Author Topic: Priest vs. Heath  (Read 15113 times)

Dredlock Rasta

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 601
  • Can't trust shadows after dark
Priest vs. Heath
« on: May 15, 2006, 05:15:49 PM »
who wins?
Don't let em fool ya

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2006, 05:18:08 PM »
who wins?

 I think Phil has a better overall physique.

thisiskeith12

  • Guest
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #2 on: May 15, 2006, 05:20:15 PM »
I think Phil has a better overall physique.

As much as I respect Priest, Heath would be the winner.  :(

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #3 on: May 15, 2006, 05:21:31 PM »
As much as I respect Priest, Heath would be the winner.  :(

 I agree. The judges love height and Phil has some really full muscle bellies in his tris and quads. Better back than Priest and better conditioning.

HRDCOR

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1411
  • Getbig!
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2006, 05:22:17 PM »
WHATEVA !!!!!!

thisiskeith12

  • Guest
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2006, 05:23:33 PM »
I agree. The judges love height and Phil has some really full muscle bellies in his tris and quads. Better back than Priest and better conditioning.

A good analysis is that Heath contains the better overall package. Priest has everything but chest.

Dredlock Rasta

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 601
  • Can't trust shadows after dark
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2006, 05:25:20 PM »
Heath all the way!
Don't let em fool ya

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #7 on: May 15, 2006, 05:26:33 PM »
A good analysis is that Heath contains the better overall package. Priest has everything but chest.

 Heath has back, chest, quads, glutes, hams, tied on tris......the list goes on. His superior conditioning makes these muscles look better.

rocket

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10927
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #8 on: May 15, 2006, 05:26:46 PM »
Heath wins by structure, priest wins by novelty value. 


thisiskeith12

  • Guest
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #9 on: May 15, 2006, 05:28:06 PM »
Heath has back, chest, quads, glutes, hams, tied on tris......the list goes on. His superior conditioning makes these muscles look better.

Yes, I agree, he has a great overall appearance. Something at such a young age is very impressive.

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #10 on: May 15, 2006, 05:30:07 PM »
 We need to start a 20 page long picture thread like they have for Dorian and Ronnie! ;D

Sir William Idol

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3543
  • you got a fight comin
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #11 on: May 15, 2006, 05:30:26 PM »
I agree. The judges love height and Phil has some really full muscle bellies in his tris and quads. Better back than Priest and better conditioning.

are you actually gonna compare a part of lee's arm to phil's?  get the fuck outta here
its comin today

HRDCOR

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1411
  • Getbig!
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #12 on: May 15, 2006, 05:32:39 PM »
What The F@#k Eva !!!!!

Royalty

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 32994
  • Nasser Endorses Trump 🇺🇸
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2006, 05:33:09 PM »
I think Lee needs to start increasing his leg mass again. I was looking at the side shots at the ASC. Dexter, Melvin, Gustavo, Branch, ect...all beat Lee in the side poses do to their huge and cut thighs.

MisterMagoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5591
  • And now, what joy will I have left to live for?
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2006, 05:36:12 PM »
lee's more of a size freak but he really does look very stubby. his structure and since his legs are almost always soft and watery give the nod to phil in my opinion. plus the missing chest issue.

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2006, 05:38:12 PM »
lee's more of a size freak but he really does look very stubby. his structure and since his legs are almost always soft and watery give the nod to phil in my opinion. plus the missing chest issue.

 Great post. Lee's inability to get his legs dry makes me fear that his kidneys are failing :-\

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2006, 06:55:44 PM »
He has always had a drier upper body compared to his lower half.

 That's good. He seems like a good guy; I dont want him to be in poor health.

Lee_a_priest

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 2827
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #17 on: May 15, 2006, 07:19:03 PM »
Great post. Lee's inability to get his legs dry makes me fear that his kidneys are failing :-\

SORRY TO TELL YOU HAD BLOOD WORK DONE THE OTHER DAY ALL IS GOOD.
SO DR FOX PLEASE TRY AGAIN

BLAH BLAH BLAH  :P

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #18 on: May 15, 2006, 07:21:55 PM »
SORRY TO TELL YOU HAD BLOOD WORK DONE THE OTHER DAY ALL IS GOOD.
SO DR FOX PLEASE TRY AGAIN

BLAH BLAH BLAH  :P

 Why are you sorry to tell me? This is great news! I'm certainly no doctor; just your average 160 pound geek ;D

CAPTAIN MARVEL

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 233
  • The World's Mightiest Mortal
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #19 on: May 15, 2006, 07:24:42 PM »
Heath has back, chest, quads, glutes, hams, tied on tris......the list goes on. His superior conditioning makes these muscles look better.
lol Lucius get off the Heath nut-hugging. Heath has Lee on lats, chest(but his chest isn't great either), and conditioning thats it. Lee kills him on delts, tri's, bi's, forearms, calves and still beats him (but it is closer) on quads, hams, and spinal erectors. They both have structural flaws.
SHAZAM!

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #20 on: May 15, 2006, 07:29:44 PM »
lol Lucius get off the Heath nut-hugging. Heath has Lee on lats, chest(but his chest isn't great either), and conditioning thats it. Lee kills him on delts, tri's, bi's, forearms, calves and still beats him (but it is closer) on quads, hams, and spinal erectors. They both have structural flaws.

 Lee doesn't have better tris. I'll give him bis, forearms and calves, but it's not like he kills him ::) Heath wins on conditioning and polish. Post you pic ::)

xavmaster

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 202
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #21 on: May 15, 2006, 07:38:05 PM »
Both great bb's. I'm a huge Lee fan and depending how they came in a comp would decide who wins.
Very close  ;D

Stavios

  • Guest
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #22 on: May 15, 2006, 07:40:09 PM »
I think Lee would beat Phil on size AND condition. I don't know what you guys were watching saturday but Phil condition is nothing special. He doesn't have dexter-like conditionning yet.

Phil beat Lee on structure it isn't even a debate, but Phil isn't big enough yet to beat Lee

Robbie

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 289
  • Getbig!
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #23 on: May 15, 2006, 07:43:52 PM »
Heath pulls better faces :)

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Priest vs. Heath
« Reply #24 on: May 15, 2006, 09:15:06 PM »
I think Lee would beat Phil on size AND condition. I don't know what you guys were watching saturday but Phil condition is nothing special. He doesn't have dexter-like conditionning yet.

Phil beat Lee on structure it isn't even a debate, but Phil isn't big enough yet to beat Lee

  Lee has a soft lower body and is almost never able to dial in the glutes or the quads. Have your eyes been clawed out by eagles? ???