1. hardness was not dorian's problem. showing striations anywhere but his lower back was.
2. funny how dorian's midsection is all you can comment on for detail from the front. Shows you are admitting dorian's enormous detail flaws from the front. (delts, arms, legs)
3. Mindspins' post was exactly what everyone has been trying to get through your ironage head for a long time. And it was stated perfectly.
calves and "grainyness" are not enough if you lack striations, shape and detail on most of your body in comparison to a guy like a pre-gut PEAK Ronnie.
1) You're a tool , and you're wrong , striated glutes , striated lower back , striated lower lats that ran the lenght of his whole lowerback , striated chest , striated midsection !! his abs were crisp , his intercostles & obqlues were striated to hell , something Ronnie had a problem with anything over 250lbs
2) I never admited Dorian's legs were a weakness or his delts , and you're high if you think his entire legs are weak or flawed , they're not !! his upperquad seperation was odd other than that his legs kicked ass , his calves were among the best ever , his hams were awesome so as a whole his legs were just fine , and again with the blaket statements his whole arms sucked now? lol at his best his biceps wern't even a problem , his triceps were great and forearms were fantastic
3) Mindspin is entiled to his opinion but I disagree with it , and you can sum up Dorian as calves & back and I can sum up Coleman as a collection of impressive parts but not as a whole , so back to square one
