author=OzmO link=topic=346447.msg4916967#msg4916967 date=1285465314]
Are you saying because this WTC toppled over wtc 7 should have?
First off I never said any of this, so why are you implying that I did?
Neither World Trade 1, 2 or 7 toppled over. THey were all brought down by controlled demolition and made to fall into their own footprint. Building 7 had no reason to fall at all and no one has explained why it fell when there was at best only a small fire inside the building and no plane hit it.
Why should it have and how do you know if it didn't or did?
This question shows complete retardedness. Exactly what are you asking here?
How does it not get pulverized (when should it, or even should it have?) and is it the only factor involved in the destruction of the lower undamaged floors??
The question should be why is the concrete pulverized to dust?....that has never happened before except in control demolition take downs.
"The only factor involved in the destruction of the lower floors?" You need to rephrase this question because not only does it not make sense, it seems you are just pulling things out of the air that are not relevant to the topic.