Author Topic: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place? (Read 7109 times)

body88 · « **Reply #25 on:** September 22, 2006, 12:18:43 PM »

Quote from: nukkaready on September 22, 2006, 07:27:24 AM

An argument can be made that Ruhl should have beaten Cutler at the AC in 2003 when they were compared. Ruhl definitely has a bigger frame than Cutler and certainly has more mass than him lb for lb. Anyway... as always IFBB judges will be too close-minded to look past previous placings and the top names... just as you are.

Either that or they relize ruhl looks like shit next to cutler. Either or tho!

body88 · « **Reply #26 on:** September 22, 2006, 12:19:32 PM »

Quote from: vein-x on September 22, 2006, 12:11:00 PM

Haha... this is what kills me about some people on Getbig. Look at the picture DIRECTLY ABOVE your post. What's so funny? It's almost like you read the thread title and then NOTHING in the thread and go directly to the REPLY button.

Monster irony really, when you consider which post preceeded yours

AHAHHAHAAHHAHAHAHHA

Ruhl beating cutler :

Big Worm · « **Reply #27 on:** September 22, 2006, 12:22:02 PM »

Quote from: thisiskeith12 on September 21, 2006, 09:18:59 PM

Cutler got Ronnie beat!

Put the comparison pics up..!!!

cqfd · « **Reply #28 on:** September 22, 2006, 01:19:48 PM »

Quote from: UPINTHEMGUTS on September 22, 2006, 08:39:39 AM

Ruhl's bicep peaks are insane.

as insane as ernie taylor tris...

Jr. Yates · « **Reply #29 on:** September 22, 2006, 02:23:16 PM »

Quote from: Big Worm on September 22, 2006, 12:22:02 PM

Put the comparison pics up..!!!

Is there any recent Ronnie pics?

Royalty · « **Reply #30 on:** September 22, 2006, 03:23:07 PM »

Quote from: Scimowser on September 22, 2006, 07:16:32 AM

i cant believe im actually reading this, someone actually thinks Ruhl is gonna challenge Jay for 2nd? Not a fuckin chance, when was the last time he was even close to Jay in a contest? He doesnt dwarf Jay, not even close. Lb for lb Jay has way more mass than Ruhl

TrapsMcLats · « **Reply #31 on:** September 22, 2006, 03:29:24 PM »

well... those pics are from the 2004 ASC when cutler was wAYYY over dieted and flat as all hell, but i think even if cutler is as big as he can be with conditioning... a spot on ruhl can be VERY VERY dangerous.

Royalty · « **Reply #32 on:** September 22, 2006, 03:37:26 PM »

Quote from: TrapsMcLats on September 22, 2006, 03:29:24 PM

well... those pics are from the 2004 ASC when cutler was wAYYY over dieted and flat as all hell, but i think even if cutler is as big as he can be with conditioning... a spot on ruhl can be VERY VERY dangerous.

no the pics are from the 2003 ASC.

Ruhl utterly crushed Jay at the 2004. Ruhl looked to be 40lbs heavier (285 vs 245)

quadzilla456 · « **Reply #33 on:** September 22, 2006, 03:42:22 PM »

Quote from: Royalty on September 22, 2006, 03:23:07 PM

Ruhl is taller than I thought. He looks to be one or two inches taller than Ronnie as well.

Royalty · « **Reply #34 on:** September 22, 2006, 03:50:09 PM »

Ronnie and Markus are about even in height

Hulkster · « **Reply #35 on:** September 22, 2006, 03:54:56 PM »

ruhl's back will always keep him down.

Royalty · « **Reply #36 on:** September 22, 2006, 04:03:56 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on September 22, 2006, 03:54:56 PM

ruhl's back will always keep him down.

his back is very big and wide. his detail is s l o w l y comming in

but lets see another pic from the front! 2000 mr o

Scimowser · « **Reply #37 on:** September 23, 2006, 02:10:00 AM »

thats the thing about Ruhl, he looks like hes 320 but weighs 280. However i stand by what i said, Jay is 270 and is a good 3-4" shorter so he has more muscle lb for lb.

Sir William Idol · « **Reply #38 on:** September 23, 2006, 02:23:16 AM »

stomper · « **Reply #39 on:** September 23, 2006, 02:49:42 AM »

branch warren will place 2nd

phyxsius · « **Reply #40 on:** September 23, 2006, 04:43:03 AM »

Quote from: stomper on September 23, 2006, 02:49:42 AM

branch warren will place 2nd

why not first?

nukkaready · « **Reply #41 on:** September 23, 2006, 07:16:14 AM »

Quote from: Scimowser on September 23, 2006, 02:10:00 AM

thats the thing about Ruhl, he looks like hes 320 but weighs 280. However i stand by what i said, Jay is 270 and is a good 3-4" shorter so he has more muscle lb for lb.

You really need to get away from making weight references. Neither you nor I know how much those guys really weigh off season or come contest day. There is no official weigh in as in boxing for instance. Bodybuilders are known to blow everything out of proportion especially when it comes to weight and measurments. Fact is on any comparison pic you can find between Markus and Jay, be it old or recent, Markus is wider, thicker and bigger. The comparison photos posted in this thread make it painfully obvious. Unfortunately, we do have a close minded judging panel so nothing will change...

richbmraz03 · « **Reply #42 on:** September 23, 2006, 07:45:56 AM »

Agree w/ Royality, if Ruhl come's in to the O looking like he did at 03 ASC, or 02NOC , Will give Cutler & Ronnie a run

Option D · « **Reply #43 on:** September 23, 2006, 07:47:54 AM »

Ruhls genetics wont allow him to beat cutler...i actually dont think he has triceps. like at all

nukkaready · « **Reply #44 on:** September 23, 2006, 07:51:29 AM »

Quote from: big_mal on September 23, 2006, 07:47:54 AM

Ruhls genetics wont allow him to beat cutler...i actually dont think he has triceps. like at all

Ruhl already beat Cutler... so much for his genetics won't allow it

... the judges won't allow it to happen again.

MikeThaMachine · « **Reply #45 on:** September 23, 2006, 08:07:54 AM »

Quote from: nukkaready on September 22, 2006, 07:27:24 AM

An argument can be made that Ruhl should have beaten Cutler at the AC in 2003 when they were compared. Ruhl definitely has a bigger frame than Cutler and certainly has more mass than him lb for lb. Anyway... as always IFBB judges will be too close-minded to look past previous placings and the top names... just as you are.

Let's see...............

willie mosconi · « **Reply #46 on:** September 23, 2006, 08:32:04 AM »

nobody has mentioned the blatant synthol abuse yet $:-\$

the shadow · « **Reply #47 on:** September 23, 2006, 09:36:56 AM »

Quote from: MikeThaMachine on September 23, 2006, 08:07:54 AM

Let's see...............

ruhl wins hands down.no contest.it sucks they gave it to gutler

wannahit2 · « **Reply #48 on:** September 23, 2006, 10:18:37 AM »

Insane, Ruhl couldn't touch Cutler. Jay looks awesome 1 week out. Secondly, I will say that Jay doesn't finish second, and is beat by Victor Martinez. Victor looks unreal, saw him last week.

The top 6 is going to be a fight and a half. Can't wait

willie mosconi · « **Reply #49 on:** September 23, 2006, 01:05:08 PM »

Ruhl is so structurally flawed that Cutler could never lose to him unless he is really out of shape

Author Topic: Cutler vs Ruhl for second place? (Read 7109 times)

body88

body88