Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: mesmorph78 on December 11, 2008, 03:18:51 PM

Title: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 11, 2008, 03:18:51 PM
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y225/lucas78/massivecoleman.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y225/lucas78/colemadamn.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y225/lucas78/colda.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y225/lucas78/ronnie04.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y225/lucas78/ronnie04.jpg)
 :-\
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 03:19:48 PM

 :-\

Better forearms and triceps sure NOT bigger , although his forearms at the same weights would be bigger
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 03:23:36 PM
Better forearms and triceps sure NOT bigger , although his forearms at the same weights would be bigger

You don't understand anatomy and don't lift either. Coleman's tris are about twice the size, Yates' were more cut.

Here's a good pic of the keg's smallish but cut tris when not pressed against his side.

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 11, 2008, 03:26:14 PM
dude its all about shape and size.. colemans winns in both departments
dissect the argument how much you want but after looking at pics (and for those who have seen both in real life) you and suckmymuscles are probably the only two human beings on this planet earth who would say dorian had better arms than coleman
dorian was never mentioned in a greatest list for a reason
and coleman a;ways makes and 90% of the time top the list for a reason.
when you figure out that reason you will see the truth
mes
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 03:26:29 PM
ND's heroes are mainly white BBs-Reeves, Schwarzenegger, etc. Neither of those guys had great forearms, no one cared LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 03:27:14 PM
You don't understand anatomy and don't lift either. Coleman's tris are about twice the size, Yates' were more cut.

Here's a good pic of the keg's smallish but cut tris when not pressed against his side.



Your proof is posting an offseason pic of Ronnie to a pic of Dorian with a torn tricep , thanks for playing , SIZE ALONE doesn't make a better tricep
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 03:27:23 PM
you and suckmymuscles are probably the only two human beings on this planet earth who would say dorian had better arms than coleman
dorian was never mentioned in a greatest list for a reason
and coleman a;ways makes and 90% of the time top the list for a reason.
when you figure out that reason tou will see the truth
mes


hahaha brutal delusions by ND, who doesn't lift nor understand anatomy. The voices in his head keep reassuring him he's right, what else is new? ;D
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: affeman on December 11, 2008, 03:28:03 PM
You don't understand anatomy and don't lift either. Coleman's tris are about twice the size, Yates' were more cut.

HAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHA AHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH AAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAA :D
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 03:29:56 PM
HAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAA :D

Morphed. These aren't LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 03:31:09 PM

hahaha brutal delusions by ND, who doesn't lift nor understand anatomy. The voices in his head keep reassuring him he's right, what else is new? ;D


same contest and he's actually Flexing  ;)

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Sam on December 11, 2008, 03:32:52 PM
Ronnie was freakish big in the arms, while they were probably Dorians worst bodypart.

There seems to be some people on here who try to diminish Dorians 6 Olympias by saying he did not deserve all but one or two of them.
Let me say i saw Dorian compete in 3 Olympias and he fooking wiped the floor with the opposition. Was not even close, photos do not tell the whole story.

I happen to think that overall Ronnie at his best would prob beat Dorian - you would expect that as sport tends to move forward, but to try and diminish Dorians legacy of 6 Olympias is very much wide of the mark.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 03:33:46 PM
same contest and he's actually Flexing  ;)



Already covered, bonehead-his only good triceps shot is when his arm is pushed against his side, distorting the size plus of course your shot's on an angle that hides the deficiency LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 03:34:04 PM
dude its all about shape and size.. colemans winns in both departments
dissect the argument how much you want but after looking at pics (and for those who have seen both in real life) you and suckmymuscles are probably the only two human beings on this planet earth who would say dorian had better arms than coleman
dorian was never mentioned in a greatest list for a reason
and coleman a;ways makes and 90% of the time top the list for a reason.
when you figure out that reason you will see the truth
mes

listen to me I'm not claiming he has better ARMS just better triceps and forearms  ;)  

Ronnie's forearms are shaped like bowling pins , Dorian's are shaped better and insert near the wrist , this helps with proportion  in relation to the biceps/triceps

Triceps Ronnie may be bigger however the side head is thin and doesn't show as much deparation as Dorians

AGAIN stop confusing bigger with better , Ronnie's arms may be bigger but his side triceps pose isn't better
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 03:35:38 PM
Already covered, bonehead-his only good triceps shot is when his arm is pushed against his side, distorting the size LOL

it doesn't matter it's still a great shot and arms aren't growing 5" from this sport sorry , his side triceps shot despite not having arms as better than Ronnie is still much better
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 03:35:58 PM
listen to me I'm not claiming he has better ARMS just better triceps and forearms  ;)  

ND's hero Arnold and Coleman had the same types of arms-outrageious bis, big tris but not incredibly cut, average forearms. No one cared about forearms, they're both known for great arms.

NEXT
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: 240 is Back on December 11, 2008, 03:36:09 PM

Let me say i saw Dorian compete in 3 Olympias and he fooking wiped the floor with the opposition. Was not even close, photos do not tell the whole story.

I've heard this a lot - what was the difference?  his size?  3-d effect?  graininess, whatever that is?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Bluto on December 11, 2008, 03:41:45 PM
Dorian trained harder than Ronnie, thats the key issue here.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Sam on December 11, 2008, 03:42:18 PM
I've heard this a lot - what was the difference?  his size?  3-d effect?  graininess, whatever that is?

A bit of all three actually - When he stood next to other top boys - Levrone, Ray,Cormier,Sombaty he made them diminish somewhat, your eyes were drawn to dorian- he just looked like the winner and i have to say the other BBs on stage knew it also.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: The Showstoppa on December 11, 2008, 03:42:30 PM
Dorian trained harder than Ronnie, thats the key issue here.

At least 122% more harder, I would say.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: QuakerOats on December 11, 2008, 03:45:31 PM
dude its all about shape and size.. colemans winns in both departments
dissect the argument how much you want but after looking at pics (and for those who have seen both in real life) you and suckmymuscles are probably the only two human beings on this planet earth who would say dorian had better arms than coleman
dorian was never mentioned in a greatest list for a reason
and coleman a;ways makes and 90% of the time top the list for a reason.
when you figure out that reason you will see the truth
mes
you'll never win with Narcissistic Gayiety man, he's been Dorian's bottom bitch for years now.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: QuakerOats on December 11, 2008, 03:50:43 PM
HAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAAHHAHAHAHAAHAHAA :D
HAHAHAHA, BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OMMMMMMMMMMMMM ;D
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 11, 2008, 03:51:08 PM
ENOUGH!





of this f**king debate
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 11, 2008, 03:59:30 PM
ENOUGH!





of this f**king debate
you are free to ignore the thread...
...
just letting you know
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 11, 2008, 05:05:08 PM
LOL

this thread is completely stupid:
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 11, 2008, 05:07:20 PM
 :o
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 11, 2008, 05:40:52 PM
look at that last pic...
nd can u show me any pic of dorian with arms like that....
i notice you are trying to back peddle like you have never said dorian has better arms than ronnie
 :-\
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 11, 2008, 05:41:43 PM
look at that last pic...
nd can u show me any pic of dorian with arms like that....
i notice you are trying to back peddle like you have never said dorian has better arms than ronnie
 :-\

how's this? ;D
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 05:42:09 PM
look at that last pic...
nd can u show me any pic of dorian with arms like that....
i notice you are trying to back peddle like you have never said dorian has better arms than ronnie
 :-\

I didn't back peddle I said he has better forearms and triceps that hasn't change , please pay attention when I say better NOT bigger
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 11, 2008, 05:54:40 PM
how's this? ;D

Amazing how much wider Dorian's shoulders and lats are.   :o
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: koolie1 on December 11, 2008, 06:07:49 PM
...
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 06:17:21 PM
Amazing how much wider Dorian's shoulders and lats are.   :o

Ya, he was a MONSTER. :o
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 06:20:15 PM
Ya, he was a MONSTER. :o

monster forearms Ronnie
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: io856 on December 11, 2008, 06:23:40 PM
BINGGGG BANGGGGGGG BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 06:27:24 PM
monster forearms Ronnie

Just terrible, reminds of someone else with shitty forearms..
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 06:29:06 PM
Just terrible, reminds of someone else with shitty forearms..

yeah who cares about calves and forearms it's not like they make a difference in balance & proportion   ::)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: io856 on December 11, 2008, 06:30:40 PM
Just terrible, reminds of someone else with shitty forearms..
I wouldn't call those forearms shitty
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 06:33:28 PM
listen to me I'm not claiming he has better ARMS just better triceps and forearms  ;)  

Ronnie's forearms are shaped like bowling pins , Dorian's are shaped better and insert near the wrist , this helps with proportion  in relation to the biceps/triceps

Triceps Ronnie may be bigger however the side head is thin and doesn't show as much deparation as Dorians

AGAIN stop confusing bigger with better , Ronnie's arms may be bigger but his side triceps pose isn't better

You're a VERY stupid person.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 06:34:28 PM
You're a VERY stupid person.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA


Quote
I wouldn't call those forearms shitty

That's not sayin much.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 06:36:12 PM
You're a VERY stupid person.
  Thanks for saying " I can't prove you wrong so I'll just go on the offensive " pot calling the kettle black right here
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: io856 on December 11, 2008, 06:36:56 PM
I am a huge Dorian fan but no way am I comparing Dorian's arms to Ronnie's... nobody has matched that unbelievable combination of size, detail and hardness in the arms.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 06:37:17 PM
I didn't back peddle I said he has better forearms and triceps that hasn't change , please pay attention when I say better NOT bigger

You're clueless as to what a winning bodybuilding physique should look like.  I'm betting your own physique is rather blocky....no one in their right mind thinks Dorian has a physique preferable to Ronnie.  

 
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 06:38:52 PM
  Thanks for saying " I can't prove you wrong so I'll just go on the offensive " pot calling the kettle black right here

Truth is, you're not worth a reasonable argument.  I can appeal to reason all day long and it won't work when it comes to people such as you...so I'm just going straight for it.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 06:40:19 PM
yeah who cares about calves and forearms it's not like they make a difference in balance & proportion   ::)

We're comparing silhouettes now?  You're reaching...as usual. 

EPIC FAIL, ONCE AGAIN. 
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 06:40:48 PM
Truth is, you're not worth a reasonable argument.  I can appeal to reason all day long and it won't work when it comes to people such as you...so I'm just going straight for it.


Well thanks for admitting you can't offer up a cognizant argument . and I moved you enough to go right to ad hominem attacks.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 06:42:11 PM
We're comparing silhouettes now?  You're reaching...as usual. 

EPIC FAIL, ONCE AGAIN. 

can you not see a clear difference in balance & proportion? and I didn't fail , the silhouettes prove my point directly how important calves and forearms are in the overall scheme of things .

again blanket statement
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 06:46:08 PM
I didn't back peddle I said he has better forearms and triceps that hasn't change , please pay attention when I say better NOT bigger

You're not intelligent enough to have an opinion that counts.  Getbig is probably the only place others will semi-tolerate your foolish drivel.  That said, everyone seems to be reaching a point of extreme frustration with your obsession of Dorian.

Let me sum it up for your feeble mind, ND.

Dorian had a very grainy physique, sported some awesome wheels and trained like a man possessed.  However, he had sub-par arms for a top pro bodybuilder and tore his bicep early in his Olympia reign.  He also had a big ol' belly and very little V-taper.  Dorian's legend is based off B&W pics taken very early in his career when he didn't have torn muscles and a training video where he moved heavy weights in a very strict and controlled fashion.  Dorian is an excellent bodybuilder, no doubt....but he's nowhere close to Ronnie.  NOT EVEN CLOSE.

I know you can't comprehend this, but I'm putting it out there anyway.  Maybe you'll be struck by lightening one day and come to your senses like the rest of getbig.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 06:50:27 PM
Quote
Kevin Horton on Hulkster " a retard "

By the way, Kevin Horton's opinion doesn't really count for much as an objective opinion.  Kevin also doesn't seem to know much about how to keep his own self in decent shape. 

Just another self-righteous Brit blowing smoke...I got tired of hearing Dorian rail against Americans in his DVD w/Dugdale as well.  Dorian perceives Americans as weak-minded pansies.  SCREW OFF DORIAN! 

Keep fighting the good fight, Hulkster.

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 06:53:36 PM
We're comparing silhouettes now?  You're reaching...as usual. 

EPIC FAIL, ONCE AGAIN. 

HAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAA
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 11, 2008, 06:56:09 PM
You're not intelligent enough to have an opinion that counts.  Getbig is probably the only place others will semi-tolerate your foolish drivel.  That said, everyone seems to be reaching a point of extreme frustration with your obsession of Dorian.

Let me sum it up for your feeble mind, ND.

Dorian had a very grainy physique, sported some awesome wheels and trained like a man possessed.  However, he had sub-par arms for a top pro bodybuilder and tore his bicep early in his Olympia reign.  He also had a big ol' belly and very little V-taper.  Dorian's legend is based off B&W pics taken very early in his career when he didn't have torn muscles and a training video where he moved heavy weights in a very strict and controlled fashion.  Dorian is an excellent bodybuilder, no doubt....but he's nowhere close to Ronnie.  NOT EVEN CLOSE.

I know you can't comprehend this, but I'm putting it out there anyway.  Maybe you'll be struck by lightening one day and come to your senses like the rest of getbig.


well said!!
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 06:56:16 PM
You're clueless as to what a winning bodybuilding physique should look like.  

I'm betting your own physique is rather blocky

ROFL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:00:41 PM
You're not intelligent enough to have an opinion that counts.  Getbig is probably the only place others will semi-tolerate your foolish drivel.  That said, everyone seems to be reaching a point of extreme frustration with your obsession of Dorian.

Let me sum it up for your feeble mind, ND.

Dorian had a very grainy physique, sported some awesome wheels and trained like a man possessed.  However, he had sub-par arms for a top pro bodybuilder and tore his bicep early in his Olympia reign.  He also had a big ol' belly and very little V-taper.  Dorian's legend is based off B&W pics taken very early in his career when he didn't have torn muscles and a training video where he moved heavy weights in a very strict and controlled fashion.  Dorian is an excellent bodybuilder, no doubt....but he's nowhere close to Ronnie.  NOT EVEN CLOSE.

I know you can't comprehend this, but I'm putting it out there anyway.  Maybe you'll be struck by lightening one day and come to your senses like the rest of getbig.

Quote
You're not intelligent enough to have an opinion that counts.  Getbig is probably the only place others will semi-tolerate your foolish drivel.  That said, everyone seems to be reaching a point of extreme frustration with your obsession of Dorian.

More ad hominem attacks , great way to convey your point . placing all the blame on me while neglecting the other willing participants ( bias ) and if I were so way out of left field and there was really no debate the truce thread wouldn't be pushing 1700 pages . I'd be dismissed as loony and that would be the end of it the mere fact this topic persists is proof it's not as insane as the biased ignorant fan-boys would like to think and FYI I was sick of this debate eons ago hence why I offered a truce out of respect for fellow members that thread could have been 1 page it takes two to tango but you need to place the blame on someone I wonder why lol

Quote
Let me sum it up for your feeble mind, ND.

ad hominem please look up that word  ;)

Quote
Dorian had a very grainy physique, sported some awesome wheels and trained like a man possessed.  However, he had sub-par arms for a top pro bodybuilder and tore his bicep early in his Olympia reign.  He also had a big ol' belly and very little V-taper.  Dorian's legend is based off B&W pics taken very early in his career when he didn't have torn muscles and a training video where he moved heavy weights in a very strict and controlled fashion.  Dorian is an excellent bodybuilder, no doubt....but he's nowhere close to Ronnie.  NOT EVEN CLOSE.

At his best he's not only close to Ronnie but according to the IFBB judging criteria he's actually better in a lot of way , bias , preference and ignorance prevents you from seeing such , again you keep making blanket statements that he's so much better but offer no explanation , again a weak way to convey your point

and many people beg to differ with you on it ' not even being close ' in particular is Ronnie Coleman himself who has said one multiple occasions he feels if he faced Dorian , Dorian would win without a doubt , so seeing he and I share a common belief is he also ' feeble minded '? oh and please save yourself the embarrassment of typing he was being ' humble ' that's been corrected many times already  ;)

Quote
I know you can't comprehend this, but I'm putting it out there anyway.  Maybe you'll be struck by lightening one day and come to your senses like the rest of getbig.

wow you have high aspirations for me , so I can be like the rest of GetBig LMFAO where do you people come from? if that were the case I'd have to be totally ignorant on how competitive bodybuilding is judged , make blanket statements without any proof what so ever , rely on faulty logic and start right in with the ad hominem attacks

I'd rather people like Ronnie Coleman and see the obvious , Ronnie couldn't beat Dorian  ;)

thanks for playing , unfortunately we don't have any lovely parting gifts for you
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:02:37 PM
By the way, Kevin Horton's opinion doesn't really count for much as an objective opinion.  Kevin also doesn't seem to know much about how to keep his own self in decent shape. 

Just another self-righteous Brit blowing smoke...I got tired of hearing Dorian rail against Americans in his DVD w/Dugdale as well.  Dorian perceives Americans as weak-minded pansies.  SCREW OFF DORIAN! 

Keep fighting the good fight, Hulkster.



Ah your true motives are exposed lol and FYI not to constantly keep correcting you on your ' points ' Kevin Horton never took any side in this ' debate ' so you're wrong once again.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 07:03:17 PM
ROFL

In my experience, I've found ardent Dorian fans to be a group of guys who viewed Dorian as something far greater than he actually was.  They are usually out-of-shape white men who also happen to like Jay Cutler.  It's should be called the, "I'll pull for any white guy who's halfway good" syndrome. These people lack a trained eye or a real understanding of what constitutes a top-notch, winning bodybuilding physique.  

I'll make it easy for you guys - white guys typically do not have good aesthetics when they put on a ton of muscle.  Bob Paris, Benfatto, Rockel, Labrada, Jeffers....all of these men possess classic lines but have not pushed the mass limits.

Look at the top white pros - Gunter, Jay, Dorian....none of these guys have good aesthetics.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 07:05:50 PM
In my experience, I've found ardent Dorian fans to be a group of guys who viewed Dorian as something far greater than he actually was.  They are usually out-of-shape white men who also happen to like Jay Cutler.  It's should be called the, "I'll pull for any white guy who's halfway good" syndrome. These people lack a trained eye or a real understanding of what constitutes a top-notch, winning bodybuilding physique.  

I'll make it easy for you guys - white guys typically do not have good aesthetics when they put on a ton of muscle.  Bob Paris, Benfatto, Rockel, Labrada, Jeffers....all of these men possess classic lines but have not pushed the mass limits.

Look at the top white pros - Gunter, Jay, Dorian....none of these guys have good aesthetics.


I've been saying this for a loooong time. Basically pasty white UK nationalists and a few from the US are the keg's demographics and relate to him. Sadly it's true about alot of the current white BBs that they adore, though the 70s guys like Arnold and Szkalak were great.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: England_1 on December 11, 2008, 07:06:06 PM
In my experience, I've found ardent Dorian fans to be a group of guys who viewed Dorian as something far greater than he actually was.  They are usually out-of-shape white men who also happen to like Jay Cutler.  It's should be called the, "I'll pull for any white guy who's halfway good" syndrome. These people lack a trained eye or a real understanding of what constitutes a top-notch, winning bodybuilding physique. 

I'll make it easy for you guys - white guys typically do not have good aesthetics when they put on a ton of muscle.  Bob Paris, Benfatto, Rockel, Labrada, Jeffers....all of these men possess classic lines but have not pushed the mass limits.

Look at the top white pros - Gunter, Jay, Dorian....none of these guys have good aesthetics.


Coleman had horrible aesthetics.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=292841;image)

Hope this helps.

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:07:02 PM
I've been saying this for a loooong time. Basically pasty white UK nationalists and a few from the US are the keg's demographics and relate to him. Sadly it's true about alot of the current white BBs that they adore, though the 70s guys like Arnold and Szkalak were great.

Can always rely on you to play the race card
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 07:07:03 PM
Coleman had horrible aesthetics.



Hope this helps.



As per the above, pasty UK stereotype LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: England_1 on December 11, 2008, 07:07:14 PM
Pumpster posting naked men again saved on his HD  :-X
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 07:07:38 PM
Can always rely on you to play the race card

There's truth in it, what's your problem?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:08:19 PM
Pumpster posting naked men again saved on his HD  :-X

he has many apparently , he posted a pic of some naked guys sack the other day  ???
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: England_1 on December 11, 2008, 07:09:00 PM
he has many apparently , he posted a pic of some naked guys sack the other day  ???

He likes to fuck trannies what can you say?  :-X
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 11, 2008, 07:09:06 PM
Coleman had horrible aesthetics.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=292841;image)

Hope this helps.



DQ'd by username.  Sorry, "England_1"

The air at getbig is getting way too stuffy with Brits like you hanging around.  
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 07:10:23 PM
Can always rely on you to play the race card

Pot calling kettle. You're the one with a pronounced preferrence for "attractive white BBs" coupled with a smattering of "wel-behaved negroes" like Haney LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 07:11:05 PM
he has many apparently , he posted a pic of some naked guys sack the other day  ???

Seems to have stuck in the memory banks hahahaha
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:11:12 PM
There's truth in it, what's your problem?


Says you , you've yet to back up any of your claims , just stick to the ad hominem attacks you're good at those .

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 07:11:47 PM


Says you , you've yet to back up any of your claims , just stick to the ad hominem attacks you're good at those .



Internet diahhrea at it's best.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:13:22 PM
Pot calling kettle. You're the one with a pronounced preferrence for "attractive white BBs" coupled with a smattering of "wel-behaved negroes" like Haney LOL

Why are you putting up YOUR statements in quotes I never said any of the things you typed , you're a lair and we both know it. If those quotes were real you'd be able to prove it like when I say you refer to men dressed in drag as ' gorgeous ' I can prove it  ;) see that's how it's done.

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: England_1 on December 11, 2008, 07:15:09 PM
So called "aesthetics"  :-X

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=292841;image)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:17:03 PM
So called "aesthetics"  :-X

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=292841;image)

This is aesthetic too
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:17:56 PM
He likes to fuck trannies what can you say?  :-X

lmao he meets them on craigslist
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:23:42 PM
pecial Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


Taken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.

case closed no debate . none of you can counter this and anything you type is null & void
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Emmortal on December 11, 2008, 07:24:52 PM
This is aesthetic too

Like these aesthetics?

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:26:15 PM
Like these aesthetics?



Ah the difference being is no one is claiming Dorian is or was ever aesthetic  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 11, 2008, 07:27:45 PM
pecial Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


Taken out of FLEX nov 1999, page 90.  interview by jim schmaltz with ronnie before the 99 Olympia.

Jim:  What would have happened last year if Dorian Yates (recently retired winner of 6 straight Mr. Olympias) had competed?


Ronnie:  Dorian would have won again.


Jim: You think so?


Ronnie:  I know so.

case closed no debate .

ronnie's knows the politics as well as any of us do. the IFBB was into dynasties then.

this should be no surprise. ronnie made a statement on the politcal climate at the time.

its the same as anyone of us would have made.

we are not stupid.

but based on physiques, well, its laughable that ronnie 98 would have lost to a dorian yates in that stage of his career.

we all know that.

but the judges, being what the sport was back then, might have even given it to him.

after all, dorian 97 did not deserve to win (even you agree ND) yet he still did.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 11, 2008, 07:30:23 PM
ronnie's knows the politics as well as any of us do. the IFBB was into dynasties then.

this should be no surprise. ronnie made a statement on the politcal climate at the time.

its the same as anyone of us would have made.

we are not stupid.

but based on physiques, well, its laughable that ronnie 98 would have lost to a dorian yates in that stage of his career.

we all know that.

but the judges, being what the sport was back then, might have even given it to him.

after all, dorian 97 did not deserve to win (even you agree ND) yet he still did.

Please don't presume to speak for Ronnie  ;) if that were the case then Ronnie's quote would have looked something like this  ;)

THOUGHTS ON LOSING TO SCHLIERKAMP AT THE 2002 GNC SHOW OF STRENGTH:

It was nothing more than a way to create interest in the sport. No reigning Mr. Olympia had lost a show like this before. The goal was to shake things up, set the stage for a three-way battle [with Cutler and Schlierkamp] at the 2003 Mr. Olympia. There was no way in the world that I should have lost the GNC. Just look at the photos. I was victimized by the system


That's Ronnie talking about the politics , when he talks about Dorian he's talking FEAR  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on December 11, 2008, 07:31:10 PM
You don't understand anatomy and don't lift either. Coleman's tris are about twice the size, Yates' were more cut.

Here's a good pic of the keg's smallish but cut tris when not pressed against his side.



ths shot is from mr. o. 97 where he ws at his worse shape.. so it's not a good example here..
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 07:39:22 PM
ths shot is from mr. o. 97 where he ws at his worse shape.. so it's not a good example here..

Perfect scores there baby. ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 07:40:12 PM
Like these aesthetics?




hahahahaa
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 11, 2008, 07:41:51 PM
pecial Ed : Ronnie of Dorian competed in 1998 would you have smoked him?

Ronnie Coleman : NO I think he would have kept on winning as long as he competed I don't think he would have lost.


Read carefully. He was being diplomatic in ways ND cannot. He's not saying Yates was equal, he's saying he would've "won", just as this got "perfect scores" LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on December 11, 2008, 09:03:45 PM
Ya, he was a MONSTER. :o

paul looks at his best here..
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 12:26:18 AM
nd
ronnie also said.... on his unbelievable dvd

and i quote
"masterpiece... the best bbq sauce ..they making today"
....
that doesnt mean its the best...
u keep throwing around all these magazine quotes....
and ive asked you one question and you cant answer it.. 2 questions actually

1. have you ever seen dorian yates mentioned in a greatest asrm article or on a greatest arm list in a magazine
2.why do you think he has never been on any of them ..yet ronnie is one.. every single one?

please answer this
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: jr on December 12, 2008, 01:08:24 AM
Most pro bodybuilders have terrible "physiques".
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 12, 2008, 08:56:49 AM
Please don't presume to speak for Ronnie  ;) if that were the case then Ronnie's quote would have looked something like this  ;)

THOUGHTS ON LOSING TO SCHLIERKAMP AT THE 2002 GNC SHOW OF STRENGTH:

It was nothing more than a way to create interest in the sport. No reigning Mr. Olympia had lost a show like this before. The goal was to shake things up, set the stage for a three-way battle [with Cutler and Schlierkamp] at the 2003 Mr. Olympia. There was no way in the world that I should have lost the GNC. Just look at the photos. I was victimized by the system


That's Ronnie talking about the politics , when he talks about Dorian he's talking FEAR  ;)

According to Huckster, Dumpster and the rest of the seven dwarfs, politics have only worked against Ronnie and in favor of someone such as Yates.  lol According to them, Dorian was also the third shooter.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: affeman on December 12, 2008, 09:06:05 AM
Ronnie looks great there. Which Off-Season Guestposing was that? :)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 09:08:35 AM
According to Huckster, Dumpster and the rest of the seven dwarfs, politics have only worked against Ronnie and in favor of someone such as Yates.  lol According to them, Dorian was also the third shooter.

Major ND ball-worship from one of his dogs lol
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr. Magoo on December 12, 2008, 09:10:16 AM
Ronnie looks great there. Which Off-Season Guestposing was that? :)

the same one where his shoulders look to be bigger than a person known as having the best delts of all time?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 12, 2008, 09:16:43 AM
Major ND ball-worship from one of his dogs lol

Yawn.  More ad hominem attacks from a simpleton.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Griffith on December 12, 2008, 10:04:15 AM
 :-\
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 10:06:17 AM
Yawn.  More ad hominem attacks from a simpleton.

Major plagiarism. Ad hominem from your father-figure, simpleton from moi hahaha try again kid. ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 12, 2008, 10:20:32 AM
Major plagiarism. Ad hominem from your father-figure, simpleton from moi hahaha try again kid. ;)

Interesting that you would choose to debate the origins of my choice of wording, but not the validity of their having been applied to you.   ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 01:04:03 PM

1. have you ever seen dorian yates mentioned in a greatest asrm article or on a greatest arm list in a magazine
2.why do you think he has never been on any of them ..yet ronnie is one.. every single one?
please answer this

Nd .. suckmymuscle and england...
can you answer this please
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 12, 2008, 01:09:09 PM
who cares if he had better arms?
Paul Dillet never beat Dorian did he?  ::)
it's about presenting the most complete package and I have to admit he delivered.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 01:12:53 PM
1. have you ever seen dorian yates mentioned in a greatest asrm article or on a greatest arm list in a magazine
2.why do you think he has never been on any of them ..yet ronnie is one.. every single one?
please answer this

Nd .. suckmymuscle and england...
can you answer this please

yeah greatest forearms  ;) but according to you they must not be part of the arms

Peter McGough Ironage Oct 13 , 2007

Who had the best forearms you ever seen : Best forearms I have seen with my own peepers. not in order: Kaz, Dorian Yates, Gunnar Rosbo, Lee Priest, Phil Heath, Armin Shultz, Flex Lewis.


why is Ronnie not on this list? and you're missing the point having the best biceps/triceps doesn't make the best pose , judges look for forearms in every pose just as they do calves if they had a best arms contest Ronnie would surely beat Dorian is they had the best side triceps shot Dorian leaves Ronnie for dead

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 01:39:29 PM
nd....
i know it hurts but some body parts carry greater weight than others.. no one gives a shit about forearms... or calves in comparison....
to the upper arm and legs you walk down the road and i walk down the road i have 20 inch ripped guns you have 16 inc guns with big forarms i will still get more looks....
in face huge forearms on a small arm make the arms look smaller
at the end of the day the GREATEST ARM LIST WHICH IS THE ARM IN ENTIRETY
has Coleman on there most time at no one.. Dorian never made the greatest arm list ever....
so we can conclude that Coleman made the greatest arm list which the whole arm in total and Dorian never made it
because no matter how you dissect it and spin it Coleman's arms made Dorian's looks like toothpicks...
in fact the whole top 10 of the 90's during Dorian reign OWNED him on arms..... badly
the words Dorian... great... arms should not be used in the same sentence...
the factthat you would even compare Dorian's sub par arms to Coleman's... bewilders me...
 :-\ :-\
no one else in the entire bb industry has ever coined the sentence Dorian had great arms..
yet here you are saying they are better than arguably the two greatest arms ever...
cmon man....
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Pecs on December 12, 2008, 01:48:04 PM
man, 1500 pages of peak dorian vs peak coleman still has some ground to fight... but dorian having better ARMS than coleman???....... ???
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 01:49:20 PM
nd....
i know it hurts but some body parts carry greater weight than others.. no one gives a shit about forearms... or calves in comparison....
to the upper arm and legs you walk down the road and i walk down the road i have 20 inch ripped guns you have 16 inc guns with big forarms i will still get more looks....
in face huge forearms on a small arm make the arms look smaller
at the end of the day the GREATEST ARM LIST WHICH IS THE ARM IN ENTIRETY
has Coleman on there most time at no one.. Dorian never made the greatest arm list ever....
so we can conclude that Coleman made the greatest arm list which the whole arm in total and Dorian never made it
because no matter how you dissect it and spin it Coleman's arms made Dorian's looks like toothpicks...
in fact the whole top 10 of the 90's during Dorian reign OWNED him on arms..... badly
the words Dorian... great... arms should not be used in the same sentence...
the factthat you would even compare Dorian's sub par arms to Coleman's... bewilders me...
 :-\ :-\
no one else in the entire bb industry has ever coined the sentence Dorian had great arms..
yet here you are saying they are better than arguably the two greatest arms ever...
cmon man....

You're again missing the whole point . Ronnie's biceps are clearly better , his triceps are clearly BIGGER his forearms aren't who cares? what does his better arms do for his side triceps shot? NOTHING

and I hate to correct you but you may not care about calves or forearms JUDGES DO it's in the criteria for assessing physiques


When assessing a competitor’s physique, a judge should follow a
routine procedure which will allow a comprehensive assessment of
the physique as a whole. During the comparisons of the
compulsory poses, the judge should first look at the primary
muscle group being displayed. The judge should then survey the
whole physique, starting from the head, and looking at every part
of the physique in a downward sequence, beginning with general
impressions, and looking for muscular bulk, balanced
development, muscular density and definition. The downward
survey should take in the head, neck, shoulders, chest, all of the
arm muscles, front of the trunk for pectorals, pec-delt tie-in,
abdominals, waist, thighs, legs, calves and feet. The same
procedure for back poses will also take in the upper and lower
trapezius, teres and infraspinatus, erector spinae, the gluteus
group, the leg biceps group at the back of the thighs, calves, and
feet. A detailed assessment of the various muscle groups should
be made during the comparisons, at which time it helps the judge
to compare muscle shape, density, and definition while still
bearing in mind the competitor’s overall balanced development.
The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.


6. Side Triceps (see Figure 6)
The competitor may choose either side for this pose so as
to show the “better” arm. He will stand with his left or
right side towards the judges and will place both arms
behind his back, either linking his fingers or grasping the
front arm by the wrist with his rear hand. The leg nearest
the judges will be bent at the knee and the foot will rest
flat on the floor. The competitor will exert pressure
against his front arm, thereby causing the triceps muscle
to contract. He will also raise the chest and contract the
abdominal muscles as well as the thigh and calf muscles.
The judge will first survey the triceps muscles, and
conclude with the head-to-foot examination. In this pose,
the judge will be able to survey the thigh and calf muscles.
in profile, which will help in grading their comparative
development more accurately.




Front Double Biceps (see Figure 1)
Standing face front to the judges, with the legs and feet
in-line and a short distance apart, the competitor will raise
both arms to shoulder level and bend them at the elbows.
The hands should be clenched and turned down so as to
cause a contraction of the biceps and forearm muscles,
which are the main muscle groups that are to be assessed
in this pose. In addition, the competitor should attempt
to contract as many other muscles as possible as the
judges will be surveying the whole physique, from head to
toe.

The judge will first survey the biceps muscles looking for a
full, peaked development of the muscle, noting whether
or not there is a defined split between the anterior and
posterior sections of the biceps, and will continue the
head-to-toe survey by observing the development of the
forearms, deltoids, pectorals, pec-delt tie-ins, abdominals,
thighs, and calves. The judge will also look for muscle
density, definition, and overall balance

Calves and Forearms MATTER in contests the whole package is what matters and calves & forearms help tremendously with overall balance & proportion

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 01:51:18 PM
man, 1500 pages of peak dorian vs peak coleman still has some ground to fight... but dorian having better ARMS than coleman???....... ???

Better forearms absolutely , triceps sure NOT bigger mind you but better in terms of side head shape and separation
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 01:54:47 PM
all thats sounds great nd...
but the same experts you quote from magazines.. have never mentioned dorian in any capacity when it comes to arms yet coleman is always no 1 or 2
are you saying these guys quote quote so feverishly dont know what their talking about....
he didnt make the list because his arms are sub par colemans always make the list because he the greatest arms of all time.. period...
you can argue as musch as you like but you cant deny the facts

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Pecs on December 12, 2008, 01:55:20 PM
Better forearms absolutely , triceps sure NOT bigger mind you but better in terms of side head shape and separation

dorian's arms looks better in the side tricep pose.... thats about it. His forearms are better, but arms as a whole....well...
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 12, 2008, 01:56:51 PM
ND, are you saying that Ronnie was missing the muscles at the end of his limbs?  ;D
no calves or forearms LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:00:52 PM
dorian's arms looks better in the side tricep pose.... thats about it. His forearms are better, but arms as a whole....well...

I totally get what you're saying ! at least you get what I'm trying to say
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 12, 2008, 02:03:21 PM
You're not intelligent enough to have an opinion that counts.  Getbig is probably the only place others will semi-tolerate your foolish drivel.  That said, everyone seems to be reaching a point of extreme frustration with your obsession of Dorian.

Let me sum it up for your feeble mind, ND.

Dorian had a very grainy physique, sported some awesome wheels and trained like a man possessed.  However, he had sub-par arms for a top pro bodybuilder and tore his bicep early in his Olympia reign.  He also had a big ol' belly and very little V-taper.  Dorian's legend is based off B&W pics taken very early in his career when he didn't have torn muscles and a training video where he moved heavy weights in a very strict and controlled fashion.  Dorian is an excellent bodybuilder, no doubt....but he's nowhere close to Ronnie.  NOT EVEN CLOSE.

I know you can't comprehend this, but I'm putting it out there anyway.  Maybe you'll be struck by lightening one day and come to your senses like the rest of getbig.


This is a great post

I totally get what you're saying ! at least you get what I'm trying to say

Unfortunatley you've been backtracking ever since you made the comment that because dorian has superior triceps and forearms (to you anyway) therefore he has better arms than coleman.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 02:04:32 PM
Coleman's arms made Dorian's looks like toothpicks...

Pithy
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:07:35 PM
This is a great post

Unfortunatley you've been backtracking ever since you made the comment that because dorian has superior triceps and forearms (to you anyway) therefore he has better arms than coleman.

and that wasn't a great post in the least , he didn't counter ANY of my claims , made blanket statements and used ad hominem attacks , Oh I get it now the exact same thing you do lol now wonder why you think it's great lol

I haven't back tracked first of all  ;) and the original statement was said tongue in cheek , I could care less about who has the best parts who has the best mandatory pose is what matters most  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:10:26 PM
ND, are you saying that Ronnie was missing the muscles at the end of his limbs?  ;D
no calves or forearms LOL

You need both to have outstanding balance & proportion
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Brutal_1 on December 12, 2008, 02:12:52 PM
You need both to have outstanding balance & proportion


Wait a minute, ND, who are you trying to defend with that outline....Coleman's shape owns Dorian's all day long
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:13:41 PM
Somebody doesn't have proportionate forearms to match the size of his biceps & triceps guess which one
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 12, 2008, 02:13:55 PM
and that wasn't a great post in the least , he didn't counter ANY of my claims , made blanket statements and used ad hominem attacks , Oh I get it now the exact same thing you do lol now wonder why you think it's great lol

I haven't back tracked first of all  ;) and the original statement was said tongue in cheek , I could care less about who has the best parts who has the best mandatory pose is what matters most  ;)

And this is what they are - claims.

Spin it whatever way you wish nd, everyone here merely "entertains" your posts, claims, whatever

And you have backtracked. Infact you continue to do so.

There is no tongue in cheek in you

You truly believe the shit that you spout otherwise you wouldnt spend your life on here spouting.

You want to know the reason why its a great post - because to 99% of people it makes sense.

You unfortunately occupy the remaining 1%.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 02:14:03 PM
I totally get what you're saying ! at least you get what I'm trying to say

Funny, that's exactly what i've been telling this blockhead for ages. Yates' only good arm shot is side-tri, because he can squeeze the arm against his side and make it look bigger.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 12, 2008, 02:14:46 PM
Somebody doesn't have proportionate biceps to match the size of his forearms & triceps guess which one

Fixed
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 02:14:56 PM

Wait a minute, ND, who are you trying to defend with that outline....Coleman's shape owns Dorian's all day long


hahaha it's been obvious now that ND can't see.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:15:06 PM

Wait a minute, ND, who are you trying to defend with that outline....Coleman's shape owns Dorian's all day long

No it doesn't not by a long shot my by a country mile . Ronnie is a bunch of mis-matched parts , notice the glaring flaw of missing calves and forearms and how it makes Ronnie's pose incomplete
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 02:16:39 PM
Somebody doesn't have proportionate forearms to match the size of his biceps & triceps guess which one

Forearms aren't supposed to be the same size as the upper arm the way they are with the bricklayer.

Utter lack of upper arm development when compared with someone with good arm development.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 02:18:01 PM
nd clearly... you are very biased when it comes to dorian
... u still cant tell me why dorian has never and will never be mentioned.. when it comes to greatest arms of all time... lists that bb experts compile....
you are not debating you are arguing just for arguing sake...
 :-\
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 12, 2008, 02:18:36 PM
Somebody doesn't have proportionate forearms to match the size of his biceps & triceps guess which one

Looks good here

[img]
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:18:50 PM
And this is what they are - claims.

Spin it whatever way you wish nd, everyone here merely "entertains" your posts, claims, whatever

And you have backtracked. Infact you continue to do so.

There is no tongue in cheek in you

You truly believe the shit that you spout otherwise you wouldnt spend your life on here spouting.

You want to know the reason why its a great post - because to 99% of people it makes sense.

You unfortunately occupy the remaining 1%.

Don't presume to speak for me I said the comment was made tongue in cheek . and I didn't back track I'll still say he has better triceps & forearms wheres the back track? do I truly believe Dorian would beat Ronnie? absolutely and so does he , so I'm in great company

and again it wasn't a great post he was attacking the messenger because he doesn't like the message. and oh more dumb logic an appeal to numbers 99% of people on here think I'm wrong so I must be wrong lol

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:20:03 PM
Forearms aren't supposed to be the same size as the upper arm the way they are with the bricklayer.

Utter lack of upper arm development when compared with someone with good arm development.

See Strawman , two things . this pic proves NOTHING and he's not at his best , change the angle and things become more clear

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 12, 2008, 02:20:40 PM
Don't presume to speak for me I said the comment was made tongue in cheek . and I didn't back track I'll still say he has better triceps & forearms wheres the back track? do I truly believe Dorian would beat Ronnie? absolutely and so does he , so I'm in great company

and again it wasn't a great post he was attacking the messenger because he doesn't like the message. and oh more dumb logic an appeal to numbers 99% of people on here think I'm wrong so I must be wrong lol



whats so dumb about that?

Are you suggesting you're right?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHa
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:21:01 PM
Fixed

Says you , but one of those guys have more balanced and proportioned arms and it isn't Coleman
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:22:19 PM
Looks good here

[img]

Less noticeable when he was lighter however still not in the league of Dorian AT HIS BEST please pay attention to the key word
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:23:09 PM
Looks good here

[img]

and FYI that's from 1996 when Dorian was destroying Ronnie on a regular basis  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 02:23:36 PM
Forearms aren't supposed to be the same size as the upper arm the way they are with the bricklayer.

Utter lack of upper arm development when compared with someone with good arm development.
thats what im tellin him huge huge forearms are for fat endomorphs....
...
when coleman pulled up his sleeve to reveal his 24 inch cannon..
dorian can roll up his sleeve all day long,.... to show those endomorph forearms .... u tell me who will get more stares...
thing is as well dorians arms were mediocre 20 inches at most ... so those huge forarms made those sub par arms look even smaller...
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: americanbulldog on December 12, 2008, 02:23:54 PM
Yates versus Coleman, re arms, before injuries (both of them) Ronnie wins.  Post injury, Ronnie wins.  
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 12, 2008, 02:24:39 PM
and FYI that's from 1996 when Dorian was destroying Ronnie on a regular basis  ;)

your point

Your claim was an imbalance

I proved you wrong

Stop running
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:24:56 PM
whats so dumb about that?

Are you suggesting you're right?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHa

Thanks once again for proving my point , you offer up no counter points or arguments . you simply rely on faulty logic as your proof
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:26:36 PM
your point

Your claim was an imbalance

I proved you wrong

Stop running

No you didn't , you posted a pic when his imbalance was less noticeable FOR Ronnie that has nothing to do with Dorian , I don't need to run from you , he still has atrocious calves that lack development , detail and proportionate size to his quads any year , the same with his forearms and that's not even counting other parts of balance
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:28:24 PM
thats what im tellin him huge huge forearms are for fat endomorphs....
...
when coleman pulled up his sleeve to reveal his 24 inch cannon..
dorian can roll up his sleeve all day long,.... to show those endomorph forearms .... u tell me who will get more stares...
thing is as well dorians arms were mediocre 20 inches at most ... so those huge forarms made those sub par arms look even smaller...

Yates is a pure mesomorph no fat endomorph what the hell are you smoking?

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:31:38 PM
your point

Your claim was an imbalance

I proved you wrong

Stop running

Ronnie's forearms were never in proportion with his massive biceps triceps , at times some years were better than others but again the point stands , and we're not talking about the shape ( bowling pin ) and calves either
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:34:39 PM
Among his worse for balance & proportion
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 02:36:33 PM
let me ask someone else since nd wont answer
why do y'all think dorian was never included in the top 50 arms of all times list....
why?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:39:24 PM
let me ask someone else since nd wont answer
why do y'all think dorian was never included in the top 50 arms of all times list....
why?

Who cares? Ronnie has better " arms " does Ronnie have a better side triceps shot? not in a million years
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 02:41:08 PM
ok fine ... there u said it
ronnie has better arms
...
and i prefer coleman in the side tri imo ...
....
and...
thats only one pose..
but i still prefer coleman in thats pose
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:42:54 PM
ok fine ... there u said it
ronnie has better arms
...
and i prefer coleman in the side tri imo ...
....
and...
thats only one pose..
but i still prefer coleman in thats pose

It's not a matter a preference it's a matter of who satisfies the criteria better
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 02:44:32 PM
note i only said I prefer....
i never made an outlandish statment like u had when you said dorian had better arms than coleman...
which u had to retract
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:46:18 PM
note i only said I prefer....
i never made an outlandish statment like u had when you said dorian had better arms than coleman...
which u had to retract

i didn't retract I still says he clearly has better forearms and triceps  ;) notice I didn't say bigger I said better
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 12, 2008, 02:50:06 PM
ha ha ha ok nd...
 8)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 02:50:23 PM
Ronnie's forearms were never in proportion with his massive biceps triceps , at times some years were better than others but again the point stands , and we're not talking about the shape ( bowling pin ) and calves either

Blockhead, Schwarzenegger had the same imbalance. Outrageous bis, big but less than outstanding triceps cuts, no forearms. Some of the best arms in BB history, unlike the bricklayer.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 02:51:35 PM
It's not a matter a preference it's a matter of who satisfies the criteria better

BS (again)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 12, 2008, 02:52:10 PM
ha ha ha ok nd...
 8)

ditto

let him believe what he wishes

its makes for light entertainment
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 12, 2008, 02:53:17 PM
Blockhead, Schwarzenegger had the same imbalance. Outrageous bis, big but less than outstanding triceps cuts, no forearms. Some of the best arms in BB history, unlike the bricklayer.

just leave him be

you've tried as hard as anyone on this board to help him see but it wont work
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:55:56 PM
ditto

let him believe what he wishes

its makes for light entertainment

Again I'm so insane but you offer up nothing in response who is running now?  ;)

Dorian clearly has the better forearms out of the two and why? shape his insert near the wrist it's analogous to having high calves.  and they're in proportion with his biceps and triceps

Triceps Dorian's side head isn't as thin as Ronnie's and Dorian's shows better separation between the side & lower heads ( shown in the picture )

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:56:58 PM
just leave him be

you've tried as hard as anyone on this board to help him see but it wont work

lmfao by posting strawman comparisons and running from every valid point I've made lol no wonder why you would agree with him.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 02:58:09 PM
BS (again)

really ? is this where you claim politics that only worked in Dorian's favor and yet never in Ronnies?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Remo Williams on December 12, 2008, 03:13:24 PM
Somebody doesn't have proportionate forearms to match the size of his biceps & triceps guess which one

Dorian has a bigger and better arm than Ronnie in those 2 photo's.

Look at the length of the upper limb.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 03:28:17 PM
really ? is this where you claim politics that only worked in Dorian's favor and yet never in Ronnies?

Never said that, i actually acknowledge reality and politics in many contests LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 03:30:34 PM
Never said that, i actually acknowledge reality and politics in many contests LOL

Not really , you claimed Dorian received more gifts than Ronnie which contradicts reality
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 03:32:53 PM
Not really , you claimed Dorian received more gifts than Ronnie which contradicts reality

Doesn't contradict anything. Coleman's only arguable gift was one show against cutler. Even that's alot more debatable than the Yates debacles or Columbu.

 Nice try, you're talkig in circles again.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 12, 2008, 03:44:23 PM
why is this thread in existance again? ???
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: turner98 on December 12, 2008, 04:00:47 PM
Big Yates
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: turner98 on December 12, 2008, 04:41:29 PM
"Ronnie's mass was incredible." :o

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 04:57:48 PM
.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 12, 2008, 05:16:25 PM
I always find it funny that ronnie's arms look better than dorian's most of the time even when ronnie is fully relaxed doing something normal while dorian is fully flexing..LOL

thats just how much better his arms were..
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 12, 2008, 05:24:30 PM
Dorian stuck.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 05:32:53 PM
why is this thread in existance again? ???

same contest  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Pecs on December 12, 2008, 05:42:41 PM
this thread is building up.........who would have guessed??
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 12, 2008, 05:52:33 PM
whats really sad is that the picture with dorian holding the towel is probably the best arm shot of his career LOL

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 06:05:34 PM
whats really sad is that the picture with dorian holding the towel is probably the best arm shot of his career LOL



What's sad is your attempt to show him in a bad light because you fear great pictures of him

same contest
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 12, 2008, 06:21:28 PM
What's sad is your attempt to show him in a bad light because you fear great pictures of him

same contest

there are great pics of dorian's arms? 8)

even in 93 they were not that great:
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 06:26:23 PM
there are great pics of dorian's arms? 8)

even in 93 they were not that great:

See what you're doing is posting a strawman , a pic in which you think sums up his entire appearance at that contest when you know as well as I that's simply not true , from the front Dorian's arms don't look that huge and from the side you can get a better look and yes there are great pics of Dorian's arms you're scared to post them
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 12, 2008, 08:42:11 PM
Funny how some people are of the mindset that only the bicep constitutes an arm.  Perhaps this makes it easier to overlook deficiencies when it comes to forearms and triceps, I don't know.  The same type of mentality applies when it comes to the lower body as well.  Calves are seemingly of no importance at all, I guess.   ::)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 12, 2008, 08:43:13 PM
Funny how some people are of the mindset that only the bicep constitutes an arm.  Perhaps this makes it easier to overlook deficiencies when it comes to forearms and triceps, I don't know.  The same type of mentality applies when it comes to the lower body as well.  Calves are seemingly of no importance at all, I guess.   ::)
:o
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 08:48:17 PM
Funny how some people are of the mindset that only the bicep constitutes an arm.  Perhaps this makes it easier to overlook deficiencies when it comes to forearms and triceps

Funnier still, some people have half a brain and aren't aware that this has been addressed many times over, by reading lol
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: England_1 on December 12, 2008, 09:36:42 PM
what the fuck  :-X

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=293026;image)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 12, 2008, 09:37:54 PM
what the fuck  :-X

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=293026;image)

lol

owned by yates
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 12, 2008, 09:38:06 PM
what the fuck  :-X



Trying to emulate this winner's "perfect scores". :o
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 12, 2008, 09:40:46 PM
Trying to emulate this winner's "perfect scores". :o

 ::)
he could only try


(http://www.bodybuilding-pics.com/100/images/Dorian_Yates_photo79.jpg)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 05:37:52 AM
Quote
Perhaps this makes it easier to overlook deficiencies when it comes to forearms and triceps, I don't know.

yes, look at the "deficiencies"

 ::)

dorian would have killed to have these deficiencies..

his arms were horrible.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 05:43:12 AM
its funny how people overlook the incredible deficiencies yates has in vascularity, hardness, shape, and detail:

 ::)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: The Ugly on December 13, 2008, 05:54:32 AM
Seriously, though, who's better?

I totally wanna know.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 06:07:01 AM
its funny how people overlook the incredible deficiencies yates has in vascularity, hardness, shape, and detail:

 ::)
::)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 06:23:52 AM
lol what does ronnie's gut have to do with their flexed arms LOL

ND, you are a desperate and sad man.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 06:28:19 AM
lol what does ronnie's gut have to do with their flexed arms LOL

ND, you are a desperate and sad man.

that was any irony post fyi  ;) you should recognize the ploy.

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Relentless on December 13, 2008, 07:42:10 AM
ND, what do you do for a living?  And are there any posts of your physique floating around this board?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 08:05:47 AM
::)
::) ::)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Palpatine Q on December 13, 2008, 08:11:00 AM
These Ronnie vs Dorian threads have gotten beyond retarded.

I am  not biased either way I just believe what i see with my eyes, and that being said, anyone who thinks Ronnies arms weren't light years ahead of dorians is just being a stubborn idiot.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 08:20:01 AM
Quote
anyone who thinks Ronnies arms weren't light years ahead of dorians is just being a stubborn idiot.

yup, thats a good way to describe ND and his bitches.

stubborn idiots..
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 08:29:29 AM
yup, thats a good way to describe ND and his bitches.

stubborn idiots..
;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 08:31:15 AM
ND, what do you do for a living?  And are there any posts of your physique floating around this board?

Crickets
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 13, 2008, 08:31:55 AM
yup, thats a good way to describe ND and his bitches.

stubborn idiots..

let's not forget until 2 days ago I was defending Ronnie  ;)
open your eyes Hulkster
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 08:33:22 AM
let's not forget until 2 days ago I was defending Ronnie  ;)


Your instability is something ND relates to.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 08:34:51 AM
Your instability is something ND relates to.
  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 08:37:33 AM
ND, what do you do for a living?  And are there any posts of your physique floating around this board?
;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 13, 2008, 08:39:37 AM
These Ronnie vs Dorian threads have gotten beyond retarded.

I am  not biased either way I just believe what i see with my eyes, and that being said, anyone who thinks Ronnies arms weren't light years ahead of dorians is just being a stubborn idiot.

It's so very obvious, yet you lack the ability to communicate an analytical basis for your position, instead opting to be insolent towards those that disagree with you.  A familiar approach it would seem.  One wonders if this is resultant of the maladroit nature of the typical Coleman fan, or simply the inability of his physique to provide a solid foundation on which to base an argument.  It takes more than a bicep to constitute an arm. Few people would debate that Ronnie has the edge in terms of biceps, but as eluded to, the triceps and forearms also come into play.  Likewise, presentation becomes a very important factor while on stage.  Dorian's side triceps shot is but one example.  Even if one were to concede an advantage to Coleman in the area of biceps, would Dorian's advantage in triceps and forearms not technically give him the advantage in "arms"?  Seems like a case of simple deduction.  
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 08:40:07 AM
;)
;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: The Ugly on December 13, 2008, 08:42:11 AM
It's so very obvious, yet you lack the ability to communicate an analytical basis for your position, instead opting to be insolent towards those that disagree with you.  A familiar approach it would seem.  One wonders if this is resultant of the maladroit nature of the typical Coleman fan, or simply the inability of his physique to provide a solid foundation on which to base an argument.  It takes more than a bicep to constitute an arm. Few people would debate that Ronnie has the edge in terms of biceps, but as eluded to, the triceps and forearms also come into play.  Likewise, presentation becomes a very important factor while on stage.  Dorian's side triceps shot is but one example.  Even if one were to concede an advantage to Coleman in the area of biceps, would Dorian's advantage in triceps and forearms not technically give him the advantage in "arms"?  Seems like a case of simple deduction.  

So Ronnie or Dorian?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 08:42:18 AM
It's so very obvious, yet you lack the ability to communicate an analytical basis for your position, instead opting to be insolent towards those that disagree with you.  A familiar approach it would seem.  One wonders if this is resultant of the maladroit nature of the typical Coleman fan, or simply the inability of his physique to provide a solid foundation on which to base an argument.  It takes more than a bicep to constitute an arm. Few people would debate that Ronnie has the edge in terms of biceps, but as eluded to, the triceps and forearms also come into play.  Likewise, presentation becomes a very important factor while on stage.  Dorian's side triceps shot is but one example.  Even if one were to concede an advantage to Coleman in the area of biceps, would Dorian's advantage in triceps and forearms not technically give him the advantage in "arms"?  Seems like a case of simple deduction.  

No big arms means better arms , or as pumpster refers to them as ' show muscles ' calves mean nothing too

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: G o a t b o y on December 13, 2008, 08:44:51 AM
At least 122% more harder, I would say.


Just think if he had been on Muscletech back then...  he would have been 1,399.2% more harder!



PS:  Arguing about which oiled man in thong looks better is st00pid.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 08:47:00 AM
 :o
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 13, 2008, 08:49:32 AM
I wanna know if there an alien inside there :-\
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 08:50:50 AM
I wanna know if there an alien inside there :-\
:-X
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 13, 2008, 08:52:47 AM
amazing V-Taper  :o  ::)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 08:55:41 AM
 :-X
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 08:58:34 AM
Arnold " WTF "
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 09:12:24 AM
No big arms means better arms , or as pumpster refers to them as ' show muscles ' calves mean nothing too



its so ironic you are using a silouette of a 2003 precontest ronnie..versus the best dorian ever offered LOL

 ::)

this is a taper dorian could never match:
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 09:13:43 AM
^

ps check out the 99 rear lat spread.

dorian could only hope of achieving that.

he never could - his waist was keg thick.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ibfasport on December 13, 2008, 09:14:14 AM
Coleman had better calfs than Dorian
Coleman had a better smell tyhan Dorian
Coleman is more brillant too, he will be future president of the USA
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 09:26:33 AM
its so ironic you are using a silouette of a 2003 precontest ronnie..versus the best dorian ever offered LOL

 ::)

this is a taper dorian could never match:

Taper ?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 13, 2008, 09:27:54 AM
Complete arm development!

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=68682.0;attach=75811;image)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 09:31:18 AM
Complete arm development!

Biceps/triceps/forearms all in concert with each other and his torso which is why his balance & proportion were spectacular at HIS BEST mind you


Q ] What were some of your better physical qualities as a bodybuilder, do you think?


Obviously I carried a lot of muscle mass and my trademark was to come into a show in super hard condition. I think my muscles had a certain quality and density from all the years of heavy training that a lot of guys didn't have.



One thing that I think people underrated me on - it was never really mentioned because of my sheer physical size and condition - was my balance and proportion. Not only from muscle group to muscle group, but from upper body to lower body. My skeletal structure and everything else was there and in good balance.


Bev Francis : Bodybuilder's phsyique you most admire ?

The man Dorian Yates , his combonation of size and shape makes for an awesome physique , unlike a lot of big guys he's not a load of massive parts just thrown together , His symmetry is almost perfect , Everything is in proportion , no weak bodyparts .
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 13, 2008, 09:31:30 AM
yet he never made and greatest arm list....
compiled by bbing veterans and experts...
yet ronnie had made every single one..
and is top 2 mostly no 1
those experts must not have a clue huh...
 :-\
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 09:34:26 AM
yet he never made and greatest arm list....
compiled by bbing veterans and experts...
yet ronnie had made every single one..
and is top 2 mostly no 1
those experts must not have a clue huh...
 :-\


If it were a bodypart contest Ronnie would beat Dorian at best ' arms ' however that means nothing in a contest it's who has the best mandatory pose that counts
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 13, 2008, 09:38:41 AM
another list for you
in which dorian =and ronnie was included
greatest back of all time...
ronnie beat dorian...


... also another list greatest mr olympia of all time
ronnie was also chosen over yates...
process that information
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 09:42:40 AM
No big arms means better arms , or as pumpster refers to them as ' show muscles ' calves mean nothing too



That's an established BB term dating back decades you blockhead LOL there's a reason for it. Arms and chest and maybe back make more impact than calves, that's reality deal with it. See someone named Schwarzenegger for that hahah
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 09:44:13 AM
Complete arm development!


Almost all medial and lateral head development there kid, greatly lacking in size. Those with any comprehension of anatomy don't require an explanation. ;) Not at all complete, not even tris.

Great gut development however, the original GH meister.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 09:48:30 AM
yet he never made and greatest arm list....
compiled by bbing veterans and experts...
yet ronnie had made every single one..
and is top 2 mostly no 1
those experts must not have a clue huh...
 :-\


I guess you didn't realize that ND and cronies inhabit their own parallel universe. ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 09:50:14 AM
another list for you
in which dorian =and ronnie was included
greatest back of all time...
ronnie beat dorian...


... also another list greatest mr olympia of all time
ronnie was also chosen over yates...
process that information

Greatest Olympia of time? and you said if you didn't hear it yourself they don't count , so toss those lists away  ;)

http://www.elitefitness.com/forum/pro-bodybuilders-pictures/best-back-all-time-you-decide-39990-9.html

best back Yates

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=953337&page=2

best conditioned Yates

http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/pollresults.php

Would Dorian beat Ronnie - winner Yates

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3109401

who is better Ronnie99/03 Dorian 93/95 - winner Yates

http://www.musclemayhem.com/forums/showthread.php?t=25103

worse Mr Olympia ever - this is one poll Ronnie wins over Dorian

lmfao shall I continue?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 09:51:09 AM
That's an established BB term dating back decades you blockhead LOL there's a reason for it. Arms and chest and maybe back make more impact than calves, that's reality deal with it. See someone named Schwarzenegger for that hahah

contests are judged by ' show muscles ' this isn't the ironage  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 09:53:34 AM
Almost all medial and lateral head development there kid, greatly lacking in size. Those with any comprehension of anatomy don't require an explanation. ;) Not at all complete, not even tris.

Great gut development however, the original GH meister.

ha ha ha ha the key word was at his best dummy and a transition shot proves NOTHING this is Dorian at the same contest showing why his side triceps shot is the most complete and among the best ever in the sport
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: The Ugly on December 13, 2008, 09:53:45 AM
lmfao shall I continue?

Absolutely! Continue, continue.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 09:55:00 AM
untouchable side triceps even at among his worse
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 09:55:42 AM
contests are judged by ' show muscles ' this isn't the ironage  ;)

Epic self-ownage.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 09:56:57 AM
Epic self-ownage.

no that you reaching as usual , contests are obviously not judges by show muscles , please show me the part of the criteria that refers to them , please do  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 09:57:55 AM
ha ha ha ha the key word was at his best dummy and a transition shot proves NOTHING this is Dorian at the same contest showing why his side triceps shot is the most complete and among the best ever in the sport

You don't understand anatomy blockhead, because you keep posting pics from the wrong angle and never show him standing beside someone.

To see the long head deficiency pics have to be from dead-on or from behind, the opposite of what you're posting. DUH!
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 10:00:17 AM
You don't understand anatomy blockhead, because you keep posting pics from the wrong angle. To show the long head deficiency pics have to be from dead-on or from behind, the opposite of what you're posting. DUH!

You keep posting off year shots that prove zero , I know anatomy as well , you don't know how to be honest or accurate out of fear
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 10:03:29 AM
Coleman's triceps don't stack up to Yates
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 10:07:54 AM
Those are all pics of him by himself as usual. His triceps and arm deficits are clear when standing beside others.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 10:12:06 AM
Those are all pics of him by himself as usual. His triceps deficit is clear when standing beside others.

in size? not in shape or development  ;) think again
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 10:13:54 AM
Those are all pics of him by himself as usual. His triceps and arm deficits are clear when standing beside others.

You keep posting pic of Dorian with a torn triceps from 1997 and not his best 1992/1994 lol you're so scared of Dorian at his best because he's destroys anything Coleman has shown
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 10:14:36 AM
Those are all pics of him by himself as usual. His triceps and arm deficits are clear when standing beside others.

even Lee Labrada LOL

yes, dorian's arms are better than ronnie's LOL

 ::)

here is ronnie standing beside Lee LOL

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 10:16:24 AM
LMAO
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Iceman1981 on December 13, 2008, 10:16:46 AM
Greatest Olympia of time? and you said if you didn't hear it yourself they don't count , so toss those lists away  ;)


http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=3109401

who is better Ronnie99/03 Dorian 93/95 - winner Yates


I find it funny you would use a poll "you & the rest of your fellow goons know" that was rigged so yates gained close to 300 votes overnight for each year. This was already proven last year that team doughbuy cheated. LOL

Just read the comments in the thread.

Here is a screencap that was taken the same day............
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 10:17:50 AM
another list for you
in which dorian =and ronnie was included
greatest back of all time...
ronnie beat dorian...


... also another list greatest mr olympia of all time
ronnie was also chosen over yates...
process that information

ND probably can't even wipe his own ass and you want him to use basic reosoning? LOL
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 13, 2008, 10:18:27 AM
destroyed on arms by lee lebrada   :-\ martter of fact when dorian is in a pic doin an arm pose with any other pro bber
his arms get destroyed.. they look 20 at most
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 10:19:41 AM
I find it funny you would use a poll "you & the rest of your fellow goons know" that was rigged so yates gained close to 300 votes overnight for each year. This was already proven last year that team doughbuy cheated. LOL

Here is a screencap that was taken the same day............

yeah, ND or IceCold spent all night voting for that one.

it was the same with other polls mentioned on the truce thread.

we posted the polls that were months old, dorian was behind hundreds of votes.

the next day after the nuthuggers knew about the polls, dorian's vote count went up by hundreds overnights LOL

and they claim no involvement..

 ::)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 10:21:35 AM
Quote
destroyed on arms by lee lebrada   

yup.

why is this thread in existance again?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 13, 2008, 12:19:25 PM
You keep posting off year shots that prove zero , I know anatomy as well , you don't know how to be honest or accurate out of fear

Is it just me or when nd posts pics like these they do nothing to support his argument?

They're meant to be "good" pics but just aren't.

Yates has some of the ugliest lines in his triceps ever seen on stage

You can possibly claim they're better than say levrones in terms of size and shape
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 13, 2008, 12:26:55 PM
Quote
Is it just me or when nd posts pics like these they do nothing to support his argument?

this is true of pretty much any ND post

thats why he posts so many quotes/opinions all the time.

he runs from visual evidence because it seldom backs up what he claims in his posts.

this is the cornerstone of the ND dogma - avoid the visuals because they don't back up what he says..

see the truce thread for thousands of posts illustrating this sad fact.



Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 13, 2008, 12:30:57 PM
Is it just me or when nd posts pics like these they do nothing to support his argument?

They're meant to be "good" pics but just aren't.

Yates has some of the ugliest lines in his triceps ever seen on stage

You can possibly claim they're better than say levrones in terms of size and shape


Yes, it's just you.  Hope this helps.  :P
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 13, 2008, 12:31:40 PM
Is it just me or when nd posts pics like these they do nothing to support his argument?

They're meant to be "good" pics but just aren't.

Yates has some of the ugliest lines in his triceps ever seen on stage

You can possibly claim they're better than say levrones in terms of size and shape



it's just you and ND makes an arguement 100 times better than hulkster.
hope this helps.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 01:45:31 PM
yup.

why is this thread in existance again?


Ha ha ha ha pathetic excuse of a photoshopped side triceps shot

The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.


6. Side Triceps (see Figure 6)
The competitor may choose either side for this pose so as
to show the “better” arm. He will stand with his left or
right side towards the judges and will place both arms
behind his back, either linking his fingers or grasping the
front arm by the wrist with his rear hand. The leg nearest
the judges will be bent at the knee and the foot will rest
flat on the floor. The competitor will exert pressure
against his front arm, thereby causing the triceps muscle
to contract. He will also raise the chest and contract the
abdominal muscles as well as the thigh and calf muscles.
The judge will first survey the triceps muscles, and
conclude with the head-to-foot examination. In this pose,
the judge will be able to survey the thigh and calf muscles
in profile, which will help in grading their comparative
development more accurately.


notice how they say calf muscle? more than once
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 01:47:24 PM
Is it just me or when nd posts pics like these they do nothing to support his argument?

They're meant to be "good" pics but just aren't.

Yates has some of the ugliest lines in his triceps ever seen on stage

You can possibly claim they're better than say levrones in terms of size and shape


The pose genius , the entire pose . who has the better side triceps pose? Dorian does. he's Kevin getting destroyed in the side triceps POSE
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 13, 2008, 02:00:11 PM
The pose genius , the entire pose . who has the better side triceps pose? Dorian does.

Ah ah nd, ah ah.

Your claim is best tricep.

So stop running from one argument and claim to another.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:01:57 PM
Ah ah nd, ah ah.

Your claim is best tricep.

So stop running from one argument and claim to another.

Better triceps than Coleman absolutely better side triceps than Levrone absolutely any other questions?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 13, 2008, 02:04:48 PM
Better triceps than Coleman absolutely better side triceps than Levrone absolutely any other questions?


Bwahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahahaahaahahahahahaha hahahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
ahaahahahahahahahahahaha haahaahahahahahahahahaha hahaahaahahahahahahahaha hahahaahaahahahahahahaha hahahaha
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 13, 2008, 02:12:06 PM
dont know what pic your looking at but
levrone is murdering dorian in that pose....
blue murder
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:14:02 PM
I find it funny you would use a poll "you & the rest of your fellow goons know" that was rigged so yates gained close to 300 votes overnight for each year. This was already proven last year that team doughbuy cheated. LOL

Just read the comments in the thread.

Here is a screencap that was taken the same day............

Rigged? lmfao you can only vote once how is it rigged? and what about all the other polls are they fake too because they favor Dorian?  ;)
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:16:06 PM
dont know what pic your looking at but
levrone is murdering dorian in that pose....
blue murder

lmfao sure he is

is he carrying more muscular bulk than Dorian? NO is he harder & drier than Dorian? NO does he have better balance & proportion than Dorian? NO

all part of the criteria Dorian is leaving Kevin for dead in that pic the fact you can't see it is indicative of your ignorance on how bodybuilding contests are judged
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: ASJChaotic on December 13, 2008, 02:17:39 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=293199;image)

LOL

Kevin has bigger shoulders, arms, traps, chest, legs and a smaller waist, better lines, better abs and obliques
common ND hahahahahahahaha
blockyness does not equal beating someone in a pose
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:20:22 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=293199;image)

LOL

Kevin has bigger shoulders, arms, traps, chest, legs and a smaller waist, better lines, better abs and obliques
common ND hahahahahahahaha
blockyness does not equal beating someone in a pose

Please refer to how contests are judged

When assessing a competitor’s physique, a judge should follow a
routine procedure which will allow a comprehensive assessment of
the physique as a whole. During the comparisons of the
compulsory poses, the judge should first look at the primary
muscle group being displayed. The judge should then survey the
whole physique, starting from the head, and looking at every part
of the physique in a downward sequence, beginning with general
impressions, and looking for muscular bulk, balanced
development, muscular density and definition. The downward
survey should take in the head, neck, shoulders, chest, all of the
arm muscles, front of the trunk for pectorals, pec-delt tie-in,
abdominals, waist, thighs, legs, calves and feet. The same
procedure for back poses will also take in the upper and lower
trapezius, teres and infraspinatus, erector spinae, the gluteus
group, the leg biceps group at the back of the thighs, calves, and
feet. A detailed assessment of the various muscle groups should
be made during the comparisons, at which time it helps the judge
to compare muscle shape, density, and definition while still
bearing in mind the competitor’s overall balanced development.
The comparisons of the compulsory poses cannot be overemphasized
as these comparisons will help the judge to decide
which competitor has the superior physique from the standpoint of
muscular bulk, balanced development, muscular density and
definition.


While Kevin does enjoy some advantages in this pose as a whole when all things are assessed Dorian is easily beating him

Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 13, 2008, 02:23:48 PM
The pose genius , the entire pose . who has the better side triceps pose? Dorian does. he's Kevin getting destroyed in the side triceps POSE

Exactly!  Even if one were of the opinion that technically speaking, Levrone has superior triceps, what does it really matter if he is inferior in the actual side triceps pose?  Is there a consolation prize for losing the mandatory, but having better actual triceps?  Not that I am aware of.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:29:38 PM
Exactly!  Even if one were of the opinion that technically speaking, Levrone has superior triceps, what does it really matter if he is inferior in the actual side triceps pose?  Is there a consolation prize for loosing the mandatory, but being considered to have the better triceps?  Not that I am aware of.

That's what these morons can't seem to comprehend , all rounds are physique rounds which means ALL of the criteria is assessed at once , size , density , dryness , balance , proportion , posing , presentation , etc and while some guys meet parts of this criteria better than Yates NONE of them satisfied it ALL better than him

Kevin has better triceps , classic horseshoe , great side head , etc calves are just as important in this pose as triceps , are so is density and size and balance and dryness , does Kevin have a better side triceps shot? NO. it's the same way Dorian would beat Ronnie in a front double biceps shot despite not having better biceps
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: mesmorph78 on December 13, 2008, 02:34:26 PM
levrone wins the pose... dorian legs look thicker
 but dorian looks like a barrel
a keg to be more presise
levrone winns abs shoulders chest traps
dorian gets the nod for legs
shame about the barell
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:36:58 PM
levrone wins the pose... dorian legs look thicker
 but dorian looks like a barrel
a keg to be more presise
levrone winns abs shoulders chest traps
dorian gets the nod for legs
shame about the barell

Well once again your opinion contradicts the reality of the situation , Dorian won the contest with straight firsts in every single round .
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: The Ugly on December 13, 2008, 02:39:34 PM
That's what these morons can't seem to comprehend , all rounds are physique rounds which means ALL of the criteria is assessed at once , size , density , dryness , balance , proportion , posing , presentation , etc and while some guys meet parts of this criteria better than Yates NONE of them satisfied it ALL better than him

Kevin has better triceps , classic horseshoe , great side head , etc calves are just as important in this pose as triceps , are so is density and size and balance and dryness , does Kevin have a better side triceps shot? NO. it's the same way Dorian would beat Ronnie in a front double biceps shot despite not having better biceps

Do you ever wake up and say, 'Know what, fuck it, I just don't care enough today'?

 


Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:41:59 PM
Do you ever wake up and say, 'Know what, fuck it, I just don't care enough today'?

 




Oh there been plenty of threads I never stepped foot in , I don't mind debating the sport it's what these boards are for , when I get bored with these guys I move on and unlike them I don't only post on this topic .
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 13, 2008, 02:42:48 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=251919.0;attach=293199;image)

LOL

Kevin has bigger shoulders, arms, traps, chest, legs and a smaller waist, better lines, better abs and obliques
common ND hahahahahahahaha
blockyness does not equal beating someone in a pose

ND can't be too off base with such an assertion, being that Yates won with straight firsts in that contest.  His line of thinking, which I agree with myself, would seem to parallel that of the actual judges.  You know, the ones that hand out the Sandow. 
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:51:49 PM
ND can't be too off base with such an assertion, being that Yates won with straight firsts in that contest.  His line of thinking, which I agree with myself, would seem to parallel that of the actual judges.  You know, the ones that hand out the Sandow. 

99% of these guys base who looks better in a pose by personal preference , what they THINK should win a pose , what looks better to them from an aesthetic point of view . I used to ...until I learned how contests are judged , they'll cherry-pick what parts they like what they think is more important , what doesn't matter to them and say " see he wins " that's not how it works

Classic example of pumpster's claim calves & forearms don't count  ::) they ask for the calves in every single mandatory pose , in the criteria for the front double biceps pose they assess the forearms as well as the biceps , as well how proportionate one muscle is to the next , they assess who carries more muscular bulk , who is harder and drier who is the better technical poser , so while Ronnie & Levrone meet parts of this criteria better but when all things are judged they don't meet ALL of it better . that's how contests are judged and why Dorian dominated.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: sculpture on December 13, 2008, 02:52:37 PM
ND can't be too off base with such an assertion, being that Yates won with straight firsts in that contest.  His line of thinking, which I agree with myself, would seem to parallel that of the actual judges.  You know, the ones that hand out the Sandow. 

Shit! There i was thinking the judges were never wrong

Congratulations that you were in line with the judges opinions

Whats your thoughts on how they judged ronnies victories i'm intrigued?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: The Ugly on December 13, 2008, 02:53:08 PM
Oh there been plenty of threads I never stepped foot in , I don't mind debating the sport it's what these boards are

Which reminds me, who wins a debate, '93 Dorian or '03 Coleman?

Town hall style, let's say. Topic: Farm Subsidies.

Go!
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 13, 2008, 02:54:26 PM
Shit! There i was thinking the judges were never wrong

Congratulations that you were in line with the judges opinions

Whats your thoughts on how they judged ronnies victories i'm intrigued?

I don't buy fixed contests , Ronnie had a lot of close calls but I NEVER claimed they were fixed .
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Mr.1derful on December 13, 2008, 07:02:22 PM
99% of these guys base who looks better in a pose by personal preference , what they THINK should win a pose , what looks better to them from an aesthetic point of view . I used to ...until I learned how contests are judged , they'll cherry-pick what parts they like what they think is more important , what doesn't matter to them and say " see he wins " that's not how it works

Classic example of pumpster's claim calves & forearms don't count  ::) they ask for the calves in every single mandatory pose , in the criteria for the front double biceps pose they assess the forearms as well as the biceps , as well how proportionate one muscle is to the next , they assess who carries more muscular bulk , who is harder and drier who is the better technical poser , so while Ronnie & Levrone meet parts of this criteria better but when all things are judged they don't meet ALL of it better . that's how contests are judged and why Dorian dominated.

I couldn't agree more.  It is very easy to hand pick certain poses and make conclusions based upon one's own personal preferences. Many so-called experts will assert that one bodybuilder allegedly "owns" another in a pose, but are completely incapable of providing a substantive basis for their viewpoint. They can only reason that their choice, "looks better".  Hardly the most definitive manner by which to award a title.  If contests were to be judged in such a manner, we could have instances where every single judge hand picks a different winner based upon their own personal criteria. Instead, the champion is supposed to represent the bodybuilder that encompasses the best of EVERYTHING. 

When debating who the victor might be in a theoretical contest, most people fail to debate based upon how actual contests are judged. Instead, they substitute their own standards.  How can one realistically hypothesize who would win, if the judging parameters used in deducing a winner, are the antithesis of the guidelines that are used in actual contests?
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Danimal77 on December 13, 2008, 08:08:41 PM
dont know what pic your looking at but
levrone is murdering dorian in that pose....
blue murder

Like hell he is. Dorian was dry as granite. Kevin was large but smooth.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: pumpster on December 13, 2008, 08:10:20 PM
I don't buy fixed contests

He has a tremendous hardon to work for the IFBB with this crap.


Quote
Like hell he is. Dorian was dry as granite. Kevin was large but smooth.


He was in better condition than Levrone, but that wasn't the gist of the conversation about that pic.
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Gino30 on December 13, 2008, 08:35:48 PM
Ronnie have a very close relationship with the "oil"
Title: Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
Post by: Hulkster on December 14, 2008, 12:32:02 PM
Quote
blockyness does not equal beating someone in a pose

so true!