Author Topic: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993  (Read 8602 times)

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
I was watching Pumping Iron then I watched some footage from Louie's comeback and I noticed his upper body just paled in comparison in his comeback compared to him in 1975. His arms looked small for his torso and his torso wasn't that big. Lou looked so much bigger in PI and his Hercules movies than in his comeback even though in his comeback he supposedly weighed 315 vs 275 when he was young. I know he was older but I think there was more to it.
The House that Ruth built

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #1 on: May 21, 2006, 08:28:43 AM »
Yes upper body looked small.
and keep moving!

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2006, 08:32:07 AM »
In comparison.
and keep moving!

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #3 on: May 21, 2006, 08:33:21 AM »
#2
and keep moving!

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #4 on: May 21, 2006, 08:34:21 AM »
#3
and keep moving!

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #5 on: May 21, 2006, 08:37:00 AM »
Ferrigno was concerned about being stereotyped as a monster and deliberately trained to be lighter & more defined instead of retaining the same mass. That and age; it was almost 20 years later. No different from Schwarzenegger and others in later years.

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #6 on: May 21, 2006, 09:20:51 AM »
Ferrigno was concerned about being stereotyped as a monster and deliberately trained to be lighter & more defined instead of retaining the same mass. That and age; it was almost 20 years later. No different from Schwarzenegger and others in later years.

I was being facetious. 
and keep moving!

Team Diver

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1436
  • Squeeeeze!!!

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #8 on: May 21, 2006, 09:53:17 AM »
Quote
I was being facetious. 
No worries, wasn't speaking to anyone in particular.  ;)

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #9 on: May 21, 2006, 10:09:34 AM »
Max, you look at some of the footage. In his comeback he had practically no v-taper. Hitting front doublebicep his arms were a shadow of what they were. Those pics are from the best you can find from his comeback. The only thing that was bigger than before in his comeback was his gut which years ago looked great and his rumored fake calf muscles. He was a lot heavier but he looked smaller. Bottom line.
The House that Ruth built

bmacsys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6074
  • Getbig!
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #10 on: May 21, 2006, 10:10:35 AM »
#3

His arms look small here. Especially the left one.
The House that Ruth built

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2006, 05:23:00 PM »
Max, you look at some of the footage. In his comeback he had practically no v-taper. Hitting front doublebicep his arms were a shadow of what they were. Those pics are from the best you can find from his comeback. The only thing that was bigger than before in his comeback was his gut which years ago looked great and his rumored fake calf muscles. He was a lot heavier but he looked smaller. Bottom line.

Since I don't have the footage from the comeback, I'll have to take your work for it. I though Lou looked better the 2nd time he won the Universe than he did in PI.
and keep moving!

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2006, 05:31:37 PM »
The concensus at the time was the he looked the best at the Universe.

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2006, 05:33:53 PM »
Bodybuilding Pro.com

cqfd

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 114
  • cylindrical waists suck!
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2006, 10:26:19 PM »
I prefer his old look too.

his modern look: guts growth, inability to do a vacuum, too much mass lost while trying to be extra ripped, his torso seems too big for his arms, proportions are worse.


LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #15 on: May 21, 2006, 10:32:44 PM »
 Calf implants ::)

gcb

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2283
  • you suffer, why?
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #16 on: May 21, 2006, 10:35:43 PM »
Calf implants ::)

yeah those calves are definitely fake - they don't even move when he changes his foot position.

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #17 on: May 21, 2006, 10:40:01 PM »
yeah those calves are definitely fake - they don't even move when he changes his foot position.


  At least they weren't synthol ;D

Max_Rep

  • Max Rep
  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3980
  • It’s about how hard you can GET hit...
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #18 on: May 21, 2006, 11:56:41 PM »
Matt C thank for the clip.

bmacsys... after seeing the clip I have to agree with you. He was never a threat to any front-runner. 
and keep moving!

LuciusFox

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8775
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #19 on: May 22, 2006, 12:05:50 AM »
Matt C thank for the clip.

bmacsys... after seeing the clip I have to agree with you. He was never a threat to any front-runner. 

  I don't think they'd let someone with calf implants win anything. ::)

dzulboy

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1997
  • Big hard and turbo charged
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #20 on: May 22, 2006, 12:17:40 AM »
#3
did that photo cost you 20 for the autograph?

KTMckay

  • Guest
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #21 on: May 22, 2006, 12:46:03 AM »
Were gonna get Ron sued for 20 bucks with all these photos of lou. :P

gibberj2

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2921
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #22 on: May 22, 2006, 01:04:22 AM »
Wow those are horrible. And I'M accused of calf implants! But seriously guys. Mine are 17.5 natural  :)

disco_stu

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4953
  • I'm a llama!
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #23 on: May 22, 2006, 01:04:57 AM »
lou was much better in his comeback than in 75. no question about it.

the illusions of BB strike again!


gtbro1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6893
Re: What the heck happened to Big Louie's physique 1975 vs 1993
« Reply #24 on: May 22, 2006, 01:21:26 AM »
did that photo cost you 20 for the autograph?


hahaha...I was gona ask that too!!  :D