Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Livewire on November 09, 2007, 09:40:48 AM
-
http://www.getanabolics.com/2007/11/hardcore-bicep-tips-from-ronnie-coleman.html
Inspirational. no disrespect to the reigning Mr O... but no one on this planet can touch Ronnie Coleman on arms... wow wow wow...
-
http://www.getanabolics.com/2007/11/hardcore-bicep-tips-from-ronnie-coleman.html
Inspirational. no disrespect to the reigning Mr O... but no one on this planet can touch Ronnie Coleman on arms... wow wow wow...
No one can touch Ronnie at his prime.
Seven years later, and Jay is still years away from looking like Ronnie did in 2000.
-
No one can touch Ronnie at his prime.
Seven years later, and Jay is still years away from looking like Ronnie did in 2000.
I know. I just don't like the reigning Mr O being worse than years before.
I'm starting to appreciate what a great champion ronnie really was. I always wanted him to lose (cause i love chaos). but today we're stuck with synthol shoulder jerks.
-
That's from 'The Unbelieveable' i watched it again a week ago and i'm still amazed, my jaw dropped!
I've seen lots of pics and videos of coleman, but this one video is above them all!
-
No one can touch Ronnie at his prime.
agreed! 8)
-
Looks really surreal how his bis flex.... like some living organism encapsulated in plastic.
Awesome.
-
Ronnie = Best ever
-
I know. I just don't like the reigning Mr O being worse than years before.
I'm starting to appreciate what a great champion ronnie really was. I always wanted him to lose (cause i love chaos). but today we're stuck with synthol shoulder jerks.
Exactly. Jay is a step back. But then again, how far can we push the human body? It may full well not be possible to get bigger and more muscular than Ronnie was at his peak.
-
Exactly. Jay is a step back. But then again, how far can we push the human body? It may full well not be possible to get bigger and more muscular than Ronnie was at his peak.
Maybe Dennis Wolf can do it.. He is already huge and not yet 30.
-
Maybe Dennis Wolf can do it.. He is already huge and not yet 30.
It's possible...
In 1992, Ronnie was the same age as Dennis and he was a decade away from reaching his peak. I think if anyone can do it, Dennis may full well be the one. No matter how you cut it, that's a daunting task though, but only time will tell.
-
that wasnt one bit inspirational
just some pussy preacher curls
-
that wasnt one bit inspirational
just some pussy preacher curls
Nasser would have used the 200s ;D
-
220's
-
best biceps ever. but levrone has him on triceps.
-
agreed! 8)
Your agreeing with that!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Get out of town.........
-
Nasser would have used the 200s ;D
wait...how many Mr O's does Nasser have?
*silence*
thats what I thought!
-
He should have 10-20 right now
-
Ronnie is the king
-
best biceps ever. but levrone has him on triceps.
Coleman's tris were huge, with solid definition.
-
Maybe Dennis Wolf can do it.. He is already huge and not yet 30.
Doubt it.
For my money Ronnie was the most muscular human ever in his prime. If he didn't have weird abs there would be no debate on this.
Wolf just doesn't have the amazing genetics Ronnie had. No one does.
As far as Cutler being several years away......no. He will never eclipse Ronnie in his prime, doesn't have the horses.
-
Doubt it.
For my money Ronnie was the most muscular human ever in his prime. If he didn't have weird abs there would be no debate on this.
Wolf just doesn't have the amazing genetics Ronnie had. No one does.
As far as Cutler being several years away......no. He will never eclipse Ronnie in his prime,
doesn't have the horses.
Doesn't have the genetics nor the heart >:(
-
It's my opinion that Ronnie never used high levels of insulin.
his skin stayed thin. He has veins shooting out of his arms still. Remember when cutler had them his rookie year, and his veins actually got much LESS ten year later when he won the O?
insulin makes the skin thicker. period. and ronnie's skin never got thicker.
-
It's my opinion that Ronnie never used high levels of insulin.
his skin stayed thin. He has veins shooting out of his arms still. Remember when cutler had them his rookie year, and his veins actually got much LESS ten year later when he won the O?
insulin makes the skin thicker. period. and ronnie's skin never got thicker.
That's because Jay has mediocre genetics.
I look at jay and I can mentally connect the dots that if put into my body what he's put into his, I would look similar.
I look at Ronnie and realize there isn't a drug on earth that would get me close to that.
I'm not comparing myself to Jay (the non-idiots realize this hopefully)
-
That's because Jay has mediocre genetics.
I look at jay and I can mentally connect the dots that if put into my body what he's put into his, I would look similar.
I look at Ronnie and realize there isn't a drug on earth that would get me close to that.
I'm not comparing myself to Jay (the non-idiots realize this hopefully)
WHO are you to compare yourself to JAY? :D ;D
-
Levrone has Coleman on triceps every time. Period.
-
Levrone has Coleman on triceps every time. Period.
Coleman has Levrone on Sandows every time. Period.
-
Coleman has Levrone on Sandows every time. Period.
We're talking about arms so I bet you feel great about that point. ::)
-
Levrone has Coleman on triceps every time. Period.
yes... but keep in mind Ron tri's are not that impressive :-\
-
yes... but keep in mind Ron tri's are not that impressive :-\
Not according to many on here. There is much about Ronnie that is unimpressive but he has his wins and that's that.
-
yes... but keep in mind Ron tri's are not that impressive :-\
They said that Schwarzenegger as well, but they had great arms and tris are 2/3s of their size. The only problem is that their definition's just ok, and the bis are so outrageous that the rest is overshadowed. There's size there both bis and tris.
-
yes... but keep in mind Ron tri's are not that impressive :-\
according to who?:
-
according to who?:
Anyone who knows a damn thing about bodybuilding ;)
-
Even Badell admitted that Jay has great triceps and Ronnie has great biceps but neither has complete arms, which is true.
-
Anyone who knows a damn thing about bodybuilding ;)
if you knew a damn thing about bodybuilding you would know that comparing how Ronnie looked in 99 to how he looked with 10 pounds of water on top in 2000 is stupid.
:)
Ronnie's arms in 99 put Levrone's to shame 8):
-
if you knew a damn thing about bodybuilding you would know that comparing how Ronnie looked in 99 to how he looked with 10 pounds of water on top in 2000 is stupid.
:)
Ronnie's arms in 99 put Levrone's to shame 8):
Why his triceps still lagged behind Levrone year doesn't matter his triceps aren't world class his biceps are out of this world his triceps aren't old news .........except to the ignorant
Badell crushed him too
-
Why his triceps still lagged behind Levrone year doesn't matter his triceps aren't world class his biceps are out of this world his triceps aren't old news .........except to the ignorant
Badell crushed him too
you are a total idiot.
you think 2005 Ronnie has anything to do with peak ronnie?
::)
-
Both are the same weight whats the excuse this time?
-
I still find it funny that ND is so blindly stupid that he can look at the two shots I posted from 99 and say Ronnie's tris weren't world class.
LOL ::)
2005 ronnie's tris = shit
1999 Ronnie's tris = amazing.
-
Both are the same weight whats the excuse this time?
Ronnie 98 is 10 pounds of lean muscle mass less than Ronnie 99 genius.
anyone can have better tris with Ronnie at less than peak form.
in 99 even his damn CALVES were ripped!
-
I'm curious, what exactly are you supposed to see in this picture?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=180004.0;attach=210568;image)
-
you are a total idiot.
you think 2005 Ronnie has anything to do with peak ronnie?
::)
" peak " Ronnie still had shit triceps compared to Levrone and a lot of other people his side triceps shot sucked no matter what year
-
I'm curious, what exactly are you supposed to see in this picture?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=180004.0;attach=210568;image)
fantastic huge and ripped tris.
-
Ronnie 98 is 10 pounds of lean muscle mass less than Ronnie 99 genius.
anyone can have better tris with Ronnie at less than peak form.
in 99 even his damn CALVES were ripped!
Peak is 1998 sorry sport Ronnie HIMSELF said 1998 was his best Olympia showing specifically because his conditioning was spot-on , meaning his conditioning 1999 was NOT spot-on
Ronnie never had a great side triceps shot its old news
-
fantastic huge and ripped tris.
Coleman's lateral head was small due to the genetic shape. At 2005 even at 275lbs he lateral head was small and he was OWNED by baddel.
-
fantastic huge and ripped tris.
lmfao what a fan-boy lol " fantastic huge and ripped tris " how homo can you get? his whole side triceps shot sucks , stick to post most musculars , Levrone and many others easily beat Coleman in this pose
-
you are a total idiot.
you think 2005 Ronnie has anything to do with peak ronnie?
::)
He can't pose the triceps to save his life. The lighting in those 99 pics make his incredible biceps look all-time best and crappy triceps look good. No offense but any time you bring up a comparison with Ronnie looking like crap compared to a competitor, it always deals with him past or before his prime. I understand the argument but c'mon. He's had flaws all along but they were overlooked, like some other competitors. When Ronnie was taking 6-10th place he looked better than he did in 01, 02, 05, 06, 07.
-
Coleman's lateral head was small due to the genetic shape. At 2005 even at 275lbs he lateral head was small and he was OWNED by baddel.
Thats the year he LOST the challenge round and he was so furious he was seeing red backstage lol judge by a panel of his peers and they obvious voted for the guy who has a great side triceps shot.
-
He can't pose the triceps to save his life. The lighting in those 99 pics make his incredible biceps look all-time best and crappy triceps look good. No offense but any time you bring up a comparison with Ronnie looking like crap compared to a competitor, it always deals with him past or before his prime. I understand the argument but c'mon. He's had flaws all along but they were overlooked, like some other competitors. When Ronnie was taking 6-10th place he looked better than he did in 01, 02, 05, 06, 07.
Great post !
-
No offense but any time you bring up a comparison with Ronnie looking like crap compared to a competitor, it always deals with him past or before his prime. I understand the argument but c'mon.
good you understand the argument. and its not just ronnie that this applies to. for example,
dorian 93 looked different than he did in either 92, 94, 95, 96 or 97.
Ronnie 99 is no different.
it is not an 'argument'.
it is FACT.
People in their all time best shape often look much better in lots of ways over their 'less than peak' form.
its a fact in this sport.
it is well known. or at least should be.
-
good you understand the argument. and its not just ronnie that this applies to. for example,
dorian 93 looked different than he did in either 92, 94, 95, 96 or 97.
Ronnie 99 is no different.
it is not an 'argument'.
it is FACT.
People in their all time best shape often look much better in lots of ways over their 'less than peak' form.
its a fact in this sport.
it is well known. or at least should be.
Hey Mr Peak see above 98 where Levrone is schooling Ronnie in triceps , Ronnie called his 98 Olympia showing his best ( peak )
-
Hey Mr Peak see above 98 where Levrone is schooling Ronnie in triceps , Ronnie called his 98 Olympia showing his best ( peak )
he has also called his 99 shape his best - right at the contest.
deal with it
-
he has also called his 99 shape his best - right at the contest.
deal with it
So you say ;) a couple of weeks ago reflecting on his career he specifically stated 1998 was his best Olympia showing ever and why? because his conditioning was SPOT-mother-fucking-ON deal with it ;)
I own YOU KID
-
Triceps' gone ???
(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/2005-mr-olympia-preview/ac01.jpg)
-
I am not saying that 99 Ronnie has better tris than Levrone.
what I AM saying is that they were good enough to stand up to his without getting blown off stage, something that 2005 Ronnie or whatever the hell pic was posted here with Badell were not.
but keep in mind: in overall arms, Ronnie's incredible definition and vascularity set his arms apart from Kevin's or anyone elses for that matter.
including Lee Preist.
-
Triceps' gone ???
(http://www.bodybuildingpro.com/2005-mr-olympia-preview/ac01.jpg)
like I said, 2005/6 whatever Ronnie's tris sucked in some angles.
-
good you understand the argument. and its not just ronnie that this applies to. for example,
dorian 93 looked different than he did in either 92, 94, 95, 96 or 97.
Ronnie 99 is no different.
it is not an 'argument'.
it is FACT.
People in their all time best shape often look much better in lots of ways over their 'less than peak' form.
its a fact in this sport.
it is well known. or at least should be.
Oh and slick Dorian's triceps looked great NO matter what year get it?
1992
1993
1994
1995
Need anything else corrected?
-
I am not saying that 99 Ronnie has better tris than Levrone.
what I AM saying is that they were good enough to stand up to his without getting blown off stage, something that 2005 Ronnie or whatever the hell pic was posted here with Badell were not.
but keep in mind: in overall arms, Ronnie's incredible definition and vascularity set his arms apart from Kevin's or anyone elses for that matter.
including Lee Preist.
LMFAO including Lee Priest who Ronnie does NOT have better triceps than either old news , Ronnie's biceps are outstanding , his triceps are forearms are NOT to argue other wise is Hulkster ( retarded )
-
(http://img54.echo.cx/img54/7492/okyo8hw.jpg)
(http://img122.echo.cx/img122/4149/dorian93ronnie0317lr.jpg)
(http://img122.echo.cx/img122/6428/dorian93ronnie038em.jpg)
.. 8)
-
(http://img54.echo.cx/img54/7492/okyo8hw.jpg)
(http://img122.echo.cx/img122/4149/dorian93ronnie0317lr.jpg)
(http://img122.echo.cx/img122/6428/dorian93ronnie038em.jpg)
.. 8)
Golden frogs lol
-
Oh and slick Dorian's triceps looked great NO matter what year get it?
1992
1993
1994
1995
Need anything else corrected?
yeah, but look at the REST of him dumbass.. ::)
thanks for proving my point.
-
don't even start with the Lee Priest bullshit.
that was already put to bed in another thread.
lee did NOT have the definition to compete with these arms:
sorry:
-
yeah, but look at the REST of him dumbass.. ::)
thanks for proving my point.
Again he wasn't peak in 92 or 94 yet his triceps didn't change your excuse he wasn't peak is pathetic
-
good you understand the argument. and its not just ronnie that this applies to. for example,
dorian 93 looked different than he did in either 92, 94, 95, 96 or 97.
Ronnie 99 is no different.
it is not an 'argument'.
it is FACT.
People in their all time best shape often look much better in lots of ways over their 'less than peak' form.
its a fact in this sport.
it is well known. or at least should be.
That's fine but Dorian didn't lose his triceps until his final O. Ronnie never had them. Dorian lost his biceps early on but never really had them begin with anyway. The thing is that each one had a better opposing BP to make up for the other. Dorian's side tricep and back helped him win where his biceps failed him. Ronnie never had the same luck in the side tri pose.
-
don't even start with the Lee Priest bullshit.
that was already put to bed in another thread.
lee did NOT have the definition to compete with these arms:
sorry:
NO moron YOU started with the Priest shit ;) need anything else corrected? definition is NOT the only criteria in having outstanding ARMS pay attention to the word ARMS moron biceps/triceps/forearms Lee Priest has Ronnie covered period.
-
Again he wasn't peak in 92 or 94 yet his triceps didn't change your excuse he wasn't peak is pathetic
I never said dorian's triceps changed.
man, english is really hard for you isn't it?
-
That's fine but Dorian didn't lose his triceps until his final O. Ronnie never had them. Dorian lost his biceps early on but never really had them begin with anyway. The thing is that each one had a better opposing BP to make up for the other. Dorian's side tricep and back helped him win where his biceps failed him. Ronnie never had the same luck in the side tri pose.
I mean you know what you're talking about this kid is clueless , great post.
-
I never said dorian's triceps changed.
man, english is really hard for you isn't it?
Stop fixating on nonsense you used the excuse of peak VS no-peak and you were corrected it doesn't matter peak or non peak Ronnie's triceps still left a lot to be desired especially compared to guys who had them , and his whole side triceps pose sucked no matter what year and why? lack of a great side head , lack of balance & proportion , lack of calves , a protruding midsection it NOT a strong pose for him , if you knew anything other than hero-worship you'd know this but you don't and you won't listen to people who do know this that makes you ignorant and biased . nothing new.
-
Ron:
Please put ND and Hulkster in timeout.
Thanks,
-"The Master"
-
Ron:
Please put ND and Hulkster in timeout.
Thanks,
-"The Master"
:-X
-
No one can touch Ronnie at his prime.
Seven years later, and Jay is still years away from looking like Ronnie did in 2000.
Jay's more like 5 or 6 years from that. Jay's like an eternity and two different parents from looking like that. And I shook his hand in the gym today. I like him alot, I really do. But Ronnie, I'm not sure we will ever see anything like that ever again, I really am not sure. Watching The Unbelievable for the first time I knew I was looking at the end of all things to come! And I don't even know what that means! ;D
-
agreed. we have yet to see a physique that can match prime Ronnie, and with the way things are going, we may never.
Wolfe is the only one with the potential right now, but even then, do his genetics allow for the detail and refinement ronnie had?
hard to say.
-
this picture is all the evidence you need of Coleman's dominance. :o
-
Coleman in The Unbelievable was awesome. I was awed watching it for the first time but he was 5 weeks out and training hard so the condition I saw was different than what I would see onstage in pics. No doubt freaky but I think that Ronnie onstage was not as impressive to me as the guys I saw on ESPN when I was younger or in the 90's mags.
-
In 1999 or 2000, Flex mag ran a series of black and white pics of the 1999 Olympia. Ronnie was running commentary on the pics. In one pic, Flex was pinching the lateral head of his tris, while comparing his to Ronnie's. Ronnie (from my memory) said , "Flex is trying to show that his tris are better than mine, he should point out any thing he has on me, because it's not much"
ND, do you have that Flex or those photos?
-
this picture is all the evidence you need of Coleman's dominance. :o
Some of the geniuses here don't understand anatomy enough to know that this arm is in large part due to huge triceps. Not as defined as Yates but much bigger.
This arm isn't just biceps.
-
In 1999 or 2000, Flex mag ran a series of black and white pics of the 1999 Olympia. Ronnie was running commentary on the pics. In one pic, Flex was pinching the lateral head of his tris, while comparing his to Ronnie's. Ronnie (from my memory) said , "Flex is trying to show that his tris are better than mine, he should point out any thing he has on me, because it's not much"
ND, do you have that Flex or those photos?
Idiot IceCold claims to have all the 90's mags, but of course he doesn't.
-
Hulkster, do you deny that Coleman's head changed shape and size since 1998?
-
Seven years later, and Jay is still years away from looking like Ronnie did in 2000.
WRONG..
Jay will never look like Ronnie
-
In 1999 or 2000, Flex mag ran a series of black and white pics of the 1999 Olympia. Ronnie was running commentary on the pics. In one pic, Flex was pinching the lateral head of his tris, while comparing his to Ronnie's. Ronnie (from my memory) said , "Flex is trying to show that his tris are better than mine, he should point out any thing he has on me, because it's not much"
ND, do you have that Flex or those photos?
see the following post.
-
Idiot IceCold claims to have all the 90's mags, but of course he doesn't.
when i said i literarlly own your faggott ass in every post, i meant it.
Flex, november 2001, page 142.
i dont have a scanner, but this feature is about ronnie looking at photos from 99 (by the way he looks nothing like the adjusted dvd screen caps hukster keeps posting) and telling his thoughts.
"making a point":
"flex is trying to point out that maybe his triceps are better than mine are. My reply was, 'hey, my triceps are just as big, but they're way, way harder than yours are'. The other bodypart flex likes to point out in comparison to mine is abdominals. That's the only bodypart he really figures to have on me 'cause his abs stack up higher than mine, his ab frame being a little bigger. It didnt rile me. He should should point every strong point he has over me - which actually wont involve much pointing. "
(ps, dumpster, i know how faggott (homo) is really spelled, but you can see how it comes out. whether i spell or make typos, that still doesnt change the fact about you and your bowflex or the numerous threads made soley to bash you.)
-
(ps, dumpster, i know how faggott (####) is really spelled, but you can see how it comes out. whether i spell or make typos, that still doesnt change the fact about you and your bowflex or the numerous threads made soley to bash you.)
meltdown
-
ronie colemanhas huuuuge triceps.. possible some of the biggest ever to grace a bb stage..
thing is they lack seperation i think its a genetic thing same as his weird abs....
but make no mistake his tris a huge and hanging
-
ronie colemanhas huuuuge triceps.. possible some of the biggest ever to grace a bb stage..
thing is they lack seperation i think its a genetic thing same as his weird abs....
but make no mistake his tris a huge and hanging
Exactly; anyone who doesn't get this doesn't really understand basic anatomy. He had average cuts, just like Schwarzenegger. Both had good tri size but aren't given credit because of the lack of extreme detail, which is only one aspect of judging.
-
ronie colemanhas huuuuge triceps.. possible some of the biggest ever to grace a bb stage..
thing is they lack seperation i think its a genetic thing same as his weird abs....
but make no mistake his tris a huge and hanging
No one arguing they're not huge just not great in terms of separation and side head shape.
-
when i said i literarlly own your faggott ass in every post, i meant it.
Flex, november 2001, page 142.
i dont have a scanner, but this feature is about ronnie looking at photos from 99 (by the way he looks nothing like the adjusted dvd screen caps hukster keeps posting) and telling his thoughts.
"making a point":
"flex is trying to point out that maybe his triceps are better than mine are. My reply was, 'hey, my triceps are just as big, but they're way, way harder than yours are'. The other bodypart flex likes to point out in comparison to mine is abdominals. That's the only bodypart he really figures to have on me 'cause his abs stack up higher than mine, his ab frame being a little bigger. It didnt rile me. He should should point every strong point he has over me - which actually wont involve much pointing. "
(ps, dumpster, i know how faggott (####) is really spelled, but you can see how it comes out. whether i spell or make typos, that still doesnt change the fact about you and your bowflex or the numerous threads made soley to bash you.)
dman Hulkster just got bitch slapped again lol
owned
-
Coleman HAD great tricep size but his size and look will never match that of Levrone. A second important point is that he could never pose the muscle, which is the same problem he had in side chest.
-
Coleman HAD great tricep size but his size and look will never match that of Levrone. A second important point is that he could never pose the muscle, which is the same problem he had in side chest.
You get it , these ignorant fucks think Ronnie had the best side tri ever and his side chest was on par with Arnold ::) Ronnie never looked that great from the side as he did in the front or back poses
-
Do you think that his lack in tricep size, is genetic, or because he always trained his bis since he was 13. He stated that that was all he did in his room at night as a kid. And I think his tris have lagged behind his bis ever since. Just look at Levrone's bis, they have no "pop" to them, and have a okay peak, but, his tris are off the meter.
-
ronnie had great bis. no question...
but his bis would have looked no different if he had of just picked his nose.
as ronnie stated, he just put a few bi exercises in after back just because. his bis were genetically huge and peaked.
he could have saved himself the time imo and done something else after training his back (plenty of bi stimulation to keep his bis in exactly the same condition). does anyone honestly think it would have made any difference?
-
ronnie had great bis. no question...
but his bis would have looked no different if he had of just picked his nose.
as ronnie stated, he just put a few bi exercises in after back just because. his bis were genetically huge and peaked.
he could have saved himself the time imo and done something else after training his back (plenty of bi stimulation to keep his bis in exactly the same condition). does anyone honestly think it would have made any difference?
Like train his calves?
-
Like train his calves?
;D
either that or put more oil in 'em. :-\
-
Idiot IceCold claims to have all the 90's mags, but of course he doesn't.
i have that mag and in that article Ronnie doesn't say that Flex has better triceps he says, "Flex is trying to point out that his triceps are better but as you can see my triceps are just as big and a lot harder than his'.
-
In 1999 or 2000, Flex mag ran a series of black and white pics of the 1999 Olympia. Ronnie was running commentary on the pics. In one pic, Flex was pinching the lateral head of his tris, while comparing his to Ronnie's. Ronnie (from my memory) said , "Flex is trying to show that his tris are better than mine, he should point out any thing he has on me, because it's not much"
ND, do you have that Flex or those photos?
that's not what he said in those pics, the part where he said that Flex should point out anything he had that was better he was talking about abs which he said were better than his.
-
i have that mag and in that article Ronnie doesn't say that Flex has better triceps he says, "Flex is trying to point out that his triceps are better but as you can see my triceps are just as big and a lot harder than his'.
Flex's triceps crushes Ronnies thats old news
-
You get it , these ignorant fucks think Ronnie had the best side tri ever and his side chest was on par with Arnold ::) Ronnie never looked that great from the side as he did in the front or back poses
hahah in that tris shot, ronnie is a bugatti veyron to kevin's lotus anything . . .
-
Flex's triceps crushes Ronnies thats old news
my Lord!!!!!!!!!!!!! look at the size of that left leg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! must be at least 20 inches. ;D
-
;D
either that or put more oil in 'em. :-\
Superior genetics but he couldn't build up calves more? Sure he has crappy insertions but he could have built them without the oil he used.
-
lee priest has the best arms of this time period....bi's, tri's and forearms are all topnotch....ronnie was very, very, very good in his prime as far as arms go but he DIDN'T have the best tri's, his bi's were great and his arms were very defined but tri's were not his strongpoint.
*I "think" the forearm pic is Priest....if not sorry but I'm pretty sure it is and it's pretty damn :o :o :o
-
Superior genetics but he couldn't build up calves more? Sure he has crappy insertions but he could have built them without the oil he used.
oil? ::)
ronnie's calves have looked just as crappy throughout his whole career, save for a tiny size increase, while the rest of him grew by leaps and bounds.
there is no idication of oil what so ever.
-
when i said i literarlly own your faggott ass in every post, i meant it.
Flex, november 2001, page 142.
i dont have a scanner, but this feature is about ronnie looking at photos from 99 (by the way he looks nothing like the adjusted dvd screen caps hukster keeps posting) and telling his thoughts.
"making a point":
"flex is trying to point out that maybe his triceps are better than mine are. My reply was, 'hey, my triceps are just as big, but they're way, way harder than yours are'. The other bodypart flex likes to point out in comparison to mine is abdominals. That's the only bodypart he really figures to have on me 'cause his abs stack up higher than mine, his ab frame being a little bigger. It didnt rile me. He should should point every strong point he has over me - which actually wont involve much pointing. "
(ps, dumpster, i know how faggott (####) is really spelled, but you can see how it comes out. whether i spell or make typos, that still doesnt change the fact about you and your bowflex or the numerous threads made soley to bash you.)
you may have that mag but you don't have other key ones from the period, like the M and F with the 99 Olympia coverage, or the Ironman with the 99 olympia coverage.
and be glad you don't: they would own your ass even more in the truce thread.
-
You get it , these ignorant fucks think Ronnie had the best side tri ever and his side chest was on par with Arnold ::) Ronnie never looked that great from the side as he did in the front or back poses
quotes for any of this please, you lying idiot..
>:(
::)
-
oil? ::)
ronnie's calves have looked just as crappy throughout his whole career, save for a tiny size increase, while the rest of him grew by leaps and bounds.
there is no idication of oil what so ever.
There is something funky going on with his calf size increase. Definitely weird looking.
-
lee priest has the best arms of this time period....bi's, tri's and forearms are all topnotch....ronnie was very, very, very good in his prime as far as arms go but he DIDN'T have the best tri's, his bi's were great and his arms were very defined but tri's were not his strongpoint.
*I "think" the forearm pic is Priest....if not sorry but I'm pretty sure it is and it's pretty damn :o :o :o
again, all the shots of lee's arms are never onstage.
they always seem to be in offseason shape - ie usually much thicker than in contest shape.
onstage, his arms looked soft compared to Ronnie's:
this is my biggest beef with saying he has the best arms of the period.
he has AMAZING arms, but Ronnie's detail and refinement set him apart from all the rest. IMO.
-
There is something funky going on with his calf size increase. Definitely weird looking.
size increase?
his calves have looked pretty much the same for years now.
his genetics, like the genetic predispositon for his abs, sucks big time.
-
Not on par with Arnold? When will people accpet that arnolds side chest isnt really that good. Yes his titanic pecs and huge rib cage look impressive but the pose isnt judged solely on that. From the waist downwards he doesnt impress and factor in lack of tri sweep and relatively poor delts esp. rear and your left with a pose when viewed against others is average.
-
size increase?
his calves have looked pretty much the same for years now.
his genetics, like the genetic predispositon for his abs, sucks big time.
His calves changed size and those pics have been shown before.
Not on par with Arnold? When will people accpet that arnolds side chest isnt really that good. Yes his titanic pecs and huge rib cage look impressive but the pose isnt judged solely on that. From the waist downwards he doesnt impress and factor in lack of tri sweep and relatively poor delts esp. rear and your left with a pose when viewed against others is average.
You're a moron. He epitomized that pose. He actually holds in his waist and yes it is based on your chest. Ronnie turns it into a bicep and front delt pose. Legs were not a big deal in Arnold's time but he still had good thighs considering.
-
You're a moron. He epitomized that pose. He actually holds in his waist and yes it is based on your chest. Ronnie turns it into a bicep and front delt pose. Legs were not a big deal in Arnold's time but he still had good thighs considering.
Moron? Why? Because i expressed my opinion. Your'e correct, the pose is based on your chest but having the best chest doesnt guarantee you win the pose. A front double bicep isnt based purely on the bis.
Ronnie hasnt turned it into a bicep pose at all. He, just like otheres performs it differently to older bbers.
Levrone doesnt have the best of chests but its hard to argue he doesnt have the best side chest pose.
-
again, all the shots of lee's arms are never onstage.
they always seem to be in offseason shape - ie usually much thicker than in contest shape.
onstage, his arms looked soft compared to Ronnie's:
this is my biggest beef with saying he has the best arms of the period.
he has AMAZING arms, but Ronnie's detail and refinement set him apart from all the rest. IMO.
hulkster, you worry me. Honestly....do you see a doctor cause you're obsession with Ronnie is just plain old wierd. You can't seem to admit that anyone beats ronnie on anything....dont' you find that odd? do you honestly worship a guy this much or is it an act? you seem like yoiu HAVE to show those 99 screen shots every chance you get.........strange, strange, strange.
-
hulkster, you worry me. Honestly....do you see a doctor cause you're obsession with Ronnie is just plain old wierd. You can't seem to admit that anyone beats ronnie on anything....dont' you find that odd? do you honestly worship a guy this much or is it an act? you seem like yoiu HAVE to show those 99 screen shots every chance you get.........strange, strange, strange.
Um, most BB authorities consider Coleman the best all-time.
Priest did *not* have Coleman's detail, biceps peak or flow, given the stubiness factor.
To repeat, Coleman had good tris, huge.
-
Um, most BB authorities consider Coleman the best all-time.
Priest did *not* have Coleman's detail, biceps peak or flow, given the stubiness factor.
To repeat, Coleman had good tris, huge.
even if he is the best alltime that doesn't mean he has the best individual bodyparts off alltime, his overall package was great but that doesn't mean everypart of that package beats everone else's. Ronnie had good shoulders but they can't touch Levrone's for example, Ronnies abs can't touch John Hnatyshack's-sp-abs but ronnie is alot better BB.
-
Moron? Why? Because i expressed my opinion. Your'e correct, the pose is based on your chest but having the best chest doesnt guarantee you win the pose. A front double bicep isnt based purely on the bis.
Ronnie hasnt turned it into a bicep pose at all. He, just like otheres performs it differently to older bbers.
Levrone doesnt have the best of chests but its hard to argue he doesnt have the best side chest pose.
Ronnie turned the side chest into a bicep and front delt pose because 1.) he can't pose for shit, 2.) it hides his gut.
As for Lee P, his short arms do not change the fact that his total arm package was better than Coleman's. If bicep peak was an extremely important criteria then Scott, Oliva, and Levrone have shitty arms which I disagree with. If we compare every Lee P bicep picture to a perfect lighting shot of 1999 then everybody's arms suck, which is also untrue.
-
you may have that mag but you don't have other key ones from the period, like the M and F with the 99 Olympia coverage, or the Ironman with the 99 olympia coverage.
and be glad you don't: they would own your ass even more in the truce thread.
so this is how you react are getting severly owned.
i dont have the ironman, but i do have the muscle and fitness olympia coverage from 99.
give me a week or so to get it and i will post whatever you want from it.
and like i said earlier, you will be and are owned in every post.
this will be just another chance to prove you wrong.
againg.
-
hukster,
do you see al and cap owning your pathetic ass?
but, you'll claim that EVERYONE on this thread is talking about how great ronnie's triceps are, when in reality its just you and bowflex/dumpster.
do a fucking count if you dont think so.
you are the worst notorious guy on this board - just like glenrrr from mayhem.
congrats.
hahahaha.
-
even if he is the best alltime that doesn't mean he has the best individual bodyparts off alltime, his overall package was great but that doesn't mean everypart of that package beats everone else's. Ronnie had good shoulders but they can't touch Levrone's for example, Ronnies abs can't touch John Hnatyshack's-sp-abs but ronnie is alot better BB.
these clowns think that ronnie has the best everything - except the obvious oil filled calves and worst midsection of any top bber of all time.
they even think ronnie has better legs than platz.
::)
(do a search for the thread and you'll see the same exact thing - huckster posting pics of ronnie from 99, dumpster/bowflex agrees, and then huckster thinks the entire thread/board agrees with him.
-
To repeat, Coleman had good tris, huge.
sure thing, there, bill.
(http://digilander.libero.it/mrolympia2/rc11.jpg)
(ps, arent triceps suppossed to have 3 heads.)
lol.
-
quotes for any of this please, you lying idiot..
>:(
::)
You're the fucking idiot who claimed Ronnie has better calves than Dorian and better quads than Platz lol and you're the liar who created quotes that I exposed you on ;)
-
hulkster, you worry me. Honestly....do you see a doctor cause you're obsession with Ronnie is just plain old wierd. You can't seem to admit that anyone beats ronnie on anything....dont' you find that odd? do you honestly worship a guy this much or is it an act? you seem like yoiu HAVE to show those 99 screen shots every chance you get.........strange, strange, strange.
Great post ! lol
-
again, all the shots of lee's arms are never onstage.
they always seem to be in offseason shape - ie usually much thicker than in contest shape.
onstage, his arms looked soft compared to Ronnie's:
this is my biggest beef with saying he has the best arms of the period.
he has AMAZING arms, but Ronnie's detail and refinement set him apart from all the rest. IMO.
LMFAO soft you're delusional period. Priest's arms are the yardstick in which perfect arms are measured by , forearms , triceps and biceps all in harmony with each other , great separation , detail and vascularity he lacks NOTHING Ronnie is lacking in forearms & triceps its a NO BRIANER
-
again, all the shots of lee's arms are never onstage.
they always seem to be in offseason shape - ie usually much thicker than in contest shape.
onstage, his arms looked soft compared to Ronnie's:
this is my biggest beef with saying he has the best arms of the period.
he has AMAZING arms, but Ronnie's detail and refinement set him apart from all the rest. IMO.
ronnie's arms have never looked like this.
and in case you were going to make up some more shit, this is an onstage/contest shot.
ronnie's arms to a very few, may look better than lee's in the mm, but not close in EVERY other shot.
why do you think the most muscular is the deciding factor for all in bbing?
talk about someone who needs a clue.
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/big/2006/2006impics_pre286.jpg)
-
When you see Lee P hit a tricep shot, you really have seen what a tricep should look like. FOREARMS are present and triceps are huge, hard and ripped. Lee is never lacking in arm vascularity and his biceps are big and hard. To critique a guy for bone length is really reaching.
-
ronnie's arms have never looked like this.
and in case you were going to make up some more shit, this is an onstage/contest shot.
ronnie's arms to a very few, may look better than lee's in the mm, but not close in EVERY other shot.
why do you think the most muscular is the deciding factor for all in bbing?
talk about someone who needs a clue.
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/big/2006/2006impics_pre286.jpg)
Thats because he doesn't know how bodybuilding contests are judged , he's ignorant I mean you've exposed him on this dozens of times as well as me and others he's hopeless .
Great post as usual .
-
When you see Lee P hit a tricep shot, you really have seen what a tricep should look like. FOREARMS are present and triceps are huge, hard and ripped. Lee is never lacking in arm vascularity and his biceps are big and hard. To critique a guy for bone length is really reaching.
Great post !
Lee's arms lack absolutely nothing he has it all his arms are simply outstanding .
-
To critique a guy for bone length is really reaching.
Not at all; his arms are too short for his torso, effecting his balance. Everyone i thought knew this.
Great forearms but realistically forearms aren't a prerequisite for great arms and aren't worth as much. Schwarzenegger & Coleman with arguably the best ever arms and pretty much the same attributes including mediocre forearms proved that.
-
Not at all; his arms are too short for his torso, effecting his balance. Everyone i thought knew this.
Great forearms but realistically forearms aren't a prerequisite for great arms and aren't worth as much. Schwarzenegger & Coleman with arguably the best ever arms and pretty much the same attributes including mediocre forearms proved that.
Monster irony Ronnie has arms to long for his torso but thats just fine ::) typical hypocritical fan-boy Arnold or Ronnie don't have the best arms ever , they both lag behind Priest in triceps/forearms not to mention proportion in relation to each other what other excuses are you working on? because this one besides being wrong is dumb.
-
Monster irony Ronnie has arms to long for his torso but thats just fine ::) typical hypocritical fan-boy Arnold or Ronnie don't have the best arms ever , they both lag behind Priest in triceps/forearms not to mention proportion in relation to each other what other excuses are you working on? because this one besides being wrong is dumb.
Since his arms are clearly too short for the torso, really who cares what you say LOL
Absolutely no striations or detail anywhere on those upper arms in this shot.
-
What's ironic to me about a number of BBers in the current era is that they built their legs up at the expense of their calves, but that is ignored. In the current era developing small bodyparts is not important, something that Lee Priest has done in all aspects (you could knock him on chest I guess). To me, a guy's bone length is irrelevant because he cannot change that and he built up some crazy arms.
Why is it that in a time where guys can put on muscle easier that they neglect easy muscle groups? At least in Arnold's era his forearms and thighs weren't enormous but he was more balanced than Coleman.
-
Since his arms are clearly too short for the torso, really who cares what you say LOL
Absolutely no striations or detail anywhere on those upper arms in this shot.
Again Coleman's arms are to long for his torso but you'll gloss right over that ::) each one of his arm muscles are proportionate to each other you CAN NOT find that in Ronnie or Arnold on top of having world class biceps , Lee has world class triceps and forearms its not open for discussion any ' defect ' you attempt to find is render moot Lee has much better ARMS ( key word ) than Coleman or Schwarzenegger
-
;)
-
Ronnie has the best arms with forearms like this lmfao sure you're right
-
some are such bodybuilding followers but have no clue.... whatsoever
...
lee preisets have =great arms no doubt but the reason.. lee..heath and to some degree flex... and levrone arms will look soo amazing is.... due to othe lacking bodyparts.. mainly chest.... none of the guys have great chests.. or big huge backs like coleman....so their arms look extra amazing due to not so amazing lackin bodyparts..
ronnie has big everything that what makes him the greatest...
levrone had great tris thats it.. tris too big for bi's that had non existent peak.
greatest arms..
ronnie
-
some are such bodybuilding followers but have no clue.... whatsoever
...
lee preisets have =great arms no doubt but the reason.. lee..heath and to some degree flex... and levrone arms will look soo amazing is.... due to othe lacking bodyparts.. mainly chest.... none of the guys have great chests.. or big huge backs like coleman....so their arms look extra amazing due to not so amazing lackin bodyparts..
ronnie has big everything that what makes him the greatest...
levrone had great tris thats it.. tris too big for bi's that had non existent peak.
greatest arms..
ronnie
exactly, Ronnie is simply mind boggling.
-
yes that picture is freaky
..all while having the biggest back and one of the biggest chests in the world...
...
leverone ..mediorce chest ..
lee same
flex same
heath same...
all those arm guys...
coleman is a arm chest guy..back guy..
and that to me is what really big arms are about not massive arms ..with lacking chest and back with aids the illusion
ronnie best arms overalll period
-
yes that picture is freaky
..all while having the biggest back and one of the biggest chests in the world...
...
leverone ..mediorce chest ..
lee same
flex same
heath same...
all those arm guys...
coleman is a arm chest guy..back guy..
and that to me is what really big arms are about not massive arms ..with lacking chest and back with aids the illusion
ronnie best arms overalll period
not to mention having some of the biggest quads and hamstrings in the sports history.
-
Levrone had back width to match Colemans but without the superior detail. His arms are better and his chest leaves nothing to be desired to Coleman's sagging pecs. When he hit a most muscular he looked great but Levrone was no slouch in the chest department. Lee is another story.
-
no levrone didnt have better arms than coleman have u ever heard greatest arms in bb and levrone entered in the same sentence.. :-\
have u heard greatest arms and coleman in a sentence ;)
levrone had mediocre bis specially compare to his tris.... bi's are the arm showcace muscle..
when asked to flex in general how many people do you see doing a side tri shot
and how many would u see flexing their bi?
and please dont say levrones back was comparable to colemans in any way.... :-\
-
no levrone didnt have better arms than coleman have u ever heard greatest arms in bb and levrone entered in the same sentence.. :-\
have u heard greatest arms and coleman in a sentence ;)
levrone had mediocre bis specially compare to his tris.... bi's are the arm showcace muscle..
when asked to flex in general how many people do you see doing a side tri shot
and how many would u see flexing their bi?
and please dont say levrones back was comparable to colemans in any way.... :-\
agreed, Levrone was GREAT but nowhere near Ronnie at his best in terms of completeness, condition, size, thickness, i've seen shots of Levrone standing next to Ronnie in back shots where Kevin looked like a 13 year old girl next to Ronnie, Levrones arms were huge but had no bicep peak whatsoever.
-
Great post !
Lee's arms lack absolutely nothing he has it all his arms are simply outstanding .
well, they lack Ronnie's detail and vascularity for one.. ::)
-
LMAO. honestly.
its not close.
anyone can have big arms.
few have the refinement ronnie has.
Lee is not one of them:
-
For my money Ronnie was the most muscular human ever in his prime. If he didn't have weird abs there would be no debate on this.
are you retarded?
what does the amount of muscle he holds have to do with the shape of his abs?
stupid post of the day.
-
ronnie's arms also destroy lees when viewed from the back, a point completely overlooked by the nuthuggers.. ::)
-
Lee has better looking arms in gym shots in the offseason.
on contest day, its Ronnie all the way.
just look at the comparisons on this thread.
its obvious.
on contest day in dieted shape, its no contest:
-
i'm not saying that ronnie or priest has the best arms of all time.
but, someone who is labled as having the best arms of all time, should have arms impressive in every shot.
you cant say that about ronnie. (or lee).
-
Lee has better looking arms in gym shots in the offseason.
on contest day, its Ronnie all the way.
just look at the comparisons on this thread.
its obvious.
on contest day in dieted shape, its no contest:
you are also finding the best shots of ronnie you can find vs. any shots of priest.
typical.
post some recent shots of ronnie or from 00,01 olympia, 02, and then we'll see something else.
-
i'm not saying that ronnie or priest has the best arms of all time.
but, someone who is labled as having the best arms of all time, should have arms impressive in every shot.
you cant say that about ronnie. (or lee).
in great shape, Ronnies' arms are totally impressive from EVERY angle:
front, side, back, you name it.
Lee's arms lose A LOT of their impressiveness when viewed from the back.
-
LMAO. honestly.
its not close.
anyone can have big arms.
few have the refinement ronnie has.
Lee is not one of them:
You type empty words , seriously refinement Priests arms LACK NOTHING get this through your retarded head he had clearly better forearms & triceps he has equally impressive biceps albeit different he has better balance and proportion , he has striated triceps , outstanding separation and vascularity he lacks ZERO Ronnie is lacking Lee isn't
take Lee's advice ;)
Lee Priest GetBig Steptember 27 , 2007
PEFERCT ARMS..NAH YOU BETTER GOOGLE LEE PRIEST
-
you are also finding the best shots of ronnie you can find vs. any shots of priest.
typical.
post some recent shots of ronnie or from 00,01 olympia, 02, and then we'll see something else.
LOL so, you want me to post shots of Ronnie in poor shape just so that Lee will have a chance? ::)
the excuses have already begun, I see. ::)
-
You type empty words , seriously refinement Priests arms LACK NOTHING get this through your retarded head
they lack ronnie's refinement.
this has been proven over and over again.
hell, you guys want me to post out of shape Ronnie shots just so Lee's arms can stand up to them. LMAO... ::)
-
in great shape, Ronnies' arms are totally impressive from EVERY angle:
front, side, back, you name it.
Lee's arms lose A LOT of their impressiveness when viewed from the back.
lmfao you're such a loser fan-boy
Lee schooling Ronnie
-
LOL so, you want me to post shots of Ronnie in poor shape just so that Lee will have a chance? ::)
the excuses have already begun, I see. ::)
nope, just lee at his best vs. ronnie at his best.
something in over a year and 1500 pages, you still havent learned.
-
lmfao you're such a loser fan-boy
Lee schooling Ronnie
wow. 97 ronnie who lost to everyone..
yeah, his really close to his form later on.. ::)
-
they lack ronnie's refinement.
this has been proven over and over again.
hell, you guys want me to post out of shape Ronnie shots just so Lee's arms can stand up to them. LMAO... ::)
and ronnie lacks lee's balance.
do triceps and forearms not count?
-
wow. 97 ronnie who lost to everyone..
yeah, his really close to his form later on.. ::)
explain how ronnie's arms are different from 97 to any other year?
-
nope, just lee at his best vs. ronnie at his best.
something in over a year and 1500 pages, you still havent learned.
well excuse me for not being a Lee guru.
but unless lee at his best gains a ton of refinement, detail, vascularity and better delts, they will lag behind Ronnie's.
sorry.
-
they lack ronnie's refinement.
this has been proven over and over again.
hell, you guys want me to post out of shape Ronnie shots just so Lee's arms can stand up to them. LMAO... ::)
Do you call tying the same word over and over as proof? not it most certainly has not been proven you don't even know what the word means ' refinement ' give me a break stop repeating what you read in MD lets entertain your bullshit lets say he does lack ' refinement ' he still has hell of a lot better triceps & forearms and proportion in relation to each other your theory Ronnie has better arms is addressed , corrected and dismissed .
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=180004.0;attach=210955;image)
wtf is this?
why is this picture so dark and ronnie's complexion so much darker in this picture than any other picture from his entire fucking career?
-
and ronnie lacks lee's balance.
do triceps and forearms not count?
Great post ! lol NO they don't count in Hulkster's book all that counts is Ronnie's biceps lol
-
well excuse me for not being a Lee guru.
but unless lee at his best gains a ton of refinement, detail, vascularity and better delts, they will lag behind Ronnie's.
sorry.
vascularity?
you are truly pathetic and proved wrong in every post.
every post.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=180004.0;attach=210889;image)
-
explain how ronnie's arms are different from 97 to any other year?
are you an idiot?:
::)
97 ronnie vs 99 ronnie vs 2001 AC Ronnie:
::)
better detail, better refinment right here:
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=180004.0;attach=210955;image)
wtf is this?
why is this picture so dark and ronnie's complexion so much darker in this picture than any other picture from his entire fucking career?
Oh thats the two disc special edition of the 1999 Mr Olympia lol
-
are you an idiot?:
::)
97 ronnie vs 99 ronnie vs 2001 AC Ronnie:
::)
better detail, better refinment right here:
Stop using the word refinement , explain what refinement means , lets hear this gem lol
-
vascularity?
you are truly pathetic and proved wrong in every post.
every post.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=180004.0;attach=210889;image)
lol show me some vascularity from any other angle, or even in, god forbid, a MANDATORY pose ::) dumbass..
oh. and by the way, Ronnie can match lee in underarm vascularity too.
I'll find some shots later on..
-
are you an idiot?:
::)
97 ronnie vs 99 ronnie vs 2001 AC Ronnie:
::)
better detail, better refinment right here:
in the arms?
if so, not by much.
ronnie's arms (and his calves) didnt really change than much from those years.
before 98, he was known for his arms.
-
Stop using the word refinement , explain what refinement means , lets hear this gem lol
you need the whole fucking english language explained to you.. ::)
have you taken your english classes yet? ::)
-
lol show me some vascularity from any other angle, or even in, god forbid, a MANDATORY pose ::) dumbass..
oh. and by the way, Ronnie can match lee in underarm vascularity too.
I'll find some shots later on..
hahahaha, here's were they come up with the famous morphed MD cover shots, hahahaha, Blechman has someone on the payroll who does that as their only job.
-
lol show me some vascularity from any other angle, or even in, god forbid, a MANDATORY pose ::) dumbass..
oh. and by the way, Ronnie can match lee in underarm vascularity too.
I'll find some shots later on..
Ronnie doesn't compare to this , sorry Fan-boys
-
you need the whole fucking english language explained to you.. ::)
have you taken your english classes yet? ::)
Keep avoiding the question , keep running boy ;)
-
hahahaha, here's were they come up with the famous morphed MD cover shots, hahahaha, Blechman has someone on the payroll who does that as their only job.
None of these are MD covers ;)
-
:o
-
lol show me some vascularity from any other angle, or even in, god forbid, a MANDATORY pose ::) dumbass..
oh. and by the way, Ronnie can match lee in underarm vascularity too.
I'll find some shots later on..
so me a shot where ronnie's arms can look as impressive as lee' in the overhead shot.
since you claim ronnie has the best ever, it should be easy.
(by the way, sergio was not a midget, so its not soley based on height).
-
is anyone on this board owned as much as huckster is?
;D
-
so me a shot where ronnie's arms can look as impressive as lee' in the overhead shot.
since you claim ronnie has the best ever, it should be easy.
(by the way, sergio was not a midget, so its not soley based on height).
hahahahaha, i can't believe you think Lee's arm looks good in that overhead shot, the OUTSIDE of his forearm alone is almost bigger than his whole upper arm.
-
hahahahaha, i can't believe you think Lee's arm looks good in that overhead shot, the OUTSIDE of his forearm alone is almost bigger than his whole upper arm.
Could be worse ;)
-
is anyone on this board owned as much as huckster is?
;D
Maybe just maybe ...................pumps ter lol
-
so me a shot where ronnie's arms can look as impressive as lee' in the overhead shot.
since you claim ronnie has the best ever, it should be easy.
(by the way, sergio was not a midget, so its not soley based on height).
if Lee's arms are better than Ronnie's, then why do they NOT look as good from the front, side (as in side chest or mm) or back shots?
Lee's arms look better from the side tri, and thats about it.
not much, really.
-
if Lee's arms are better than Ronnie's, then why do they NOT look as good from the front, side (as in side chest or mm) or back shots?
Lee's arms look better from the side tri, and thats about it.
not much, really.
They don't look good according to who? you lol you think how Ronnie looks is how everyone else should look thats not how it works kid , his arms are lacking NOTHING Ronnie's is its that simple .
Lee Priest GetBig Steptember 27 , 2007
PEFERCT ARMS..NAH YOU BETTER GOOGLE LEE PRIEST
-
why the fuck are you bringing your useless quotes into this? ::)
is desperation setting in yet again because reality does not agree with you just like in the truce thread? ::)
-
They don't look good according to who? you lol
I never said they don't look good.
they look great.
but we are talking about how they look RELATIVE TO PEAK RONNIE.
listen, I know you struggle with basic english, but try and learn this distinction.
it might help you a lot.
-
why the fuck are you bringing your useless quotes into this? ::)
is desperation setting in yet again because reality does not agree with you just like in the truce thread? ::)
Typical Hulkster keep running from what you mean by ' refinement ' ;) and again the reality of the situation is Ronnie does NOT have better triceps or better forearms , he doesn't have better proportion between the muscles , he's lacking another typical Hulkster move is ignore the obvious fixation on the mundane and hope everyone agrees it changes ZERO
Lee has more complete arms with much better forearms and triceps you can't counter this...ever hear that before? ;)
-
None of these are MD covers ;)
neither is this 8)
-
I never said they don't look good.
they look great.
but we are talking about how they look RELATIVE TO PEAK RONNIE.
listen, I know you struggle with basic english, but try and learn this distinction.
it might help you a lot.
lol peak Ronnie no you said they DON'T look as good from all angles nice try kid and FYI MORON its English not english heed your own advice
-
neither is this 8)
You can always count on Hulkster posting most musculars lol
-
You can always count on Hulkster posting most musculars lol
you can always count on ND and Icecold to try and put down any pose that shows just how amazing ronnie's arms or upper body really was.. lol
-
you can always count on ND and Icecold to try and put down any pose that shows just how amazing ronnie's arms or upper body really was.. lol
English mother-fucker do you speak it? lol I never said his arms weren't great they are just NOT as great as Lee Priest . ;)
-
you can always count on ND and Icecold to try and put down any pose that shows just how amazing ronnie's arms or upper body really was.. lol
just be objective.
your nuthugging is well known and super pathetic.
-
just be objective.
your nuthugging is well known and super pathetic.
he can't be objective , he's delusional
" Lee has better triceps "
Ronnie has better refinement
" Lee has better forearms "
Ronnie has the edge in refinement
" Lee can match Ronnie in vascualrity and separation "
Ronnie's refinement is better ( posts most muscular )
old news the kid is ignorant and helpless
-
just be objective.
your nuthugging is well known and super pathetic.
so is you and ND's ronnie bashing.
-
so is you and ND's ronnie bashing.
Don't mistake thinking Lee has better arms as ' bashing ' its NOT sorry I'm not posting pictures of petrified dog shit and comparing them to Yates , I'm above that nonsense , I've always given Ronnie credit 1996-2001 past that he looks like garbage in my opinion , opps looks like someone is owned again.
-
so is you and ND's ronnie bashing.
not at all.
i have and always will note ronnie's greatness.
but you are completely blind and wont even acknowledge anything else.
even it comes from ronnie - like his comments about dorian.
-
not at all.
i have and always will note ronnie's greatness.
but you are completely blind and wont even acknowledge anything else.
even it comes from ronnie - like his comments about dorian.
Great post , Ronnie give praise he's being humble or worse Hulkster says he's wrong lol the kid is a loser and he's not that bright .
Ronnie Coleman 1996-2001 outstanding physique post that all down hill
-
Coleman looking like rubbish, LOL
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=180004.0;attach=210965;image)
-
Coleman looking like rubbish, LOL
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=180004.0;attach=210965;image)
And what year is that from?
-
And what year is that from?
99. here is a clear, non blurry shot, with good resolution (unlike the peice of shit posted by ND) ::)
and he looks fantastic:
-
99. here is a clear, non blurry shot, with good resolution (unlike the peice of shit posted by ND) ::)
and he looks fantastic:
At first glance I thought "England_1" was posting an old pic of Ronnie...but the fact that it was a 99 shot that was purposely blurred shows the attempted deception was still there :)
-
At first glance I thought "England_1" was posting an old pic of Ronnie...but the fact that it was a 99 shot that was purposely blurred shows the attempted deception was still there :)
people like ND and Icecold will do anything to make 99 Ronnie seem bad. Including willfull deception. ::)
when in reality, he was unbeatable to date.
-
Don't mistake thinking Lee has better arms as ' bashing ' its NOT sorry I'm not posting pictures of petrified dog shit and comparing them to Yates , I'm above that nonsense , I've always given Ronnie credit 1996-2001 past that he looks like garbage in my opinion , opps looks like someone is owned again.
He jumped on me on another thread like a rabid dog, for absolutely no reason. Desperate for attention.
-
I'll say this. Flex had better arms than both of them. When he does a arm shot, the Bi and Tri make a perfect circle. Especially evident back in 1992 and 1993. His Hardbody vid is mind boggling in that respect.... I've never seen anybody whose bis and tris match up perfectly.
That being said, every bodybuilder has a weak bodypart. With Lee Priest, it's his chest, and his huge arms bring attention to that. Ronnie it could be calves, or a lack of exceptional tricep definition. With Flex, it was lack of width and chest.
-
I'll say this. Flex had better arms than both of them. When he does a arm shot, the Bi and Tri make a perfect circle. Especially evident back in 1992 and 1993. His Hardbody vid is mind boggling in that respect.... I've never seen anybody whose bis and tris match up perfectly.
That being said, every bodybuilder has a weak bodypart. With Lee Priest, it's his chest, and his huge arms bring attention to that. Ronnie it could be calves, or a lack of exceptional tricep definition. With Flex, it was lack of width and chest.
agreed.
before flex when crazy with the oil, his arms were huge, shapely, and ripped.
from every angle - unlike ronnie.
-
people like ND and Icecold will do anything to make 99 Ronnie seem bad. Including willfull deception. ::)
when in reality, he was unbeatable to date.
In contrast, no one has to blur Dorian's pics to prove any points. His poses themselves do the talking lol.
-
people like ND and Icecold will do anything to make 99 Ronnie seem bad. Including willfull deception. ::)
when in reality, he was unbeatable to date.
You're full of shit kid , that was taken off YouTube FYI so stop trying to act like you figured something out , you're the moron who made up quotes from Shawn Ray and when exposed for the liar you are you became very quiet as usual
-
He jumped on me on another thread like a rabid dog, for absolutely no reason. Desperate for attention.
I ' jumped ' on you because you made a baseless claim without knowing the facts and as usual I corrected you , now the BowFlex threads I did jump in those thats are classics lol ;)
-
99. here is a clear, non blurry shot, with good resolution (unlike the peice of shit posted by ND) ::)
and he looks fantastic:
Again which is the real Ronnie ? you guys keep posting the ' right ' versions I think 4 times now so who's up to ' willful deception'? ;)