Author Topic: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad  (Read 7582 times)

UK Gold

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1541
  • Riding on the Getbig wind
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #25 on: May 19, 2006, 07:36:14 AM »
The UK edition came out today. Pathetic. The same diets, the same 'bomb you're bi's' etc etc. It'll be gone in a couple of years. Big piles will be used to cremate those vile turds joe and ben.

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #26 on: May 19, 2006, 07:37:57 AM »
The UK edition came out today. Pathetic. The same diets, the same 'bomb you're bi's' etc etc. It'll be gone in a couple of years. Big piles will be used to cremate those vile turds joe and ben.

  Did it provide any advice on "trashing your tris"? ;D

HowieW

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3785
  • Getbig!
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #27 on: May 19, 2006, 07:43:20 AM »
Muscular Development is better and could be even better if they get rid of Valentino and bring back the girls

BINGO!
I would like to also see some more coverage of the female contests as well.I am no schmo and don't want to wrassle with 'em trust me. I do enjoy all aspects of bodybuilding however and that includes the gals.

I was a subscriber to FLEX for many, many years and dropped it recently but went for MD.
Kelly Ryan married well!  Free Titus!

FLEX N FREAK

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 580
  • Getbig!
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #28 on: May 19, 2006, 07:49:20 AM »
Tre, you nailed it. I buy it out of loyalty. Ive been buying it since mid 86, along with all the others.

Man I got boxes on top of boxes of mint condition mags( thats a lot of money man ) ha ha

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #29 on: May 19, 2006, 07:58:59 AM »
BINGO!
I would like to also see some more coverage of the female contests as well.I am no schmo and don't want to wrassle with 'em trust me. I do enjoy all aspects of bodybuilding however and that includes the gals.

I was a subscriber to FLEX for many, many years and dropped it recently but went for MD.

  Are you a schmoe? :-\

MCWAY

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19327
  • Getbig!
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #30 on: May 19, 2006, 01:11:03 PM »
I buy Flex & Muscular Development. That is it. Both have great photo shoots - good articles - and talk smack. They give a different view on contests - they need to since it is about two months after it happens.

Don't like Ironman - only talks about training which I can get from internet articles. MuscleMag - if I can find it - usually talks about Canadian bodybuilding.

I usually get FLEX and MuscleMag. Both magazines pay homage to the old-school bodybuilders (besides Schwarzenegger). To me, the best magazines have the combo of old and new bodybuilders. Ron Harris writes some great articles. And, since he's a freelance guy, I can read his articles in MuscleMag.


gordiano

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17124
  • TEAM "CUTE PENIS", TEAM TRIFLIN' RONNIE COLEMAN
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #31 on: May 19, 2006, 01:32:12 PM »
  Are you a schmoe? :-\

Closet Schmoe.
HAHA, RON.....

Deadpool

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14027
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #32 on: May 19, 2006, 01:33:39 PM »
Nothing wrong with being a schmoe.  but, you're not really a schmoe, the schmoes wanna wrestle them and worship them..
X

bic_staedtler

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1209
  • That is all.
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #33 on: May 19, 2006, 03:22:28 PM »
I still read and like FLEX but some issues are better than others.  The ghostwritting is terrible but that's the way it is.  I'm at the point where you can tell they're not keeping continuity in their info...the latest Dennis James chest article has him talking about building a big chest using flat bar bench presses...he wrote 3-4 articles a few years back AGAINST flat bar benching due to shoulder problems they incur, he'd use dumbells.  They need to write SOMETHING and while I don't think it's very accurate to what the pro's actually do, it's probably somewhat close.

All the mags are pretty much useless after a year, but I keep buying FLEX just cuz.  MD has a good interview every now and then (Vince Taylor, recently) and even MuscleMag has some good articles (the muscle chef articles)....it's not like you're going to learn anything mindblowing from the mags, but sometimes if you don't care to come up with original workouts, you can rip a few from FLEX.  I just completed the 8 week strength program they had a few months back, and it's nice to just do something different.  Plus, I felt the program was pretty good and all my major lifts increased...most of their programs are cookie cutter though, and the volume is pretty high.

Plus, if you ONLY read FLEX you'd have a pretty rose colored view of pro bodybuilding....then you come to getbig and find out the REAL deal, ha....oh well. 

Johnny Apollo

  • Guest
Re: Damn, Flex Mag is getting bad
« Reply #34 on: May 19, 2006, 03:45:52 PM »
THREE main problems with FLEX...



1.Not as many pages as Muscular Development.

2.Not enough Quality Articles(MD has better ones IMO).

3.TOO MANY GODDAMN ADVERTISMENTS.