Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman training biceps  (Read 20551 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #100 on: November 11, 2007, 10:16:58 AM »
You get it , these ignorant fucks think Ronnie had the best side tri ever and his side chest was on par with Arnold  ::) Ronnie never looked that great from the side as he did in the front or back poses

quotes for any of this please, you lying idiot..
 >:(

 ::)
Flower Boy Ran Away

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #101 on: November 11, 2007, 10:21:35 AM »
oil?   ::)


ronnie's calves have looked just as crappy throughout his whole career, save for a tiny size increase, while the rest of him grew by leaps and bounds.

there is no idication of oil what so ever.
There is something funky going on with his calf size increase.  Definitely weird looking.
Squishy face retard

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #102 on: November 11, 2007, 10:24:49 AM »
lee priest has the best arms of this time period....bi's, tri's and forearms are all topnotch....ronnie was very, very, very good in his prime as far as arms go but he DIDN'T have the best tri's, his bi's were great and his arms were very defined but tri's were not his strongpoint.

*I "think" the forearm pic is Priest....if not sorry but I'm pretty sure it is and it's pretty damn :o :o :o

again, all the shots of lee's arms are never onstage.

they always seem to be in offseason shape - ie usually much thicker than in contest shape.

onstage, his arms looked soft compared to Ronnie's:

this is my biggest beef with saying he has the best arms of the period.

he has AMAZING arms, but Ronnie's detail and refinement set him apart from all the rest. IMO.

Flower Boy Ran Away

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22972
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #103 on: November 11, 2007, 10:25:54 AM »
There is something funky going on with his calf size increase.  Definitely weird looking.

size increase?

his calves have looked pretty much the same for years now.

his genetics, like the genetic predispositon for his abs, sucks big time.
Flower Boy Ran Away

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #104 on: November 11, 2007, 10:28:35 AM »
Not on par with Arnold? When will people accpet that arnolds side chest isnt really that good. Yes his titanic pecs and huge rib cage look impressive but the pose isnt judged solely on that. From the waist downwards he doesnt impress and factor in lack of tri sweep and relatively poor delts esp. rear and your left with a pose when viewed against others is average.


Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #105 on: November 11, 2007, 10:32:12 AM »
size increase?

his calves have looked pretty much the same for years now.

his genetics, like the genetic predispositon for his abs, sucks big time.
His calves changed size and those pics have been shown before.

Not on par with Arnold? When will people accpet that arnolds side chest isnt really that good. Yes his titanic pecs and huge rib cage look impressive but the pose isnt judged solely on that. From the waist downwards he doesnt impress and factor in lack of tri sweep and relatively poor delts esp. rear and your left with a pose when viewed against others is average.
You're a moron.  He epitomized that pose.  He actually holds in his waist and yes it is based on your chest.  Ronnie turns it into a bicep and front delt pose.  Legs were not a big deal in Arnold's time but he still had good thighs considering.
Squishy face retard

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #106 on: November 11, 2007, 10:41:54 AM »
You're a moron.  He epitomized that pose.  He actually holds in his waist and yes it is based on your chest.  Ronnie turns it into a bicep and front delt pose.  Legs were not a big deal in Arnold's time but he still had good thighs considering.

Moron? Why? Because i  expressed my opinion. Your'e correct, the pose is based on your chest but having the best chest doesnt guarantee you win the pose.  A front double bicep isnt based purely on the bis. 

Ronnie hasnt turned it into a bicep pose at all. He, just like otheres performs it differently to older bbers.

Levrone doesnt have the best of chests but its hard to argue he doesnt have the best side chest pose.


natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #107 on: November 11, 2007, 10:44:46 AM »
again, all the shots of lee's arms are never onstage.

they always seem to be in offseason shape - ie usually much thicker than in contest shape.

onstage, his arms looked soft compared to Ronnie's:

this is my biggest beef with saying he has the best arms of the period.

he has AMAZING arms, but Ronnie's detail and refinement set him apart from all the rest. IMO.



hulkster, you worry me.  Honestly....do you see a doctor cause you're obsession with Ronnie is just plain old wierd.  You can't seem to admit that anyone beats ronnie on anything....dont' you find that odd?  do you honestly worship a guy this much or is it an act?  you seem like yoiu HAVE to show those 99 screen shots every chance you get.........strange, strange, strange. 
nasser=piece of shit

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #108 on: November 11, 2007, 11:26:30 AM »
hulkster, you worry me.  Honestly....do you see a doctor cause you're obsession with Ronnie is just plain old wierd.  You can't seem to admit that anyone beats ronnie on anything....dont' you find that odd?  do you honestly worship a guy this much or is it an act?  you seem like yoiu HAVE to show those 99 screen shots every chance you get.........strange, strange, strange. 

Um, most BB authorities consider Coleman the best all-time.

Priest did *not* have Coleman's detail, biceps peak or flow, given the stubiness factor.

To repeat, Coleman had good tris, huge.

natural al

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6309
  • like it or don't, learn to live with it..whooooooo
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #109 on: November 11, 2007, 11:43:43 AM »
Um, most BB authorities consider Coleman the best all-time.

Priest did *not* have Coleman's detail, biceps peak or flow, given the stubiness factor.

To repeat, Coleman had good tris, huge.

even if he is the best alltime that doesn't mean he has the best individual bodyparts off alltime, his overall package was great but that doesn't mean everypart of that package beats everone else's.  Ronnie had good shoulders but they can't touch Levrone's for example, Ronnies abs can't touch John Hnatyshack's-sp-abs but ronnie is alot better BB. 
nasser=piece of shit

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #110 on: November 11, 2007, 12:55:45 PM »
Moron? Why? Because i  expressed my opinion. Your'e correct, the pose is based on your chest but having the best chest doesnt guarantee you win the pose.  A front double bicep isnt based purely on the bis. 

Ronnie hasnt turned it into a bicep pose at all. He, just like otheres performs it differently to older bbers.

Levrone doesnt have the best of chests but its hard to argue he doesnt have the best side chest pose.


Ronnie turned the side chest into a bicep and front delt pose because 1.) he can't pose for shit, 2.) it hides his gut.

As for Lee P, his short arms do not change the fact that his total arm package was better than Coleman's.  If bicep peak was an extremely important criteria then Scott, Oliva, and Levrone have shitty arms which I disagree with.  If we compare every Lee P bicep picture to a perfect lighting shot of 1999 then everybody's arms suck, which is also untrue.
Squishy face retard

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #111 on: November 11, 2007, 01:14:17 PM »
you may have that mag but you don't have other key ones from the period, like the M and F with the 99 Olympia coverage, or the Ironman with the 99 olympia coverage.

and be glad you don't: they would own your ass even more in the truce thread.


so this is how you react are getting severly owned.

i dont have the ironman, but i do have the muscle and fitness olympia coverage from 99.

give me a week or so to get it and i will post whatever you want from it.

and like i said earlier, you will be and are owned in every post.

this will be just another chance to prove you wrong.

againg.
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #112 on: November 11, 2007, 01:16:54 PM »
hukster,

do you see al and cap owning your pathetic ass?


but, you'll claim that EVERYONE on this thread is talking about how great ronnie's triceps are, when in reality its just you and bowflex/dumpster.

do a fucking count if you dont think so.

you are the worst notorious guy on this board - just like glenrrr from mayhem.

congrats.


hahahaha.
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #113 on: November 11, 2007, 01:27:15 PM »
even if he is the best alltime that doesn't mean he has the best individual bodyparts off alltime, his overall package was great but that doesn't mean everypart of that package beats everone else's.  Ronnie had good shoulders but they can't touch Levrone's for example, Ronnies abs can't touch John Hnatyshack's-sp-abs but ronnie is alot better BB. 


these clowns think that ronnie has the best everything - except the obvious oil filled calves and worst midsection of any top bber of all time.

they even think ronnie has better legs than platz.


 ::)


(do a search for the thread and you'll see the same exact thing - huckster posting pics of ronnie from 99, dumpster/bowflex agrees, and then huckster thinks the entire thread/board agrees with him.

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #114 on: November 11, 2007, 01:28:18 PM »

To repeat, Coleman had good tris, huge.


sure thing, there, bill.




(ps, arent triceps suppossed to have 3 heads.)

lol.
R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83656
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #115 on: November 11, 2007, 01:36:08 PM »
quotes for any of this please, you lying idiot..
 >:(

 ::)

You're the fucking idiot who claimed Ronnie has better calves than Dorian and better quads than Platz lol and you're the liar who created quotes that I exposed you on  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83656
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #116 on: November 11, 2007, 01:38:46 PM »
hulkster, you worry me.  Honestly....do you see a doctor cause you're obsession with Ronnie is just plain old wierd.  You can't seem to admit that anyone beats ronnie on anything....dont' you find that odd?  do you honestly worship a guy this much or is it an act?  you seem like yoiu HAVE to show those 99 screen shots every chance you get.........strange, strange, strange. 

Great post ! lol


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83656
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #117 on: November 11, 2007, 01:43:31 PM »
again, all the shots of lee's arms are never onstage.

they always seem to be in offseason shape - ie usually much thicker than in contest shape.

onstage, his arms looked soft compared to Ronnie's:

this is my biggest beef with saying he has the best arms of the period.

he has AMAZING arms, but Ronnie's detail and refinement set him apart from all the rest. IMO.




LMFAO soft you're delusional period. Priest's arms are the yardstick in which perfect arms are measured by , forearms , triceps and biceps all in harmony with each other , great separation , detail and vascularity he lacks NOTHING Ronnie is lacking in forearms & triceps its a NO BRIANER

IceCold

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Getbig!
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #118 on: November 11, 2007, 01:44:06 PM »
again, all the shots of lee's arms are never onstage.

they always seem to be in offseason shape - ie usually much thicker than in contest shape.

onstage, his arms looked soft compared to Ronnie's:

this is my biggest beef with saying he has the best arms of the period.

he has AMAZING arms, but Ronnie's detail and refinement set him apart from all the rest. IMO.




ronnie's arms have never looked like this.

and in case you were going to make up some more shit, this is an onstage/contest shot.

ronnie's arms to a very few, may look better than lee's in the mm, but not close in EVERY other shot.

why do you think the most muscular is the deciding factor for all in bbing?

talk about someone who needs a clue.

R.I.P. DIMEBAG DARRELL ABBOTT (1966-2004)

Cap

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6363
  • Trueprotein.com 5% discount code= CSP111
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #119 on: November 11, 2007, 01:48:03 PM »
When you see Lee P hit a tricep shot, you really have seen what a tricep should look like.  FOREARMS are present and triceps are huge, hard and ripped.  Lee is never lacking in arm vascularity and his biceps are big and hard.  To critique a guy for bone length is really reaching.
Squishy face retard

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83656
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #120 on: November 11, 2007, 01:53:25 PM »

ronnie's arms have never looked like this.

and in case you were going to make up some more shit, this is an onstage/contest shot.

ronnie's arms to a very few, may look better than lee's in the mm, but not close in EVERY other shot.

why do you think the most muscular is the deciding factor for all in bbing?

talk about someone who needs a clue.



Thats because he doesn't know how bodybuilding contests are judged , he's ignorant I mean you've exposed him on this dozens of times as well as me and others he's hopeless .

Great post as usual .

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83656
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #121 on: November 11, 2007, 01:56:01 PM »
When you see Lee P hit a tricep shot, you really have seen what a tricep should look like.  FOREARMS are present and triceps are huge, hard and ripped.  Lee is never lacking in arm vascularity and his biceps are big and hard.  To critique a guy for bone length is really reaching.

Great post !

Lee's arms lack absolutely nothing he has it all his arms are simply outstanding .

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #122 on: November 11, 2007, 02:15:53 PM »
To critique a guy for bone length is really reaching.

Not at all; his arms are too short for his torso, effecting his balance. Everyone i thought knew this.

Great forearms but realistically forearms aren't a prerequisite for great arms and aren't worth as much. Schwarzenegger & Coleman with arguably the best ever arms and pretty much the same attributes including mediocre forearms proved that.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83656
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #123 on: November 11, 2007, 02:18:51 PM »
Not at all; his arms are too short for his torso, effecting his balance. Everyone i thought knew this.

Great forearms but realistically forearms aren't a prerequisite for great arms and aren't worth as much. Schwarzenegger & Coleman with arguably the best ever arms and pretty much the same attributes including mediocre forearms proved that.

Monster irony Ronnie has arms to long for his torso but thats just fine  ::) typical hypocritical fan-boy Arnold or Ronnie don't have the best arms ever , they both lag behind Priest in triceps/forearms not to mention proportion in relation to each other what other excuses are you working on? because this one besides being wrong is dumb.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Ronnie Coleman training biceps
« Reply #124 on: November 11, 2007, 02:27:31 PM »
Monster irony Ronnie has arms to long for his torso but thats just fine  ::) typical hypocritical fan-boy Arnold or Ronnie don't have the best arms ever , they both lag behind Priest in triceps/forearms not to mention proportion in relation to each other what other excuses are you working on? because this one besides being wrong is dumb.

Since his arms are clearly too short for the torso, really who cares what you say LOL

Absolutely no striations or detail anywhere on those upper arms in this shot.