Author Topic: Dorian had better arms than coleman  (Read 34738 times)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #100 on: December 12, 2008, 02:00:52 PM »
dorian's arms looks better in the side tricep pose.... thats about it. His forearms are better, but arms as a whole....well...

I totally get what you're saying ! at least you get what I'm trying to say

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #101 on: December 12, 2008, 02:03:21 PM »
You're not intelligent enough to have an opinion that counts.  Getbig is probably the only place others will semi-tolerate your foolish drivel.  That said, everyone seems to be reaching a point of extreme frustration with your obsession of Dorian.

Let me sum it up for your feeble mind, ND.

Dorian had a very grainy physique, sported some awesome wheels and trained like a man possessed.  However, he had sub-par arms for a top pro bodybuilder and tore his bicep early in his Olympia reign.  He also had a big ol' belly and very little V-taper.  Dorian's legend is based off B&W pics taken very early in his career when he didn't have torn muscles and a training video where he moved heavy weights in a very strict and controlled fashion.  Dorian is an excellent bodybuilder, no doubt....but he's nowhere close to Ronnie.  NOT EVEN CLOSE.

I know you can't comprehend this, but I'm putting it out there anyway.  Maybe you'll be struck by lightening one day and come to your senses like the rest of getbig.


This is a great post

I totally get what you're saying ! at least you get what I'm trying to say

Unfortunatley you've been backtracking ever since you made the comment that because dorian has superior triceps and forearms (to you anyway) therefore he has better arms than coleman.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #102 on: December 12, 2008, 02:04:32 PM »
Coleman's arms made Dorian's looks like toothpicks...

Pithy

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #103 on: December 12, 2008, 02:07:35 PM »
This is a great post

Unfortunatley you've been backtracking ever since you made the comment that because dorian has superior triceps and forearms (to you anyway) therefore he has better arms than coleman.

and that wasn't a great post in the least , he didn't counter ANY of my claims , made blanket statements and used ad hominem attacks , Oh I get it now the exact same thing you do lol now wonder why you think it's great lol

I haven't back tracked first of all  ;) and the original statement was said tongue in cheek , I could care less about who has the best parts who has the best mandatory pose is what matters most  ;)

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #104 on: December 12, 2008, 02:10:26 PM »
ND, are you saying that Ronnie was missing the muscles at the end of his limbs?  ;D
no calves or forearms LOL

You need both to have outstanding balance & proportion

Brutal_1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7134
  • Your best is...
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #105 on: December 12, 2008, 02:12:52 PM »
You need both to have outstanding balance & proportion


Wait a minute, ND, who are you trying to defend with that outline....Coleman's shape owns Dorian's all day long
just not good enough

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #106 on: December 12, 2008, 02:13:41 PM »
Somebody doesn't have proportionate forearms to match the size of his biceps & triceps guess which one

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #107 on: December 12, 2008, 02:13:55 PM »
and that wasn't a great post in the least , he didn't counter ANY of my claims , made blanket statements and used ad hominem attacks , Oh I get it now the exact same thing you do lol now wonder why you think it's great lol

I haven't back tracked first of all  ;) and the original statement was said tongue in cheek , I could care less about who has the best parts who has the best mandatory pose is what matters most  ;)

And this is what they are - claims.

Spin it whatever way you wish nd, everyone here merely "entertains" your posts, claims, whatever

And you have backtracked. Infact you continue to do so.

There is no tongue in cheek in you

You truly believe the shit that you spout otherwise you wouldnt spend your life on here spouting.

You want to know the reason why its a great post - because to 99% of people it makes sense.

You unfortunately occupy the remaining 1%.

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #108 on: December 12, 2008, 02:14:03 PM »
I totally get what you're saying ! at least you get what I'm trying to say

Funny, that's exactly what i've been telling this blockhead for ages. Yates' only good arm shot is side-tri, because he can squeeze the arm against his side and make it look bigger.

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #109 on: December 12, 2008, 02:14:46 PM »
Somebody doesn't have proportionate biceps to match the size of his forearms & triceps guess which one

Fixed

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #110 on: December 12, 2008, 02:14:56 PM »

Wait a minute, ND, who are you trying to defend with that outline....Coleman's shape owns Dorian's all day long


hahaha it's been obvious now that ND can't see.

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #111 on: December 12, 2008, 02:15:06 PM »

Wait a minute, ND, who are you trying to defend with that outline....Coleman's shape owns Dorian's all day long

No it doesn't not by a long shot my by a country mile . Ronnie is a bunch of mis-matched parts , notice the glaring flaw of missing calves and forearms and how it makes Ronnie's pose incomplete

pumpster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18890
  • If you're reading this you have too much free time
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #112 on: December 12, 2008, 02:16:39 PM »
Somebody doesn't have proportionate forearms to match the size of his biceps & triceps guess which one

Forearms aren't supposed to be the same size as the upper arm the way they are with the bricklayer.

Utter lack of upper arm development when compared with someone with good arm development.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #113 on: December 12, 2008, 02:18:01 PM »
nd clearly... you are very biased when it comes to dorian
... u still cant tell me why dorian has never and will never be mentioned.. when it comes to greatest arms of all time... lists that bb experts compile....
you are not debating you are arguing just for arguing sake...
 :-\
choice is an illusion

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #114 on: December 12, 2008, 02:18:36 PM »
Somebody doesn't have proportionate forearms to match the size of his biceps & triceps guess which one

Looks good here

[img]

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #115 on: December 12, 2008, 02:18:50 PM »
And this is what they are - claims.

Spin it whatever way you wish nd, everyone here merely "entertains" your posts, claims, whatever

And you have backtracked. Infact you continue to do so.

There is no tongue in cheek in you

You truly believe the shit that you spout otherwise you wouldnt spend your life on here spouting.

You want to know the reason why its a great post - because to 99% of people it makes sense.

You unfortunately occupy the remaining 1%.

Don't presume to speak for me I said the comment was made tongue in cheek . and I didn't back track I'll still say he has better triceps & forearms wheres the back track? do I truly believe Dorian would beat Ronnie? absolutely and so does he , so I'm in great company

and again it wasn't a great post he was attacking the messenger because he doesn't like the message. and oh more dumb logic an appeal to numbers 99% of people on here think I'm wrong so I must be wrong lol


NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #116 on: December 12, 2008, 02:20:03 PM »
Forearms aren't supposed to be the same size as the upper arm the way they are with the bricklayer.

Utter lack of upper arm development when compared with someone with good arm development.

See Strawman , two things . this pic proves NOTHING and he's not at his best , change the angle and things become more clear


sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #117 on: December 12, 2008, 02:20:40 PM »
Don't presume to speak for me I said the comment was made tongue in cheek . and I didn't back track I'll still say he has better triceps & forearms wheres the back track? do I truly believe Dorian would beat Ronnie? absolutely and so does he , so I'm in great company

and again it wasn't a great post he was attacking the messenger because he doesn't like the message. and oh more dumb logic an appeal to numbers 99% of people on here think I'm wrong so I must be wrong lol



whats so dumb about that?

Are you suggesting you're right?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHa

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #118 on: December 12, 2008, 02:21:01 PM »
Fixed

Says you , but one of those guys have more balanced and proportioned arms and it isn't Coleman

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #119 on: December 12, 2008, 02:22:19 PM »
Looks good here

[img]

Less noticeable when he was lighter however still not in the league of Dorian AT HIS BEST please pay attention to the key word

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #120 on: December 12, 2008, 02:23:09 PM »
Looks good here

[img]

and FYI that's from 1996 when Dorian was destroying Ronnie on a regular basis  ;)

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #121 on: December 12, 2008, 02:23:36 PM »
Forearms aren't supposed to be the same size as the upper arm the way they are with the bricklayer.

Utter lack of upper arm development when compared with someone with good arm development.
thats what im tellin him huge huge forearms are for fat endomorphs....
...
when coleman pulled up his sleeve to reveal his 24 inch cannon..
dorian can roll up his sleeve all day long,.... to show those endomorph forearms .... u tell me who will get more stares...
thing is as well dorians arms were mediocre 20 inches at most ... so those huge forarms made those sub par arms look even smaller...
choice is an illusion

americanbulldog

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2681
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #122 on: December 12, 2008, 02:23:54 PM »
Yates versus Coleman, re arms, before injuries (both of them) Ronnie wins.  Post injury, Ronnie wins.  

sculpture

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2544
  • Getbig!
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #123 on: December 12, 2008, 02:24:39 PM »
and FYI that's from 1996 when Dorian was destroying Ronnie on a regular basis  ;)

your point

Your claim was an imbalance

I proved you wrong

Stop running

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 83366
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Dorian had better arms than coleman
« Reply #124 on: December 12, 2008, 02:24:56 PM »
whats so dumb about that?

Are you suggesting you're right?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHa

Thanks once again for proving my point , you offer up no counter points or arguments . you simply rely on faulty logic as your proof