Author Topic: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?  (Read 19844 times)

michael arvilla

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21923
  • facebook.com/michael.arvilla
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #25 on: February 05, 2008, 12:37:31 PM »
Arvilla hands down.  All heart but zero genetics...

"Heart" cant overcome "shitty genetics" but it can get you further than you ever dared dreamed.........


Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #26 on: February 05, 2008, 12:41:00 PM »
AND ANOTHER THING : WHY NONE OF U SHITTALKERS AKA MUSSOLINI ( WHO WAS GAY BY THE WAY  :o ) NEVER HAVE THE BALLS TO ENTER MR GETBIG3 ?....OR AT LEAST POST A PIC: IF U LOOOK AT LEAST AS BAD AS ME YOU WOULDN'T HAVE PROBLEMS POSTING IT RIGHT ? :D


HERE'S MUSOLINNI OFFSEASON....AND BELLOW RIGHT BEFORE HIS LATEST MMA FIGHT

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #27 on: February 05, 2008, 12:47:28 PM »
As you can see Sevastase, you weigh about as much as my right leg.

shotgun on the team

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #28 on: February 05, 2008, 12:49:54 PM »
As you can see Sevastase, you weigh about as much as my right leg.



ouch!

That must've hurt!

Right spermataster?

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #29 on: February 05, 2008, 12:51:55 PM »
ouch!

That must've hurt!

Right spermataster?

It would hurt if it was true.  However, from the pics they posted, they are pretty comparable.

medz zeppelin

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1540
  • go west young man.......break bread in the new lan
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #30 on: February 05, 2008, 12:53:24 PM »
funny shit...Goattail got the facts wrong.....here's me completely clean for over a year dieted down clean without aas at 185....this is the lowest I've ever been.....fact is : I LOOK BETTER CLEAN THAN ALL U BITCHES ON YOUR HEAVY UG LAB CYCLES. SIC ....GOATGIRL IS ANOTHER INTERNET JEALOUS BITCH WHO I'D LIKE TO NAME PRESIDENT OF MY FANCLUB.BY THE WAY : IF ANY OF U BITCHES POST A PIC JUICED OR NOT THAT BEATS ME ALL BOW FOREVA BEFORE U...BUT U ALL KNOW THAT WHEN IT COMES TO WHO LOOKS BETTER i'M MICHAEL JACKSON AND U ARE TITO'S. BIOTCH  ;D
this guys gonna fight Zito and Van Damm at the same time.......hey send me a tapout hat

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #31 on: February 05, 2008, 12:53:51 PM »
It would hurt if it was true.  However, from the pics they posted, they are pretty comparable.

give or take the 70 lbs I have on him, and that I havent juiced in almost 6 years.
shotgun on the team

nder98

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1846
  • Getlaid!
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #32 on: February 05, 2008, 12:56:16 PM »
King Kamali...aka 'nder98'.

 Billy Gunns doesn't count because it is obvious that the gang in NYC area sold him sterile seasme oil so technically he's never used real gear.

LMAO!!!! ;D ;D

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #33 on: February 05, 2008, 12:57:09 PM »
give or take the 70 lbs I have on him, and that I havent juiced in almost 6 years.

I have no reason to be biased here.  You look a bit heavier than Sevastee from the pics posted - about 15 lbs tops, most of which is probably bodyfat since he is leaner.  I dont know when Sevastee has juiced or not, but it doesn't really matter because most people lose most of what they gained shortly after they stop juicing.  I'm not trying to hate on you, just calling it like it is.  For you to make a thread and post Sevastee's name as though he has horrible genetics, you should have a pic that is MUCH better than his, not comparable as you've shown.

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #34 on: February 05, 2008, 01:00:11 PM »
I have no reason to be biased here.  You look a bit heavier than Sevastee from the pics posted - about 15 lbs tops, most of which is probably bodyfat since he is leaner.  I dont know when Sevastee has juiced or not, but it doesn't really matter because most people lose most of what they gained shortly after they stop juicing.  I'm not trying to hate on you, just calling it like it is.  For you to make a thread and post Sevastee's name as though he has horrible genetics, you should have a pic that is MUCH better than his, not comparable as you've shown.

Listen towel head, the thread says "worst genetics in response to gear".

Harris looks better than me in that pic to, but he has been on huge doses of gear for ten years.


if my thread was titled "best bodybuilding photos", you might have an argument.


The fact that Sevastase has run heavy cycles for years and looks similar to most natural guys is the point of my thread. Mabey I should type in arabic or punjabi so you can better understand.
shotgun on the team

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #35 on: February 05, 2008, 01:05:17 PM »
give or take the 70 lbs I have on him.
u got 70 lbs on me ? u trying to be a guido with that retarded haircut ?  :D

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #36 on: February 05, 2008, 01:06:39 PM »
Listen towel head, the thread says "worst genetics in response to gear".

Harris looks better than me in that pic to, but he has been on huge doses of gear for ten years.


if my thread was titled "best bodybuilding photos", you might have an argument.


The fact that Sevastase has run heavy cycles for years and looks similar to most natural guys is the point of my thread. Mabey I should type in arabic or punjabi so you can better understand.

Looks like someone is MELTING DOWN because he didnt get the response he was hoping for.  You are DELUSIONAL to make comments like, "I have 70 lbs over Sevastee" or to think you're even in a different league than him.  Fact is, anyone who is unbiased here like me (not a buddy towards you or Sevastee) will agree with me.  The only people who will agree with you are people who dont like Sevastee for the way he posts or the fact that he comes across as a picture whore.

Pazuzu

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 284
  • Getbig!
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #37 on: February 05, 2008, 01:07:25 PM »
Let's do the math:

late 1996-late 1997 = 1 year.
late 1999-early 2006 = close to 5 1/2 years.

Total time juicing: less than 7 years. Still a long time, but it's not ten.

I also didn't touch a drug until I was 27 years old.

Mussolini, you look about 22-24 and already juiced out of your mind. Am I right?

Also, my off-season weight when on was always around 230-240. Many, many people in the industry saw me this way and would laugh at your claim that I was hardly 200 pounds. I competed in shape at over 200 pounds about a half-dozen times.

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #38 on: February 05, 2008, 01:10:09 PM »
Your the first to say im in a different league than that bald guy.
shotgun on the team

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #39 on: February 05, 2008, 01:10:23 PM »
I have no reason to be biased here.  You look a bit heavier than Sevastee from the pics posted - about 15 lbs tops, most of which is probably bodyfat since he is leaner.  I dont know when Sevastee has juiced or not, but it doesn't really matter because most people lose most of what they gained shortly after they stop juicing.  I'm not trying to hate on you, just calling it like it is.  For you to make a thread and post Sevastee's name as though he has horrible genetics, you should have a pic that is MUCH better than his, not comparable as you've shown.
I did juiced and competed in the past....the pictures shown here on get big are all clean for at least a year....so basically he has never seen me juiced....also I want to know how this retard mausolini is heavier than me at 5'11" and 215 lbs in this picture...u trying to tell me he is 230 ?...and what ? 6'8" ?  :D

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16940
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #40 on: February 05, 2008, 01:10:29 PM »
1- Ron Harris: Recently admits to mega dosing with almost every bodybuilding drug under the sun for ten years, only to acheive the look of an average guy who works out 3-4 times a week.
Get real! Ron Harris looks better than the vast majority of gym rat juicers. That's a fact.

Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #41 on: February 05, 2008, 01:10:54 PM »
Why are you guys being mean to Ron?
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #42 on: February 05, 2008, 01:11:34 PM »
Let's do the math:

late 1996-late 1997 = 1 year.
late 1999-early 2006 = close to 5 1/2 years.

Total time juicing: less than 7 years. Still a long time, but it's not ten.

I also didn't touch a drug until I was 27 years old.

Mussolini, you look about 22-24 and already juiced out of your mind. Am I right?

Also, my off-season weight when on was always around 230-240. Many, many people in the industry saw me this way and would laugh at your claim that I was hardly 200 pounds. I competed in shape at over 200 pounds about a half-dozen times.


Im 26 and did one cycle of d's when I was 19 or 20. I get tested every 2-3 months.
shotgun on the team

ripitupbaby

  • Pros
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6952
  • 2010 Olympia Pro Powerlifting Champ
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #43 on: February 05, 2008, 01:14:56 PM »
Mussolini is looking quite delicious!

HI RON!!   :)

:)

Mussolini

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
  • riding shotgun on the team Nasser War wagon
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #44 on: February 05, 2008, 01:17:37 PM »
Looks like someone is MELTING DOWN because he didnt get the response he was hoping for.  You are DELUSIONAL to make comments like, "I have 70 lbs over Sevastee" or to think you're even in a different league than him.  Fact is, anyone who is unbiased here like me (not a buddy towards you or Sevastee) will agree with me.  The only people who will agree with you are people who dont like Sevastee for the way he posts or the fact that he comes across as a picture whore.


Not a melt down, I just cant justify having a civilized debate with someone of your kind. Its in your blood, to be uncivilized.
shotgun on the team

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #45 on: February 05, 2008, 01:20:09 PM »
you are 26...u are on a cycle and fatburners/t3 in that pic..your blod pressure is up from what I can see...u have shitty genetics from what I can tell and a bizarre frame...and with the risk of sounding conceited....I would be able to beat u in a bb competition easily even clean at 182-185 lbs...and u juiced at whatever weight u might be. any day sonny. U can also shut me up by entering mr getbig3.




AND ANOTHER THING : I BELIEVE I LOOK SHITTY AND HAVE MANY FLAWS BUT COMPARED TO U I THINK I'M FCUKING SHAWN RAY  ;)

phyxsius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6264
  • Mini Getbigger
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #46 on: February 05, 2008, 01:21:26 PM »
funny shit...Goattail got the facts wrong.....here's me completely clean for over a year dieted down clean without aas at 185....this is the lowest I've ever been.....fact is : I LOOK BETTER CLEAN THAN ALL U BITCHES ON YOUR HEAVY UG LAB CYCLES. SIC ....GOATGIRL IS ANOTHER INTERNET JEALOUS BITCH WHO I'D LIKE TO NAME PRESIDENT OF MY FANCLUB.BY THE WAY : IF ANY OF U BITCHES POST A PIC JUICED OR NOT THAT BEATS ME ALL BOW FOREVA BEFORE U...BUT U ALL KNOW THAT WHEN IT COMES TO WHO LOOKS BETTER i'M MICHAEL JACKSON AND U ARE TITO'S. BIOTCH  ;D

meltdown
I am a mini beast

FullROM

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 733
  • GetBig
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #47 on: February 05, 2008, 01:21:26 PM »
As you can see Sevastase, you weigh about as much as my right leg.



Monster waist

DK II

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31269
  • Call me 4 steroids: 571-332-2588 or 571-249-4163
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #48 on: February 05, 2008, 01:22:41 PM »
you are 26...u are on a cycle and fatburners/t3 in that pic..your blod pressure is up from what I can see...u have shitty genetics from what I can tell and a bizarre frame...and with the risk of sounding conceited....I would be able to beat u in a bb competition easily even clean at 182-185 lbs...and u juiced at whatever weight u might be. any day sonny. U can also shut me up by entering mr getbig3.




AND ANOTHER THING : I BELIEVE I LOOK SHITTY AND HAVE MANY FLAWS BUT COMPARED TO U I THINK I'M FCUKING SHAWN RAY  ;)

brutal insecurity issues.

Cleanest Natural

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 28661
  • Diet first, all else second
Re: Worst Genetics for gear, who's your pick?
« Reply #49 on: February 05, 2008, 01:26:01 PM »
Monster waist
I'D SAY HE IS DEFINATELY MORE GIFTED THAN ME ....TO BEAR A CHILD PERHAPS....NICE CLEPSIDRA ( HOURGLASS ) SHAPE....WIDE HIPS...DEF A NATURAL EXIT ( NO NEED FOR C SECTION ON THIS MERMAID )  :D