Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on August 08, 2009, 05:40:32 PM

Title: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 08, 2009, 05:40:32 PM


nasser's 3rd place was recieved by the biggest and the strongest boo in the history of the sport ;)

the whole contest is now available on youtube for those who are interested..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 08, 2009, 05:47:35 PM


nasser's 3rd place was recieved by the biggest and the strongest boo in the history of the sport ;)

the whole contest is now available on youtube for those who are interested..

What would it matter, he was disqualified. 
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 05:52:38 PM


nasser's 3rd place was recieved by the biggest and the strongest boo in the history of the sport ;)

the whole contest is now available on youtube for those who are interested..

awesome quality Yates clear winner
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Big_Tymer on August 08, 2009, 05:54:19 PM
nasser got fucking robbed.  he was owning the shit out of ray and dorian.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 08, 2009, 05:54:53 PM
awesome quality Yates clear winner

Indeed.  Some of the shots from the rear of the stage from that contest show how utterly shredded Yates was. Not to mention complete. 

(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/dorian/dorian_yates_180_1996_4.jpg)

(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/dorian/dorian_yates_190_mro_1996_3.jpg)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: saucetradomous on August 08, 2009, 05:56:19 PM


"Your living in the past man..."
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 05:56:42 PM
nasser got fucking robbed.  he was owning the shit out of ray and dorian.

hahahah sure he was  ::) Dorian's conditioning raped Nassers
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 08, 2009, 05:57:14 PM


"Your living in the past man..."

That's f*cking awesome.  I was just thinking of posting that the other day. lol  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: saucetradomous on August 08, 2009, 06:03:50 PM
That's f*cking awesome.  I was just thinking of posting that the other day. lol  ;D

Seinfeld has a quote for everything.  "Your hung up on some clown from the 60's man"
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 08, 2009, 06:17:14 PM


nasser's 3rd place was recieved by the biggest and the strongest boo in the history of the sport ;)

the whole contest is now available on youtube for those who are interested..

do you even understand how mentally fucked everyone on here thinks you are.........i dont care if your nasshole posting as a gimmick, or some rag head muscle fag...............either way, you are fucking ill.......give it up, no one cares.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 06:26:09 PM
do you even understand how mentally fucked everyone on here thinks you are.........i dont care if your nasshole posting as a gimmick, or some rag head muscle fag...............either way, you are fucking ill.......give it up, no one cares.

HAHAHHA Nasser was popular , so he should have won , great logic  ::) that shows clearly how far Nasser was as well as the rest of the field
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: kiwiol on August 08, 2009, 06:29:44 PM
Dorian looks great. Huge difference between how he looks when he's standing "relaxed" and when he hits a pose, which makes his muscles pop. No one else has that happening to that kind of degree. Goes to show why guys like Hulkster are dead wrong when they use one or two pics of him in an unflattering angle to prove a point, when he looks completely different hitting a pose. No one is as dry and dense as he is, and his back separates him from the rest of the field.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 08, 2009, 06:31:10 PM
was that the year dorian tore his quads? even little shawn's quads are owning dorian's..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 06:34:33 PM
was that the year dorian tore his quads? even little shawn's quads are owning dorian's..

94 and Shawn always had really good quads , Dorian is destroying him and Nasser
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 08, 2009, 06:35:37 PM
Quote
Goes to show why guys like Hulkster are dead wrong when they use one or two pics of him in an unflattering angle to prove a point, when he looks completely different hitting a pose.

 ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: WillGrant on August 08, 2009, 06:36:02 PM
Indeed.  Some of the shots from the rear of the stage from that contest show how utterly shredded Yates was. Not to mention complete. 

(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/dorian/dorian_yates_180_1996_4.jpg)

(http://athlete.ru/fotos/profi/dorian/dorian_yates_190_mro_1996_3.jpg)
Jesus look at those calfs and how dry he is,his skin is like tissue paper  :o
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: kiwiol on August 08, 2009, 06:37:18 PM
::)

So you agree with me then, Hulkster? ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 08, 2009, 06:37:57 PM
Quote
Indeed.  Some of the shots from the rear of the stage from that contest show how utterly shredded Yates was. Not to mention complete.

LOL

only the nuthuggers are dumb enough to call someone with a torn missing bi and quads that bad 'complete'

but I guess in the world of delusion, that qualifies.. ::)

not knocking dorian, but the hype is just too blatant here..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 08, 2009, 06:38:34 PM
So you agree with me then, Hulkster? ;D

I call for a truce. :-*
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 06:39:17 PM
Dorian looks great. Huge difference between how he looks when he's standing "relaxed" and when he hits a pose, which makes his muscles pop. No one else has the happening to that kind of degree. Goes to show why guys like Hulkster are dead wrong when they use one or two pics of him in an unflattering angle to prove a point, when he looks completely different hitting a pose. No one is as dry and dense as he is, and his back separates him from the rest of the field.

Exactly VIDEO kills anything he can come up with as does eyewitness testimony

and Steve Blechman pointed that out about Yates one time , that he didn't look like anything special when just standing there but when he hit a pose it was night and day
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 06:42:01 PM
LOL

only the nuthuggers are dumb enough to call someone with a torn missing bi and quads that bad 'complete'

but I guess in the world of delusion, that qualifies.. ::)

not knocking dorian, but the hype is just too blatant here..

hahahahah not knocking Dorian that has been your ENTIRE GetBig history it's ALL you do ALL you know

delusion is a moron who claims Dorian lost in 93 and Ronnie was grainier than Dorian  ;)

Dorian destroyed everyone in 96 you can argue all you want about 97 but he murdered everyone in this contest
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 06:43:08 PM
I call for a truce. :-*

Good thing before you get owned again  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: BigBrianB on August 08, 2009, 06:43:34 PM
Sherif looking stupid again.  ;D  Only a person with very little intelligence and jealousy would cry day after day such as Sherif over a washed up bodybuilder who works in a garage. :D  Nasser is nothing more than a coward and a loser. He will never win nor did he ever. Team Nasser looking more and more desperate as fools and cowards and LIARS.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 06:45:51 PM
Sherif looking stupid again.  ;D  Only a person with very little intelligence and jealousy would cry day after day such as Sherif over a washed up bodybuilder who works in a garage. :D  Nasser is nothing more than a coward and a loser. He will never win nor did he ever. Team Nasser looking more and more desperate as fools and cowards and LIARS.

They can no longer claim he doesn't sell his used trunks  :-X major blow to team Nasser and I'm not talking about what they do to each other
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: BigBrianB on August 08, 2009, 06:54:34 PM
They can no longer claim he doesn't sell his used trunks  :-X major blow to team Nasser and I'm not talking about what they do to each other

So true, lie after lie with Team Nasser. There have been Great Arab champions such as Samir Bannout, but Nasser never could acheive that. All the past Olympia winners have very little to no respect for Nasser. He is widely known as a synthol and wife beater who sells used, dirty,soiled posing trunks to weird out of country men who are in there 30's and 40's such as Sherif and Bobs. Very pathetic and sad team. :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: kiwiol on August 08, 2009, 06:56:12 PM
major blow to team Nasser and I'm not talking about what they do to each other

Easily the funniest thing you've said, ND. ROFL!
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on August 08, 2009, 06:57:21 PM
suprised Nasser didnt beat Ray but Nasser's back was like a marshmellow compared to Yates and Ray
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 07:11:00 PM
So true, lie after lie with Team Nasser. There have been Great Arab champions such as Samir Bannout, but Nasser never could acheive that. All the past Olympia winners have very little to no respect for Nasser. He is widely known as a synthol and wife beater who sells used, dirty,soiled posing trunks to weird out of country men who are in there 30's and 40's such as Sherif and Bobs. Very pathetic and sad team. :-\

truth hurts  :-\ they think they;re doing damage control , they are just making this worse
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 07:21:35 PM
Easily the funniest thing you've said, ND. ROFL!


every once in while a blind squirrel finds a nut , in Nasser's used trunks lol
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: The_Hammer on August 08, 2009, 07:23:23 PM
Wow, I had always heard that 1996 was Yates' worst year, but he looks fucking sick in that video when he starts posing.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: BigBrianB on August 08, 2009, 07:24:22 PM
truth hurts  :-\ they think they;re doing damage control , they are just making this worse

Dorian's symmetry also DESTROYED Nasser. Nasser has no back and was never conditioned enough to beat the best. If we were talking about one close contest it would be something, but Dorian is a 6 time champion.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 08, 2009, 07:26:15 PM
those last three are some awesome shots of dorian................on e of the most loathsome things about the tactics of team nasshole............is how they take the most blurry photo they can come up with............or they put a picture up of everyone else happening to be standing relaxed, or in  a transitional pose..........while nasshole happens to be the only one flexing,,,,,,,,,or they will post shots where the depth is messed up, or the angle is fucked up, or nasshole is facing the camera, while the rest are facig in the opposite direction.

the most dispicable is what they do with yates shots................... .there are hundreds of thousands of photos from every olympia..............the y always find the ones where dorian might be exhaling, or correcting his posture for a moment, then they compare these shots to the all-time best photos nasshole has ever taken.

they are so fucking retarded and transparent............. ...dirty arab schmoes
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 07:49:22 PM
HARD AS NAILS  :o
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 07:51:25 PM
sick ass shots  :o  :o  :o

after watching this video I mean how can anyone claim Yates should have lost?  ???
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 07:55:23 PM
those last three are some awesome shots of dorian................on e of the most loathsome things about the tactics of team nasshole............is how they take the most blurry photo they can come up with............or they put a picture up of everyone else happening to be standing relaxed, or in  a transitional pose..........while nasshole happens to be the only one flexing,,,,,,,,,or they will post shots where the depth is messed up, or the angle is fucked up, or nasshole is facing the camera, while the rest are facig in the opposite direction.

the most dispicable is what they do with yates shots................... .there are hundreds of thousands of photos from every olympia..............the y always find the ones where dorian might be exhaling, or correcting his posture for a moment, then they compare these shots to the all-time best photos nasshole has ever taken.

they are so fucking retarded and transparent............. ...dirty arab schmoes

exactly , post a couple of very carefully selected pics and say he lost an entire contest lol video murders them especially very good quality video Hulkster too that dummy
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: kiwiol on August 08, 2009, 07:57:09 PM
sick ass shots  :o  :o  :o

after watching this video I mean how can anyone claim Yates should have lost?  ???

None of those guys, Nasser included, ever said anything about Dorian's win being unfair at that time. The most people ever complained about was how he had missing / torn bodyparts, but that was pretty common during that era, when most of the top pros were tearing each other apart due to all the mini rivalries going on between them - Dorian vs Shawn, Shawn vs Flex, Flex vs Nasser, Nasser vs Dorian and so forth.

It's only after Dorian retired that some of the guys began talking about racism and other BS being responsible for his wins. Truth is, everyone had flaws - Dorian had his arm, Shawn his lack of size / height, Nasser had his back, K Lo had his conditioning and so on. But overall, Dorian still looked better than all of the guys in enough poses to win comfortably. Only Olympia of his where it was close was 97.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 08, 2009, 08:06:44 PM
None of those guys, Nasser included, ever said anything about Dorian's win being unfair at that time. The most people ever complained about was how he had missing / torn bodyparts, but that was pretty common during that era, when most of the top pros were tearing each other apart due to all the mini rivalries going on between them - Dorian vs Shawn, Shawn vs Flex, Flex vs Nasser, Nasser vs Dorian and so forth.

It's only after Dorian retired that some of the guys began talking about racism and other BS being responsible for his wins. Truth is, everyone had flaws - Dorian had his arm, Shawn his lack of size / height, Nasser had his back, K Lo had his conditioning and so on. But overall, Dorian still looked better than all of the guys in enough poses to win comfortably. Only Olympia of his where it was close was 97.

Well said ! Shawn in 97 complained Dorian should have won with perfect scores NOT that he shouldn't have won at all .

Dorian was the clear winner until 97
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: WillGrant on August 08, 2009, 08:39:25 PM
You guys need to get out the house a bit more , this shit happened 15 odd years ago , let it go you cant change history  :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: IceCold on August 08, 2009, 08:52:52 PM
Dorian looks great. Huge difference between how he looks when he's standing "relaxed" and when he hits a pose, which makes his muscles pop. No one else has the happening to that kind of degree. Goes to show why guys like Hulkster are dead wrong when they use one or two pics of him in an unflattering angle to prove a point, when he looks completely different hitting a pose. No one is as dry and dense as he is, and his back separates him from the rest of the field.


hahaha.

hulkster owned.

like always.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 08, 2009, 09:08:13 PM
Quote
post a couple of very carefully selected pics and say he lost an entire contest

anyone else see the irony and hypocrisy of ND typing this while posting shots like this?:

 ::)

these guys hit new lows all the time.

fact is, shawns back was not as bad as ND's 'carefully selected shots' indicate:

his back double bi was fantastic:
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 08, 2009, 09:15:05 PM
exactly , post a couple of very carefully selected pics and say he lost an entire contest lol video murders them especially very good quality video Hulkster too that dummy

yet more irony, now ND is campaigning for the power of the video tape..

yet in the dorian ronnie wars he does everything he can to try and discredit video clips of Ronnie (esp. 1999)

 ::)

he only acknowledges the videos when they work to dorian's advantage, every other time, he says the videos don't matter...and shoves a delusonal Mcgough quote down our throats -one that is thoroughly and soundly disproved by the video clips..lol

 ::)

this guy is unreal.. :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 08, 2009, 09:53:51 PM
yet more irony, now ND is campaigning for the power of the video tape..

yet in the dorian ronnie wars he does everything he can to try and discredit video clips of Ronnie (esp. 1999)

 ::)

he only acknowledges the videos when they work to dorian's advantage, every other time, he says the videos don't matter...and shoves a delusonal Mcgough quote down our throats -one that is thoroughly and soundly disproved by the video clips..lol

 ::)

this guy is unreal.. :-\

Correction.  ND, prioritizes first hand testimony (when available) over video and photographic evidence, which makes sense.  You on the other hand, dispute first hand accounts in favor of your little array of sharpened photos, which makes you a simpleton.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 08, 2009, 10:20:46 PM
Quote
ND, prioritizes first hand testimony (when available) over video and photographic evidence, which makes sense

LOL you have no concept that humans can be mistaken.

a video camera knows no such thing.
thats the point.

you idiots will never understand.

talk is cheap - it needs to be corroborated by visuals to be verified.

otherwise, it is pure bullshit. nothing more.

and many of McGough's gems are classic examples of human error and ill recollections. fully expoited by pics and videos..

thank god for the camera and video recorder.

it takes away the human error factor from the sport.

ND, when it fits his agenda, choses not to recognize this, and insist the opinions to be correct, even though all visuals show otherwise.. ::)


Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 08, 2009, 10:26:52 PM
LOL you have no concept that humans can be mistaken.


I get a perfect example of it every time I read one of your posts.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 08, 2009, 10:31:29 PM
no, because my opinions are always backed up with real corroborating visual evidence.

no bullshit from me. :P
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 08, 2009, 10:32:07 PM
no, because my opinions are always backed up with real corroborating visual evidence.

no bullshit from me. :P


As I was saying....
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: johnny1 on August 08, 2009, 10:35:25 PM
Dorian looks great. Huge difference between how he looks when he's standing "relaxed" and when he hits a pose, which makes his muscles pop. No one else has that happening to that kind of degree. Goes to show why guys like Hulkster are dead wrong when they use one or two pics of him in an unflattering angle to prove a point, when he looks completely different hitting a pose. No one is as dry and dense as he is, and his back separates him from the rest of the field.
Yes this is true as in when Dorian is standing still he looks good....when he actually hits a pose his muscles do indeed "pop" and he looks outstanding espeacally when he's as dry and dence as he was in 1996 somewhat more steamlined than past years but still very very impressive, on a different note IMO Nassers FDB was outstanding in 1996 :o :o :o
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bodybuilder1234 on August 08, 2009, 10:55:35 PM
HARD AS NAILS  :o

Dorian is very dry there but his left arm looks to be around 12 inches
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 08, 2009, 11:10:51 PM
It’s crystal clear that this is the first time for you all to watch this contest, same with me.. i made this thread mainly to let every one see this “rare” contest before they remove it from youtube..

of course I am not astonished to read all your stupid comments as I was expecting them because I know how hatred has made most of you towards me or towards any other arab or muslim.. if I was not muslim/arab and nasser was not half arab and muslim you guys wouldn’t have shown this amount of hatred towards me.. still this didn’t prevent me from notifying you to watch the contest which I am sure many of you wanted to watch..

IMO nasser deserved to win,.. not because I like him more, but because he was the best.. if I was not neutral I wouldn’t have said that dorian was better in 1995 as I already mentioned many times before..
 
Nasser from the front on that day was untouchable, no one came close to his level.. either his upper body or his lower body.. he was ahead of them all from the front the same way dorian was always ahead of them all in the 2 back shots.. so as always nasser was much better than dorian from the front and dorian was much better from the back.. but I go with nasser because all his seen muscles from the front were clearly  better and bigger than dorian’s while from the back, only dorian’s back muscle was better than nasser’s back muscle.. nasser’s arms, shoulder’s, hams were all better and bigger.. calves were nearly the same..

Of course dorian’s condition was great here but he was not as full as in 1995, he looked clearly flat specially beside nasser.. his shoulders looked small beside most of the other guys,.. his quads too were small and lacked details.. shawn ray was shawn ray, same good shape as 94 and 95 so I don’t know how they placed him after nasser in 1995 then ahead of a clearly improved nasser in 1996!!..

it’s funny that no one noticed how Yates was avoiding nasser in the posedown!!.. it happened clearly 2 times and in each time nasser was looking to the audience in astonishment!!..

The audience who booed nasser’s place were American and European like most of you, I am not saying they all saw nasser as the winner but some saw him as the winner and some saw him as the runner up.. ppl in these days were seeing things as they were without interfering religion or origin..

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: keanu on August 08, 2009, 11:30:41 PM


nasser's 3rd place was recieved by the biggest and the strongest boo in the history of the sport ;)

the whole contest is now available on youtube for those who are interested..

Nasser's boos weren't much louder then Levrone's and no where close to 1980 when Arnold got booed and people were screaming fix from the audience. A major US network ( yes bodybuilding actually used to get air time) went halfway around the world for that one and didn't bother to air it because they also thought it was fixed.

  As for Nasser getting screwed, in 1996 his conditon was off. 2 men stood in front of him, not just Yates. In 1997 however, it could very well have been his. Yates was way off, and Nasser was totally on. If Nasser wasn't a balding, cross eyed Arab with glasses, but had the face of say Jay Cutler, he wins in 97. He would be tough to market.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: BigBrianB on August 08, 2009, 11:36:15 PM
It’s crystal clear that this is the first time for you all to watch this contest, same with me.. i made this thread mainly to let every one see this “rare” contest before they remove it from youtube..

of course I am not astonished to read all your stupid comments as I was expecting them because I know how hatred has made most of you towards me or towards any other arab or muslim.. if I was not muslim/arab and nasser was not half arab and muslim you guys wouldn’t have shown this amount of hatred towards me.. still this didn’t prevent me from notifying you to watch the contest which I am sure many of you wanted to watch..

IMO nasser deserved to win,.. not because I like him more, but because he was the best.. if I was not neutral I wouldn’t have said that dorian was better in 1995 as I already mentioned many times before..
 
Nasser from the front on that day was untouchable, no one came close to his level.. either his upper body or his lower body.. he was ahead of them all from the front the same way dorian was always ahead of them all in the 2 back shots.. so as always nasser was much better than dorian from the front and dorian was much better from the back.. but I go with nasser because all his seen muscles from the front were clearly  better and bigger than dorian’s while from the back, only dorian’s back muscle was better than nasser’s back muscle.. nasser’s arms, shoulder’s, hams were all better and bigger.. calves were nearly the same..

Of course dorian’s condition was great here but he was not as full as in 1995, he looked clearly flat specially beside nasser.. his shoulders looked small beside most of the other guys,.. his quads too were small and lacked details.. shawn ray was shawn ray, same good shape as 94 and 95 so I don’t know how they placed him after nasser in 1995 then ahead of a clearly improved nasser in 1996!!..

it’s funny that no one noticed how Yates was avoiding nasser in the posedown!!.. it happened clearly 2 times and in each time nasser was looking to the audience in astonishment!!..

The audience who booed nasser’s place were American and European like most of you, I am not saying they all saw nasser as the winner but some saw him as the winner and some saw him as the runner up.. ppl in these days were seeing things as they were without interfering religion or origin..



Does this mean you will finally leave? ???  Don't let the door hit you on the way out pussy. :D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: alnassak on August 08, 2009, 11:46:11 PM
That Video Proves that Dorian was the clear winner …..  :D

I am serious here he was the clear winner ……. To win the LAST PLACE....  ;D

There is nothing in the Whole World that can make\made that happen except “POLITICS”  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NotMrAverage on August 08, 2009, 11:56:34 PM
That was a great video of epic thong exhibition. I´ve seen it like 10 years ago, but did´nt remember it too well. Dorian rocked on conditioning but Nasser had greater mass and looked better from the front. I think he should have been ahead of that bald dwarf Ray. Flex looked very smoth in this one. Ronnie deserved higher.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 02:15:51 AM
Does this mean you will finally leave? ???  Don't let the door hit you on the way out pussy. :D

but if i leave idiots like you who come here only to put shit in my threads will stop posting too!! :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 02:16:46 AM
That Video Proves that Dorian was the clear winner …..  :D

I am serious here he was the clear winner ……. To win the LAST PLACE....  ;D

There is nothing in the Whole World that can make\made that happen except “POLITICS”  ;)


 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 02:20:52 AM
That was a great video of epic thong exhibition. I´ve seen it like 10 years ago, but did´nt remember it too well. Dorian rocked on conditioning but Nasser had greater mass and looked better from the front. I think he should have been ahead of that bald dwarf Ray. Flex looked very smoth in this one. Ronnie deserved higher.

i agree that ronnie deserved a higher place.. i already mentioned this in a separate thread that he deserved to beat an off flex and also paul dillet who was in a great condition but his natural flaws should have put him after ronnie who was in a great shape.. kevin levrone too was clearly off but still IMO deserved his 4th place..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Immortal_Technique on August 09, 2009, 03:43:17 AM
awesome quality Yates clear winner

X 2

I love those old videos. Nasser does look seriously good from the front, would you say better than Yates? I know from the back is a different league, but Nasser didn't have stupid oily arms yet and is crazy hard from the front, just issues with condition from the back.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 03:46:47 AM
X 2

I love those old videos. Nasser does look seriously good from the front, would you say better than Yates? I know from the back is a different league, but Nasser didn't have stupid oily arms yet and is crazy hard from the front, just issues with condition from the back.

what??.. are you really asking!!
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Meso_z on August 09, 2009, 04:09:33 AM


nasser's 3rd place was recieved by the biggest and the strongest boo in the history of the sport ;)

the whole contest is now available on youtube for those who are interested..

You dirty arab  ::)muscleworshiper give it up already, you and your butt buddies are doing nasser more harm than good
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 04:32:03 AM
yet more irony, now ND is campaigning for the power of the video tape..

yet in the dorian ronnie wars he does everything he can to try and discredit video clips of Ronnie (esp. 1999)

 ::)

he only acknowledges the videos when they work to dorian's advantage, every other time, he says the videos don't matter...and shoves a delusonal Mcgough quote down our throats -one that is thoroughly and soundly disproved by the video clips..lol

 ::)

this guy is unreal.. :-\

I always said video was more accurate than pics ( old news ) and NOTHING beats being there live and in person ( duh ) I never discredited the 99 Olympia video just the PHOTOSHOPPED screencaps you were busted using by Kevin Horton who was at that contest and said the screencaps YOU kept posting weren't accurate  ;) so once again even video can be tampered with

and you have to know what you're talking about as usual , after watching the videos you came to the insanely idiotic conclusion Dorian lost the 1993 Olympia to Flex and Ronnie dominated the 2001 , you know what again?

nothing
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: ANAL DISCHARGE on August 09, 2009, 04:35:02 AM
Kill rag heads.  Eat their skulls.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 04:37:00 AM
anyone else see the irony and hypocrisy of ND typing this while posting shots like this?:

 ::)

these guys hit new lows all the time.

fact is, shawns back was not as bad as ND's 'carefully selected shots' indicate:

his back double bi was fantastic:

That shot wasn't supposed to be a dig on Shawn it was supposed to highlight Yates' back , another case of you drawing your own conclusions

and the irony of YOU of all people complaining about biased comparisons it's your entire GetBig history , stop fishing for an angle , every time a good quality video of Yates come around we can always count on you for a MELTDOWN

who cares about Shawn or his back double biceps? Dorian destroys him anyway
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 04:51:16 AM
You dirty arab  ::)muscleworshiper give it up already, you and your butt buddies are doing nasser more harm than good

yes mother fuker and this is why the facebook page i made about nasser has attracted about 1500 fans in few months!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 04:51:30 AM
LOL you have no concept that humans can be mistaken.

a video camera knows no such thing.
thats the point.

you idiots will never understand.

talk is cheap - it needs to be corroborated by visuals to be verified.

otherwise, it is pure bullshit. nothing more.

and many of McGough's gems are classic examples of human error and ill recollections. fully expoited by pics and videos..

thank god for the camera and video recorder.

it takes away the human error factor from the sport.

ND, when it fits his agenda, choses not to recognize this, and insist the opinions to be correct, even though all visuals show otherwise.. ::)




LOL you have no concept that humans can be mistaken.


but humans at home on their PC can't  ::) you're the same idiot who claimed you're just as qualified to judge a contest via pics at home without ever seeing the guys in real life


a video camera knows no such thing.
thats the point.

nonsense angles , quality , the fact that some people look better live & in person than they do in pics & video , the fact that people can tamper with videos , case in point all the screencaps YOU were busted by Kevin Horton who was there and said sorry not accurate , once again you're dead wrong and spoken like a man who was NEVER at a pro contest then having the balls to tell the people who were they are wrong , majorly stupid

you idiots will never understand.

talk is cheap - it needs to be corroborated by visuals to be verified.

otherwise, it is pure bullshit. nothing more.


we fully understand how cheap talk is you remind us everytime you post  ;) people who were live and in attendance matter the most people who sit at home on their PC looking at photoshopped screencaps thinking they have it all figured out telling people who were there are wrong is pure bullshit , again something you know full well

and many of McGough's gems are classic examples of human error and ill recollections. fully expoited by pics and videos..

thank god for the camera and video recorder.

it takes away the human error factor from the sport.

lmfao human error thanks again for proving how ignorant you truly are , despite never once being at any contest you're going to tell a guy whit more professional bodybuilding experience then you have life he's wrong and you're right LMMFAO I'll leave you to look as dumb as you always do with these statements


ND, when it fits his agenda, choses not to recognize this, and insist the opinions to be correct, even though all visuals show otherwise.. ::)

yes the visuals you keep clinging to brought you to the conclusion , Dorian lost the 1993 Mr Olympia to Flex Wheeler , it also brought you to the conclusion Ronnie had more detailed calves than Dorian too , and Ronnie 99 was grainier than Dorian ever was , he was better balanced , oh and he dominated the 2001 Olympia by losing the whole prejudging , oh and this gem 1998 Olympia wasn't a close contest despite being won just just 3 points , you don't have the slightest clue on what you're talking about , what was that about ' human error ' oh that doesn't apply to you lmfao once again you're in stark contrast to reality and the judges , nothing new

run along and live in your fantasy world it's all you have
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 04:53:32 AM

hahaha.

hulkster owned.

like always.

like always  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Meso_z on August 09, 2009, 04:53:48 AM
yes mother fuker and this is why the facebook page i made about nasser has attracted about 1500 fans in few months!!..

saick arab worm
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 04:59:29 AM
Correction.  ND, prioritizes first hand testimony (when available) over video and photographic evidence, which makes sense.  You on the other hand, dispute first hand accounts in favor of your little array of sharpened photos, which makes you a simpleton.

It's amazing how easily you get it and this idiot can't !

people who were there are wrong and his photoshopped pics are right lol he lives in Bizzaro world
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 05:14:24 AM
here ronnie's biggest ass licker and dorian's biggest cok sucker have trurned the thread to be another dorian vs. ronnie thread!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 05:16:33 AM
here ronnie's biggest ass licker and dorian's biggest cok sucker have trurned the thread to be another dorian vs. ronnie thread!!..

both of them do this daily on different threads and no one comments but when i make a thread about nasser every month or so ;D you son of bitches all attack me!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 05:24:13 AM
of course I am not astonished to read all your stupid comments as I was expecting them because I know how hatred has made most of you towards me or towards any other arab or muslim.. if I was not muslim/arab and nasser was not half arab and muslim you guys wouldn’t have shown this amount of hatred towards me.. still this didn’t prevent me from notifying you to watch the contest which I am sure many of you wanted to watch..
Nasser is not Arab, and could, at best, be termed a non-practicing Muslim. Nothing to be heralded, nor ashamed of.  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:24:26 AM
It’s crystal clear that this is the first time for you all to watch this contest, same with me.. i made this thread mainly to let every one see this “rare” contest before they remove it from youtube..

of course I am not astonished to read all your stupid comments as I was expecting them because I know how hatred has made most of you towards me or towards any other arab or muslim.. if I was not muslim/arab and nasser was not half arab and muslim you guys wouldn’t have shown this amount of hatred towards me.. still this didn’t prevent me from notifying you to watch the contest which I am sure many of you wanted to watch..

IMO nasser deserved to win,.. not because I like him more, but because he was the best.. if I was not neutral I wouldn’t have said that dorian was better in 1995 as I already mentioned many times before..
 
Nasser from the front on that day was untouchable, no one came close to his level.. either his upper body or his lower body.. he was ahead of them all from the front the same way dorian was always ahead of them all in the 2 back shots.. so as always nasser was much better than dorian from the front and dorian was much better from the back.. but I go with nasser because all his seen muscles from the front were clearly  better and bigger than dorian’s while from the back, only dorian’s back muscle was better than nasser’s back muscle.. nasser’s arms, shoulder’s, hams were all better and bigger.. calves were nearly the same..

Of course dorian’s condition was great here but he was not as full as in 1995, he looked clearly flat specially beside nasser.. his shoulders looked small beside most of the other guys,.. his quads too were small and lacked details.. shawn ray was shawn ray, same good shape as 94 and 95 so I don’t know how they placed him after nasser in 1995 then ahead of a clearly improved nasser in 1996!!..

it’s funny that no one noticed how Yates was avoiding nasser in the posedown!!.. it happened clearly 2 times and in each time nasser was looking to the audience in astonishment!!..

The audience who booed nasser’s place were American and European like most of you, I am not saying they all saw nasser as the winner but some saw him as the winner and some saw him as the runner up.. ppl in these days were seeing things as they were without interfering religion or origin..



It’s crystal clear that this is the first time for you all to watch this contest, same with me.. i made this thread mainly to let every one see this “rare” contest before they remove it from youtube..

nonsense you made another Nasser hero worship thread in which you highlighted he got the most louds boos because of his placing , which doesn't matter because you did post the contest which is great quality for a change

IMO nasser deserved to win,.. not because I like him more, but because he was the best.. if I was not neutral I wouldn’t have said that dorian was better in 1995 as I already mentioned many times before..

in your mind he did , he looked like a winner FROM THE FRONT he was far from the best man at that contest especially from the back holy cow , and you're NOT neutral you're very biased almost as much as Hulkster every thread you post is almost ( key world almost ) related to Nasser and you think admitting 1995 Yates was the winner is doing anyone a favor? it's painfully obvious he was clear cut winner in 95 he dominated that contest , you can't deny 95 that likes denying 93 ( Hulkster did ) so maybe you're not as bad as he is , I enjoy a lot of your threads you seem like a good guy but you're as biased as they come and nothing wrong with that just don't type you're not

Nasser from the front on that day was untouchable, no one came close to his level.. either his upper body or his lower body.. he was ahead of them all from the front the same way dorian was always ahead of them all in the 2 back shots.. so as always nasser was much better than dorian from the front and dorian was much better from the back.. but I go with nasser because all his seen muscles from the front were clearly  better and bigger than dorian’s while from the back, only dorian’s back muscle was better than nasser’s back muscle.. nasser’s arms, shoulder’s, hams were all better and bigger.. calves were nearly the same..

I ( and the judges ) disagree , Nasser's front double biceps was clearly better than Dorians , front latspread nope , ab-thigh very competitive with Dorians and maybe better , from the sides Yates from the back Yates , old news Dorian looks better from all angles

Of course dorian’s condition was great here but he was not as full as in 1995, he looked clearly flat specially beside nasser.. his shoulders looked small beside most of the other guys,.. his quads too were small and lacked details.. shawn ray was shawn ray, same good shape as 94 and 95 so I don’t know how they placed him after nasser in 1995 then ahead of a clearly improved nasser in 1996!!..


Dorian wasn't as good as he was in 95 true , he wasn't competing against Dorian 95 he was competing against the others which he was clearly better than , Nasser is one dimensional , outstanding from the front , good from the sides and horrible from the back hence why he never did that great as a pro , Shawn killed him from the back despite being smaller

it’s funny that no one noticed how Yates was avoiding nasser in the posedown!!.. it happened clearly 2 times and in each time nasser was looking to the audience in astonishment!!..

Yates actually addressed this said he never even seen him and notice he did stand side-by-side with him , Nasser was chasing Dorian , not the other way around , Nasser playing follower Dorian leader  ;)

The audience who booed nasser’s place were American and European like most of you, I am not saying they all saw nasser as the winner but some saw him as the winner and some saw him as the runner up.. ppl in these days were seeing things as they were without interfering religion or origin..

he was very popular because of his size he was a freak and that what the audience loved , I'm sure a lot of them felt he did win , who cares ? they don't judge contests they known what they like much like you and Hulkster
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:28:57 AM
here ronnie's biggest ass licker and dorian's biggest cok sucker have trurned the thread to be another dorian vs. ronnie thread!!..

You're Dorian's biggest guy you're obsessed with him almost as much as Nasser it's your whole GetBig career  ;)

and Hulkster turned it into another VS thread he meltdown everytime any new good quality footage of Yates comes out , nothing new

and the irony of you calling anyone a ass licker and guy  ;) that's a prerequisite to be in Team Nasser , used trunks optional  :-X
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:31:21 AM
both of them do this daily on different threads and no one comments but when i make a thread about nasser every month or so ;D you son of bitches all attack me!!..

lmfao responding to your own post

unlike YOU and Hulkster I post in a LOT of other varying threads , all you know is Nasser Vs Dorian and him Ronnie , it's all you know
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 05:34:43 AM
lmfao responding to your own post

unlike YOU and Hulkster I post in a LOT of other varying threads , all you know is Nasser Vs Dorian and him Ronnie , it's all you know
That's bobs slipping up again. Happens occasionally when you run gimmicks.  ;) 
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:38:45 AM
That's bobs slipping up again. Happens occasionally when you run gimmicks.  ;) 

I always figured he was a gimmick but Bobs? lol makes sense
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 05:43:57 AM
It’s crystal clear that this is the first time for you all to watch this contest, same with me.. i made this thread mainly to let every one see this “rare” contest before they remove it from youtube..

nonsense you made another Nasser hero worship thread in which you highlighted he got the most louds boos because of his placing , which doesn't matter because you did post the contest which is great quality for a change

IMO nasser deserved to win,.. not because I like him more, but because he was the best.. if I was not neutral I wouldn’t have said that dorian was better in 1995 as I already mentioned many times before..

in your mind he did , he looked like a winner FROM THE FRONT he was far from the best man at that contest especially from the back holy cow , and you're NOT neutral you're very biased almost as much as Hulkster every thread you post is almost ( key world almost ) related to Nasser and you think admitting 1995 Yates was the winner is doing anyone a favor? it's painfully obvious he was clear cut winner in 95 he dominated that contest , you can't deny 95 that likes denying 93 ( Hulkster did ) so maybe you're not as bad as he is , I enjoy a lot of your threads you seem like a good guy but you're as biased as they come and nothing wrong with that just don't type you're not

Nasser from the front on that day was untouchable, no one came close to his level.. either his upper body or his lower body.. he was ahead of them all from the front the same way dorian was always ahead of them all in the 2 back shots.. so as always nasser was much better than dorian from the front and dorian was much better from the back.. but I go with nasser because all his seen muscles from the front were clearly  better and bigger than dorian’s while from the back, only dorian’s back muscle was better than nasser’s back muscle.. nasser’s arms, shoulder’s, hams were all better and bigger.. calves were nearly the same..

I ( and the judges ) disagree , Nasser's front double biceps was clearly better than Dorians , front latspread nope , ab-thigh very competitive with Dorians and maybe better , from the sides Yates from the back Yates , old news Dorian looks better from all angles

Of course dorian’s condition was great here but he was not as full as in 1995, he looked clearly flat specially beside nasser.. his shoulders looked small beside most of the other guys,.. his quads too were small and lacked details.. shawn ray was shawn ray, same good shape as 94 and 95 so I don’t know how they placed him after nasser in 1995 then ahead of a clearly improved nasser in 1996!!..


Dorian wasn't as good as he was in 95 true , he wasn't competing against Dorian 95 he was competing against the others which he was clearly better than , Nasser is one dimensional , outstanding from the front , good from the sides and horrible from the back hence why he never did that great as a pro , Shawn killed him from the back despite being smaller

it’s funny that no one noticed how Yates was avoiding nasser in the posedown!!.. it happened clearly 2 times and in each time nasser was looking to the audience in astonishment!!..

Yates actually addressed this said he never even seen him and notice he did stand side-by-side with him , Nasser was chasing Dorian , not the other way around , Nasser playing follower Dorian leader  ;)

The audience who booed nasser’s place were American and European like most of you, I am not saying they all saw nasser as the winner but some saw him as the winner and some saw him as the runner up.. ppl in these days were seeing things as they were without interfering religion or origin..

he was very popular because of his size he was a freak and that what the audience loved , I'm sure a lot of them felt he did win , who cares ? they don't judge contests they known what they like much like you and Hulkster

i said i am neutral when judging a contest but i am not neutral when posting more about nasser.. yes nasser is my favorite and nothing is bad about that..

believe it or not but nasser is my favorite not because he is muslim and not because he is half arab.. ahmed haidar and mustafa mahmoud are both fully muslims and arabs but i rarely post anything about them although in many occasions both of them were underrated.. simply because they are not from my favorites.. may be the only other arab bodybuilder whom i sometimes praise is samir bannout who is christian because i really like him as a great bodybuilder!!..

my point is that i dont care about religion or race when talking about bodybuilding.. these idiots always attack me with religious insults and i never answer the same way.. i know it may be crazy to make all these threads about nasser but so what??.. we are all here to have fun and exchange thoughts.. it's ok not to like my lot of threads about nasser and ok to comment in a funny sarcastic way but it's stupid to hate me or to attack nasser because of our religion!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 05:48:10 AM
That's bobs slipping up again. Happens occasionally when you run gimmicks.  ;) 

no mr. moneky :D i just wanted to add somthing that came to my mind so i did so instead of modifying my first post :)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 05:49:07 AM
I always figured he was a gimmick but Bobs? lol makes sense
Wait'll Sharma gets logged on, and then this thread'll really be cooking with gasoline.  :D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 05:53:02 AM
great thread as ususal from sherief shal.... ops i have forgotten to change the account.. now i go to bobs or sharmas account :-X :-\ ;D

you guys are assholes if you really think i am a gimmick
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 05:54:03 AM
no mr. moneky :D i just wanted to add somthing that came to my mind so i did so instead of modifying my first post :)
Morning bobs. You're up early.   ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 06:03:56 AM
great thread as ususal from sherief shal.... ops i have forgotten to change the account.. now i go to bobs or sharmas account :-X :-\ ;D

you guys are assholes if you really think i am a gimmick
ORLY!? Well, you fit every parameter for a gimmick account. Who's fault is that?   ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:05:06 AM
Nasser is not Arab, and could, at best, be termed a non-practicing Muslim. Nothing to be heralded, nor ashamed of.  ;)

i believe 90% of all christains in the world can be called non-practicing christians ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:07:19 AM
ORLY!? Well, you fit every parameter for a gimmick account. Who's fault is that?   ;)

plz mention all the parameters to avoid them with my new gimmick i am about to create :P :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 06:08:46 AM
i believe 90% of all christains in the world can be called non-practicing christians ;D
Well, if you mean they don't practice what they preach, I agree. Religious hypocrisy is about the worst type of hypocrisy.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 06:11:58 AM
great thread as ususal from sherief shal.... ops i have forgotten to change the account.. now i go to bobs or sharmas account :-X :-\ ;D

you guys are assholes if you really think i am a gimmick

Lets see it says you're in Egypt and the local time according to your account isn't the local time in Egypt it's 2 full hours behind , ironically your local time is the exact same time as BigBobs  ;) which is in Vancouver , not sure if Bobs is from there

you and Sharma are painfully obvious gimmicks no doubts about it
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr Nobody on August 09, 2009, 06:14:35 AM
Well, if you mean they don't practice what they preach, I agree. Religious hypocrisy is about the worst type of hypocrisy.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:18:04 AM
Lets see it says you're in Egypt and the local time according to your account isn't the local time in Egypt it's 2 full hours behind , ironically your local time is the exact same time as BigBobs  ;) which is in Vancouver , not sure if Bobs is from there

you and Sharma are painfully obvious gimmicks no doubts about it

man i really dont care that much if you believe me or not but i swear to ALLAH that i have no gimmicks and i am not a gimmick of anyone and i will never be.. if it's important for you to know you can check matt c forums as i was posting there under my same name from 2004..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:20:57 AM
as for the time difference matter it's exactly 16:19 pm here now if your are from europe you are 1-2 hours earlier or in some countries the same time.. usa is still waking up now..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 06:31:56 AM
as for the time difference matter it's exactly 16:19 pm here now if your are from europe you are 1-2 hours earlier or in some countries the same time.. usa is still waking up now..

it's 4:31 in Egypt and thats NOT what it says for local time in your profile  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:37:49 AM
it's 4:31 in Egypt and thats NOT what it says for local time in your profile  ;)

no smart ass i have just checked my profile and it's 4:35 which is the right thing.. may be there is a problem with the system of GB.. ask thhe mods if you dont believe me..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:39:09 AM
also i posted a lot of pics that shows i live in egypt!!.. i am sure you saw them not because you love me (i am not dorian ;D) but because you live here and check nearly everything..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 06:42:18 AM
no smart ass i have just checked my profile and it's 4:35 which is the right thing.. may be there is a problem with the system of GB.. ask thhe mods if you dont believe me..
Gender:     Male
Age:    N/A
Location:    Egypt
Local Time:    August 09, 2009, 06:41:24 AM
Language:    
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:46:22 AM
Gender:     Male
Age:    N/A
Location:    Egypt
Local Time:    August 09, 2009, 06:41:24 AM
Language:    

this is what appears to me:

Gender:  Male
Age: N/A
Location: Egypt
Local Time: August 09, 2009, 06:44:27 AM
Language:

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 06:48:23 AM
this is what appears to me:

Gender:  Male
Age: N/A
Location: Egypt
Local Time: August 09, 2009, 06:44:27 AM
Language:



local time in egypt  ;)

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=53
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:49:57 AM
but ironically this appears too:

Name:  Sherief Shalaby
Posts:  2539 (7.512 per day)
Position:  Getbig IV
Date Registered:  September 04, 2008, 09:44:15 PM
Last Active:  Today at 06:48:04 AM

this date contradicts the local time mentioned at the bottom of my profile..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:52:17 AM
local time in egypt  ;)

http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=53

did i mention something else!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 06:53:25 AM
Name:  NarcissisticDeity
Posts:  27970 (13.888 per day)
Position:  Getbig V
Date Registered:  February 02, 2004, 12:29:09 PM
Last Active:  Today at 06:52:11 AM

this is what appears to me in your profile.. is this time right in your place now?
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 06:55:22 AM
but ironically this appears too:

Name:  Sherief Shalaby
Posts:  2539 (7.512 per day)
Position:  Getbig IV
Date Registered:  September 04, 2008, 09:44:15 PM
Last Active:  Today at 06:48:04 AM

this date contradicts the local time mentioned at the bottom of my profile..


thats the last time you posted . your local time does NOT match the time in Egypt , that means you're not in Egypt  ;D your local time is the exact same time as BigBobs  ;) in Canada
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 07:02:47 AM
thats the last time you posted . your local time does NOT match the time in Egypt , that means you're not in Egypt  ;D your local time is the exact same time as BigBobs  ;) in Canada

so if bob and i are the same guy.. is it the one who posted his pics with nasser or the other one how has a great lean symmetrical body??? ;D

man i am in egypt, may be there is a problem with GB timing system with the arab countries.. may be it has been affected by the hatred most of the guys here show towrds me ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: The Wizard of Truth on August 09, 2009, 07:13:36 AM
According to this posting time its 7am or so,yet in reality here in Ireland its 3:15pm
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 07:14:00 AM
so if bob and i are the same guy.. is it the one who posted his pics with nasser or the other one how has a great lean symmetrical body??? ;D

man i am in egypt, may be there is a problem with GB timing system with the arab countries.. may be it has been affected by the hatred most of the guys here show towrds me ::)

You may not be Bob but you're a gimmick that's obvious regardless of where you are
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 07:19:39 AM
You may not be Bob but you're a gimmick that's obvious regardless of where you are

 ::) of if you think so..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 07:23:39 AM
::) of if you think so..


Back to Nasser getting destroyed by Dorian no pun intended  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 07:30:39 AM
man i am telling you the truth.. i live in japan and here is me with my brother.. you are so smart to expose me  :(
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: ChristopherA on August 09, 2009, 07:37:47 AM
Brutal arm crossing
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 07:40:06 AM
Back to Nasser getting destroyed by Dorian no pun intended  ;D

after seeing the video there is no point to keep posting your endless pictures..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 07:41:49 AM
after seeing the video there is no point to keep posting your endless pictures..

I'm glad you concede Dorian was superior  ;D that was easy wasn't it?
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 07:49:03 AM
I'm glad you concede Dorian was superior  ;D that was easy wasn't it?

before watching the video i was sure nasser was better now i am nothing but surer!!..

frankly speacking i dont like dorian's overall package in this year.. check again his side chest pose in the prejudging!!.. the size of his arm and shoulder are the same as shawn ray!!.. nasser's shoulders look twice the size of dorian's!!.. his left arm was even weaker than in 95 because overall he was not as full as in 95..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: BigBrianB on August 09, 2009, 07:52:26 AM
before watching the video i was sure nasser was better not i am nothing but surer!!..

frankly speacking i dont like dorian's overall package in this year.. check again his side chest pose in the prejudging!!.. the size of his arm and shoulder are the same as shawn ray!!.. nasser's shoulders look twice the size of dorian's!!.. his left arm was even weaker than in 95 because overall he was not as full as in 95..

To bad NASSER could never win. Dorian won 6 times. You are all talk and a cry baby.  ;)  You have been posting non stop for a week, you are obsessed monkey boy.  Narcissistic Deity OWNING Sherif AGAIN. :D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 07:55:59 AM
To bad NASSER could never win. Dorian won 6 times. You are all talk and a cry baby.  ;)  You have been posting non stop for a week, you are obsessed monkey boy.  Narcissistic Deity OWNING Sherif AGAIN. :D


have you taken the permission from your parents before posting my pic. with them :P
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 07:59:44 AM
before watching the video i was sure nasser was better now i am nothing but surer!!..

frankly speacking i dont like dorian's overall package in this year.. check again his side chest pose in the prejudging!!.. the size of his arm and shoulder are the same as shawn ray!!.. nasser's shoulders look twice the size of dorian's!!.. his left arm was even weaker than in 95 because overall he was not as full as in 95..

and as usual you're in direct opposition of what the judges think , which means you're willing to overlook his obvious flaws and the judges weren't Nasser Mr Olympia FROM THE FRONT  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 08:10:18 AM
and as usual you're in direct opposition of what the judges think , which means you're willing to overlook his obvious flaws and the judges weren't Nasser Mr Olympia FROM THE FRONT  ;)

man i am not telling you my opinion to convince you because i am sure you will never be convinced.. you are a hopeless case (may be the same as hulsher and also me) ;D.. to change your opinion you need to forget your memory and start dealing with things for the first time again..

yes nasser was the by far best from the front and i agree that dorian was the by far best from the rear (only because of his back).. still nasser's hams, arms/shoulders looked better from the rear so nasser was comparable from the back.. from the front dorian looked small, weak, and flat beside nasser.. to say the old shit that dorian was thicker from the side is just an excuse to add more points to dorian.. of course he was not thicker than nasser from the side specially on that particular day.. check the prejudging again!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:17:11 AM
man i am not telling you my opinion to convince you because i am sure you will never be convinced.. you are a hopeless case (may be the same as hulsher and also me) ;D.. to change your opinion you need to forget your memory and start dealing with things for the first time again..

yes nasser was the by far best from the front and i agree that dorian was the by far best from the rear (only because of his back).. still nasser's hams, arms/shoulders looked better from the rear so nasser was comparable from the back.. from the front dorian looked small, weak, and flat beside nasser.. to say the old shit that dorian was thicker from the side is just an excuse to add more points to dorian.. of course he was not thicker than nasser from the side specially on that particular day.. check the prejudging again!!..


Dorian won 1996 by a long margin , Nasser was a distant 3rd until he failed the drug test now he never placed  ;)

\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 08:19:44 AM
Quote
frankly speacking i dont like dorian's overall package in this year.. check again his side chest pose in the prejudging!!.. the size of his arm and shoulder are the same as shawn ray!!..

yeah, dorian had serious proportion issues that the nuthuggers always pretend didn't exist.. ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 08:20:50 AM
Dorian won 1996 by a long margin , Nasser was a distant 3rd until he failed the drug test now he never placed  ;)

\

so in your opinion shawn too deserved to beat nasser!!.. although you said before that nasser was better than dorian in 1997 and so better than shawn.. nasser 96 was better than nasser 97 while shawn 96 was nearly the same as in 97 so you again are contradicting yourself :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 08:21:18 AM
Dorian won 1996 by a long margin , Nasser was a distant 3rd until he failed the drug test now he never placed  ;)

\
LOL. Fail a drug test!? That doesn't sound very Wizard-of-Truthy.    :D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:22:16 AM
yeah, dorian had serious proportion issues that the nuthuggers always pretend didn't exist.. ::)

coming from a Coleman fan that's funny  ;D at his best his proportions were in another league from Ronnie , that year he wasn't at his best but still leaps & bounds better than everyone
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: PJim on August 09, 2009, 08:23:01 AM
Dorian easily wins. Easily. Look at him standing next to Shawn at the end, literally makes him look like a kid.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 08:23:23 AM
LOL. Fail a drug test!? That doesn't sound very Wizard-of-Truthy.    :D

jay cutler failed the same test in 2001 and his 2nd place is still valid.. ok if this is not due to policy so it's due to what??..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:24:45 AM
Dorian easily wins. Easily. Look at him standing next to Shawn at the end, literally makes him look like a kid.
;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 08:25:30 AM
Dorian easily wins. Easily. Look at him standing next to Shawn at the end, literally makes him look like a kid.

yes the same way nasser made dorian look like his son and shawn his grandson before he left ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: dr.chimps on August 09, 2009, 08:26:31 AM
jay cutler failed the same test in 2001 and his 2nd place is still valid.. ok if this is not due to policy so it's due to what??..
If I remember correctly (!?) didn't Jay lawyer up real fast on that one? Maybe, Nasser had no representation?  
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:26:56 AM
jay cutler failed the same test in 2001 and his 2nd place is still valid.. ok if this is not due to policy so it's due to what??..

because he was white  ::) no because the test wasn't done in an IOC approved lab and fought it won , Nasser knew he was on them and still lost what does that tell you? he takes them and was still soft as a babies ass from the back
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 08:27:48 AM
;D

dorian's quads were at their worse at this contest.. even in 94 they were sharper.. here they looked smooth and considerably small.. check nasser's quads!!.. a way bigger and sharper then dorian's..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: PJim on August 09, 2009, 08:28:54 AM
...Look at Dorian's waist here aswell, great taper.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr Nobody on August 09, 2009, 08:30:04 AM
...
Brutal ownage of Shawn in this one.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 08:34:34 AM
because he was white  ::) no because the test wasn't done in an IOC approved lab and fought it won , Nasser knew he was on them and still lost what does that tell you? he takes them and was still soft as a babies ass from the back

you cant mention any weak point on nasser on that day except his undetailed back (in comparison to dorian and shawn) but when you take an "honest" look at dorian's physique (sure this will never happen) you will realize that his shoulder was small, his left arm killed his symmetry, and, his quads were smooth, his chest was flat..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:38:44 AM
dorian's quads were at their worse at this contest.. even in 94 they were sharper.. here they looked smooth and considerably small.. check nasser's quads!!.. a way bigger and sharper then dorian's..

They mentioned they were a bit flat in the magazines not as sharp? no flat sure
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 08:45:05 AM
They mentioned they were a bit flat in the magazines not as sharp? no flat sure

in the 3rd pic. dorian's left arm looks too small and takes a lot from the overall of this pose.. dorian's torn biceps affected many poses and not only the FDB as you and some others always claim..

i am leaving now.. will pass by niagra fall on my way to home.. as you smartly exposed me i live in canada :-X
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:46:11 AM
you cant mention any weak point on nasser on that day except his undetailed back (in comparison to dorian and shawn) but when you take an "honest" look at dorian's physique (sure this will never happen) you will realize that his shoulder was small, his left arm killed his symmetry, and, his quads were smooth, his chest was flat..

undetailed back? his back has no depth , no density and no separtion it's not just detail , he looks like Mr Olympia from the front , he looks just good from the sides and from the back he looks like he State level competitor , small shoulders?  ::) symmetry? how about Nasser's short legs , long torso? how about his severely lacking forearms in relation to his biceps/triceps? you can knitpick flaws they all have them but in the end Nasser was one dimensional
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 08:47:08 AM
Quote
dorian's torn biceps affected many poses and not only the FDB as you and some others always claim..

yup. delusion is the game they play.

dorian was never the same from 94 onward. no matter what the nuthuggers might say.

he was great in 92 and 93. but his overall look suffered greatly the moment he tore that arm.. :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:47:57 AM
in the 3rd pic. dorian's left arm looks too small and takes a lot from the overall of this pose.. dorian's torn biceps affected many poses and not only the FDB as you and some others always claim..

i am leaving now.. will pass by niagra fall on my way to home.. as you smartly exposed me i live in canada :-X

countdown until BigBobs shows up  ;D

again you feel his biceps hurts his poses the judges didn't they beat you  ;) Dorian > Nasser
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 08:50:45 AM
countdown until BigBobs shows up  ;D

again you feel his biceps hurts his poses the judges didn't they beat you  ;) Dorian > Nasser

no i will rest my bobs account today.. may appear again as fatpanda or sharma, will eat something then decide.. as you know i live here.. bye bye..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:51:39 AM
yup. delusion is the game they play.

dorian was never the same from 94 onward. no matter what the nuthuggers might say.

he was great in 92 and 93. but his overall look suffered greatly the moment he tore that arm.. :-\

yeah which is why 95 is considered his best as usual Hulkster the moron contradicting the experts  ;D  ;)

reality owns you like it did Ronnie as Nasser  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 08:53:52 AM
no i will rest my bobs account today.. may appear again as fatpanda or sharma, will eat something then decide.. as you know i live here.. bye bye..

 ;D and when you come back Dorian will still own Nasser  ;) but don't fret he still owns Ronnie too  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 09:18:53 AM
Quote
again you feel his biceps hurts his poses the judges didn't

and you think this is a good thing?

how can you condone judging that was that poor?

it greatly hurt his look in many poses..although he was lucky that the mm was not a mandatory pose back then..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Daddison on August 09, 2009, 09:43:35 AM
This was the first contest I ever attended in person, and I drove up to Chicago with my Dad, who had been a big BB fan in the 70s.   He was really impressed with Nasser, and I had Dorian all the way.  I have to say, though, that Shawn looked just incredible and had a "pop" and separation that neither of the big guys could approach that day.  In the end, I still thought Dorian should win, but the strange thing was how Shawn could end up in second.   In my eyes, he should have been either the winner, or he should have landed in third.  He presented a completely different type of physique than Nasser or Dorian.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 10:11:02 AM
yes, Shawn was fantastic in the mid 90's, his physical stature and lat width is what hurt him.

still, he should have beaten the one armed bandit on at least one, and many would say two, occasions..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 09, 2009, 11:20:36 AM
ORLY!? Well, you fit every parameter for a gimmick account. Who's fault is that?   ;)

LMFAO which "parameters" are you referring to?  The fact that he posts with his real name?  The fact that he has a facebook account with his real name as well?  The fact that he has posted tons and tons of pics of himself from different timeframes?  The fact that his typing style is of a foreigner?  The fact that many friends on his facebook page speak back and fourth with him in Arabic?

As soon as I start thinking that Dr. Chimps and ND are from among the more intelligent posters here I get let down  :'(
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 11:23:49 AM
This was the first contest I ever attended in person, and I drove up to Chicago with my Dad, who had been a big BB fan in the 70s.   He was really impressed with Nasser, and I had Dorian all the way.  I have to say, though, that Shawn looked just incredible and had a "pop" and separation that neither of the big guys could approach that day.  In the end, I still thought Dorian should win, but the strange thing was how Shawn could end up in second.   In my eyes, he should have been either the winner, or he should have landed in third.  He presented a completely different type of physique than Nasser or Dorian.


yes i can recognaize your dad's voice when nasser was announced 3rd ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 11:26:54 AM
LMFAO which "parameters" are you referring to?  The fact that he posts with his real name?  The fact that he has a facebook account with his real name as well?  The fact that he has posted tons and tons of pics of himself from different timeframes?  The fact that his typing style is of a foreigner?  The fact that many friends on his facebook page speak back and fourth with him in Arabic?

As soon as I start thinking that Dr. Chimps and ND are from among the more intelligent posters here I get let down  :'(

lol brother.. may be they are intelligent but you and i are more intelligent to use for each account we have a tons of diff. pics and a totally separate style ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 09, 2009, 11:33:42 AM
lol brother.. may be they are intelligent but you and i are more intelligent to use for each account we have a tons of diff. pics and a totally separate style ;D

forgot to mention, another "parameter" is the fact that "Sherief Shalaby" would post yeears ago on Matt C's site too.

It all adds up.  I decided years ago to start posting favourably about Nasser, so I started by making a Sherief Shalaby account on Matt C's website, gathered many, many pictures of a random Arab in Egypt, started posting on getbig as bigbobs, made a facebook account for SS with a few hundred pictures of the anonymous Arab, about a year later registered the SS account on getbig, learned to speak Arabic so I could talk back and fourth in Arabic with Alnassak, KSA_Triceps, etc., mastered two different typing styles, etc.   ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 11:40:15 AM
forgot to mention, another "parameter" is the fact that "Sherief Shalaby" would post yeears ago on Matt C's site too.

It all adds up.  I decided years ago to start posting favourably about Nasser, so I started by making a Sherief Shalaby account on Matt C's website, gathered many, many pictures of a random Arab in Egypt, started posting on getbig as bigbobs, made a facebook account for SS with a few hundred pictures of the anonymous Arab, about a year later registered the SS account on getbig, learned to speak Arabic so I could talk back and fourth in Arabic with Alnassak, KSA_Triceps, etc., mastered two different typing styles, etc.   ;D

even the mosad wouldn't have arranged it in this accurate way as we/I have done ;)..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 11:41:35 AM
and you think this is a good thing?

how can you condone judging that was that poor?

it greatly hurt his look in many poses..although he was lucky that the mm was not a mandatory pose back then..


sure it did  ::) but Ronnies ' more detailed ' calves never hurt any of his poses , epic hypocrisy I get it judges are wrong when it Yates and right when its Ronnie lol

torn bicep can be hidden , pathetic Ms Olympia calves can't

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 01:17:27 PM
well, if you look at the poses I posted of dorian, your a complete idiot if you think is hiding his torn bi in any of those poses..

 ::)

then again, you do have your delusional rep to uphold..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 09, 2009, 01:18:57 PM
well, if you look at the poses I posted of dorian, your a complete idiot if you think is hiding his torn bi in any of those poses..

 ::)

then again, you do have your delusional rep to uphold..

In the end, Dorian won and to this day has the Sandow from that contest.  Decry the result all you want, but it changes nothing.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 02:55:58 PM
well, if you look at the poses I posted of dorian, your a complete idiot if you think is hiding his torn bi in any of those poses..

 ::)

then again, you do have your delusional rep to uphold..

stfu jackass you're the dummy who claims Dorian lost the 93 O and Ronnies calves are more detailed  ::) and again Ronnie's TWO complete missing calves are okay but Dorians torn bicep isn't  ::)

we can always count on you for meltdowns when new Yates footage comes out crushing everything you were typed , the best is when you actually had the balls to type ' not to bash Dorian ' lmmfao tool

Dorian kicked Ronnie's and Nassers ass for years get over it
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 03:19:00 PM

Quote
Dorian kicked Ronnie's and Nassers ass for years get over it

LOL ND is melting down simply because every time new dorian footage comes out it still never comes close to a late 90's coleman and he knows it:

ahead of nasser, sure. but not ronnie.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 03:44:02 PM
LOL ND is melting down simply because every time new dorian footage comes out it still never comes close to a late 90's coleman and he knows it:

ahead of nasser, sure. but not ronnie.

Wow see back fire once again , you have a really bad habit of proven yourself wrong , Dorian NOT at his best and the difference between density and dryness is staggering no wonder why McGough said Ronnie was never harder or drier  :o  :o look at Ronnie's soft bloated gut  :-\

lmfao at your backfire  ;D  ;)

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 05:39:51 PM
LOL here is a hint: ronnie coleman's alien abs are not a good indicator of his dryness, density or muscle quality. but the rest of him is: :P
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 05:42:10 PM
Quote
no wonder why McGough said Ronnie was never harder or drier

or, perhaps he was an idiot for making such a stupid easily refutable comment?

what would peter say about his best friend given what real life has to say?:

would he still maintain his position?

I highly doubt it:
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:45:10 PM
LOL here is a hint: ronnie coleman's alien abs are not a good indicator of his dryness, density or muscle quality. but the rest of him is: :P

continue your meltdown , in yet another Yates thread trying to prove the experts wrong  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 05:47:04 PM
LOL do you sit on your computer all day and wait for me to post?

its amazing, I can not post for hours, I come on and post, and flower boy posts 3 seconds later.. ???

sad sad sad.

you follow me around like my shadow.. :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:47:33 PM
or, perhaps he was an idiot for making such a stupid easily refutable comment?

what would peter say about his best friend given what real life has to say?:

would he still maintain his position?

I highly doubt it:

Wow great comparison because you're getting crushed with Yates 96 pics that caused another meltdown  ;)

NO an idiot would claim an eyewitness who knows what he's taken about and who was actually live and in person is wrong and he was right despite never seeing ANY contest

I know an idiot like that  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 05:50:32 PM
LOL so now eyewitnesses can say whatever they want despite real life showing the opposite in every single instance and it must automatically be true no matter what LOL

 ::)

especially eyewitnesses that are good friends with Yates and fellow countrymen..

LOL even more

 ::)

flowerboy's delusion is incredibly amusing.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:51:54 PM
LOL do you sit on your computer all day and wait for me to post?

its amazing, I can not post for hours, I come on and post, and flower boy posts 3 seconds later.. ???

sad sad sad.

you follow me around like my shadow.. :-\

make up your mind moron am I running from you or an I following you?  ;)

I was here FIRST you FOLLOWED ME and Yates into yet another thread , got embarrassed and reduced to posting biceps shots  ::)

typical Hulkster nothing new , I don't run from YOU or follow YOU that's your M.O.

Hulkster in yet another Yates thread crying about how the experts are wrong posting Ronnie pics , yawn  ::) 


continue with your meltdown  ;) it happens whenever good quality video or pics come of Yates
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:54:22 PM
LOL so now eyewitnesses can say whatever they want despite real life showing the opposite in every single instance and it must automatically be true no matter what LOL

 ::)

especially eyewitnesses that are good friends with Yates and fellow countrymen..

LOL even more

 ::)

flowerboy's delusion is incredibly amusing.

You knew the diversionary personal attack was coming , sign of desperation & frustration

Many people claim Dorian is better conditioned NOT only McGough you have your excuses keep trying though and he said the best physique he seen onstage was Ronnie Coleman and the best off was you guessed it  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 09, 2009, 05:56:49 PM
it really is amazing how ANY thread can just eventually devolve into a ND vs. Hulkster exchange..............wh at would you guys do without one another??
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 09, 2009, 05:58:53 PM
it really is amazing how ANY thread can just eventually devolve into a ND vs. Hulkster exchange..............wh at would you guys do without one another??

I was doing fne until he spammed the board yet again , unlike that moron I don't just post on this topic it's his whole life chasing me around , I post in many , many different topics I'm a fan of the ' sport ' he's a fan of Ronnie's balls

he was defeated by me which is exactly why he follows me around like a lost puppy
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 09, 2009, 06:10:00 PM
LOL so now eyewitnesses can say whatever they want despite real life showing the opposite in every single instance and it must automatically be true no matter what LOL

 ::)

especially eyewitnesses that are good friends with Yates and fellow countrymen..


Here we go again with the politics card. lol
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 09, 2009, 06:11:13 PM
I was doing fne until he spammed the board yet again , unlike that moron I don't just post on this topic it's his whole life chasing me around , I post in many , many different topics I'm a fan of the ' sport ' he's a fan of Ronnie's balls

he was defeated by me which is exactly why he follows me around like a lost puppy

.......LOL.......  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: the_swami on August 09, 2009, 09:25:14 PM
Back to Nasser getting destroyed by Dorian no pun intended  ;D

from those pics it looks like Nasser destroying DOrian.

if you add those front + side mandatories where Nasser is just killing Dorian

you have Nasser the clear and rightful winner

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 10:37:25 PM


as always the swami comes to say the truth.. he is another wizard of truth in life ;D

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 10:40:16 PM
ND in all fairness and aside of being a fan of dorian's balls ;D how do you see nasser "just good" from the side!!.. from the side you see traps, chest, abs, shoulders, triceps, biceps, quads, hams, and, calves.. nasser has all these mentioned parts thick, big, sharp, and, most important, good looking so how come to say he is flat from the side!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Parker on August 09, 2009, 11:05:17 PM


nasser's 3rd place was recieved by the biggest and the strongest boo in the history of the sport ;)
the whole contest is now available on youtube for those who are interested..

No, that would go to Paul Dillett winning the NOC over Ruhl...he said he was coming in to guest pose, and Shawn Ray who was watching even walked out the building.

At the 1996 Mr. O the most hurt was Flex, because he lost to Kevin in a tossup at the 1996 Arnold, and in this vid I believe he didn't even shake Kev's hand.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 09, 2009, 11:16:13 PM
No, that would go to Paul Dillett winning the NOC over Ruhl...he said he was coming in to guest pose, and Shawn Ray who was watching even walked out the building.

At the 1996 Mr. O the most hurt was Flex, because he lost to Kevin in a tossup at the 1996 Arnold, and in this vid I believe he didn't even shake Kev's hand.

although before his routine flex said his aim was to be 2nd but if he received any thing worse he wouldn't be upset because he had done his job lol..

yes there was a private war between flex and levrone in that year..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 09, 2009, 11:16:26 PM
Quote
make up your mind moron am I running from you or an I following you?  

both moron.

you ran from the truce thread but follow me everywhere else.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 12:38:33 AM
both moron.

you ran from the truce thread but follow me everywhere else.

Yeah yeah , sure sure  ::) I posted here first as usual Hulkster the troll followed ME into yet another thread about Yates

everyone knows I don't run from you or follow you that's YOUR m.o. it's all you know you ONLY post when you see ' Yates ' or ' NarcissisticDeity ' I embarrassed the living shit out of you , crushed you using your own hero and walked away mission accomplished

now poor little Hulkster in yet another Dorian Yates thread reduced to personal attacks and posting slanted pics of Ronnie curling  ::) crying how the experts are all wrong your shit is old kid nobody cares
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 12:54:14 AM
ND in all fairness and aside of being a fan of dorian's balls ;D how do you see nasser "just good" from the side!!.. from the side you see traps, chest, abs, shoulders, triceps, biceps, quads, hams, and, calves.. nasser has all these mentioned parts thick, big, sharp, and, most important, good looking so how come to say he is flat from the side!!..

Nasser can't even do the side poses correctly to begin with either of them and he's not the same imposing force from the sides as he is from dead on , which is exactly why he's a one dimensional bodybuilder

and nice move on your part removing the Shawn from the pic of the side chest , please note Shawn for a textbook side chest shot and look how Nasser can't even get that pose right , which is why in some side shots you'd never be able to tell Nasser outweighs a guy by 50 pounds ! just like when you posted the pics from 98 of the side shots it was insane that neither Flex or Ronnie weighed anywhere near Nasser but look almost as big from the sides

1995 perfect example Nasser is bigger yet you'd never know
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 01:02:38 AM
Nasser can't even do the side poses correctly to begin with either of them and he's not the same imposing force from the sides as he is from dead on , which is exactly why he's a one dimensional bodybuilder

and nice move on your part removing the Shawn from the pic of the side chest , please note Shawn for a textbook side chest shot and look how Nasser can't even get that pose right , which is why in some side shots you'd never be able to tell Nasser outweighs a guy by 50 pounds ! just like when you posted the pics from 98 of the side shots it was insane that neither Flex or Ronnie weighed anywhere near Nasser but look almost as big from the sides

1995 perfect example Nasser is bigger yet you'd never know

give me your dorian's love eye glasses to see things as you do!!.. of course nasser looks bigger than dorian in this particular 95 shot although he is farer to the camera..

as i told you before you will never be neutral until you get dorian's balls from your mind, or at least one ball of them to be semi neutral ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: webcake on August 10, 2009, 01:03:45 AM
Nasser certainly got screwed over that year. He should have been at least 2nd, if not 1st.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Parker on August 10, 2009, 01:06:00 AM
Nasser certainly got screwed over that year. He should have been at least 2nd, if not 1st.

With a back that wasn't as detailed, No...in fact Ronnie Coleman had a better package and back that year, but was overlooked.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 01:11:24 AM
Nasser certainly got screwed over that year. He should have been at least 2nd, if not 1st.

by the way you were one of those guys who were underrating nasser's level without knowing exactly how he looked like in his best years.. now as you have seen you are saying the truth!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: webcake on August 10, 2009, 01:13:50 AM
by the way you were one of those guys who were underrating nasser's level without knowing exactly how he looked like in his best years.. now as you have seen you are saying the truth!!..

I use to say shit ages ago about Nasser, but that was just more to do with Bobs constantly spamming the board with Nasser threads. I have, for a long time, always said that Nasser was an amazing bb'er and should have won the O in 96,97 and possibly even 1998.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 01:16:01 AM
With a back that wasn't as detailed, No...in fact Ronnie Coleman had a better package and back that year, but was overlooked.

ronnie was good that year but didnt deserve anything more than 5th.. he was still faraway from his best, this is beside his know weak points, calves, gyno .. etc..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 01:23:41 AM
I use to say shit ages ago about Nasser, but that was just more to do with Bobs constantly spamming the board with Nasser threads. I have, for a long time, always said that Nasser was an amazing bb'er and should have won the O in 96,97 and possibly even 1998.

but i remember well that when i made that thread comparing nasser at his best with wolf at his best you commented that you didnt know that nasser was that great in his best years.. note that i have an elephant memory just like the wizard of truth himself ;D

so you were saying shit to bob because he was posting a lot about nasser (who is his personal friend) but you dont say shit to ND or hulcher whom both ass lick ronnie and dorian all the time ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: webcake on August 10, 2009, 01:27:10 AM
but i remember well that when i made that thread comparing nasser at his best with wolf at his best you commented that you didnt know that nasser was that great in his best years.. note that i have an elephant memory just like the wizard of truth himself

so you were saying shit to bob because he was posting a lot about nasser (who is his personal friend) but you dont say shit ND or hulcher whom both ass lick ronnie and dorian all the time

This was quite a while ago, i don't think you were posting as much back then. Bobs was making multiple threads on the G&O about Nasser everyday. Even Ron told him to stop.

As for ND and Hulkster, i can't be bothered arguing with them. They have been arguing about their favourite muscle man in a thong for longer than i have been a member here.  ;D

I'm not sure of everything i said in the Nasser vs Wolf thread, but i remember saying Nasser had better structure than Wolf and would beat him.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Parker on August 10, 2009, 01:31:44 AM
I use to say shit ages ago about Nasser, but that was just more to do with Bobs constantly spamming the board with Nasser threads. I have, for a long time, always said that Nasser was an amazing bb'er and should have won the O in 96,97 and possibly even 1998.

Unfortunately it has only been since Jay won, did a modern Mr. O have a sub-standard back...Nasser's back was sub-standard in terms of depth and detail. Width he had in spades...There were just better bodies ahead of him...
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 01:32:44 AM
This was quite a while ago, i don't think you were posting as much back then. Bobs was making multiple threads on the G&O about Nasser everyday. Even Ron told him to stop.

As for ND and Hulkster, i can't be bothered arguing with them. They have been arguing about their favourite muscle man in a thong for longer than i have been a member here.  ;D

I'm not sure of everything i said in the Nasser vs Wolf thread, but i remember saying Nasser had better structure than Wolf and would beat him.

ok i forgive you ;D

anyway it's nice that you believe that nasser is 3 times uncrowned mr. olympia..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: webcake on August 10, 2009, 01:35:48 AM
ok i forgive you ;D

anyway it's nice that you believe that nasser is 3 times uncrowned mr. olympia..

I may give you some shit at times, but i stay neutral with any bb'er and judge them on their ohysique, not their race, religion, background or personality.

And i always noticed that Nasser was very respectful on stage and always shook everyones hand even after they announced he was robbed.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 01:39:36 AM
Unfortunately it has only been since Jay won, did a modern Mr. O have a sub-standard back...Nasser's back was sub-standard in terms of depth and detail. Width he had in spades...There were just better bodies ahead of him...

yes nasser's back lacked a lot the same way dorian shoulders and arms lacked!!.. so why should we consider the back muscle more important??.. back as a whole is a big body part but still it's not everything.. as you see in this 96 video nasser's quads, hams, chest, abs, arms were all better and bigger than dorian's while dorian only had a better back!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 01:42:35 AM
I may give you some shit at times, but i stay neutral with any bb'er and judge them on their ohysique, not their race, religion, background or personality.

And i always noticed that Nasser was very respectful on stage and always shook everyones hand even after they announced he was robbed.

man i said i forgave you but stop it.. dont try, whatever you say now wont let me accept you as a member in team nasser ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: webcake on August 10, 2009, 01:43:49 AM
man i said i forgave you but stop it.. dont try, whatever you say now wont let me accept you as a member in team nasser ;D

Damn it....... ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 02:27:18 AM
dorian was not smart to do the MM beside nasser ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Parker on August 10, 2009, 03:13:32 AM
yes nasser's back lacked a lot the same way dorian shoulders and arms lacked!!.. so why should we consider the back muscle more important??.. back as a whole is a big body part but still it's not everything.. as you see in this 96 video nasser's quads, hams, chest, abs, arms were all better and bigger than dorian's while dorian only had a better back!!..

The back is a big bodypart, and you can't unseat a reigning Mr. O without one...even Ronnie, who beat himself, allowed his back to decline, where Jay had improved his own (but wasn't enought o beat a prime Ronnie back)...that is the fact. You HAVE to have BACK DETAIL, THICKNESS, and WIDTH in order to be Mr. O, Flex and Phil are basically the only two that could get by with not having a wider back, but have the rest.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 07:48:37 AM
give me your dorian's love eye glasses to see things as you do!!.. of course nasser looks bigger than dorian in this particular 95 shot although he is farer to the camera..

as i told you before you will never be neutral until you get dorian's balls from your mind, or at least one ball of them to be semi neutral ;D

Is that the best you can manage? personal attacks are the hallmark of a defeated individual , you can't even begin to tocuh the fact I pointed out that he can't even do the poses correctly nevermind he doesn't look like he outweights Dorian by 20+ pounds

You're treading in Hulkster territory with your desperation you're in good company  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 07:52:35 AM
I use to say shit ages ago about Nasser, but that was just more to do with Bobs constantly spamming the board with Nasser threads. I have, for a long time, always said that Nasser was an amazing bb'er and should have won the O in 96,97 and possibly even 1998.

Nasser was an amazing bodybuilder FROM THE FRONT good from the sides and pathetic from the back

Dorian easily trampled him in 96 you can give him 97 and Ronnie murdered him in 98
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 07:56:08 AM
Is that the best you can manage? personal attacks are the hallmark of a defeated individual , you can't even begin to tocuh the fact I pointed out that he can't even do the poses correctly nevermind he doesn't look like he outweights Dorian by 20+ pounds

You're treading in Hulkster territory with your desperation you're in good company  ;)

i never attack you "personaly".. dorian's ball and so are just jokes for fun..

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 08:06:29 AM
yes nasser's back lacked a lot the same way dorian shoulders and arms lacked!!.. so why should we consider the back muscle more important??.. back as a whole is a big body part but still it's not everything.. as you see in this 96 video nasser's quads, hams, chest, abs, arms were all better and bigger than dorian's while dorian only had a better back!!..

I don't get your delusion with Yates delts  ??? and arms? Dorian's biceps were never great worse when he tore one but his triceps ( parts of the arms  ;) ) and forearms are very good , ironically you overlook Nasser's pathetic forearms , like Hulkster you cherry pick while glossing over Nasser's flaws

Back is a huge and complex mucle group without one you're fucked , infranspinatus , teres major & minor , lats upper and lower , traps , spinal erectors these are all muscles and when you only have with and traps you're severly lacking

Another mistake you make like the Hulkster is you keep trying to rack up parts , it doesn't work that way it's poses who has the better pose that what counts , and I already said Nasser clearly has the better  front double bicep pose and maybe ( maybe key word ) the ab-thigh , all the other poses Nasser is soundly beaten

Another glarring flaw of Nasser was his conditioning , he was hard from the front and soft from the back sorta like Jay was , his back looked like someone erased it his glutes were never striated he could never get completely hard and dry , please learn how contests are judged before you comit to an opinion otherwise you run the risk of me correcting you which is becoming a habit lately  ;)


Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 08:07:41 AM
i never attack you "personaly".. dorian's ball and so are just jokes for fun..



sure you have you're getting upset and it shows because you can intelligently defend your position , like Hulkster you say ' see ' and that's it

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 10, 2009, 08:19:38 AM
I don't get your delusion with Yates delts  ??? and arms? Dorian's biceps were never great worse when he tore one but his triceps ( parts of the arms  ;) ) and forearms are very good , ironically you overlook Nasser's pathetic forearms , like Hulkster you cherry pick while glossing over Nasser's flaws

Back is a huge and complex mucle group without one you're fucked , infranspinatus , teres major & minor , lats upper and lower , traps , spinal erectors these are all muscles and when you only have with and traps you're severly lacking

Another mistake you make like the Hulkster is you keep trying to rack up parts , it doesn't work that way it's poses who has the better pose that what counts , and I already said Nasser clearly has the better  front double bicep pose and maybe ( maybe key word ) the ab-thigh , all the other poses Nasser is soundly beaten

Another glarring flaw of Nasser was his conditioning , he was hard from the front and soft from the back sorta like Jay was , his back looked like someone erased it his glutes were never striated he could never get completely hard and dry , please learn how contests are judged before you comit to an opinion otherwise you run the risk of me correcting you which is becoming a habit lately  ;)





very logical post.......completely accurate............end of argument.


sherif please go and asphyxiate on the shit-stained posing trunks you have over your face........ :P :P
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 08:26:03 AM
I don't get your delusion with Yates delts  ??? and arms? Dorian's biceps were never great worse when he tore one but his triceps ( parts of the arms  ;) ) and forearms are very good , ironically you overlook Nasser's pathetic forearms , like Hulkster you cherry pick while glossing over Nasser's flaws

Back is a huge and complex mucle group without one you're fucked , infranspinatus , teres major & minor , lats upper and lower , traps , spinal erectors these are all muscles and when you only have with and traps you're severly lacking

Another mistake you make like the Hulkster is you keep trying to rack up parts , it doesn't work that way it's poses who has the better pose that what counts , and I already said Nasser clearly has the better  front double bicep pose and maybe ( maybe key word ) the ab-thigh , all the other poses Nasser is soundly beaten

Another glarring flaw of Nasser was his conditioning , he was hard from the front and soft from the back sorta like Jay was , his back looked like someone erased it his glutes were never striated he could never get completely hard and dry , please learn how contests are judged before you comit to an opinion otherwise you run the risk of me correcting you which is becoming a habit lately  ;)




nasser's forearms were not weak,.. just check the below pic. from the same contest.. i agree with you that it's a poses sport and not just body parts but imo nasser was better than dorian in the side chest and the side triceps (i am talking now about mr. olympia 1996 and not in general).. when both are at their best, it is hard to say, dorian triceps itself was better but everything else on nasser was better.. abs and thigh pose must go to nasser because simply nasser's abs and nasser's tights were better!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: kyomu on August 10, 2009, 08:28:47 AM
I still vote for Nasser.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 09:20:17 AM
I still vote for Nasser.

you are a good guy and i am sure you can beat milos wife in squats ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Nizar on August 10, 2009, 09:26:13 AM
sure you have you're getting upset and it shows because you can intelligently defend your position , like Hulkster you say ' see ' and that's it



Its funny how this guy changes tactics and tries to claim it was a joke when the tables are turned on him.
How often has he repeated this tactic? However when someone else jokes about him he melts down faster than an ice cream cone in a desert.  :-\.

Once he takes nassers balls out of his mouth  ;D maybe he'll realize that nasser was always doomed to second / third place even in international competitions. Even when he won once in a blue moon he was never able to repeat the same  the following year. Even in his best years he was unable to win consistently like Dorian /Ronnie have.

I'm sure the whole planet was in on the conspiracy to keep nasser down. :)

Even after dorian retired nasser was unable to beat Big Ron Coleman. In fact Ronnie scared nasser so badly that nasser started dropping in his placings everytime he competed anywhere for years afterwards.
Total mental annhilation




Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 10:32:42 AM
nasser's forearms were not weak,.. just check the below pic. from the same contest.. i agree with you that it's a poses sport and not just body parts but imo nasser was better than dorian in the side chest and the side triceps (i am talking now about mr. olympia 1996 and not in general).. when both are at their best, it is hard to say, dorian triceps itself was better but everything else on nasser was better.. abs and thigh pose must go to nasser because simply nasser's abs and nasser's tights were better!!..

Nassers forearms SUCK they are developed yes they are lacking in shape , they are lacking in size and in proportion , you have to think like a judge not like a fan-boy  ;)

Side chest in 1996 Dorian is better same as the side triceps , ab-thigh I could see Nasser edging Dorian out in on this particular year but Dorian more than holds his own a close poses

what you must understand that all rounds are physique rounds and all of the criteria is assessed at once so like Coleman , Nasser meets part(s) of it better but Dorian meets all of it better that's how it works

forearms?  :-\

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Tombo on August 10, 2009, 10:41:37 AM
lol @ the shit the roll onto the stages these days goddamn those guys were fucking crazy looking
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 10, 2009, 11:18:27 AM
Nasser can't even do the side poses correctly to begin with either of them

What's the "correct" way of doing the side poses and how is Nasser's way "incorrect?"  Is there a manual that specifies what the "correct" way of doing it is? 

and nice move on your part removing the Shawn from the pic of the side chest , please note Shawn for a textbook side chest shot and look how Nasser can't even get that pose right , which is why in some side shots you'd never be able to tell Nasser outweighs a guy by 50 pounds !

You're right, in that side chest comparison Nasser does not look like he outweighs Shawn by 50 lbs, looks more like he outweighs him by 70 lbs!  :o

And Nasser often looked bigger than Dorian even when their bodyweight was comparable (ex. in 1997 O their bodyweight was the same but Nasser looked bigger onstage), so how then does Dorian's size compare to lighter bodybuilder's onstage?  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 10, 2009, 11:27:13 AM
The back is a big bodypart, and you can't unseat a reigning Mr. O without one...even Ronnie, who beat himself, allowed his back to decline, where Jay had improved his own (but wasn't enought o beat a prime Ronnie back)...that is the fact. You HAVE to have BACK DETAIL, THICKNESS, and WIDTH in order to be Mr. O, Flex and Phil are basically the only two that could get by with not having a wider back, but have the rest.

Unfortunately it has only been since Jay won, did a modern Mr. O have a sub-standard back...Nasser's back was sub-standard in terms of depth and detail. Width he had in spades...There were just better bodies ahead of him...

LOL so you're saying there is a certain critieria that no matter how much one bodybuilder excels over the other in all other bodyparts and areas, the back is magical in that lacking back detail relative to others will make you lose no matter what?  Then later when Jay's turn came that criteria was no longer valid?

And that the criteria doesn't apply to Flex or Phil?  Sounds like you're making up your own criteria as you go due to your love of Black bodybuilders
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 10, 2009, 11:33:15 AM
According to this posting time its 7am or so,yet in reality here in Ireland its 3:15pm

According to ND and Chimps this means you must be a gimmick!   ::)

forgot to mention, another "parameter" is the fact that "Sherief Shalaby" would post yeears ago on Matt C's site too.

It all adds up.  I decided years ago to start posting favourably about Nasser, so I started by making a Sherief Shalaby account on Matt C's website, gathered many, many pictures of a random Arab in Egypt, started posting on getbig as bigbobs, made a facebook account for SS with a few hundred pictures of the anonymous Arab, about a year later registered the SS account on getbig, learned to speak Arabic so I could talk back and fourth in Arabic with Alnassak, KSA_Triceps, etc., mastered two different typing styles, etc.   ;D

Still waiting for Chimps' take on the above since he's so convinced that I'm SS. :)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 01:09:00 PM
What's the "correct" way of doing the side poses and how is Nasser's way "incorrect?"  Is there a manual that specifies what the "correct" way of doing it is? 

You're right, in that side chest comparison Nasser does not look like he outweighs Shawn by 50 lbs, looks more like he outweighs him by 70 lbs!  :o

And Nasser often looked bigger than Dorian even when their bodyweight was comparable (ex. in 1997 O their bodyweight was the same but Nasser looked bigger onstage), so how then does Dorian's size compare to lighter bodybuilder's onstage?  ;)

Oh yes there is a right way to do a side chest pose and it is NOT like Nasser who does NOT pull his arm into the rib cage he puts it near the hip , he doesn't arch his rib cage or his lower back , he doesn't pull the arm all the way back he turns it into a front chest pose he to busy trying to show his abs , I think he would be more impressive if he did it the right way .

Nonsense Nasser looked bigger than Yates at the same weight , 1997 is a clear case of that even in 1996 when Yates was lighter he looks bigger , from the size Nasser's size is NOT apparent even next to Ray you like Hulkster see what you want , Nasser is NOT the imposing force from the sides as he is from the front

1996 ab-thigh Dorian is much lighter but you would never know it same with the ab-thigh of them at the same weight from 1997 Dorian looks bigger . same with the rear latspreads , etc , etc
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 01:21:12 PM
LOL so you're saying there is a certain critieria that no matter how much one bodybuilder excels over the other in all other bodyparts and areas, the back is magical in that lacking back detail relative to others will make you lose no matter what?  Then later when Jay's turn came that criteria was no longer valid?

And that the criteria doesn't apply to Flex or Phil?  Sounds like you're making up your own criteria as you go due to your love of Black bodybuilders

This is the IFBB criteria for the back double bicpes pose which they put a lot of emphasis on the back and this pose being the overall barometer of density , balance and definition one of his worse poses too

Back Double Biceps (see Figure 4)
Standing with his back to the judges, the competitor will
bend the arms and wrists as in the Front Double Biceps
pose, and will place one foot back, resting on the toes.
He will then contract the arm muscles as well as the
muscles of the shoulders, upper and lower back, thigh
and calf muscles.

The judge will first survey the arm muscles and then do
the head-to-foot survey, during which there are more
muscle groups to look at than in all of the other poses.
This includes the neck, deltoids, biceps, triceps, forearm,
trapezius, teres, infraspinatus, erector spinae, external
obliques, latissimus dorsi, gluteus, thigh biceps, and
calves. This pose, probably more than the others, will
help the judge to determine the quality of the
competitor’s muscle density, definition, and overall
balance.



This pose, probably more than the others, will
help the judge to determine the quality of the
competitor’s muscle density, definition, and overall
balance.


Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 10, 2009, 02:20:02 PM
Quote
Another mistake you make like the Hulkster is you keep trying to rack up parts , it doesn't work that way it's poses who has the better pose that what counts

why you keep saying I am focusing on the parts is anyone's guess.

I have always argued that Ronnie beats dorian because his mandatories are way better (and they are) and the same applies to the nasser shots from the front as well.

thats the problem with dorian: he was a good back and calves and little else. and it shows greatly when you compare him to a late 90's post Mr. O ronnie or even the front shots with nasser.

dorian was a mess.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 03:18:16 PM
why you keep saying I am focusing on the parts is anyone's guess.

I have always argued that Ronnie beats dorian because his mandatories are way better (and they are) and the same applies to the nasser shots from the front as well.

thats the problem with dorian: he was a good back and calves and little else. and it shows greatly when you compare him to a late 90's post Mr. O ronnie or even the front shots with nasser.

dorian was a mess.

All you do is post a pic say " Ronnie has better this that and this " that's where I get you always focusing on parts

And spoken like a true ignorant moron trying to reduce Yates to a back and calves , this statement alone shows your bias , ignorance and stupidity and as usual bodybuilding experts and history own the living shit out of you

Dorian beat Nasser & Ronnie because he had better muscular balance AND proportion AND better density AND dryness AND because he was more complete AND he was better at posing AND presentation

the more you try and downplay how great Yates was it only makes you look more pathetic , I know Ronnie Coleman was great I can admit that , I know Nasser was great ( from the front ) I can admit that and what makes Yates even better is that he did and could always beat them both  ;)  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 10, 2009, 03:30:04 PM
Oh yes there is a right way to do a side chest pose and it is NOT like Nasser who does NOT pull his arm into the rib cage he puts it near the hip , he doesn't arch his rib cage or his lower back , he doesn't pull the arm all the way back he turns it into a front chest pose he to busy trying to show his abs , I think he would be more impressive if he did it the right way .

And where is this criteria for a "correct" side chest pose coming from??  Yourself?  That's what I thought.   ::)


Nonsense Nasser looked bigger than Yates at the same weight , 1997 is a clear case of that even in 1996 when Yates was lighter he looks bigger , from the size Nasser's size is NOT apparent even next to Ray you like Hulkster see what you want , Nasser is NOT the imposing force from the sides as he is from the front

1996 ab-thigh Dorian is much lighter but you would never know it same with the ab-thigh of them at the same weight from 1997 Dorian looks bigger . same with the rear latspreads , etc , etc


In 1995 and 1996 Nasser was 5-10 lbs heavier than Yates - (270 in 95 and 275 in 96), and in 97 they were both 270 lbs.  The only pose where Yates looked bigger was the rear lat spread.  In 97 the difference was most obvious from the front and sides.  The only part of Dorian that looked bigger from the front and sides was his gut ;) 

Overall there was not much of a size difference (although Nasser was bigger overall), however since you keep saying "so and so weighed xx lbs less than Nasser but it doesnt look like it" it's fair to judge Dorian in  the same manner.

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 10, 2009, 03:32:15 PM
And where is this criteria for a "correct" side chest pose coming from??  Yourself?  That's what I thought.   ::)


In 1995 and 1996 Nasser was 5-10 lbs heavier than Yates - (270 in 95 and 275 in 96), and in 97 they were both 270 lbs.  The only pose where Yates looked bigger was the rear lat spread.  In 97 the difference was most obvious from the front and sides.  The only part of Dorian that looked bigger from the front and sides was his gut ;) 

Overall there was not much of a size difference (although Nasser was bigger overall), however since you keep saying "so and so weighed xx lbs less than Nasser but it doesnt look like it" it's fair to judge Dorian in  the same manner.




.........please choke on seman at some point tonight.........your just a boring little fag............can you not grasp what a fucking laughing stock you are on here??.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 03:44:23 PM
And where is this criteria for a "correct" side chest pose coming from??  Yourself?  That's what I thought.   ::)


In 1995 and 1996 Nasser was 5-10 lbs heavier than Yates - (270 in 95 and 275 in 96), and in 97 they were both 270 lbs.  The only pose where Yates looked bigger was the rear lat spread.  In 97 the difference was most obvious from the front and sides.  The only part of Dorian that looked bigger from the front and sides was his gut ;) 

Overall there was not much of a size difference (although Nasser was bigger overall), however since you keep saying "so and so weighed xx lbs less than Nasser but it doesnt look like it" it's fair to judge Dorian in  the same manner.



Quote
And where is this criteria for a "correct" side chest pose coming from??  Yourself?  That's what I thought. 

It's ALAWAYS been how a proper side chest is done , notice Nasser's doesn't look like that of Yates , Levrone , Ray? he's the odd man out and his side chest sucks you may like it but contests aren't judged on what you like ' That's what I thought ' I'm explaining to YOU how contests are judged and how poses are done not the other way around kid  ;)

Quote
n 1995 and 1996 Nasser was 5-10 lbs heavier than Yates - (270 in 95 and 275 in 96), and in 97 they were both 270 lbs.  The only pose where Yates looked bigger was the rear lat spread.  In 97 the difference was most obvious from the front and sides.  The only part of Dorian that looked bigger from the front and sides was his gut ;) 

Overall there was not much of a size difference (although Nasser was bigger overall), however since you keep saying "so and so weighed xx lbs less than Nasser but it doesnt look like it" it's fair to judge Dorian in  the same manner.

1995 Dorian was list as 255 pounds Nasser 270 virtually the same height , that's a 15 pound difference see what Yates looks like from 1992-1993 with an extra 15 pounds it's makes a big difference

Dorian 1996 was listed at 257 pounds although he looks smaller especially compared  to the same weight as 1993 , Nasser was 275 that's a even bigger difference 1996 Dorian looked just as big in the front latspread , ab-thigh and rear latspreads , even a bigger discrepancy in 1997 at the same weight

And that's all a matter of semantics and why? Nasser wasn't as dense as Dorian so the ' bigger ' size even entertaining it was true is redundant , he's soft as a babies ass from the back , pretty hard from the front , when will you learn bigger and softer doesn't trump smaller much harder , he was in THIRD in 1996 to a much smaller and better conditioned man , please learn how contests are judged

1997 BOTH 270 pounds and Nasser doesn't look nearly as heavy or as big as Yates
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 10, 2009, 03:54:28 PM
It's ALAWAYS been how a proper side chest is done ,

Like I thought, there is no actual source for what you consider to be the absolute "correct" and "incorrect" way of doing a side chest pose.

1997 BOTH 270 pounds and Nasser doesn't look nearly as heavy or as big as Yates

LOL @ choosing a pic where Yates looks much taller than Nasser even though they are the same height.  Why don't you comment on this picture from 97 that's scaled properly.  What part of Yates (other than his belly) is bigger than Nasser's?

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 10, 2009, 03:59:49 PM
Quote
Dorian beat Nasser & Ronnie because he had better muscular balance AND proportion AND better density AND dryness AND because he was more complete AND he was better at posing AND presentation

no, he beat nasser because nasser had no back.

and he beat ronnie because ronnie looked like crap back then and EVERYONE was beating him.

none of your bullshit that you typed as reasons applies to these two cases in any way shape or form.

 ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 10, 2009, 04:00:59 PM
Just watch parts 2 and 3 of the 96 Mr. O on YouTube and you'll see Dorian dominating Nasser.  It is a much better source than posting pics  They look the same in size, but Dorian is much, much drier.  
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 10, 2009, 04:04:04 PM
no, he beat nasser because nasser had no back.

Nasser more than made up for that one bodypart which Dorian beat him on by beating Dorian everywhere else.

Just watch parts 2 and 3 of the 96 Mr. O on YouTube and you'll see Dorian dominating Nasser.  It is a much better source than posting pics  They look the same in size, but Dorian is much, much drier. 

I watched the whole show and disagree - Nasser was clearly ahead of Dorian in 96
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 10, 2009, 04:06:30 PM
Nasser has a better front dbl bicep and equal, arguably better, overhead abs.  Dorian wins the rest of the poses.  Just my opinion though, as I admit Nasser was incredible and virtually unbeatable in these two poses.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: jaejonna on August 10, 2009, 04:21:03 PM
not this shit again
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 04:28:50 PM
Like I thought, there is no actual source for what you consider to be the absolute "correct" and "incorrect" way of doing a side chest pose.

LOL @ choosing a pic where Yates looks much taller than Nasser even though they are the same height.  Why don't you comment on this picture from 97 that's scaled properly.  What part of Yates (other than his belly) is bigger than Nasser's?



Quote
Like I thought, there is no actual source for what you consider to be the absolute "correct" and "incorrect" way of doing a side chest pose.

Again Nasser's pose doesn't look like anyone eleses ever wonder why? side chest has been done that way since the first Olympia from Scott to Arnold to Haney to Yates , Nasser doesn't do the pose correctly like Levrone with the legs spread apart rear latspread that's not how it's done

and here is the Official IFBB judging criteria for the pose , so NO not just like you thought , do some reading on the subject before you try and act knowledgeable

3. Side Chest (see Figure 3)
The competitor may choose either side for this pose, in
order to display the “better” arm. He will stand with his
left or right side towards the judges and will bend the arm
nearest the judges to a right-angle position, with the fist
clenched and, with the other hand, will grasp the wrist.
The leg nearest the judges will be bent at the knee and
will rest on the toes. The competitor will then expand the
chest and by upward pressure of the front bent arm and
contract the biceps as much as possible. He will also
contract the thigh muscles, in particular, the biceps
femoris group, and by downward pressure on his toes,
will display the contracted calf muscles.
The judge will pay particular attention to the pectoral
muscles and the arch of the rib cage, the biceps, the leg
biceps and the calves, and will conclude with the head-tofoot
examination. In this pose the judge will be able to
survey the thigh and calf muscles in profile, which will
help in grading their comparative development more
accurately.


Quote
LOL @ choosing a pic where Yates looks much taller than Nasser even though they are the same height.  Why don't you comment on this picture from 97 that's scaled properly.  What part of Yates (other than his belly) is bigger than Nasser's?

I posted a slew of pics NOT just that one and Nasser tends to crunch forward on the ab-thigh which would explain the height discrepancy and Dorian has hair  ;)



Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 04:30:04 PM
no, he beat nasser because nasser had no back.

and he beat ronnie because ronnie looked like crap back then and EVERYONE was beating him.

none of your bullshit that you typed as reasons applies to these two cases in any way shape or form.

 ::)

meltdown  ;)

yeah , yeah and Dorian was just a back and calves yet Ronnie to this day INSISTS he could never touch him  ;)

owned yet again
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 04:33:36 PM
Nasser more than made up for that one bodypart which Dorian beat him on by beating Dorian everywhere else.

I watched the whole show and disagree - Nasser was clearly ahead of Dorian in 96

hahahaha find solidarity with the other crybaby , Nasser was never good enough to beat Yates and neither was Ronnie , at least Ronnie stood a chance to beating Dorian at his best it was NEVER going to happen with Nasser

Quote
I watched the whole show and disagree - Nasser was clearly ahead of Dorian in 96

Which is exactly why he won , oppsssss NO racists judges held the " Arab " down  ::) you're just as pathetic as Hulkster when you have NO explanations cry politics

I'll give you 1997 which isn't saying much LMFAO he couldn't touch Yates at his best  ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 04:36:50 PM
Nasser has a better front dbl bicep and equal, arguably better, overhead abs.  Dorian wins the rest of the poses.  Just my opinion though, as I admit Nasser was incredible and virtually unbeatable in these two poses.

Exactly these were two very good poses for him , he looked awesome from the front ( sans front latspread another pose he can't do as well as Yates that is ) his conditioning was awesome FROM THE FRONT from the back he was Sponge BigBobs Soiled Pants

he was just limited to touch Dorian at his best
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 04:44:49 PM
Yates dominated 1996 and beat BOTH your heros in the process

poor Nasser why would you pull your arms back to draw attention to the worse part of your body? maybe he felt left out


Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 10, 2009, 06:25:25 PM
whats really telling is that even back in 1996, when ronnie didn't look so hot and was still getting beaten by everyone, his back was still wider than dorian's in 96...

by 98/9 and onward he was so far ahead that dorian, well, he was negated to a distant second place in the ranking of bb's greatest back..

you won't see ND plastering this screenshot in every post LOL

I wonder why? ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 10, 2009, 06:42:51 PM
whats really telling is that even back in 1996, when ronnie didn't look so hot and was still getting beaten by everyone, his back was still wider than dorian's in 96...

by 98/9 and onward he was so far ahead that dorian, well, he was negated to a distant second place in the ranking of bb's greatest back..

you won't see ND plastering this screenshot in every post LOL

I wonder why? ::)

Oh boy  ::) because Ronnie is not closer to the camera and the smaller waist & hips help with the ILLUSION Of superior width , which proves pics can be misleading and that pic is NOTHING new

Dorian's back RAPES Ronnies 96 or 99 0r 2003 it doesn't matter

and YOU never answered the question what makes Flex's poll better than this one? and Flex said Yates had the best back of the 20th century INCLUDED 1998 and 1999 owned again  ;)

Ronnie's back is lacking AT HIS BEST compared to Dorian not the other way around

http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.php?t=2974091
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: the_swami on August 10, 2009, 06:53:06 PM
i think Dorian raped Narcotic Dicky............which explains why he is so in love with Dorian.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 08:44:45 PM
back to my sherief shalaby account again  ::)

not like ND who always posts pics of certain poses or fron certain angles to show dorian's superiority, here i am posting all the available shots from the video of this contest to make a fair nasser/dorian comparison..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 08:46:35 PM
..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 08:48:31 PM
..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 08:51:09 PM
..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 09:02:19 PM
i am sure it's crystal clear from these pics that nasser was clearly bigger than dorian from the front and the size.. ND you wont be convinced i am sure but plz chec the side poses again and see how nasser's quads, arms, shoulders, chest all look like next to dorian's!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Parker on August 10, 2009, 09:02:58 PM
LOL so you're saying there is a certain critieria that no matter how much one bodybuilder excels over the other in all other bodyparts and areas, the back is magical in that lacking back detail relative to others will make you lose no matter what?  Then later when Jay's turn came that criteria was no longer valid?

And that the criteria doesn't apply to Flex or Phil?  Sounds like you're making up your own criteria as you go due to your love of Black bodybuilders

No, I used Flex and Phil as examples because they are considered heir apparents to the Mr. O titles during their respective eras and both are narrow, but have superior back detail. Flex more so than Phil. Being narrow is something you can't really change, back detail is something you can...Nasser never took the cahnce to etch in the detail, he was basically all mass, and thought he could get away with it...And as shown he was beten by a 224 pound Wheeler at the 1997 Arnold, whom Nasser said deserved the win, on record on video.

Now, Flex never could get his condition right for the Mr. O, and that is where Nasser soundly beat Flex,  at most of their meeting. And that is where NAsser ONLY excels over Flex...nothing more...
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 10, 2009, 09:07:32 PM
i am sure it's crystal clear from these pics that nasser was clearly bigger than dorian from the front and the size.. ND you wont be convinced i am sure but plz chec the side poses again and see how nasser's quads, arms, shoulders, chest all look like next to dorian's!!..

If I recall, Nasser got DQ'd from the contest, which means he cheated and still couldn't beat Yates. lol   Cheaters never prosper.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 10, 2009, 09:07:45 PM
i am sure it's crystal clear from these pics that nasser was clearly bigger than dorian from the front and the size.. ND you wont be convinced i am sure but plz chec the side poses again and see how nasser's quads, arms, shoulders, chest all look like next to dorian's!!..

the only thing that is crystal clear:

1)  you are a disgusting little homosexual

2)  everyone laughs at you, and you have no friends......save for the other members of team nasshole.....who too are laughed at by everyone else.

3)  you have NO fucking life, and way too much time on your hands

4)  your parents are ashamed of you
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 10, 2009, 09:11:47 PM
the only thing that is crystal clear:

1)  you are a disgusting little homosexual

2)  everyone laughs at you, and you have no friends......save for the other members of team nasshole.....who too are laughed at by everyone else.

3)  you have NO fucking life, and way too much time on your hands

4)  your parents are ashamed of you

look who is talking  ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: PJim on August 11, 2009, 06:07:54 AM
Some of you guys just don't understand the concept of meeting criteria. Dorian was the biggest taking conditioning into consideration, had the best overall package and presented it accordingly. I wouldn't even say I'd aspire to have a physique like Dorian's, I would prefer say Flex's, but I can see from a BODYBUILDING standpoint how Dorian won time and time again. Let's say Dorian lost 1 pose post-tear, front double biceps, (which in all reality displayed the immense thickness in his lats, forearms, shoulders and chest) he still wins all the mandatories. You couldnt even give Nasser the front relaxed because he was FAR from relaxed and don't get me started about his front lat-spread, to fully appreciate a lat spread the abs must be relaxed not contracted and hunched into! He WASN'T better from the side, side-tri, side-chest EASILY go to Dorian, just watch the video, don't rely on pictures, look at the thickness in Dorian's lower chest, look at the way he makes it a separate pose rather than merely a side most-muscular. The side-tri shows Dorian's thickness from head to toe, that pose more than any other in my opinion says it all. A lot of you guys complain that Dorian had small arms, but rate guys who had/have super heavyweight arms on a middleweight torso. Flex and Kevin for example, look at there side chest, great legs in Flex's case and great arms in Kev's, but where's the chest thickness? Hell, Nasser doesn't even pull his shoulder back far enough to appreciate it fully. I know a lot of you guys don't have a clue because you're the same guys who think that forearms and calves are unimportant. It comes down to something when the glutes are rated as more essential than calves.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Parker on August 11, 2009, 07:35:38 AM
Some of you guys just don't understand the concept of meeting criteria. Dorian was the biggest taking conditioning into consideration, had the best overall package and presented it accordingly. I wouldn't even say I'd aspire to have a physique like Dorian's, I would prefer say Flex's, but I can see from a BODYBUILDING standpoint how Dorian won time and time again. Let's say Dorian lost 1 pose post-tear, front double biceps, (which in all reality displayed the immense thickness in his lats, forearms, shoulders and chest) he still wins all the mandatories. You couldnt even give Nasser the front relaxed because he was FAR from relaxed and don't get me started about his front lat-spread, to fully appreciate a lat spread the abs must be relaxed not contracted and hunched into! He WASN'T better from the side, side-tri, side-chest EASILY go to Dorian, just watch the video, don't rely on pictures, look at the thickness in Dorian's lower chest, look at the way he makes it a separate pose rather than merely a side most-muscular. The side-tri shows Dorian's thickness from head to toe, that pose more than any other in my opinion says it all. A lot of you guys complain that Dorian had small arms, but rate guys who had/have super heavyweight arms on a middleweight torso. Flex and Kevin for example, look at there side chest, great legs in Flex's case and great arms in Kev's, but where's the chest thickness? Hell, Nasser doesn't even pull his shoulder back far enough to appreciate it fully. I know a lot of you guys don't have a clue because you're the same guys who think that forearms and calves are unimportant. It comes down to something when the glutes are rated as more essential than calves.

I agree, lol at the last senstence
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: knny187 on August 11, 2009, 08:38:54 AM
Seinfeld has a quote for everything.  "Your hung up on some clown from the 60's man"

best quote ever & it works here 100%
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 11, 2009, 09:35:32 AM
No, I used Flex and Phil as examples because they are considered heir apparents to the Mr. O titles during their respective eras and both are narrow, but have superior back detail. Flex more so than Phil. Being narrow is something you can't really change, back detail is something you can...Nasser never took the cahnce to etch in the detail, he was basically all mass, and thought he could get away with it...And as shown he was beten by a 224 pound Wheeler at the 1997 Arnold, whom Nasser said deserved the win, on record on video.

Now, Flex never could get his condition right for the Mr. O, and that is where Nasser soundly beat Flex,  at most of their meeting. And that is where NAsser ONLY excels over Flex...nothing more...

So flaws that are considered "changeable" are marked by judges as being more critical than those that are not so changeable and due to genetics, like width?  ???  Sorry man, you're making no sense.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 11, 2009, 09:42:53 AM
Some of you guys just don't understand the concept of meeting criteria. Dorian was the biggest taking conditioning into consideration, had the best overall package and presented it accordingly. I wouldn't even say I'd aspire to have a physique like Dorian's, I would prefer say Flex's, but I can see from a BODYBUILDING standpoint how Dorian won time and time again. Let's say Dorian lost 1 pose post-tear, front double biceps, (which in all reality displayed the immense thickness in his lats, forearms, shoulders and chest) he still wins all the mandatories. You couldnt even give Nasser the front relaxed because he was FAR from relaxed and don't get me started about his front lat-spread, to fully appreciate a lat spread the abs must be relaxed not contracted and hunched into! He WASN'T better from the side, side-tri, side-chest EASILY go to Dorian, just watch the video, don't rely on pictures, look at the thickness in Dorian's lower chest, look at the way he makes it a separate pose rather than merely a side most-muscular. The side-tri shows Dorian's thickness from head to toe, that pose more than any other in my opinion says it all. A lot of you guys complain that Dorian had small arms, but rate guys who had/have super heavyweight arms on a middleweight torso. Flex and Kevin for example, look at there side chest, great legs in Flex's case and great arms in Kev's, but where's the chest thickness? Hell, Nasser doesn't even pull his shoulder back far enough to appreciate it fully. I know a lot of you guys don't have a clue because you're the same guys who think that forearms and calves are unimportant. It comes down to something when the glutes are rated as more essential than calves.
Great post! End of debate.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 11, 2009, 09:50:40 AM
Some of you guys just don't understand the concept of meeting criteria. Dorian was the biggest taking conditioning into consideration, had the best overall package and presented it accordingly. I wouldn't even say I'd aspire to have a physique like Dorian's, I would prefer say Flex's, but I can see from a BODYBUILDING standpoint how Dorian won time and time again. Let's say Dorian lost 1 pose post-tear, front double biceps, (which in all reality displayed the immense thickness in his lats, forearms, shoulders and chest) he still wins all the mandatories. You couldnt even give Nasser the front relaxed because he was FAR from relaxed and don't get me started about his front lat-spread, to fully appreciate a lat spread the abs must be relaxed not contracted and hunched into! He WASN'T better from the side, side-tri, side-chest EASILY go to Dorian, just watch the video, don't rely on pictures, look at the thickness in Dorian's lower chest, look at the way he makes it a separate pose rather than merely a side most-muscular. The side-tri shows Dorian's thickness from head to toe, that pose more than any other in my opinion says it all. A lot of you guys complain that Dorian had small arms, but rate guys who had/have super heavyweight arms on a middleweight torso. Flex and Kevin for example, look at there side chest, great legs in Flex's case and great arms in Kev's, but where's the chest thickness? Hell, Nasser doesn't even pull his shoulder back far enough to appreciate it fully. I know a lot of you guys don't have a clue because you're the same guys who think that forearms and calves are unimportant. It comes down to something when the glutes are rated as more essential than calves.

LMFAO that the front double biceps was the the only mandatory shot that Nasser beat Dorian in - here are other mandatories in 97 where he beat Dorian in too - front relaxed, ab-thigh, side chest, side triceps, and even front lat spread! (front lat spread will go on a separate post since it only allows me to attach 4 shots here)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 11, 2009, 09:51:21 AM
 8)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 11, 2009, 12:36:30 PM
Some of you guys just don't understand the concept of meeting criteria. Dorian was the biggest taking conditioning into consideration, had the best overall package and presented it accordingly. I wouldn't even say I'd aspire to have a physique like Dorian's, I would prefer say Flex's, but I can see from a BODYBUILDING standpoint how Dorian won time and time again. Let's say Dorian lost 1 pose post-tear, front double biceps, (which in all reality displayed the immense thickness in his lats, forearms, shoulders and chest) he still wins all the mandatories. You couldnt even give Nasser the front relaxed because he was FAR from relaxed and don't get me started about his front lat-spread, to fully appreciate a lat spread the abs must be relaxed not contracted and hunched into! He WASN'T better from the side, side-tri, side-chest EASILY go to Dorian, just watch the video, don't rely on pictures, look at the thickness in Dorian's lower chest, look at the way he makes it a separate pose rather than merely a side most-muscular. The side-tri shows Dorian's thickness from head to toe, that pose more than any other in my opinion says it all. A lot of you guys complain that Dorian had small arms, but rate guys who had/have super heavyweight arms on a middleweight torso. Flex and Kevin for example, look at there side chest, great legs in Flex's case and great arms in Kev's, but where's the chest thickness? Hell, Nasser doesn't even pull his shoulder back far enough to appreciate it fully. I know a lot of you guys don't have a clue because you're the same guys who think that forearms and calves are unimportant. It comes down to something when the glutes are rated as more essential than calves.

exactly my points to the letter

I don't want to look like Yates never would but I fully understand why he dominated , I can separated what I like from what would win NONE of these guys can

they look at Dorian's physique can don't like they way it looks so therefore it shoudln't win couple that with bias and ignorance and you have a bunch of ignorant guys

and great comments about forearms & calves
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 11, 2009, 12:47:10 PM
LMFAO that the front double biceps was the the only mandatory shot that Nasser beat Dorian in - here are other mandatories in 97 where he beat Dorian in too - front relaxed, ab-thigh, side chest, side triceps, and even front lat spread! (front lat spread will go on a separate post since it only allows me to attach 4 shots here)


I'll work with you on the ab-thigh it could go either way and the front relaxed and front double biceps , Yates beat him in ALL of the other poses , see the side triceps for yet another pose Nasser can't seem to do



Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 11, 2009, 01:24:08 PM
Dorian more than holding his own in terms of size with Nasser and Dillet and absolutely killing them in conditioning & density.  Hail the King!
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 11, 2009, 01:36:53 PM
Dorian more than holding his own in terms of size with Nasser and Dillet and absolutely killing them in conditioning & density.  Hail the King!

In some shots I see Yates at 97 and say man maybe he should have lost but in others it's business as usual just beating everyone
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 11, 2009, 01:39:43 PM
back to my sherief shalaby account again  ::)

not like ND who always posts pics of certain poses or fron certain angles to show dorian's superiority, here i am posting all the available shots from the video of this contest to make a fair nasser/dorian comparison..

thanks for showing exactly why Dorian was the clear winner . forget screenshots watch the video of Dorian trampling Nasser and everyone else and the irony of you claiming anyone post certain pics that's been you since the beginning  ;)

watch the video Dorian kill  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 11, 2009, 01:47:47 PM
In some shots I see Yates at 97 and say man maybe he should have lost but in others it's business as usual just beating everyone
I didn't realize those shots you posted were from 1997.  Dorian is clearly ahead there.  I'll admit, however, that Nasser is more than holding his own in the shots from BB.  Same old story though, even if Nasser wins from the front, he loses from the side, gets killed from the back, and therefore loses.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 11, 2009, 02:20:40 PM
I didn't realize those shots you posted were from 1997.  Dorian is clearly ahead there.  I'll admit, however, that Nasser is more than holding his own in the shots from BB.  Same old story though, even if Nasser wins from the front, he loses from the side, gets killed from the back, and therefore loses.

yeah 97 and when I look at them I can see why he won

Nasser was an outstanding bodybuilder from the front his ab-thigh and front double biceps are among the best from anyone but he's not that same imposing force from the sides or the back and which is why his whole career was just ok 6 pro wins

and lets give him 1997 and 1996 for the sake of argument , he beat Dorian not at his best that says what? not much , Dorian at his best tramples Nasser at his without any debate it's not open for discussion so either way they're fucked
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 11, 2009, 09:08:42 PM
back to my sherief shalaby account again  ::)

not like ND who always posts pics of certain poses or fron certain angles to show dorian's superiority, here i am posting all the available shots from the video of this contest to make a fair nasser/dorian comparison..

Thanks for the great screenshots Sherief, totally shows Nasser clearly annihilating the competition!  I love how the Dorian nuthuggers only post back comparisons whereas you post them all.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 11, 2009, 09:10:47 PM
I'll work with you on the ab-thigh it could go either way and the front relaxed and front double biceps , Yates beat him in ALL of the other poses , see the side triceps for yet another pose Nasser can't seem to do





How is Yates beating Nasser on the side chest pose?  ::)

And on the side triceps you're saying that Nasser "can't seem to do" the pose simply because he doesn't hold his arms as far back as Dorian does?  Just because someone holds their arms further apart doesn't make their physique better.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 11, 2009, 09:12:11 PM
Thanks for the great screenshots Sherief, totally shows Nasser clearly annihilating the competition!  I love how the Dorian nuthuggers only post back comparisons whereas you post them all.

Well, I guess your admiration will have to act as a consolation prize in place of the Sandows that he never won.  I'm sure Nasser is still a little down from being a never was, why don't you be a chum and order a few more pairs of soiled underwear from him to chear him up.  I'm sure he'd appreciate it.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 11, 2009, 09:16:17 PM
Well, I guess your admiration will have to act as a consolation prize in place of the Sandows that he never won.  I'm sure Nasser is still a little down from being a never was, why don't you be a chum and order a few more pairs of soiled underwear from him to chear him up.  I'm sure he'd appreciate it.

A little down?  What does he have to be down over?  The fact that he's retired, financially independent, loved by women, is greeted daily by fans in public, receives tons of fan mail and gifts, views the Pacific Ocean from his home, drives three cars (at least), has been a millionnaire since he's 30, has no commitments and gets to enjoy doing whatever he wants? 
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Mr.1derful on August 11, 2009, 09:17:32 PM
A little down?  What does he have to be down over?  The fact that he's retired, financially independent, loved by women, is greeted daily by fans in public, receives tons of fan mail and gifts, views the Pacific Ocean from his home, drives three cars (at least), has been a millionnaire since he's 30, has no commitments and gets to enjoy doing whatever he wants? 

Damn, the soiled underwear business must be good!
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 11, 2009, 10:28:10 PM
A little down?  What does he have to be down over?  The fact that he's retired, financially independent, loved by women, is greeted daily by fans in public, receives tons of fan mail and gifts, views the Pacific Ocean from his home, drives three cars (at least), has been a millionnaire since he's 30, has no commitments and gets to enjoy doing whatever he wants? 

do you have to wear a colostomy bad because your rectum has literally been torn up by swarthy arab musc.................... ..........wait.......... ...........i gotta stop this insult.................. ...let me first apologize, and then reiterate the following concern:

you are mentally ill..............i feel very sorry for you..............to spend your 20s as a submissive, effimanate, hype-man, butt-boy............for an over the hill, wife-beating, nobody.................w ho still dresses like it is 1994... would be what i can only describe as a living hell.

it would be bad enough to be like that gay butler, who is in those pictures holding an umbrella over puff-daddy while he walks on the beach................... that would be dignity-draining in-and-of-it-self......................but you serve a NOBODY, someone no one cares about, who has no money or fame.

and the money thing, just stop it, i dont know exactly what nasshole does for money right now, i heard somewhere he, or his family has a garage.................. ...bet he is not now, nor ever was a millionaire............. ......as evidenced by his raggedy manner of dress, outdated clothing, and the fact that he has to make ends meet by selling his shit-stained posing trunks to muscle-queens online.

please address your mental illness..............you really must seek help.......i feel empathy for you..................sad ..................very very sad.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 11, 2009, 11:16:18 PM
Thanks for the great screenshots Sherief, totally shows Nasser clearly annihilating the competition!  I love how the Dorian nuthuggers only post back comparisons whereas you post them all.

also ND and the other dorian's boys never talk about any other poses beside the 7 mandatories, as if all other poses in each bodybuilder's routine and during the posedown are not counted.. dorian knew well they were counted and so avoided nasser during the posedown as it was crystal clear in the video ;)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 11, 2009, 11:22:55 PM
8)

when nasser was not contracting his abs in this pose he was totally destroying dorian in it..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 11, 2009, 11:41:36 PM
when nasser was not contracting his abs in this pose he was totally destroying dorian in it..

These guys think that the method in which you present a pose - like whether or not you crunch your abs during the front-lat spread, or if you hold your arms further apart in a 1/4 turn pose, or the amount of which you twist your torso during the side chest pose - implies whether your physique is ahead or not. 

In that 97 FLS comparison Nasser proved this to be not be the case as he's beating Dorian in his own version of the FLS spread.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 12, 2009, 12:20:38 AM
if we take a look at the side chest comparison between nasser and dorian on that certain day, firstly the lower body goes immediately to nasser who had clearly more developed and better looking quads.. as for the upper body nasser's shoulders were rounder and MUCH bigger than dorian's.. same can be said about arms, nasser's bicep was clearly bigger.. what about chest??.. the pose itself is called "side chest",.. was dorian's chest bigger or better looking than nasser's??.. of course not, nasser's chest, specially his upper chest was more developed and fuller, this was clear from the side exactly as it was from the front..

although this was hard for me i have put nasser's balls out of my mind to compare them in a fair way so you too dorian's boys try to put his balls out of your minds to be neutral ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Signifying Monkey on August 12, 2009, 12:22:57 AM


although this was hard for me i have put nasser's balls out of my mind

why are nassers balls on your mind in the first place?
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 12, 2009, 12:29:40 AM
why are nassers balls on your mind in the first place?

lol this was a clear joke idiot ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: bigbobs on August 12, 2009, 09:42:40 AM
if we take a look at the side chest comparison between nasser and dorian on that certain day, firstly the lower body goes immediately to nasser who had clearly more developed and better looking quads.. as for the upper body nasser's shoulders were rounder and MUCH bigger than dorian's.. same can be said about arms, nasser's bicep was clearly bigger.. what about chest??.. the pose itself is called "side chest",.. was dorian's chest bigger or better looking than nasser's??.. of course not, nasser's chest, specially his upper chest was more developed and fuller, this was clear from the side exactly as it was from the front..

although this was hard for me i have put nasser's balls out of my mind to compare them in a fair way so you too dorian's boys try to put his balls out of your minds to be neutral ;D

Thanks Sherief, it's incredible that after comparisons like this some guys still hae the nerve to claim that Dorian was better from the sides than Nasser.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=293166.0;attach=333837;image)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: delta9mda on August 12, 2009, 09:54:23 AM
also ND and the other dorian's boys never talk about any other poses beside the 7 mandatories, as if all other poses in each bodybuilder's routine and during the posedown are not counted.. dorian knew well they were counted and so avoided nasser during the posedown as it was crystal clear in the video ;)
he didnt have avoid someone that was not a threat.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 11:43:11 AM
also ND and the other dorian's boys never talk about any other poses beside the 7 mandatories, as if all other poses in each bodybuilder's routine and during the posedown are not counted.. dorian knew well they were counted and so avoided nasser during the posedown as it was crystal clear in the video ;)

Again you see what you want Nasser was following Yates' lead not the other way around and he addressed that he said he never seen him and he does stand right next to him in the video and starts trading shots


Dorian was the champ he sets the pace and Nasser chased him like a puppy
 
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 11:48:32 AM
These guys think that the method in which you present a pose - like whether or not you crunch your abs during the front-lat spread, or if you hold your arms further apart in a 1/4 turn pose, or the amount of which you twist your torso during the side chest pose - implies whether your physique is ahead or not. 

In that 97 FLS comparison Nasser proved this to be not be the case as he's beating Dorian in his own version of the FLS spread.

there is a method I already explained this to you and provided an example which clearly showed Nasser wasn't adhering to it


and FYI Dorian won with straights firsts which means Nasser didn't beat him in ANY pose  ;) I wont wait for the politics excuse because I know it's all you have left
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 12, 2009, 01:00:34 PM
if we take a look at the side chest comparison between nasser and dorian on that certain day, firstly the lower body goes immediately to nasser who had clearly more developed and better looking quads.. as for the upper body nasser's shoulders were rounder and MUCH bigger than dorian's.. same can be said about arms, nasser's bicep was clearly bigger.. what about chest??.. the pose itself is called "side chest",.. was dorian's chest bigger or better looking than nasser's??.. of course not, nasser's chest, specially his upper chest was more developed and fuller, this was clear from the side exactly as it was from the front..

although this was hard for me i have put nasser's balls out of my mind to compare them in a fair way so you too dorian's boys try to put his balls out of your minds to be neutral ;D
IMO, Dorian beats Nasser from the side.  Your analysis is based on technically two different poses given the different way Doz and Nasser hit the pose in this particular picture - they aren't at the same angle.  Here are some different comparisons from the side.  Nasser's noticably lumpy delts and biceps do look bigger in some shots; however, he is no where near the quality of Dorian in terms of condition.  As I have stated all along, if you watch the very video the Nasser club posted, it shows Dorian winning.  I am not taking anything away from Nasser, he was great, but not on the same level as Dorian.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 12, 2009, 01:08:13 PM
Here is some more video proof of Dorian's dominance.  This is 95, the same year you clowns think Doz was undeserving.  At least give credit where credit is due!

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=1995+mr.+olympia&hl=en&emb=0&aq=f#q=1995+mr.+olympia+prejudging&hl=en&emb=0
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 12, 2009, 01:45:30 PM
IMO, Dorian beats Nasser from the side.  Your analysis is based on technically two different poses given the different way Doz and Nasser hit the pose in this particular picture - they aren't at the same angle.  Here are some different comparisons from the side.  Nasser's noticably lumpy delts and biceps do look bigger in some shots; however, he is no where near the quality of Dorian in terms of condition.  As I have stated all along, if you watch the very video the Nasser club posted, it shows Dorian winning.  I am not taking anything away from Nasser, he was great, but not on the same level as Dorian.

your case is better than ND my friend,.. you have only one of dorian's balls in your mind while he has both balls and the dick in his mind 24/7 ;D (JOKE)..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 12, 2009, 01:50:39 PM
Here is some more video proof of Dorian's dominance.  This is 95, the same year you clowns think Doz was undeserving.  At least give credit where credit is due!

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=1995+mr.+olympia&hl=en&emb=0&aq=f#q=1995+mr.+olympia+prejudging&hl=en&emb=0

nasser was better from the front as always but dorian was much better from the back and his overall condition was amazing, as it's known for everybody this is dorian's best shape ever (after 93 because in 93 his left bi was still not torn).. it's funny how dorian after mr. olympia 96 kept saying that he was clearly better in 96 than in 95!!..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 12, 2009, 01:59:54 PM
nasser was better from the front as always but dorian was much better from the back and his overall condition was amazing, as it's known for everybody this is dorian's best shape ever (after 93 because in 93 his left bi was still not torn).. it's funny how dorian after mr. olympia 96 kept saying that he was clearly better in 96 than in 95!!..


do you even bother anymore to wear any sort of protection when you get assf@cked by men and swallow cum??........................ or because of the AIDS already festering inside of you, and the bitterness that accompanies it...................... is it you plan to transfer it to as many homosexual arabs as you can on your way down.

i heard this sort of thing often happens in your "community"..................i was hoping that at minimum, you can transfer it to Bobs, so he can transfer it to nasser.................. so all three of you can DIE 8) 8)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:04:23 PM
your case is better than ND my friend,.. you have only one of dorian's balls in your mind while he has both balls and the dick in his mind 24/7 ;D (JOKE)..



you seem to mention balls in mouth a lot fantasize much?  ;)

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 12, 2009, 02:07:25 PM
nasser was better from the front as always but dorian was much better from the back and his overall condition was amazing, as it's known for everybody this is dorian's best shape ever (after 93 because in 93 his left bi was still not torn).. it's funny how dorian after mr. olympia 96 kept saying that he was clearly better in 96 than in 95!!..
I think this was Dorian's best year despite the bicep tear because he was heavier than 93 & had equal condition.  Nasser takes the fdb and arguably the abs, but not much else.   It's nice see you give Dorian his due props  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:12:27 PM
nasser was better from the front as always but dorian was much better from the back and his overall condition was amazing, as it's known for everybody this is dorian's best shape ever (after 93 because in 93 his left bi was still not torn).. it's funny how dorian after mr. olympia 96 kept saying that he was clearly better in 96 than in 95!!..

You're delusional as usual to think Nasser beats Dorian from the front in 95 97 sure 95 , wont be entertained

and again everyone claims their best year is that year , Dorian pointed out his physique was more streamlined with a small waist , etc at the end of his career he sat down and came to the conclusion 95 was his best which many experts agree on , it's like Ronnie saying he was his best in 99 after the contest at the end of his run he said at least 3 times 98 was his best Olympia showing

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 12, 2009, 02:18:42 PM
Quote
You're delusional as usual to think Nasser beats Dorian from the front in 95 97 sure 95 , wont be entertained

this is exactly your problem. you close your mind to the idea that nasser might beat dorian from the front in 95, yet, the exact thing is true:

same with your dorian ronnie stuff. most of what real life shows, you 'won't entertain' and therefore completely miss... ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 12, 2009, 02:21:25 PM
ps peak Ronnie beats them both: :P
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:24:22 PM
this is exactly your problem. you close your mind to the idea that nasser might beat dorian from the front in 95, yet, the exact thing is true:

same with your dorian ronnie stuff. most of what real life shows, you 'won't entertain' and therefore completely miss... ::)

yeah sure it's true  ::) come back after you learn how contests are judged and then I'll except your apology

' real life ' showed you Dorian lost the 93 Olympia and Ronnie has more detailed calves , don't type ' real life ' because you weren't there despite telling the guys who were they're wrong

1995 was like 1993 Dorian destroyed everyone in everything from every angle in every pose , there was NO CONTEST and anyone who says otherwise is in denial of reality

and I said Dorian lost the front double biceps pose in 97 and 96 , and the ab-thigh could have gone either way , I can be objective and honest try it some time , Mr Dorian is the most overrated bodybuilder ever
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 12, 2009, 02:27:56 PM
more real life ND won't entertain:

dorian gets crushed by nasser AND a peak ronnie: hahaha
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:28:41 PM
ps peak Ronnie beats them both: :P

That's not 2001  ;) and it's called the side-chest pose NOT size delt pose another pose Ronnie sucks at much like the other loser , and still deathly afraid to post pics of peak Dorian  ;) I don't blame you because they shit all over Ronnie and Nasser

Balance & proportion , muscular bulk , density & dryness , posing & presentation , Dorian wins on ALL accounts

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 12, 2009, 02:31:03 PM
more real life ND won't entertain:

dorian gets crushed by nasser AND a peak ronnie: hahaha
Typical selective Hulkster comparison.  Dude is getting more and more desperate.  I mean, come on, how can even a biased idiot like you claim this is a fair comparison??
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 12, 2009, 02:31:37 PM
LOL ND as always posting close up shots of dorian ALONE, not realizing that its the comparisons where dorian gets crushed by nasser and peak ronnie

anyone looks pretty good alone.

even dorian.

put him in a comparison with someone else, and well, we know what happens:

 :'(
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 12, 2009, 02:33:14 PM
Isn't Ronnie quoted as saying Dorian has the best side chest ever? 
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:33:15 PM
Typical selective Hulkster comparison.  Dude is getting more and more desperate.  I mean, come on, how can even a biased idiot like you claim this is a fair comparison??

The best is he keeps proving me right  ;D I won him and he knows it

he is scared of fair I don't blame him Dorian tramples his hero hence why he posts nonsense
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Hulkster on August 12, 2009, 02:33:28 PM
Typical selective Hulkster comparison.  Dude is getting more and more desperate.  I mean, come on, how can even a biased idiot like you claim this is a fair comparison??

lol the excuses are out in full force when faced with the reality of the peak coleman physique, aren't they? ::)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:39:37 PM
Isn't Ronnie quoted as saying Dorian has the best side chest ever? 

and the thickest freakiest back he ever seen and this was 2003  ;D

Ronnie's side chest sucks never a strong pose for him , it's more like a side delt pose that's the downside of his short torso and long arms

this is a quote from Shawn Ray stating the obvious

Ronnies side chest leaves a lot to be desired when compared to people who can actually hit it right like Dexter and Jay. His side triceps shot is not one of the best in the business and he got exposed because of it

old news only one who doesn't get is fan-boys like Hulkster
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:44:53 PM
LOL ND as always posting close up shots of dorian ALONE, not realizing that its the comparisons where dorian gets crushed by nasser and peak ronnie

anyone looks pretty good alone.

even dorian.

put him in a comparison with someone else, and well, we know what happens:

 :'(

hahahah desperation continues , he was compared many times to Nasser and Ronnie in that very pose and kicked the shit out of both of them  ;)

nice shots you posted too LMFAO

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 12, 2009, 02:45:19 PM
Here are some great side chest shots of Doz
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:49:08 PM
lol the excuses are out in full force when faced with the reality of the peak coleman physique, aren't they? ::)

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 12, 2009, 02:51:12 PM
Here are some great side chest shots of Doz

textbook perfect
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Royal Lion on August 12, 2009, 03:02:09 PM
Here is my Hulkster impression.  "Look at Dorian dominating Ronnie in the front double biceps...."
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: karu on August 12, 2009, 06:36:02 PM
muslim homo, why are you talking to yourself?

Thanks Sherief, it's incredible that after comparisons like this some guys still hae the nerve to claim that Dorian was better from the sides than Nasser.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=293166.0;attach=333837;image)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 12, 2009, 08:23:12 PM

do you even bother anymore to wear any sort of protection when you get assf@cked by men and swallow cum??........................ or because of the AIDS already festering inside of you, and the bitterness that accompanies it...................... is it you plan to transfer it to as many homosexual arabs as you can on your way down.

i heard this sort of thing often happens in your "community"..................i was hoping that at minimum, you can transfer it to Bobs, so he can transfer it to nasser.................. so all three of you can DIE 8) 8)

wow i cant stop laughing you are so funny :-\
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 12, 2009, 08:35:11 PM
I think this was Dorian's best year despite the bicep tear because he was heavier than 93 & had equal condition.  Nasser takes the fdb and arguably the abs, but not much else.   It's nice see you give Dorian his due props  ;D

yes i mentioned it before many times that dorian was the best man onstage at mr. olympia 95.. nasser himself never argued about that.. i attack dorian's wins only when he didnt deserve them..

i believe dorian in 95 was not bigger than in 93, he was nearly the same weight.. lee haney presented him in the 95 mr. olympia video as 260 pounds while i read in flex he was 255 or 257.. may be haney was not so accurate because after all 3-5 pounds are not so valuable.. IMO his condition was a little bit better in 95 but i still go with his 93 shape with his full left biceps..
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 12, 2009, 08:42:08 PM
wow i cant stop laughing you are so funny :-\

i thought it was pretty funny................. :) :)
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 12, 2009, 10:19:08 PM
i thought it was pretty funny................. :) :)

yes but you are better than that i am sure.. i am waiting for your next "funny" comment :P
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: RocketSwitch625 on August 13, 2009, 03:46:06 PM
Here is my Hulkster impression.  "Look at Dorian dominating Ronnie in the front double biceps...."

No comparison. Yates wins.
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: RocketSwitch625 on August 13, 2009, 05:58:51 PM
Dorian Yates annihilating the competition a few years earlier:

Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: haider on August 13, 2009, 06:04:53 PM
Not this shit again you fucking girls!
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on August 13, 2009, 06:09:15 PM
Dorian Yates annihilating the competition a few years earlier:




DAMN Dorian just killed everyone that was just murder  ;D
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on August 13, 2009, 06:13:12 PM
yes i mentioned it before many times that dorian was the best man onstage at mr. olympia 95.. nasser himself never argued about that.. i attack dorian's wins only when he didnt deserve them..

i believe dorian in 95 was not bigger than in 93, he was nearly the same weight.. lee haney presented him in the 95 mr. olympia video as 260 pounds while i read in flex he was 255 or 257.. may be haney was not so accurate because after all 3-5 pounds are not so valuable.. IMO his condition was a little bit better in 95 but i still go with his 93 shape with his full left biceps..

In 95 he had an extra 5 pounds on his body that used to be in his left bicep
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: Sherief Shalaby on August 13, 2009, 10:51:24 PM
In 95 he had an extra 5 pounds on his body that used to be in his left bicep

do you think the weight of dorian's left bicep was 5 pounds before tearing it??.. if this is right so he was 2.5 pounds heavier and not 5 because he still had half his bicep after the tear ;D :-X
Title: Re: Mr. Olympia 1996 (Top 6 Placing)
Post by: MethodGNA on August 13, 2009, 11:35:56 PM
Dorian Yates annihilating the competition a few years earlier:



wow, that wasnt even fair..........he just demolished the rest of those guys...............nobod y looks as good as any of those dudes there now-a-days.............that probably right before insulin abuse hit big, they were mostlikely using it there, but not to the extent they would be a decade later