Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on September 17, 2008, 08:03:38 AM

Title: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 17, 2008, 08:03:38 AM
In which picture Dorian legs look in a better condition??..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: m8 on September 17, 2008, 08:05:17 AM
Most dominant bodybuilder of all time with Arnold.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Noel Fuller on September 17, 2008, 08:05:57 AM
right pic but the left one is out of focus
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: QuakerOats on September 17, 2008, 08:12:13 AM
it's the same picture just in a different hue.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Noel Fuller on September 17, 2008, 08:13:05 AM
nope floor is different as are the trunks
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 17, 2008, 08:14:57 AM
it's the same picture just in a different hue.

No man u r wrong.. Any one who knws Dorian well will knw from which contest each pic. is..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: polychronopolous on September 17, 2008, 08:16:54 AM
Certain peoples lives consists of logging on to this website, day in and day out, comparing basically three mens bodies (Coleman, Nasser, and Dorian).
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: dyslexic on September 17, 2008, 08:16:54 AM
You tell me

(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x263/timeamajorova/dorleg.jpg)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: QuakerOats on September 17, 2008, 08:20:14 AM
No man u r wrong.. Any one who knws Dorian well will knw from which contest each pic. is..
::)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: bigbobs on September 17, 2008, 08:24:37 AM
In which picture Dorian legs package look bigger in a better condition??..

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=234782.0;attach=274796;image)

Fixed
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: burn2live on September 17, 2008, 08:28:06 AM
Look very similar. The first looks more out of focus, but cuts appear deeper, particularly at top. Why?
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: JasonH on September 17, 2008, 08:46:47 AM
Even though the first picture is out of focus I would still say that looks better.

As for which contest they're from, I doubt anyone is that anal about knowing.  ::)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Trev on September 17, 2008, 08:51:33 AM
Same condition. You can tell from the veins. Just different lighting. Left making them look better
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Grape Ape on September 17, 2008, 09:10:53 AM
Left looks like the coloring from '94.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Monster81 on September 17, 2008, 09:12:30 AM
both look good
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: polychronopolous on September 17, 2008, 09:13:08 AM
both look good
i see
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Barracuda on September 17, 2008, 11:30:20 AM
I guess this is leading up to the '97 Olympia...again ::)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Big Worm on September 17, 2008, 11:34:13 AM
No man u r wrong.. Any one who knws Dorian well will knw from which contest each pic. is..
Who the phuck stares at a mans legs ? I wouldn't be surprised if those ae Nassoils legs...
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: DeadSquatPress on September 17, 2008, 12:28:16 PM
calves look better in the right pic
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Mars on September 17, 2008, 12:36:30 PM
recognising the contest on the hand of bodyparts.
i need a vacation..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: SweetMuscles on September 17, 2008, 12:39:18 PM
Who the phuck stares at a mans legs ?

you. hence why you have 2,500 posts on a bodybuilding forum
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Dreadlord on September 17, 2008, 12:39:38 PM
recognising the contest on the hand of bodyparts.
i need a vacation..

Hah

I guess some people burn the midnight oil with a magnifying glass and a stack of FLEX so they can come up with this fascinating thread of mystery and intrigue ;D
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Big Worm on September 17, 2008, 01:13:37 PM
you. hence why you have 2,500 posts on a bodybuilding forum
With a name like Sweetmuscle..I can just imagine what "SWEET MUSCLE" you're referring to.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Dreadlord on September 17, 2008, 01:17:48 PM
With a name like Sweetmuscle..I can just imagine what "SWEET MUSCLE" you're referring to.

Hah

He posts 5 times as much a day than you and he thinks you post too much

sweetmuscles aka squad is a little retarded
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: HTexan on September 17, 2008, 01:18:48 PM
The one with the better tan.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: England_1 on September 17, 2008, 02:04:29 PM
Dorian's legs were just incredible. Absolutely masterful. Left is 1994. Right is 1993.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=234782.0;attach=274796;image)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: SweetMuscles on September 17, 2008, 02:19:56 PM
With a name like Sweetmuscle..I can just imagine what "SWEET MUSCLE" you're referring to.

seriously though, you say its gay to look at bodybuilding shots yet you cum here to look at bodybuilding shots.
it might be gay for you bro but not all of us.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 17, 2008, 05:40:54 PM
Who the phuck stares at a mans legs ? I wouldn't be surprised if those ae Nassoils legs...

No man u should knw the diff. between Dorian's legs and Nassers..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 17, 2008, 05:48:50 PM
Dorian's legs were just incredible. Absolutely masterful. Left is 1994. Right is 1993.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=234782.0;attach=274796;image)

Bravo u r right.. The intention of this thread is 2 show that Dorian's legs in 94 which is considerd as his worst shape ever (of course after 97) were still very good and at their best condition.. Even some ppl here said they were better than his legs in 93 which is considerd his best shape ever.. I am just wondering how to keep his legs at their best in 94 while failing 2 keep his upper body in the same condition.. May be his legs wre coming 2 shape b4 his upper body?!.. In 95 his legs were good but smaller and a little softer than bth 93 and 94..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: johnny1 on September 17, 2008, 05:51:09 PM
Outstanding Legs on Dorian, the pic on the left is 1994 Olympia photo-shoot the one on right is 1993 Olympia Photo-shoot.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 17, 2008, 05:53:24 PM
Bravo u r right.. The intention of this thread is 2 show that Dorian's legs in 94 which is considerd as his worst shape ever (of course after 97) were still very good and at their best condition.. Even some ppl here said they were better than his legs in 93 which is considerd his best shape ever.. I am just wondering how to keep his legs at their best in 94 while failing 2 keep his upper body in the same condition.. May be his legs wre coming 2 shape b4 his upper body?!.. In 95 his legs were good but smaller and a little softer than bth 93 and 94..
it's all lighting buddy don't get too excited  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 17, 2008, 05:56:11 PM
it's all lighting buddy don't get too excited  ;)

No man I have the videos of bth contests and noticed this long ago.. Check more pics. and u will see..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Big Worm on September 17, 2008, 08:33:37 PM
seriously though, you say its gay to look at bodybuilding shots yet you cum here to look at bodybuilding shots.
it might be gay for you bro but not all of us.
See Squabby..I come here to unwind ..Let loose on the Queer boys..I'm not into bodybuilding the way others(the phags) are. Like I would know to whom those legs b
elong to ?? Seriously... The gay community on this board grows by the day..It's pathetic ..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Big Worm on September 17, 2008, 08:35:42 PM
No man u should knw the diff. between Dorian's legs and Nassers..
Actually I don't..Nor do I care ..Doesn't make me, any more fortunate ..Or less fortunate(thank god).
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Wiggs on September 17, 2008, 08:37:38 PM
both look goodsuck

Fixed
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: SweetMuscles on September 17, 2008, 08:38:31 PM
See Squabby..I come here to unwind ..Let loose on the Queer boys..I'm not into bodybuilding the way others(the phags) are. Like I would know to whom those legs b
elong to ?? Seriously... The gay community on this board grows by the day..It's pathetic ..

yea right. another guy who claims that bodybuilding is gay yet is drawn to it like a moth to a flame. funny that most of your posts are about homsexuality and yet you deliberately come to a bodybuilding site and talk about bodybuilders like Nasser and Dorian whilst claiming it's gay.
epic closet case ;D
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Big Worm on September 17, 2008, 08:44:58 PM
yea right. another guy who claims that bodybuilding is gay yet is drawn to it like a moth to a flame. funny that most of your posts are about homsexuality and yet you deliberately come to a bodybuilding site and talk about bodybuilders like Nasser and Dorian whilst claiming it's gay.
epic closet case ;D
Sorry Squabby..Just because your sexuality is in question ..Don't confuse it with mine..I'm a man .. You looked at Nassoils physique and thought "man look at those Sweetmuscles" ..Hence your name...Don't confuse me with yourself..We're both men ..But I'm a different man from yourself..I'm the straight kind ..you ..well ..You know..?
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: SweetMuscles on September 17, 2008, 08:49:37 PM
Sorry Squabby..Just because your sexuality is in question ..Don't confuse it with mine..I'm a man .. You looked at Nassoils physique and thought "man look at those Sweetmuscles" ..Hence your name...Don't confuse me with yourself..We're both men ..But I'm a different man from yourself..I'm the straight kind ..you ..well ..You know..?

yea right. protesting your heterosexuality in meltdown form to anonymous strangers on a bodybuilding forum. hahahaha brutal insecurity  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Big Worm on September 17, 2008, 08:54:37 PM
yea right. protesting your heterosexuality in meltdown form to anonymous strangers on a bodybuilding forum. hahahaha brutal insecurity  ;D ;D ;D

HAHA! Insecurity? I've been here for yrs..You for wks.and you're already on your way to topping my posts...Who's melting? You're the one (Squabby) that made racist remarks about BAbu's nationality,black people and trailer parks ..And we know how that blew up in you face ..Yeah..I'm insecure. ::) ::)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: SweetMuscles on September 17, 2008, 09:05:20 PM
HAHA! Insecurity? I've been here for yrs..You for wks.and you're already on your way to topping my posts...Who's melting? You're the one (Squabby) that made racist remarks about BAbu's nationality,black people and trailer parks ..And we know how that blew up in you face ..Yeah..I'm insecure. ::) ::)

epic stalking of 2 year old posts . you say you come here to "unwind" yet all you do is look at nude men (and call that gay) and talk about nasser's underwear and call everyone else gay.
if you can't see the red flags everyone else can ;D
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 17, 2008, 09:44:32 PM
dorian legs look good in those close up shots.

problem is, as soon as he stands next to someone else (like Shawn) we quickly see that his quads, although massive, severely needed more cuts.

Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: willie mosconi on September 17, 2008, 09:46:50 PM
dorian legs look good in those close up shots.

problem is, as soon as he stands next to someone else (like Shawn) we quickly see that his quads, although massive, severely needed more cuts.



exactly true. Most of his top competitors had better legs
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 17, 2008, 09:49:43 PM
exactly true. Most of his top competitors had better legs

agreed.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: phemonmmill32 on September 17, 2008, 09:51:14 PM
calves looking strong in that pic but could've definately used more upper leg development in comparison to his competitiors
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: JohnnyVegas on September 17, 2008, 11:39:24 PM
epic stalking of 2 year old posts . you say you come here to "unwind" yet all you do is look at nude men (and call that gay) and talk about nasser's underwear and call everyone else gay.
if you can't see the red flags everyone else can ;D

Epic Squad  gimmick account denying his latent homosexual tendancies  :D
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 01:32:30 AM
dorian legs look good in those close up shots.

problem is, as soon as he stands next to someone else (like Shawn) we quickly see that his quads, although massive, severely needed more cuts.



Quote Ironaman Jan 1995 former IFBB Judge Roger Schwab 1994 Mr Olympia

" Best Legs - Yates from top to bottom "


This quote is directly from the 1994 Mr. Olympia and as usual you're always in direct opposition to what the judges think , the only muscle that Shawn has better is the rectus femoris , being the ignorant to anatomy and competitive bodybuilding no wonder why you have professional contest photographers calling you retard and your opinion never coincides with the IFBB judges

legs Hulkster from top to bottom , Rectus Femoris Vastus Lateralis (Externus) Vastus Intermedius Vastus Medialis (Internus) Sartorius , Tensor Fasciae Latae , Gastrocnemius  Medial Head , Lateral Head , Soleus , hamstrings ,  Biceps Femoris, Long Head ,  Biceps Femoris, Short Head ,  Semitendinosus , Semimembranosus

learn what ' legs ' before commenting on who has better legs. as usual IFBB judges own you and so do I  ;) countdown until Hulkster claims the judges are wrong again lol .....3.....2.....1....
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RZA on September 18, 2008, 02:52:23 AM
Dorian had great legs and calves. You have to be a hypocrit to say otherwise. That comparison is interesting once again, Sherief. I think that Dorian's conditioning is actually a bit better in '94 but he's a bit fuller in '93. Could be the lighting also. Very close though.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: johnny1 on September 18, 2008, 03:18:07 AM
Awesome shots ND, Dorian had Fantastic Thigh Rods, his hamstrings were awesome as well with size, hardness, seperation, dencity etc...and of course his Calves were more than likely the best set ever on a MR OLYMPIA CHAMPION.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: m8 on September 18, 2008, 03:23:46 AM
Let's not forget that calves are also a very important part of the "leg"
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RZA on September 18, 2008, 03:28:35 AM
Let's not forget that calves are also a very important part of the "leg"

Some will even go as far as to say that it's the lower part of the leg, right beneath the knee. But Ronnie's fans consider those people as lying bastards.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: m8 on September 18, 2008, 03:36:01 AM
Some will even go as far as to say that it's the lower part of the leg, right beneath the knee. But Ronnie's fans consider those people as lying bastards.

Ronnie had great quadriceps, but seriously, look at those twigs  ??? ???

(http://www.muscletime.com/gallery/d/20038-4/german-gp-1994-12.jpg?g2_GALLERYSID=546fdcadea9bb366eb4efce3b2d19d27)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 18, 2008, 03:43:15 AM
Quote
Quote Ironaman Jan 1995 former IFBB Judge Roger Schwab 1994 Mr Olympia

" Best Legs - Yates from top to bottom "


hey was this the same judge that claimed dorian's missing bi 'had no overall overall effect' LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 04:15:20 AM
Actually I don't..Nor do I care ..Doesn't make me, any more fortunate ..Or less fortunate(thank god).

So upon wht u base ur opinions??.. If you don't knw the diff. bet. the body of this guy and tht why do u keep criticizing one of them and praising the other all the time??.. I hope u dont base ur choice upon the nationality or the religion of each guy..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 04:23:13 AM
Dorian had great legs and calves. You have to be a hypocrit to say otherwise. That comparison is interesting once again, Sherief. I think that Dorian's conditioning is actually a bit better in '94 but he's a bit fuller in '93. Could be the lighting also. Very close though.

Even if it's the lighting,.. I don't want to show that his legs were better in 94 than in 93,.. no.. I just wanted to say that although he was off in 94 his legs were still on and can be compared to his legs in 93 which was his best shape ever.. In 95 his legs were a little smaller and ironically not as sharp as in 93 or 94..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 04:24:28 AM
Let's not forget that calves are also a very important part of the "leg"

Who said they r not :)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: m8 on September 18, 2008, 04:34:03 AM
Who said they r not :)

Hulkster and many others keep posting shots cut at the knee, so I assume they do, and for a very good reason since Ronnie had some of the worst calves ever seen in the pro ranks.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 04:37:23 AM
Hulkster and many others keep posting shots cut at the knee, so I assume they do.

4 me to have small thights and small calves is better thn having big thights and small calves..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RZA on September 18, 2008, 04:40:09 AM
Even if it's the lighting,.. I don't want to show that his legs were better in 94 than in 93,.. no.. I just wanted to say that although he was off in 94 his legs were still on and can be compared to his legs in 93 which was his best shape ever.. In 95 his legs were a little smaller and ironically not as sharp as in 93 or 94..

Do you have pics of '95?
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 04:44:23 AM
Do you have pics of '95?

I dont want 2 post a certain pic. coz if it's bad u may think this is only one pic. and is not enough to judge.. It's better to go to muscletime.com and see the gallery of Mr. O. 95.. Plz do tht and let me knw ur opinion..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RZA on September 18, 2008, 04:46:47 AM
I'll try to see if they have the video somewhere. I think I saw it a few times a while ago. I also felt that Dorian looked much more impressive on videos than on pics. And those who've seen him "live" say that he was even more impressive.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 05:00:02 AM
I'll try to see if they have the video somewhere. I think I saw it a few times a while ago. I also felt that Dorian looked much more impressive on videos than on pics. And those who've seen him "live" say that he was even more impressive.

Whn I first started training I had some magazines from where I knew Dorian and the others.. But I didn't knw how Dorian was clearly above the others till I watched the videos of Mr. Olympia 93, 94, and then 95.. I watched them all in their times (although it was very hard to obtain these videos in my country as they were not very popular).. On the youtube I watched some clips from Mr. O. 96 and 97 and for me Dorian lacked his earlier effect on the stage specially in 97..

Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Bear on September 18, 2008, 06:03:25 AM
Bravo u r right.. The intention of this thread is 2 show that Dorian's legs in 94 which is considerd as his worst shape ever (of course after 97) were still very good and at their best condition.. Even some ppl here said they were better than his legs in 93 which is considerd his best shape ever.. I am just wondering how to keep his legs at their best in 94 while failing 2 keep his upper body in the same condition.. May be his legs wre coming 2 shape b4 his upper body?!.. In 95 his legs were good but smaller and a little softer than bth 93 and 94..


Both sets of quads are relatively unimpressive by today's standards. Not much size and no striations. Good calves obviously though.


Haha, I bet ND or Suckmydick is gonna point out the exceptional sartorious development or some inane sh*t.

Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 06:06:33 AM

Both sets of quads are relatively unimpressive by today's standards. Not much size and no striations. Good calves obviously though.


Haha, I bet ND or Suckmydick is gonna point out the exceptional sartorious development or some inane sh*t.



2day's standards??? Do u mean that Jay's legs look better than Dorian's???.. No man no way..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: m8 on September 18, 2008, 06:14:58 AM
Both sets of quads are relatively unimpressive by today's standards.

You make it sound like today's competition is stronger than it was in the 90's  ???
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RZA on September 18, 2008, 06:48:19 AM
Yeah, today's standards are way higher than the '90s.  ::) A guy like Gustavo who finished 3rd twice would have barely cracked the top ten during Dorian's reign.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on September 18, 2008, 09:43:32 AM
2day's standards??? Do u mean that Jay's legs look better than Dorian's???.. No man no way..

Jay may not of had a better physique but his quadriceps are better than Dorians
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RZA on September 18, 2008, 09:47:58 AM
When did Jay show proper conditioning so we can verify your assesment? Ironman 2003? Since then, when? At least, Dorian's conditioning was never off.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 09:57:57 AM
When did Jay show proper conditioning so we can verify your assesment? Ironman 2003? Since then, when? At least, Dorian's conditioning was never off.

No Dorian was off on the famous day of 1997..
There is somethng wrong in Jay's quads, the right doesn't look like the left.. This is a comman thing among most of the other guys but wth Jay it's more abvious (same story wth his 2 biceps)..
The guy whose quads were really better than Dorian's was Nasser, his quads were biger and sharper.. I hope this wont start a new stupid argument wth the stupid kids here..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RZA on September 18, 2008, 10:02:05 AM
Even on that famos day, hois condiioning was not off, it's just that his body was giving up on him and it showed, the gut, the bices, triceps...Years of heavy training had taken its toll on him. But apart from that day, he was one of the most consistent Bbers ever. And Nasser's quads were good at one point, sure. Fuller, yes. Sharper, depends to which Dorian you compare him to.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 18, 2008, 10:32:09 AM
Even on that famos day, hois condiioning was not off, it's just that his body was giving up on him and it showed, the gut, the bices, triceps...Years of heavy training had taken its toll on him. But apart from that day, he was one of the most consistent Bbers ever. And Nasser's quads were good at one point, sure. Fuller, yes. Sharper, depends to which Dorian you compare him to.

I am comparing the best shape of Nasser's quads with the best shape of Dorian's.. Still Dorian's quads were among the best.. As for calves, bth of them had excellent pairs.. But Dorian's looked a little fuller.. The only guys in there time who came close in this part were Paul Dellite and Mike Matarazo..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Big Worm on September 18, 2008, 11:07:32 AM
epic stalking of 2 year old posts . you say you come here to "unwind" yet all you do is look at nude men (and call that gay) and talk about nasser's underwear and call everyone else gay.
if you can't see the red flags everyone else can ;D
Nude men ? Sorry . But you're looking far too hard ..You see Squabby ..This is my exact point when I said,I'm a different man .. I see a man in posing trunks..You see "nude"men..I talk about men the "that" buy Nassoils used trunks.. and if you own a pair of his used clothing then YES..you are a homo..I see flags all right ..But they're yours and they're rainbow colored ..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 12:10:13 PM
Let's not forget that calves are also a very important part of the "leg"

They're trying to forget
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 12:12:14 PM

Both sets of quads are relatively unimpressive by today's standards. Not much size and no striations. Good calves obviously though.


Haha, I bet ND or Suckmydick is gonna point out the exceptional sartorious development or some inane sh*t.



yeah because that not part of leg development  ::) and neither is muscular proportion and balance either
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 18, 2008, 04:21:49 PM
yeah because that not part of leg development  ::) and neither is muscular proportion and balance either

oh the irony of ND defending a man who throughout most of his reign had calves larger than his arms-and calves that over powered the quads- speaking about 'balance and proportions' LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 04:27:25 PM
oh the irony of ND defending a man who throughout most of his reign had calves larger than his arms-and calves that over powered the quads- speaking about 'balance and proportions' LOL

 ::) ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)

You think that proves anything? its ONE picture , you're to used to worshiping twigs on Coleman and think proportionate calves are to big  ;)

Ms Olympia has bigger & better calves than this

Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 04:28:56 PM
These are proportionate LEGS calves in proportion with the quads , hamstrings in proportion with the quads , perfect
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: QuakerOats on September 18, 2008, 04:29:12 PM
You think that proves anything? its ONE picture , you're to used to worshiping twigs on Coleman and think proportionate calves are to big  ;)

Ms Olympia has bigger & better calves than this


they're almost as big as Dorian's arms here. :D
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 18, 2008, 04:32:04 PM
You think that proves anything? its ONE picture , you're to used to worshiping twigs on Coleman and think proportionate calves are to big  ;)

Ms Olympia has bigger & better calves than this



LOL once again, you are sitting on the computer waiting for me to post.

holy shit man I am gone all day, post and 3 seconds later you post.. ::)

do you even have a job? ??? :-\
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 04:33:21 PM
LOL once again, you are sitting on the computer waiting for me to post.

holy shit man I am gone all day, post and 3 seconds later you post.. ::)

do you even have a job? ??? :-\

yeah keep flattering yourself I was posting before you came  ;) what thread did YOU post in when you first logged on? thank you have a nice day  ;)

Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 18, 2008, 04:33:25 PM
These are proportionate LEGS calves in proportion with the quads , hamstrings in proportion with the quads , perfect
:o
DAMN

they look almost as good as my legs  ;D
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 04:37:53 PM
LEGS  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: QuakerOats on September 18, 2008, 04:39:15 PM
LEGS  ;)
hahahhaha, his quads are terrible, his calves are the same size as his quads. ::)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 04:44:29 PM
hahahhaha, his quads are terrible, his calves are the same size as his quads. ::)

I'm sure you believe that Dave , just like Nasser beats Dorian in a back shot .  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 18, 2008, 05:34:16 PM
these are legs
again
everybody has been
Levrowned
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 05:37:27 PM
these are legs
again
everybody has been
Levrowned

Better calves than Ronnie , no where near Dorian , although Leverone's quads were awesome
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 18, 2008, 05:41:07 PM
Better calves than Ronnie , no where near Dorian , although Leverone's quads were awesome
I don't think any body has or will ever come near Dorian's calves
it's a shame Levrone never won the olympia  >:(
it's a shame and BULLSHIT  >:(
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 18, 2008, 05:42:36 PM
Better calves than Ronnie , no where near Dorian , although Leverone's quads were awesome
if it's a calves game then tune into Mr. Getbig my friend, I'll show you how the Dorian Yate's calves are supposed to look
on a natural  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 05:43:28 PM
I don't think any body has or will ever come near Dorian's calves
it's a shame Levrone never won the olympia  >:(
it's a shame and BULLSHIT  >:(

Its a shame Kevin could never put together the right combo
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 18, 2008, 05:47:30 PM
Its a shame Kevin could never put together the right combo
you're kidding right?
how does ronnie coleman with a bloated gut beat him year after year?
how does dorian yates with a torn bicep and a bloated gut beat him year after year?
Levrone should have won the olympia atleast once and you know it
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 18, 2008, 05:55:05 PM
Quote
Levrone should have won the olympia atleast once and you know it

according to musclemag, many back stage at the Mr. olympia 1994 thought that Kevin, not Shawn, should have won.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: ASJChaotic on September 18, 2008, 05:59:15 PM
according to musclemag, many back stage at the Mr. olympia 1994 thought that Kevin, not Shawn, should have won.
considering the fact that Dorian Yates looked like shit as ALWAYS......no doubt   ;)
.........waiting for ND to jump in ;D
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 06:01:17 PM
according to musclemag, many back stage at the Mr. olympia 1994 thought that Kevin, not Shawn, should have won.

To bad ' many ' backstage don't judge contests  ;)

and my of the audience in attendance were pissed Kein placed third instead of second
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 06:03:06 PM
Flex magazine January 1995 Shawn Ray

Dorian was a bigger version of what he's been. I'm not a fan in the sense that his physique is something I aspire to attain. Dorian is in his own class and in his own little world. For that reason, there's nobody they can compare like-to-like with Dorian. They can only bring forward a different package.

( 1994 Mr Olympia ) Tonight I feel that I got what I deserved. With a beaming smile , Shawn concluded: " This is the first time in three years I haven't ' retired ' the night of the show and got drunk. "


Shawn happy with his second place finish  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 06:06:32 PM
Musclemag International Feb 1995

On the 1994 Mr Olympia

Was it after all a luckywin? I chose to use the word " lucky " because  without a doubt there was an element of luck involved in Dorian's third consecutive Mr. O title . He was far from his best.

I would NOT not wish the reader to leave these pages thinking that the Sandow had been given a handout. THAT WOULD BE FAR FROM THE TRUTH.


Musclemag , this is musclemag even they don't agree with you Hulkster  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: aussiepro on September 18, 2008, 06:10:48 PM
kevin should have won in 2002 no question about it.
he killed ronnie that year
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 18, 2008, 06:21:09 PM
Flex magazine January 1995 Shawn Ray

Dorian was a bigger version of what he's been. I'm not a fan in the sense that his physique is something I aspire to attain. Dorian is in his own class and in his own little world. For that reason, there's nobody they can compare like-to-like with Dorian. They can only bring forward a different package.

( 1994 Mr Olympia ) Tonight I feel that I got what I deserved. With a beaming smile , Shawn concluded: " This is the first time in three years I haven't ' retired ' the night of the show and got drunk. "


Shawn happy with his second place finish  ;)

shawn was only happy about his finish while still under contract from Joe Weider.


remember how his opinion changed when he was out of the contract...

he said what everyone else says: he got fucked over by a one armed (bloated) bandit LOL
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 18, 2008, 06:26:44 PM
shawn was only happy about his finish while still under contract from Joe Weider.


remember how his opinion changed when he was out of the contract...

he said what everyone else says: he got fucked over by a one armed (bloated) bandit LOL

You have your excuses and that's ALL you have  ;)

Musclemag doesn't agree with you , Shawn Ray doesn't agree with you , the IFBB judges crush your opinion you have nothing as usual
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 18, 2008, 06:42:30 PM
You have your excuses and that's ALL you have  ;)

Musclemag doesn't agree with you , Shawn Ray doesn't agree with you , the IFBB judges crush your opinion you have nothing as usual

do you want me to pull up old shawn quotes from when he was active on this board?

you know damn well he has publicly stated on getbig that he felt he was screwed.

if you are too stupid to understand that he was not going to bash the champion of Joe Weider's namesake contest while under contract with him, well, thats why you work at McDonalds LOL
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: GhostDog on September 18, 2008, 07:22:37 PM
do you want me to pull up old shawn quotes from when he was active on this board?



yes, we really do. that would be a great use of your time and short life on this earth. it could go with the 20k posts you already have having the same fucking argument about a guy in trunks
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 19, 2008, 02:29:43 AM
do you want me to pull up old shawn quotes from when he was active on this board?

you know damn well he has publicly stated on getbig that he felt he was screwed.

if you are too stupid to understand that he was not going to bash the champion of Joe Weider's namesake contest while under contract with him, well, thats why you work at McDonalds LOL

  Fuck you, Hulkster. Sore loser with no honor or shame. And your McDonald's line is pathetic. That is called ad hominem and it shows everyone that you lost the debate, can't reply with logic, and thus needs to resort to attacks on character. You are beyond the point of being contemptible.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Wiggs on September 19, 2008, 02:36:18 AM
Dorian had great legs and calves. You have to be a hypocrit to say otherwise. That comparison is interesting once again, Sherief. I think that Dorian's conditioning is actually a bit better in '94 but he's a bit fuller in '93. Could be the lighting also. Very close though.

Calves hell yes.  The best.

Legs hell no!  Not much separation or sweep. Hamstrings ok.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RZA on September 19, 2008, 02:42:29 AM
I beg to differ. I'm not saying he had the best legs in the business. But he had great legs. He wasn't DeMayo or Platz but his legs matched his overall mass. And for at least four years (91 to 95), it says a lot.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Bear on September 19, 2008, 03:27:28 AM
2day's standards??? Do u mean that Jay's legs look better than Dorian's???.. No man no way..

Are you kidding? You probably are, Jay has cross striations, twice as much size and separation, and his calves are actually close to being as good. Twice the size and separation. He looks like he has has a whole extra bit on the side of his legs that Dorian never even had.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: m8 on September 19, 2008, 03:51:58 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=234782.0;attach=275184;image)

Very impressive.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2008, 05:13:18 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=234782.0;attach=275184;image)

Very impressive unless you compare to Ronnie. Or Kevin. Or Jay. Or Shawn or...

fixed  8)

dorian had FANTASTIC calves - but they overpowered many of his poses, esp his signature single arm bi shot.

despite this, the idiot nuthuggers still love to praise his supposed 'balance and proportions" (sic) LOL ::)

but in the quad department - huge quads

but piss poor seperation from the front and mediocre sweep.

sorry but facts are facts:
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: bigbobs on September 19, 2008, 08:51:45 AM
  Fuck you, Hulkster. Sore loser with no honor or shame. And your McDonald's line is pathetic. That is called ad hominem and it shows everyone that you lost the debate, can't reply with logic, and thus needs to resort to attacks on character. You are beyond the point of being contemptible.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

(http://cornerstork.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/crying_baby.jpg)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 19, 2008, 09:47:32 AM
(http://cornerstork.files.wordpress.com/2008/05/crying_baby.jpg)

  This coming from the big baby who's still crying that his hero got raped onstage by Dorian over a decade after it happened. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 19, 2008, 10:05:15 AM
  This coming from the big baby who's still crying that his hero got raped onstage by Dorian over a decade after it happened. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

yeah, a hero that was practically in his teens LOL ::)

Momo beat dorian's ass too you know.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 19, 2008, 10:09:51 AM
yeah, a hero that was practically in his teens LOL

Momo beat dorian's ass too you know.


  What are you talking about? Nasser was 30 years old when Dorian destroyed him for the first time at the 1995 Olympia, and was 32 when he lost the 1997 Olympia to Yates.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2008, 10:13:16 AM
do you want me to pull up old shawn quotes from when he was active on this board?

you know damn well he has publicly stated on getbig that he felt he was screwed.

if you are too stupid to understand that he was not going to bash the champion of Joe Weider's namesake contest while under contract with him, well, thats why you work at McDonalds LOL

pull em all up it doesn't matter , thats how he felt in 1994 directly after the contest , and once again your nonsense is dying to be corrected , Shawn was known as one of the most outspoken bodybuilders in his time , he openly & publicly criticized the IFBB judges and the criteria , so much for your theory that he waited until his Weider contract ran out  ;)

Shawn also said Ronnie shouldn't have won in 1998 that means what? you like Shawn's quotes now  ;)

and Hulkster I could be homeless using the PC at the public library and my only source of income could be redeeming aluminum cans I still know more about competitive bodybuilding than you  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2008, 10:15:16 AM
  What are you talking about? Nasser was 30 years old when Dorian destroyed him for the first time at the 1995 Olympia, and was 32 when he lost the 1997 Olympia to Yates.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

Ha Ha he tried that with Ronnie who is just 2 years younger than Yates and started trainer much earlier than Dorian
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: m8 on September 19, 2008, 10:17:24 AM
Ronnie who is just 2 years younger than Yates and started trainer much earlier than Dorian

very true.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2008, 10:19:36 AM
fixed  8)

dorian had FANTASTIC calves - but they overpowered many of his poses, esp his signature single arm bi shot.

despite this, the idiot nuthuggers still love to praise his supposed 'balance and proportions" (sic) LOL ::)

but in the quad department - huge quads

but piss poor seperation from the front and mediocre sweep.

sorry but facts are facts:

 ;)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: bigbobs on September 19, 2008, 10:39:56 AM
  This coming from the big baby who's still crying that his hero got raped onstage by Dorian over a decade after it happened. ;)

SUCKMYMUSCLE

haha, nice try, but I'm not the one who uses phrases like "fuck you Hulkster!" - hence the crybaby pic.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RocketSwitch625 on September 19, 2008, 10:41:18 AM
;)

There was a time when Dorian Yates had perfect biceps but Ronnie Coleman ALWAYS had the worst calves in professional bodybuilding. LOL

(http://www.2-bodybuilding.com/uploads/posts/2008-06/1213450193_3.jpg)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=234782.0;attach=275324;image)

As for overall leg development, Yates rules hands down.

(http://www.extrem-sport.com/bodybuilding/yates1.jpg)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on September 19, 2008, 10:41:22 AM
haha, nice try, but I'm not the one who uses phrases like "fuck you Hulkster!" - hence the crybaby pic.

You're the one who cries politics , so the baby pic could apply to you
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: England_1 on September 19, 2008, 10:45:37 AM
NO FLAWS!

(http://www.extrem-sport.com/bodybuilding/yates1.jpg)
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: RocketSwitch625 on September 19, 2008, 10:53:15 AM
Are you kidding? You probably are, Jay has cross striations, twice as much size and separation, and his calves are actually close to being as good. Twice the size and separation. He looks like he has has a whole extra bit on the side of his legs that Dorian never even had.

This coming from a guy who said that Ronnie Coleman had more separation in his left biceps than Jay Cutler had in his entire body. LOL
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 19, 2008, 11:49:05 AM
There was a time when Dorian Yates had perfect biceps but Ronnie Coleman ALWAYS had the worst calves in professional bodybuilding. LOL

(http://www.2-bodybuilding.com/uploads/posts/2008-06/1213450193_3.jpg)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=234782.0;attach=275324;image)

As for overall leg development, Yates rules hands down.

(http://www.extrem-sport.com/bodybuilding/yates1.jpg)


This set of black and white pictures is the most impressive gym shots 4 him.. Does any one have the whole set??..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on September 19, 2008, 11:54:46 AM
Are you kidding? You probably are, Jay has cross striations, twice as much size and separation, and his calves are actually close to being as good. Twice the size and separation. He looks like he has has a whole extra bit on the side of his legs that Dorian never even had.

Jay's legs r huge and sharp but they r not symetrical in shape.. I have also red that at the last Olympia one of them looked bigger than the other.. 4 me Dorian's leg looked better.. Jay has the same problem between his 2 biceps..
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 19, 2008, 08:44:33 PM
Jay's legs r huge and sharp but they r not symetrical in shape.. I have also red that at the last Olympia one of them looked bigger than the other.. 4 me Dorian's leg looked better.. Jay has the same problem between his 2 biceps..

  Jay's legs are weiird. Great, great quads with incredible development and cuts, but there is something about it's shape that makes it look like turnips. Jay in general has very shitty shape and too many structural flaws to be regarded as a great bodybuilder.

SUCKMYMUSCLE
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 20, 2008, 05:43:20 AM
  What are you talking about? Nasser was 30 years old when Dorian destroyed him for the first time at the 1995 Olympia, and was 32 when he lost the 1997 Olympia to Yates.

SUCKMYMUSCLE

you are missing the point.

ronnie lost to everyone under the sun when he was an up and comer far from his peak.

dorian lost to Momo when he was an up and comer far from his peak too.

you cant compare Ronnie of the mid 90s to the ronnie of the late 90s and say its the same thing and that dorian would still win.

that is totaly stupid. everyone always tells you idiots this but you just don't get it.

Zane beat Arnold too in much the same scenario.

Zane would never beat Arnold when he was at his peak.

thats the point.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: Hulkster on September 20, 2008, 05:45:48 AM
This coming from a guy who said that Ronnie Coleman had more separation in his left biceps than Jay Cutler had in his entire body. LOL

and whats the problem with this statement LOL ::)

its pretty damn close.
Title: Re: Dorian's Legs.
Post by: suckmymuscle on September 20, 2008, 08:50:24 AM
you are missing the point.

ronnie lost to everyone under the sun when he was an up and comer far from his peak.

dorian lost to Momo when he was an up and comer far from his peak too.

you cant compare Ronnie of the mid 90s to the ronnie of the late 90s and say its the same thing and that dorian would still win.

that is totaly stupid. everyone always tells you idiots this but you just don't get it.

Zane beat Arnold too in much the same scenario.

Zane would never beat Arnold when he was at his peak.

thats the point.

  I wasn't talking to you and about Ronnie. I was talking to BigBobs about his hero, Nasser. The conversation had nothing to do with you.

SUCKMYMUSCLE