Epic front down syndrome pose.
Are you saying "If you don't have it, don't hit it?"
What I find fascinating about bodybuilding...is that you can take someone whose back looks the same from the back...but that it can look like they have no back/lats from the front.
There was a big guy posting on the MuscleMag.com forums way back in the day [2001] who was 5'10" and 250-lb, who had a great rear lat spread, but who didn't have that "pop" to his lats in the rear double biceps.
See how Danny Padilla has that bulbous look to his lats, yet other bodybuilders who have better backs from the back would not have that look from the front.
I have absolutely fuck all for lats from the front - that loser Walter Sobchak posted a great photo of me showing just how bad my "T" taper is...
What I mean is: I don't consider my back to be a strength, but I think it looks better from the back.
I'm sure learning to pose properly would help. I'll try to dig up that picture that Walter Sobchak posted showing what I mean.
EDIT:
Found the picture that loser Walter Sobchak has of me saved on his hard drive. It illustrates what I mean. Whatever back I have from the back, which more or less just matches my physique, utterly disappears from the front. Although I'm certain I'm posing wrong too...but it is an aspect of bodybuilding that I've noticed that bodybuilders who backs seem ok in proportion to their physiques from the back, look weak from the front.
