Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman training biceps (Read 20546 times)

Cap · « **Reply #125 on:** November 11, 2007, 02:30:23 PM »

What's ironic to me about a number of BBers in the current era is that they built their legs up at the expense of their calves, but that is ignored. In the current era developing small bodyparts is not important, something that Lee Priest has done in all aspects (you could knock him on chest I guess). To me, a guy's bone length is irrelevant because he cannot change that and he built up some crazy arms.

Why is it that in a time where guys can put on muscle easier that they neglect easy muscle groups? At least in Arnold's era his forearms and thighs weren't enormous but he was more balanced than Coleman.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #126 on:** November 11, 2007, 02:36:34 PM »

Quote from: pumpster on November 11, 2007, 02:27:31 PM

Since his arms are clearly too short for the torso, really who cares what you say LOL

Absolutely no striations or detail anywhere on those upper arms in this shot.

Again Coleman's arms are to long for his torso but you'll gloss right over that

each one of his arm muscles are proportionate to each other you CAN NOT find that in Ronnie or Arnold on top of having world class biceps , Lee has world class triceps and forearms its not open for discussion any ' defect ' you attempt to find is render moot Lee has much better ARMS ( key word ) than Coleman or Schwarzenegger

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #127 on:** November 11, 2007, 02:39:33 PM »

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #128 on:** November 11, 2007, 02:42:40 PM »

Ronnie has the best arms with forearms like this lmfao sure you're right

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #129 on:** November 11, 2007, 04:03:19 PM »

some are such bodybuilding followers but have no clue.... whatsoever
...
lee preisets have =great arms no doubt but the reason.. lee..heath and to some degree flex... and levrone arms will look soo amazing is.... due to othe lacking bodyparts.. mainly chest.... none of the guys have great chests.. or big huge backs like coleman....so their arms look extra amazing due to not so amazing lackin bodyparts..
ronnie has big everything that what makes him the greatest...
levrone had great tris thats it.. tris too big for bi's that had non existent peak.
greatest arms..
ronnie

The Squadfather · « **Reply #130 on:** November 11, 2007, 04:05:10 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on November 11, 2007, 04:03:19 PM

some are such bodybuilding followers but have no clue.... whatsoever
...
lee preisets have =great arms no doubt but the reason.. lee..heath and to some degree flex... and levrone arms will look soo amazing is.... due to othe lacking bodyparts.. mainly chest.... none of the guys have great chests.. or big huge backs like coleman....so their arms look extra amazing due to not so amazing lackin bodyparts..
ronnie has big everything that what makes him the greatest...
levrone had great tris thats it.. tris too big for bi's that had non existent peak.
greatest arms..
ronnie

exactly, Ronnie is simply mind boggling.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #131 on:** November 11, 2007, 04:11:33 PM »

yes that picture is freaky
..all while having the biggest back and one of the biggest chests in the world...
...
leverone ..mediorce chest ..
lee same
flex same
heath same...
all those arm guys...
coleman is a arm chest guy..back guy..
and that to me is what really big arms are about not massive arms ..with lacking chest and back with aids the illusion
ronnie best arms overalll period

The Squadfather · « **Reply #132 on:** November 11, 2007, 04:15:26 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on November 11, 2007, 04:11:33 PM

yes that picture is freaky
..all while having the biggest back and one of the biggest chests in the world...
...
leverone ..mediorce chest ..
lee same
flex same
heath same...
all those arm guys...
coleman is a arm chest guy..back guy..
and that to me is what really big arms are about not massive arms ..with lacking chest and back with aids the illusion
ronnie best arms overalll period

not to mention having some of the biggest quads and hamstrings in the sports history.

Cap · « **Reply #133 on:** November 11, 2007, 04:28:14 PM »

Levrone had back width to match Colemans but without the superior detail. His arms are better and his chest leaves nothing to be desired to Coleman's sagging pecs. When he hit a most muscular he looked great but Levrone was no slouch in the chest department. Lee is another story.

mesmorph78 · « **Reply #134 on:** November 11, 2007, 04:32:18 PM »

no levrone didnt have better arms than coleman have u ever heard greatest arms in bb and levrone entered in the same sentence.. $:-\$
have u heard greatest arms and coleman in a sentence

levrone had mediocre bis specially compare to his tris.... bi's are the arm showcace muscle..
when asked to flex in general how many people do you see doing a side tri shot
and how many would u see flexing their bi?
and please dont say levrones back was comparable to colemans in any way.... $:-\$

The Squadfather · « **Reply #135 on:** November 11, 2007, 04:35:00 PM »

Quote from: mesmorph78 on November 11, 2007, 04:32:18 PM

no levrone didnt have better arms than coleman have u ever heard greatest arms in bb and levrone entered in the same sentence.. $:-\$
have u heard greatest arms and coleman in a sentence
levrone had mediocre bis specially compare to his tris.... bi's are the arm showcace muscle..
when asked to flex in general how many people do you see doing a side tri shot
and how many would u see flexing their bi?
and please dont say levrones back was comparable to colemans in any way.... $:-\$

agreed, Levrone was GREAT but nowhere near Ronnie at his best in terms of completeness, condition, size, thickness, i've seen shots of Levrone standing next to Ronnie in back shots where Kevin looked like a 13 year old girl next to Ronnie, Levrones arms were huge but had no bicep peak whatsoever.

Hulkster · « **Reply #136 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:36:00 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 11, 2007, 01:56:01 PM

Great post !

Lee's arms lack absolutely nothing he has it all his arms are simply outstanding .

well, they lack Ronnie's detail and vascularity for one..

Hulkster · « **Reply #137 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:40:14 PM »

LMAO. honestly.

its not close.

anyone can have big arms.

few have the refinement ronnie has.

Lee is not one of them:

no one · « **Reply #138 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:43:29 PM »

Quote from: Groink on November 09, 2007, 06:28:54 PM

For my money Ronnie was the most muscular human ever in his prime. If he didn't have weird abs there would be no debate on this.

are you retarded?

what does the amount of muscle he holds have to do with the shape of his abs?

stupid post of the day.

Hulkster · « **Reply #139 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:43:42 PM »

ronnie's arms also destroy lees when viewed from the back, a point completely overlooked by the nuthuggers..

Hulkster · « **Reply #140 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:46:51 PM »

Lee has better looking arms in gym shots in the offseason.

on contest day, its Ronnie all the way.

just look at the comparisons on this thread.

its obvious.

on contest day in dieted shape, its no contest:

IceCold · « **Reply #141 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:48:01 PM »

i'm not saying that ronnie or priest has the best arms of all time.

but, someone who is labled as having the best arms of all time, should have arms impressive in every shot.

you cant say that about ronnie. (or lee).

IceCold · « **Reply #142 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:50:10 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 11, 2007, 05:46:51 PM

Lee has better looking arms in gym shots in the offseason.

on contest day, its Ronnie all the way.

just look at the comparisons on this thread.

its obvious.

on contest day in dieted shape, its no contest:

you are also finding the best shots of ronnie you can find vs. any shots of priest.

typical.

post some recent shots of ronnie or from 00,01 olympia, 02, and then we'll see something else.

Hulkster · « **Reply #143 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:51:46 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on November 11, 2007, 05:48:01 PM

i'm not saying that ronnie or priest has the best arms of all time.

but, someone who is labled as having the best arms of all time, should have arms impressive in every shot.

you cant say that about ronnie. (or lee).

in great shape, Ronnies' arms are totally impressive from EVERY angle:

front, side, back, you name it.

Lee's arms lose A LOT of their impressiveness when viewed from the back.

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #144 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:52:30 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 11, 2007, 05:40:14 PM

LMAO. honestly.

its not close.

anyone can have big arms.

few have the refinement ronnie has.

Lee is not one of them:

You type empty words , seriously refinement Priests arms LACK NOTHING get this through your retarded head he had clearly better forearms & triceps he has equally impressive biceps albeit different he has better balance and proportion , he has striated triceps , outstanding separation and vascularity he lacks ZERO Ronnie is lacking Lee isn't

take Lee's advice

Lee Priest GetBig Steptember 27 , 2007

PEFERCT ARMS..NAH YOU BETTER GOOGLE LEE PRIEST

Hulkster · « **Reply #145 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:52:58 PM »

Quote from: IceCold on November 11, 2007, 05:50:10 PM

you are also finding the best shots of ronnie you can find vs. any shots of priest.

typical.

post some recent shots of ronnie or from 00,01 olympia, 02, and then we'll see something else.

LOL so, you want me to post shots of Ronnie in poor shape just so that Lee will have a chance?

the excuses have already begun, I see.

Hulkster · « **Reply #146 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:54:32 PM »

Quote

You type empty words , seriously refinement Priests arms LACK NOTHING get this through your retarded head

they lack ronnie's refinement.

this has been proven over and over again.

hell, you guys want me to post out of shape Ronnie shots just so Lee's arms can stand up to them. LMAO...

NarcissisticDeity · « **Reply #147 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:54:49 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 11, 2007, 05:51:46 PM

in great shape, Ronnies' arms are totally impressive from EVERY angle:

front, side, back, you name it.

Lee's arms lose A LOT of their impressiveness when viewed from the back.

lmfao you're such a loser fan-boy

Lee schooling Ronnie

IceCold · « **Reply #148 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:54:55 PM »

Quote from: Hulkster on November 11, 2007, 05:52:58 PM

LOL so, you want me to post shots of Ronnie in poor shape just so that Lee will have a chance?

the excuses have already begun, I see.

nope, just lee at his best vs. ronnie at his best.

something in over a year and 1500 pages, you still havent learned.

Hulkster · « **Reply #149 on:** November 11, 2007, 05:55:31 PM »

Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on November 11, 2007, 05:54:49 PM

lmfao you're such a loser fan-boy

Lee schooling Ronnie

wow. 97 ronnie who lost to everyone..

yeah, his really close to his form later on..