These absolute numbers that GH15 puts out are a little odd. I agree that
they are good guidelines, but they are just that.... guidelines, not stone cold facts.
There is a hell of a lot of genetic variance in the world. Some people are naturally fat, some ripped,
some tall, etc. Why couldn't some people be able to carry more mass naturally than some other
people?
I think GH15's numbers are spot on for me, but that is just by chance. I am sure there are some guys
out there that are 220 and 10% at 5'10'' or so, without any steroids. It really isn't that far fetched to me.
I know guys that really don't know shit about steroids, and don't have the intelligence to live a lie and
honestly pretend to be dumb about AAS use. They exceed GH15's numbers. (I don't know anyone that
walks around at 6%, but they are equivalent in total mass as in 220 @ 10% or whatever).