Author Topic: OLYMPIA REVIEW: The way I see it THE WAY IT SHOULD BE! (Read 4298 times)

alexxx · « **on:** October 02, 2006, 04:31:41 PM »

Jay Cutler - should of finished out of the top 6, he was lacking any detail of proportion. His physique is reminicent of a cow

Markus Rulh - 6th dispite small chest and triceps

Ronnie - should of been 5th - Obviously something was off

Troy - 4th - awesome potential only needs to improve legs and calves

Dexter - 3rd - Is cut on upperbody but not so on lower and also lost his calves

Melvin - 2nd - best double bicep in the show, best presentation

Gunter - winner best most muscular - hard and in condition -

luv2build · « **Reply #1 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:36:16 PM »

MARKUS=SMALL CHEST? are you RETARDED??? compared to who?

alexxx · « **Reply #2 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:39:24 PM »

Quote from: luv2build on October 02, 2006, 04:36:16 PM

MARKUS=SMALL CHEST? are you RETARDED??? compared to who?

His chest development is very lacking. He has no inner chest. Compared to his whole physique chest is lagging as much as his triceps. Its partly his fault because of his crappy training and partly because of his crappy genes.

HERACLES · « **Reply #3 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:42:24 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on October 02, 2006, 04:31:41 PM

Jay Cutler - should of finished out of the top 6, he was lacking any detail of proportion. His physique is reminicent of a cow

Markus Rulh - 6th dispite small chest and triceps

Ronnie - should of been 5th - Obviously something was off

Troy - 4th - awesome potential only needs to improve legs and calves

Dexter - 3rd - Is cut on upperbody but not so on lower and also lost his calves

Melvin - 2nd - best double bicep in the show, best presentation

Gunter - winner best most muscular - hard and in condition -

thank God you will never have anything to do with the judging. Terrible evaluation, imho. Sorry Alexx. $:-\$

MELVIN SECOND?

?
Melvin looks good, but not good enough to beat out everyone to second..no way...

Stavios · « **Reply #4 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:43:02 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on October 02, 2006, 04:39:24 PM

His chest development is very lacking. He has no inner chest. Compared to his whole physique chest is lagging as much as his triceps. Its partly his fault because of his crappy training and partly because of his crappy genes.

his chest is torn, that's why his inner chest looked like this

alexxx · « **Reply #5 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:46:22 PM »

Quote from: HERACLES on October 02, 2006, 04:42:24 PM

thank God you will never have anything to do with the judging. Terrible evaluation, imho. Sorry Alexx. $:-\$

MELVIN SECOND??
Melvin looks good, but not good enough to beat out everyone to second..no way...

Accept the truth.

alexxx · « **Reply #6 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:47:40 PM »

Quote from: Stavios on October 02, 2006, 04:43:02 PM

his chest is torn, that's why his inner chest looked like this

It throws off the balance of his physique. Twinklebell should of though about form before lifting weights he couldn't handle.

bb doc · « **Reply #7 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:51:22 PM »

I think Alexxx is having a funny w/ y'all......

Stavios · « **Reply #8 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:52:24 PM »

Quote from: bb doc on October 02, 2006, 04:51:22 PM

I think Alexxx is having a funny w/ y'all......

no he is serious

alexxx · « **Reply #9 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:58:03 PM »

Quote from: Stavios on October 02, 2006, 04:52:24 PM

no he is serious

I am. From the Olympia video I've seen thats the way it should have gone. Would of saved the sport.

Jr. Yates · « **Reply #10 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:59:26 PM »

Quote from: luv2build on October 02, 2006, 04:36:16 PM

MARKUS=SMALL CHEST? are you RETARDED??? compared to who?

LMAO when i read that! haha! how could you say that alex. nvm you think your chest is big...so it makes sense.

Stavios · « **Reply #11 on:** October 02, 2006, 04:59:31 PM »

I think the top 6 was right on

alexxx · « **Reply #12 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:00:08 PM »

Quote from: Stavios on October 02, 2006, 04:59:31 PM

I think the top 6 was right on

Thanks.

Stavios · « **Reply #13 on:** October 02, 2006, 05:01:11 PM »

not your top 6 !

CF · « **Reply #14 on:** October 02, 2006, 11:05:19 PM »

Quote from: alexxx on October 02, 2006, 04:31:41 PM

Jay Cutler - should of finished out of the top 6, he was lacking any detail of proportion. His physique is reminicent of a cow

Markus Rulh - 6th dispite small chest and triceps

Ronnie - should of been 5th - Obviously something was off

Troy - 4th - awesome potential only needs to improve legs and calves

Dexter - 3rd - Is cut on upperbody but not so on lower and also lost his calves

Melvin - 2nd - best double bicep in the show, best presentation

Gunter - winner best most muscular - hard and in condition -

So, Jay not in the top 6? Markus, with less detail and separation than Jay, 6th? Ronnie 5th??? Troy, I guess, because he has awesome potential but weak legs and calves deserves 4th.

Dexter 3rd ah ok, this is your only decent remark. Melvin 2nd, maybe in a year or two, and btw double biceps is one pose there are 7 mandatories. Gunter 1st?

?? That proves you have no judging abilities at all. Symmetry mean anything to you at all? Yes he was hard, he's always hard, was he more muscular than Markus? Branch? Ronnie? Geesh, i'm glad your not a judge. And by the way, where would you have had Vic Martinez, last?

the shadow · « **Reply #15 on:** October 03, 2006, 01:03:00 AM »

Quote from: alexxx on October 02, 2006, 04:31:41 PM

Jay Cutler - should of finished out of the top 6, he was lacking any detail of proportion. His physique is reminicent of a cow

Markus Rulh - 6th dispite small chest and triceps

Ronnie - should of been 5th - Obviously something was off

Troy - 4th - awesome potential only needs to improve legs and calves

Dexter - 3rd - Is cut on upperbody but not so on lower and also lost his calves

Melvin - 2nd - best double bicep in the show, best presentation

Gunter - winner best most muscular - hard and in condition -

THE MOST RETARDED OLYMPIA REVIEW EVER!!!!i only agree with you on ruhl being in 6th place..thE rest of your views are crap..gunter 1st...WHAAAAAAAAAAAAT!!!!!!!

sammy1980 · « **Reply #16 on:** October 03, 2006, 04:46:19 AM »

melvin won the mr o

Mars · « **Reply #17 on:** October 03, 2006, 04:48:32 AM »

Horrible genes for chest? have you seen made in germany? normally biggest chest in the sport.

adipo8 · « **Reply #18 on:** October 03, 2006, 05:21:01 AM »

Quote from: alexxx on October 02, 2006, 04:31:41 PM

Jay Cutler - should of finished out of the top 6, he was lacking any detail of proportion. His physique is reminicent of a cow

Markus Rulh - 6th dispite small chest and triceps

Ronnie - should of been 5th - Obviously something was off

Troy - 4th - awesome potential only needs to improve legs and calves

Dexter - 3rd - Is cut on upperbody but not so on lower and also lost his calves

Melvin - 2nd - best double bicep in the show, best presentation

Gunter - winner best most muscular - hard and in condition -

next time go to the show and do not watch it on webcast.

SteelePegasus · « **Reply #19 on:** October 03, 2006, 05:22:24 AM »

Quote from: alexxx on October 02, 2006, 04:39:24 PM

His chest development is very lacking. He has no inner chest. Compared to his whole physique chest is lagging as much as his triceps. Its partly his fault because of his crappy training and partly because of his crappy genes.

Yes Alexxx, his chest is severly under-developed

alexxx · « **Reply #20 on:** October 03, 2006, 07:23:15 AM »

Quote from: CF on October 02, 2006, 11:05:19 PM

So, Jay not in the top 6? Markus, with less detail and separation than Jay, 6th? Ronnie 5th??? Troy, I guess, because he has awesome potential but weak legs and calves deserves 4th. Dexter 3rd ah ok, this is your only decent remark. Melvin 2nd, maybe in a year or two, and btw double biceps is one pose there are 7 mandatories. Gunter 1st??? That proves you have no judging abilities at all. Symmetry mean anything to you at all? Yes he was hard, he's always hard, was he more muscular than Markus? Branch? Ronnie? Geesh, i'm glad your not a judge. And by the way, where would you have had Vic Martinez, last?

Vic is a fool! Why the hell did he want to tear his quadriceps?

alexxx · « **Reply #21 on:** October 03, 2006, 07:25:14 AM »

Quote from: Mars on October 03, 2006, 04:48:32 AM

Horrible genes for chest? have you seen made in germany? normally biggest chest in the sport.

Yeah I saw it. The guy has a weak chest and weird shaped on top of that.

CF · « **Reply #22 on:** October 03, 2006, 07:28:47 AM »

Quote from: alexxx on October 03, 2006, 07:23:15 AM

Vic is a fool! Why the hell did he want to tear his quadriceps?

Your hysterical! This is how it happened, on leg day a while before the Olympia he walked into the gym and said "I'm gonna train my legs till I tear my quad!" And yes he went ahead and did it! That's how it happened, cause he wanted to do it. I'll keep it clean, there's a couple of adjectives I'd like to use to describe that comment.

alexxx · « **Reply #23 on:** October 03, 2006, 07:30:04 AM »

Quote from: CF on October 03, 2006, 07:28:47 AM

Your hysterical! This is how it happened, on leg day a while before the Olympia he walked into the gym and said "I'm gonna train my legs till I tear my quad!" And yes he went ahead and did it! That's how it happened, cause he wanted to do it. I'll keep it clean, there's a couple of adjectives I'd like to use to describe that comment.

Well if he would've teared one side then I would understand but both wtf?

Arnold jr · « **Reply #24 on:** October 03, 2006, 07:58:44 AM »

Gunter 1st

I like Gunter, but this was one of his worst showings ever...how can you say he was hard, it was the softest I've ever seen him.

And you say Jay looks like a cow, if so, then Marcus looks like 5 cows. Jay had plenty of detail, and although he has freaky bodyparts, they are in proportion of one another since they are all freaky body parts..

You need to understand, this is called bodybuilding, massive muscle, with massive cuts, deep separation and spot on condition wins shows...no one ever said it was supposed to be pretty...they call that modeling, maybe that's the arena you should follow.