Author Topic: This is morphed, right? (Read 4937 times)

FREAKgeek · « **on:** August 08, 2006, 09:58:12 AM »

damn shame cause it's a fantastic pose

davidpaul · « **Reply #1 on:** August 08, 2006, 09:59:39 AM »

Quote from: FREAKgeek on August 08, 2006, 09:58:12 AM

damn shame cause it's a fantastic pose

Not morphed, that's when flex started using excessive esceline/synthol.

FREAKgeek · « **Reply #2 on:** August 08, 2006, 10:31:57 AM »

no it's morphed. I am embarrassed now to even question it.

HUGEPECS · « **Reply #3 on:** August 08, 2006, 11:56:45 AM »

no way, that shyt aint morphed. wheeler was actually that big at a certain time

lastrep · « **Reply #4 on:** August 08, 2006, 11:59:50 AM »

Not morphed.

IceCold · « **Reply #5 on:** August 08, 2006, 12:07:57 PM »

morphed. only a bit though. his arms and shoulders were never that big even with all the synthol.

Playboy · « **Reply #6 on:** August 08, 2006, 12:11:41 PM »

Quote from: FREAKgeek on August 08, 2006, 09:58:12 AM

damn shame cause it's a fantastic pose

Nope, he looks phenomenal there. He is syntholed up though.

davidpaul · « **Reply #7 on:** August 08, 2006, 12:31:48 PM »

no way morphed

phyxsius · « **Reply #8 on:** August 08, 2006, 09:21:16 PM »

It's real..

kmhphoto · « **Reply #9 on:** August 08, 2006, 09:40:21 PM »

Quote from: FREAKgeek on August 08, 2006, 10:31:57 AM

no it's morphed. I am embarrassed now to even question it.

That's not a morphed image.
Morphing is the tranisition between 2 images.

Mobil · « **Reply #10 on:** August 08, 2006, 10:03:38 PM »

i think that one pic truely showed how much synthol he used. zero definition in the arms and delts, yet striations in the quads... anyways i would love to look like that synthol or not, not many people have an eye for synthol use.

kmhphoto · « **Reply #11 on:** August 08, 2006, 10:22:55 PM »

Quote from: Matt C on August 08, 2006, 10:07:07 PM

hmf...a lesson in semantics here Kevin?

Is the photo altered?

No, semantics is the study of meaning. Calling a single image morphed is wrong.
As for it being photoshopped........

Rottmag · « **Reply #12 on:** August 08, 2006, 10:36:04 PM »

I don't remember Flex's shoulder/arm region being that dominant.

I say "tampered with."

Van_Bilderass · « **Reply #13 on:** August 08, 2006, 11:32:25 PM »

Slightly 'shopped.

New York · « **Reply #14 on:** August 09, 2006, 02:26:15 AM »

Not morphed. I think that pic is from '99.

kyomu · « **Reply #15 on:** August 09, 2006, 03:19:46 AM »

I dont believe he used synthol. Because he had striations in his shoulder when he hits MM.

Dorian 01 · « **Reply #16 on:** August 09, 2006, 03:51:37 AM »

Quote from: kyomu on August 09, 2006, 03:19:46 AM

I dont believe he used synthol. Because he had striations in his shoulder when he hits MM.

So you don't believe him when he says he used it?

rocket · « **Reply #17 on:** August 09, 2006, 04:09:44 AM »

Its photoshopped.

Mobil · « **Reply #18 on:** August 09, 2006, 06:08:34 AM »

Quote from: rocket on August 09, 2006, 04:09:44 AM

Its photoshopped.

i dont know... if you watch battle for the olympia 99 his arms and shoulders look as big as they do in that pic

HUGEPECS · « **Reply #19 on:** August 09, 2006, 06:13:40 AM »

Quote from: kmhphoto on August 08, 2006, 09:40:21 PM

That's not a morphed image.
Morphing is the tranisition between 2 images.

these guys probably never seen a bodybuilder in person. they cant tell whether a photo is morphed or not. shame

kyomu · « **Reply #20 on:** August 09, 2006, 06:18:10 AM »

Quote from: Dorian 01 on August 09, 2006, 03:51:37 AM

So you don't believe him when he says he used it?

Oh he said? Thats news to me. If everybody know that he said,im sorry for my ignorance.

LyricTenor · « **Reply #21 on:** August 09, 2006, 07:29:41 AM »

It's not morphed. His arms have always been huge and his shoulders have synthol in them. Nothing looks stretched or warped (the way pictures do when morphed).

ribonucleic · « **Reply #22 on:** August 09, 2006, 07:39:03 AM »

Head too small.

Morphed.

Rambone · « **Reply #23 on:** August 09, 2006, 07:58:00 AM »

Looks slightly morphed, especially his right lower part of his delt by his arm

Bronx · « **Reply #24 on:** August 09, 2006, 08:09:45 AM »

I'm looking at the original as we speak...trust me folks, that pic is not "liquified"

Author Topic: This is morphed, right? (Read 4937 times)

Rottmag