Author Topic: Bring back Josh, Jane and Hankins (Read 727 times)

Sandrock · « **on:** December 24, 2025, 08:41:29 PM »

For Christmas give me INTERNET WAR.

Ron apparently isn't approving new accounts right now so Josh and Jane can't get back in. Solution: just unban them.

Hankins can sue getbig whether or not he's a member. The absolute worst thing for his health is to let him back on to get pulverized again. You want him to not be a looming threat to the existence of getbig? Speed along his demise by bringing him back.

This whole no Hankins, Josh and Jane doesn't work for me, BROTHER.

Dave D · « **Reply #1 on:** December 24, 2025, 11:27:39 PM »

Merry Christmas Sandcock! Thanks for letting us know your wish list, this will make it so easy picking gifts for you!!

Kindly remind us who you are again and why we should care?

Thanks!

obsidian · « **Reply #2 on:** December 25, 2025, 12:39:08 AM »

OMG, what a bunch of fucking losers. Your lives revolve around these fellas. Go jerk off to some AI, porn, or kwon's pawg posts.

dj181 · « **Reply #3 on:** December 25, 2025, 12:49:04 AM »

I approve this message

Humble Narcissist · « **Reply #4 on:** December 25, 2025, 06:37:34 AM »

They should be in the Getbig Hall Of Fame just for getting banned. I'd rather see Sev and Adonis reinstated.

Sandrock · « **Reply #5 on:** December 25, 2025, 07:40:36 AM »

Quote from: Dave D on December 24, 2025, 11:27:39 PM

Merry Christmas Sandcock! Thanks for letting us know your wish list, this will make it so easy picking gifts for you!!

Kindly remind us who you are again and why we should care?

Thanks!

DaveDicklover obviously upset that he didn't get a traffic cone shoved up his ass for Christmas.

MuscleBuff · « **Reply #6 on:** December 25, 2025, 07:50:51 AM »

Who is Jane?

Sandrock · « **Reply #7 on:** December 25, 2025, 07:54:15 AM »

Quote from: MuscleBuff on December 25, 2025, 07:50:51 AM

Who is Jane?

She came up with the term "jiggaboo squaws" hahahaha

Kwon · « **Reply #8 on:** December 25, 2025, 03:10:59 PM »

sync pulse · « **Reply #9 on:** December 25, 2025, 11:05:35 PM »

Quote from: Sandrock on December 24, 2025, 08:41:29 PM

This whole no Hankins, Josh and Jane doesn't work for me, BROTHER.

I think Josh has sworn off social media.

Not kidding... I can't remember if it was here or where. However, I remember reading a post somewhere that he was putting down posting on the Internet to try and get his head together.

CalvinH · « **Reply #10 on:** **Today** at 08:36:50 AM »

Why was Jane banned?

joswift · « **Reply #11 on:** **Today** at 08:40:13 AM »

Quote from: CalvinH on Today at 08:36:50 AM

Why was Jane banned?

She spoke to dj181s ex wife who told her he was on the run in Eastern Europe for grooming a 15 year old child he was giving English lessons to.

CalvinH · « **Reply #12 on:** **Today** at 08:42:43 AM »

Quote from: joswift on Today at 08:40:13 AM

She spoke to dj181s ex wife who told her he was on the run in Eastern Europe for grooming a 15 year old child he was giving English lessons to.

You would think she would be rewarded not banned.

Grape Ape · « **Reply #13 on:** **Today** at 08:44:55 AM »

Quote from: CalvinH on Today at 08:42:43 AM

You would think she would be rewarded not banned.

Yes, we were commissioning a trophy for her when it happened.

joswift · « **Reply #14 on:** **Today** at 08:46:14 AM »

Quote from: CalvinH on Today at 08:42:43 AM

You would think she would be rewarded not banned.

and you would think dj would stop posting now people knew, oh, and may make other people stop conversing with him.

But this is getbig.

CalvinH · « **Reply #15 on:** **Today** at 09:02:19 AM »

Quote from: Grape Ape on Today at 08:44:55 AM

Yes, we were commissioning a trophy for her when it happened.

So your saying that there has been a complete disrespect for the Commission's commission

... I think the Commission should have a talk with the person responsible

Grape Ape · « **Reply #16 on:** **Today** at 09:04:37 AM »

Quote from: CalvinH on Today at 09:02:19 AM

So your saying that there has been a complete disrespect for the Commission's commission

... I think the Commission should have a talk with the person responsible

The Committee™ cannot worry about The Commission at the moment.

We are reviewing what are said to have been seditious comments by one of our members, and are contemplating action.

Rambone · « **Reply #17 on:** **Today** at 09:05:59 AM »

Quote from: Grape Ape on Today at 09:04:37 AM

We are reviewing what are said to have been seditious comments by one of our members, and are contemplating action.

CalvinH · « **Reply #18 on:** **Today** at 09:20:18 AM »

Quote from: Grape Ape on Today at 09:04:37 AM

The Committee™ cannot worry about The Commission at the moment.

We are reviewing what are said to have been seditious comments by one of our members, and are contemplating action.

The one you are speaking about is just a troll who makes us laugh...Until now!
The more serious problem is the one who we though garnered respect and was in contention to become a member of the Committee next time the books were opened to new members.

It was a mistake by the Committee and there needs to be a better vetting process.

There could have had another Donnie Brasco taking place!!!!