Dorian's Legs.

[m8]

Some will even go as far as to say that it's the lower part of the leg, right beneath the knee. But Ronnie's fans consider those people as lying bastards.

Ronnie had great quadriceps, but seriously, look at those twigs 

[Hulkster]

Quote Ironaman Jan 1995 former IFBB Judge Roger Schwab 1994 Mr Olympia

" Best Legs - Yates from top to bottom "

hey was this the same judge that claimed dorian's missing bi 'had no overall overall effect' LOL

 

[Sherief Shalaby]

Actually I don't..Nor do I care ..Doesn't make me, any more fortunate ..Or less fortunate(thank god).

So upon wht u base ur opinions??.. If you don't knw the diff. bet. the body of this guy and tht why do u keep criticizing one of them and praising the other all the time??.. I hope u dont base ur choice upon the nationality or the religion of each guy..

[Sherief Shalaby]

Dorian had great legs and calves. You have to be a hypocrit to say otherwise. That comparison is interesting once again, Sherief. I think that Dorian's conditioning is actually a bit better in '94 but he's a bit fuller in '93. Could be the lighting also. Very close though.

Even if it's the lighting,.. I don't want to show that his legs were better in 94 than in 93,.. no.. I just wanted to say that although he was off in 94 his legs were still on and can be compared to his legs in 93 which was his best shape ever.. In 95 his legs were a little smaller and ironically not as sharp as in 93 or 94..

[Sherief Shalaby]

Let's not forget that calves are also a very important part of the "leg"

Who said they r not

[m8]

Who said they r not

Hulkster and many others keep posting shots cut at the knee, so I assume they do, and for a very good reason since Ronnie had some of the worst calves ever seen in the pro ranks.

[Sherief Shalaby]

Hulkster and many others keep posting shots cut at the knee, so I assume they do.

4 me to have small thights and small calves is better thn having big thights and small calves..

[RZA]

Even if it's the lighting,.. I don't want to show that his legs were better in 94 than in 93,.. no.. I just wanted to say that although he was off in 94 his legs were still on and can be compared to his legs in 93 which was his best shape ever.. In 95 his legs were a little smaller and ironically not as sharp as in 93 or 94..

Do you have pics of '95?

[Sherief Shalaby]

Do you have pics of '95?

I dont want 2 post a certain pic. coz if it's bad u may think this is only one pic. and is not enough to judge.. It's better to go to muscletime.com and see the gallery of Mr. O. 95.. Plz do tht and let me knw ur opinion..

[RZA]

I'll try to see if they have the video somewhere. I think I saw it a few times a while ago. I also felt that Dorian looked much more impressive on videos than on pics. And those who've seen him "live" say that he was even more impressive.

[Sherief Shalaby]

I'll try to see if they have the video somewhere. I think I saw it a few times a while ago. I also felt that Dorian looked much more impressive on videos than on pics. And those who've seen him "live" say that he was even more impressive.

Whn I first started training I had some magazines from where I knew Dorian and the others.. But I didn't knw how Dorian was clearly above the others till I watched the videos of Mr. Olympia 93, 94, and then 95.. I watched them all in their times (although it was very hard to obtain these videos in my country as they were not very popular).. On the youtube I watched some clips from Mr. O. 96 and 97 and for me Dorian lacked his earlier effect on the stage specially in 97..

[Bear]

Bravo u r right.. The intention of this thread is 2 show that Dorian's legs in 94 which is considerd as his worst shape ever (of course after 97) were still very good and at their best condition.. Even some ppl here said they were better than his legs in 93 which is considerd his best shape ever.. I am just wondering how to keep his legs at their best in 94 while failing 2 keep his upper body in the same condition.. May be his legs wre coming 2 shape b4 his upper body?!.. In 95 his legs were good but smaller and a little softer than bth 93 and 94..

Both sets of quads are relatively unimpressive by today's standards. Not much size and no striations. Good calves obviously though.


Haha, I bet ND or Suckmydick is gonna point out the exceptional sartorious development or some inane sh*t.

[Sherief Shalaby]

Both sets of quads are relatively unimpressive by today's standards. Not much size and no striations. Good calves obviously though.


Haha, I bet ND or Suckmydick is gonna point out the exceptional sartorious development or some inane sh*t.

2day's standards??? Do u mean that Jay's legs look better than Dorian's???.. No man no way..

[m8]

Both sets of quads are relatively unimpressive by today's standards.

You make it sound like today's competition is stronger than it was in the 90's 

[RZA]

Yeah, today's standards are way higher than the '90s.  A guy like Gustavo who finished 3rd twice would have barely cracked the top ten during Dorian's reign.

[bodybuilder1234]

2day's standards??? Do u mean that Jay's legs look better than Dorian's???.. No man no way..

Jay may not of had a better physique but his quadriceps are better than Dorians

[RZA]

When did Jay show proper conditioning so we can verify your assesment? Ironman 2003? Since then, when? At least, Dorian's conditioning was never off.

[Sherief Shalaby]

When did Jay show proper conditioning so we can verify your assesment? Ironman 2003? Since then, when? At least, Dorian's conditioning was never off.

No Dorian was off on the famous day of 1997..
There is somethng wrong in Jay's quads, the right doesn't look like the left.. This is a comman thing among most of the other guys but wth Jay it's more abvious (same story wth his 2 biceps)..
The guy whose quads were really better than Dorian's was Nasser, his quads were biger and sharper.. I hope this wont start a new stupid argument wth the stupid kids here..

[RZA]

Even on that famos day, hois condiioning was not off, it's just that his body was giving up on him and it showed, the gut, the bices, triceps...Years of heavy training had taken its toll on him. But apart from that day, he was one of the most consistent Bbers ever. And Nasser's quads were good at one point, sure. Fuller, yes. Sharper, depends to which Dorian you compare him to.

[Sherief Shalaby]

Even on that famos day, hois condiioning was not off, it's just that his body was giving up on him and it showed, the gut, the bices, triceps...Years of heavy training had taken its toll on him. But apart from that day, he was one of the most consistent Bbers ever. And Nasser's quads were good at one point, sure. Fuller, yes. Sharper, depends to which Dorian you compare him to.

I am comparing the best shape of Nasser's quads with the best shape of Dorian's.. Still Dorian's quads were among the best.. As for calves, bth of them had excellent pairs.. But Dorian's looked a little fuller.. The only guys in there time who came close in this part were Paul Dellite and Mike Matarazo..

[Big Worm]

epic stalking of 2 year old posts . you say you come here to "unwind" yet all you do is look at nude men (and call that gay) and talk about nasser's underwear and call everyone else gay.
if you can't see the red flags everyone else can

Nude men ? Sorry . But you're looking far too hard ..You see Squabby ..This is my exact point when I said,I'm a different man .. I see a man in posing trunks..You see "nude"men..I talk about men the "that" buy Nassoils used trunks.. and if you own a pair of his used clothing then YES..you are a homo..I see flags all right ..But they're yours and they're rainbow colored ..

[NarcissisticDeity]

Let's not forget that calves are also a very important part of the "leg"

They're trying to forget

[NarcissisticDeity]

Both sets of quads are relatively unimpressive by today's standards. Not much size and no striations. Good calves obviously though.


Haha, I bet ND or Suckmydick is gonna point out the exceptional sartorious development or some inane sh*t.

yeah because that not part of leg development  and neither is muscular proportion and balance either

[Hulkster]

yeah because that not part of leg development  and neither is muscular proportion and balance either

oh the irony of ND defending a man who throughout most of his reign had calves larger than his arms-and calves that over powered the quads- speaking about 'balance and proportions' LOL

 

[NarcissisticDeity]

oh the irony of ND defending a man who throughout most of his reign had calves larger than his arms-and calves that over powered the quads- speaking about 'balance and proportions' LOL

 

You think that proves anything? its ONE picture , you're to used to worshiping twigs on Coleman and think proportionate calves are to big 

Ms Olympia has bigger & better calves than this