Strange thing about that pic of Ronnie is that even though his hams are dry, his back (although huge) seems to be holding a lot of after, or at least far from dry!
true, its not what it was in 1998 or 1999. But its still the best out there. and it shows that Ronnie, for the time being at least, is still deserving.
We shall have to see what happens in 2006.
A lot of the smaller guys have great detail.
ronnie combines at least some of that same detail with good size.
This is the magic combo that is why he still wins.
Detail alone is not good enough.
Size with detail will always come out on top.
The problem is when stuff like 1994 happens:
A larger, less detailed, bloated bb should NEVER defeat a razor sharp smaller one.
With Ronnie, you still have good amount of cuts and detail.
I think ronnie looked good in 2005, but thought he looked like shit in 2004.
That year he was holding water.
