No, he said he was unbeatable compared to his contemporaries i.e. 2001 crap competitors
What you and pictures can never take into account is what I call "shock factor." When the judges saw Dorian in 1993 they probably shit their pants. I believe Dorian makes a greater first impression because he was diesel brick of muscle. He was denser than a golden nugget. Coleman was just as big, but held more water and was softer, eventhough he had more cuts.
I guess you can't read either. Here is what Peter said:
Peter McGough Flex Magazine August 2005
“Personally,
the best physique I ever saw onstage (there was a contender for best-ever that I saw offstage: those crazy photos of sock-footed Dorian Yates taken seven weeks before the 1993 Mr. Olympia)
was Ronnie's at the 2001 Arnold Schwarzenegger Classic. He was cut, full, trim in the waist and a monster (proving that when you're supersharp, you look superbig)
at 244 pounds.
Ronnie sporting that look would, in my opinion, be unbeatable and would make any criticisms as redundant as a chocolate squat rack.”
Learn to read before you type your nonsense.