Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MADMAX6 on September 08, 2007, 11:09:10 AM

Title: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: MADMAX6 on September 08, 2007, 11:09:10 AM
Have at it guys!

http://boards.flexonline.com/ib/ikonboard.cgi?s=a32577075d800378d20538084a1e05a8;act=ST;f=1;t=12243;st=0;r=1;&#entry234742

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-6_138.jpg)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: JCL on September 08, 2007, 11:13:23 AM
He's still a freak, but i dunno I think its over for him, although I think he's done a good job repairing his lat/tricep, it should be an interesting show.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Mars on September 08, 2007, 11:15:10 AM
hahahaha.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Dballn247 on September 08, 2007, 11:15:30 AM
He looks a little softer than some pics I saw of him a few weeks ago. I think Jay is ahead in the conditioning at this point.  Hopefully Jay won't overdiet.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: MADMAX6 on September 08, 2007, 11:16:10 AM
Jay is gonna make Coleman look small this year.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: SteelePegasus on September 08, 2007, 11:17:29 AM
He looks a little softer than some pics I saw of him a few weeks ago. I think Jay is ahead in the conditioning at this point.  Hopefully Jay won't overdiet.


he doesn't look bad here

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-1_861.jpg)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: SteelePegasus on September 08, 2007, 11:18:46 AM
jesus..can you give us a little warning first..

ok..time to hit to them..back and triceps today...


tata girls
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Dballn247 on September 08, 2007, 11:20:28 AM

he doesn't look bad here

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-1_861.jpg)

he's vascular for sure, but the pics of jay standing next to silvio were more impressive IMO. 
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Master Blaster on September 08, 2007, 11:21:41 AM
who is that pro?

Jesus, Mars you ALWAYS crack me up.

looks HUGE here, but I agree he has some continuing problems.

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-2_727.jpg)

It's insane how big Ronnie is compred to his early career.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Pete Nice on September 08, 2007, 11:29:11 AM
i still give the edge to Jay
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 08, 2007, 11:32:37 AM
ronnie is good but left arm is still messed up somewhat.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Pollux on September 08, 2007, 11:58:09 AM
Jay is gonna make Coleman look small this year.

I tend to agree with you there.

Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: busyB on September 08, 2007, 12:03:54 PM
looks HUGE here, but I agree he has some continuing problems.

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-2_727.jpg)


Yeah, like the mini high top fade..
..need to shave that and that horrible goatee before the O Ronnie!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Hulkster on September 08, 2007, 12:07:01 PM
thing is, even if Jay is bigger, if ronnie is smaller but ripped and vascular, he will be good enough to win.

Ronnie has beaten bigger competitors before by having much better quality:
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Dballn247 on September 08, 2007, 12:09:32 PM
thing is, even if Jay is bigger, if ronnie is smaller but ripped and vascular, he will be good enough to win.

Ronnie has beaten bigger competitors before by having much better quality:

Damn it's been a while, but I forgot how big Nasser was.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 12:14:01 PM
hulkster is so dilussional its entertaining ;D

ronnie noew looks like he will struggle to hang in the top 5 jeeez his left arm is looking as bad as yates in reverse!
has nothing left, should have retired last yr, but he has decided to come back and get totally spanked by cutler and probally a few others!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: tleilaxutank on September 08, 2007, 12:15:35 PM
thing is, even if Jay is bigger, if ronnie is smaller but ripped and vascular, he will be good enough to win.

Ronnie has beaten bigger competitors before by having much better quality:

Haha yeah much better quality...

MELTDOWN
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Rami on September 08, 2007, 12:22:24 PM
He is smaller, no surprise, and the vascularity is there but where did the muscle separation go? He must be on high sodium at the moment.

Wtf he looks more pale than usual, how is this possible?  ???
I guess age is finaly catching up even to Ronnie Coleman.

Will he be in top 5?
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: sgt. d on September 08, 2007, 12:23:03 PM
hulkster is so dilussional its entertaining ;D

ronnie noew looks like he will struggle to hang in the top 5 jeeez his left arm is looking as bad as yates in reverse!
has nothing left, should have retired last yr, but he has decided to come back and get totally spanked by cutler and probally a few others!

No slayer you are delusional you skinny little man
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 12:24:08 PM
if ronnie finishes top 5 it will be a gift and I can easilly see dexter and others ripping on how the hell he could place ahead of anyone looking like that!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 12:28:58 PM
Have at it guys!

http://boards.flexonline.com/ib/ikonboard.cgi?s=a32577075d800378d20538084a1e05a8;act=ST;f=1;t=12243;st=0;r=1;&#entry234742

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-6_138.jpg)

ronnies actually making a mochery of himself with that hairdo and goatee, he's basically going onstage looking like a clown with a flat tire ! ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: candidate2025 on September 08, 2007, 12:35:34 PM
last year his right shoulder over powered his left in the most muscular pose. imo its one of the reasons he lost...along with holding water and the lat symetry issue.



looks like one out of three(shoulders are even) has been taken care of...and i dont see ronnie coming in anything but shredded.

the only thing left is the lat...i know it wont be perfect(you can tell that just from the front double bi pic) but i think he could make it close. in fact i think he would be best off not even training his right lat goign into the show..just do single arms left lat contraction type movements anfd let his back even out. having a symetrical back is more important than the little bit of extra mass he would have.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: affeman on September 08, 2007, 12:42:00 PM
thing is, even if Jay is bigger, if ronnie is smaller but ripped and vascular, he will be good enough to win.

Ronnie has beaten bigger competitors before by having much better quality:

As every year Hulkster, Ronnie's 1999 condition will help him a lot this year...... ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: musclehedz on September 08, 2007, 01:00:08 PM
It's impossible for jay to lose. He just has to show up to collect his 2nd sandow.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 01:04:32 PM
JAY AFTER LOOKING AT RONNIES LATEST PICS
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 08, 2007, 01:05:22 PM
hulkster is so dilussional its entertaining ;D

ronnie noew looks like he will struggle to hang in the top 5 jeeez his left arm is looking as bad as yates in reverse!
has nothing left, should have retired last yr, but he has decided to come back and get totally spanked by cutler and probally a few others!

Great post !
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: MattT on September 08, 2007, 01:42:10 PM
OMG Ronnie's going to destroy Jay!..  Jay's muscularity does even come close to that!!  Look at Jays smooth arms, delts and chest!.  Jay has not muscularity, no vascularity, and looks smooth on his upper body.  How can someone like that be the Mr O?? Thats just not right, where's the separation in jays biceps? 


GAME OVER LIGHTS OUT JAY!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Andre Nickatina on September 08, 2007, 01:47:38 PM
You sons of bitches hating on Coleman will be sorry this year. Jay Cutler brought it to the O ONE GOD DAMN TIME.

Jay won because he had harder glutes. Jay is soft as cotton in the glutes 9 times out of 10.

And dont be ridiculouis Hulkster, Ronnie is blowing away Nasser in size there.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Meso_z on September 08, 2007, 01:54:05 PM
I hope Ronnie wins it, so he can retire and give his body a rest......
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: GR on September 08, 2007, 01:56:22 PM
if he is in the top 2,it will be a gift.He's over,everybody ages,so does he.He was awesome once but not anymore...
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Livewire on September 08, 2007, 01:57:34 PM
OMG Ronnie's going to destroy Jay!..  Jay's muscularity does even come close to that!!  Look at Jays smooth arms, delts and chest!.  Jay has not muscularity, no vascularity, and looks smooth on his upper body.  How can someone like that be the Mr O?? Thats just not right, where's the separation in jays biceps? 


GAME OVER LIGHTS OUT JAY!

mattT,

while I think it's wrong that you bang mantail, I think you're right in your assessment.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: UK Gold on September 08, 2007, 01:58:16 PM
Hulkster and his fag hags constantly harp on about Dorian's mangled arm, yet now Ronnie has the same problem they don't seem to care. Epic consistency.

1] Jay [unfortunately]
2] Martinez [undeservedly]
3] Ronnie [disgracefully]
4] Sylvio [a reward for betraying Milos]




10] Wolf [has yet to 'pay his dues']
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 08, 2007, 01:59:43 PM
Hulkster and his fag hags constantly harp on about Dorian's mangled arm, yet now Ronnie has the same problem they don't seem to care. Epic consistency.

1] Jay [unfortunately]
2] Martinez [undeservedly]
3] Ronnie [disgracefully]
4] Sylvio [a reward for betraying Milos]




10] Wolf [has yet to 'pay his dues']

Great post !!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: affy on September 08, 2007, 02:06:23 PM
Hulkster and his fag hags constantly harp on about Dorian's mangled arm, yet now Ronnie has the same problem they don't seem to care. Epic consistency.

1] Jay [unfortunately]
2] Martinez [undeservedly]
3] Ronnie [disgracefully]
4] Sylvio [a reward for betraying Milos]




10] Wolf [has yet to 'pay his dues']

sylvio is no where near top 5 olympia material

unless he's been visiting joe weider in his private batcave...i don't see that happening
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: gymguy on September 08, 2007, 02:07:22 PM
if he is in the top 2,it will be a gift.He's over,everybody ages,so does he.He was awesome once but not anymore...

Apparently, you cannot see the pictures.  Have a friend look at them for you, and he'll tell you how amazing Ronnie is looking.  I'm sure Jay's fans jaws just dropped to the floor when they saw these pics.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: GR on September 08, 2007, 02:18:10 PM
He's a monster,he's Ronnie Coleman,but he isnt Ronnie Coleman MR.OLYMPIA anymore and he shouldnt be either.He is old,deal with it,his body cant work like it used to no matter what he does.You should look at the pictures and see that he's getting worse,its all downhill from here,it's natural.Would you like a mr.olympia looking like Coleman(2007)even if he gets leaner.And he has become funny with that new look.He is not the king anymore and i am not a hater nor a jay's fan...
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: musclehedz on September 08, 2007, 02:48:31 PM
He's a monster,he's Ronnie Coleman,but he isnt Ronnie Coleman MR.OLYMPIA anymore and he shouldnt be either.He is old,deal with it,his body cant work like it used to no matter what he does.You should look at the pictures and see that he's getting worse,its all downhill from here,it's natural.Would you like a mr.olympia looking like Coleman(2007)even if he gets leaner.And he has become funny with that new look.He is not the king anymore and i am not a hater nor a jay's fan...

The truth.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: bmacsys on September 08, 2007, 02:52:30 PM
Have at it guys!

http://boards.flexonline.com/ib/ikonboard.cgi?s=a32577075d800378d20538084a1e05a8;act=ST;f=1;t=12243;st=0;r=1;&#entry234742

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-6_138.jpg)

His left arm is shot. That haircut is out of 1989.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on September 08, 2007, 03:03:32 PM
The fucken hair has got to go. Looks like a fool.

However, a lot can go down in 4 weeks . . . Ronnie's left arm and lat are very evident. I love the guy, I want him to win . . . can he?

Now, on to this load of shit madmax. Jay should he ashamed ( if he even knows ) to have this ass fighting board wars for a sitting Mr. Olympia. Beneath the title, and way beneath Jay.

The Beef
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: bmacsys on September 08, 2007, 03:04:21 PM

he doesn't look bad here

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-1_861.jpg)

Can't argue with Ronnie's results but he shows some terrible form in his t-bar rows. Looks more like an upright row the way he does them.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: GR on September 08, 2007, 03:09:12 PM
who cares about good form when you handle such weights and using so many drugs.good form is essential for natural bodybuilders and bodybuilders who use some roids but not like the pros do...
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: BroadStreetBruiser on September 08, 2007, 03:09:27 PM
(http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000001FKH.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: bmacsys on September 08, 2007, 03:15:26 PM
(http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000001FKH.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)

ahahah, I thought it was Kid n' Play! remember that tune "Word Up"?
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: SteelePegasus on September 08, 2007, 03:15:30 PM
if he is in the top 2,it will be a gift.He's over,everybody ages,so does he.He was awesome once but not anymore...

umm..he still has a few weeks to tighten up..

you are making a prediction on incomplete data
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: bmacsys on September 08, 2007, 03:17:13 PM
JAY AFTER LOOKING AT RONNIES LATEST PICS

Jay Cutler, the only man in the world who had sub 4% bodyfat and nary the sign of any vascularity.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: GR on September 08, 2007, 03:25:42 PM
SteelePegasus i have all the respect in the world for Ronnie,but even if he comes leaner,better than the pictures,i believe that he cant be mr.o.As i wrote before,his body cant deal with all the stuff he is doing anymore.Its a good time for him to stop.He has achieved everything there is in bb...
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Hulkster on September 08, 2007, 03:29:11 PM
OMG Ronnie's going to destroy Jay!..  Jay's muscularity does even come close to that!!  Look at Jays smooth arms, delts and chest!.  Jay has not muscularity, no vascularity, and looks smooth on his upper body.  How can someone like that be the Mr O?? Thats just not right, where's the separation in jays biceps? 


GAME OVER LIGHTS OUT JAY!

well, a certain other Mr. O had many of the same attibutes and was given the Mr. O 6 times..

LOL

(thats for you ND :P)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Tigerman on September 08, 2007, 03:31:30 PM
Hulkster and his fag hags constantly harp on about Dorian's mangled arm, yet now Ronnie has the same problem they don't seem to care. Epic consistency.

1] Jay [unfortunately]
2] Martinez [undeservedly]
3] Ronnie [disgracefully]
4] Sylvio [a reward for betraying Milos]


10] Wolf [has yet to 'pay his dues']

Bullshit, Ronnie's slight arm asymmetry is nowhere comparable to the totally disfigured Dorian's arm. Let's be serious, Dorian biceps was totally missing. Enough with the bullshit, Ronnie looks improved on the arm and on the lat. If his conditioning will be on spot, he will win number 9. Mark my word.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Master Blaster on September 08, 2007, 03:35:25 PM
Bullshit, Ronnie's slight arm asymmetry is nowhere comparable to the totally disfigured Dorian's arm. Let's be serious, Dorian biceps was totally missing. Enough with the bullshit, Ronnie looks improved on the arm and on the lat. If his conditioning will be on spot, he will win number 9. Mark my word.

I think Big Ron might win, but that arm looks seriously messed up. I still think it's too close to call.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 03:37:57 PM
Bullshit, Ronnie's slight arm asymmetry is nowhere comparable to the totally disfigured Dorian's arm. Let's be serious, Dorian biceps was totally missing. Enough with the bullshit, Ronnie looks improved on the arm and on the lat. If his conditioning will be on spot, he will win number 9. Mark my word.

lol ,
 commical!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 03:43:47 PM
the left arm has to be at least 3 inches smaller the the right and thats being kind!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 08, 2007, 03:50:03 PM
Bullshit, Ronnie's slight arm asymmetry is nowhere comparable to the totally disfigured Dorian's arm. Let's be serious, Dorian biceps was totally missing. Enough with the bullshit, Ronnie looks improved on the arm and on the lat. If his conditioning will be on spot, he will win number 9. Mark my word.

LMFAO totally missing , the Ronnie apologists are in full effect , here is a direct comparison of Dorian 1993 and 1994 he had ONE bicep shorter than the other and thats it....totally missing  ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: MattT on September 08, 2007, 04:04:56 PM
the left arm has to be at least 3 inches smaller the the right and thats being kind!

haha u idiot his left hand is even higher then his right hand, so thats why his biceps are not level with each other. If he brought his left arm down a few inches it would level out with is right and you would see that his biceps are basically both the same size, maybe and inch difference, but slayer have you forgot that Jays arms have about a 2 inch difference between them?, same goes for his legs, or are you just turning a blind eye to that?  Why point that out with ronnie, when your muscle god jay has un even arms to ;)

Holla!!!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 04:10:20 PM
haha u idiot his left hand is even higher then his right hand, so thats why his biceps are not level with each other. If he brought his left arm down a few inches it would level out with is right and you would see that his biceps are basically both the same size, maybe and inch difference, but slayer have you forgot that Jays arms have about a 2 inch difference between them?, same goes for his legs, or are you just turning a blind eye to that?  Why point that out with ronnie, when your muscle god jay has un even arms to ;)

Holla!!!
so so dillusion, the left bicep is slightly below the level line and the left tricep has about 6 inches needed to level with the right!


 5th place for the old pile of shit with 1 arm!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: hifrommike on September 08, 2007, 04:23:55 PM
So is Ronnie going to go bald again for the O stage?
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 08, 2007, 04:31:43 PM
kinda tired of both ronnie and jay...bodybuilding needs some new blood.

ronnie is way better than jay when it top shape..but his days are gone...or should be. i hope neither jay or ronnie make the top 3.

but this being mr olympia, jay will win..eventho i dont think he should be even close to the olympia titel.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Hulkster on September 08, 2007, 04:44:16 PM
LMFAO totally missing , the Ronnie apologists are in full effect , here is a direct comparison of Dorian 1993 and 1994 he had ONE bicep shorter than the other and thats it....totally missing  ::)

it looked horrible ND:

 ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Matt C on September 08, 2007, 04:45:12 PM
I think the only person who stands a chance at beating Ronnie is Jay.  And before you guys get too worked up over Ronnie's size, check out these pictures of Ronnie at the 2001 ASC in one of his best performances:

(http://www.getbig.com/pics/arnold/2001/men/coleman03.jpg)

(http://www.getbig.com/pics/arnold/2001/men/coleman04.jpg)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: gendreau_neil on September 08, 2007, 04:46:35 PM
The only bodypart smaller on Ronnie this year is his waist!

He's been doing 15 - 25 reps per set, partly to prevent injury, partly to enhance muscle-nerve innervation with his injured back & triceps.  Hasn't really lost much muscle size - still trains fairly heavy for the number of reps per set, taken to positive failure!  His arms and chest are swollen and his lats look to have regained their impressiveness, at least from the front.  I suspect he is not displaying any direct shots from the back to keep everyone in suspense, especially Jay.  Meanwhile, Jay does not look to have made the same quality gains, and is in less better shape this far out.

This is how I see the top ten at the '07 Olympia:

Ronnie
Victor Martinez (if dry and hard)
Tony Freeman (surprise!)
Jay
Gustavo Badell
Dexter Jackson
Markus Ruhl
Dennis Wolf (who makes the top three when he gets calves!)
Branch Warren (if absolutely crisp), or if not, then Darrem Charles

  
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Al-Gebra on September 08, 2007, 04:51:08 PM
The only bodypart smaller on Ronnie this year is his waist!

He's been doing 15 - 25 reps per set, partly to prevent injury, partly to enhance muscle-nerve innervation with his injured back & triceps.  Hasn't really lost much muscle size - still trains fairly heavy for the number of reps per set, taken to positive failure!  His arms and chest are swollen and his lats look to have regained their impressiveness, at least from the front.  I suspect he is not displaying any direct shots from the back to keep everyone in suspense, especially Jay.  Meanwhile, Jay does not look to have made the same quality gains, and is in less better shape this far out.



and how do you know all this?

IMO, he doesn't look very good . . . his tri is still visibly lagging.

Jay's champions on here might be retards like slayer, but Ronnie's not shutting them up w pics like that.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: gendreau_neil on September 08, 2007, 04:57:34 PM
As far as training methodology, just looked at a recent video clip on bodybuilding.com, dated September 4th, with interview by Bob Chicarriello.

As far as the left tricep is concerned, in all fairness, bruising is still apparent, with slightly less thickness than the right tricep, but the size differential is not nearly so pronounced as you suggest.  See post 54.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Thick Nick on September 08, 2007, 05:17:40 PM
Have at it guys!

http://boards.flexonline.com/ib/ikonboard.cgi?s=a32577075d800378d20538084a1e05a8;act=ST;f=1;t=12243;st=0;r=1;&#entry234742

(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i265/davemadmax6/sans_titre-6_138.jpg)

Did he just completely give up on doing calves? How can you be Mr. O with the ugliest calves I have ever seen...that is pathetic.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: WOOO on September 08, 2007, 05:20:13 PM
ronnie has a serious CNS injury... his right side is huge compared to his left...  :-\
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Master Blaster on September 08, 2007, 05:21:21 PM
As far as training methodology, just looked at a recent video clip on bodybuilding.com, dated September 4th, with interview by Bob Chicarriello.

As far as the left tricep is concerned, in all fairness, bruising is still apparent, with slightly less thickness than the right tricep, but the size differential is not nearly so pronounced as you suggest.  See post 54.


It's not just the size it's the appearance. It looks smooth and oily. Fair or not (not, actually) he is going to be scrutinized more than the other competitors.  :-\
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: bigguns23 on September 08, 2007, 05:53:30 PM
For everybody's information,

I just got confirmation from Ronnie's sister.  these pics are from 6 weeks ago. I don't post on here much, mainly just lurk but thought ya'll would want to know.

Glenn
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: SteelePegasus on September 08, 2007, 05:55:54 PM
I think the only person who stands a chance at beating Ronnie is Jay.  And before you guys get too worked up over Ronnie's size, check out these pictures of Ronnie at the 2001 ASC in one of his best performances:

(http://www.getbig.com/pics/arnold/2001/men/coleman03.jpg)

(http://www.getbig.com/pics/arnold/2001/men/coleman04.jpg)

my friend, those days are long gone...ronnie doesn't resemble that build any more...not even close
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 05:56:04 PM
For everybody's information,

I just got confirmation from Ronnie's sister.  these pics are from 6 weeks ago. I don't post on here much, mainly just lurk but thought ya'll would want to know.

Glenn
oh dear that changes everything ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Al-Gebra on September 08, 2007, 05:57:09 PM
For everybody's information,

I just got confirmation from Ronnie's sister.  these pics are from 6 weeks ago. I don't post on here much, mainly just lurk but thought ya'll would want to know.

Glenn


omg!!!!!!! It's GlennR from Musclemayhem . . . a.k.a Ronnie's chambermaid.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: bigguns23 on September 08, 2007, 05:58:04 PM
Hi. If anybody is going to the O, stop by the BSN booth and say hey. :)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: babyjessica on September 08, 2007, 06:12:01 PM
That picture is from 6 weeks out  ???  You should see him now.  Dave get your information correct
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Al-Gebra on September 08, 2007, 06:14:02 PM
That picture is from 6 weeks out  ???  You should see him now.  Dave get your information correct

Don't worry . . . We all know to take Dave's posts w more than a grain of salt. 

He's trying to be a Karl Rove type for Jay, but he keeps screwing up.  ;D
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: corinth on September 08, 2007, 06:14:37 PM
That picture is from 6 weeks out  ???  You should see him now.  Dave get your information correct

That wouldn't serve Dave's purpose though.

He's gotten really ridiculous with his Jay shit lately.  It's pathetic honestly, I'm surprised Jay hasn't said something to him about it.

Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 06:32:00 PM
That picture is from 6 weeks out  ???  You should see him now.  Dave get your information correct
im guessing the arm is even smaller with more conditioning, tell the old  man to sit home and watch it on bb.com!

he needs about 3 quarts of valvoline to even the mess out!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: gordiano on September 08, 2007, 06:35:38 PM
Hi. If anybody is going to the O, stop by the BSN booth and say hey. :)

Hi Glen!

What's it like hanging off of Ronnie's nuts?
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: SGT BARNES on September 08, 2007, 08:18:14 PM
Deep cuts and muscle seperation is gone. Vascularity without looks like shit.

I would say that RC is in the first stages of Palumboism, or Kovacs syndrome.

He is no longer what he was.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Luinitari on September 08, 2007, 08:29:08 PM
(http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/929691a009.jpg)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 08, 2007, 09:38:06 PM
(http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/929691a009.jpg)
nice how you snuck in the green bars covering the top and bottom of the left bi/tri ;)

this is get big, you gotta do better then that! :-*
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: pumpster on September 08, 2007, 11:40:12 PM
If Coleman were going to receive a gift along the lines of what Yates received, it would've happened last year, not this year.

He'll be lucky to get 3rd. Sliding sadly downhill, this years' loss might finally wake him up. Body's too old to respond any more.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: webcake on September 09, 2007, 12:10:23 AM
Im both a Cutler and Coleman fan, but i don't see Coleman coming in 2nd. Most likely will get 3rd. Its just down to the simple fact that he is 43. Your body is due to slow down its responsiveness to training, and other factors, sooner or later.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Arnold_Anabo on September 09, 2007, 12:37:53 AM
Hulkster and his fag hags constantly harp on about Dorian's mangled arm, yet now Ronnie has the same problem they don't seem to care. Epic consistency.

1] Jay [unfortunately]
2] Martinez [undeservedly]
3] Ronnie [disgracefully]
4] Sylvio [a reward for betraying Milos]




10] Wolf [has yet to 'pay his dues']

Wolf just won a pro contest, yeah right I guess he still has to pay his dues  ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: webcake on September 09, 2007, 12:41:54 AM
A fair placing for Wolf would be in the top 6, just due to the fact that his strong points far outweigh his weak ones, and he is bringing the type of physique that we need to see more of. But, i see him somewhere in the 8-10 range.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Andre Nickatina on September 09, 2007, 12:56:31 AM
the left arm has to be at least 3 inches smaller the the right and thats being kind!

That's just stupid to think.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: tommywishbone on September 09, 2007, 01:12:02 AM
(http://images.amazon.com/images/P/B000001FKH.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg)

 ;D
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 05:25:08 AM
it looked horrible ND:

 ::)


Almost as horrible as Ronnie's two missing calves?  ;)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 05:26:31 AM
Did he just completely give up on doing calves? How can you be Mr. O with the ugliest calves I have ever seen...that is pathetic.

Great post !
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 09, 2007, 05:37:01 AM
Great post !
this has brought up since the day getbig opened, but the ronnie fans think his calves are great ::)

ronnie should have never been mr"o" with those 2 broomsticks plain and simple, totally the most incomplete mr"o" of alltime!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 09, 2007, 05:38:02 AM
That's just stupid to think.
your probally rite , it looks more like 4 inches!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 05:46:03 AM
this has brought up since the day getbig opened, but the ronnie fans think his calves are great ::)

ronnie should have never been mr"o" with those 2 broomsticks plain and simple, totally the most incomplete mr"o" of alltime!

Well the Ronnie-apologists bitch about Dorian's bicep , yet completely gloss over Ronnie's two high and underdeveloped calves , the BIG difference is a torn bicep can really only be seen in one pose the front double bicep , weak underdeveloped calves can be in every single pose from every single angle .
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Hulkster on September 09, 2007, 06:24:29 AM
Well the Ronnie-apologists bitch about Dorian's bicep , yet completely gloss over Ronnie's two high and underdeveloped calves , the BIG difference is a torn bicep can really only be seen in one pose the front double bicep , weak underdeveloped calves can be in every single pose from every single angle .

just keep telling yourself that the arms are more important than calves and that the torn bi was only visible in ONE pose.

just keep doing it.

its fun to point how how retarded you are:

 ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 06:28:19 AM
just keep telling yourself that the arms are more important than calves and that the torn bi was only visible in ONE pose.

just keep doing it.

its fun to point how how retarded you are:

 ::)

Again you're full of shit because Yates has ARMS one bicep was shorter than the other Ronnie has NO calves , keep posting straw men the only retardedness you're point out is your own.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 06:31:37 AM
Can you spot a torn bicep? NO stop posting straw men , the torn bicep was only clearly visible in the front double biceps shot , weak calves however can be seen from every angle in every pose.


Nice try Hulkster , keep at it maybe you'll strike gold one day  ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: swilkins1984 on September 09, 2007, 06:35:03 AM
Again you're full of shit because Yates has ARMS one bicep was shorter than the other Ronnie has NO calves , keep posting straw men the only retardedness you're point out is your own.

Honestly calves are as genetic as having a wide waist. Ronnie doesn't have great calves but then again name 3 black pros that do.....pure genetics.  :-\
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 06:37:37 AM
Honestly calves are as genetic as having a wide waist. Ronnie doesn't have great calves but then again name 3 black pros that do.....pure genetics.  :-\

It doesn't matter if its genetics , three black pros with great calves , Paul Dillett , Vince Taylor and Chris Cormier , want more?
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Hulkster on September 09, 2007, 06:38:32 AM
you do realize that the torn bi was quite visible in any most muscular or its variations ND, do you not?

 ::)

you found one pic where his torn bi looks as bad as his pitiful right one. congratulations. :-\

that doesn't mean it wasn't CLEARLY noticable in most of the other shots  most of the time:

 ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: SteelePegasus on September 09, 2007, 06:39:34 AM
why don't you guys start a truce thread..it might only go a couple of pages but that is ok
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: swilkins1984 on September 09, 2007, 06:49:44 AM
It doesn't matter if its genetics , three black pros with great calves , Paul Dillett , Vince Taylor and Chris Cormier , want more?

Paul Dillet is biracial but that is beside the point  ;D Dorian even conceded on PBBW that Ronnie beats him. Ronnie out masses Dorian and with the great shape and many times equal if not beter conditioning. Contests are never won with great calves. Do you think Dorian could have added more muscle and looked somewhat balanced after 97? I don't think so.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 06:55:04 AM
Paul Dillet is biracial but that is beside the point  ;D Dorian even conceded on PBBW that Ronnie beats him. Ronnie out masses Dorian and with the great shape and many times equal if not beter conditioning. Contests are never won with great calves. Do you think Dorian could have added more muscle and looked somewhat balanced after 97? I don't think so.

No you're mistaken Dorian said the judges would probably go with Ronnie based on a size advantage , he never said " Oh yeah Ronnie's so much better than me , He'd beat me in a moment " he said it would be very hard to answer to

LMFAO Ronnie never out massed Dorian while having equal or better conditioning thats pure fantasy , the heavier Ronnie got the more his conditioning suffered for it , notice a HUGE difference in conditioning in Ronnie from 1998 to present all down hill .

Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: colie on September 09, 2007, 06:59:21 AM
hey ND....

u talk about ronnie having no calves.... but dorian won 6 sandows with no biceps (or brain...girl can't count to 10, honestly).... just look at any rear double bi shot...even in his prime....

then one fell off...or tore ...or some shit....and he still won...

it's pityful. 


btw...arnold won about 4 of his sandows with no calves.....


would u say he was undeserving?
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 07:06:18 AM
hey ND....

u talk about ronnie having no calves.... but dorian won 6 sandows with no biceps (or brain...#### can't count to 10, honestly).... just look at any rear double bi shot...even in his prime....

then one fell off...or tore ...or some shit....and he still won...

it's pityful. 


btw...arnold won about 4 of his sandows with no calves.....


would u say he was undeserving?


Blanket statements the lot of them and Arnold won 4 of his Sandows with NO calves? WTF?  ???
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slayer on September 09, 2007, 07:24:10 AM
hey ND....

u talk about ronnie having no calves.... but dorian won 6 sandows with no biceps (or brain...#### can't count to 10, honestly).... just look at any rear double bi shot...even in his prime....

then one fell off...or tore ...or some shit....and he still won...

it's pityful. 


btw...arnold won about 4 of his sandows with no calves.....


would u say he was undeserving?

arnold has awsome calves , check your eyes!
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Big Worm on September 09, 2007, 07:58:56 AM
Jay is gonna make Coleman look small this year.
Get off Jays c0ck already.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Big Worm on September 09, 2007, 08:08:30 AM
Hi Glen!

What's it like hanging off of Ronnie's nuts?
I'm sure no different than Madmax and slayers dangle from Jays?
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: pumpster on September 09, 2007, 08:37:05 AM
Can you spot a torn bicep? NO stop posting straw men , the torn bicep was only clearly visible in the front double biceps shot , weak calves however can be seen from every angle in every pose.


The funniest thing is that *both* bis are missing, they were flapjacks. And he's worried about the torn one. ;D

Mediocre bis will always be more significant than calves.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: pumpster on September 09, 2007, 08:40:16 AM
hey ND....

u talk about ronnie having no calves.... but dorian won 6 sandows with no biceps (or brain...#### can't count to 10, honestly).... just look at any rear double bi shot...even in his prime....

then one fell off...or tore ...or some shit....and he still won...

it's pityful. 


btw...arnold won about 4 of his sandows with no calves.....


would u say he was undeserving?


LOL just wait ND never runs out of manufactured excuses that are easy to see thru.

He's attracted to "nice looking white BBs"  as he's said himself :-* however well-behaved negros are also considered.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Hulkster on September 09, 2007, 08:40:16 AM
LOL ND being owned again like the delusional fool that he is.

still living in 1992..lol

Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Livewire on September 09, 2007, 09:04:19 AM
At their best - Ronnie beats Jay.  period.

I give you, 2001!

http://www.getanabolics.com/2007/07/jay-cutler-vs-ronnie-coleman.html
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 09, 2007, 10:26:51 AM
  Ronnie looks incredible for a guy who's 44, but the bottom line is that his muscle quality is down due to his age, and it won't come back. As you age, your muscle density and maturity increase, but your actual muscle size goes down.

  Bodybuilding is unique among sports in that athletes reach their peaks very late. Gymnasts reach their peak in their adolescence and then start slipping down. Swimmers reach it in their early twenties and then slip down. Sprinters reach it in their mid to late twenties and then go down(ages 25-29). Marathon runners reach it in their late twenties to early thirties and then go down. Bodybuilders, conversely, only reach their peaks in their late thirties to age 40.

  Ronnie reached his peak of muscle size and density at the 2003 Olympia, when he was age 39 going on 40. The problem is that, at age 44, Ronnie is too old even by bodybuilding standards. This is how I see his Olympia performances:

 1998 - His best package. He played to his strenghs that year, namely, his taper and muscle separations, striations and vascularity and it worked.

 1999 - A repeat from 1998, except that he was slightly bigger but with worse abdominal separations and a slight gut distension.

 2000 - I think that he looked better than most people give him credit for: he was huge with good conditioning, although the gut got worse.

 2001 - Should have lost to Cutler. Jay defeated Ronnie at this contest far more than he did in 2006.

 2002 - He was small, flat and holding water. His worst Olympia performance. If Cutler had entered this show in the form he was at the 2001 Olympia, he would have won.

 2003 - Lots of people love this form of Ronnie, but I don't. He was humongous in terms of muscles, but holding even more water than in 2002, and he took gut distension to levels that were unheard of before.

 2004 - Like 2003, except holding even more water and with an even worse gut.

 2005 - His best performance in years. Much better than 2000/1/2/3/4. At 275 lbs, he had lots of the mass he had the previous year, only with much better conditioning and a much tighter midsection. Also, at age 41, his muscle density set him apart from his competitors.

 2006 - I think he should have won. He was holding water during pre-judging and he lost thickness and width in his lats, but his overral muscularity was superior to Jay's, especially from the front. To be honest, I think that Coleman should hve won exclusively due to his MM

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 01:02:10 PM
The funniest thing is that *both* bis are missing, they were flapjacks. And he's worried about the torn one. ;D

Mediocre bis will always be more significant than calves.

I love your logic  ::) mediocre bicep will always be more significant than calves , just like the CFL is better than the NFL  ::) your logic leaves a lot to be desired , Dorian's biceps weren't great granted , they were good , Ronnie's calves are pathetic BIG difference they're high , they lack diamond shape , they lack developement & separation not to mention proportion , and I hate to break it to you pumpy weak calves are a liability especially compared to someone who has them , Ronnie may have gotten away with pathetic calves compared to the realatively weak competition he faced m but they are part & parcel of a great balance physique ask Arnold Schwarzenegger

good thing we don't based contests using your logic  ;)

Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 01:05:04 PM
LOL just wait ND never runs out of manufactured excuses that are easy to see thru.

He's attracted to "nice looking white BBs"  as he's said himself :-* however well-behaved negros are also considered.

This is what you're working with? I never said that nonsense and I know you've been taking a beating as of late hence the hostility but please refrain from lying .


you're always commenting on homosexuality what would Freud say?  ;)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: colie on September 09, 2007, 04:25:14 PM
I love your logic  ::) mediocre bicep will always be more significant than calves , just like the CFL is better than the NFL  ::) your logic leaves a lot to be desired , Dorian's biceps weren't great granted , they were good , Ronnie's calves are pathetic BIG difference they're high , they lack diamond shape , they lack developement & separation not to mention proportion , and I hate to break it to you pumpy weak calves are a liability especially compared to someone who has them , Ronnie may have gotten away with pathetic calves compared to the realatively weak competition he faced m but they are part & parcel of a great balance physique ask Arnold Schwarzenegger

good thing we don't based contests using your logic  ;)



u truly are a fool......

dorian is the first and only olympian to have no biceps worth talking about....when a fan greets a famous bbr (like i did once in carrickfergus...ireland) what does that fan ask of his idol?   ''show me your biceps''

dozzer had only got one bicep that year....and decided to say NO to his fans....

he is a cock sock with no literacy skills.... he is a girl
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 09, 2007, 05:21:53 PM
u truly are a fool......

dorian is the first and only olympian to have no biceps worth talking about....when a fan greets a famous bbr (like i did once in carrickfergus...ireland) what does that fan ask of his idol?   ''show me your biceps''

dozzer had only got one bicep that year....and decided to say NO to his fans....

he is a cock sock with no literacy skills.... he is a ####

Sounds like you have an axe to grind lol
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: Danimal77 on September 09, 2007, 10:21:14 PM
u truly are a fool......

dorian is the first and only olympian to have no biceps worth talking about....when a fan greets a famous bbr (like i did once in carrickfergus...ireland) what does that fan ask of his idol?   ''show me your biceps''

dozzer had only got one bicep that year....and decided to say NO to his fans....

he is a cock sock with no literacy skills.... he is a ####

Wrong. Chris Dickerson - 1982 Mr. Olympia winner had no biceps to speak of either. In fact, they were much worse than pre-Dorian tear.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: pumpster on September 09, 2007, 10:29:53 PM
u truly are a fool......

dorian is the first and only olympian to have no biceps worth talking about....when a fan greets a famous bbr (like i did once in carrickfergus...ireland) what does that fan ask of his idol?   ''show me your biceps''

dozzer had only got one bicep that year....and decided to say NO to his fans....

he is a cock sock with no literacy skills.... he is a ####

bwahahahaahahah common sense like this is too hard for ND.

Who's the bigger cock sock, ND or Yates. :D
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: pumpster on September 09, 2007, 10:32:44 PM
Wrong. Chris Dickerson - 1982 Mr. Olympia winner had no biceps to speak of either. In fact, they were much worse than pre-Dorian tear.

Comparing Yates to Dickerson's basically admitting Yates was tier-B.
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: phyxsius on September 09, 2007, 10:33:10 PM
This is how I see the top ten at the '07 Olympia:

Ronnie
Victor Martinez (if dry and hard)
Tony Freeman (surprise!)
Jay
Gustavo Badell
Dexter Jackson
Markus Ruhl
Dennis Wolf (who makes the top three when he gets calves!)
Branch Warren (if absolutely crisp), or if not, then Darrem Charles

 

It's a good thing that you're not the judge but a douch
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: webcake on September 09, 2007, 10:35:08 PM
Isn't there already a small thread about this Yates fella  ::)
Title: Re: New Coleman pics Sept 6th, 2007.
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 10, 2007, 04:35:24 AM
LOL ND being owned again like the delusional fool that he is.

still living in 1992..lol



if you owned ND as many times you claim,why are you still arguing with the guy? and yes ronnie in top shape> yates

all you guys are in a symbiotic relationship  :D

keep your stuff in the marathon thread. hahaha you guys must be the most pathetic getbiggers of all..specially hulkster and ND as you have not posted on any other topics than dorian vs coleman it the last couple of years. ohhhhh brother!  ::)