Author Topic: ND and Hulkster (You have to admire how they stand by their man in trunks) (Read 7075 times)

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #25 on:** June 20, 2009, 08:10:01 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 08:05:26 PM

but you don't so it doesn't matter what you do for a living - your still as delusional as ever.

but your flowery occupation does indicate your sexual prefernce (blocky white guys) LOL

coming from the guy who claimed Ronnie has more detailed calves than Dorian , and the guy who said Yates lost in 1993 to Flex and Ronnie dominated in 2001 bu losing the whole prejudging lmao I know 100 times more than you on the subject case closed , hell you didn't know all rounds are physique rounds

my occupation is totally irrelevant but you need an angle to attack because you can't defend your position , even Ronnie doesn't agree with you

Hulkster · « **Reply #26 on:** June 20, 2009, 08:17:06 PM »

every time you post that stuff I roll my eyes,

because:

1. once the 93 video/pics came out, it was quite clear that flex was off his AC shape, and didn't deserve to win. I changed my opinion. it went right over your flowery head as always..

2. Ronnie did have very detailed calves in 99 - watch the video. they had no size and shitty shape, but they had more detail than dorian shows in most shots

3. ronnie dominated the prejudging in reality but lost on paper - the judges fucked up. see pics flowerboy.

Hulkster · « **Reply #27 on:** June 20, 2009, 08:20:45 PM »

shitty size. shitty shape. but there is a hell of a lot of detail there:

Hulkster · « **Reply #28 on:** June 20, 2009, 08:21:42 PM »

^
man ronnie's glutes, hams and calves make dorian's whole lower body look soft..

no big suprise there, of course.

clued-up · « **Reply #29 on:** June 20, 2009, 08:34:37 PM »

Quote from: TrueGrit on June 20, 2009, 03:33:13 PM

Serious question broskies, do you ever get tired of this same fucking argument?

silly question. if they tired of arguing they'd stop. they complete each other.

England_1 · « **Reply #30 on:** June 20, 2009, 08:48:24 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 08:17:06 PM

3. ronnie dominated the prejudging in reality but lost on paper - the judges fucked up. see pics flowerboy.

LMFAO...everytime Ronnie loses it's the judges fault. Right

Jay won in 2001. Face it.

pumpster · « **Reply #31 on:** June 20, 2009, 08:50:26 PM »

Quote from: England_1 on June 20, 2009, 08:48:24 PM

LMFAO...everytime Ronnie loses it's the judges fault. Right Jay won in 2001. Face it.

The Columbu of the 90s "won" a boatload of gimmies thanks to uncle joe. It wasn't close like 01, the barrel lost except where it counted-between joe's knees. Something tells me ND's always been envious of that view.

England_1 · « **Reply #32 on:** June 20, 2009, 09:15:39 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on June 20, 2009, 08:50:26 PM

The Columbu of the 90s "won" a boatload of gimmies thanks to uncle joe. It wasn't close like 01, the barrel lost except where it counted-between joe's knees. Something tells me ND's always been envious of that view.

Yates owns your mental midget mind

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #33 on:** June 21, 2009, 05:50:35 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 20, 2009, 08:17:06 PM

every time you post that stuff I roll my eyes,

because:

1. once the 93 video/pics came out, it was quite clear that flex was off his AC shape, and didn't deserve to win. I changed my opinion. it went right over your flowery head as always..

2. Ronnie did have very detailed calves in 99 - watch the video. they had no size and shitty shape, but they had more detail than dorian shows in most shots

3. ronnie dominated the prejudging in reality but lost on paper - the judges fucked up. see pics flowerboy.

1) pics and video of 1993 Olympia were out LONG before you mad you're retarded claim in fact I scanned 5 different magazines coverage of the contest and posted them long before after looking at the pics you decided Dorian lost to Flex and only after taken a beating to you amend your opinion

2) more detail I still always laugh at that once of your most retarded statements , this my dim witted friend doesn't merit a response , enough said

3) once again you're in direct opposition with reality , only your pure ignorance on how bodybuilding contests are judged can permit you to claim hes dominating , all you can do is type ' see pics ' I've seen all the pics and video and Jay is soundly beating Ronnie in the prejudging and Ronnie is in no way shape or form ' dominating ' go learn what the word oxymoron means , one doesn't dominate by losing . you're always contradicting reality it must suck to have to constantly make excuses lol

1998 wasn't a close contest ( Hulkster's fantasy ) reality it was extremely close in fact one of the closest contests in history 3 points

reality owns you

bodybuilder1234 · « **Reply #34 on:** June 21, 2009, 05:54:39 AM »

lmao at this thread

Here we go again!

Immortal_Technique · « **Reply #35 on:** June 21, 2009, 06:07:26 AM »

Hahaha I just pissed my pants when I saw this thread turn into another massive argument hahahaahahah

Hulkster · « **Reply #36 on:** June 21, 2009, 07:15:53 AM »

Quote

1998 wasn't a close contest ( Hulkster's fantasy ) reality it was extremely close in fact one of the closest contests in history 3 points

you keep going back to the scoresheet as if the scoresheet was an accurate reflection of what was seen onstage.

it wasn't:

see for yourself:

Flex gets owned in every shot.

sorry.

ps what is your excuse going to be this time?

Vorkosigan · « **Reply #37 on:** June 21, 2009, 07:48:25 AM »

Quote from: TrueGrit on June 20, 2009, 03:33:13 PM

Serious question broskies, do you ever get tired of this same fucking argument? The amount of time and energy you've now put into your muscleman feud must have taken a serious chunk out of your short time on this planet.

Is it worth it when it's clear that you've never changed each other's minds and most people leave threads when you start bickering?

Have you thought of meeting at a hotel or something for a weekend conference?

Will you start posting naked pics of Dorian and Ronnie now?

I guess you have your answer

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #38 on:** June 21, 2009, 08:17:45 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on June 21, 2009, 07:15:53 AM

you keep going back to the scoresheet as if the scoresheet was an accurate reflection of what was seen onstage.

it wasn't:

see for yourself:

Flex gets owned in every shot.

sorry.

ps what is your excuse going to be this time?

yeah because contests are judged on a scoring system , in your magical world Ronnie dominated 1998 , he's better conditioned than 01 ASC and 10 pounds bigger in 99 despite it not being his best showing , Dorian lost in 93 to Flex , Ronnie has more detailed calves than Dorian any year , Dorian was the most overrated bodybuilder in history , Ronnie was grainer than Dorian ever was lol

you live in a magical place kid , I roam in reality you should try it some time

The Ugly · « **Reply #39 on:** June 21, 2009, 08:21:41 AM »

So let's settle this then, once and for all: Ronnie or Dorian?

Hulkster · « **Reply #40 on:** June 21, 2009, 10:51:27 AM »

Quote

he's better conditioned than 01 ASC and 10 pounds bigger in 99 despite it not being his best showing

many people agree that it is his best showing.

look around whenever pics are posted.

the comments are all the same: ronnie's 99 presentation was his best overall look..

http://www.musclemecca.com/showthread.php/99-coleman-everyone-else-4268.html?t=4268

Quote

In my mind ,thats Ronnies best ever shape.

Quote

the 99 RC is the best physique to ever step onstage

Quote

99= Ronnies best ever

McGough disagrees's, although he feels it is better than 98 (check the article he wrote that you hate)

etc..

you can't escape the reality of how good people feel Ronnie 99 was..

Hulkster · « **Reply #41 on:** June 21, 2009, 10:53:46 AM »

Quote

99 he looked the best IMO.

Quote

Ronnie's best ever

etc.

fact is Flowerboy, the majority of people in the industry, when reminded of how he looked in 99 all say the same:

it was his best ever shape.

esp. since he was 10 pounds bigger than the AC..

Hulkster · « **Reply #42 on:** June 21, 2009, 10:57:03 AM »

this is so damn easy:

Quote

99-the best ever ronnie

Quote

99 Ronnie Coleman... thge greatest EVER!!! COLEMAN 1999>ANYBODY!!!

but no, ND claims it is only I who feels 99 ronnie was his best ever shape

LMAO

no wonder you cant advance above flowers in life LOL

The Ugly · « **Reply #43 on:** June 21, 2009, 11:03:10 AM »

ND, your response?

Hulkster · « **Reply #44 on:** June 21, 2009, 11:15:27 AM »

Quote from: The Ugly on June 21, 2009, 11:03:10 AM

ND, your response?

he'll post quotes without posting any sort of corroborating proof.

thats what he doesnt get. quotes without pics/vids to back them up are useless..

what good is a quote from Ronnie or McGough saying that 98 (or whatever) was his best shape if all the pics and videos show this to be WRONG?

99 was his best look overall.

Hulkster · « **Reply #45 on:** June 21, 2009, 11:21:12 AM »

he looked great at the AC, but he was virtually the same (only bigger) at the 99 Olympia:

all the quotes in the world wont refute real life:

real life is the tiebreaker between bullshit and reality:

Hulkster · « **Reply #46 on:** June 21, 2009, 11:22:38 AM »

more proof as to why so many feel ronnie 99 was his best:

Hulkster · « **Reply #47 on:** June 21, 2009, 11:26:57 AM »

as you can see, Ronnie was virtually just as cut in 99 was he was at the AC

but he was 10 pounds bigger.

if you just looked at the bullshit ND posts, you would think he was 309 pounds overweight and soft in 99 compared to the AC

thank god we have pics and videos to refute misinformed opinions..be they Ronnie, ND or McGough..

pumpster · « **Reply #48 on:** June 21, 2009, 11:31:05 AM »

This winning reality can't be adequately conveyed by words.

Hulkster · « **Reply #49 on:** June 21, 2009, 12:01:46 PM »

ronnie was hard as nails in 1999, and 257 pounds to boot: