the liberals because conservative media, while biased, covers it.  Platforms like X, FB etc cover everything.

[chaos]

This is absolutely true. So what? Charlie Kirks primary audience was made up of extremely partisan people in their teens and twenties, why would I have heard or know about him? I wonder, do you ever watch CNN, read the NY Times or Washington Post, all of which are considered left-bias and none of which are extreme-left, as many believe Charlie Kirk was extreme-right.

I do read a NY Times or Washington Post article from time to time, the vast majority of the time they are just opinion hit pieces written and published as if they are fact. Terrible journalism.
Charlie Kirk was not extreme right, he was the nice guy, the guy that wanted conversation and to debate people. The people filling his shoes and moving into his spot? Not so much. Your side radicalized more young people by murdering the nice guy than any type of far right propaganda could ever.

[Primemuscle]

I do read a NY Times or Washington Post article from time to time, the vast majority of the time they are just opinion hit pieces written and published as if they are fact. Terrible journalism.
Charlie Kirk was not extreme right, he was the nice guy, the guy that wanted conversation and to debate people. The people filling his shoes and moving into his spot? Not so much. Your side radicalized more young people by murdering the nice guy than any type of far right propaganda could ever.

My side did not murder Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson assassinated him. Both sides of the current hostile political environment unfortunately influence many people's states of mind. Lately, it seems as if there is no middle ground. The people on the extreme left and the extreme right tend to be the most vocal. They do not represent the majority.

I knew nothing about Charlie Kirk before he was assassinated. Therefore, I did not know whether he was on extreme right or not. Based on what I have only recently read about him; he was a leader of the conservative youth movement. I assume not all conservative youth are on extreme right. Conservatism and liberalism includes all those folks who have moderate points of view. 

[Dos Equis]

My side did not murder Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson assassinated him. Both sides of the current hostile political environment unfortunately influence many people's states of mind. Lately, it seems as if there is no middle ground. The people on the extreme left and the extreme right tend to be the most vocal. They do not represent the majority.

I knew nothing about Charlie Kirk before he was assassinated. Therefore, I did not know whether he was on extreme right or not. Based on what I have only recently read about him; he was a leader of the conservative youth movement. I assume not all conservative youth are on extreme right. Conservatism and liberalism includes all those folks who have moderate points of view.

The "both sides do it" talking point is absolute, unadulterated BS.  This was a leftist, motivated by leftist ideology, using the precise language the left has been using for years.  The left started with censorship and morphed into violence.  Conservatives don't censor opposing viewpoints, don't use threats and violence to chase leftist speakers out of venues, and don't kill people who have different political views. 

After George Floyd died of a fentanyl overdose, the left rioted and killed people.  After Trump was nearly assassinated, twice, no conservatives rioted.  After Charlie Kirk was murdered, conservatives went to church.  Those are facts. 

[chaos]

The "both sides do it" talking point is absolute, unadulterated BS.  This was a leftist, motivated by leftist ideology, using the precise language the left has been using for years.  The left started with censorship and morphed into violence.  Conservatives don't censor opposing viewpoints, don't use threats and violence to chase leftist speakers out of venues, and don't kill people who have different political views. 

After George Floyd died of a fentanyl overdose, the left rioted and killed people.  After Trump was nearly assassinated, twice, no conservatives rioted.  After Charlie Kirk was murdered, conservatives went to church.  Those are facts.

Now that both sides are canceling people, lefties sure are crying alot. 🤣

[Primemuscle]

Now that both sides are canceling people, lefties sure are crying alot. 🤣

And righties did not cry a lot?

[chaos]

And righties did not cry a lot?

They sure did and what was said by liberal cunts? Your words and actions have consequences!!! Now you liberal fags are dealing with the consequences of your words and actions.🤣🤣

[Primemuscle]

They sure did and what was said by liberal cunts? Your words and actions have consequences!!! Now you liberal fags are dealing with the consequences of your words and actions.🤣🤣

Any negative comments about Charlie Kirk are not my words. You have not heard me say or seen me post a single unkind comment about Charlie Kirk and you never will. I believe I posted right after he was killed that I felt bad for his wife and children because of their loss. You seem to have a problem with ‘lumping’ all people together. Liberals are not all alike, anymore than are all conservative folks, anymore than are 'fags'. Do you think and behave like every other conservative person? I suspect you do not.