Several, not just 1.
1. Using 2 digits
2. Using damaged digits
3. not centering
4. doing this understanding as 33333 claims all stamps were 4 digits
If they are savvy enough to change it from USPS to USPO why stop there? Why open the door to problems by allowing those 4 oversights?
Add that to the fact that's its permissible by the post office, can you, Grape, seriously say there is something to this other than extreme unlikeliness?
I think all scenarios are possible. I absolutely think it's plausible they could be savvy enough to recognize the nuances of changing an S to an O, but completely botch another aspect of the forgery. It's not a case of letting something slide, it's a case of making a mistake, or not being as good at this as they thought. I don't think it's a slam dunk argument.
I'm passed all this. Something smells here without a doubt, but I don't think it's going to go anywhere, so I'm not spending too much time on it. The left has done a great job at creating such a universally dismissive attitude about this subject.
But, it is nice to see you take a legitimate shot at a counter argument, rather than fall in lockstep like the other leftist dipshits here. They're doing exactly what is wanted of them.