Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 05:03:36 AM

Title: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 05:03:36 AM
Behold and tremble in fear before Arnold.  The tree that walks like a man.....

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/TheAustrianOak.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 05:08:57 AM
Another favorite.  Guaranteed un-photoshopped and un-morphed.  Recognize bitches!


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/MrOlympia1974.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: purenaturalstrength on March 25, 2012, 05:11:41 AM
can not even begin to match coleman
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: wes on March 25, 2012, 05:19:05 AM
can not even begin to match coleman
That`s like comparing Reeves to Arnold...........huge time gap between the two.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: NeilGM on March 25, 2012, 05:22:10 AM
What a chest
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: wes on March 25, 2012, 05:23:50 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 05:23:59 AM
can not even begin to match coleman

You are right.  Arnold can't match Colemans bloated GH stomach.  Arnold was silly, for some reason he preferred to have a tight, sharply defined midsection.  


Bodybuilders today are fooling themselves if they think Coleman and all the other blocky blobs are an improvement over Arnold.


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/74Back.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 05:25:36 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/HugeBack.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: wes on March 25, 2012, 05:26:18 AM
 ;)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 05:26:53 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/74Front2.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: WOOO on March 25, 2012, 05:52:55 AM
definitely looks healthier than today's olympians
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: indie-lad on March 25, 2012, 06:17:16 AM
King of kings.

His body and attitude made him a GOD. Maybe even THE GOD...
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Bad Boy Dazza on March 25, 2012, 06:48:29 AM
This has always been my favorite Arnold pic. 

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/TheAustrianOak.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: david94 on March 25, 2012, 07:19:29 AM
You are right.  Arnold can't match Colemans bloated GH stomach.  Arnold was silly, for some reason he preferred to have a tight, sharply defined midsection.  


Bodybuilders today are fooling themselves if they think Coleman and all the other blocky blobs are an improvement over Arnold.


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/74Back.jpg)

Arnold had large hips and massive obliques in most contests. Considering he was maybe the biggest drug abuser of his generation, their is no doubt he would have had the same mentality if he competed 30 years later. He was lucky to have a great line at his time as drugs couldn't allow his gut and his waist growing. But the fact is that if he had competed during Coleman's area he would have been more predisposed to destroy his line than Ronnie himself who started his career with a small waist and large clavicles. Add the fact he had more weak body-parts like shoulders or legs, he would have had a much more unbalanced physique than you think.
Arnold was just lucky to compete during a period where drugs only sublimate your physique without adding bad visible effects like gh gut, balonie etc... but I'm sure his career would have been totally different with a current drug protocol and against more genetically gifted guys than him...

Remember that, the first goal of every people on the world who train is gaining muscle. The main objective of the bodybuilder is to be bigger than yesterday and skinnier than tomorrow, that's why you pump your muscles everyday. This is how Arnold was thinking in his time and this how he would have thought if he would have competed today.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: che on March 25, 2012, 07:24:42 AM
Behold and tremble in fear before Arnold.  The tree that walks like a man.....

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/TheAustrianOak.jpg)

GTFO ,  his waist is smaller than his chest  hahahaa.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Mussolini on March 25, 2012, 07:25:23 AM
can not even begin to match coleman

No doubt, because Arnold looks 100x better than Coleman ever did.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Lord Humungous on March 25, 2012, 07:33:06 AM
Almost as impresive as Sergio in his prime
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: _bruce_ on March 25, 2012, 07:45:16 AM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/74Front2.jpg)

Crazy size.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: wolfgang187 on March 25, 2012, 07:55:36 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Irongrip400 on March 25, 2012, 08:22:03 AM
Almost as impresive as Sergio in his prime

I agree, and Bill Pearl circa 72 I think as well.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: bradistani on March 25, 2012, 08:24:47 AM
can not even begin to match coleman

coleman is a sack of watery shit when compared to the austrian oak  8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Parker on March 25, 2012, 08:29:26 AM
You are right.  Arnold can't match Colemans bloated GH stomach.  Arnold was silly, for some reason he preferred to have a tight, sharply defined midsection.  


Bodybuilders today are fooling themselves if they think Coleman and all the other blocky blobs are an improvement over Arnold.


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/74Back.jpg)
Coleman wasn't "blocky" he didn't have the genetics to be...did he get a gut, yep...and I think one of the main reasons is that his waist was small, all the extra only had one way to go---outward.

For the person saying imagine Arnold on 23iu, he had the genetics for blockiness...he was wide waisted, he'd look similar to Gunter.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: david94 on March 25, 2012, 09:51:24 AM
hahaha there is no comeback for you my son especially after you downloaded this pic just to use it against tards on a forum! hahahaha :D :D :D :D :D :D

You prove a second time you are not made to hold a discussion with an average human being. Do you know you can directly copy the url link of the photo and paste it without recording it in your computer?
By the way I'm not sure, English is not my native language, but did you call you "tard" yourself? ???
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ritch on March 25, 2012, 10:15:30 AM
dude, wtf??? a good month in ban camp should be in order for your shit.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: indie-lad on March 25, 2012, 10:22:50 AM
Your statement sadly is like your avatar pic. Since its stupid to talk theoretically what or who WOULD do if they were now, we can only look at what IT IS now. Ronnie was a monkey mutant with less coherency then Bush J. and Arnold always was looking and behaving like a God. Pure and simple!


This. Perfectly said...

End of thread.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: BIG ACH on March 25, 2012, 10:39:27 AM

Here is a photoshopped photo of Arnold.... designed to illustrate what Arnold probably would've looked like if he competed today and had access to the drugs that are available now which weren't available in his time:

(http://imagecdn.bodybuilding.com/img/user_images/growable/2007/10/28/11059532/gallerypic/1202351e.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: crownshep on March 25, 2012, 10:46:40 AM
.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 12:55:13 PM
You prove a second time you are not made to hold a discussion with an average human being. Do you know you can directly copy the url link of the photo and paste it without recording it in your computer?
By the way I'm not sure, English is not my native language, but did you call you "tard" yourself? ???

You sound like Eric Cartman trying to explain why a picture of him with Butter's dick in his mouth isn't gay. 
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: purenaturalstrength on March 25, 2012, 01:00:10 PM
Here is a photoshopped photo of Arnold.... designed to illustrate what Arnold probably would've looked like if he competed today and had access to the drugs that are available now which weren't available in his time:

(http://imagecdn.bodybuilding.com/img/user_images/growable/2007/10/28/11059532/gallerypic/1202351e.jpg)

they forgot to shop his waist to pregnant mode
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: OptimusPrime1980 on March 25, 2012, 01:07:20 PM
Arnold had large hips and massive obliques in most contests. Considering he was maybe the biggest drug abuser of his generation, their is no doubt he would have had the same mentality if he competed 30 years later. He was lucky to have a great line at his time as drugs couldn't allow his gut and his waist growing. But the fact is that if he had competed during Coleman's area he would have been more predisposed to destroy his line than Ronnie himself who started his career with a small waist and large clavicles. Add the fact he had more weak body-parts like shoulders or legs, he would have had a much more unbalanced physique than you think.
Arnold was just lucky to compete during a period where drugs only sublimate your physique without adding bad visible effects like gh gut, balonie etc... but I'm sure his career would have been totally different with a current drug protocol and against more genetically gifted guys than him...

Remember that, the first goal of every people on the world who train is gaining muscle. The main objective of the bodybuilder is to be bigger than yesterday and skinnier than tomorrow, that's why you pump your muscles everyday. This is how Arnold was thinking in his time and this how he would have thought if he would have competed today.
ronnie wide clavicles???? lol..... sure... ::) ::) ::)
ronnnie is awesome but he is not very wide at all..... sure his mass made up for it... but he did not have wide clavicles... wide clavicles is what Dennis James have, Dennis Wolf, Chis Cormier..... totally different look then coleman....

sure arnold did not have the narrowest hips or waist... but it was all in proportion to his delt width.... so really a mute point....
i can remember a mr Olympia with a waist wayyy worse.......  ;)
Arnold on todays regime would look like a better Gunther....he was a smart man, so he would take care of his midsection....
but yeah he would have a gut.... like all do today ... some just hide it better then others...
but arnold would be very , very competitive! do not be mistaken! would have the best Arms, Chest, on stage....
also he had calves... legs were ok.... very complete.... 
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Voland on March 25, 2012, 01:09:09 PM
why did you download that pic to your computer?

don't be so harsh and the guy...maybe he just drew it. :-X
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: deadpan on March 25, 2012, 01:11:13 PM
there's still some contemporary bbers like david hoffmann that have good size and a narrow waist



i can't help but think you can get pretty big with proper use of gh/slin while avoiding the gut to some degree

seems to me like IFBB pros lately just eat whatever the fuck they want and use any and every drug they can get with no logical thought process involved


another thing that i personally feel ruined bodybuilding is all the tanning shit going on, they look like bloated red pieces of meat. back in arnold's day you'd just hit the beach when you needed to tan
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: wild willie on March 25, 2012, 01:12:22 PM
Arnold's chest is still unmatched today!

IMHO
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: david94 on March 25, 2012, 01:50:48 PM
ronnie wide clavicles???? lol..... sure... ::) ::) ::)
ronnnie is awesome but he is not very wide at all..... sure his mass made up for it... but he did not have wide clavicles... wide clavicles is what Dennis James have, Dennis Wolf, Chis Cormier..... totally different look then coleman....

sure arnold did not have the narrowest hips or waist... but it was all in proportion to his delt width.... so really a mute point....
i can remember a mr Olympia with a waist wayyy worse.......  ;)
Arnold on todays regime would look like a better Gunther....he was a smart man, so he would take care of his midsection....
but yeah he would have a gut.... like all do today ... some just hide it better then others...
but arnold would be very , very competitive! do not be mistaken! would have the best Arms, Chest, on stage....
also he had calves... legs were ok.... very complete.... 

Ronnie has larger clavicle than average people so he can be considered as a "large" person even if his big waist makes him narrower sometimes.
For the rest, you just prove yourself I'm right when I say people idealize too much how Arnold would be great with today's drugs. Yes, he would be a better version than Gunther, which means it's not even sure he would have won an Olympia.
Back in the days, mass was by far the main criteria to choose the winner contrary to what people think. Today, the winner is not always the biggest on stage, he is the guy who has the best body-parts. Arnold would be the biggest but he would have too much weak points in comparison to guys like Green, Heath, Coleman, Flex...


Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: deadpan on March 25, 2012, 02:21:18 PM
Ronnie has larger clavicle than average people so he can be considered as a "large" person even if his big waist makes him narrower sometimes.
For the rest, you just prove yourself I'm right when I say people idealize too much how Arnold would be great with today's drugs. Yes, he would be a better version than Gunther, which means it's not even sure he would have won an Olympia.
Back in the days, mass was by far the main criteria to choose the winner contrary to what people think. Today, the winner is not always the biggest on stage, he is the guy who has the best body-parts. Arnold would be the biggest but he would have too much weak points in comparison to guys like Green, Heath, Coleman, Flex...


not true at all, look at the posedown here in the 99 mr o, ronnie coleman's shoulder width is not any wider than flex wheeler, who is like the crowned poster boy for narrow clavicles. same with kevin levrone. ronnie has average clavicular width at best, he just knew how to cover it up with his mass but it started to show in his later years when the gut got big and muscles started to shrink.

Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: GraniteCityDon on March 25, 2012, 02:26:23 PM
I dont understand the argument raised continuously of Arnold having weak legs, his calves were outstanding and his quads were proportionate. 40 years ago nobody - NOBODY - had mammoth quads as it wasn't deemed necessary. His cuts and size were perfect for the physique he displayed during his time, but as with everything times change and now we have drugs enabling mediocre competitors to display 30"+ quads at sub 5 ft 10. Coleman in the 70's would be nothing near what he was in the 00's and Arnold would have been a completely different specimen competing today. Champions of evolution, but know this for certain: without Arnold there wouldnt have been a Ronnie Coleman, 8* Mr Olympia.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: jakesonyou on March 25, 2012, 02:47:01 PM
Arnold is the second greatest bodybuilder of all time according to the official list.  He is only second to Dorian "The GOAT" Yates.

Arnold put bodybuilding in the spotlight with his charm and charisma.  He is was and still is a big influence for me!

Arnold's physique was perfect.  Excellent quads and great calves.  One of the best chests.  Tall like myself, so you just dwarf over all the small guys.  Amazing biceps with a peak.  Fantastic midsection.  One of the best posers.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 03:29:43 PM
Dorian Yates looks like a blocky turd.  He had a great back and his conditioning was amazing but he looked like total shit.  He was also a boring douche who did nothing to get people into the sport.  I'd even argue that he helped to kill the sport and turn it into the queer freakshow it is today.  He was one of the guys that ushered in the era of size and conditioning being more important than aesthetics and presentation.  Some GOAT.  Furthermore, there is no OFFICIAL list because it is a subjective sport.  Any moron can make a list.  It doesn't mean anything.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Heywood on March 25, 2012, 03:40:50 PM
they forgot to shop his waist to pregnant mode

Now that they literally photo-shop Arnold photos on mag covers, I don't fully trust most of these photos.  You'd have to scan the mag page. 
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: magikusar on March 25, 2012, 03:56:26 PM
Behold and tremble in fear before Arnold.  The tree that walks like a man.....

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/TheAustrianOak.jpg)

no one  could best him
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: OptimusPrime1980 on March 25, 2012, 04:03:47 PM
Ronnie has larger clavicle than average people so he can be considered as a "large" person even if his big waist makes him narrower sometimes.
For the rest, you just prove yourself I'm right when I say people idealize too much how Arnold would be great with today's drugs. Yes, he would be a better version than Gunther, which means it's not even sure he would have won an Olympia.
Back in the days, mass was by far the main criteria to choose the winner contrary to what people think. Today, the winner is not always the biggest on stage, he is the guy who has the best body-parts. Arnold would be the biggest but he would have too much weak points in comparison to guys like Green, Heath, Coleman, Flex...



you are rambling bro...
ronnie does NOT have wide clavicles.... he was known for his ridiculous mass... and good frame.. not for width....
go look at Dennis James, Dennis Wolf... Chris Cormier THAT is what wide clavicles look like.. completely different look...
and arnold more weak points then flex??? please... flex looked good up until he started oiling up.... and he had the width of a fitness contestant.... flex had no calves... no width, very average back... and quite frankly got lost when competing with the big boys... he was a small dude ... period...
arnold had NO real weak points... period.... legs were good for when he competed... had symmetry, proportions.. mass... calves... all there....
and about being a better Gunther... who was the only one to beat ronnie during his reign???? yeah Gunther.... and he is top 5 olympia.... so a better version of Gunter would do what???? yep... WIN!

Arnold = the GOAT!!!! period!!
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: jdooly on March 25, 2012, 04:40:12 PM
Arnold's chest is still unmatched today!

IMHO
truth....I also agree, his chest is unmatched....the best of all time, perfect from top to bottom, wide, thick and full....the best chest of any bodybuilder past or present. 
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: david94 on March 25, 2012, 05:42:06 PM
you are rambling bro...
ronnie does NOT have wide clavicles.... he was known for his ridiculous mass... and good frame.. not for width....
go look at Dennis James, Dennis Wolf... Chris Cormier THAT is what wide clavicles look like.. completely different look...
and arnold more weak points then flex??? please... flex looked good up until he started oiling up.... and he had the width of a fitness contestant.... flex had no calves... no width, very average back... and quite frankly got lost when competing with the big boys... he was a small dude ... period...
arnold had NO real weak points... period.... legs were good for when he competed... had symmetry, proportions.. mass... calves... all there....
and about being a better Gunther... who was the only one to beat ronnie during his reign???? yeah Gunther.... and he is top 5 olympia.... so a better version of Gunter would do what???? yep... WIN!

Arnold = the GOAT!!!! period!!


Ok, maybe Ronnie is not a wide guy.
But sorry Arnold said himself Flex was the best bodybuilder of all time at the Arnold classic 93. Each body-part of Flex was a strong point except chest who is not so bad. Flex didn't win any Olympia cause of his lack of dedication, not cause of his genetic.  A dwarf like Shawn Ray almost won twice against Dorian so you don't even imagine how many titles Flex would have won if he was always on. And let me laughing when you say Flex had an average back lol I won't develop. ::)
And yes, Arnold's needed just a little bit more legs to match his upper body, but that's not the main problem. You had bbers with more pleasant muscularity during the 70's like Sergio Oliva, Serge Nubret, or Robby Robinson. You have even guys who think Oliva was a better bber than Arnold or Serge Nubret should have won in 75 (I disagree in both cases). The only thing Arnold had against them was his mass. 20 or 30 years later, there are more guys who combined mass with pleasant muscularity like Ronnie, Levrone, Phil Heath, Flex... Even Dexter would have a chance against a modern Arnold considering he has beaten a lot of mass monsters during his whole career.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: OptimusPrime1980 on March 25, 2012, 06:35:52 PM
Ok, maybe Ronnie is not a wide guy.
But sorry Arnold said himself Flex was the best bodybuilder of all time at the Arnold classic 93. Each body-part of Flex was a strong point except chest who is not so bad. Flex didn't win any Olympia cause of his lack of dedication, not cause of his genetic.  A dwarf like Shawn Ray almost won twice against Dorian so you don't even imagine how many titles Flex would have won if he was always on. And let me laughing when you say Flex had an average back lol I won't develop. ::)
And yes, Arnold's needed just a little bit more legs to match his upper body, but that's not the main problem. You had bbers with more pleasant muscularity during the 70's like Sergio Oliva, Serge Nubret, or Robby Robinson. You have even guys who think Oliva was a better bber than Arnold or Serge Nubret should have won in 75 (I disagree in both cases). The only thing Arnold had against them was his mass. 20 or 30 years later, there are more guys who combined mass with pleasant muscularity like Ronnie, Levrone, Phil Heath, Flex... Even Dexter would have a chance against a modern Arnold considering he has beaten a lot of mass monsters during his whole career.
flex had detail in his back.... but when standing next to the big boys he simply got lost....
flex was good... but not great... i like levrone a lot better.... flex in his last years was all oil! very obvious... and he was very narrow... and i think a bb should be wide!
oliva was not on arnolds level.. he always was smooth.... nubret was good but lacked the sheer mass.... and did you see his toothpicks??? in that era nobody had very big legs.... arnolds were among the best in that era.. period!

and about jean almost winning from doz.... lol.. yeah almost  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
jean looked like a little kneegrow asking if he could shine dorian his shoes.... lol!
dorian was above the rest.. even with a torn arm....

about flex...he did not win an olympia because there were better bb around...he had his change when dorian retired.... but lost to ronnie... why? because ronnie was better... period!
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 06:44:04 PM
I'm not a big fan of the word "IF".  I didn't intend this to be a debate about what might have been. I'd prefer to focus on what was and what is. 

With that being said, I will add that I think people who sit back and say Arnold's legs should have been bigger are mistaken.  Throughout his career his legs were more that big enough and more than defined enough for the standard of that time.  Some people look at things through a modern lens.  Today's standard is for bodybuilders to have obscenely large legs (and stomachs for that matter).  I hate it and I think it makes bodybuilders all look fat and blocky even when they are at super low bodyfat levels.  As much as I dislike it, that is the standard of today.  Fine.  But........That was not the standard in the 70's and to judge Arnold by this new standard is pantently insane. 

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/74MM.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: apply85 on March 25, 2012, 06:45:29 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/USCgJ.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: apply85 on March 25, 2012, 06:48:21 PM
(http://i.imgur.com/2nhTN.jpg)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: apply85 on March 25, 2012, 06:49:43 PM
(http://muscletime.com/gallery-12931)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: apply85 on March 25, 2012, 06:50:50 PM
(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=40943&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: apply85 on March 25, 2012, 06:53:01 PM
ronnie is as wide as cormier, or wider, adnhis waste is small

(http://muscletime.com/index.php?view=image&format=raw&type=img&id=40949&option=com_joomgallery&Itemid=202)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 25, 2012, 08:20:25 PM
..
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ChristopherA on March 25, 2012, 08:24:57 PM
Cormier was so structurely perfect. If he didn't pop so much x he could have been a world beater
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 25, 2012, 08:43:28 PM
I don't understand the point of posing a bunch of non Arnold comparison photos in this thread.  As much muscle as those guys are carrying they stilll look like shit.  They are short and overdeveloped.  When they suck in their bloated GH guts they can look good for a moment.  It doesn't change the fact that their stomachs and their beefed up legs look absurd.

For every good picture of a modern bodybuilder I can show you one of these......

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/Ron.jpg)

Or worse if I have to
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 26, 2012, 09:16:46 AM
 ;)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: mazrim on March 26, 2012, 09:27:07 AM
Nubret beats him, imo. Never really liked Arnolds physique for some reason.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Iceman1981 on March 26, 2012, 09:29:23 AM
...........
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: closeline on March 26, 2012, 09:45:55 AM
there's still some contemporary bbers like david hoffmann that have good size and a narrow waist



i can't help but think you can get pretty big with proper use of gh/slin while avoiding the gut to some degree

seems to me like IFBB pros lately just eat whatever the fuck they want and use any and every drug they can get with no logical thought process involved


another thing that i personally feel ruined bodybuilding is all the tanning shit going on, they look like bloated red pieces of meat. back in arnold's day you'd just hit the beach when you needed to tan

very true

every sane official would rather ban unnatural color than creating silly categories if he or she wants to make the cult more attractive
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 26, 2012, 09:48:45 AM
Nubret beats him, imo. Never really liked Arnolds physique for some reason.


 :)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: closeline on March 26, 2012, 09:53:22 AM
;)

arnold is so much better in every aspect except thighs-development and conditioning (would so easy to achive for arnold with todays pharma gh)

arnolds 40 fucking years old version of his arms would have been the best on this years arnold classics

it s crazy

and don t talk about best pecs ever

he naild it with a 40 yr old version too

today he would look as mindblowing as a 2003 ronnie with dorians calves and shawn ray s abs presented in the unbeatable arnold style that could make him win the Mr O in Steve Namat s body  ;D
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 26, 2012, 09:56:56 AM
..
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: OptimusPrime1980 on March 26, 2012, 11:10:18 AM
(http://i.imgur.com/2nhTN.jpg)
this pic shows exactly what i mean....
both chris and dennis are wider the ronnie... i am not talking musclemass i am talking structure....
just look at the clavicles... only a blind person would not see the difference....
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: hench on March 26, 2012, 01:50:32 PM
correct, he has the narrow/pinched shoulder structure. Needed huge delts to make up for it.
this pic shows exactly what i mean....
both chris and dennis are wider the ronnie... i am not talking musclemass i am talking structure....
just look at the clavicles... only a blind person would not see the difference....

Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: apply85 on March 26, 2012, 02:05:15 PM
chris may be just a bit wider, but only in that pose where he sticks his shoulders out, ronnie is still above average when it comes to width of shoulders and his waist is of course small
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: dyslexic on March 26, 2012, 02:31:18 PM
Another favorite.  Guaranteed un-photoshopped and un-morphed.  Recognize bitches!


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/MrOlympia1974.jpg)


Someone had to Photoshop the font on the top of the pic, and unless you took it yourself, you can guarantee nothing....
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: mazrim on March 26, 2012, 02:46:37 PM

 :)

That's just one pic. I could post pics all day of Nubret killing him. So, I will rephrase it by saying (in general) Nubret has a better physique or if both were at top form Nubret would win if it wasn't about publicity/popularity, etc.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: purenaturalstrength on March 26, 2012, 03:22:12 PM
That's just one pic. I could post pics all day of Nubret killing him. So, I will rephrase it by saying (in general) Nubret has a better physique or if both were at top form Nubret would win if it wasn't about publicity/popularity, etc.
nubret looks great with his arms next to his torso since his arms are not that good
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: david94 on March 26, 2012, 04:08:13 PM

 :)


his abs look weird in that pose. Of course Arnold kills him.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: jude2 on March 26, 2012, 07:21:34 PM
truth....I also agree, his chest is unmatched....the best of all time, perfect from top to bottom, wide, thick and full....the best chest of any bodybuilder past or present. 
I agree his chest to waist ratio is just insane.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 26, 2012, 08:38:05 PM
That's just one pic. I could post pics all day of Nubret killing him. So, I will rephrase it by saying (in general) Nubret has a better physique or if both were at top form Nubret would win if it wasn't about publicity/popularity, etc.

4:47.... ;)

Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Iceman1981 on March 26, 2012, 10:10:04 PM
Ever seen this one ARNIE1947?

Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Zé galinha on March 26, 2012, 10:43:40 PM
(http://img1.orkut.com/images/mittel/1330138965/121484821/of.jpg)

 :)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on March 26, 2012, 11:07:17 PM
My favorite of him. Massive in the off season.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 26, 2012, 11:31:58 PM

Someone had to Photoshop the font on the top of the pic, and unless you took it yourself, you can guarantee nothing....

This is my scan of a George Butler photo that I personally cut from a 1990's Flex magazine.  I have seen up-close an original Butler print of this photo.  I flat out guarantee that this photo is un-shopped. 
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Infidel on March 26, 2012, 11:42:06 PM
Nubret beats him, imo. Never really liked Arnolds physique for some reason.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/biggums.png)Tyronne says you on crack
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Naggash on March 27, 2012, 12:21:15 AM
you are rambling bro...
ronnie does NOT have wide clavicles.... he was known for his ridiculous mass... and good frame.. not for width....
go look at Dennis James, Dennis Wolf... Chris Cormier THAT is what wide clavicles look like.. completely different look...
and arnold more weak points then flex??? please... flex looked good up until he started oiling up.... and he had the width of a fitness contestant.... flex had no calves... no width, very average back... and quite frankly got lost when competing with the big boys... he was a small dude ... period...
arnold had NO real weak points... period.... legs were good for when he competed... had symmetry, proportions.. mass... calves... all there....
and about being a better Gunther... who was the only one to beat ronnie during his reign???? yeah Gunther.... and he is top 5 olympia.... so a better version of Gunter would do what???? yep... WIN!

Arnold = the GOAT!!!! period!!


Good post, however Cormier does not have wide capped delts like DJ or Wolf. I've seen him up close in person and although fuckin huge, his shoulders weren't particularly wide structure wise.

 Like Ronnie he had great chest and back mass which allowed him to look wide when posing.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 03:37:26 AM
Ever seen this one ARNIE1947?



 :)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 03:48:06 AM
..
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: TheTrueVictor on March 27, 2012, 04:37:30 AM
My favorite of him. Massive in the off season.

That's not actually an offseason pic. That's Arnold backstage at the 1974 Mr. Olympia.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: TheTrueVictor on March 27, 2012, 04:39:45 AM
ARNIE1947, are you the one running this page...?

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Arnold-Schwarzenegger-Muscle-Magazines/193068927463501
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: OptimusPrime1980 on March 27, 2012, 04:43:37 AM
Good post, however Cormier does not have wide capped delts like DJ or Wolf. I've seen him up close in person and although fuckin huge, his shoulders weren't particularly wide structure wise.

 Like Ronnie he had great chest and back mass which allowed him to look wide when posing.
sometimes i wonder if some of you even think before posting something, lol!!!
Chris does not have wide capped delts?? lol sure.... ::) ::) ::) ::)
chris cormier has feaking ass wide clavicles.... look at the pic.... shoulders themselves can not be wide... they can be BIG, ROUND... width comes from??? CLAVICLES!!!!! it's your BONESTRUCTURE!!!
most people have an angle in their clavicles.. Chris's go straight!! no angle... a straight line...
really some of you are clueless.... Ronnie had an angle.... flex had an big angle.... Philsulina well i won't even comment....lol!

i also have seen CC irl... he had huge shoulders.... guess you must have seen him in his party days... lol...
Chris is naturally WIDE dude..... period.....

your post made me go  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Marlo Stanfield on March 27, 2012, 04:50:13 AM
Behold and tremble in fear before Arnold.  The tree that walks like a man.....

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/TheAustrianOak.jpg)
wamnd... where the fuck did bodybuilding go wrong and take a turn for the worse?

THIS is what a body should look like (no homo)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 04:54:32 AM
ARNIE1947, are you the one running this page...?

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Arnold-Schwarzenegger-Muscle-Magazines/193068927463501

 no.... 8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Punisher on March 27, 2012, 04:57:30 AM
Another favorite.  Guaranteed un-photoshopped and un-morphed.  Recognize bitches!


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/MrOlympia1974.jpg)


I believe in one interview, Arnold said he has those black and white Photos Framed and hang on his walls
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: The_Punisher on March 27, 2012, 04:59:01 AM
GTFO ,  his waist is smaller than his chest  hahahaa.


lol........bodybuilders of today goes for the Pregnant look
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 27, 2012, 06:26:55 AM
This has always been my favorite Arnold pic.  (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/TheAustrianOak.jpg)

X2.

Thats what i call "an Unusual built" you can be ripped, at 200,230,250 It doesnt matter, his muscles are simply different from any other pro bb.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: jprc10 on March 27, 2012, 06:54:33 AM
Behold and tremble in fear before Arnold.  The tree that walks like a man.....

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v78/IpreferKeaton/misc/Sports/TheAustrianOak.jpg)

There was one man that Arnold himself feared and trembled at, the myth.
Much better physique than Arnold.

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/oliva/so193.jpg)

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/oliva/so210.jpg)

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/oliva/so184.jpg)

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/oliva/so185.jpg)

(http://digilander.libero.it/gruppociak/so69.jpg)

Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 07:26:46 AM
There was one man that Arnold himself feared and trembled at, the myth.
Much better physique than Arnold.

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/oliva/so193.jpg)

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/oliva/so210.jpg)

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/oliva/so184.jpg)

(http://www.schwarzenegger.it/mro/oliva/so185.jpg)

(http://digilander.libero.it/gruppociak/so69.jpg)


Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 07:34:45 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 07:43:29 AM
74...
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 07:46:11 AM
74...
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 07:52:13 AM
..
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 08:11:23 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Iceman1981 on March 27, 2012, 09:39:45 AM
.........
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 10:29:34 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 10:36:53 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Iceman1981 on March 27, 2012, 11:34:36 AM
Great pics ARNIE. Here are a few more.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: hench on March 27, 2012, 02:06:08 PM
ridiculously thick in the 2 74 Olympia pics :o
74...
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Adam86 on March 27, 2012, 04:46:54 PM
all pec and biceps and a huge personality
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 08:27:36 PM
Great pics ARNIE. Here are a few more.

 :)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 08:33:02 PM
 8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: tommywishbone on March 27, 2012, 08:34:53 PM
Damn. Not too bad.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 27, 2012, 08:42:52 PM
....
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Iceman1981 on March 27, 2012, 09:49:44 PM
Damn. Not too bad.

This one looks crazy.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Iceman1981 on March 27, 2012, 10:04:12 PM
Hey ARNIE, do you know what competition these are from. I have the video, but it doesn't say where it was from. Do you think it might be the 1967 NABBA Amateur Universe?
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: AbrahamG on March 27, 2012, 10:30:40 PM
I wonder how many dudes have sucked his cock?
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 28, 2012, 04:55:40 AM
Hey ARNIE, do you know what competition these are from. I have the video, but it doesn't say where it was from. Do you think it might be the 1967 NABBA Amateur Universe?

I have that video...I think it is from 1966....
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 28, 2012, 04:59:22 AM
67......
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 28, 2012, 08:21:19 AM
I wonder how many dudes have sucked his cock?

Not as much as hot whites and latinas chicks....


Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 28, 2012, 08:22:47 AM
In 1980 he was back !
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: hipolito mejia on March 29, 2012, 06:08:10 AM
Let see If Philsulin,fridge Gutler and Microwave Branch can put 23 sandows together"
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Jaime on March 29, 2012, 06:43:46 AM
Arnold with todays gear would look like Gunter but with a considerably better chest and worse thighs, delts.

Would the sheer mass enable him to win? Not sure, it would be close.

His look is very overated though, he was blocky and lacked flow, Wolf looks better for example.

Huge chest and arms though, just blew up on gear.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on March 29, 2012, 10:29:34 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: flinstones1 on March 29, 2012, 10:40:39 AM
arnold was just a freak of nature
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: indie-lad on April 01, 2012, 05:49:37 AM
Arnold with todays gear would look like Gunter but with a considerably better chest and worse thighs, delts.

Would the sheer mass enable him to win? Not sure, it would be close.

His look is very overated though, he was blocky and lacked flow, Wolf looks better for example.

Huge chest and arms though, just blew up on gear.

You're an idiot. Overated?? The guy became king of the world because of his body. Bow down before Arnold and kiss his feet.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on April 01, 2012, 05:51:31 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Jaime on April 01, 2012, 08:51:39 AM
You're an idiot. Overated?? The guy became king of the world because of his body. Bow down before Arnold and kiss his feet.


He became multiple mr O because he didn't mind leasing himself to old men.

Had major flaws.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: indie-lad on April 01, 2012, 10:02:08 AM

He became multiple mr O because he didn't mind leasing himself to old men.

Had major flaws.

And you will be remembered forever... ::)

Don't ever try to discredit a GOD because he is and always will be above you knave....
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: ARNIE1947 on April 01, 2012, 10:20:21 AM
 :)
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: shootfighter1 on April 01, 2012, 10:29:41 AM
I'm no fan of the excessive AS use in the sport but can you imagine what Arnold would look like with what the guys do today?  His structure would actually hold more muscle and present it well.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Bad Boy Dazza on February 13, 2013, 05:21:07 AM
---
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Papper on February 13, 2013, 06:29:45 AM
Hey ARNIE, do you know what competition these are from. I have the video, but it doesn't say where it was from. Do you think it might be the 1967 NABBA Amateur Universe?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=420514.0;attach=463734;image)

No these exact pics are from a video from the 1966 Mr Muscle. I believe.

Held in Cologne, Germany.

Franco competed too. Arnold did not win.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Bad Boy Dazza on February 13, 2013, 07:14:35 AM
--
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: wild willie on February 13, 2013, 10:31:46 AM
all pec and biceps and a huge personality
excellent calves too...
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Pet shop boys on February 13, 2013, 11:59:43 AM
 ;D
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Pet shop boys on February 13, 2013, 12:01:38 PM
excellent calves too...



WOOOSSSHHHHHHHHHHHH
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: WOOO on February 13, 2013, 06:23:28 PM
You are right.  Arnold can't match Colemans bloated GH stomach.  Arnold was silly, for some reason he preferred to have a tight, sharply defined midsection.  


Bodybuilders today are fooling themselves if they think Coleman and all the other blocky blobs are an improvement over Arnold.


 ;D
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: hazbin on February 13, 2013, 08:52:36 PM
No these exact pics are from a video from the 1966 Mr Muscle. I believe.

Held in Cologne, Germany.

Franco competed too. Arnold did not win.

funny, i was talking about this yesterday .  ( how fukked is that?)

he said the jr. mr. Europe was his first show, but he was invited. why?   because he had competed prior to that.   i had heard he lost more than just to chet, zane and Sergio.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Papper on March 28, 2013, 02:06:54 AM
funny, i was talking about this yesterday .  ( how fukked is that?)

he said the jr. mr. Europe was his first show, but he was invited. why?   because he had competed prior to that.   i had heard he lost more than just to chet, zane and Sergio.

Funny.

No I think he competed earlier, just that junior mr europe was the first title he won. He also started powerlifting earlier than bodybuilding I think so maybe that's why. I really don't know.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: Tito24 on March 28, 2013, 02:24:15 AM
pro bodybuilders look like shit nowadays.
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: gracie bjj on March 28, 2013, 05:39:47 AM
i liked the way he looked in hercules in new york, perfect build imo
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: hazbin on March 28, 2013, 11:22:31 AM
i liked the way he looked in hercules in new york, perfect build imo

yup, i remember seeing him in that little chariot in the park. his chest was crazy :o
Title: Re: Insane Arnold pic: Baddest Motherf**ker of All-Time!
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on March 28, 2013, 12:04:43 PM
yup, i remember seeing him in that little chariot in the park. his chest was crazy :o