tom brady fucking houston texans in the ass!!

[Mr Nobody]

Go Jets.

[El Diablo Blanco]

You're right and maybe my words came out wrong, but let's not lose sight of the fact that Brady is 35yo now.  He's in great shape, but this is about the point when we'd expect to start seeing a decline in production, however because of a terrific O-line and the aforementioned players, his effectiveness is going to be extended. 

I should have added that they will be SB contenders for at least another 3-4 years, even as Brady begins to approach age 40.

This is not the 1980s anymore.  Athletes in general don't  have the downslide at 35 anymore.  There is some funky cell regeneration shit in Germany that a lot of pro athletes do in the offseason.  A lot of the top golfers, soccer players, baseball players etc...  Apparently it keeps them feeling younger longer.  Who knows.  Plus the use of HGH which the NFL doesn't test for helps prolong a career.

[tu_holmes]

Haha. If that happens every asshole from Mass. will spend the next 10 years acting like the Pats went 3-0 against the G-Men.

Exactly... They will jump up and down for the next century talking about how great their "dynasty" is.

[Tre]

This is not the 1980s anymore.  Athletes in general don't  have the downslide at 35 anymore.  There is some funky cell regeneration shit in Germany that a lot of pro athletes do in the offseason.  A lot of the top golfers, soccer players, baseball players etc...  Apparently it keeps them feeling younger longer.  Who knows.  Plus the use of HGH which the NFL doesn't test for helps prolong a career.

True, plus the rules now are intended to keep the QBs upright. 

[Grape Ape]

Exactly... They will jump up and down for the next century talking about how great their "dynasty" is.

Yeah, they often ignore the fact they haven't won a SB in almost a decade.

[Shockwave]

Yeah, they often ignore the fact they haven't won a SB in almost a decade.

Crazy how time flies. Seems like it was a couple years ago that they were winning SB's and making everyone their bitch.

[Grape Ape]

Crazy how time flies. Seems like it was a couple years ago that they were winning SB's and making everyone their bitch.

Agreed.

It was the same with the Yankees "drought" from 2001-2008.  It gets masked by a couple of WS/SB appearances and a slew of division championships.

[El Diablo Blanco]

Yeah, they often ignore the fact they haven't won a SB in almost a decade.

lol but you can't ignore the fact that he won three.  The argument that he hasn't won in 8 years is laughable because many times haven't won a single on in decades.  I still hate Brady though

[tu_holmes]

lol but you can't ignore the fact that he won three.  The argument that he hasn't won in 8 years is laughable because many times haven't won a single on in decades.  I still hate Brady though

I don't think anyone is saying anything to ignore that fact... They have ALWAYS been in it and they definitely had a great run already. I'm just saying that people talk about how great NE is all the time, and they ARE, but they ignore the fact that they haven't won a superbowl in a long, long time.

No one acts like the Giants are so great and they've won 2 in the past 4 years.

Just seems like we need to be more realistic about it... That's all I'm saying.

[Grape Ape]

lol but you can't ignore the fact that he won three.  The argument that he hasn't won in 8 years is laughable because many times haven't won a single on in decades.  I still hate Brady though

It's not laughable in the context of a "dynasty" which is what I was referring to.    EDIT: see Tu's post above.

Nobody's denying the camera aided wins and domination of the early 2000s.  Just saying that you need chanpionships to keep a dynasty going.  Not every year, but there's too much time between them here to call the Pats a dynasty, as they are perceived.

[Palpatine Q]

I don't think anyone is saying anything to ignore that fact... They have ALWAYS been in it and they definitely had a great run already. I'm just saying that people talk about how great NE is all the time, and they ARE, but they ignore the fact that they haven't won a superbowl in a long, long time.

No one acts like the Giants are so great and they've won 2 in the past 4 years.

Just seems like we need to be more realistic about it... That's all I'm saying.

They haven't won in 8 years, and the way New England fans carry on you would think The Patriots and not the Giants won last year.

[Grape Ape]

They haven't won in 8 years, and the way New England fans carry on you would think The Patriots and not the Giants won last year.

I live 10 minutes from Foxboro stadium and can verify this.  Can't blame them, their baseball team is about to miss the playoffs for the fourth year in a row.

[Tre]

The Raiders are a dynasty of suckitude.

[Shockwave]

The Raiders are a dynasty of suckitude.

Lol.

[Nails]

Lol.

The Raiders are a dynasty of suckitude.

BULLSHIT!!!


We rank 6th in the NFL highest winning percentage

The last 5 years have really fucked us , dropped us from 4th to 6th


but yea, We stink   

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/957129-ranking-every-nfl-team-by-historical-winning-percentage/page/33


1. Chicago Bears: 711-515-42 (.580)
2. Dallas Cowboys: 447-328-6 (.577)
3. Miami Dolphins: 397-298-4 (.571)
4. Green Bay Packers: 675-524-36 (.563)
5. San Francisco 49ers: 518-422-15 (.551)
6. Oakland Raiders: 424-347-11 (.550)
7. New York Giants: 642-528-33 (.549)
8. Cleveland Browns: 489-404-13 (.547)
9. Minnesota Vikings: 415-344-9 (.547)
10. Baltimore Ravens: 136-114-1 (.544)
11. New England Patriots: 408-365-9 (.528)






 

[King Shizzo]

It's not laughable in the context of a "dynasty" which is what I was referring to.    EDIT: see Tu's post above.

Nobody's denying the camera aided wins and domination of the early 2000s.  Just saying that you need chanpionships to keep a dynasty going.  Not every year, but there's too much time between them here to call the Pats a dynasty, as they are perceived.

They were a dynasty.  Now, they are just a model of excellence. 

[King Shizzo]

BULLSHIT!!!


We rank 6th in the NFL highest winning percentage

The last 5 years have really fucked us , dropped us from 4th to 6th


but yea, We stink   

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/957129-ranking-every-nfl-team-by-historical-winning-percentage/page/33


1. Chicago Bears: 711-515-42 (.580)
2. Dallas Cowboys: 447-328-6 (.577)
3. Miami Dolphins: 397-298-4 (.571)
4. Green Bay Packers: 675-524-36 (.563)
5. San Francisco 49ers: 518-422-15 (.551)
6. Oakland Raiders: 424-347-11 (.550)
7. New York Giants: 642-528-33 (.549)
8. Cleveland Browns: 489-404-13 (.547)
9. Minnesota Vikings: 415-344-9 (.547)
10. Baltimore Ravens: 136-114-1 (.544)
11. New England Patriots: 408-365-9 (.528)






 

Just goes to show you just how atrocious the Patriots were. This is the 10th consecutive year of 10+ win seasons, and still they are barely over .500

[Grape Ape]

They were a dynasty.  Now, they are just a model of excellence. 

I think that's fair.

[The Abdominal Snoman]

They were a dynasty.  Now, they are just a model of excellence. 

If they win this year, it would be impossible to look at what they've done since 2000 and not think its a total dynasty for over a decade. I agree though, they need another SB this year or next.

[Grape Ape]

If they win this year, it would be impossible to look at what they've done since 2000 and not think its a total dynasty for over a decade. I agree though, they need another SB this year or next.

That logic makes the Yankees dynasty go from 96-2011.  Would you agree?

[King Shizzo]

All I know, is that the 49ers are next to get ass-raped by the Patriots on sunday night!

[The Abdominal Snoman]

That logic makes the Yankees dynasty go from 96-2011.  Would you agree?

good point

[arce1988]

  Thread keeps going