Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Sherief Shalaby on September 28, 2009, 03:14:42 PM
-
Not beside the wizard :o
-
I think Jay looks better. He's alot drier than Nasser and his abs and legs are far better. Nasser has better delts (probably uses way more oil in them than Jay does).
-
Jay looks better.
With Back double bi, even more.
-
Not beside the wizard :o
One of a 3 time Mr Olympia and one wishes he was ;D
-
jay did his thing in this one
-
-
is it just me or has the appearance of competitors changed dramatically (for the worse) since the 90's
Nasser is far superior in that shot with teh exception of thigh development but everything else such as conditioning, dryness and the overall quality of muscle.
I'm not even a fan of nasser
-
Nasser and a pic of a fridge? ???
-
Not beside the wizard :o
he owns your Nasser what your point?
-
I'll give Cutler quads over Nasser in that picture, but everywhere else Nasser dominates. Even their backs are comparable. You would probably notice the greatest contrast between the two if you were to compare their ab-thigh poses. BTW I haven't seen a pic of his ab-thigh pose from 2009 - does anyone have it?
Not only saying Nasser looked better than Jay there, but 2009 Mr. Olympia would probabably get 5th or 6th at any Mr. O from 1995 to 2000. Hide, who got 9th this year, would never even qualify to compete in the Olympia during those years. The quality has definitely gone down.
-
Also, Jay is 5'9" (I think?) and Nasser is 5'11 and a half inches, and in the comparison they are put at the same height, so Jay has a scaling advantage in taht comparison
-
I'll give Cutler quads over Nasser in that picture, but everywhere else Nasser dominates. Even their backs are comparable. You would probably notice the greatest contrast between the two if you were to compare their ab-thigh poses. BTW I haven't seen a pic of his ab-thigh pose from 2009 - does anyone have it?
Not only saying Nasser looked better than Jay there, but 2009 Mr. Olympia would probabably get 5th or 6th at any Mr. O from 1995 to 2000. Hide, who got 9th this year, would never even qualify to compete in the Olympia during those years. The quality has definitely gone down.
Jay = 3 Mr. Olympias, millionare, beautiful wife, successful at his chosen profession and a businessman, thousands of fans.
Nasser = 0 Mr. Olympias, hes broke, fucks low payed street hookers, sells shitstained underwear for a living, 4 e-buddies.
-
Jay = 3 Mr. Olympias, millionare, beautiful wife, successful at his chosen profession and a businessman, thousands of fans.
Nasser = 0 Mr. Olympias, hes broke, fucks low payed street hookers, sells shitstained underwear for a living, 4 e-buddies.
lol the thread was to compare their physiques, it must take a bitter man to try to turn the tides into a "who is more succesful or who has more fans" comparison.
FYI Nasser is a millionnaire and has been since age 30, and likely has more fans than Jay around the world. Anyway, back to the actual topic of the thread...
-
I'll give Cutler quads over Nasser in that picture, but everywhere else Nasser dominates. Even their backs are comparable. You would probably notice the greatest contrast between the two if you were to compare their ab-thigh poses. BTW I haven't seen a pic of his ab-thigh pose from 2009 - does anyone have it?
Not only saying Nasser looked better than Jay there, but 2009 Mr. Olympia would probabably get 5th or 6th at any Mr. O from 1995 to 2000. Hide, who got 9th this year, would never even qualify to compete in the Olympia during those years. The quality has definitely gone down.
More Bobs delusion , NO WAY shape or form are their backs comparable NO WAY , Jay's back is much better not in the Yates/Ronnie league but eons better than Nasser
That Jay would beat any version of Nasser because he's just as big better conditioned and he has a better back
-
More Bobs delusion , NO WAY shape or form are their backs comparable NO WAY , Jay's back is much better not in the Yates/Ronnie league but eons better than Nasser
That Jay would beat any version of Nasser because he's just as big better conditioned and he has a better back
I thought you would be a bit less biased in this instance. Anyway, Sherief posted back comparisons from Jay's 2007 Mr. O win with Nasser, perhaps he can repost them. I'd welcome anyone to make comparison pics of each of the mandatories from Jay's 2009 appearance, no way would he be better overall.
-
Jay pretty much destroys Nasser in every way possible.
-
I thought you would be a bit less biased in this instance. Anyway, Sherief posted back comparisons from Jay's 2007 Mr. O win with Nasser, perhaps he can repost them. I'd welcome anyone to make comparison pics of each of the mandatories from Jay's 2009 appearance, no way would he be better overall.
You're arguing a guy with one of the worse backs has a comparable back to one of the guys with one of the best backs today . It's typical of your delusion and yes I'm biased towards someone who has a back compared to someone who doesn't
Jay's back is thicker , just as wide if not wider and shows more detail & separation than Nasser , especially in the traps/teres/infraspinatus his back has depth & thickness that Nasser's does not
you can argue all day long if you'd like that Nasser is better but as far as backs are concerned you can't
and who said anything about 2007? ??? ??? ??? ???
-
lol the thread was to compare their physiques, it must take a bitter man to try to turn the tides into a "who is more succesful or who has more fans" comparison.
FYI Nasser is a millionnaire and has been since age 30, and likely has more fans than Jay around the world. Anyway, back to the actual topic of the thread...
Yeah, all the millionaires I know work in gas stations too ::) ::)
-
You're arguing a guy with one of the worse backs has a comparable back to one of the guys with one of the best backs today . It's typical of your delusion and yes I'm biased towards someone who has a back compared to someone who doesn't
Jay's back is thicker , just as wide if not wider and shows more detail & separation than Nasser , especially in the traps/teres/infraspinatus his back has depth & thickness that Nasser's does not
you can argue all day long if you'd like that Nasser is better but as far as backs are concerned you can't
Backs = comparable. Quads - Jay wins. Everywhere else - Nasser ahead by a mile, especially waist/abs. Overall = Nasser.
Yeah, all the millionaires I know work in gas stations too ::) ::)
Nasser does not have an employer or any boss he answers to
-
Backs = comparable. Quads - Jay wins. Everywhere else - Nasser ahead by a mile, especially waist/abs. Overall = Nasser.
Nasser does not have an employer or any boss he answers to
Wow thanks for proving your point as usual ::)
we'll just take your word for it ::)
-
Photo against photo isn't the way to judge. They truly need to be side by side to really judge the detail, thickness and symmetry. No one argues that Nasser looks great but it's hard to compare the two by a photo. You can say dexter looked better with photos or even heath, but when you actually saw Jay standing next to them he DESTROYED THEM.
-
Nasser does not have an employer or any boss he answers to
In this country we call that being unemployed
-
Photo against photo isn't the way to judge. They truly need to be side by side to really judge the detail, thickness and symmetry. No one argues that Nasser looks great but it's hard to compare the two by a photo. You can say dexter looked better with photos or even heath, but when you actually saw Jay standing next to them he DESTROYED THEM.
exactly but even in photos you can see Nasser's back doesn't compete
-
Cmon put up any front shot and Nasser destroys Jay. Nasser is wasp-waisted compared to him. Jays back is better but he doesnt have some kind of world beating back. For christ sakes his lower back skin folds up its not tight. Nassers back double bi looks better too because of his taper. It took the best back in history to keep Nasser from being Olympia and I dont think Jay is even in the same universe as King Dorian. Not a Nasser fan by the way
-
In this country we call that being unemployed
Right, because the more succesful people are usually "employees" ::)
Photo against photo isn't the way to judge. They truly need to be side by side to really judge the detail, thickness and symmetry. No one argues that Nasser looks great but it's hard to compare the two by a photo. You can say dexter looked better with photos or even heath, but when you actually saw Jay standing next to them he DESTROYED THEM.
Actually Jay has the advantage in that photo comparison because Sherief put them at the same height even though Jay is shorter. Dexter and Heath are not good examples as they are both smaller than Jay and solo pics don't show that as much, but with Nasser that's not the case.
-
Nasser clearly beats Jay in abdominal & thighs and maybe standing relaxed and you can argue front double biceps pose but all other poses Jay clearly bests Nasser
-
Cmon put up any front shot and Nasser destroys Jay. Nasser is wasp-waisted compared to him. Jays back is better but he doesnt have some kind of world beating back. For christ sakes his lower back skin folds up its not tight. Nassers back double bi looks better too because of his taper. It took the best back in history to keep Nasser from being Olympia and I dont think Jay is even in the same universe as King Dorian. Not a Nasser fan by the way
Thanks for keeping it real BigBuehl. Jay from last weekend was amazing but would not compare to this:
-
Will there ever be an end to these Nasser postings?
You twinks find any possible way to compare Nasser to anything.... >:(
-
More Bobs delusion , NO WAY shape or form are their backs comparable NO WAY , Jay's back is much better not in the Yates/Ronnie league but eons better than Nasser
That Jay would beat any version of Nasser because he's just as big better conditioned and he has a better back
Agreed.
-
Thanks for keeping it real BigBuehl. Jay from last weekend was amazing but would not compare to this:
Aren't those from all contests he lost? ???
Nasser wins the poses I mentioned but Jay would beat him any year you pick sans those shots
-
Nasser clearly beats Jay in abdominal & thighs and maybe standing relaxed and you can argue front double biceps pose but all other poses Jay clearly bests Nasser
Okay, so you're admitting that Nasser is better in 3 mandatories, and there are 7 mandatories in total - so that itself shows you do admit it is close at least. I would disagree that Jay beats Nasser in the side poses and the back poses which may go to Jay are not as decisive as Nasser beats Jay in front poses like the ab and thigh or front double biceps...therefore Nasser > Jay
-
Will there ever be an end to these Nasser postings?
You twinks find any possible way to compare Nasser to anything.... >:(
Actually I posted earlier that IMO 2009 Jay would get 5th or 6th in any Olympia from 95 to 2000, so therefore it's not just a matter of Nasser being better than him.
-
Okay, so you're admitting that Nasser is better in 3 mandatories, and there are 7 mandatories in total - so that itself shows you do admit it is close at least. I would disagree that Jay beats Nasser in the side poses and the back poses which may go to Jay are not as decisive as Nasser beats Jay in front poses like the ab and thigh or front double biceps...therefore Nasser > Jay
More than just poses my friend in a contest and there are eight mandatories 1) front double biceps 2) rear double biceps 3) ab-thigh 4) side chest 5) side triceps 6) front latspread 7) rear latspread 8) most muscular much to learn about competitive bodybuilding you still have ;)
don't forget the standing relaxed from the front , rear and the 1/4 turns which Nasser would win maybe the front one
Jay considered all this would clearly beat Nasser not closely
-
More than just poses my friend in a contest and there are eight mandatories 1) front double biceps 2) rear double biceps 3) ab-thigh 4) side chest 5) side triceps 6) front latspread 7) rear latspread 8) most muscular much to learn about competitive bodybuilding you still have ;)
don't forget the standing relaxed from the front , rear and the 1/4 turns which Nasser would win maybe the front one
Jay considered all this would clearly beat Nasser not closely
LOL, Okay, so I missed another mandatory which Nasser clearly beats Jay in. Thanks for clarifying and adding another reason why Nasser > Jay
-
nasser wins
-
LOL, Okay, so I missed another mandatory which Nasser clearly beats Jay in. Thanks for clarifying and adding another reason why Nasser > Jay
says you but then again you're the guy who thinks their backs are comparable :-\
and you missed more than just one mandatory ;)
-
i think jay takes the rls, nasser takes the rdb
-
The bottom line is that while Jay inevitably climbed the mountain to grab not just 1, but now 3 Sandows, Nasser took a detour to Synthol Land. Nasser struggled to win 1 Arnold title, while Jay won 3. Jay > Nasser. Physique vs physique, Jay still gets the nod, sorry. 2001, or even the Jay of this past weekend trumps any version of Nasser.
-
Hey bobs? Who's Nasser gonna beat for the 2010 Olympia title? ;D
-
This is crazy!!!! So Jay Cutler was #1 this year. Reality check: he would NOT have been #1, or not even in the top 6 from 1995-2000. He is not a quality bodybuilders, with size, sick conditioning, striations, cuts and definition all over.
Levrone was better than him.
Wheeler was better than him.
Yates was better than him.
Coleman was better than him.
Dillett was better than him.
Cormier was better than him.
Vince Taylor was better than him.
Haney was better than him.
Mike Francois was better than him.
Shawn Ray was better than him.
Nasser was better than him.
Here's a question? Many of those men did NOT win a single title, yet they were ALL in a different league than Cutler at HIS best.
-
alright i pretty much never post here but i thought this post was funny. if levrone and cormier are better then jay then why did he routinely beat them? levrone and cormier always beat dillett so i would say jay would as well. look at the contest history. everyone sees jay as a blcoky bber but when he stands next to some of these narrow bbers he puts them to shame. side by side he beats nasser+cormier+levrone etc. coleman and yates ok those are different but the rest jay would hold his own if not win. just look at this year when he was standing next to branch (another mass monster) at the end of the show and absolutley made him look like a child. just one white mans opinion by the way!
This is crazy!!!! So Jay Cutler was #1 this year. Reality check: he would NOT have been #1, or not even in the top 6 from 1995-2000. He is not a quality bodybuilders, with size, sick conditioning, striations, cuts and definition all over.
Levrone was better than him.
Wheeler was better than him.
Yates was better than him.
Coleman was better than him.
Dillett was better than him.
Cormier was better than him.
Vince Taylor was better than him.
Haney was better than him.
Mike Francois was better than him.
Shawn Ray was better than him.
Nasser was better than him.
Here's a question? Many of those men did NOT win a single title, yet they were ALL in a different league than Cutler at HIS best.
-
This is crazy!!!! So Jay Cutler was #1 this year. Reality check: he would NOT have been #1, or not even in the top 6 from 1995-2000. He is not a quality bodybuilders, with size, sick conditioning, striations, cuts and definition all over.
Levrone was better than him.
Wheeler was better than him.
Yates was better than him.
Coleman was better than him.
Dillett was better than him.
Cormier was better than him.
Vince Taylor was better than him.
Haney was better than him.
Mike Francois was better than him.
Shawn Ray was better than him.
Nasser was better than him.
Here's a question? Many of those men did NOT win a single title, yet they were ALL in a different league than Cutler at HIS best.
Fixed
In 2001 Jay served notice and actually beat Ronnie during the prejudging rounds. Ronnie may not have been at his all time best, but was still no slouch in 2001 either. Are we to believe that the physiques only a year prior to that in 2000 would have destroyed the 2001 version of Jay? Hardly. There are bodybuilders you list who were better, in theory only. Dillett could have been a monster unlike any ever seen before, but didn't amount to even a fraction of what he could have. Shawn Ray? Shawn never changed drastically from year to year. Where did Shawn place in 2001? Levrone, though accomplished, never really seemed to put it all together for the O. He had years where he looked very good, like 1995, but are we to believe 2001 Jay wouldn't be able to hang with him? He would have and may even defeat 1995 Levrone. Francois was very good, but never had a chance to explore his full potential and would not have defeated 2001 Jay or 2009 Jay. Nasser, well, Nasser was too one dimensional. Flex had the world by the balls, but not once did he ever come into the Olympia at his all time best. I'll put 2001 Jay against any Olympia version of Flex Wheeler, any day. All time best Flex, that might be different. Cormier? Could of, should of, would of, but didn't.
-
Not beside the wizard :o
stop you love for the cock. Nasser has no Olympia wins. get over it.
-
Photo against photo isn't the way to judge. They truly need to be side by side to really judge the detail, thickness and symmetry. No one argues that Nasser looks great but it's hard to compare the two by a photo. You can say dexter looked better with photos or even heath, but when you actually saw Jay standing next to them he DESTROYED THEM.
jay beat Ronnie when Ronnie was at his biggest....Nasser could never do that
edge goes to jay
-
selling used underwear to homosexual muslim bodybuilding groupies = successful?
Yes Nasser is the most successful bb
Right, because the more succesful people are usually "employees" ::)
Actually Jay has the advantage in that photo comparison because Sherief put them at the same height even though Jay is shorter. Dexter and Heath are not good examples as they are both smaller than Jay and solo pics don't show that as much, but with Nasser that's not the case.
-
This is crazy!!!! So Jay Cutler was #1 this year. Reality check: he would NOT have been #1, or not even in the top 6 from 1995-2000. He is not a quality bodybuilders, with size, sick conditioning, striations, cuts and definition all over.
Levrone was better than him.
Wheeler was better than him.
Yates was better than him.
Coleman was better than him.
Dillett was better than him.
Cormier was better than him.
Vince Taylor was better than him.
Haney was better than him.
Mike Francois was better than him.
Shawn Ray was better than him.
Nasser was better than him.
Here's a question? Many of those men did NOT win a single title, yet they were ALL in a different league than Cutler at HIS best.
agreed. Jay is Mr. O because no one good is around.
-
jay beat Ronnie when Ronnie was at his oldest, most torn and worst shape.
corrected for accuracy.
he was not at his biggest when Jay beat him. his biggest was 2004.
-
Not beside the wizard :o
no freakin doubt, all hail 3x uncrowned Mr Olympia, pussy melting machine, movie star good looks, dog trainer extraordinaire, HUGE.....Nasser el Sonbaty.
jt
-
Honestly, Hulkster's obsession with Ronnie, and Sharief and Bob's obsession with Nasser are just incredible. I don't think any form of Nasser would beat Jay, and only Ronnie in top form (98/99/03) would beat the 2009 version of Jay.
Jay dominated one of the most competitive lineups ever with straight firsts....give credit where credit is due.
-
Honestly, Hulkster's obsession with Ronnie, and Sharief and Bob's obsession with Nasser are just incredible. I don't think any form of Nasser would beat Jay, and only Ronnie in top form (98/99/03) would beat the 2009 version of Jay.
Jay dominated one of the most competitive lineups ever with straight firsts....give credit where credit is due.
Agree. This was Jay's 95 Olympia in one way.
If 97 Nasser had competed, he would have placed second because Jay would easily hold his own from the front and sides while blowing him away from the back.
-
Agree. This was Jay's 95 Olympia in one way.
If 97 Nasser had competed, he would have placed second because Jay would easily hold his own from the front and sides while blowing him away from the back.
Agreed.
It should also be noted that Nasser trained like a total pussy, that's why he never had the density required to be Mr olympia.
-
I'll give Cutler quads over Nasser in that picture, but everywhere else Nasser dominates. Even their backs are comparable. You would probably notice the greatest contrast between the two if you were to compare their ab-thigh poses. BTW I haven't seen a pic of his ab-thigh pose from 2009 - does anyone have it?
Not only saying Nasser looked better than Jay there, but 2009 Mr. Olympia would probabably get 5th or 6th at any Mr. O from 1995 to 2000. Hide, who got 9th this year, would never even qualify to compete in the Olympia during those years. The quality has definitely gone down.
yes bobs you are right here but i didnt want to scale it right because the assholes here were going to attack me thinking I am making nasser bigger!!..
i dont agree with you that jay's quads are better here, may be his left quad only, hahahhaa... and as we all know nasser of 95 or 96 was better than 98!!.. nasser's quads in 96 were close to the best ever (tom platz)..
-
agreed. Jay is Mr. O because no one good is around.
;D
-
yes bobs you are right here but i didnt want to scale it right because the assholes here were going to attack me thinking I am making nasser bigger!!..
i dont agree with you that jay's quads are better here, may be his left quad only, hahahhaa... and as we all know nasser of 95 or 96 was better than 98!!.. nasser's quads in 96 were close to the best ever (tom platz)..
I find it funny how both of you are at the same level of delusion , he feels his back is comparable to Jay's and both feel his quads are comparable to Platz . you guys way to highly of him
-
;)
-
and yes nasser was better from the side :o
-
and of course from the front, it was not even close here 8)
-
and as bobs said it's close from the back :P
-
jay's arms, chest, and shoulders are very soft comparing to nasser's.. he never ever reached this level of hardness ;)
-
As much as I hate Nasser, Jay wouldn't win an Olympia if he competed in the 90's.
-
As much as I hate Nasser, Jay wouldn't win an Olympia if he competed in the 90's.
and why do you hate the wizard you asshole?
-
lol the thread was to compare their physiques, it must take a bitter man to try to turn the tides into a "who is more succesful or who has more fans" comparison.
FYI Nasser is a millionnaire and has been since age 30, and likely has more fans than Jay around the world. Anyway, back to the actual topic of the thread...
beat Nasser you useless stain
no one gives a shit about you or your 10000 gimmicks.....low-life with only your dogs for company
and those pics...those f'cing pics....I'm over it....of you...in some low socio-economic dwelling, with your bargain price study desks and serious posture and gazes of someone who supposed to be crunching the numbers of a NASDAQ company.....
sad man......lonely man.....oily man
-
beat Nasser you useless stain
no one gives a shit about you or your 10000 gimmicks.....low-life with only your dogs for company
and those pics...those f'cing pics....I'm over it....of you...in some low socio-economic dwelling, with your bargain price study desks and serious posture and gazes of someone who supposed to be crunching the numbers of a NASDAQ company.....
sad man......lonely man.....oily man
are you sure you are not talking about yourself here?? :-\
-
Honestly, Hulkster's obsession with Ronnie, and Sharief and Bob's obsession with Nasser are just incredible. I don't think any form of Nasser would beat Jay, and only Ronnie in top form (98/99/03) would beat the 2009 version of Jay.
Jay dominated one of the most competitive lineups ever with straight firsts....give credit where credit is due.
Agreed
Only Ronnies top shape can beat this 2009 Jay.
-
and of course from the front, it was not even close here 8)
To me, you look like selfowning. :-\
-
To me, you look like selfowning. :-\
*POW* ;D
-
To me, you look like selfowning. :-\
to me you look like a blind pathetic kid :P
-
Agreed
Only Ronnies top shape can beat this 2009 Jay.
of course not, dorian of 93 or 95 would have beat any version of jay.. nasser at his best, flex at his best too would have beat him easily..
-
to me you look like a blind pathetic kid :P
Accrording to these pics you up, Nasser owns Jay with abs and thigh only.
Jay owns Nasser with the rest of all poses.
-
Accrording to these pics you up, Nasser owns Jay with abs and thigh only.
Jay owns Nasser with the rest of all poses.
and how do you see jay better than nasser in the side triceps for example??.. nasser's shoulder, tricep, abs, quad, and, calve all look better and sharper in this pose!!.. what else?..
if you take a neutral look at the FDB comparsion you will see clearly how nasser's physique looks better, symmetrical, and, more proportional.. shape wise jay is not as good as nasser and his left left and arm oversize his right, also his abs looks somehow wierd!!..
-
.... prime ronnie owns all...
HTH
-
It's all speculation. The bottom line is that Jay has 3 Mr.Os to Nasser's 0. No matter what, Jay will go down in history as the better bodybuilder. Big Bobs and Sharief have this strange insecurity, and so does Hulkster.....as soon as anyone begins praising another bodybuilder, e.g. Jay for kicking everyone's ass on Saturday, the Nasser and Ronnie pics begin flying up.
It seems like you all can't stand anyone receiving more attention and praise than your retired, forgotten (at least for Nasser) muscle heroes.
-
.... prime ronnie owns all...
HTH
very true.
-
Not beside the wizard :o
Keep dreaming ::)
-
It's all speculation. The bottom line is that Jay has 3 Mr.Os to Nasser's 0. No matter what, Jay will go down in history as the better bodybuilder. Big Bobs and Sharief have this strange insecurity, and so does Hulkster.....as soon as anyone begins praising another bodybuilder, e.g. Jay for kicking everyone's ass on Saturday, the Nasser and Ronnie pics begin flying up.
It seems like you all can't stand anyone receiving more attention and praise than your retired, forgotten (at least for Nasser) muscle heroes.
believe it or not i felt really happy for jay to win this year!!.. may be i am not a fan of his physique but he seems to be nice BIG guy.. i am just saying that he is not good enough to go with the top guys of the 90s like a prime yates or a prime wheeler or nasser, any of these guys at his best was better than jay this year..
-
More Bobs delusion , NO WAY shape or form are their backs comparable NO WAY , Jay's back is much better not in the Yates/Ronnie league but eons better than Nasser
That Jay would beat any version of Nasser because he's just as big better conditioned and he has a better back
Backs look pretty comparable to me, with Nasser having better arms/delts/hams/calves
(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/jaybackbi.jpg)
-
Backs look pretty comparable to me, with Nasser having better arms/delts/hams/calves
(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/jaybackbi.jpg)
Take off your rose colored glasses and look again.
-
Backs look pretty comparable to me, with Nasser having better arms/delts/hams/calves
(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/jaybackbi.jpg)
Yeah and there are seven mandatory poses and Nasser's back is comparable to Yates in 96 and Nasser's quads are almost as good if not better than Platz as usual you see what you want
-
Take off your rose colored glasses and look again.
Back detail and size are pretty similar in both pictures I posted. What are you seeing different in the two?
-
Back detail and size are pretty similar in both pictures I posted. What are you seeing different in the two?
One of these guys made Flex magazines list best backs and the other was no where to be found , comparable he says ;D
similar he says lol and he has Platz like quads , I could get your angle if you were being contrary but you actually believe the stuff you type :-\
-
Honestly, Hulkster's obsession with Ronnie, and Sharief and Bob's obsession with Nasser are just incredible. I don't think any form of Nasser would beat Jay, and only Ronnie in top form (98/99/03) would beat the 2009 version of Jay.
Jay dominated one of the most competitive lineups ever with straight firsts....give credit where credit is due.
how come people like Dorian yates had jay in third?
-
thread backfire
-
believe it or not i felt really happy for jay to win buying soiled panties this year!!.. may be i am not a fan of his physique but he seems to be nice BIG guy.. i am just saying that he is not good enough to go with the top guys of the 90s like a prime yates or a prime wheeler or nasser, any of these guys at his best was better than jay this year..
fixed
-
fixed
HA HA your are so funny :-X :-\ :-\ :-X
-
how come people like Dorian yates had jay in third?
where did you read that?
-
Nasser = bald and arab
Jay = Blond and white
On that alone, Jay already wins 8)
Take your sloppy ass somewhere and work on ledgers babbu...
-
Back detail and size are pretty similar in both pictures I posted. What are you seeing different in the two?
Nassers back looks watery there, Jays looks dry.
Nassers Hams are not better than Jays.
Their calves are pretty much close with Jays having more cuts.
ALSO
Jay has better arms and delts than Nasser since SYNTHOL and ESICLENE doesn't count for your hero Nasser.
-
Nasser raped Bodybuilding... and his following is killing Getbig...