Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on December 14, 2006, 06:55:15 PM

Title: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 14, 2006, 06:55:15 PM
from MM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18197_pd.jpg)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Cap on December 14, 2006, 06:55:55 PM
from MM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18197_pd.jpg)
All drugs.  8)  What the hell is on his shoulder?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 14, 2006, 06:56:52 PM
All drugs.  8)  What the hell is on his shoulder?
unknown :-\
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Debussey on December 14, 2006, 06:56:57 PM
from MM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18197_pd.jpg)


Looks like a smelly old man.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Farcry on December 14, 2006, 06:57:27 PM
looks like a pile of poo..needs to use cell tech and nitro tech
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Cap on December 14, 2006, 06:57:52 PM
GH+Anadrol+Tren+Test is a helluva stack
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Necrosis on December 14, 2006, 06:59:32 PM
his left tit seems to be crawling away from his neck.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 14, 2006, 07:41:10 PM
haha, is he clasping hands as in a side-chest?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: UPINTHEMGUTS on December 14, 2006, 07:43:34 PM
GH+Anadrol+Tren+Test is a helluva stack

Fucking mixed cocktail of my choice!
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: ManBearPig... on December 14, 2006, 07:52:38 PM
his left tit seems to be crawling away from his neck.

you're just jealous of his physique.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: MisterMagoo on December 14, 2006, 07:53:08 PM
given his genetics, he must have spent 12 months in a hospital bed shitting in a bedpan to lose that much muscle.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Cap on December 14, 2006, 07:58:58 PM
given his genetics, he must have spent 12 months in a hospital bed shitting in a bedpan to lose that much muscle.
Yea his genetics to respond to gear...
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: ManBearPig... on December 14, 2006, 08:02:52 PM
given his genetics, he must have spent 12 months in a hospital bed shitting in a bedpan to lose that much muscle.

the term "all drugs" comes to mind.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Sergio Rules 77 on December 14, 2006, 08:19:22 PM
his left tit seems to be crawling away from his neck.

given his genetics, he must have spent 12 months in a hospital bed shitting in a bedpan to lose that much muscle.

Ha, both awesome quotes. I think I said as far back as 3 hours ago, on another thread, that Dillet had the best genetics ever, along with the Sergio. Can I take that back ;D. I've seen Samoan dudes who've never touched a weight who look a million times better than this.

SERGIO!!!
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Croatch on December 14, 2006, 08:29:50 PM
Sorry, but gaining muscle on gear is laughable.
It's like this guy at my gym who is about 260lbs. @5' 11', all bloated out, lifts like a severe pussy.  No weight, no intesity, yet still manages to get pretty big.  Guys like this make me laugh at the entire world of gear.  If I injected an old lady with a bunch of gear, she could probably bench 225lbs.  What a fucking joke.
It's cool if you go this road, but please don't think your achieving something miraculous when you put on 20lbs from a bunch of anabolics.  Dillett probably just took gear to "take his physique to the next level".  Like most guy you know...haha
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: tommywishbone on December 14, 2006, 08:46:09 PM
from MM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18197_pd.jpg)

 ;D ;D He looks like a black Homer Simpson. Where's the shot of Lee eating KFC for a comparison?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Earl1972 on December 14, 2006, 08:47:59 PM
that's what happens when you don't workout or diet

E
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 14, 2006, 08:49:31 PM
Oh but he's a black guy so it must be genetics. And the white guys just train harder.

LMAO.

These guys are all drugs.

They will all lose 50 - 75 pounds of muscle when they stop taking drugs.

Gawd bodybuilding sucks.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: saucetradomous on December 14, 2006, 08:49:47 PM
that's what happens when you don't workout, diet and stop doing steriods

E

Fixed
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Earl1972 on December 14, 2006, 08:51:12 PM
Fixed

yeah that doesn't help either but if you don't lift weights and eat high protein how can somebody expect to be noticably muscular?

E
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 14, 2006, 09:05:16 PM

Gawd bodybuilding sucks.
Not as much as white supremacists :D
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Cap on December 14, 2006, 09:05:58 PM
Not as much as white supremacists :D
?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: saucetradomous on December 14, 2006, 09:06:50 PM
yeah that doesn't help either but if you don't lift weights and eat high protein how can somebody expect to be noticably muscular?

E

But we're talking Dillet here... there's no way he can do either without it
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 14, 2006, 09:08:38 PM
?
poking fun at his sig
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: MisterMagoo on December 14, 2006, 09:10:21 PM
the term "all drugs" comes to mind.

true, but do you actually think he was taking more drugs than anyone else? he never had a belly, he never lost his hair, never showed gyno, never had a single symptom of palumboism except maybe way late in his career. but that looked more like he just wasn't preparing for the contest at all.

everyone that's talked about dillet that worked with him said he didn't need that much by way of drugs, and that he trained like an old woman. he just blew up doing nothing. maybe he was a super-responder.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: chaos on December 14, 2006, 09:12:18 PM
Not as much as white supremacists :D
>:(
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 14, 2006, 09:23:24 PM
>:(
Does that mean you'll stop posting when you hit 88  :P
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 14, 2006, 09:35:50 PM
Not as much as white supremacists :D

It's really not a choice anymore.  ;)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 14, 2006, 09:38:30 PM
All drugs.  8)  What the hell is on his shoulder?

Looks like it might be a black panther.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Cap on December 14, 2006, 09:39:35 PM
Looks like it might be a black panther.
I thought that.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 14, 2006, 09:41:15 PM
Kill whitey!
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: chaos on December 14, 2006, 09:53:09 PM
Does that mean you'll stop posting when you hit 88  :P
maybe I'll think about it at 14/88
Kill whitey!
>:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 14, 2006, 10:08:20 PM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18193_cat.jpg)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: 240 is Back on December 14, 2006, 10:10:18 PM
he's puffing his belly out - is it for an ad 'before' shot?  IMO it really cheapens ads when the subject puffs belly out.  no one really believes he went from a 55 inch to 35 inch waistline in 8 weeks, do they?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on December 14, 2006, 10:15:39 PM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18193_cat.jpg)

LOL!
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: The True Adonis on December 14, 2006, 10:24:00 PM
"All Drugs"
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 14, 2006, 10:26:40 PM
Maybe he was on weight loss drugs?

Which would make his physique in that picture also 'all drugs.'
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: brianX on December 14, 2006, 10:29:37 PM
What a genetic freak hahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahahahaha.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 14, 2006, 10:33:26 PM
LOL!
I just love this pic ;D Psycho :D
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Livewire on December 14, 2006, 10:36:25 PM
remember when priest said dillet's dosage was next to nothing?

sounds like a load of shit to me.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: ManBearPig... on December 14, 2006, 11:33:29 PM
remember when priest said dillet's dosage was next to nothing?

sounds like a load of shit to me.

lee said his dosages are next to nothing also.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 14, 2006, 11:47:15 PM
If Lee thought Paul's dosages were "next to nothing" what does that tell us about Lee?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2006, 12:10:52 AM
I believe Lee... If anyone has proved he doesn't give a shit what people think it's Lee.  I think if Lee did bigger cycles, he would say so.  Plus look how long he's been going now, he doesn't look all completely fucked like some of these guys who have done heavy cycles for years.  He still looks human, has his hair, doesn't have a head 3 times larger than it should be, can bring his gut down for competition, doesn't look older than he is. etc etc.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 15, 2006, 12:14:39 AM
The fact that he has hair really doesn't prove anything. The hair loss thing is overblown. Jay is probably on a truckload of stuff, yet he has a full head of hair. It depends on the individual. I don't see any reason to believe him. According to another thread the dude owes tons of back taxes. He acts like an ass when people try to protect him. The guy makes bad decisions. He digs his own whole. Did I mention he got an ugly ass tattoo on his face?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: SLYY on December 15, 2006, 12:16:04 AM
If you aren't going to lose your hair genetically....steroids will NOT make it fall out....
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 15, 2006, 12:20:20 AM
It's funny how every black guy is "genetics" and every white guy "trains his ass off to make up the difference." lol

All DRUGS!

ALL OF THEM!

How impressive would any of these guys be without drugs?

Would people be saying 5'5'' Dexter is impressive if he came off?

lol

He would just be an "athletic" little midget with genetics to be short.
Bodybuilding is a freak show.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2006, 12:45:21 AM
The fact that he has hair really doesn't prove anything. The hair loss thing is overblown. Jay is probably on a truckload of stuff, yet he has a full head of hair. It depends on the individual. I don't see any reason to believe him. According to another thread the dude owes tons of back taxes. He acts like an ass when people try to protect him. The guy makes bad decisions. He digs his own whole. Did I mention he got an ugly ass tattoo on his face?
I didn't put the whole case on his hair ::) more his overall appearance and yea, I could be wrong, Lee could be lying about it.  I just tend to believe him because he doesn't strike me as a person who would give a fuck if people knew he did bigger cycles and he doesn't look like Palumbu/others who appear way older than they are, have heads 3 times to big, a gut that it beyond diet and on and on, but yea I could be wrong, just a guess.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: GoneAway on December 15, 2006, 12:50:02 AM
I've seen naturals who are 5'11 and around 200 in good condition with 17" cut arms and they impress me.  You can attain a decent physique naturally, but the "wow" size factor absolutely cannot be there without hormones, period.

I pretty much agree, apart from the "wow" factor. I'm sure naturals with better-than-average genetics could compare to some pros if they trained/dieted to perfection.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 15, 2006, 01:02:20 AM
from MM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18197_pd.jpg)
is this really dillet..look at that gut :o.looks like an obese man..how old is this pic really?
can you post an after shot.that would be impressive
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: D-bol on December 15, 2006, 01:05:15 AM
The role of gear is overrated imo...

You can pop all gear you want, but if you have shit genes and/or havent reached your max natural gains it won't make you look like a pro. As someone said, you'll be puffed up and blotted. In the 70's pros prolly ised 20% of what is used today, mainly orals like d-bol, and still managed to look excellent (arnie, franco, nubret, etc)

Gear is just an icing on the cake, the cherry on top, not the whole thing. Genes, stamina, determination, and discipline - thats the real tools.

Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Figo on December 15, 2006, 01:23:14 AM
The role of gear is overrated imo...

You can pop all gear you want, but if you have shit genes and/or havent reached your max natural gains it won't make you look like a pro. As someone said, you'll be puffed up and blotted. In the 70's pros prolly ised 20% of what is used today, mainly orals like d-bol, and still managed to look excellent (arnie, franco, nubret, etc)

Gear is just an icing on the cake, the cherry on top, not the whole thing. Genes, stamina, determination, and discipline - thats the real tools.



I agree, as much as whoever is using or how good the genes are, you still gotta train, eat, etc.

This before  Dillett shot is shocking, especially in light of how good(for age and wear and tear)he looked after!

Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 02:39:05 AM
is this really dillet..look at that gut :o.looks like an obese man..how old is this pic really?
can you post an after shot.that would be impressive
.

Fuck you're stupid ::)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: slaveboy1980 on December 15, 2006, 04:06:01 AM
.

f**k you're stupid ::)

didnt you know that? shadow is the kind of person that a girl could make him do anything for her..he would devour his on feces for a woman, and blow a 58 year old trucker named conrad mermelson.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 04:19:10 AM
didnt you know that? shadow is the kind of person that a girl could make him do anything for her..he would devour his on feces for a woman, and blow a 58 year old trucker named conrad mermelson.


I've been a regular browser of these boards for years so I well remember the shadow's arrival- but he just kind of snuk up on me. I don't recall him being this stupid at the beginning of his posting career.

It's strange, because we all know his stupid, but then he goes and posts a real breathtaking gem which is just so dumbfoundingly retarded it leaves me wondering- is this a human or some kind of dextrous chimpanzee we're talking to?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: slaveboy1980 on December 15, 2006, 04:24:34 AM
maybe its virginitis? virginal induced madness?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: MikeThaMachine on December 15, 2006, 05:00:57 AM

I've been a regular browser of these boards for years so I well remember the shadow's arrival- but he just kind of snuk up on me. I don't recall him being this stupid at the beginning of his posting career.

It's strange, because we all know his stupid, but then he goes and posts a real breathtaking gem which is just so dumbfoundingly retarded it leaves me wondering- is this a human or some kind of dextrous chimpanzee we're talking to?

Shadow seemed very normal in the beginning, you know just another BBing fan with intelligent arguments but over the past month or two things have really turned upside down. He now rants on and on with the most retarded posts I have seen as of late and meltsdown on an hourly basis. What the hell happened to him, maybe he used to be on medication and never got his shit refilled, I don't know but he hasn't been sane for a while now.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Parker on December 15, 2006, 05:05:38 AM
The pic reminds me of the pic tures of Lee when he went hog wild, and was a 270+ pound  KFC eating machine. That round mound of batter and chicken grease seriously transformed.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: dr.chimps on December 15, 2006, 05:10:32 AM

I've been a regular browser of these boards for years so I well remember the shadow's arrival- but he just kind of snuk up on me. I don't recall him being this stupid at the beginning of his posting career.

It's strange, because we all know his stupid, but then he goes and posts a real breathtaking gem which is just so dumbfoundingly retarded it leaves me wondering- is this a human or some kind of dextrous chimpanzee we're talking to?
Well, logical? you've certainly hit the ground running, what with 63+ posts per day.  :o  I don't think even Lucious Fox (is he still around?) hit that mark when he was on his religious kick.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Playboy on December 15, 2006, 05:11:26 AM
The pic reminds me of the pic tures of Lee when he went hog wild, and was a 270+ pound  KFC eating machine. That round mound of batter and chicken grease seriously transformed.
Yup. Scary pic...thats for sure. I saw him at the Montreal show in september. He looked alright. There should be pics of him in that show on the contests or bbdg board. Itook a tone of drugs for him to get about 75% of that freaky look he had back. Too bad....stick a fork in him. He's done.

PB
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 15, 2006, 05:14:34 AM
didnt you know that? shadow is the kind of person that a girl could make him do anything for her..he would devour his on feces for a woman, and blow a 58 year old trucker named conrad mermelson.
don't tell me about your sexual experiences with a trucker named conrad mermelson..you even knew his age..wow
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 05:15:43 AM
Well, logical? you've certainly hit the ground running, what with 63+ posts per day.  :o  I don't think even Lucious Fox (is he still around?) hit that mark when he was on his religious kick.


No way, I think he peaked at around 50 posts a day  ;D


Kinda funny watching the board change. Just recently, two members- rehtaf ruo and bro_in_the_know- made comebacks after long spells away and pretty much no one knew who they were. Sad, beceause rehtaf ruo was one of the funniest mathafackas on the net  ;D

beef it betil and his crazy ass pecs ;D
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 15, 2006, 05:16:42 AM
Shadow seemed very normal in the beginning, you know just another BBing fan with intelligent arguments but over the past month or two things have really turned upside down. He now rants on and on with the most retarded posts I have seen as of late and meltsdown on an hourly basis. What the hell happened to him, maybe he used to be on medication and never got his shit refilled, I don't know but he hasn't been sane for a while now.
don't tell me what happened to you when you were a kid..your father fingered you alot i guess
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 05:17:10 AM
Shadow seemed very normal in the beginning, you know just another BBing fan with intelligent arguments but over the past month or two things have really turned upside down. He now rants on and on with the most retarded posts I have seen as of late and meltsdown on an hourly basis. What the hell happened to him, maybe he used to be on medication and never got his shit refilled, I don't know but he hasn't been sane for a while now.


I think he just went on a power trip. He probably figured out the anonymity of the board and that he could get away with saying anything. Maybe he's submissive offline and needs somewhere to vent up all that pent up frustration and rage at being exploited and manipulated- his attitude to women says alot about him.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 05:18:00 AM
don't tell me what happened to you when you were a kid..your father fingered you alot i guess

BLAH BLAH BLAH


We're trying to have an intelligent conversation here, so,


GET THE FUCK OUT OF OUR THRAED
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 15, 2006, 05:20:23 AM

I think he just went on a power trip. He probably figured out the anonymity of the board and that he could get away with saying anything. Maybe he's submissive offline and needs somewhere to vent up all that pent up frustration and rage at being exploited and manipulated- his attitude to women says alot about him.
my attitude towards women is perfectly fine..its your attitude that makes me wanna punch you in the face you logical douche bag
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 05:22:03 AM
my attitude towards women is perfectly fine..its your attitude that makes me wanna punch you in the face you logical douche bag


See, tries to be dominant online but has no experience with ever being in a position of power due to his submissive nature, so his threats carry no weight and are constantly laughed at.

So, shut the fuck up you pathetic weakling.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: MikeThaMachine on December 15, 2006, 05:24:23 AM
don't tell me what happened to you when you were a kid..your father fingered you alot i guess

This is exactly what I am talking about, I may joke with you now and then but you always seem to come at me with some vulgar ass shit and go way over the line (like there is a line here ;D). Seriously am I one of the guys that follows you from thread to thread harassing you.... NO, yet you still get all offended if I say anything about you. What happened to you really, you have changed from a normal member into a complete weirdo like DA, Debussey or db2431 whatever the fuck his name is.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 05:25:25 AM
This is exactly what I am talking about, I may joke with you now and then but you always seem to come at me with some vulgar ass shit and go way over the line (like there is a line here ;D). Seriously am I one of the guys that follows you from thread to thread harassing you.... NO, yet you still get all offended if I say anything about you. What happened to you really, you have changed from a normal member into a complete weirdo like DA, Debussey or db2431 whatever the f**k his name is.


Yes. Shadow, you might find that if you started talking and treating other members respectfully, they will respond accordingly.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: smaul on December 15, 2006, 05:42:31 AM
my attitude towards women is perfectly fine..its your attitude that makes me wanna punch you in the face you logical douche bag

Never thought I'd hear the words logical douche bag used as an insult
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Bronx on December 15, 2006, 05:49:09 AM
given his genetics, he must have spent 12 months in a hospital bed shitting in a bedpan to lose that much muscle.

Actually...Paul probably has some of the best genetics in the world when it comes to bodybuilders. From day one of him walking into the Weider offices at 18, he was a beast. And it's pretty well known that his use of gear is some of the smallest amounts around.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 05:52:17 AM
Never thought I'd hear the words logical douche bag used as an insult


LOL, does sound kinda weak doesn't it?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 15, 2006, 05:57:38 AM
This is exactly what I am talking about, I may joke with you now and then but you always seem to come at me with some vulgar ass shit and go way over the line (like there is a line here ;D). Seriously am I one of the guys that follows you from thread to thread harassing you.... NO, yet you still get all offended if I say anything about you. What happened to you really, you have changed from a normal member into a complete weirdo like DA, Debussey or db2431 whatever the f**k his name is.
hahaha..do you take my comments seriously.hahahahah.dude i am a normal member.sometimes only talking about 24/7 sometimes gets a bit boring.my vulgar ass comments are just for laughs and nothing else..i am sorry if you feel offended.dude why do you take this place seriously.i just have a little fun time to time with you guys..i ain't like this in real life..this is just non-sense board talk..who gives a shit anyways..i don't feel offended by your comments..if fact i enjoy them.i am cool with it
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 05:59:58 AM
hahaha..do you take my comments seriously.hahahahah.dude i am a normal member.sometimes only talking about 24/7 sometimes gets a bit boring.my vulgar ass comments are just for laughs and nothing else..i am sorry if you feel offended.dude why do you take this place seriously.i just have a little fun time to time with you guys..i ain't like this in real life..this is just non-sense board talk..who gives a shit anyways..i don't feel offended by your comments..if fact i enjoy them.i am cool with it


So there is intelligence in there somewhere after all?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: SteelePegasus on December 15, 2006, 06:00:55 AM
The pic reminds me of the pic tures of Lee when he went hog wild, and was a 270+ pound  KFC eating machine. That round mound of batter and chicken grease seriously transformed.

this is differrent, In Lee's case he had some size you can clearly see that he was big but covered with alot of fat, he arms were still huge

In this case Dillet has zero muscle
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 15, 2006, 06:03:15 AM

So there is intelligence in there somewhere after all?
lol.. ;).dude i am really amazed to see that you guys take my stupid bashing seriously.like i said before this is just board talk.when i get bored i come here and pull someones leg and get my own leg pulled..its all good
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: SteelePegasus on December 15, 2006, 06:07:30 AM
Personally I find this impressive......

I am impressed by his response to gear. Not everyone can have a before and after shots that impressive in that short a period of time.

There are tons of mother fuckers on site that on a gear and can't approach dillet

They eat better, train harder, take more gear and still look like crap.  And here is this fat old man with superior genetic responders...amazing
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: SteelePegasus on December 15, 2006, 06:09:34 AM
And can we get off of the "all drugs" already....you cannot be a pro without..lets move on

you cannot be a race car driver without a car. And not every race car driver is a winner
you cannot be a baseball player without a bat. And not every baseball player is star
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 15, 2006, 06:15:22 AM
Personally I find this impressive......

I am impressed by his response to gear. Not everyone can have a before and after shots that impressive in that short a period of time.

There are tons of mother fuckers on site that on a gear and can't approach dillet

They eat better, train harder, take more gear and still look like crap.  And here is this fat old man with superior genetic responders...amazing
drugs or not you still gotta train your ass off in the gym
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: MikeThaMachine on December 15, 2006, 06:18:46 AM
hahaha..do you take my comments seriously.hahahahah.dude i am a normal member.sometimes only talking about 24/7 sometimes gets a bit boring.my vulgar ass comments are just for laughs and nothing else..i am sorry if you feel offended.dude why do you take this place seriously.i just have a little fun time to time with you guys..i ain't like this in real life..this is just non-sense board talk..who gives a shit anyways..i don't feel offended by your comments..if fact i enjoy them.i am cool with it

Well that's good to hear but to tell you the truth until you just wrote that no one on here ever thought you were just joking, seriously you write so much stupid crap that it's hard to tell when you are joking and when you are having another meltdown. Well either way you should watch the context in which you write your comments and go fuck your mother shit face.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: chainsaw on December 15, 2006, 06:19:49 AM
I can't believe that this is the same guy.  His head even shrunk.  If he would have video'd his cycle of atrophy everyday, he'd be a rich man now.  And if he got back into great shape and video'd that, he could be on OPRAH!
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 15, 2006, 06:27:12 AM
Well that's good to hear but to tell you the truth until you just wrote that no one on here ever thought you were just joking, seriously you write so much stupid crap that it's hard to tell when you are joking and when you are having another meltdown. Well either way you should watch the context in which you write your comments and go f**k your mother shit face.
lol...meltdown..your too funny dude.who gives a shit about 'meltdowns' anyways..meltdowns are fun dude.i love melting down
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: SteelePegasus on December 15, 2006, 06:27:39 AM
drugs or not you still gotta train your ass off in the gym

not true..someone stated earlier that Dillet wasn't the hardest trainer. Same goes for Cormier and others.

what am i saying is that the rules for naturals and non naturals are different. With those guys it is all about how their body responds to the gear, then training and then maybe diet

(but I would argue that they can still eat crap and train like crap and get great results)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: MikeThaMachine on December 15, 2006, 06:30:12 AM
lol...meltdown..your too funny dude.who gives a shit about 'meltdowns' anyways..meltdowns are fun dude.i love melting down

MELTDOWN :o
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Heywood on December 15, 2006, 07:37:36 AM
"Drugs are 15%" - the statement is meaningless.

Yes, you still have to train, diet, work hard, etc., etc., etc.,

The point is, you get there on a rocket ship rather than in a horse drawn buggy.  (Of course you lose it the same way).




Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Adam Empire on December 15, 2006, 09:06:34 AM
from MM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18197_pd.jpg)

The ironic thing is that his before before picture will look the same as his after after picture.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Croatch on December 15, 2006, 09:50:35 AM
Quote
drugs or not you still gotta train your ass off in the gym
Incorrect.  I see guys who are very big and train like complete pussies.  I've got zero respect for these clowns and their "mind muscle" connection.  The reason most people don't train natural is because they can't.
Roids are for little boys trying to look like men.  Enough.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: tommywishbone on December 15, 2006, 11:10:42 AM
(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18193_cat.jpg)

That kitten doesn't scare me... much.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Dredlock Rasta on December 15, 2006, 05:46:13 PM
The ironic thing is that his before before picture will look the same as his after after picture.

Why is he trying to pose? If he poses he should at least put some effort into it like if he was in a show.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 15, 2006, 05:46:58 PM
I doubt that pics's accurate.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2006, 05:49:48 PM
I doubt that pics's accurate.
What like photoshoped ::)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 15, 2006, 05:53:56 PM
lol.. ;).dude i am really amazed to see that you guys take my stupid bashing seriously.like i said before this is just board talk.when i get bored i come here and pull someones leg and get my own leg pulled..its all good


It's probably because you do it with unceasing abandon- you post like this 24/7, so we think it's normal for you. You should try and post normally, I'm interested to see what it's like.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Adam Empire on December 15, 2006, 07:32:30 PM
What like photoshoped ::)

It looks "Muscleteched".  The art of making an athlete look like shit in before pics.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 15, 2006, 11:45:03 PM
It looks "Muscleteched".  The art of making an athlete look like shit in before pics.
I think he's sticking his gut out, but that's not the before pic from the ads.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Tombo on December 16, 2006, 12:51:38 AM
lol he looks like he has tits there
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Scimowser on December 16, 2006, 01:32:56 AM
....  ::)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 16, 2006, 09:08:33 AM
What a genetic freak!!!!!!!

OMGZ!!!!

Lmao.


See, tries to be dominant online but has no experience with ever being in a position of power due to his submissive nature, so his threats carry no weight and are constantly laughed at.

So, shut the f**k up you pathetic weakling.

hahaha.

I think you got him here.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: oldtimer1 on December 16, 2006, 10:02:33 AM
How many stars look bad just 6 months off drugs?  Juicers want credit for something they didn't earn.  A juicer has temporary muscles. They will rationalize that it isn't true to protect their fragile ego.  I live by the beach and every summer I see the new batch of chemical wonders.  Everyone including 80 year old grandmas know the truth about these cosmetic chemical muscles in a syringe wonders got there.

 I have been around enough to see the same pattern.  A college guy juices on and off for years.  When most hit their 30's they stop using due to health, financial, or legal reasons.  Many threw away their education and career pursuing their drugs.  Almost all users eventually start selling.  It might be a small amount or large.  Have you ever run into a steroid dealer that only dealt in roids?  It's only one of their many products.  Just like any other drug dealer it's core involves violence when it comes to money. It's sad that this sub culture of a sport attracts so many insecure young men that would sacrifice health to impress fools.

Train natural.  Your physique will be there for you whole life.  It won't just be there depending on what cycle your on.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 16, 2006, 10:06:55 AM
How many stars look bad just 6 months off drugs?  Juicers want credit for something they didn't earn.  A juicer has temporary muscles. They will rationalize that it isn't true to protect their fragile ego.  I live by the beach and every summer I see the new batch of chemical wonders.  Everyone including 80 year old grandmas know the truth about these cosmetic chemical muscles in a syringe wonders got there.

 I have been around enough to see the same pattern.  A college guy juices on and off for years.  When most hit their 30's they stop using due to health, financial, or legal reasons.  Many threw away their education and career pursuing their drugs.  Almost all users eventually start selling.  It might be a small amount or large.  Have you ever run into a steroid dealer that only dealt in roids?  It's only one of their many products.  Just like any other drug dealer it's core involves violence when it comes to money. It's sad that this sub culture of a sport attracts so many insecure young men that would sacrifice health to impress fools.

Train natural.  Your physique will be there for you whole life.  It won't just be there depending on what cycle your on.

Exactly. Natural gains stay with you for a long time. Look at any guy that works with his hands... Great forearm development, even though half these guys are in their 40s and never touched a drug in their lives. Look at lumpers...huge shoulders. Natural gains don't disappear.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: disco_stu on December 16, 2006, 12:53:32 PM
Oh but he's a black guy so it must be genetics. And the white guys just train harder.

LMAO.

These guys are all drugs.

They will all lose 50 - 75 pounds of muscle when they stop taking drugs.

Gawd bodybuilding sucks.

exactly....

Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hulkster on December 16, 2006, 01:09:35 PM
two sets of "before" pictues...

oh wait....

 ;D
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: bmacsys on December 16, 2006, 01:14:40 PM
given his genetics, he must have spent 12 months in a hospital bed shitting in a bedpan to lose that much muscle.

Without roids he is just a regular Joe. Get over it. Natural he is nothing. Just like the most of these guys.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Scimowser on December 16, 2006, 01:28:36 PM
two sets of "before" pictues...

oh wait....

 ;D

oh noooooooo, do you realise what you have done! Open the door for yet another barrage of pics showing a fat ronnie and an out of shape dorian. Maybe now we will get to see them for a millionth time and find something new in the pic that weve previously missed!
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Earl1972 on December 16, 2006, 01:40:31 PM

Train natural.  Your physique will be there for you whole life.  It won't just be there depending on what cycle your on.


hahahahah in what fantasy world is that true? please point me in the direction ::)

E
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Earl1972 on December 16, 2006, 01:41:31 PM
Exactly. Natural gains stay with you for a long time. Look at any guy that works with his hands... Great forearm development, even though half these guys are in their 40s and never touched a drug in their lives. Look at lumpers...huge shoulders. Natural gains don't disappear.

hahahaha and somebody actually agreed hahaha

I love getbig ;D

E
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 16, 2006, 01:49:19 PM
Look at Reg Park and Steeve Reeves.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Earl1972 on December 16, 2006, 02:10:08 PM
Look at Reg Park and Steeve Reeves.

ok

now what?

E
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Heywood on December 16, 2006, 04:00:22 PM
ok

now what?

E


Meaning that their size and strength was never dependent on knowing some guy who sold his merchandise out of a van parked at the gym.




Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 16, 2006, 04:08:14 PM
It was once said that steroid testing was the emasculation of the Gods lol
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Heywood on December 16, 2006, 04:13:31 PM
Obviously bad lighting.  VERY, VERY bad lighting....
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: gordiano on December 16, 2006, 05:48:03 PM
How many stars look bad just 6 months off drugs?  Juicers want credit for something they didn't earn.  A juicer has temporary muscles. They will rationalize that it isn't true to protect their fragile ego.  I live by the beach and every summer I see the new batch of chemical wonders.  Everyone including 80 year old grandmas know the truth about these cosmetic chemical muscles in a syringe wonders got there.

 I have been around enough to see the same pattern.  A college guy juices on and off for years.  When most hit their 30's they stop using due to health, financial, or legal reasons.  Many threw away their education and career pursuing their drugs.  Almost all users eventually start selling.  It might be a small amount or large.  Have you ever run into a steroid dealer that only dealt in roids?  It's only one of their many products.  Just like any other drug dealer it's core involves violence when it comes to money. It's sad that this sub culture of a sport attracts so many insecure young men that would sacrifice health to impress fools.

Train natural.  Your physique will be there for you whole life.  It won't just be there depending on what cycle your on.

Monster truth................... ....
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 16, 2006, 05:52:46 PM
Post-hormone tennis-player look. There *are* some guys past & present that are still impressive, then there are the hyper-responders.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 16, 2006, 05:55:23 PM
Post-hormone tennis-player look. There *are* some guys past & present that are still impressive, then there are the hyper-responders.

You're so predictable lol
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Earl1972 on December 16, 2006, 06:54:51 PM

Meaning that their size and strength was never dependent on knowing some guy who sold his merchandise out of a van parked at the gym.






was their "natural" physique there for life?

E
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Heywood on December 16, 2006, 07:10:47 PM
was their "natural" physique there for life?

E

If they continue to train naturally, they can keep a good physique for decades.  If they do it with drugs, the size plummets, regardless of whatever else they do.  Otherwise, the drug taking would be a one-time process. 







Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: DIVISION on December 16, 2006, 07:14:55 PM
What makes you think Arnold was a hyper-responder pumpster?  ???

ehh....

Arnold was not a hyper-responder.

He megadosed on D-bol and Test for the early portion of his career and we all saw what he looked like a few years ago on the beach in a thong post-surgery.

He's not a hyper-responder.......



DIV
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: gtbro1 on December 16, 2006, 07:28:30 PM
Not as much as white supremacists :D


WHITE POOOOOWWWEEERRRR!!!!!  :P





Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 16, 2006, 07:30:57 PM
What makes you think Arnold was a hyper-responder pumpster?  ???


Isn't a hyper-responder someone who has a not so outstanding physique natural, but can gain extremely quickly and a large amount on a small-medium cycle?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on December 16, 2006, 07:33:58 PM
hahaha he should just die
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: DIVISION on December 16, 2006, 07:34:43 PM

Isn't a hyper-responder someone who has a not so outstanding physique natural, but can gain extremely quickly and a large amount on a small-medium cycle?

Arnold has good genetics.........and he megadosed over a period of years.

He wasn't a hyper-responder.





DIV
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Hugo Chavez on December 16, 2006, 07:35:07 PM
At least Arnold didn't turn into a complete pile of poo back in the day on a layoff from the gym...
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 16, 2006, 09:07:21 PM
Arnold "off" still had a great body. He didn't look huge or anything, but still you can see he's naturally athletic.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: honest on December 16, 2006, 11:15:43 PM
I was around the venice scene when Paul was at his best, he ate hardly anything and his gear use in comparision to guys like Flex was like 50 to 75% less, that is a fact.

the guy has great genetics, dont get me wrong hes a prick who never paid for his stuff from the guys who supplied him but if he trained natural he would still be the freakiest natural out there in that photo he clearly hasnt trained in ages and in a full body shot i would say he would look less fat and would still be 245+
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 16, 2006, 11:18:04 PM
I was around the venice scene when Paul was at his best, he ate hardly anything and his gear use in comparision to guys like Flex was like 50 to 75% less, that is a fact.

the guy has great genetics, dont get me wrong hes a prick who never paid for his stuff from the guys who supplied him but if he trained natural he would still be the freakiest natural out there in that photo he clearly hasnt trained in ages and in a full body shot i would say he would look less fat and would still be 245+





















HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH AH!@!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!*!()!*!!!!!!!!11

Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 16, 2006, 11:35:30 PM
Arnold "off" still had a great body. He didn't look huge or anything, but still you can see he's naturally athletic.


Yes, agree with this- athletic. But it doesn't look like he had incredible genes for natural muscle development.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 16, 2006, 11:39:07 PM
Arnold has good genetics.........and he megadosed over a period of years.

He wasn't a hyper-responder.

DIV
On the contrary, he was a hyper-responder to drugs. The doses are a separate issue; the variance in amounts used doesn't negative the fact of being a hyper-responder to drugs. That's aside from the fact that doses weren't an exact science anyway, especially in the 60s. Schwarzenegger might well have grown on half the amounts he used; it's not as if the doses used were arrived at by any logical process.

Had most of the gains been natural, more of the size would've been retained off hormones, and the weight swings wouldn't be so drastic. He looked ok without them but the difference was disappointing, as if most of the greatness was unnatural. He looked ok off cycle, as shown in the pic.

As far as athleticism, it was his lack thereof that led him away from soccer; wasn't just an interest in individual sports. There's no sign of any particular talent there, as seen in various filmed news pieces of his lumbering gait as governor. A natural athlete in middle-age would not walk that way sans injuries.

Dillet no doubt had great genetics with or without drugs; to reduce it to drug intake's simplistic.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 17, 2006, 12:04:57 AM
On the contrary, he was a hyper-responder to drugs. The doses aren't the point and aren't an exact science anyway. Schwarzenegger might well have grown on half the amounts he used; it's not as if the doses used were arrived at by any logical process.

Had most of the gains been natural, more of the size would've been retained off hormones, and the weight swings wouldn't be so drastic. He looked ok without them but the difference was disappointing, as if most of the greatness was unnatural. He looked ok off cycle, as shown in the pic.

As far as athleticism, it was his lack thereof that led him away from soccer; wasn't just an interest in individual sports. There's no sign of any particular talent there, as seen in various news pieces of his lumbering gait as governor. A natural athlete in middle-age would not walk that way sans injuries.

Dillet no doubt had great genetics with or without drugs; to reduce it to drug intake's simplistic.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=112892.0;attach=127421;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=112892.0;attach=127420;image)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 17, 2006, 12:13:30 AM
Aside from the horrible bod in a pic taken when he was only in his early 50s, that stance in the "now" pic is an example of the ackward slightly lumbering gait. Nothing to do with a natural athlete. ;)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 17, 2006, 12:16:05 AM
.

He's in his mid 50s and just had heart surgery.  ::)

Face it, these guys are all drugs. If they weren't, they wouldn't disolve and lose 50 - 75 pounds of muscle when they retire. There are plenty of people that look like flabby Dillet. I guess he's not that special genetically. If their genetics were so superior they would be making money in pro sports like football, boxing, baseball, etc..
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 17, 2006, 12:17:11 AM
He's in his mid 50s and just had heart surgery.  ::)

Face it, these guys are all drugs. If they weren't, they wouldn't disolve and lose 50 - 75 pounds of muscle when they retire. There are plenty of people that look like flabby Dillet. I guess he's not that special genetically. If their genetics were so superior they would be making money in pro sports like football, boxing, baseball, etc..



When a lifetime natural who's been training and eating for 15 years suddenly stops, after a while he'll lose all his gains too.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 17, 2006, 12:20:29 AM


When a lifetime natural who's been training and eating for 15 years suddenly stops, after a while he'll lose all his gains too.

Not NEARLY as fast. Not even close. I know people that trained natural all their lives and they still look built into their 50s.

That's beside the point though...

The point is, a so-called genetic freak is exposed as a chemical monster with average genetics.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: the shadow on December 17, 2006, 12:30:14 AM
how old are these pauls before before pic..???
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 17, 2006, 01:58:53 AM
Not NEARLY as fast. Not even close. I know people that trained natural all their lives and they still look built into their 50s.

That's beside the point though...

The point is, a so-called genetic freak is exposed as a chemical monster with average genetics.



Well, not really. The point is that he's a hyper-responder. That means he has incredible genetics to gain alot of muscle, quickly, off gear, perhaps as has been reported several times, on medium cycles or less.

It's got nothing to do with his capacity to gain muscle off-cycle- that's not what good response to AAS genetics means.

Genetic freak means a hyper responder. Paul is a hyper responder. So, Paul is a genetic freak.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 17, 2006, 02:33:01 AM
Nobody is impressed by that. So what? The guy responds to steroids.

You have no idea if he's a hyper responder or not. He's probably on a ton of stuff when he's preparing for a contest. You have no idea what he takes.

The bottom line is, he looks like crap without drugs. That's always been the point. Without drugs he's nothing.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: logical? on December 17, 2006, 02:39:48 AM
Nobody is impressed by that. So what? The guy responds to steroids.

You have no idea if he's a hyper responder or not. He's probably on a ton of stuff when he's preparing for a contest. You have no idea what he takes.

The bottom line is, he looks like crap without drugs. That's always been the point. Without drugs he's nothing.


I'm impressed. I look at that picture, and some of his past showings, and I think, fuck, that's one hell of an impressive physique.

I don't give a shit whether he looks good with drugs or without them- he's never trained natural (as far as we know) so we are in no position to say how he'd look like without them. The taboo about AAS is far overblown- he could be on 10g of test a day for all I care, the final result is an awesome physique.

And he placed top 6 in the world on multiple occasions, never being able to pose for shit. The judges were obviously impressed.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 17, 2006, 05:36:25 AM
Nobody is impressed by that. So what? The guy responds to steroids.

You have no idea if he's a hyper responder or not. He's probably on a ton of stuff when he's preparing for a contest. You have no idea what he takes.

The bottom line is, he looks like crap without drugs. That's always been the point. Without drugs he's nothing.
What's striking is your hate for Dillet and Schwarzenegger ball-worship. An insane dichotomy; they both took the drug cocktails of their day with no reservation.

Any criticism of either should factor in what has been going on in their lives that led one or the other to maintain (or not). Schwarzenegger seems to have gotten in shape as needed for movies, otherwise could look like crap as well, including those beach shots from not long ago that had nothing to do with the surgery excuse.

Funny this confusion over steroid response: the dosages used might've varied but whatever amounts used is secondary to the fact that there was a drastic change in appearance.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: beatmaster on December 17, 2006, 08:02:03 AM

omg, the before pic of paul, he looks like an average joe drinking beer and whatching tv.
thats what happen when you get off the sauce and training.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: DIVISION on December 17, 2006, 08:58:35 AM
On the contrary, he was a hyper-responder to drugs. The doses are a separate issue; the variance in amounts used doesn't negative the fact of being a hyper-responder to drugs. That's aside from the fact that doses weren't an exact science anyway, especially in the 60s. Schwarzenegger might well have grown on half the amounts he used; it's not as if the doses used were arrived at by any logical process.

Had most of the gains been natural, more of the size would've been retained off hormones, and the weight swings wouldn't be so drastic. He looked ok without them but the difference was disappointing, as if most of the greatness was unnatural. He looked ok off cycle, as shown in the pic.

As far as athleticism, it was his lack thereof that led him away from soccer; wasn't just an interest in individual sports. There's no sign of any particular talent there, as seen in various filmed news pieces of his lumbering gait as governor. A natural athlete in middle-age would not walk that way sans injuries.

Dillet no doubt had great genetics with or without drugs; to reduce it to drug intake's simplistic.

I've got more experience dealing with bodybuilders and cycles than you do, lil' pumpster.

You stick to bodybuilding threads and I'll stick to AAS.

Arnold was no hyper-responder.

Levrone was a good example of a hyper-responder...

That picture of Arnold at the beach was as an old broken down man, no longer using AAS.

That has nothing to do with the question of how his body reacted to the drugs in his prime.



DIV
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 17, 2006, 09:19:15 AM
I've got more experience dealing with bodybuilders and cycles than you do, lil' pumpster.

You stick to bodybuilding threads and I'll stick to AAS.

Arnold was no hyper-responder.

Levrone was a good example of a hyper-responder...

That picture of Arnold at the beach was as an old broken down man, no longer using AAS.

That has nothing to do with the question of how his body reacted to the drugs in his prime.


DIV
"DIV" with continued imperiousness now resorting to infantile pissing contests in lieu of content. "I have more experience than you" trumps any evidence to back up very general claims that are supposed to be believe "because he says so". hahahahahaahhaah. I'm sure he has much more experience with roids, because he needed them himself more than I ever did.

Back up what is being said with solid evidence of being there with Arnold in his teens, what was being taken and the response to it. So far that's absent, leaving only the arrogance in evidence. Much of this is common sense and you weren't there when either one was 18 on their cycles-you don't know all the facts either, arrogant one.

As already mentioned and ignored by you, discern between absolute & relative response-whatever the doses taken, if someone responds drastically it is not for you to decide which were the responders. The first pic provided was Schwarzenegger around age 30. In the other he was only in his early 50s.

Get off your soapbox, unless you can come up with specifics to prove what is so far your rampant speculation, son.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Earl1972 on December 17, 2006, 12:10:58 PM
If they continue to train naturally, they can keep a good physique for decades.  If they do it with drugs, the size plummets, regardless of whatever else they do.  Otherwise, the drug taking would be a one-time process. 









yeah that is true if they continue to train but he said a natural physique is forever

if you don't continue to train or eat a high protein diet you will shrink back to your normal size, natural or not

E
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Cap on December 17, 2006, 12:21:08 PM
If super genetics mean hyper responder does that mean that people who respond to Advil or Ritalin are genetic freaks?  By some posts that's what people will have you believe.  Some bodies just get a lucky draw with some or all compunds.  However, if you megadose like most of these guys, you will respond genetics or otherwise.  When pros say that they know guys in the gym that take more than them then they must be loaded gym rats because I doubt the average AAS user has GH, slin and gram upon gram of test in his body on a daily/weekly/monthly/yearly basis.  To me, it is just another ploy to make us believe that they are superior to everyone else but when you see pics of Dillet like this you know it's 99% BS.  There are some like Lee P who were freaks from a young clean age but they are few and far between.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on December 17, 2006, 01:26:21 PM
Arnold "off" still had a great body. He didn't look huge or anything, but still you can see he's naturally athletic.

Arnold looked like shit when he was "off".

(http://i16.tinypic.com/4iesy7n.jpg)
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 17, 2006, 01:38:11 PM
Arnold looked like shit when he was "off".

(http://i16.tinypic.com/4iesy7n.jpg)

Thank you. This "looked great" crap sounds like "Bluto" worshipping Stallone's balls. Schwarzenegger almost looks feminine without hormones, it's disturbing.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 17, 2006, 01:44:03 PM
Thank you. This "looked great" crap sounds like "Bluto" worshipping Stallone's balls. Schwarzenegger almost looks feminine without hormones, it's disturbing.

You don't think he looks better than guys like Tom Prince of Levrone when he off? or at least just as good?
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Heywood on December 17, 2006, 01:47:41 PM
yeah that is true if they continue to train but he said a natural physique is forever

if you don't continue to train or eat a high protein diet you will shrink back to your normal size, natural or not

E


Earl, let's not make this so complicated:

With drugs, you can build great size and strength quickly, which is dependent on the drugs to maintain, regardless of continued training & eating.  Gains are lost as quickly as they are gained.

If natural, gains come much slower and are hard fought, but your baseline size and strength can be maintained by continued training and eating, and are slow to lose.








Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 17, 2006, 01:49:14 PM
You don't think he looks better than guys like Tom Prince of Levrone when he off? or at least just as good?
They all look healthy, it's the best way to look from a health point of view, whereas from a fan's perspective it's  sad to see muscle disappear to the point that it looks like another person.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 17, 2006, 01:50:22 PM
They all look healthy, it's the best way to look from a health point of view, whereas from a fan's perspective it's  sad to see muscle disappear to the point that it looks like another person.

Well thats true but no one can stay that big forever , everyone has to come back at some time.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: pumpster on December 17, 2006, 01:58:22 PM
Well thats true but no one can stay that big forever , everyone has to come back at some time.
Not to retain at least some of the size looks odd to begin with; the weight loss is usually extreme. On top of that, possibly due to imbalances caused by long-term hormone use & estrogen rebalancing, some seem to lose a degree of masculine qualities.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Playboy on December 18, 2006, 05:55:12 AM
Aside from the horrible bod in a pic taken when he was only in his early 50s, that stance in the "now" pic is an example of the ackward slightly lumbering gait. Nothing to do with a natural athlete. ;)
Arnold is a sixty year old man who has already had a stellar bbdg career not to mention movie star and governer. You cannot compare Dillet to Arnold. What is Dillets excuse???

PB
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: Tombo on December 19, 2006, 07:10:39 AM
Arnold looked like shit when he was "off".

(http://i16.tinypic.com/4iesy7n.jpg)

if thats 'shit' then dear got i wouldnt mind stepping in it and having some rub off onto me

you're a tard! hooray!
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: rockyfortune on December 19, 2006, 07:22:14 AM
the funniest bulls**t about that dillet articles was where he said he started taking muscletech products and his bench went up 130lbs in 6 weeks or some s**t like that..i'm wondering what muscletech product that was...
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: natural al on December 19, 2006, 07:32:32 AM
I watched the 2 BFTO segments I have with paul on them last night just for shits and giggles.  The first one starts off with paul on the scale he's weighing in at 286lbs and honestly looks big as hell.  He's training back with Charles Glass and he's 18 days out.  Honestly, he's training like a complete pussy, he's doing alot of "uhhhsss" when they're doing pulldowns but he's lucky if he has 100lbs on the machine.  Then he pops up and makes a few more faces and turns around and does a different type of pulldown, seems they're supersetting pulldowns facing the stack and pulldowns away from the stack..well paul is cheating so bad Glass has to put his hands on pauls traps to try to keep him from rocking so much.  then paul takes off his sweatshirt and it's obvious that this guy is a freak cause he's as big as a house.  He does some hammer pulldowns and glass is encouraging him to "slow down" and "squeeze" and paul is just rocking the movements out...it's pretty pathetic.

the 98 segement is alot better, paul moves some pretty good weight on some shoulder movements and when he's flexing his bi's and legs you can't help but think he's almost unbeatable but you do notice the GH gut popping out from under his t-shirt and he sucks on a towel while he's working out...it's pretty f'n gross to see.

overall, I always liked pauls physique but c'mon....he'd be buried by most other pro's in the gym.
Title: Re: Dillett's Before BEFORE picture
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on December 22, 2006, 10:54:04 AM
if thats 'shit' then dear got i wouldnt mind stepping in it and having some rub off onto me

you're a tard! hooray!

Hahaha ok tompo.