Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: blacken700 on September 16, 2009, 05:19:37 PM

Title: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: blacken700 on September 16, 2009, 05:19:37 PM


Bwa Ha Ha Ha Beck and the rest caught in their own stupidity That lady on the video DID NOT kill her husband.Police checked it out and her husband is alive and all is fine.It was the guy that did the video and Fox News that did not check out her 'silly story'
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: blacken700 on September 16, 2009, 05:27:07 PM
333386
Getbig V

Posts: 11199


    Acorn worker admits to murder on tape. (WTF is going on here???)
« on: September 15, 2009, 01:58:39 PM » Quote  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This bitch admits to premediated murder on tape!  She set up the scenario to kill her husband and talks about it like nothing.  This woman is going down hard!


JME
Getbig II

Posts: 99



    Re: Acorn worker admits to murder on tape. (WTF is going on here???)
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2009, 11:21:31 PM » Quote  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If it wasn't for FOX news you would and never known!



headhuntersix
Getbig V

Posts: 10929


GO PATS 09


    Re: Acorn worker admits to murder on tape. (WTF is going on here???)
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2009, 06:54:54 PM » Quote  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How much money were they supposed to get? Good job Barry.  



BILLY MIMNAUGH
Getbig IV

Posts: 3017


Getbig!


     --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The left doesnt do any in depth research.They simply mimick each other and cry "racism,racism" over and over.They simply only direct it towards republicans.Never heard one wonder why Robert Byrrd a recruiter for the Klan 
 
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Skip8282 on September 16, 2009, 05:40:40 PM
I'm a Fox News fan but this is just inexcusable, piss-poor journalism.  I checked other sources on the net and the cops are saying she hasn't done anything wrong.

Definitely a huge black-eye for Fox.

Ugh....
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 05:41:31 PM
that video looked authentic.  I saw no reason to believe otherwise..  If that lady lied, that's her stupidity, not the investigator.  She also decided to play along with them when the only thing she should have been doing was saying, "sorry we don't do that here, it's against the law"  Instead she gave them advice based on her fictional bullshit?  oh great, that's much better... not...
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 05:44:56 PM
I can't blame fox for this one.  There's a ton of valid shit to nail them on, this ain't it.  This is all on the stupid bitch at acorn that decided to go into fantasy land, give advice based on a fantasy she was "playing along with" ::) when she should have just said, "WTF, that's illegal and I can't advise you on that."  media matters does a good job on a lot of shit, this one they're in the wrong on. 
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: blacken700 on September 16, 2009, 05:52:17 PM
I can't blame fox for this one.  There's a ton of valid shit to nail them on, this ain't it.  This is all on the stupid bitch at acorn that decided to go into fantasy land, give advice based on a fantasy she was "playing along with" ::) when she should have just said, "WTF, that's illegal and I can't advise you on that."  media matters does a good job on a lot of shit, this one they're in the wrong on.  


are you fucking kidding me this is journalism you have to check your facts you just can't  go on the news and spew a bunch a shit and call it fact
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Skip8282 on September 16, 2009, 06:03:57 PM
I think they're wrong.  As journalists they do have an obligation to check facts.  And with Fox always getting beatdown, they're under more pressure than anybody to check for accuracy.  I still like Fox, but they dropped the ball on this one.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 06:35:35 PM

are you fucking kidding me this is journalism you have to check your facts you just can't  go on the news and spew a bunch a shit and call it fact
technically all they sad is that she admitted to killing her husband.  That's true, she did just that.  Plain and simple, she should have just said, "I can't help you, that's illegal."  Instead she launched into a fiction and it got reported.  Who's at fault, the person who launched the fiction or the person who reported it?  I'm going to give more blame to the liar and the person who unethically advised them based on a fiction.  I mean does it really matter if she killed her husband, she sat there advising these guys with that being the assumed truth and valid method of handling things in that business.  good grief, I hate fox noise but what this stupid bitch did was worse than fox reporting it.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: blacken700 on September 16, 2009, 06:42:59 PM
just curious Hugo what other news channel covered this story
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: gcb on September 16, 2009, 07:08:52 PM
technically all they sad is that she admitted to killing her husband.  That's true, she did just that.  Plain and simple, she should have just said, "I can't help you, that's illegal."  Instead she launched into a fiction and it got reported.  Who's at fault, the person who launched the fiction or the person who reported it?  I'm going to give more blame to the liar and the person who unethically advised them based on a fiction.  I mean does it really matter if she killed her husband, she sat there advising these guys with that being the assumed truth and valid method of handling things in that business.  good grief, I hate fox noise but what this stupid bitch did was worse than fox reporting it.

I'm sure there are man rambling delusional idiots out there (just check out this board) - maybe Fox can interview them. There is nothing illegal about being crazy or delusional - Fox fucked up pure and simple - this lady hasn't done anything wrong.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 08:44:28 PM
I'm sure there are man rambling delusional idiots out there (just check out this board) - maybe Fox can interview them. There is nothing illegal about being crazy or delusional - Fox fucked up pure and simple - this lady hasn't done anything wrong.
you see nothing wrong in advising a prostitute and pimp in the setup they wanted to start ::)  When they said what they wanted to do I probably would have called the cops.  At least told them to take a hike.  This lady encouraged the shit and made up a stupid story to make it sound like she was experienced with the advice.  And all you see here is what Fox did wrong?  Really?
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 08:50:54 PM
remember, this lady is working for an organization that recieves tax dollars.  I have no problem with this crap being reported even if she didn't actually kill anyone.  That she sat there and entertained their bullshit is worth reporting.  How can anyone defend the shit that came out of her mouth?  You guys act like it was on her own time or something.  She's working for acorn and representing them while she's working for them.  And that's the crap she spews?  She entertains a pimp and prostitute?  What?  hello???
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 09:05:25 PM
and again, fox reported that she confessed to a murder and running her own prostitution gig... That happens to be exactly true, she did indeed confess to these things.  That it was false, she had to answer to a police inquiry which makes it a new development in the story.  It doesn't make reporting it in the first place wrong...  what are you guys asking the media to do?  Conduct their own murder investigation to confirm it?  This went down as it should.  Now if Fox doesn't report the new development, that's something to nail them on.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: andreisdaman on September 16, 2009, 09:10:15 PM
technically all they sad is that she admitted to killing her husband.  That's true, she did just that.  Plain and simple, she should have just said, "I can't help you, that's illegal."  Instead she launched into a fiction and it got reported.  Who's at fault, the person who launched the fiction or the person who reported it?  I'm going to give more blame to the liar and the person who unethically advised them based on a fiction.  I mean does it really matter if she killed her husband, she sat there advising these guys with that being the assumed truth and valid method of handling things in that business.  good grief, I hate fox noise but what this stupid bitch did was worse than fox reporting it.


husbands and wives always joke about killing each other.....it's not NEWS
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 09:14:43 PM

husbands and wives always joke about killing each other.....it's not NEWS
this isn't on husband and wife bullshitting at a party time is it?  It's on Acorn time in the context that they're seeking money to start up this gig.  come on, keep it in context.  In context it is news and trust me, I wish this wasn't happening.  I expected better from Acorn employees.  This is way way not cool.  and you know I hate fox as much as the next person.  I've ragged on them here as much if not more than anyone.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: tonymctones on September 16, 2009, 10:06:07 PM

are you fucking kidding me this is journalism you have to check your facts you just can't  go on the news and spew a bunch a shit and call it fact
ahhh palin and every ignorant rumor run on msnbc during the campaign how many of those turned out to be?
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 10:26:39 PM
ahhh palin and every ignorant rumor run on msnbc during the campaign how many of those turned out to be?
that was national enquirer
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: tonymctones on September 16, 2009, 10:44:06 PM
that was national enquirer
lol msnbc also reported on ridiculous shit as well...iono if they ever picked up the story the nat enq ran but i wouldnt be suprised.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 10:46:19 PM
lol msnbc also reported on ridiculous shit as well...iono if they ever picked up the story the nat enq ran but i wouldnt be suprised.
the really far out stuff was NE
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: tonymctones on September 16, 2009, 10:48:16 PM
the really far out stuff was NE
i guess by blacken's standards 240 has no credibility either since he spouted those as truth... :-\
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 10:52:48 PM
i guess by blacken's standards 240 has no credibility either since he spouted those as truth... :-\
huh?
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: tonymctones on September 16, 2009, 10:54:51 PM
huh?
240 paroted the NE stories and spouted them off as truth so i guess by blacken's standards he lost his credibility as well.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 16, 2009, 11:15:03 PM
240 paroted the NE stories and spouted them off as truth so i guess by blacken's standards he lost his credibility as well.
i'm guilty of that too.  i'll admit.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: pedro01 on September 16, 2009, 11:34:47 PM
LOL !

I like the way this argument is about who is more dumb - Fox or the woman at Acorn.

US Politics is hitting an all time low right now. The whole country is looking like a Jerry Springer show.

Next week on Maury - Obama reveals his left wing tendencies to an unsuspecting Rush Limbaugh...

Democracy is dead - welcome to Jokeocracy
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: BM OUT on September 17, 2009, 06:19:24 AM
Another idiotic thread.The tape showed what she said.FOX didnt report it,they showed a tape of what an ACORN person said and repeated it.THe fact that you have a nut job bragging that she killed her husband,getting federal funds to advise people how to set up a brothel would offend most people.NOT Blacken though.To him,thats normal for groups like ACORN.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 17, 2009, 06:25:44 AM

are you fucking kidding me this is journalism you have to check your facts you just can't  go on the news and spew a bunch a shit and call it fact

You are a complete moron Blacken.  The police department even checked this out because they thought it was serious.  Additionally, this woman has previous husbands and also has a history of violence. 

Finally, she also gave advice for tax fraud and how to set up a child prostitution ring.  I guess you are ok with that? 
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: pedro01 on September 17, 2009, 06:29:16 AM
The problem as I see it is that most of you think this is a political issue. It is nothing to do with politics at all.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 17, 2009, 06:32:14 AM
The problem as I see it is that most of you think this is a political issue. It is nothing to do with politics at all.

Of course it is.  This org gets taxpayer dollars, lobby policticiens, "organizes the community", engages in election day activities, and has a an agenda they push. 

Who was their lawyer again?   
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: tonymctones on September 17, 2009, 07:11:13 AM
i'm guilty of that too.  i'll admit.
LOL  ;D
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: pedro01 on September 17, 2009, 07:28:41 AM
Of course it is.  This org gets taxpayer dollars, lobby policticiens, "organizes the community", engages in election day activities, and has a an agenda they push. 

Who was their lawyer again?   

Sorry - doesn't wash. I work for a company with 180,000 employees. Statistically speaking, one or 2 of them are bound to be nuttier than fruitcakes.

This is not a sign that:
- these people are typical of the organizations' employees
- these people have any say in managing the company
- that our company knows they are nuts
- that senior staff wouldn't get rid of them if they knew they were nuts

If one of our employees went and shot up a school in Japan, I would not expect everyone to blame our company.

This is not politics. It's entertainment. The problem is that many people in the US can no longer differentiate between the two.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 17, 2009, 07:29:45 AM
Sorry - doesn't wash. I work for a company with 180,000 employees. Statistically speaking, one or 2 of them are bound to be nuttier than fruitcakes.

This is not a sign that:
- these people are typical of the organizations' employees
- these people have any say in managing the company
- that our company knows they are nuts
- that senior staff wouldn't get rid of them if they knew they were nuts

If one of our employees went and shot up a school in Japan, I would not expect everyone to blame our company.

This is not politics. It's entertainment. The problem is that many people in the US can no longer differentiate between the two.

This went on in 8 offices!
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: blacken700 on September 17, 2009, 12:50:36 PM
You are a complete moron Blacken.  The police department even checked this out because they thought it was serious.  Additionally, this woman has previous husbands and also has a history of violence. 

Finally, she also gave advice for tax fraud and how to set up a child prostitution ring.  I guess you are ok with that? 

as i see it your the moron you believe everything beck tells you without doing one bit of research . your new name is Lloyd Christmas 
 
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Soul Crusher on September 17, 2009, 12:51:25 PM
as i see it your the moron you believe everything beck tells you without doing one bit of research . your new name is Lloyd Christmas 
 

www.biggovernment.com

Check out the police report at the site.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 17, 2009, 02:01:18 PM
The problem as I see it is that most of you think this is a political issue. It is nothing to do with politics at all.
you might call it a distraction and it is, but you can't say this isn't political.  That's funny shit.
Title: Re: Fox's Advocacy Nets Another Victim: Fox's Credibility
Post by: Hugo Chavez on September 17, 2009, 02:14:24 PM
Sorry - doesn't wash. I work for a company with 180,000 employees. Statistically speaking, one or 2 of them are bound to be nuttier than fruitcakes.

This is not a sign that:
- these people are typical of the organizations' employees
- these people have any say in managing the company
- that our company knows they are nuts
- that senior staff wouldn't get rid of them if they knew they were nuts

If one of our employees went and shot up a school in Japan, I would not expect everyone to blame our company.

This is not politics. It's entertainment. The problem is that many people in the US can no longer differentiate between the two.
Pedro my man, I won't be voting for you ;D

Hey look bud, you're way out there on this.  Your example doesn't even apply to this situation.  To make it apply your company would:
A.  Be engaged in political relevant issues on a National Level like Acorn is
B.  Recieve tax dollars and openly seeking more.
C.  Have had the employee nutty incident repeated in many locations by different employees.
D.  Have the nutty incident be an open offer to aid someone in an extremely illegal and unethical         endevour.

If your company meets that criteria, I guarantee it's news and people want to know about it.  Dems would be all over that story if it were a rightwing company helping republicans.