They mentioned at the begining that last year's odds made some of the athletes upset, hurt their feelings, or somesuch. They had some people at like 25-1 or 50-1.
I guess you have to multiply the odds by 2 or 3 to get the accurate numbers.
Thanks for posting this.
Incredible.
A magazine will make numbers look better - because the Pro's asked for it?
How about journalistic integrity and being loyal to the readers?
I sure would love to find myself in the situation where I opened up FLEX and didn't have to do a fcuking background research on every article, to find out what REALLY happens in BB.
My point is: If the FLEX staff believes that Dave Henry has a 1000-1 chance of winning - then that is exactly what they should write.
By purposedly lying, and not writing any disclaimer whatsoever, FLEX is totally in the gutter.
There is absolutely no point in buying FLEX today except for the contest pics. Horton gets the job done, and very good too. When I buy FLEX for the Olympia and Arnold coverage, it's not for the BS that is written. Horton carries that mag IMO.
But he can only carry it for two issues.
YIP
Zack