Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Special Ed on September 09, 2007, 07:12:12 PM

Title: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Special Ed on September 09, 2007, 07:12:12 PM
Is it just me, or does there seem to be a misinformation campaign being waged against the 8-time Mr. Olympia?

First, some anonymous person states without any documentation, that Ronnie tore his tricep.  A few photoshopped and ill-angled photographs are posted purporting to support this "theory" when in reality, it's completely untrue.  The result, however, is that people now "see" something that isn't there, and the judges can justify marking Coleman down because of his lack of "symmetry".  Ignore if you will, that these are, for the most part, the same judges who never marked Yates down for his own lack of symmetry when Dorian's bicep disappeared for a few Mr. Olympias, despite Dorian's imbalance being both obvious and embarrassing.

Rather than ignore the accusations and misinformation about Ronnie's "secret injury", the magazines irresponsibly jump on board, even going so far as to have their own "pseudo-experts" analyze photos and support the smear-Ronnie campaign.

Even worse, the magazines choose to publish the absolute worst photos of Coleman from the 2006 Olympia. Whereas in the past, Coleman photos would always be dead-on straight and clear, suddenly the photographers lost their way, and the best photos of Coleman they can get are taken from angles or when he is not 100% into his poses.

Somehow, more gasoline gets thrown on the fire when a second rumor takes off that Ronnie has a torn lat. Again, ignoring the fact that no evidence exists to support the claim, before you know it, people are jumping on this one as well, and eventually it finds its way into print, which like a Muscletech advertorial, is as good as the gospel to most fans.

The end result: Ronnie's chances of winning have been damaged. Judges can justify marking him down. The fans think he lost because he's injured. Ronnie is forced to retire because of "phantom injuries".

Your thoughts?
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on September 09, 2007, 07:14:11 PM
The Beef thinks your a douche bag . . . 14 min, 45 seconds.

The Beef
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: D.L. 5 on September 09, 2007, 07:17:10 PM
you are correct Ed...I bet Jay Cutler orchestrated this shit.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Livewire on September 09, 2007, 07:20:09 PM
muscletech sponsors the olympia.

cutler is muscletech's boy.

cutler is white and sells more mags and supplements than ronnie.

this is business.   sport/competition don't matter
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Bast000 on September 09, 2007, 07:20:39 PM
i am repulsed at how much thought you put into this.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: pumpster on September 09, 2007, 07:20:40 PM
posted purporting to support this "theory" when in reality, it's completely untrue.  The result, however, is that people now "see" something that isn't there, and the judges can justify marking Coleman down because of his lack of "symmetry".  Ignore if you will, that these are, for the most part, the same judges who never marked Yates down for his own lack of symmetry when Dorian's bicep disappeared for a few Mr. Olympias, despite Dorian's imbalance being both obvious and embarrassing.

Ya there's an interesting double standard when it comes to uncle joe's gift-giving.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Hulkster on September 09, 2007, 07:22:12 PM
Quote
Ignore if you will, that these are, for the most part, the same judges who never marked Yates down for his own lack of symmetry when Dorian's bicep disappeared for a few Mr. Olympias, despite Dorian's imbalance being both obvious and embarrassing.


ND is quick to point out that the same judges apparently thought that dorian's injury was 'slight' and had 'no bearing' on him at all..

 ::)

and ND worships these same retarded judges.. ::)
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: pumpster on September 09, 2007, 07:23:06 PM
muscletech sponsors the olympia.

cutler is muscletech's boy.

cutler is white and sells more mags and supplements than ronnie.

this is business.   sport/competition don't matter

Interesting just how little this is acknowledged on getbig. Yates, Columbu, Zane..
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: McFarland on September 09, 2007, 07:24:44 PM
Ronnie's no-show for that one pre-Olympia PBW was the beginning of the end, if you ask me.  
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: corinth on September 09, 2007, 07:26:35 PM
It does seem like the entire industry is pulling for Jay to win.

Add in the Muscletech Olympia sponsorship and the judges willingness to totally disregard Jay's complete lack of symmetry and it doesn't look good for Big Ron.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: cswol on September 09, 2007, 07:28:05 PM
it's no secret the ifbb has hand selected jay cutler as mr. olympia................m admax has already confirmed the win has already gone to jay, madmax is going to come on the board after the show and gloat on the board saying he told you guys so...............straigh t from his fingers.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Bast000 on September 09, 2007, 07:28:15 PM
joe weider doesn't care about black people.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: 240 is Back on September 09, 2007, 07:28:34 PM
we'll quickly know the value of Ed's theory based upon the responses.

If they attack him - the messenger and not the message - then we'll know he's onto something.  If they call it asinine yet cannot come up with any evidence to the contrary or even a simple rebuattal, well then, who knows.  

Financially, IMO, it's a wash.  Short-term, Jay is better for the bottom line as champ.  Long-term, a 2008 showdown with 2006 winner Jay and 2007 winner Ronnie would be cool - but Ronnie is retiring.  My money has to be on Jay in this case to win.  It feels like no one is going out of their way to give Ronnie a chance - despite the fact that he is 8-1 in the last nine Olympias, as monumental as that is.

Jay is on the honeymoon because he won as the underdog.  If he wins in 2007, he'll be a Dynasty and suddenly there will be a lot more disdain for him shown by the artistic fans.  Whatever happens, 2007 will be a good show, and yes Ed, with the amount of dollars being spent on Jay, there certainly exists MOTIVATION to paint Jay in a favorable light and Ronnie in an unfavorable light.  Whether or not some parties have acted on it, time will tell, I suppose.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: McFarland on September 09, 2007, 07:34:30 PM
You've gotta be willing to "play the game," and I think that after a while Ronnie lost the willingness to do that and that's when they decided to pull the plug.  It may not have even been such a conscious, coordinated effort, as Ed's suggesting here, but in hindsight, you can definitely see where he lost most all the wind from his sails (save his own) in a very brief period of time.  What Ed's put together here points to a definite trend, but you can't be so quick to call it a conspiracy because alot of the factors that go into something like this happening can unfold in much more subtle ways.  

These things DO happen, though.  

As far as I can tell, Ronnie hasn't done much since his loss to rekindle the symbiotic flame he once had with everyone at the top of the ladder, and Jay's been more than willing to work with all the right people to create more revenue for the industry, even trying to help create new outlets for financial gain with those willing to partner with him.  He's the consummate professional and the industry must love him.  Name another pro that they could have in place that would work harder for them, and himself in that capacity.  Jay's strictly business and always has been, from the very beginning.  Solid.    

And something Alex23 made reference to the other day...how it's never good to polarize yourself, taking sides, or making enemies...name one person Jay has ever had a beef with.  You can't do it, and as far as I know that's truly unique in an industry as filled with drama as this one.   
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 09, 2007, 07:37:12 PM
joe weider doesn't care about black people.

  Joe Weider loves Black people: the two greatest Mr.Olympias ever were Black. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Al-Gebra on September 09, 2007, 07:46:42 PM
Don't forget Jay's business partner MADMAX posting pics from over a month ago (nine weeks out) as three weeks out pics with the caption, "Have at it, boys."  I'm sure he didn't intend to create the impression that Ronnie was slacking or something like that.  ::) If the dumbass hadn't overplayed his hand, he actually might have been more persuasive. 

Bottom line is that Jay seems to be a more canny competitor and that was enough to give him the edge last year.  Ronnie definitely had more issues than "bad camera angles" and "unhit poses," but Jay was not good enough to pass him on-stage.  However, it seems that the powers-that-be decided it was time for a change.

Ronnie's biggest flaw is that he seems a little too naive about what it takes to win . . . however, with his genetic gifts, it might be possible for him to pull another rabbit out of the hat yet. 
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Special Ed on September 09, 2007, 07:48:03 PM
You've gotta be willing to "play the game," and I think that after a while Ronnie lost the willingness to do that and that's when they decided to pull the plug.  It may not have even been such a conscious, coordinated effort, as Ed's suggesting here, but in hindsight, you can definitely see where he lost most all the wind from his sails save his own in a very brief period of time.  What Ed's put together here points to a definite trend, but you can't be so quick to call it a conspiracy because alot of the factors that go into something like this happening can unfold in much more subtle ways.   

These things DO happen, though. 

As far as I can tell, Ronnie hasn't done much since his loss to rekindle the symbiotic flame he once had with everyone at the top of the ladder, and Jay's been more than willing to work with all the right people to create more revenue for the industry, even trying to help create new outlets for financial gain with those willing to partner with him.  He's the consummate professional and the industry must love him.  Name another pro that they could have in place that would work harder for them, and himself in that capacity.  Jay's strictly business and always has been, from the very beginning.  Solid.     
Intelligent response.

Let me add one more thing that is rarely discussed: The Guest Posing Scam

Most professional bodybuilders guest pose under one of two scenarios:
1)They are contracted with by a promoter to guest pose for a fee; or
2)They are contractually required to guest pose as part of their supplement contract (in which they are not paid outside of their contract).

Then there is the DIRTY SECRET of the Mr. Olympia title, called MANDATORY GUEST POSTING FOR FREE.  Here's how it works:

The Mr. Olympia winner is asked by several prominent IFBB figureheads (promoters, judges, etc.) to guest-pose at their own promoted-shows. The catch is that they are asked to do these guest posings without financial compensation. Sure, they get their airfare, and hotel paid for, but a Mr. Olympia typically commands $4,000-$6,000 per guest posing, and in this case, there is no money changing hands.

So what is Mr. Olympia to do? Do a "favor" for the same people who will be judging him at next year's Olympia or tell them to pay up and take your chances?

So you have Ronnie Coleman foregoing about $40,000 a year in guest posing fees (one could say 'investing') to ensure the judges are all happy with him and think he's a great guy.

But then Mr. Olympia runner-up Jay Cutler begins doing the same favor for the same judges. The judges/promoters are making out bigtime -- they can have Jay Cutler and Ronnie Coleman guest-pose at their show for free!!

So what happens when Ronnie Coleman has had enough and suddenly says, "Fuck this shit, I ain't posing for free no more!"

Perhaps what happens is the 2006 Mr. Olympia result: Ronnie loses.

Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Cap on September 09, 2007, 07:53:55 PM
  Joe Weider loves Black people: the two greatest Mr.Olympias ever were Black. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Arnie is better than Haney and comparing him to Coleman is not even worth it; apples and oranges.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: mitchyboy on September 09, 2007, 07:54:36 PM
This is why bodybuilding will never be a real sport. Go suck a few and you can win to. Just plain stupid
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: McFarland on September 09, 2007, 07:56:00 PM
Intelligent response.

Let me add one more thing that is rarely discussed: The Guest Posing Scam

Most professional bodybuilders guest pose under one of two scenarios:
1)They are contracted with by a promoter to guest pose for a fee; or
2)They are contractually required to guest pose as part of their supplement contract (in which they are not paid outside of their contract).

Then there is the DIRTY SECRET of the Mr. Olympia title, called MANDATORY GUEST POSTING FOR FREE.  Here's how it works:

The Mr. Olympia winner is asked by several prominent IFBB figureheads (promoters, judges, etc.) to guest-pose at their own promoted-shows. The catch is that they are asked to do these guest posings without financial compensation. Sure, they get their airfare, and hotel paid for, but a Mr. Olympia typically commands $4,000-$6,000 per guest posing, and in this case, there is no money changing hands.

So what is Mr. Olympia to do? Do a "favor" for the same people who will be judging him at next year's Olympia or tell them to pay up and take your chances?

So you have Ronnie Coleman foregoing about $40,000 a year in guest posing fees (one could say 'investing') to ensure the judges are all happy with him and think he's a great guy.

But then Mr. Olympia runner-up Jay Cutler begins doing the same favor for the same judges. The judges/promoters are making out bigtime -- they can have Jay Cutler and Ronnie Coleman guest-pose at their show for free!!

So what happens when Ronnie Coleman has had enough and suddenly says, "Fuck this shit, I ain't posing for free no more!"

Perhaps what happens is the 2006 Mr. Olympia result: Ronnie loses.



Yeah and it's easy to imagine him having problems after a while if he ever let himself feel like he was being made to "sing and dance for the man."  I believe that to have been the root cause of Dave Chapelle's meltdown causing him to basically hand back that 50 million he was getting from Comedy Central.    
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: McFarland on September 09, 2007, 08:09:51 PM
And listen, people can cry foul all they want to about Dave's anti-Ronnie campaign but two things here:

1)  If Ronnie blows Jay away on the stage what is negatively suspected of Coleman's physique going into the show instantly will not mean shit, and

2)  It's the same thing Chad Nicholls would do every year leading up to the Olympia when he would make his annual "what's wrong with Ronnie's competition" proclamation post sighting something about how Jay's right leg was bigger than his left or something just as ridiculous.  I mean how much does that bullshit really matter in the end, I never really understood it or why people felt like it was so significant to bitch about.  Much ado about nothing if you ask me.  I guess potentially the most appreciable effect would be the person being talked about's letting it get to him, not so much how it made everyone else perceive them, because like I said, all he's gotta do is show up looking convincingly better than Jay and he will instantly win regardless of pre-show hype.  And I'm not just talking about shades of stuff we've seen before, I mean, we will KNOW that Ronnie's gonna win if he's indeed to do so this time, I mean he's up against alot here.  Jay's just got his own ball rolling so hard at this point.     

Let Dave say or do whatever he wants; all's fair in love and war.  Just show me the pics taken on the day of the Olympia.  Had Ronnie been ON like he was the year he first one there's no way in hell Jay would have ever beaten him, conspiracy or not.     
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Al-Gebra on September 09, 2007, 08:16:15 PM
And listen, people can cry foul all they want to about Dave's anti-Ronnie campaign but two things here:

1)  If Ronnie blows Jay away on the stage what is negatively suspected of Coleman's physique going into the show instantly will not mean shit, and

2)  It's the same thing Chad Nicholls would do every year leading up to the Olympia when he would make his annual "what's wrong with Ronnie's competition" proclamation post sighting something about how Jay's right leg was bigger than his left or something just as ridiculous.  I mean how much does that bullshit really matter in the end, I never really understood it or why people felt like it was so significant to bitch about.  Much ado about nothing if you ask me.  I guess potentially the most appreciable effect would be the person being talked about's letting it get to him, not so much how it made everyone else perceive them, because like I said, all he's gotta do is show up looking convincingly better than Jay and he will instantly win regardless of pre-show hype.  And I'm not just talking about shades of stuff we've seen before, I mean, we will KNOW that Ronnie's gonna win if he's indeed to do so this time, I mean he's up against alot here.  Jay's just got his own ball rolling so hard at this point.     

Let Dave say or do whatever he wants; all's fair in love and war.  Just show me the pics taken on the day of the Olympia.  Had Ronnie been ON like he was the year he first one there's no way in hell Jay would have ever beaten him, conspiracy or not.     

that's all well and good, but there is also some truth to the eye seeing what the mind believes. if people are expecting to see an out of shape ronnie, they'll look for things to support their belief. 

there is a difference b/w what dave and chad did . . . chad was more or less speaking the truth, whereas dave decided to create his own truth.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: McFarland on September 09, 2007, 08:23:13 PM
that's all well and good, but their is also some truth to the eye seeing what the mind believes. if people are expecting to see an out of shape ronnie, they'll look for things to support their belief. 

there is a difference b/w what dave and chad did . . . chad was more or less speaking the truth, whereas dave decided to create his own truth.


Oh come on now.   ;D
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Al-Gebra on September 09, 2007, 08:27:58 PM
 ;D

Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: GR on September 09, 2007, 08:35:20 PM
If Ronnie comes in shape,he will win.He is better than Jay,we all know that.But he has won 8 times and he is old.His body cant work the same as in the past,no matter what he does.I respect him but he must retire...
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: McFarland on September 09, 2007, 08:40:31 PM
All real good points, Ed. 

Yeah the outcome of this show's surely gonna be interesting.  I'm really looking forward to it.   
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: GroinkTropin on September 09, 2007, 08:52:23 PM
In my mind ronnie tried to hang on just one show too long. The judges just couldn't ignore cutler forever, he deserved several sandows, presented himself like a champ and just killed himself day in and day out. Judges are human, these things bear weight you know. I think shawn ray would also have won at least once, but if he had something to say he said fuck the haters and said what he had to. Also let's not forget judges ALWAYS judge on past showings, you HAVE to improve or they mark you down, no matter who you are. ROnnie has slipped a bit, and jay has been improving it is what it is. By the looks of things I have actually noticed a lot of pics of ronnie from the 06 olympia as well as various guest posings DEFINITELY center around his bad angles. This was not always so. At least we are intelligent enough to realize what's going on, though there is nothing we can do to stop it....
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 09, 2007, 08:57:50 PM
Arnie is better than Haney and comparing him to Coleman is not even worth it; apples and oranges.

  I'm talking about number of Mr.Olympia titles, not about who's better.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: slayer on September 09, 2007, 09:04:41 PM
Is it just me, or does there seem to be a misinformation campaign being waged against the 8-time Mr. Olympia?

First, some anonymous person states without any documentation, that Ronnie tore his tricep.  A few photoshopped and ill-angled photographs are posted purporting to support this "theory" when in reality, it's completely untrue.  The result, however, is that people now "see" something that isn't there, and the judges can justify marking Coleman down because of his lack of "symmetry".  Ignore if you will, that these are, for the most part, the same judges who never marked Yates down for his own lack of symmetry when Dorian's bicep disappeared for a few Mr. Olympias, despite Dorian's imbalance being both obvious and embarrassing.

Rather than ignore the accusations and misinformation about Ronnie's "secret injury", the magazines irresponsibly jump on board, even going so far as to have their own "pseudo-experts" analyze photos and support the smear-Ronnie campaign.

Even worse, the magazines choose to publish the absolute worst photos of Coleman from the 2006 Olympia. Whereas in the past, Coleman photos would always be dead-on straight and clear, suddenly the photographers lost their way, and the best photos of Coleman they can get are taken from angles or when he is not 100% into his poses.

Somehow, more gasoline gets thrown on the fire when a second rumor takes off that Ronnie has a torn lat. Again, ignoring the fact that no evidence exists to support the claim, before you know it, people are jumping on this one as well, and eventually it finds its way into print, which like a Muscletech advertorial, is as good as the gospel to most fans.

The end result: Ronnie's chances of winning have been damaged. Judges can justify marking him down. The fans think he lost because he's injured. Ronnie is forced to retire because of "phantom injuries".

Your thoughts?
maybe he just looks like shit now and doesnt photograph well anymore , get over it douchebag!
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: RagingBull on September 09, 2007, 09:18:23 PM
Ya there's an interesting double standard when it comes to uncle joe's gift-giving.

One of the widest stomachs in the history of the sport displayed by Yates.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Rearden Metal on September 09, 2007, 09:46:11 PM
Or....

It could be that Ronnie really does have a torn lat, tri, quad and a 42" gut. Don't get me wrong, he's still the freakiest baddest bodybuilder out there, but he looks like a shadow of his former self.

All the conspiracies aside, Jay looked better last year.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Cap on September 09, 2007, 10:00:58 PM
One of the widest stomachs in the history of the sport displayed by Yates.
And now with Ronnie but Dorian never tore a lat. 

Doz tears: visible bicep, tricep before 1997 O
Ron tears: visible tricep, visible lat

I'm talking about number of Mr.Olympia titles, not about who's better.
True.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: gordiano on September 09, 2007, 10:12:22 PM
Let's not forget, that Ronnie has the "Ronnieconda", which many here (Scott Markey & the like) may be jealous of......
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: grab an umbrella on September 09, 2007, 10:12:40 PM
Sped, just because dorian had a fucked up body and the judges let it slide, doesn't make it okay.  If you want bodybuilding to progress as a sport, then stop saying shit like this.  Ronnie clearly did something to his left lat/and tricep.  Thats very apparent.  The extent of the damage on the other hand is not.  Ronnie has very clear symetry issues from the back now.  IMO, his back is what was keeping him on top of everyone else.  When Jay's back finally started catching up, I believe the judges decided it was time for someone else. 
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: dorkeroo on September 09, 2007, 10:17:05 PM
Or....

It could be that Ronnie really does have a torn lat, tri, quad and a 42" gut. Don't get me wrong, he's still the freakiest baddest bodybuilder out there, but he looks like a shadow of his former self.

All the conspiracies aside, Jay looked better last year.

I agree with everything here. I pretend there isn't something wrong with Ronnie's arm (tricep) and lat is IMO lying to oneself. There have been too many pics to believe otherwise.

On the other hand, 99% of the posters here have not seen Ronnie in person and photos can sometimes lie when compared to what is seen in real life.

However, there have been numerous photos from too many different angles that appear to show definite injuries. I don't think it is fair to blame anyone for thinking he is hurt or that there is a conspiracy (I mean it wouldn't be the first time a bodybuilder has lied about something), it really looks like something happened to him according the the photos taken this past year resulting in misshapen or atrophied muscles (tricep and lat).

Now whether or not he will be penalized according to them remains to be seen this year.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Hedgehog on September 10, 2007, 02:01:24 AM


Then there is the DIRTY SECRET of the Mr. Olympia title, called MANDATORY GUEST POSTING FOR FREE.  Here's how it works:

The Mr. Olympia winner is asked by several prominent IFBB figureheads (promoters, judges, etc.) to guest-pose at their own promoted-shows. The catch is that they are asked to do these guest posings without financial compensation. Sure, they get their airfare, and hotel paid for, but a Mr. Olympia typically commands $4,000-$6,000 per guest posing, and in this case, there is no money changing hands.

So what is Mr. Olympia to do? Do a "favor" for the same people who will be judging him at next year's Olympia or tell them to pay up and take your chances?

So you have Ronnie Coleman foregoing about $40,000 a year in guest posing fees (one could say 'investing') to ensure the judges are all happy with him and think he's a great guy.

But then Mr. Olympia runner-up Jay Cutler begins doing the same favor for the same judges. The judges/promoters are making out bigtime -- they can have Jay Cutler and Ronnie Coleman guest-pose at their show for free!!

So what happens when Ronnie Coleman has had enough and suddenly says, "Fuck this shit, I ain't posing for free no more!"

Perhaps what happens is the 2006 Mr. Olympia result: Ronnie loses.



The obvious question for MADMAX is how many guest posings Jay Cutler has done for free this year.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: pillowtalk on September 10, 2007, 03:31:34 AM
muscletech sponsors the olympia.

cutler is muscletech's boy.

cutler is white and sells more mags and supplements than ronnie.

this is business.   sport/competition don't matter

This is business, oh, and politics in BB'ing ??, nah !!, ya think ??, what for real 'n' shit, naaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah..... ..........

PT -- SAIDA.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on September 10, 2007, 04:28:04 AM
Conspiracy is bullshit, Ronnie was off for one show and Cutler was at his best.

It was close but it was a pretty fair call. But that was Ronnie at his worst and Cutler at his best...............

Actually after Chad Nicholls said it was very close between Ronnie and Jay you know Jay looked better he is biased as fuck towards his athletes.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 10, 2007, 04:58:47 AM
Is it just me, or does there seem to be a misinformation campaign being waged against the 8-time Mr. Olympia?

First, some anonymous person states without any documentation, that Ronnie tore his tricep.  A few photoshopped and ill-angled photographs are posted purporting to support this "theory" when in reality, it's completely untrue.  The result, however, is that people now "see" something that isn't there, and the judges can justify marking Coleman down because of his lack of "symmetry".  Ignore if you will, that these are, for the most part, the same judges who never marked Yates down for his own lack of symmetry when Dorian's bicep disappeared for a few Mr. Olympias, despite Dorian's imbalance being both obvious and embarrassing.

Rather than ignore the accusations and misinformation about Ronnie's "secret injury", the magazines irresponsibly jump on board, even going so far as to have their own "pseudo-experts" analyze photos and support the smear-Ronnie campaign.

Even worse, the magazines choose to publish the absolute worst photos of Coleman from the 2006 Olympia. Whereas in the past, Coleman photos would always be dead-on straight and clear, suddenly the photographers lost their way, and the best photos of Coleman they can get are taken from angles or when he is not 100% into his poses.

Somehow, more gasoline gets thrown on the fire when a second rumor takes off that Ronnie has a torn lat. Again, ignoring the fact that no evidence exists to support the claim, before you know it, people are jumping on this one as well, and eventually it finds its way into print, which like a Muscletech advertorial, is as good as the gospel to most fans.

The end result: Ronnie's chances of winning have been damaged. Judges can justify marking him down. The fans think he lost because he's injured. Ronnie is forced to retire because of "phantom injuries".

Your thoughts?

this is not anything new, snowball effect combined with the fact ronnie has slipped and his arm is in fact fucked up (compared to what he used to be..altho he should be compared to the other competitors instead.) alot of people are tired of ronnie...its simple business..people want something new something fresh....but sadly all they got is no personality cutler who claimed he would be able to sell bodybuilding better than ronnie did...haha what bullshit, neither of em has the personality to do it. for me neither cutler or ronnie have the best physiques....



cutler sucks.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 10, 2007, 05:12:19 AM
Interesting just how little this is acknowledged on getbig. Yates, Columbu, Zane..

no i said this many times, and i seen others say the same thing. inconsistent judging due to politics but also due to  pure human subjecivity (which can always be effected by different kinds of prejudice)

the best bodybuilder in the 90s where the guys who won the arnold classic. (with a few exceptions).

bodybuilding competitions are boring due to many factors...the extreme subjectivity, the nature of the competition, politics, + the physiques look better a few weeks out + other reasons.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Rampage on September 10, 2007, 05:32:52 AM
i wanna say this :

Ronnie juuust lost to jay last year because of conditioning right  ?

So now with a year to prepare and  and knowing he`ll get his conditioning right this time tell me again why he is the underdog  ??
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 10, 2007, 05:36:51 AM
i wanna say this :

Ronnie juuust lost to jay last year because of conditioning right  ?

So now with a year to prepare and  and knowing he`ll get his conditioning right this time tell me again why he is the underdog  ??

he has slipped in more ways that that...he is smaller than he used to be.....lats, arms.. are smaller...he just lost alot of that edge.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Monster81 on September 10, 2007, 05:44:14 AM
he has slipped in more ways that that...he is smaller than he used to be.....lats, arms.. are smaller...he just lost alot of that edge.
Ronnie did not get smaller, its only Jay who got bigger and wider
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 10, 2007, 05:55:58 AM
Ronnie did not get smaller, its only Jay who got bigger and wider

jay has improved his back no doubt.but ronnie he has lost mass in his back and in his arms (atleast the injured one)

and generally his physique is not as "crisp" as it used to be.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Monster81 on September 10, 2007, 06:05:59 AM
jay has improved his back no doubt.but ronnie he has lost mass in his back and in his arms (atleast the injured one)

and generally his physique is not as "crisp" as it used to be.
i agree with u , injuries very clear, and he also realised the mistakes he made last year showing up the way he did . who knows how he will show this time???
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: slaveboy1980 on September 10, 2007, 06:09:03 AM
i agree with u , injuries very clear, and he also realised the mistakes he made last year showing up the way he did . who knows how he will show this time???
i dont think he can fix everything...he also lost some shoulder width.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: adipo8 on September 10, 2007, 06:11:26 AM
Is it just me, or does there seem to be a misinformation campaign being waged against the 8-time Mr. Olympia?

First, some anonymous person states without any documentation, that Ronnie tore his tricep.  A few photoshopped and ill-angled photographs are posted purporting to support this "theory" when in reality, it's completely untrue.  The result, however, is that people now "see" something that isn't there, and the judges can justify marking Coleman down because of his lack of "symmetry".  Ignore if you will, that these are, for the most part, the same judges who never marked Yates down for his own lack of symmetry when Dorian's bicep disappeared for a few Mr. Olympias, despite Dorian's imbalance being both obvious and embarrassing.

Rather than ignore the accusations and misinformation about Ronnie's "secret injury", the magazines irresponsibly jump on board, even going so far as to have their own "pseudo-experts" analyze photos and support the smear-Ronnie campaign.



Ronnie lost because the show was on Friday and he came prepared on Saturday. The body is changing - Flatter stomachs and more shape. Ronnie has brought un matchable packages and that is what he is compared to. Jay - has been chasing Ronnie for years and now resembles ronnie in body.

Both ROnnie and Jay - are now the Arnold and Franco of bodybuilding (2007) The new version. Toney Freeman , Victor, Dexter, Silvio and others - look healthly and compete more and that is determining factor in the success of the sport.

*note - ROnnie lost 4 times not once. His time was amazing and I am sure he will battle it out for more placings however MR.Olympia is no longer an option. People are bigger , better shape and look better - that is right LOOK BETTER!

Ronnie will place outside of 6th place and Jay outside the top 2 - for the first time Ronnie will have to qualify some where else instead of the O. I doubt the european judges will be as nice.

Thank you Ronnie!




Even worse, the magazines choose to publish the absolute worst photos of Coleman from the 2006 Olympia. Whereas in the past, Coleman photos would always be dead-on straight and clear, suddenly the photographers lost their way, and the best photos of Coleman they can get are taken from angles or when he is not 100% into his poses.

Somehow, more gasoline gets thrown on the fire when a second rumor takes off that Ronnie has a torn lat. Again, ignoring the fact that no evidence exists to support the claim, before you know it, people are jumping on this one as well, and eventually it finds its way into print, which like a Muscletech advertorial, is as good as the gospel to most fans.

The end result: Ronnie's chances of winning have been damaged. Judges can justify marking him down. The fans think he lost because he's injured. Ronnie is forced to retire because of "phantom injuries".

Your thoughts?
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Deicide on September 10, 2007, 07:14:07 AM
Believe it or not, Ronnie looked best nearly ten years ago in 1998: check it out and compare it with today:



No HGH gut, nice and symmetrical, huge and cut...and afterwards it was downhill.... :-\
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Matt C on September 10, 2007, 09:12:29 AM
The computer I'm on isn't displaying pictures properly, but I believe a good photo which illustrates Ronnie's triceps injury can be found in this gallery:

http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/ronniecolemanontheroad

He is displaying the same look that Sergio did around the same age.

Ronnie suffered minor bursitis in his left arm after his victory collapse at the 2005 Mr. Olympia contest.  His other related minor injuries stemmed from that.  They are not full blown injuries and are nowhere near as significant as Dorian's were.  However, it is pretty obvious that something did happen.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Option D on September 10, 2007, 09:28:50 AM
Arnie is better than Haney and comparing him to Coleman is not even worth it; apples and oranges.

shittin me right...haney makes arnold look so soft on stage...arnold said himself "in my day we were were big and cut, but now (the late 80s) these guys are huge and ripped...


also arnie had no legs...
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: natural al on September 10, 2007, 09:31:50 AM
saying this is all a conspiracy is moronic, sorry Ed...I think your a good guy so don't take it personally but it wasn't camera magic or anything like that...it was what it was.  A great BB who's stayed around too long and time caught up with him.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on September 10, 2007, 09:36:00 AM
The Beef read that Sergio injured his triceps in a motorcycle accident.

The Beef



The computer I'm on isn't displaying pictures properly, but I believe a good photo which illustrates Ronnie's triceps injury can be found in this gallery:

http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/ronniecolemanontheroad

He is displaying the same look that Sergio did around the same age.

Ronnie suffered minor bursitis in his left arm after his victory collapse at the 2005 Mr. Olympia contest.  His other related minor injuries stemmed from that.  They are not full blown injuries and are nowhere near as significant as Dorian's were.  However, it is pretty obvious that something did happen.
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: SteelePegasus on September 10, 2007, 09:36:46 AM
saying this is all a conspiracy is moronic, sorry Ed...I think your a good guy so don't take it personally but it wasn't camera magic or anything like that...it was what it was.  A great BB who's stayed around too long and time caught up with him.

yep, for the past couple of years ronnie has looked like crap compared to his earlier victories. Father time can be a cruel man sometimes

I am not a cutler fan, but he paid his dues and was better than Ronnie last year
Title: Re: THE ANTI-COLEMAN CONSPIRACY
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 10, 2007, 12:50:10 PM
ND is quick to point out that the same judges apparently thought that dorian's injury was 'slight' and had 'no bearing' on him at all..

 ::)

and ND worships these same retarded judges.. ::)

Ronnie was the second best bodybuilder in 2006 and lost for two main reasons , his conditioning was off and his back looked very soft , Ronnie would have won if his conditioning was on period . it has nothing to do with tears Jay's back improved and Ronnie's regressed couple that with slightly better conditioning for Jay and you have the reason Ronnie lost .

and again spare me any complaints about judges you people worshiped these judges when Ronnie was in the green now he's in the red the fix is in , a very weak excuse , and Dorian 1994 had one bicep shorter than the other , his conditioning was NOT off , his trademark back wasn't washed away like Ronnie , big difference .

I said it before Ronnie can still win in 2007 if his back is on swole and his conditioning is on the money ( not that its been on the money for years see 2001 ASC ) he has the size to all he needs is the conditioning , I've told you a million times conditioning costs more people contests than anything