Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 08:24:30 AM

Title: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 08:24:30 AM
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.

2-Sevestase: Was on sustanon for 3 years straight and cycled d-bol and anadrol during that time, maxing out at 170 lbs at 15% bodyfat.

3- Billyguns: no need to explain his track record.


I vote for Harris as not only did he mega dose but he was so dedicated to his diet he would wake up twice a night to refuel with protien.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Blockhead on February 05, 2008, 08:27:04 AM

 King Kamali...aka 'nder98'.

 Billy Gunns doesn't count because it is obvious that the gang in NYC area sold him sterile seasme oil so technically he's never used real gear.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 08:29:02 AM
Yah, knowing who Billyguns' supplier was, he was probably swallowing sugar pills and shooting vegetible oil.


Your right, Kamali should also be nominated, years and years of megadosing and having 17 inch arms after synthol.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: G o a t b o y on February 05, 2008, 08:30:45 AM
Sevastase is clearly the winner if he maxed at 170#, 15%.

Billy wasn't on for that long and had no natural base, so although he looks like shit, he doesn't get the title.

Harris' history is pathetic, and he should be shot for stupidity for doing it as he did, but he looks better that either Sevastase or Billy.




Chances are, Sev has been getting fakes all this time over there in Romania..  hell, you could be 170# 15% without even lifting weights, forget gear.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: cht868 on February 05, 2008, 08:33:24 AM
cause sevestee is on a high protein cum diet, he seems like he sucks a lot of dick and relies on cum as his main protein source ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: mesmorph78 on February 05, 2008, 08:52:35 AM
kamali..
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Stark on February 05, 2008, 08:54:13 AM
Ron Harris, by miles, the guy is a fucking disgrace but is the absolute pictureboy for so many
Bodybuilding gym rats on this planet.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Karl Kox on February 05, 2008, 09:37:38 AM
Any bbder with a big waist line.  I see guys all the time who look massive on gear, but they are just big, they don't have A pleasing physique
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Pazuzu on February 05, 2008, 11:01:46 AM
I vote for me - I have seen 15-year-old anorexic girls with more mass than me. Ants have more mass!

Epic self-owning (did I say that right?)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 05, 2008, 11:06:31 AM
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.

2-Sevestase: Was on sustanon for 3 years straight and cycled d-bol and anadrol during that time, maxing out at 170 lbs at 15% bodyfat.

3- Billyguns: no need to explain his track record.


I vote for Harris as not only did he mega dose but he was so dedicated to his diet he would wake up twice a night to refuel with protien.


2 is the winner.

P.S. love the nickname!
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Pazuzu on February 05, 2008, 11:12:50 AM
NPC officials even felt so bad for me that even though I weighed in at only 121 pounds at 6-4, they allowed me to compete as a Heavyweight on several occasions. The judges felt so bad that for me I took second place at the New England twice as a HW, and twice at the Massachusetts State too.

And this was with 1,000 mg of Sustanon every hour, 50 tabs of d-bol and Winstrol a day, and 500 mg. of Deca every day.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Stavios on February 05, 2008, 11:16:13 AM
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.

I must not even look like an average guy then because Ron owns me physique wise  :'(
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: SirTraps on February 05, 2008, 11:20:32 AM


          Id have to give it to this puny shrimp.  Talk about shitty genetics  ::)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Go 4 It on February 05, 2008, 11:22:08 AM
I must not even look like an average guy then because Ron owns me physique wise  :'(

You can always buy more skin tight Under Armor gear then him, thats something you still have a chance at beating him at..
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: columbusdude82 on February 05, 2008, 11:23:32 AM
I vote for me - I have seen 15-year-old anorexic girls with more mass than me. Ants have more mass!

Epic self-owning (did I say that right?)

Shouldn't you be ghost-writing some pro's MD advice column right about now, instead of wasting time on message boards? ::)

Oh, and as for worst genetics, I know this kid who may not be the very worst but his genetics are damn lousy!!! Says he's been on 750 mg test a week (from some shady UG lab) since JULY 2005!!!!!!! and is 180 lbs at 5'10, only thing that grew was his tits!!!
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: MindSpin on February 05, 2008, 11:29:27 AM
Arvilla hands down.  All heart but zero genetics...
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Pazuzu on February 05, 2008, 12:19:35 PM
That video clip is recent, I hadn't been on gear for almost two years there.

But I do have the worst form and I am the weakest bb in the whole world.

Those dumbbells are actually made of styrofoam. They probably only weigh about a half pound each and I could barely budge them.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 12:19:57 PM
I must not even look like an average guy then because Ron owns me physique wise  :'(


Have you been mega dosing for 10+ years like Ron has?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 12:23:07 PM
That video clip is recent, I hadn't been on gear for almost two years there.

But I do have the worst form and I am the weakest bb in the whole world.

Those dumbbells are actually made of styrofoam. They probably only weigh about a half pound each and I could barely budge them.



Ron you have admitted to consuming boatloads of gear over the last 10 years and you dont even break 200 lbs. You have the displine and the work ethic but when god was handing out BB genetics you must have been asleep.

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: FullROM on February 05, 2008, 12:25:03 PM
Arvilla hands down.  All heart but zero genetics...
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Livewire on February 05, 2008, 12:26:26 PM
Arvilla hands down.  All heart but zero genetics...

Mindspin,

Do you believe that Arvilla shows heart on Leg Day?

I mean, he has some mean shoulders and biceps, not because of genes, but because he cared abouit those bodyparts.  
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 12:31:36 PM
funny shit...Goattail got the facts wrong.....here's me completely clean for over a year dieted down clean without aas at 185....this is the lowest I've ever been.....fact is : I LOOK BETTER CLEAN THAN ALL U BITCHES ON YOUR HEAVY UG LAB CYCLES. SIC ....GOATGIRL IS ANOTHER INTERNET JEALOUS BITCH WHO I'D LIKE TO NAME PRESIDENT OF MY FANCLUB.BY THE WAY : IF ANY OF U BITCHES POST A PIC JUICED OR NOT THAT BEATS ME ALL BOW FOREVA BEFORE U...BUT U ALL KNOW THAT WHEN IT COMES TO WHO LOOKS BETTER i'M MICHAEL JACKSON AND U ARE TITO'S. BIOTCH  ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: G o a t b o y on February 05, 2008, 12:32:47 PM
But I do have the worst form and I am the weakest bb in the whole world.

Those dumbbells are actually made of styrofoam. They probably only weigh about a half pound each and I could barely budge them.


Admitting you have a problem is the first step towards recovery.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigbobs on February 05, 2008, 12:34:27 PM
About 50% of getbig members are juicing or have juiced in the past, even though few will admit it.  #1 and #2 above are in better shape than over 50% of getbiggers.  Hope this helps.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: beatmaster on February 05, 2008, 12:36:23 PM


         

was is he doing, shoulders or chest?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: michael arvilla on February 05, 2008, 12:37:31 PM
Arvilla hands down.  All heart but zero genetics...

"Heart" cant overcome "shitty genetics" but it can get you further than you ever dared dreamed.........

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 12:41:00 PM
AND ANOTHER THING : WHY NONE OF U SHITTALKERS AKA MUSSOLINI ( WHO WAS GAY BY THE WAY  :o ) NEVER HAVE THE BALLS TO ENTER MR GETBIG3 ?....OR AT LEAST POST A PIC: IF U LOOOK AT LEAST AS BAD AS ME YOU WOULDN'T HAVE PROBLEMS POSTING IT RIGHT ? :D


HERE'S MUSOLINNI OFFSEASON....AND BELLOW RIGHT BEFORE HIS LATEST MMA FIGHT
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 12:47:28 PM
As you can see Sevastase, you weigh about as much as my right leg.

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 05, 2008, 12:49:54 PM
As you can see Sevastase, you weigh about as much as my right leg.



ouch!

That must've hurt!

Right spermataster?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigbobs on February 05, 2008, 12:51:55 PM
ouch!

That must've hurt!

Right spermataster?

It would hurt if it was true.  However, from the pics they posted, they are pretty comparable.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: medz zeppelin on February 05, 2008, 12:53:24 PM
funny shit...Goattail got the facts wrong.....here's me completely clean for over a year dieted down clean without aas at 185....this is the lowest I've ever been.....fact is : I LOOK BETTER CLEAN THAN ALL U BITCHES ON YOUR HEAVY UG LAB CYCLES. SIC ....GOATGIRL IS ANOTHER INTERNET JEALOUS BITCH WHO I'D LIKE TO NAME PRESIDENT OF MY FANCLUB.BY THE WAY : IF ANY OF U BITCHES POST A PIC JUICED OR NOT THAT BEATS ME ALL BOW FOREVA BEFORE U...BUT U ALL KNOW THAT WHEN IT COMES TO WHO LOOKS BETTER i'M MICHAEL JACKSON AND U ARE TITO'S. BIOTCH  ;D
this guys gonna fight Zito and Van Damm at the same time.......hey send me a tapout hat
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 12:53:51 PM
It would hurt if it was true.  However, from the pics they posted, they are pretty comparable.

give or take the 70 lbs I have on him, and that I havent juiced in almost 6 years.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: nder98 on February 05, 2008, 12:56:16 PM
King Kamali...aka 'nder98'.

 Billy Gunns doesn't count because it is obvious that the gang in NYC area sold him sterile seasme oil so technically he's never used real gear.

LMAO!!!! ;D ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigbobs on February 05, 2008, 12:57:09 PM
give or take the 70 lbs I have on him, and that I havent juiced in almost 6 years.

I have no reason to be biased here.  You look a bit heavier than Sevastee from the pics posted - about 15 lbs tops, most of which is probably bodyfat since he is leaner.  I dont know when Sevastee has juiced or not, but it doesn't really matter because most people lose most of what they gained shortly after they stop juicing.  I'm not trying to hate on you, just calling it like it is.  For you to make a thread and post Sevastee's name as though he has horrible genetics, you should have a pic that is MUCH better than his, not comparable as you've shown.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 01:00:11 PM
I have no reason to be biased here.  You look a bit heavier than Sevastee from the pics posted - about 15 lbs tops, most of which is probably bodyfat since he is leaner.  I dont know when Sevastee has juiced or not, but it doesn't really matter because most people lose most of what they gained shortly after they stop juicing.  I'm not trying to hate on you, just calling it like it is.  For you to make a thread and post Sevastee's name as though he has horrible genetics, you should have a pic that is MUCH better than his, not comparable as you've shown.

Listen towel head, the thread says "worst genetics in response to gear".

Harris looks better than me in that pic to, but he has been on huge doses of gear for ten years.


if my thread was titled "best bodybuilding photos", you might have an argument.


The fact that Sevastase has run heavy cycles for years and looks similar to most natural guys is the point of my thread. Mabey I should type in arabic or punjabi so you can better understand.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:05:17 PM
give or take the 70 lbs I have on him.
u got 70 lbs on me ? u trying to be a guido with that retarded haircut ?  :D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigbobs on February 05, 2008, 01:06:39 PM
Listen towel head, the thread says "worst genetics in response to gear".

Harris looks better than me in that pic to, but he has been on huge doses of gear for ten years.


if my thread was titled "best bodybuilding photos", you might have an argument.


The fact that Sevastase has run heavy cycles for years and looks similar to most natural guys is the point of my thread. Mabey I should type in arabic or punjabi so you can better understand.

Looks like someone is MELTING DOWN because he didnt get the response he was hoping for.  You are DELUSIONAL to make comments like, "I have 70 lbs over Sevastee" or to think you're even in a different league than him.  Fact is, anyone who is unbiased here like me (not a buddy towards you or Sevastee) will agree with me.  The only people who will agree with you are people who dont like Sevastee for the way he posts or the fact that he comes across as a picture whore.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Pazuzu on February 05, 2008, 01:07:25 PM
Let's do the math:

late 1996-late 1997 = 1 year.
late 1999-early 2006 = close to 5 1/2 years.

Total time juicing: less than 7 years. Still a long time, but it's not ten.

I also didn't touch a drug until I was 27 years old.

Mussolini, you look about 22-24 and already juiced out of your mind. Am I right?

Also, my off-season weight when on was always around 230-240. Many, many people in the industry saw me this way and would laugh at your claim that I was hardly 200 pounds. I competed in shape at over 200 pounds about a half-dozen times.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 01:10:09 PM
Your the first to say im in a different league than that bald guy.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:10:23 PM
I have no reason to be biased here.  You look a bit heavier than Sevastee from the pics posted - about 15 lbs tops, most of which is probably bodyfat since he is leaner.  I dont know when Sevastee has juiced or not, but it doesn't really matter because most people lose most of what they gained shortly after they stop juicing.  I'm not trying to hate on you, just calling it like it is.  For you to make a thread and post Sevastee's name as though he has horrible genetics, you should have a pic that is MUCH better than his, not comparable as you've shown.
I did juiced and competed in the past....the pictures shown here on get big are all clean for at least a year....so basically he has never seen me juiced....also I want to know how this retard mausolini is heavier than me at 5'11" and 215 lbs in this picture...u trying to tell me he is 230 ?...and what ? 6'8" ?  :D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Van_Bilderass on February 05, 2008, 01:10:29 PM
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.
Get real! Ron Harris looks better than the vast majority of gym rat juicers. That's a fact.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Matt C on February 05, 2008, 01:10:54 PM
Why are you guys being mean to Ron?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 01:11:34 PM
Let's do the math:

late 1996-late 1997 = 1 year.
late 1999-early 2006 = close to 5 1/2 years.

Total time juicing: less than 7 years. Still a long time, but it's not ten.

I also didn't touch a drug until I was 27 years old.

Mussolini, you look about 22-24 and already juiced out of your mind. Am I right?

Also, my off-season weight when on was always around 230-240. Many, many people in the industry saw me this way and would laugh at your claim that I was hardly 200 pounds. I competed in shape at over 200 pounds about a half-dozen times.


Im 26 and did one cycle of d's when I was 19 or 20. I get tested every 2-3 months.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: ripitupbaby on February 05, 2008, 01:14:56 PM
Mussolini is looking quite delicious!

HI RON!!   :)

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 01:17:37 PM
Looks like someone is MELTING DOWN because he didnt get the response he was hoping for.  You are DELUSIONAL to make comments like, "I have 70 lbs over Sevastee" or to think you're even in a different league than him.  Fact is, anyone who is unbiased here like me (not a buddy towards you or Sevastee) will agree with me.  The only people who will agree with you are people who dont like Sevastee for the way he posts or the fact that he comes across as a picture whore.


Not a melt down, I just cant justify having a civilized debate with someone of your kind. Its in your blood, to be uncivilized.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:20:09 PM
you are 26...u are on a cycle and fatburners/t3 in that pic..your blod pressure is up from what I can see...u have shitty genetics from what I can tell and a bizarre frame...and with the risk of sounding conceited....I would be able to beat u in a bb competition easily even clean at 182-185 lbs...and u juiced at whatever weight u might be. any day sonny. U can also shut me up by entering mr getbig3.




AND ANOTHER THING : I BELIEVE I LOOK SHITTY AND HAVE MANY FLAWS BUT COMPARED TO U I THINK I'M FCUKING SHAWN RAY  ;)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: phyxsius on February 05, 2008, 01:21:26 PM
funny shit...Goattail got the facts wrong.....here's me completely clean for over a year dieted down clean without aas at 185....this is the lowest I've ever been.....fact is : I LOOK BETTER CLEAN THAN ALL U BITCHES ON YOUR HEAVY UG LAB CYCLES. SIC ....GOATGIRL IS ANOTHER INTERNET JEALOUS BITCH WHO I'D LIKE TO NAME PRESIDENT OF MY FANCLUB.BY THE WAY : IF ANY OF U BITCHES POST A PIC JUICED OR NOT THAT BEATS ME ALL BOW FOREVA BEFORE U...BUT U ALL KNOW THAT WHEN IT COMES TO WHO LOOKS BETTER i'M MICHAEL JACKSON AND U ARE TITO'S. BIOTCH  ;D

meltdown
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: FullROM on February 05, 2008, 01:21:26 PM
As you can see Sevastase, you weigh about as much as my right leg.



Monster waist
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 05, 2008, 01:22:41 PM
you are 26...u are on a cycle and fatburners/t3 in that pic..your blod pressure is up from what I can see...u have shitty genetics from what I can tell and a bizarre frame...and with the risk of sounding conceited....I would be able to beat u in a bb competition easily even clean at 182-185 lbs...and u juiced at whatever weight u might be. any day sonny. U can also shut me up by entering mr getbig3.




AND ANOTHER THING : I BELIEVE I LOOK SHITTY AND HAVE MANY FLAWS BUT COMPARED TO U I THINK I'M FCUKING SHAWN RAY  ;)

brutal insecurity issues.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:26:01 PM
Monster waist
I'D SAY HE IS DEFINATELY MORE GIFTED THAN ME ....TO BEAR A CHILD PERHAPS....NICE CLEPSIDRA ( HOURGLASS ) SHAPE....WIDE HIPS...DEF A NATURAL EXIT ( NO NEED FOR C SECTION ON THIS MERMAID )  :D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:27:44 PM
brutal insecurity issues.
IN THOSE PICS ( black and white ) I'm clean and about 182 lbs...even u admited in the past that u would like to be able to look like me in those pics...so why hate on me now ?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 05, 2008, 01:28:22 PM
IN THOSE PICS ( black and white ) I'm clean and about 182 lbs...even u admited in the past that u would like to be able to look like me in those pics...so why hate on me now ?

haha, i never said that. total bullshit.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigbobs on February 05, 2008, 01:28:53 PM

Not a melt down, I just cant justify having a civilized debate with someone of your kind. Its in your blood, to be uncivilized.

Sure, maybe I'm uncivilized, but at least I'm not delusional like you are  ;)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:29:17 PM
Mussolini is looking quite delicious!

HI RON!!   :)


are u really a gay guy ?...or u just have a bad case of clitosaurusitis ?  :-X
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 05, 2008, 01:32:36 PM
you can knock on ron's form or whatever, but he definitely has a hell of a build. i'd say he just doesn't have a lot of gear-response. it's not like a night and day difference like levrone or wheeler where on the gear he's a goliath and off he's scrawny. on the gear he looks big, off he looks slightly less big. good genetics for natural building, absolutely awful for blowing up on the gear.

remember some guys can take a gram of test a week and put on 30 pounds, some guys take 250 and put on 50. i think ron's in the first one.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:34:54 PM
I want to clarify one thing : I do post a lot of pics of me because Ilike to back up with a picture or a video any shit talking I do or any claim I make . And I'm happy with it because is harder than to be an annonimous internet shittalker who loves to criticize..or for example like musoleany who posted a pic and will never post another one becose he realized that he looks shitty and worse , he looks like crapcompared the guys he tried to make fun of : me and ron harris.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 05, 2008, 01:37:25 PM
I want to clarify one thing : I do post a lot of pics of me because Ilike to back up with a picture or a video any shit talking I do or any claim I make . And I'm happy with it because is harder than to be an annonimous internet shittalker who loves to criticize..or for example like musoleany who posted a pic and will never post another one becose he realized that he looks shitty and worse , he looks like crapcompared the guys he tried to make fun of : me and ron harris.

you're a little insecure attention whore, that's all.

crying for attention on an internet message board is really low.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: ripitupbaby on February 05, 2008, 01:38:39 PM
are u really a gay guy ?...or u just have a bad case of clitosaurusitis ?  :-X


oh brother.   ::)

Sev, you look good too, you get very lean with nice leg separation, and you are pretty strong.  Feel better now?

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:39:18 PM
you're a little insecure attention whore, that's all.

crying for attention on an internet message board is really low.
u need new material. this shitis too old by now. now scoot.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 05, 2008, 01:40:40 PM

oh brother.   ::)

Sev, you look good too, you get very lean with nice leg separation, and you are pretty strong.  Feel better now?

i don't think i've ever seen anyone as insecure as this dude. and i'm not even making that up. in the six years i've been on bodybuilding message boards, he's the most insecure i've seen that wasn't a teenager.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 05, 2008, 01:42:23 PM
u need new material. this shitis too old by now. now scoot.


it's true, that's what's so sad about it.

It's not even meant as a joke or making fun of you, it's simply the truth.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:46:56 PM

oh brother.   ::)

Sev, you look good too, you get very lean with nice leg separation, and you are pretty strong.  Feel better now?


I'm not very lean...and no I don't feel better....I didn't mean to insult u but to find this dude mussolini attractive is a bit far fetched...even for u . He has a spiky haircut better fitted on a 14 yo guido hoping to grope a tit ina busy nightclub on the Jersey shore, he has wide hips..wider than his shoulders...very sexy  ::) , he wears a pinky ring and a bracelet...cheesier than Crazee Wear , HE WEARS SPANDEX ( MAJOR HOMO ALERT ) .....
HE HAS A CANICHE DOG......SCREAMS HOMOEROTIC TENDENCIES



U GET MY DRIFT : HE IS A CHEESEBALL WITH HOMO WRITTEN ALL OVER HIM WHO LIVES IN HIM PARENTS HOUSE....THIS IS WHY U ( A WOMAN ) FINDING HIM ATTRACTIVE STRIKES ME A BIT ODD ( TO SAY THE LEAST )
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: MindSpin on February 05, 2008, 01:47:28 PM
I would also throw myself into this group.  For as hard as I trained/dieted/juiced, I should have been Mr. Olympia.  But, I barely even placed at the Mr. LA.

True Adonis is definitely up there as well.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 05, 2008, 01:48:01 PM
I'm not very lean...and no I don't feel better....I didn't mean to insult u but to find this dude mussolini attractive is a bit far fetched...even for u . He has a spiky haircut better fitted on a 14 yo guido hoping to grope a tit ina busy nightclub on the Jersey shore, he has wide hips..wider than his shoulders...very sexy  ::) , he wears a pinky ring and a bracelet...cheesier than Crazee Wear , HE WEARS SPANDEX ( MAJOR HOMO ALERT ) .....
HE HAS A CANICHE DOG......SCREAMS HOMOEROTIC TENDENCIES



U GET MY DRIFT : HE IS A CHEESEBALL WITH HOMO WRITTEN ALL OVER HIM WHO LIVES IN HIM PARENTS HOUSE....THIS IS WHY U ( A WOMAN ) FINDING HIM ATTRACTIVE STRIKES ME A BIT ODD ( TO SAY THE LEAST )

brutal insecurity.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 01:48:56 PM
i don't think i've ever seen anyone as insecure as this dude. and i'm not even making that up. in the six years i've been on bodybuilding message boards, he's the most insecure i've seen that wasn't a teenager.
U JUST MAD CAUSE i'M WAY STRONGER THAN U ;)



Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: ripitupbaby on February 05, 2008, 01:50:20 PM
I'm not very lean...and no I don't feel better....I didn't mean to insult u but to find this dude mussolini attractive is a bit far fetched...even for u . He has a spiky haircut better fitted on a 14 yo guido hoping to grope a tit ina busy nightclub on the Jersey shore, he has wide hips..wider than his shoulders...very sexy  ::) , he wears a pinky ring and a bracelet...cheesier than Crazee Wear , HE WEARS SPANDEX ( MAJOR HOMO ALERT ) .....
HE HAS A CANICHE DOG......SCREAMS HOMOEROTIC TENDENCIES



U GET MY DRIFT : HE IS A CHEESEBALL WITH HOMO WRITTEN ALL OVER HIM WHO LIVES IN HIM PARENTS HOUSE....THIS IS WHY U ( A WOMAN ) FINDING HIM ATTRACTIVE STRIKES ME A BIT ODD ( TO SAY THE LEAST )


LOL "even for u"   ;D

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: medz zeppelin on February 05, 2008, 01:55:54 PM
I'm not very lean...and no I don't feel better....I didn't mean to insult u but to find this dude mussolini attractive is a bit far fetched...even for u . He has a spiky haircut better fitted on a 14 yo guido hoping to grope a tit ina busy nightclub on the Jersey shore, he has wide hips..wider than his shoulders...very sexy  ::) , he wears a pinky ring and a bracelet...cheesier than Crazee Wear , HE WEARS SPANDEX ( MAJOR HOMO ALERT ) .....
HE HAS A CANICHE DOG......SCREAMS HOMOEROTIC TENDENCIES



U GET MY DRIFT : HE IS A CHEESEBALL WITH HOMO WRITTEN ALL OVER HIM WHO LIVES IN HIM PARENTS HOUSE....THIS IS WHY U ( A WOMAN ) FINDING HIM ATTRACTIVE STRIKES ME A BIT ODD ( TO SAY THE LEAST )
hahaha trying to control peoples thoughts and opinions from 6000 miles away........fuckin douche bag
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: ripitupbaby on February 05, 2008, 01:56:45 PM
HERE TO MAKE IT UP TO YOU RIPITUPBABY , I'LL THROW IN A PICTURE JUST FOR U ( I'M SURE MUSOLINI WILL DROOL ALL OVER IT TOO  :-X)


 :D


I KNOW you have the front view too...let's have a look.   :)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 02:01:32 PM

I KNOW you have the front view too...let's have a look.   :)

i DID GET IN TIMEOUT FOR POSTING MY DICK ON THE BOARD A WHILE BACK...i TRIED TO POST IT NOW BUT IT KEEPS SAYING  : " too large..." ....it's 20 cm ...whatever is that in inches  ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 02:05:39 PM
Sure, maybe I'm uncivilized, but at least I'm not delusional like you are  ;)

Delusional? to say that someone (sevastase) who has admitted to juicing heavily and maxing out at 182 lbs has shit genetics for gear?

When did I ever say I had good genetics? Its not about me, its about heavy juicer who look like naturals.

Now go praise allah and plan some terror strikes you rag head.

Does immigration even know about bigbobs? To think what your kind is doing to my country pains me.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: saucetradomous on February 05, 2008, 02:07:02 PM
I'm going to agree with donkey on this one.. Sev seems insecure.  posting these vids and crying out for attention with ass pics and vids along with scrolling pink text.  Granted that's a decent squat but it only helps to prove your lack of genetic potential in response to heavy training.  
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigbobs on February 05, 2008, 02:41:26 PM
Delusional? to say that someone (sevastase) who has admitted to juicing heavily and maxing out at 182 lbs has shit genetics for gear?

When did I ever say I had good genetics? Its not about me, its about heavy juicer who look like naturals.

Now go praise allah and plan some terror strikes you rag head.

Does immigration even know about bigbobs? To think what your kind is doing to my country pains me.

It was DELUSIONAL for you to think that you look so much better than Sev which you implied when saying, "you weigh about as much as my right thigh," and another comment too I can't remember and am too lazy to scroll back to repaste it.  That's laughable when you and him look comparable from your pic to the many that he has posted (and that's being generous). 

Why is it that on this site most often when one (like Mussolini) tries to make fun of another or dedicates a thread to them, that the thread-starter is either comparable to or in worse shape than the one being made fun of?  ::)  Then he tries passing it on as, "well he took gear more recently than me," "he took more gear than me," blah blah.  Fvcking delusional.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Pazuzu on February 05, 2008, 02:46:47 PM
Hey Lori, are you and Tony going to the Arnold?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DVSGOD on February 05, 2008, 02:54:35 PM
About 50% of getbig members are juicing or have juiced in the past, even though few will admit it.  #1 and #2 above are in better shape than over 50% of getbiggers.  Hope this helps.
Agree with bigbob ,
He is very on to it when not disscussing Nasser  ;D :D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Meltdown on February 05, 2008, 03:02:02 PM
Try training heavy and eating clean for a couple of years then if you use and don't have great improvements in 8weeks Give Up and take up golf. ::)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: LMV on February 05, 2008, 03:15:16 PM


squadfather
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: titusisback on February 05, 2008, 03:31:54 PM
Mussolini, are you going to post videos of you lifting stuff and/or other photos that prove that you're way bigger?

Or are you just going to let yout guido hair and homo spandex do all the talking?  ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: gordiano on February 05, 2008, 03:44:26 PM
LOL, another lovely day at Getbig....... ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 05, 2008, 03:48:04 PM
Mussolini, are you going to post videos of you lifting stuff and/or other photos that prove that you're way bigger?

Or are you just going to let yout guido hair and homo spandex do all the talking?  ;D

Isn't he a real cage fighter though? Did you see the bloodied pics of him? He looked kinda big, but not ripped or anything.

Anyways, I vote for Kamali.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigguns23 on February 05, 2008, 04:31:30 PM
Ron Harris, by miles, the guy is a fucking disgrace but is the absolute pictureboy for so many
Bodybuilding gym rats on this planet.


You don't even know Ron, and you are calling him a disgrace? What are you?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Epic_Monster on February 05, 2008, 05:21:21 PM
I vote for me - I have seen 15-year-old anorexic girls with more mass than me. Ants have more mass!

Epic self-owning (did I say that right?)

Nice stringer tank!! ;)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: titusisback on February 05, 2008, 05:29:31 PM
Isn't he a real cage fighter though? Did you see the bloodied pics of him? He looked kinda big, but not ripped or anything.

Nope, didn't see those pics. Got a link?

P.S. Nasser rules
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Solid Attitude on February 05, 2008, 05:41:42 PM
You know what say what you want about Ron, but the boy came to California with a dream of working in the BB world as a writer. He has certainly achieved that dream and along the way built a damn good physique.

Ron will be the first to admit that he couldn't win the Nationals but that wasn't his dream. His goal was to win that show in Mass which he eventually did which in his world was a grand achievement.

Do I agree with all of Rons philosophy? NO! But you know what he has amassed a tremendous amount of BB knowledge in his life time and is one of the few people to make a living in BB doing something he loves to do.

There will always be haters and Ron of all people knows that and he handles it better than many of you guys would like him to. He is honest and witty and he lets the hating roll off his back.
So Ron you're alright in my book bro!
TRES
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 05:49:13 PM
Nope, didn't see those pics. Got a link?

P.S. Nasser rules

Here is what I looked like after I got into a tussle with Sevastase
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: SirTraps on February 05, 2008, 05:52:02 PM
You know what say what you want about Ron, but the boy came to California with a dream of working in the BB world as a writer. He has certainly achieved that dream and along the way built a damn good physique.

Ron will be the first to admit that he couldn't win the Nationals but that wasn't his dream. His goal was to win that show in Mass which he eventually did which in his world was a grand achievement.

Do I agree with all of Rons philosophy? NO! But you know what he has amassed a tremendous amount of BB knowledge in his life time and is one of the few people to make a living in BB doing something he loves to do.

There will always be haters and Ron of all people knows that and he handles it better than many of you guys would like him to. He is honest and witty and he lets the hating roll off his back.
So Ron you're alright in my book bro!
TRES

       HI RON  ::)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 05, 2008, 05:53:38 PM
Moussolini is one tough SOB.

Mad respect.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigguns23 on February 05, 2008, 05:54:47 PM
Here is what I looked like after I got into a tussle with Sevastase

Doubt it.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: JohnnyVegas on February 05, 2008, 05:57:36 PM
NPC officials even felt so bad for me that even though I weighed in at only 121 pounds at 6-4, they allowed me to compete as a Heavyweight on several occasions. The judges felt so bad that for me I took second place at the New England twice as a HW, and twice at the Massachusetts State too.

And this was with 1,000 mg of Sustanon every hour, 50 tabs of d-bol and Winstrol a day, and 500 mg. of Deca every day.

You are not 6'4.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: titusisback on February 05, 2008, 05:58:15 PM
Here is what I looked like after I got into a tussle with Sevastase

Rough man. Props for that.

Still, you don't see all that much bigger than Sevastase, probably weaker too. Why not just say that you could kick his ass, instead of claiming you're huge compared to him?  ???
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 06:10:21 PM
Rough man. Props for that.

Still, you don't see all that much bigger than Sevastase, probably weaker too. Why not just say that you could kick his ass, instead of claiming you're huge compared to him?  ???


Never said I had a better body than him, and I doubt that I am weaker than him in any of the three big lifts, but who knows.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: NeverTrustABlonde on February 05, 2008, 06:43:44 PM
Here is what I looked like after I got into a tussle with Sevastase

ur kinda cute.....
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: JohnnyVegas on February 05, 2008, 06:48:07 PM
ur kinda cute.....

Show us  your tits  ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: NeverTrustABlonde on February 05, 2008, 06:53:50 PM
Show us  your tits  ;D

no  >:(
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: tu_holmes on February 05, 2008, 06:56:40 PM
Show us  your tits  ;D

Ahh... This is why everyone loves getbig.

:D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: calmus on February 05, 2008, 06:58:47 PM
no  >:(

You ashamed of them, or just prudish?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Camel Jockey on February 05, 2008, 07:03:29 PM
I demand that you show your tits in honor of Mussolini.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: calmus on February 05, 2008, 07:04:52 PM

It appears that "nevertrustablonde" is having a crisis of confidence....poor girl.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 07:10:00 PM
I demand that you show your tits in honor of Mussolini.

Yah In Honor of IL Duce show us your tits, don't be shy.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: windsor88 on February 05, 2008, 07:15:00 PM
U JUST MAD CAUSE i'M WAY STRONGER THAN U ;)




How come with 6 plates a side that bar doesn't bend at all.  The bar bends when I have 4 a side.   ???
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 07:28:00 PM
How come with 6 plates a side that bar doesn't bend at all.  The bar bends when I have 4 a side.   ???


He has already posted numerous picks of him using huge poundages. He later admitted he was using fake weights.

I would assume this is the case as well.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 07:30:07 PM
Rough man. Props for that.

Still, you don't see all that much bigger than Sevastase, probably weaker too. Why not just say that you could kick his ass, instead of claiming you're huge compared to him?  ???


Also I think that you, myself and 90% of others here on getbig would look better than Sevastase had we ran sustenon continually for three years straight, all the while cycles d-bol and a-boms as Sevastase has and has amitted on two other boards.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 07:31:07 PM
Moussolini is one tough SOB.

Mad respect.


Thank you for he kind words, your phsique is top notch.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: sgt. d on February 05, 2008, 07:31:17 PM
no  >:(

You don't have a choice.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Big Worm on February 05, 2008, 07:34:01 PM
I vote for me - I have seen 15-year-old anorexic girls with more mass than me. Ants have more mass!

Epic self-owning (did I say that right?)
Can't argue with you there buddy..












 P.S. You're wife is a doll! Post some pics of her and her friend here .. What the hell?!
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 05, 2008, 07:46:13 PM
U JUST MAD CAUSE i'M WAY STRONGER THAN U ;)

considering i'm 10 years younger than you and drug-free? i'd HOPE you're stronger than me. it'd be sad as fuck if you weren't.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 05, 2008, 07:55:42 PM
considering i'm 10 years younger than you and drug-free? i'd HOPE you're stronger than me. it'd be sad as fuck if you weren't.


No kidding, this guy has been on test and d-bol for three straight years and brags because he can finally bench 245 for 3 on flat.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: NeverTrustABlonde on February 05, 2008, 08:20:12 PM
You ashamed of them, or just prudish?

prudish.... extremely
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: MisterMagoo on February 05, 2008, 08:31:12 PM

No kidding, this guy has been on test and d-bol for three straight years and brags because he can finally bench 245 for 3 on flat.

the dude said "clean" to him meant only dbol. jeezus, dbol only is a cycle to me (a dumb cycle, granted), that's "clean" to him??
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 11:54:17 PM

Also I think that you, myself and 90% of others here on getbig would look better than Sevastase had we ran sustenon continually for three years straight, all the while cycles d-bol and a-boms as Sevastase has and has amitted on two other boards.
here's your problem cagefighter....( u look so depressed and abused cuddling yourself on the couch after a copious ass beating u just took ) I don't post on other boards....I do have an acc at md and milossarcev.com but I do not post there...And I NEVER SAID I TOOK SUSTANON DBOL AND WHATEVER ELSE FOR 3 YEARS STRAIGHT....U JUST LIE AND U MAD CAUSE I LOOK BETTER. BY THE WAY : DO NOT OPEN YOUR BIG MOUTH AND SAY U STRONGER THAN ME UNTIL U POST A VIDEO BENCHING 400 X 3 AND SQUATTING 500 X 3....OK SWEETHEART ? MMA MY ASS ...U KNOW DEEP INSIDE YOUR HEART THAT IN REAL LIFE I'D MAKE U A TRUE BOTTOM ;)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 05, 2008, 11:58:50 PM
the dude said "clean" to him meant only dbol. jeezus, dbol only is a cycle to me (a dumb cycle, granted), that's "clean" to him??
MAGOO...AGAIN U ARE RUNNING YOUR MOUTH AFTER WE BOTH AGREED U ARE A LITTLE BITCH WHO TRIES TO JERK A BARBELLON VIDEO HOPING TO BE THE NEXT COLEMAN. WANNABE...WHY U SO JEALOUS ANYWAY ?...U KNOW , IF U DON'T HAVE IT ,THAT'SALL RIGHT TOO . bUT DON'T KNOCK ME FOR BEING ABLE TO DO WHAT U DREAM OF.BITCH . ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 06, 2008, 12:02:08 AM

Thank you for he kind words, your phsique is top notch.
:D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D


THIS IS THE GETBIG DELUSIONAL POST OF THE YEAR....2 BITCHES COMPLIMENTING EACH OTHER . AND TO ILLUSTRATE THE 2 SHEILAS WE ARE TALKING ABOUT :
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: titusisback on February 06, 2008, 12:03:28 AM
UNTIL U POST A VIDEO BENCHING 400 X 3 AND SQUATTING 500 X 3...

Your squat looks real, but I was just about to ask what your bench weight was. Sorry, but those plates don't seem like 45s. The bar with those plates just looks too light. So, I'm calling bullshit on 400 x 3 bench. You upper body is too skinny to bench 3 x 400 anyways.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: titusisback on February 06, 2008, 12:06:09 AM
Actually, I just checked your squats. The bar doesn't bend at all. Your lift claims are bullshit. Sorry dude.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 06, 2008, 12:08:19 AM

Also I think that you, myself and 90% of others here on getbig would look better than Sevastase had we ran sustenon continually for three years straight, all the while cycles d-bol and a-boms as Sevastase has and has amitted on two other boards.
Copy and paste where I admitted to whatever u claim and I'll shut up forever and never use my account on getbig....we both know u are full of shit...post a clear full body pic where u illustrate how much better u are  ::) and a video like I did benching 400 + and squatting 500 +

SOMEONE IN AN EARLIER POST THOUGHT 500 LBS X 3 IS " DECENT "  :o ....SO i THOUGHT I'D POST 240 KG'S FOR A SINGLE MAYBE HE'LL GIVE ME MORE CREDIT  ::) ....


Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 06, 2008, 12:12:44 AM
Your squat looks real, but I was just about to ask what your bench weight was. Sorry, but those plates don't seem like 45s. The bar with those plates just looks too light. So, I'm calling bullshit on 400 x 3 bench. You upper body is too skinny to bench 3 x 400 anyways.
Thank u dude...I now realize how a powerlifting expert such as yourself can make the connection between my size and strenghth ....here's how small I was in the benching video ( I am afraid to even contemplate what living giants consider 5'11" and 215 lbs small )

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 06, 2008, 12:15:11 AM
Your squat looks real, but I was just about to ask what your bench weight was. Sorry, but those plates don't seem like 45s. The bar with those plates just looks too light. So, I'm calling bullshit on 400 x 3 bench. You upper body is too skinny to bench 3 x 400 anyways.
Another thing homosapiens....the squat and the bench both use exactly the same discs hahhahahahhaaa..so the squat loooks real to ya but the bench doesn't  ::) .. go figure
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 06, 2008, 12:17:50 AM
Actually, I just checked your squats. The bar doesn't bend at all. Your lift claims are bullshit. Sorry dude.
JUST SO you understand this shit properly : when u say u can do something = " A CLAIM "  .... when u post a video doing it = " MAJOR OWNAGE OF titusbiotch "  ;)  ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 12:24:42 AM
JUST SO you understand this shit properly : when u say u can do something = " A CLAIM "  .... when u post a video doing it = " MAJOR OWNAGE OF titusbiotch "  ;)  ;D


Sevastase, you admiitted to posting pics with you moving fake weights before, why would we believe you now?

YOur a mega doser and your physique is average, as is mine expect I havent touch roids.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 06, 2008, 12:32:57 AM

Sevastase, you admiitted to posting pics with you moving fake weights before, why would we believe you now?

YOur a mega doser and your physique is average, as is mine expect I havent touch roids.
copy and paste those posts homo erectus and we can have a discussion or u can call me out...untill then u are talking just shit. How your MMA  record by the way ?  :D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: The Master on February 06, 2008, 01:47:54 AM
Here is what I looked like after I got into a tussle with Sevastase


MMA = rough sport ;D


Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 06, 2008, 02:30:39 AM

MMA = rough sport ;D



You know , he never got into a fight ..the black eye is from his hairy toothless crackwhore mom for not bringing her sammich fast enough  :D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: 3Dkiller on February 06, 2008, 03:17:14 AM
sevastase looks oke to me, Billy guns is using fake steroid  :D
my vote goes for BillY noGuns
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Cleanest Natural on February 06, 2008, 03:22:15 AM
What about squadfather ?...he talks immense shit but is extremely fat and noone has seen him lift even though he benches about 180 kilos  ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Pazuzu on February 06, 2008, 04:50:01 AM
I guarantee you all that if 99.9 % of you met me, we would get along like old friends. I feel a very strong kinship with others that follow the bodybuilding lifestyle. All of you out there that live this crazy life of lifting heavy weights and eating more than twice as much food as the average man - whether you want to admit or not, we are all brothers. I respect all the veterans that have been doing this shit a long-ass time, and I always want to help out the newer guys and pass on anything I have learned that might help them.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: GoneAway on February 06, 2008, 04:57:17 AM
I guarantee you all that if 99.9 % of you met me, we would get along like old friends. I feel a very strong kinship with others that follow the bodybuilding lifestyle. All of you out there that live this crazy life of lifting heavy weights and eating more than twice as much food as the average man - whether you want to admit or not, we are all brothers. I respect all the veterans that have been doing this shit a long-ass time, and I always want to help out the newer guys and pass on anything I have learned that might help them.

good way of looking at it. i dont know y u get so much shit here. u have/had a great physique.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: will938 on February 06, 2008, 05:41:36 AM
Sev gets my vote. At least Ron has a decent sense of humour ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: ripitupbaby on February 06, 2008, 06:19:19 AM
Hey Lori, are you and Tony going to the Arnold?


Yep, we'll both be there, we're going with Dave and Maggs (Dave's competing)...looking forward to catching up with you!   :)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 06:24:47 AM
I guarantee you all that if 99.9 % of you met me, we would get along like old friends. I feel a very strong kinship with others that follow the bodybuilding lifestyle. All of you out there that live this crazy life of lifting heavy weights and eating more than twice as much food as the average man - whether you want to admit or not, we are all brothers. I respect all the veterans that have been doing this shit a long-ass time, and I always want to help out the newer guys and pass on anything I have learned that might help them.


Do you feel that way about Lee Priest? Before you started spreading horrific rumours about him? Are you guys "brothers in Iron", no wonder your wife wants to leave you, your a gossip queen.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: TrueGrit on February 06, 2008, 06:26:35 AM
SAY WHAT?

lol.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 06:27:22 AM
those pic were taken 6 years after my first and only cycle.

IF your clean for 5 years your considered natural in bodybuilding terms, thats what muscle mania goes by anyway.


BTW have your muslim genetics allowed you to break 165 lbs yet?  Try eating more and hitting the sauce. Sevastase can help you with your cycle, it will tranform your physique dramatically like his.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: titusisback on February 06, 2008, 06:27:30 AM
Thank u dude...I now realize how a powerlifting expert such as yourself can make the connection between my size and strenghth ....here's how small I was in the benching video ( I am afraid to even contemplate what living giants consider 5'11" and 215 lbs small )

No need to get upset. That's just my opinion. The weights just don't look heavy enough. And before you start posting pictures to prove how HUUUUUGE you are, perhaps you should realize that I in fact am much bigger than you are.

Have a great day
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 06:29:08 AM
those pic were taken 6 years after my first and only cycle.

IF your clean for 5 years your considered natural in bodybuilding terms, thats what muscle mania goes by anyway.

lol.

natural in BB terms is 500mg test and arimidex.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: TrueGrit on February 06, 2008, 06:30:54 AM
lol.

natural in BB terms is 500mg test and arimidex.

Natural is what you can (semi) plausibly deny!
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 06:31:38 AM
lol.

natural in BB terms is 500mg test and arimidex.

I agree with you the testing is a joke, I consider myself at natty becasue 5 years or more have passed since I ate d-bols, but I doubt many that their are actualy too many naturals in muscle mania or any other natural contest for that matter.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: medz zeppelin on February 06, 2008, 06:50:46 AM
is it me or is lifting without a shirt on fucking gay. Put your shirt back on Sev you're not that big.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: chester_bbb on February 06, 2008, 06:59:21 AM
Looks like someone is MELTING DOWN because he didnt get the response he was hoping for.  You are DELUSIONAL to make comments like, "I have 70 lbs over Sevastee" or to think you're even in a different league than him.  Fact is, anyone who is unbiased here like me (not a buddy towards you or Sevastee) will agree with me.  The only people who will agree with you are people who dont like Sevastee for the way he posts or the fact that he comes across as a picture whore.

As delusional as 300lbs with abs. ::)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: chester_bbb on February 06, 2008, 07:01:22 AM
Mussolini is looking quite delicious!

HI RON!!   :)



You into the guido look?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: The Master on February 06, 2008, 07:04:04 AM

Yep, we'll both be there, we're going with Dave and Maggs (Dave's competing)...looking forward to catching up with you!   :)


If Debussey comes up to say HI, will you spit on Debussey like your friend in gender, DA? :D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: ripitupbaby on February 06, 2008, 07:09:52 AM
If Debussey comes up to say HI, will you spit on Debussey like your friend in gender, DA? :D


Nah, I'll just kick you in your c*nt.   ;D

Your parents flying you over for the ASC? 
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: The Master on February 06, 2008, 07:11:53 AM

Nah, I'll just kick you in your c*nt.   ;D

Your parents flying you over for the ASC? 


Yep. After years of doing nothing but eating prozac, valium and chips in Debusseys parents basement and doing an occational workout with 70 pound squats, Debussey = broke.

But they gladly pay for the trip, so Debussey can laugh of you. :D :) ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: ripitupbaby on February 06, 2008, 07:15:03 AM
Yep. After years of doing nothing but eating prozac, valium and chips in Debusseys parents basement and doing an occational workout with 70 pound squats, Debussey = broke.

But they gladly pay for the trip, so Debussey can laugh of you. :D :) ;D


I guarantee you 100% that you will hide from me like the pussy that you are. 

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 07:15:54 AM
You into the guido look?

Lots of chicks are, if your really Italian and not a fake.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 07:16:27 AM
Lots of chicks are, if your really Italian and not a fake.

i bet my ass you can't speak a word italian.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: The Master on February 06, 2008, 07:17:53 AM

I guarantee you 100% that you will hide from me like the pussy that you are. 



No. But Debussey will keep a safe distance to avoid your ammonia stinking breath.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 07:29:52 AM
i bet my ass you can't speak a word italian.


Actually im pretty good at it, I can also speak French too as it is/was mandatory in Canadian schools. French is very similair to Italian, they help with each other.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 07:31:24 AM

Actually im pretty good at it, I can also speak French too as it is/was mandatory in Canadian schools. French is very similair to Italian, they help with each other.

lol, you're a REAL italian.  ::) ::) ::)

i love you americans.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 07:32:48 AM
lol, you're a REAL italian.  ::) ::) ::)

i love you americans.


Im not American, where did you get that?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 07:35:18 AM

Im not American, where did you get that?

Not US american, but you said canadian school. that's north america to me.

If i want to include canada and the US, i say america or north america.  ::)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: chester_bbb on February 06, 2008, 07:43:04 AM

He has already posted numerous picks of him using huge poundages. He later admitted he was using fake weights.

I would assume this is the case as well.

How pathetic. More pathetic than beating your wife or only being able to last 17 seconds. Maybe not. :D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: kyomu on February 06, 2008, 07:44:28 AM
Not US american, but you said canadian school. that's north america to me.

If i want to include canada and the US, i say america or north america.  ::)
Haha I understand you Donkey, many of my american friends say that they are trilingual or something...And you know... ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: titusisback on February 06, 2008, 07:44:46 AM
is it me or is lifting without a shirt on fucking gay. Put your shirt back on Sev you're not that big.

Yah, it's pretty gay
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: chester_bbb on February 06, 2008, 07:45:17 AM
prudish.... extremely

How about an ass shot. :o
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 07:46:33 AM
Not US american, but you said canadian school. that's north america to me.

If i want to include canada and the US, i say america or north america.  ::)


And you say we are Ignorant? Might aswell call England, Italy, Sweden and German all Europe, no need to specify, there all the same. ::)


Where are you from DonkeyKong? My guess is your a Muslim of some sort.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 07:49:02 AM

And you say we are Ignorant? Might aswell call England, Italy, Sweden and German all Europe, no need to specify, there all the same. ::)

they are not the same, but certain aspects are.

If you want to include germans, spain, french into something, you call them 'europeans'.

it's not ignorant, it's very common.

You are an idiot.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: kyomu on February 06, 2008, 07:50:51 AM

And you say we are Ignorant? Might aswell call England, Italy, Sweden and German all Europe, no need to specify, there all the same. ::)
From Point of view of Japanese who live in Spain and has lived in US near from Canada,Canada and US are so much alike.
But Germany, France,Spain Italy...etc are so different.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 07:54:10 AM
they are not the same, but certain aspects are.

If you want to include germans, spain, french into something, you call them 'europeans'.

it's not ignorant, it's very common.

You are an idiot.
[/quote


Classifying Americans, Canadians and Mexicans as "American" is pretty stupid.

Again where are you from DK?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: kyomu on February 06, 2008, 07:56:24 AM
they are not the same, but certain aspects are.

If you want to include germans, spain, french into something, you call them 'europeans'.

it's not ignorant, it's very common.

You are an idiot.
[/quote


Classifying Americans, Canadians and Mexicans as "American" is pretty stupid.

Again where are you from DK?
He is a Germany who speak multiple languages 8)
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: calmus on February 06, 2008, 08:02:41 AM

prudish.... extremely


It's 2008.....time to get over such dated hang-ups.  Let Getbig G&O be your avenue to an unfettered life.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: chester_bbb on February 06, 2008, 08:11:38 AM

Actually im pretty good at it, I can also speak French too as it is/was mandatory in Canadian schools. French is very similair to Italian, they help with each other.

Hey Mussolini comment ça va?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: bigbobs on February 06, 2008, 08:52:15 AM
Mussolini, you're in decent shape.  Why dont you just man up and admit that you and Sevastee are comparable, instead of insisting that he weighs as much as one leg of yours and then trying to compare who has taken how much gear how long ago and for what period of time.  Who really cares, that stuff is not even verifiable.  Many people here are juiced to the grills and would never admit it anyway.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 09:18:18 AM
Hey Mussolini comment ça va?

ca va bein, est tu?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 09:23:00 AM
ca va bein, est tu?

et tu!

not 'est tu'

Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 09:27:22 AM
et tu!

not 'est tu'



im not perfect, its my third language, but thanks for claryfing.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 09:28:31 AM
im not perfect, its my third language, but thanks for claryfing.

nevermind, it's my fourth language.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: kyomu on February 06, 2008, 09:29:59 AM
Mussolini, you're in decent shape.  Why dont you just man up and admit that you and Sevastee are comparable, instead of insisting that he weighs as much as one leg of yours and then trying to compare who has taken how much gear how long ago and for what period of time.  Who really cares, that stuff is not even verifiable.  Many people here are juiced to the grills and would never admit it anyway.
Just Mussolini must compete in Getbig3 thats all.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 09:30:14 AM
nevermind, it's my fourth language.

so where are you from England?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 09:31:57 AM
Just Mussolini must compete in Getbig3 thats all.


Why? Im not a bodybuilder, and have an average physique.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 09:33:45 AM
so where are you from England?


no, germany.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 09:36:23 AM

no, germany.

YOu were born in Germany? Your English is very good. Do most europeans speak multiple languages? When I was young some hockey players from Sweden stayed with us and could already speak 4-5 languages at age 12 or so.

Most Canadians speak 1 or 2.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: kyomu on February 06, 2008, 09:37:06 AM

Why? Im not a bodybuilder, and have an average physique.
You look good and can destroy Sevas mercilessly.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 09:41:22 AM
YOu were born in Germany? Your English is very good. Do most europeans speak multiple languages? When I was young some hockey players from Sweden stayed with us and could already speak 4-5 languages at age 12 or so.

Most Canadians speak 1 or 2.

Yup, born in germany, german descent.

Most europeans speak 2 languages, some even more. The dutch are often fluent in english and german, the belges speak dutch, french and english.

the french speak french.  ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 09:42:37 AM
You look good and can destroy Sevas mercilessly.

Im sure most people here could if they stayed on Test for 3 years straight and ate d-bols and abombs like tic tacs like sevestase has.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 09:43:45 AM
Yup, born in germany, german descent.

Most europeans speak 2 languages, some even more. The dutch are often fluent in english and german, the belges speak dutch, french and english.

the french speak french.  ;D

So French people from France are stubborn to learn new languages?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 09:45:16 AM
Im sure most people here could if they stayed on Test for 3 years straight and ate d-bols and abombs like tic tacs like sevestase has.

with average genetics, even not training at all would have better results with these amounts of roids.

So French people from France are stubborn to learn new languages?

stubborn or dumb, i don't know.  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: kyomu on February 06, 2008, 09:46:59 AM
Im sure most people here could if they stayed on Test for 3 years straight and ate d-bols and abombs like tic tacs like sevestase has.
But You are natural now arent you? And still look good.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Stavios on February 06, 2008, 09:48:06 AM
et tu!

not 'est tu'



what the fuck are you talking about  ;D

he needs to say: Ça va bien, et toi ?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 09:51:03 AM
what the fuck are you talking about  ;D

he needs to say: Ça va bien, et toi ?

lol, you're right. i was aiming at the "est" so i overlooked that completely.

hey, je m'en fous. j'ai pas parlez francais pour 2 ans je pense.  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 09:56:25 AM
what the fuck are you talking about  ;D

he needs to say: Ça va bien, et toi ?


Yes in French I was a "C" student, but lived in Quebec for 9 months so that helped. My grammer is terrible and I often forget to make plurals, ect. Je nes pas parles Francais pour 2 au 3 ans.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 09:58:36 AM

Yes in French I was a "C" student, but lived in Quebec for 9 months so that helped. My grammer is terrible and I often forget to make plurals, ect. Je nes pas parles Francais pour 2 au 3 ans.

french sucks anyways.

there are better languages out there, like italian.

beautiful language.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: kyomu on February 06, 2008, 10:01:10 AM
french sucks anyways.

there are better languages out there, like italian.

beautiful language.
Yeah but sometime Italian sounds like joke even they are really pissed.Very funny.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 10:02:43 AM
with average genetics, even not training at all would have better results with these amounts of roids.

stubborn or dumb, i don't know.  ;D ;D


 Canada is 85% English so The French here are atleast forced understand it to some degree. In English Canada all signs and labels have to be written in both French and English, however in Quebec only French is necessary.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 10:03:23 AM
french sucks anyways.

there are better languages out there, like italian.

beautiful language.


Les cappice Italian?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 10:07:12 AM

Les cappice Italian?

do you mean 'capite l'italiano?'. if yes, then i say a bit.

don't know what 'les cappice italian' means.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mussolini on February 06, 2008, 10:11:51 AM
do you mean 'capite l'italiano?'. if yes, then i say a bit.

don't know what 'les cappice italiano' means.

Mi dispiachi, it means, "do you understand Italian", but I may have spelled something wrong. My Italian spelling and grammer is the same as my French, not very good.


I guess English is the only language I am fully literate in,
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: DK II on February 06, 2008, 10:15:15 AM
Mi dispiachi, it means, "do you understand Italian", but I may have spelled something wrong. My Italian spelling and grammer is the same as my French, not very good.


I guess English is the only language I am fully literate in,

i can't write italian very good, but can conversate some basic things. i want to learn some more in the future. I know some latin and spanish as well, so italian isn't really that hard to learn.  ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: The Master on February 06, 2008, 12:28:08 PM
Nice to see you hug and kiss. It is the will of Allah

Do you believe in allah and 72 virgons after blowing yourself up in a mall Bagdad Behzad?
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: The Master on February 06, 2008, 12:40:29 PM
I believe in money.


haha great answer, real freedom ;D
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: CigaretteMan on February 06, 2008, 12:48:22 PM
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.

2-Sevestase: Was on sustanon for 3 years straight and cycled d-bol and anadrol during that time, maxing out at 170 lbs at 15% bodyfat.

3- Billyguns: no need to explain his track record.


I vote for Harris as not only did he mega dose but he was so dedicated to his diet he would wake up twice a night to refuel with protien.


  Queen Tamali, no doubt. She takes 4 grams of test a week, 400 I.U of slim and 10 tabs of T3 and yet still manages to weight only a soft 246 lbs? give me a break!
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: WillGrant on December 26, 2008, 01:02:41 AM
monster bump
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Boost on December 26, 2008, 03:07:56 AM
John Romano hands down the worst bb genetics in history.

Taken every drug under the sun, good friends with another non-responder
Dan Douchaine.
Title: Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
Post by: Mars on December 26, 2008, 03:19:01 AM
i never understood why someone would continue using steroids if they came to the conclusion after one cycle they missed the genetics of a levrone. it must suck to have used everything under the sun and you still get owned by a natural.