Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on July 24, 2008, 11:28:52 AM

Title: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on July 24, 2008, 11:28:52 AM
Beast.



115kg powerjerk

\

Discussssssssssss
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 11:38:07 AM
now that's what I call a woman right there.

feminine yet powerful.

Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 11:38:30 AM
253lb correct?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: dr.chimps on July 24, 2008, 11:38:45 AM
Beast.

Discussssssssssss
:o
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on July 24, 2008, 11:39:58 AM
253lb correct?

Yes, on the jerk.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 11:42:14 AM
excellent squats. I thought I had pretty good damn form but that was damn near perfect. No sumo, no extra width...all a$$ and thighs powering out each rep....damn
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Brutal_1 on July 24, 2008, 11:45:15 AM
now that's what I call a woman right there.

feminine yet powerful.




She's a cutie too  8)

Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 11:52:29 AM

She's a cutie too  8)



yes she is very cute. That's right up K-1's alley right there.

Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: JohnnyVegas on July 24, 2008, 12:00:31 PM
now that's what I call a woman right there.

feminine yet powerful.



Hell yeah!
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: triple_pickle on July 24, 2008, 12:06:33 PM
her knees go so much in, it hurts
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: LittleJ on July 24, 2008, 12:07:04 PM
holy smokes
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on July 24, 2008, 12:08:00 PM
her knees go so much in, it hurts

Hey I know you're upset that she's stronger than you but there's nothing wrong with her form.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: triple_pickle on July 24, 2008, 12:08:27 PM
Hey I know you're upset that she's stronger than you but there's nothing wrong with her form.

::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on July 24, 2008, 12:10:59 PM
::) ::) ::)

Her form is perfect, stop whining.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Fortress on July 24, 2008, 12:15:04 PM
That's fantastic. Very strong lady, no question. But her technique is not perfect. However, many Olympic lifters do ascend from a squat with that little knee-turn-in thingy. Never could understand why more don't experience knee problems because of it, either.   
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Camel Jockey on July 24, 2008, 12:15:20 PM
She is beautiful and also very charming

Watch her speak, she's such a sweetheart  :'(
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MAXX on July 24, 2008, 12:19:02 PM
nice. will go far in the olympics for sure.

cute to yes  :)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: triple_pickle on July 24, 2008, 12:20:35 PM
Her form is perfect, stop whining.
her ass clouds your judgment
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 12:24:09 PM
her ass clouds your judgment

reminds me of the song "never trust a big butt and a smile......that girl is poisooooon!"
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 12:24:17 PM
her ass clouds your judgment

Her form is just fine. Why are you bagging on her?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: triple_pickle on July 24, 2008, 12:25:51 PM
Her form is just fine. Why are you bagging on her?
whatever, not my knees
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: nukkaready on July 24, 2008, 12:27:27 PM
very impressive weight for such a sweet and cute lady... but she is taking extremely long breaks between all reps in the squat... and yes her technique is not the best... knees going inward on each rep.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 12:27:47 PM
whatever, not my knees

you know you'd lick ice cream off those knees if asked you.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 12:31:34 PM
very impressive weight for such a sweet and cute lady... but she is taking extremely long breaks between all reps in the squat... and yes her technique is not the best... knees going inward on each rep.

I don't see a problem with the rep time. When you can "control" weight you don't force your set through like most who do squats and can't handle the it. She obviously has MAX control of that weight...hence the grin while racking that ish with no prob after cranking out 10 slow ones

all power imo
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: kyomu on July 24, 2008, 12:32:24 PM
Wow This is a goddess!! :o
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: triple_pickle on July 24, 2008, 12:32:34 PM
you know you'd lick ice cream off those knees if asked you.
not only knees ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 12:33:31 PM
not only knees ;D ;D ;D

I'm miles ahead of ya. I promise.  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: nukkaready on July 24, 2008, 12:35:59 PM
I don't see a problem with the rep time. When you can "control" weight you don't force your set through like most who do squats and can't handle the it. She obviously has MAX control of that weight...hence the grin while racking that ish with no prob after cranking out 10 slow ones

all power imo

well... she wouldn't be able to get to 10 reps without those long breaks. That is obvious when you watch the clip. She is an Olympic lifter so it may be all good but from a bodybuilder's perspective the first 5-6 reps should have come more fluent.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: affy on July 24, 2008, 12:49:08 PM
i'd let her power jerk me
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 12:54:46 PM
Well, she's no olympic squatter but here's my Sophmore softball player from Long Beach St. 225x10 box squat. She weighs 120lb. Just came back from ACL reconstruction about 8 months ago.


(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0578.jpg)



(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: candidizzle on July 24, 2008, 12:55:37 PM
your cupping the bottom of her titties. nice.   ;D
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 12:59:52 PM
your cupping the bottom of her titties. nice.   ;D

LMAO....it's not like that in anyway shape or form.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MAXX on July 24, 2008, 01:01:14 PM
Well, she's no olympic squatter but here's my Sophmore softball player from Long Beach St. 225x10 box squat. She weighs 120lb. Just came back from ACL reconstruction about 8 months ago.


(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0578.jpg)



(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)
faaaar from the same good form as the olympic girl..
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: candidizzle on July 24, 2008, 01:01:39 PM
LMAO....it's not like that in anyway shape or form.
come on   !! you were gently circling around her nipples... i know it ,, dont lie coach,,,  :D
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: emn1964 on July 24, 2008, 01:03:06 PM
Wow This is a goddess!! :o

Kyomu, you do know that was a woman in that video, right?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: davidpaul on July 24, 2008, 01:04:05 PM
Well, she's no olympic squatter but here's my Sophmore softball player from Long Beach St. 225x10 box squat. She weighs 120lb. Just came back from ACL reconstruction about 8 months ago.


(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0578.jpg)



(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)

Why are you grabbing her tits if she can squat the weight on her own? ???
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 01:06:15 PM
Why are you grabbing her tits if she can squat the weight on her own? ???

LOL....I'm not. It was her last couple of reps.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: 20inch calves on July 24, 2008, 01:06:23 PM
good squat but her knees going in like that means that the inside of legs are weak...i think its the abductor
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 01:06:52 PM
come on   !! you were gently circling around her nipples... i know it ,, dont lie coach,,,  :D


lol
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: davidpaul on July 24, 2008, 01:07:20 PM
LOL....I'm not. It was her last couple of reps.

Were they firm?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 01:13:23 PM
good squat but her knees going in like that means that the inside of legs are weak...i think its the abductor

Could be a couple of things, yes the abductor, but also weak glutes and foot pronation when going up. As part of the warm up, I'll have my athletes use muscle activation.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: 20inch calves on July 24, 2008, 01:18:03 PM
Could be a couple of things, yes the abductor, but also weak glutes and foot pronation when going up. As part of the warm up, I'll have my athletes use muscle activation.

by the looks of glutes they aren't weak :D
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: burn2live on July 24, 2008, 01:26:50 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Method101 on July 24, 2008, 02:00:16 PM
good work coach, the bar is resting way to high on her fucking back. its on her neck lol.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 02:05:45 PM
good work coach, the bar is resting way to high on her fucking back. its on her neck lol.

lol...I can't lie I noticed that too on that second shot. LOL ...damn coach. LOL.

Girl: "Is my neck supposed to hurt like this?"
Coach: "You're doing fine...keep pushin!"

LMAO...sorry coach HAD to get ya.  ;)

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: davidpaul on July 24, 2008, 02:07:21 PM
lol...I can't lie I noticed that too on that second shot. LOL ...damn coach. LOL.

Girl: "Is my neck supposed to hurt like this?"
Coach: "You're doing fine...keep pushin!"

LMAO...sorry coach HAD to get ya.  ;)

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)

Like hes noticing that, hes busy grabbing a whole of those pert college titties.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: CAPTAIN INSANO on July 24, 2008, 02:11:11 PM
Like hes noticing that, hes busy grabbing a whole of those pert college titties.

Then she probably threw a dip in between her toes post-work-out... :-*

Impressive lift nonetheless....
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 02:11:20 PM
Like hes noticing that, hes busy grabbing a whole of those pert college titties.

correction

girl: "Are you grabbing my tits coach?"
coach: "you're doing fine...just keep pushin!"

...ok coach i'm done now. LOL
(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: musclehedz on July 24, 2008, 02:12:49 PM
ALL DRUGS
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Overload on July 24, 2008, 02:15:53 PM
That's hot.

8)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: _bruce_ on July 24, 2008, 02:20:02 PM
Cute
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: affy on July 24, 2008, 02:22:19 PM
Well, she's no olympic squatter but here's my Sophmore softball player from Long Beach St. 225x10 box squat. She weighs 120lb. Just came back from ACL reconstruction about 8 months ago.


(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0578.jpg)



(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)

bar is way to high on her back and you can clearly see that she's on the tip of her toes from the second picture

great "personal training" there Coach
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 24, 2008, 02:24:22 PM
:o

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=225511.0;attach=264110;image)

2 of your patients? ;D
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Fortress on July 24, 2008, 02:24:59 PM
The bar's on her neck (way too high); the box is higher than the CN Tower; and the thrust is coming off the balls of her feet. Nice work.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Brutal_1 on July 24, 2008, 03:01:40 PM



Seriously, why HEAVY box squats on a 10th grade chick?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Method101 on July 24, 2008, 03:02:35 PM
she cant lift that weight. Bird LEgs. Coach you are a joke.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 03:03:31 PM
Oh boy, here comes the experts. Ok, so here goes clowns. Since she had ACL surgery, I WILL NOT have her do a touch and go box squat. Goes down, sits rolls front pelvic tilt and back up. Tempo is 4-0-0-1. One- doing that way builds explosive strength, the front pelvic tilt strengens hip flexors and low back, the pause on the bottom (sitting on the box) saves her knees by taking stress off.

Also, doing that way the bar is NOT that high. Schools out. Make sure to do your homework tonight. Especially before making naive comments like that. It's not olympic lifting or bodybuilding.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Brutal_1 on July 24, 2008, 03:05:03 PM
Oh boy, here comes the experts. Ok, so here goes clowns. Since she had ACL surgery, I WILL NOT have her do a touch and go box squat. Goes down, sits rolls front pelvic tilt and back up. Tempo is 4-0-0-1. One- doing that way builds explosive strength, the front pelvic tilt strengens hip flexors and low back, the pause on the bottom (sitting on the box) saves her knees by taking stress off.

Also, doing that way the bar is NOT that high. Schools out. Make sure to do your homework tonight. Especially before making naive comments like that. It's not olympic lifting or bodybuilding.

Coach, this is one of the clowns...I take it you don't buy into the whole NASM position on squats then?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Brutal_1 on July 24, 2008, 03:06:59 PM
Oh boy, here comes the experts. Ok, so here goes clowns. Since she had ACL surgery, I WILL NOT have her do a touch and go box squat. Goes down, sits rolls front pelvic tilt and back up. Tempo is 4-0-0-1. One- doing that way builds explosive strength, the front pelvic tilt strengens hip flexors and low back, the pause on the bottom (sitting on the box) saves her knees by taking stress off.

Also, doing that way the bar is NOT that high. Schools out. Make sure to do your homework tonight. Especially before making naive comments like that. It's not olympic lifting or bodybuilding.


Then why the hell did you put it in a thread about a female olympic lifter  ::)  ::)  ::)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 03:09:03 PM
Dunno what that protcol is.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Method101 on July 24, 2008, 03:09:22 PM

Also, doing that way the bar is NOT that high. Schools out. Make sure to do your homework tonight. Especially before making naive comments like that. It's not olympic lifting or bodybuilding.
(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)
the bar dont get any higher than that you stupid prick, look at her legs, somone who squats 225x10 properly should have far bigger legs than that, even when doing box squats, she shouldnt be pushing off her toes, coach you are a slimeball.

Its also clear she dosent know what the fuck shes doing by looking at her fucking pathetic body she has attained through your methods.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 03:17:55 PM
She's not pushing off he toes dick head, if she was doing that she couldnt do 1 let alone 10. Also "Methodfag" she's a centerfielder throwing all the time. If the bar was down any lower it would cause too much stress by externally rotating cause undue stress on her rotator cuff or labrum. If she wasnt for that, then yes, it would be a little lower.
Have you ever tried squatting with a shoulder injury. Think a little clown!
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 24, 2008, 03:21:39 PM
(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/DSCN0577.jpg)
the bar dont get any higher than that you stupid prick, look at her legs, somone who squats 225x10 properly should have far bigger legs than that, even when doing box squats, she shouldnt be pushing off her toes, coach you are a slimeball.

Its also clear she dosent know what the fuck shes doing by looking at her fucking pathetic body she has attained through your methods.

Fucking moron. She's an athlete, she's not lifting to get a great looking body.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Brutal_1 on July 24, 2008, 03:23:05 PM
Fucking moron. She's an athlete, she's not lifting to get a great looking body.

since when is that an excuse for doing dangerous exercises while being injured  ::)

stick to "racial science" and spaceships DEbutthole  ;)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 24, 2008, 03:24:42 PM
since when is that an excuse for doing dangerous exercises while being injured  ::)

stick to "racial science" and spaceships DEbutthole  ;)

debussey was writing a response to "Moron101" and his argument about her body, when she is an athlete lifting for performances sake.

And Coach might be a moron, but he knows what he = talking about when it comes to training.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Brutal_1 on July 24, 2008, 03:25:54 PM
debussey was writing a response to "Moron101" and his argument about her body, when she is an athlete lifting for performances sake.

And Coach might be a moron, but he knows what he = talking about when it comes to training.
;)


lets not forget the original purpose for this thread...the squatting hottie  ;D
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Method101 on July 24, 2008, 03:26:41 PM
Fucking moron. She's an athlete, she's not lifting to get a great looking body.
If you do 225x10 your legs should be bigger than that, i dont give a fuck if your trying to look good or not.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 24, 2008, 03:26:44 PM
;)


lets not forget the original purpose for this thread...the squatting hottie  ;D


She is fucking hot. For once, somewhat bigger shapes suits a woman.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 03:26:46 PM
LOL....thanks debussy..I think!
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 24, 2008, 03:27:22 PM
If you do 225x10 your legs should be bigger than that, i dont give a fuck if your trying to look good or not.

Why?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Method101 on July 24, 2008, 03:29:43 PM
debussey was writing a response to "Moron101" and his argument about her body, when she is an athlete lifting for performances sake.

And Coach might be a moron, but he knows what he = talking about when it comes to training.
Debussey you have just exposed yourself as a complete fucking lunatic.

I dont care how painfull your shoulders are, you dont rest the bar on your neck, you avoid the fucking squat completly, the exercise is obviously doing nothing for her legs anyway.

Being an "Athlete" and having a athletic body go hand in hand, i know women who never trained a day in their fucking life with bigger legs than this bitch. She deserves to be called a bitch because she is being trained by "Coach".

Btw Looking thin on top Coach, good luck with that. 8)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: K-1 on July 24, 2008, 03:29:50 PM
;)


lets not forget the original purpose for this thread...the squatting hottie  ;D

damn str8. fine as all outdoors
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: QuakerOats on July 24, 2008, 03:30:52 PM
Debussey you have just exposed yourself as a complete fucking lunatic.

I dont care how painfull your shoulders are, you dont rest the bar on your neck, you avoid the fucking squat completly, the exercise is obviously doing nothing for her legs anyway.

Being an "Athlete" and having a athletic body go hand in hand, i know women who never trained a day in their fucking life with bigger legs than this bitch. She deserves to be called a bitch because she is being trained by "Coach".

Btw Looking thin on top Coach, good luck with that. 8)
::)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 03:31:08 PM
Brutal not knowing WTF your talking about "method". Why would I want a performance athlete or almost any athlete to have big legs?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Method101 on July 24, 2008, 03:33:11 PM
Brutal not knowing WTF your talking about "method". Why would I want a performance athlete or almost any athlete to have big legs?
::) ::) Its impossible to gain strength without any increase in muscle size.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: QuakerOats on July 24, 2008, 03:33:24 PM
coach obviously knows what he's doing judging by the older pictures of him, i'm sure he gets great results for his clients, nothing wrong at all with that girl's form.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: 20inch calves on July 24, 2008, 03:34:46 PM
She's not pushing off he toes dick head, if she was doing that she couldnt do 1 let alone 10. Also "Methodfag" she's a centerfielder throwing all the time. If the bar was down any lower it would cause too much stress by externally rotating cause undue stress on her rotator cuff or labrum. If she wasnt for that, then yes, it would be a little lower.
Have you ever tried squatting with a shoulder injury. Think a little clown!

first of all it does look like she is pushing with her toes..you probably couldn;t see that from where you were spotting so i can;t fault you couldn;t see it but she is

secondly i don;t understand why you don;t have have her doing hacks or leg presses to keep pressure off her shoulder after all having the bar so high puts added stress on her lower back
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Method101 on July 24, 2008, 03:35:52 PM
coach obviously knows what he's doing judging by the older pictures of him, i'm sure he gets great results for his clients, nothing wrong at all with that girl's form.
Nice you just took a shot at him for me.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 24, 2008, 03:36:14 PM
Debussey you have just exposed yourself as a complete fucking lunatic.

I dont care how painfull your shoulders are, you dont rest the bar on your neck, you avoid the fucking squat completly, the exercise is obviously doing nothing for her legs anyway.

Being an "Athlete" and having a athletic body go hand in hand, i know women who never trained a day in their fucking life with bigger legs than this bitch. She deserves to be called a bitch because she is being trained by "Coach".

Btw Looking thin on top Coach, good luck with that. 8)

Your squat argument is worthless. You are not bringing any substancive evidence to the table, you are making a statement without backing it up.

Being an athlete and the size of your legs has nothing to do with eachother from a performance point of view given that your strengh is there.. and:  Her strength is there, and the smaller legs might even be an advantage. Also, strength and size does not correlate very strongly, thus, what the hell are you babbling about? Your own opinion that a strong and athletic girl should have some size on her legs? Oh, and "an athletic body" does not mean "big leggs".

All you have done is writing your irrational personal beliefs without anything to back it up so the implications of your beliefs makes sense from a rational point of view. You are basically argumenting like a 10 year old.

You = a class1 moron. Brutal 85 IQ.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: QuakerOats on July 24, 2008, 03:43:01 PM
Nice you just took a shot at him for me.
he also looked great in the pictures of that show he did last year as well, better than you've ever looked for sure.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: dogbowl on July 24, 2008, 03:44:44 PM
squatting 322 for 10 is impressive

not being able to count to 10 on her own ...  not so much
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 03:45:14 PM
None of my athletes perform little if any machine work. Those are simple non functional movements. With my lower body protocols most all for the first exercise being closed chain (front squats, back squats, DB squats etc) the rest is 1-2 unilateral exercises followed by posterior chain work. Thats basically on the power phase of the periodization.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: 20inch calves on July 24, 2008, 03:54:04 PM
None of my athletes perform little if any machine work. Those are simple non functional movements. With my lower body protocols most all for the first exercise being closed chain (front squats, back squats, DB squats etc) the rest is 1-2 unilateral exercises followed by posterior chain work. Thats basically on the power phase of the periodization.


why? i understand you want functional movements but some hack machines are just as good as the squat with less stress on the lower back. muscle performance comes from muscle stimulation so what does it matter
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: candidizzle on July 24, 2008, 03:55:10 PM
for athletic purpouses it only makes sense to focus on free weight compound movements.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 24, 2008, 03:55:18 PM

why? i understand you want functional movements but some hack machines are just as good as the squat with less stress on the lower back. muscle performance comes from muscle stimulation so what does it matter


Because balancing the free weights might give some benefit for athletes?

Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: QuakerOats on July 24, 2008, 03:56:55 PM
i'm starting to get some bicep tendonitis from holding the squat bar Coach, what should i do?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: 20inch calves on July 24, 2008, 04:16:38 PM

Because balancing the free weights might give some benefit for athletes?





i suppose so. but if he is worried about her shoulders being put in an awkward position why wouldn;t he worry about her look back which is very vunerable in the squat with the bar being so high
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Zaphod on July 24, 2008, 04:23:21 PM

She's a cutie too  8)



HOLY FUCKING CHRIST that is one hot sista!  :o
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Camel Jockey on July 24, 2008, 04:35:48 PM
Stop hijacking this fucking thread you HRT abusing homo pervert

Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 05:13:27 PM

why? i understand you want functional movements but some hack machines are just as good as the squat with less stress on the lower back. muscle performance comes from muscle stimulation so what does it matter

Doing the box squat the way I explained actually takes the stress of the low back more than you might think.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: warrior_code on July 24, 2008, 05:23:26 PM
There is a relationship between size and strength, but it is not a direct one.  World class javelin thrower Andreas benching 400 lbs with 12 inch arms. 

Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 24, 2008, 06:08:07 PM


i suppose so. but if he is worried about her shoulders being put in an awkward position why wouldn;t he worry about her look back which is very vunerable in the squat with the bar being so high

I'm not so worried about her shoulders unless she has a shoulder problem (she doesn't) what I don't want to do is to create the problem by having the bar drop so low that it causes unwanted external rotation..

Now on the hacks. Let me see if I an explain this right. My personal feeling on hacks is it's great for bodybuilding and aesthetics but absolutely horrible for athletes. If you take a look at the mechanics of a hack squat on the 1/2 way down position or about a 30 degree angle, IN MY OPINION because of the patella being floating, and the femur tibia and fibula being help together with legiments (LCL, MCL) the sheer force of it in that position would more or less cause the femur to more or less "slide" from the tibia and cause damage to the LCL and MCL or the patella tendon. Make sense?

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/kneeanatomy-1.jpg)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: 20inch calves on July 24, 2008, 06:15:56 PM
I'm not so worried about her shoulders unless she has a shoulder problem (she doesn't) what I don't want to do is to create the problem by having the bar drop so low that it causes unwanted external rotation..

Now on the hacks. Let me see if I an explain this right. My personal feeling on hacks is it's great for bodybuilding and aesthetics but absolutely horrible for athletes. If you take a look at the mechanics of a hack squat on the 1/2 way down position or about a 30 degree angle, IN MY OPINION because of the patella being floating, and the femur tibia and fibula being help together with legiments (LCL, MCL) the sheer force of it in that position would more or less cause the femur to more or less "slide" from the tibia and cause damage to the LCL and MCL or the patella tendon. Make sense?

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/kneeanatomy-1.jpg)


so i suppose wrapping your knees while doing hack squats would be a no no
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: knny187 on July 24, 2008, 06:39:34 PM
bar is way to high on her back and you can clearly see that she's on the tip of her toes from the second picture

great "personal training" there Coach

I was just going to say the same thing

she's clearly on her toes
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: knny187 on July 24, 2008, 06:42:48 PM
Beast.



Discussssssssssss

Surprised nobody caught this......

but the bar she's using is helping to assist coming out


Granted...even with the bar assist...it's a good lift. 
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Devon97 on July 24, 2008, 06:58:08 PM
her knees go so much in, it hurts

EXACTLY. Very good depth but awfull form. Weak hips. THis could be resolved by doing box squats.

I truely question if some on this board even lift weights based soley on the remarks they make trying to validate the form others use.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: dr.chimps on July 24, 2008, 07:00:19 PM
Brutal not knowing WTF your talking about "method". Why would I want a performance athlete or almost any athlete to have big legs?
I'm thinking power. Duh.

/not exagerrated bb'ing huge, tho!
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: dr.chimps on July 24, 2008, 07:03:12 PM
I'm not so worried about her shoulders unless she has a shoulder problem (she doesn't) what I don't want to do is to create the problem by having the bar drop so low that it causes unwanted external rotation..

Now on the hacks. Let me see if I an explain this right. My personal feeling on hacks is it's great for bodybuilding and aesthetics but absolutely horrible for athletes. If you take a look at the mechanics of a hack squat on the 1/2 way down position or about a 30 degree angle, IN MY OPINION because of the patella being floating, and the femur tibia and fibula being help together with legiments (LCL, MCL) the sheer force of it in that position would more or less cause the femur to more or less "slide" from the tibia and cause damage to the LCL and MCL or the patella tendon. Make sense?
Hey Coach, given what you said above, what are your thoughts regarding any kind of thigh extension work, especially heavy stuff?
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Devon97 on July 24, 2008, 07:06:45 PM
She's not pushing off he toes dick head, if she was doing that she couldnt do 1 let alone 10. Also "Methodfag" she's a centerfielder throwing all the time. If the bar was down any lower it would cause too much stress by externally rotating cause undue stress on her rotator cuff or labrum. If she wasnt for that, then yes, it would be a little lower.
Have you ever tried squatting with a shoulder injury. Think a little clown!

Coach,

if she has shoulder issues then a cambered bar or safety squat bar would be alot better.

Also I know you follow Westside however Louis Simmons coaches his lifters to sit back MUCH further onto the box. Her heels are off the ground and her knees are WAYYYY to far forward. Both a huge no no. I would also drop the box to parallel.
You know I love you, Im just calling it like I see it.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Devon97 on July 24, 2008, 07:08:34 PM
good squat but her knees going in like that means that the inside of legs are weak...i think its the abductor

You have it backwards.
the abductors are on the outside of the hip, Therefore if you have weak abductors it means you have weak hips, and it leads to the knees "pinching in".

adductors are on the inside.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Devon97 on July 24, 2008, 07:15:54 PM

why? i understand you want functional movements but some hack machines are just as good as the squat with less stress on the lower back. muscle performance comes from muscle stimulation so what does it matter

Your not  serious are? I hope for your sake you never EVER speak with authority on training athletes.

 A machine has a FIXED range of motion = loss of coordination.

 A maching does NOT teach you to absorb force.

 Never understood the "stress on low back" theory? Thats one of the amazing qualities of squats , the aspect of spinal loading.

Muscle performance DOES NOT come from muscle stimulation. 

Muscle Performance comes from the nervous system.

 

 


Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 25, 2008, 07:25:00 AM
Coach,

if she has shoulder issues then a cambered bar or safety squat bar would be alot better.Also I know you follow Westside however Louis Simmons coaches his lifters to sit back MUCH further onto the box. Her heels are off the ground and her knees are WAYYYY to far forward. Both a huge no no. I would also drop the box to parallel.
You know I love you, Im just calling it like I see it.

I agree, but at that gym we don't have either. But at MetRx we do have a safety bar. When we took those pics, it was an 18" box, we're below parallell now.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MAXX on July 25, 2008, 08:09:37 AM
There is a relationship between size and strength, but it is not a direct one.  World class javelin thrower Andreas benching 400 lbs with 12 inch arms. 


monster chest bounce. smart way to tear a pec.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: affy on July 25, 2008, 08:16:59 AM
monster chest bounce. smart way to tear a pec.

and completely shatter your sternum

looks like his spotter went to "The Coach" Personal Training Academy
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: JohnnyVegas on July 25, 2008, 08:26:24 AM
monster chest bounce. smart way to tear a pec.

A little bit of a bounce-but a good lift for such a small kid-that looked like some serious weight!
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 25, 2008, 02:39:05 PM
monster chest bounce. smart way to tear a pec.


and completely shatter your sternum

looks like his spotter went to "The Coach" Personal Training Academy


So what? He still moves weight you guys could only dream of. Some bouncing don't take anything away from the fact that the kid has amazing strenght.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MONSTER_TRICEPS on July 25, 2008, 02:44:11 PM


So what? He still moves weight you guys could only dream of. Some bouncing don't take anything away from the fact that the kid has amazing strenght.

QFT.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: 20inch calves on July 25, 2008, 03:10:27 PM
Your not  serious are? I hope for your sake you never EVER speak with authority on training athletes.

 A machine has a FIXED range of motion = loss of coordination.

 A maching does NOT teach you to absorb force.

 Never understood the "stress on low back" theory? Thats one of the amazing qualities of squats , the aspect of spinal loading.

Muscle performance DOES NOT come from muscle stimulation. 

Muscle Performance comes from the nervous system.

 

 







first off i never said i trained athletes. i have trained middle aged housewives but i don't train anybody but myself anymore. i don't appreciate your attack though. i guarantee i look better than you ;)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 25, 2008, 04:10:50 PM



first off i never said i trained athletes. i have trained middle aged housewives but i don't train anybody but myself anymore. i don't appreciate your attack though. i guarantee i look better than you ;)

In all fairness, Devon97 knows his shit when it comes to training athletes and looks the part. He not a bodybuilder, but is in awesome shape.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: JohnnyVegas on July 25, 2008, 04:49:04 PM



first off i never said i trained athletes. i have trained middle aged housewives but i don't train anybody but myself anymore. i don't appreciate your attack though. i guarantee i look better than you ;)

Would you train a fat BBer like squad father???? 
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: elite_lifter on July 25, 2008, 04:50:07 PM
Would you train a fat BBer like squad father???? 
Pot calling the kettle black. ::)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: JohnnyVegas on July 25, 2008, 04:51:18 PM
Pot calling the kettle black. ::)

Same could be said for you Elite!  ;D

You're no Mr. California!
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: 20inch calves on July 25, 2008, 05:01:12 PM
In all fairness, Devon97 knows his shit when it comes to training athletes and looks the part. He not a bodybuilder, but is in awesome shape.


thats fine but this is a discussion forum. just because i have an opinion on something doesn't mean he can say what he wants and expect me not to say something back. i am glad is so knowledgeable on training after all thats why i am here...to learn something.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 25, 2008, 05:05:56 PM
Same could be said for you Elite!  ;D

You're no Mr. California!
Menudo
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: JohnnyVegas on July 25, 2008, 05:11:47 PM

thats fine but this is a discussion forum. just because i have an opinion on something doesn't mean he can say what he wants and expect me not to say something back. i am glad is so knowledgeable on training after all thats why i am here...to learn something.

20 inchecalves-where are yo a trainer at??? And is that your full time job???
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Zaphod on July 25, 2008, 05:15:31 PM
The only thing that matters is how hot she is.


Hope that helps.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: PANDAEMONIUM on July 26, 2008, 12:43:12 AM
The only thing that matters is how hot she is.


Hope that helps.

The legendary zaphod layin' down the smack ;D
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Parker on July 26, 2008, 01:09:51 AM
Beast.



115kg powerjerk

\

Discussssssssssss

Anybody notice she got a phat booty, and some thick thighs...She's got to be like 4'11 or 5'1, she looks really petite

And for those complaining about her rep speed, here she is doing 297

Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: Devon97 on July 26, 2008, 05:26:45 AM

thats fine but this is a discussion forum. just because i have an opinion on something doesn't mean he can say what he wants and expect me not to say something back. i am glad is so knowledgeable on training after all thats why i am here...to learn something.

20inch calves ,

When you say something outrageous like an athlete should do legpress or hack squats be prepared to give a reason why.
For example when I say that legpress and hack squat are awfull for an athlete I can give several correct reasons why.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: MAXX on July 26, 2008, 06:40:34 AM


So what? He still moves weight you guys could only dream of. Some bouncing don't take anything away from the fact that the kid has amazing strenght.
translation = you use the same bouncy crap form ;)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Master on July 26, 2008, 09:04:10 AM
translation = my name is MAXX and I dislocated my shoulder and snapped 10 ribs while attempting 365 ;)

 :)
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: TrapsMcLats on July 26, 2008, 09:55:28 AM
she has great form, but her knees at the bottom of the lift worry me, last time i saw a girl with knees that reacted like that, a torn up knee soon followed. Women are predisposed to acl injuries becaue their hamstring:quad strength ratio is more even than males, anterior drawer slides  forward and POP goes the ACL (or something like that... sports med was a long time ago).
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: The Coach on July 26, 2008, 10:07:29 AM
she has great form, but her knees at the bottom of the lift worry me, last time i saw a girl with knees that reacted like that, a torn up knee soon followed. Women are predisposed to acl injuries becaue their hamstring:quad strength ratio is more even than males, anterior drawer slides  forward and POP goes the ACL (or something like that... sports med was a long time ago).

Hormone cycles are a cause of alot of it.
Title: Re: Girl backsquatting 322 for 10
Post by: TrapsMcLats on July 26, 2008, 10:22:48 AM
Hormone cycles are a cause of alot of it.

thats really interesting actually and it makes sense too.  god i am glad to not be a woman! ;)