If the judging were fair Ruhl would be the only one with a chance. He is the only current pro I have seen who competes with Ronnie on a mass for mass basis.
The idea that his shape is not as good as Ronnie's boggles my mind. Can anyone SPECIFICALLY tell me where Ronnie has better overall shape than Ronnie? Don't give me the insults and I am crazy crap; make a solid argument. I will say ahead that you just can't. Ruhl has an incredible V-taper. Ruhl has huge size and good overall shape.
If Ruhl is in good condition he competes nicely.
Chris