Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: GymTime on March 14, 2010, 03:18:04 PM

Title: .
Post by: GymTime on March 14, 2010, 03:18:04 PM
.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Ex Coelis on March 14, 2010, 03:25:15 PM
Zack Khan looks great with a beard
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: JasonH on March 14, 2010, 03:27:16 PM
Your friend looks like he's carrying more fat than muscle. Not hating, just saying.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Wiggs on March 14, 2010, 03:27:28 PM
First off, Khan is offseason and looks to be taking a break from the sauce very clear from that pic.
Second, if your friend had bodyfat under 15% with actual definition in his arms perhaps the comparision would be legit.
Heath is at 4-5% bf, and dehydrated and his arms are still 21 inches.  If your friend was 4-5% bf and dehydrated, I'd give him 14-15 inches at best.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: che on March 14, 2010, 03:29:11 PM
First off, Khan is offseason and looks to be taking a break from the sauce very clear from that pic.
Second, if your friend was had bodyfat under 15% with actual definition in his arms perhaps the comparision would be legit.
Heath is at 4-5% bf, and dehydrated and his arms are still 21 inches.  If your friend was 4-5% bf and dehydrated, I'd give him 14-15 inches at best.
QFT
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: affeman on March 14, 2010, 03:34:33 PM

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764455802539_25828101_4306371.jpg)

LOL Are you blind? Compare Heaths left arm with the one of your buddy once again, maybe you can spot a slight difference? ::)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: clued-up on March 14, 2010, 03:44:24 PM
(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764458472189_25828101_4306374.jpg)

a lot of these pros seem to have abnormally small heads.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Meso_z on March 14, 2010, 03:44:37 PM
Here's a pic of a friend of mine at the arnold classic with supposedly some of the biggest arms in the biz.  These pros must all be really short, and when compared with eachother they look "big", but when next to a normal sized person who is in decent shape, they really dont look all that huge.  We need more arnold's and lou ferrigno's in this business....some truly huge bbers.

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764458472189_25828101_4306374.jpg)

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764455802539_25828101_4306371.jpg)

The main difference is that Zacks arms is 100% muscle while your "buddys" arm is skinny fat.

Its like taking an overweight dude next to a pro bodybuilder and claim that the overweight "owns" the bodybuilder.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Wiggs on March 14, 2010, 03:47:40 PM
(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764458472189_25828101_4306374.jpg)

a lot of these pros seem to have abnormally small heads.

When you go from a 180lbs 10% bf to 280% 10% bf the head doesn't grow.  Normal size head abnormal size bodies.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: James Blunt on March 14, 2010, 03:54:37 PM
First off, Khan is offseason and looks to be taking a break from the sauce very clear from that pic.
Second, if your friend had bodyfat under 15% with actual definition in his arms perhaps the comparision would be legit.
Heath is at 4-5% bf, and dehydrated and his arms are still 21 inches.  If your friend was 4-5% bf and dehydrated, I'd give him 14-15 inches at best.
This is quite true.

Oh yeah, simply huge... Friends don't let friends wear T-shirts that are too small for them. Tell that guy that shirt is ridiculous.

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764455802539_25828101_4306371.jpg)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: just_a_pilgrim on March 14, 2010, 03:57:47 PM
Unless you have dieted down before you don't realise what you've got to lose to get that lean. You look much bigger with the shirt off but with it on you look smaller.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: balight on March 14, 2010, 04:00:56 PM
I guess he wanted to say, Zack Khan looks like a fuckin' giant if he stands alone. Now next to a normal person, he inst so  mindblowingly huge. Here we're just talking about physical dimensions, not hardness, bf, etc.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: delta9mda on March 14, 2010, 04:04:35 PM
First off, Khan is offseason and looks to be taking a break from the sauce very clear from that pic.
Second, if your friend had bodyfat under 15% with actual definition in his arms perhaps the comparision would be legit.
Heath is at 4-5% bf, and dehydrated and his arms are still 21 inches.  If your friend was 4-5% bf and dehydrated, I'd give him 14-15 inches at best.
this
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Ex Coelis on March 14, 2010, 04:05:19 PM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v353/dekethecreep/2001933364379884654_rs-3.jpg)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Parker on March 14, 2010, 04:09:35 PM
Zach Khan's forearm is as big as that dude's upper arm. And so is Phil Heath's.

Have your friend diet down enough, where you can actually see definition.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 14, 2010, 04:27:58 PM
I was in a gym once with DJ and let me tell his arms are massive made my 19s look like twigs.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Wiggs on March 14, 2010, 04:31:02 PM
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.  regardless...the point was that these guys dont look so huge next to a normal person.  they are all short, and by themselves look like monsters...but next to a normal 6' guy, they dont look quite so impressive.  

So you're saying that guy in those pics if dieted down to 4-5% bf would have 17-18 inch arms?  Bull-fucking shit.  Because the amount of fat on that arm now with zero definition would put his arms at 19 or 20 inches now.  Are you saying his arms are 19 or 20?  18 at best now and 16 at best dieted down....AT BEST.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on March 14, 2010, 04:37:43 PM
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.

Haha no.  ::) What if we split the argument and say 16.  ;)

Right now I mean.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Per Se on March 14, 2010, 04:38:18 PM
are you BLIND????

In the pics u posted, Khan and Heath's arms look WAAAAAAY thicker!  ::)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on March 14, 2010, 04:44:02 PM
You could have an argument with Khan's shoulders and Heath's width but not much with their arms.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Parker on March 14, 2010, 04:49:08 PM
Even with angle on Phil's arms he looks like he has you friend by 3-4 inches, not including definition and thickness, dieted down, that disparity would possibly grow to 5-6 inches. So roughly your friend would look like a string bean compared to Heath
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: TRIX on March 14, 2010, 04:51:53 PM
Brutal myspace angles. Khan destroys your friend. You is starting closer to the camera and more side on. You are a fucking idiot.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Skeletor on March 14, 2010, 04:58:16 PM
I agree it's mostly angle and also on the bodyfat issue, if normal people dieted down to low bodyfat they would be tiny.

Look at this:

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Mabl3TIPbFQ/0.jpg)

(http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8489/erw.jpg)

and then this:

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/Su9dWgV1AwI/AAAAAAAABkQ/rBupKWZdNaA/s400/1998-mr-olympia-291ronnie-coleman++copy.jpg)

(http://www.bodyhighlights.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/ronnie_and_mo.jpg)

 8)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: benchmstr on March 14, 2010, 04:59:26 PM
bench
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 14, 2010, 05:01:16 PM
Now that bitch has some arms.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: TrueGrit on March 14, 2010, 05:06:19 PM
Bigbobs  VS Dexter

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=281478.0;attach=321497;image)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 14, 2010, 05:11:37 PM
Dex is off in that pic FACT
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: lesaucer on March 14, 2010, 05:12:20 PM
I agree it's mostly angle and also on the bodyfat issue, if normal people dieted down to low bodyfat they would be tiny.

Look at this:

(http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Mabl3TIPbFQ/0.jpg)

(http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8489/erw.jpg)

and then this:

(http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_mC1TEdZ4gks/Su9dWgV1AwI/AAAAAAAABkQ/rBupKWZdNaA/s400/1998-mr-olympia-291ronnie-coleman++copy.jpg)

(http://www.bodyhighlights.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/ronnie_and_mo.jpg)

 8)

tell me that second pic of coleman is shoped right?
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Skeletor on March 14, 2010, 05:16:34 PM
The calves probably are  ;)

but here is the article that has more pics (stills actually)

http://www.getbig.com/news/2005-02/062305tonight.htm (http://www.getbig.com/news/2005-02/062305tonight.htm)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: James Blunt on March 14, 2010, 05:26:22 PM
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.  regardless...the point was that these guys dont look so huge next to a normal person.  they are all short, and by themselves look like monsters...but next to a normal 6' guy, they dont look quite so impressive. 
The guy has no definition a.d they look 17 at the very biggest. That's no knock on the guy it's just a real observation. who are you trying to fool here  ???
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Lion666 on March 14, 2010, 05:40:29 PM
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.  regardless...the point was that these guys dont look so huge next to a normal person.  they are all short, and by themselves look like monsters...but next to a normal 6' guy, they dont look quite so impressive

yes they do,,, even more impressive, especially when they are 2-3x as wide as the "normal" guy.  wider you get the shorter you look,,, lanky looks taller.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: JOCKTHEGLIDE on March 14, 2010, 05:47:45 PM
let me guess,,,your friend is
6ft,,
medium size shirt
claims 18inch arms with 30% bodyfat

so you compare to heat and khan who even khan is at 8% bodyfat vs your friends 30% bodyfat that your friends are bigger in comparions,,,khan gets up to 300lbs off season with 12 bodyfat your friend would get dwarf if khan was not dieted down or even heath who is offseason is 280 with true 24inch arms vs those,,,22inches there,,, ::) next post your gonna tell me your friend is not lifting weights,,,look hwo big he is no liftss weights vs heath,,,so small
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: bigbobs on March 14, 2010, 05:56:38 PM
Bigbobs  VS Dexter

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=281478.0;attach=321497;image)

good find :)

Dex is off in that pic FACT

How can you say that for "fact"  ??? ::)  In actuality that picture was taken one week after the 2007 Olympia, so he was as on as ever, however he was very lean.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: bigbobs on March 14, 2010, 05:58:45 PM
As for the topic of the thread, this is pretty dumb.  Not everyone looks their best in every single photo taken.  People only share their own few best photos but expect each pro to look exceptional in each pic that's taken of them.  

Besides, in this example Zack's head looks one-half the size of your friend's which suggests there's a big scaling disadvantage, and not sure wha point the heath pic is making, if anything its contrary to the point you are trying to make.

Reminds me of when Groink and a few others were saying its a "fact" that Nasser now weighs no more than 240 or 250 lbs simply based on how others looked in pictures compared to him lol, then he posted a weigh-scale video disproving this
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: American Muscle on March 14, 2010, 05:59:53 PM
Wow!! "Simply Huge" and his crew are some big mofos, that's for sure.



























(chuckle)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Mr Nobody on March 14, 2010, 06:02:24 PM
Groink has them beat.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: JOCKTHEGLIDE on March 14, 2010, 06:05:13 PM
Groink has them beat.
not compared to simplyhuge friend,,,,
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Parker on March 14, 2010, 06:15:51 PM
Don't get your panties in a bunch....your midgets with muscles will still pose for you in their glittering thongs.  it was only an observation that they dont look as impressive next to normal "statured" people.  next to other muscle midgets they look big tho, or by themselves.
Ronnie is about 5'11 and when in shape had legit 24s. Now, Phil's are about 21s or so, but your friend has zero defintion, separation, or thickness. He's not impressive at all. Plus he's wearing a small shirt, and we can see, he has a belly, he has no flatness to it. Your friend is 6 foot and that is it. Nothing to see here. You put Phil's arms on him and then, he'd be impressive.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: bigbobs on March 14, 2010, 06:26:46 PM
Ronnie is about 5'11 and when in shape had legit 24s. Now, Phil's are about 21s or so, but your friend has zero defintion, separation, or thickness. He's not impressive at all. Plus he's wearing a small shirt, and we can see, he has a belly, he has no flatness to it. Your friend is 6 foot and that is it. Nothing to see here. You put Phil's arms on him and then, he'd be impressive.

I think SimplyHuge was basically expecting that these pros will look like cartoon or fantasy characteristics like the cartoon-version of the Hulk or HeMan dwarfing every human in sight lol.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: American Muscle on March 14, 2010, 06:32:02 PM
I think SimplyHuge was basically expecting that these pros will look like cartoon or fantasy characteristics like the cartoon-version of the Hulk or HeMan dwarfing every human in sight lol.

Haha...Maybe "SimplyHuge" is still quite childlike at heart.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: balight on March 14, 2010, 06:36:35 PM
I think SimplyHuge was basically expecting that these pros will look like cartoon or fantasy characteristics like the cartoon-version of the Hulk or HeMan dwarfing every human in sight lol.

Because alone they actually do  LOOK like cartoon characters nowdays, so you expect them to be huge next to you. I don't get it why are you all talking smack about SimplyHuge-s friend. No one  said he is impressive/has a good build, SimplyHuge just said he isn't a  midget, has some mass, therefor he could be the a "average weight lifter". And next to him, a pro surprisingly doesn't look so huge. Stop the roidrage guyz.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: JOCKTHEGLIDE on March 14, 2010, 07:08:47 PM
Don't get your panties in a bunch....your midgets with muscles will still pose for you in their glittering thongs.  it was only an observation that they dont look as impressive next to normal "statured" people.  next to other muscle midgets they look big tho, or by themselves.
and yet you talk about these midgets with muscles like you worship them eveyr move,,, ::) hecne why you came to getbig my fiend
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Earl1972 on March 14, 2010, 07:16:23 PM
your friend is getting owned

E
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: geneticmarvel on March 14, 2010, 07:28:35 PM
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.  regardless...the point was that these guys dont look so huge next to a normal person.  they are all short, and by themselves look like monsters...but next to a normal 6' guy, they dont look quite so impressive. 

Bodybuilders are small men with freakishly huge muscles. A regular 5'8" 160lb dude will definitely look fucked up if he were to gain 100lbs+ of lean muscle, especially when his puny to begin with head doesnt grow one single bit. Most of the largest bbers from the 90s were inherently big guys ie Nasser, Fux, Ruhl, Gunter, Richards. Nowadays you have inherently small pros attempting to match those size numbers and they end up looking like a foolish cartoon character.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: LITTLE JOHN on March 14, 2010, 07:51:21 PM
All very good points.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: mesmorph78 on March 14, 2010, 08:14:47 PM
I think there is a very big difference in size ... And as already mentioned these guys are ripped ur friend isn't yet still their arms are a LOT bigger...
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: jaejonna on March 14, 2010, 08:24:14 PM
simply huge needs a new set of glasses hahahah your 'freind' is getting destroyed lol hahah
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: big ban on March 14, 2010, 08:27:47 PM
The main difference is that Zacks arms is 100% muscle while your "buddys" arm is skinny fat.

Its like taking an overweight dude next to a pro bodybuilder and claim that the overweight "owns" the bodybuilder.

True true  :)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Parker on March 14, 2010, 08:43:21 PM
simply huge needs a new set of glasses hahahah your 'freind' is getting destroyed lol hahah
Can you imagine if he stood next to a prime Marko or Ronnie...destroyed ain't the word. And Phil's arms aren't the biggest, he's about 236, so his arm are probably 21.5-22s, but it's the sick detail and tris that make them look huge.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: JOCKTHEGLIDE on March 14, 2010, 08:57:53 PM
Can you imagine if he stood next to a prime Marko or Ronnie...destroyed ain't the word. And Phil's arms aren't the biggest, he's about 236, so his arm are probably 21.5-22s, but it's the sick detail and tris that make them look huge.
only f you fckin knew,,parker I measured heaths arm before and it is a legit 24 in the off season,,,this is no joke thats off season
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Matt C on March 14, 2010, 09:13:06 PM
Here's a pic of a friend of mine at the arnold classic with supposedly some of the biggest arms in the biz.  These pros must all be really short, and when compared with eachother they look "big", but when next to a normal sized person who is in decent shape, they really dont look all that huge.  We need more arnold's and lou ferrigno's in this business....some truly huge bbers.

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764458472189_25828101_4306374.jpg)

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764455802539_25828101_4306371.jpg)

In terms of the amount of sheer volume pro bodybuilders occupy, I agree with you.  Although the same argument can be made of obese people in comparison with these bodybuilders.  Also, pros like Gunter would not look as small next to your friend - height is a large part of the illusion illustrated above.

PS - Phil looks great in that picture.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: MJK on March 14, 2010, 09:14:26 PM
never said the friend was "huge"...just that the so-called "huge" bbers dont look taht impressive next to someone of a normal stature.  post a few of the pics of "kahn" that have been floating around where he is posing by himself adn the guy looks like a beast...next toa  normal person he is still big, but doesnt have even close to the same "wow" factor.

its obvious though that I have offended some of the muscle worshippers here. 
Apparently most posters don't see what you're trying to get across. IQ on this forum is questionable.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Wiggs on March 14, 2010, 09:19:08 PM
Apparently most posters don't see what you're trying to get across. IQ on this forum is questionable.

No we understand fine, he's just wrong.  The guy is 6ft tall normal looking guy and Phil and Zack still look impressive.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: MJK on March 14, 2010, 09:20:24 PM
No we understand fine, he's just wrong.  The guy is 6ft tall normal looking guy and Phil and Zack still look impressive.
Yes, but not as impressive as when he stands alone.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Parker on March 14, 2010, 09:21:06 PM
only f you fckin knew,,parker I measured heaths arm before and it is a legit 24 in the off season,,,this is no joke thats off season
Yeah, I figured 24s in off season, so roughly knock about 2 inches off? It's that sick detail that gets people.

Simplyhuge, Phil is 236, so he is not "huge", even Flex Wheeler at 5'10 when he was at the Mr O in 93 was 218. It's the look, that is what it is. All I see is a dude who is 6 foot next to Khan, and he still destroys him. The wow factor is still there. Even with Phil...I understand you saying they lose their wow factor standing next to a 6 footer, but if that 6 footer were in shape, it be different. But then, Toney Freeman is a 6 footer, how would your friend look next to him, or Gunter? Not very impressive. And remember, Phil placed ahead of Toney.

But, the fact remains that because I see soo many pics, I don't get the wow factor anymore...
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: SF1900 on March 14, 2010, 09:25:22 PM
I kind of get what he's saying. Obviously when you have something standing along with no comparison it looks amazing. For example, if you get an A- on a midterm it looks pretty damn good by itself. However, if your friend gets an A+, then your A- does not look AS impressive when it's next to the A+.  However, I still look Phil looks amazing standing next to your friend--perhaps just as impressive as when standing along. But like I said, I kind  of get what you're saying; unfortunately, your friend is not someone to stick next to Phil Heath. Maybe if someone with Groinks arms stood next to Phil I can get that impression more.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Wiggs on March 14, 2010, 09:31:56 PM
Yes, but not as impressive as when he stands alone.

What is impressive about pros is the thickness, width, (not in Heath's case) musclemass, definition, separation and low bf....99% of the time not the height.

You are arguing a moot point  I can put a tank next to them and say they don't look as impressive as when they stand alone...No shit.  What's they point of saying that?
These are even more impressive when standing next to normal people...Thing is if the normal people were standing with the pros thonged up you'd see how much more impressive the pros are.

All is equal with clothes on but when the clothes come off and the thong slides on it's a pros world baby 8)

 ;D :D :-X

 ;D
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Valane on March 14, 2010, 09:38:19 PM
A lot of fags in this thread.

The TS has a point, you put a normal sized, reasonably built guy in the picture and it reduces the wow factor.

Why everyone is having a hissy fit over this god only knows.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Wiggs on March 14, 2010, 09:42:18 PM
A lot of fags in this thread.

The TS has a point, you put a normal sized, reasonably built guy in the picture and it reduces the wow factor.

Why everyone is having a hissy fit over this god only knows.

No it doesn't it shows you how much better they look than normal people. 
Like I said, in clothes perhaps not so much.  Thonged up, they expose normal peoples' flaws and make themselves look that much better
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: pluck on March 14, 2010, 10:11:42 PM
Are you seriously comparing your pasty buddy to Kahn?

What the fuck are you smoking? I bet you're one of the dumb motherfuckers that thinks if you get a hold of some test then you can be Mr.O in a few years.

The delusion is strong with this one.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Valane on March 14, 2010, 10:16:28 PM
No it doesn't it shows you how much better they look than normal people. 
Like I said, in clothes perhaps not so much.  Thonged up, they expose normal peoples' flaws and make themselves look that much better

Lol, Better isn't the word i would use, but each to their own.

A tall guy with good mass and lines like paris would make Khan and Phil look like shit.

The sport has regressed.


Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: MadeYaMelt on March 14, 2010, 11:18:16 PM
Lol, Better isn't the word i would use, but each to their own.

A tall guy with good mass and lines like paris would make Khan and Phil look like shit.

The sport has regressed.




QFT.  What a mess. 

(http://www.emforma.net/wp-content/gallery/zack-khan/zack-khan-9.jpg)

(http://www.bodybuilders.com/paris27.jpg)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: bigbobs on March 14, 2010, 11:46:34 PM
QFT.  What a mess. 

(http://www.emforma.net/wp-content/gallery/zack-khan/zack-khan-9.jpg)

(http://www.bodybuilders.com/paris27.jpg)

Khan is destroying the guy underneath - is that this Paris guy you speak of?

The Muslim makes him look like a twig
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Skeletor on March 14, 2010, 11:53:04 PM
Yes even his belly button dwarfs Paris'

Brutal hairline
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: MadeYaMelt on March 14, 2010, 11:58:01 PM
Khan is destroying the guy underneath - is that this Paris guy you speak of?

The Muslim makes him look like a twig

The "Muslim" should pray to "Allah" for some aesthetics.  It's the only thing that could help the bloated mess at this point. 

(http://panachereport.com/channels/more%20short%20stories/images/bobparis11.jpg)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Wiggs on March 14, 2010, 11:58:04 PM
QFT.  What a mess. 

(http://www.emforma.net/wp-content/gallery/zack-khan/zack-khan-9.jpg)

(http://www.bodybuilders.com/paris27.jpg)

Gee what a fair comparision ::)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: MadeYaMelt on March 15, 2010, 12:03:30 AM
Gee what a fair comparision ::)

I didn't bring up the idea of Paris vs. Khan, I think Valane did.  The point is, Khan is nothing more than a bloated mass of meat with no flow to his physique.  Course, this is nothing new in modern bodybuilding...   
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Figo on March 15, 2010, 02:55:58 AM
A false belief based on incorrect inference about external reality that is firmly sustained despite what almost everybody else believes and despite what constitutes incontrovertible and obvious proof or evidence to the contrary. The belief is not one ordinarily accepted by other members of the person's culture or subculture.

(http://bartblog.bartcop.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/deluded.jpg)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Earl1972 on March 15, 2010, 01:49:22 PM
never said the friend was "huge"...just that the so-called "huge" bbers dont look taht impressive next to someone of a normal stature.  post a few of the pics of "kahn" that have been floating around where he is posing by himself adn the guy looks like a beast...next toa  normal person he is still big, but doesnt have even close to the same "wow" factor.

its obvious though that I have offended some of the muscle worshippers here. 

maybe you just feel guilty for setting up your innocent friend for an owning

your friend is a big guy, but being a few inches taller and much softer doesn't make ALL OF OUR  muscle heroes look less impressive :)

E
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Valane on March 15, 2010, 02:00:39 PM
Khan is destroying the guy underneath - is that this Paris guy you speak of?

The Muslim makes him look like a twig


Bob you goofy looking guy, keep your racist rambling out of it.

Paris makes Khan look like even more of a retard than normal.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Tito24 on March 15, 2010, 02:58:15 PM
So you're saying that guy in those pics if dieted down to 4-5% bf would have 17-18 inch arms?  Bull-fucking shit.  Because the amount of fat on that arm now with zero definition would put his arms at 19 or 20 inches now.  Are you saying his arms are 19 or 20?  18 at best now and 16 at best dieted down....AT BEST.

Look at his forearms? not a single cut, vein, or anything. i see 12.5 inch guns at pro level body-fat..
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 15, 2010, 03:01:48 PM
Khan is destroying the guy underneath - is that this Paris guy you speak of?

The Muslim makes him look like a twig

you are an embarrassment to Muslims everywhere......you are an embarrassment to your family.....you are an abberition in the eyes of god
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: kyomu on March 15, 2010, 03:24:40 PM
Pics lie a lot. The video is near from the truth.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: DK II on March 15, 2010, 03:29:07 PM
LOL Are you blind? Compare Heaths left arm with the one of your buddy once again, maybe you can spot a slight difference? ::)

LOL, i thought the same thing. That guy must be a tad delusional, don't you think??
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Tito24 on March 15, 2010, 03:35:58 PM
LOL, i thought the same thing. That guy must be a tad delusional, don't you think??


X2

simply huge is comparing gems and turds..Not a fair comparison.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: IrishMuscle84 on March 15, 2010, 06:56:23 PM
Shit.........heaths forearm has another bicep growing on it.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: KevinP85 on March 15, 2010, 10:53:56 PM
If I remember correctly "simplyhuge," isn't too tall himself. 5'8, 5'9 max and you are calling bber's midgets???
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: alnassak on March 15, 2010, 11:40:24 PM
Here's a pic of a friend of mine at the arnold classic with supposedly some of the biggest arms in the biz.  These pros must all be really short, and when compared with eachother they look "big", but when next to a normal sized person who is in decent shape, they really dont look all that huge.  We need more arnold's and lou ferrigno's in this business....some truly huge bbers.

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764458472189_25828101_4306374.jpg)

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764455802539_25828101_4306371.jpg)


Yeah, you are right; I have always felt that my arms are as big as Coleman’s   ;D :P
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: ChristopherA on March 16, 2010, 09:12:58 AM
I def think Kahn is off the juice in that pic. Kinda kills me everyone wants to see these guys friggin huge year round but if they arent sauced to the max its "I look as big as a pro." I dont think SimplyHuge was comparing his friends build to Kahn by any means and everyone is jumping all over him a little. Pictures dont do pros much justice because you dont see the front to back thickness these guys have. I remember Chris Bennet doing a seminar at my gym and his arms were foooking huge(I know he was a synthol guy just saying). My might have been 17 at the time and it seemed like they were 24. Just crazy in person. PJ Braun too, met him and his arms dint even seem real they were so big. They arent even top-tier BBs either.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Danimal77 on March 16, 2010, 11:45:43 AM
Zack Khan looks great with a beard

No no homo????
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Danimal77 on March 16, 2010, 11:48:39 AM
This is quite true.

Oh yeah, simply huge... Friends don't let friends wear T-shirts that are too small for them. Tell that guy that shirt is ridiculous.

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764455802539_25828101_4306371.jpg)

Judging the length of this t-shirt (coming to his navel), it looks like his mother kept it in the dryer to long..... ::)
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: funk51 on March 16, 2010, 12:40:45 PM
Here's a pic of a friend of mine at the arnold classic with supposedly some of the biggest arms in the biz.  These pros must all be really short, and when compared with eachother they look "big", but when next to a normal sized person who is in decent shape, they really dont look all that huge.  We need more arnold's and lou ferrigno's in this business....some truly huge bbers.

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764458472189_25828101_4306374.jpg)

(http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t224/SimplyHuge/25554_764455802539_25828101_4306371.jpg)
big diff between muscle and fat,but i know what you mean, years ago on the mike douglas show there was a fat comedian named steve rossi and he posed down with steve michilak and actually made steve look small. rossi however had about ninety percent fat on his frame.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on March 16, 2010, 12:48:02 PM
I def think Kahn is off the juice in that pic. Kinda kills me everyone wants to see these guys friggin huge year round but if they arent sauced to the max its "I look as big as a pro." I dont think SimplyHuge was comparing his friends build to Kahn by any means and everyone is jumping all over him a little. Pictures dont do pros much justice because you dont see the front to back thickness these guys have. I remember Chris Bennet doing a seminar at my gym and his arms were foooking huge(I know he was a synthol guy just saying). My might have been 17 at the time and it seemed like they were 24. Just crazy in person. PJ Braun too, met him and his arms dint even seem real they were so big. They arent even top-tier BBs either.


sorry buddy, but that does nto make alot of sense.....if your know anything about bodybuildign, or how insecure, narcessistic bodybuilders think

zack khan is not going to go off the juice for his first american supplement company tour.....its just not going to happen

there are alot of variables which could be causing hsi arms to not look as big as they usually do in that photo

distance to the camera, the fact that the kid is standing closer, the fact that that kid has 18% bodyfat, and zack has 9%....all these things come into play

and maybe because zack is on a supplement tour right now, and hasnt hunkered down and started training for a show, he is crusing ont he gear ritght now

be rest assured though, he is not "off"
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: Tombo on March 16, 2010, 01:30:09 PM

Yeah, you are right; I have always felt that my arms are as big as Coleman’s   ;D :P

Cool man we needed the big red text
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: DK II on March 16, 2010, 01:35:58 PM
Cool man we needed the big red text

alnassak tries to distract from the fact that he is a homo, but, as he is a homo, he doesn't realize that big red letters are totally gay.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: TRIX on March 16, 2010, 01:51:05 PM
Your friend is closer to the camera and angled you dumbarse. And heath is owning your friend, and heath isnt known for his peaks, if he did a crab most muscular it would be LOLaful. Your friend has no definition nor mass whatsoever.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: DK II on March 16, 2010, 02:16:28 PM
Your friend is closer to the camera and angled you dumbarse. And heath is owning your friend, and heath isnt known for his peaks, if he did a crab most muscular it would be LOLaful. Your friend has no definition nor mass whatsoever.

LOL

typical "my friend" syndrome, when everyone knows it's himself.  ;D
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: njflex on March 16, 2010, 08:14:36 PM

sorry buddy, but that does nto make alot of sense.....if your know anything about bodybuildign, or how insecure, narcessistic bodybuilders think

zack khan is not going to go off the juice for his first american supplement company tour.....its just not going to happen

there are alot of variables which could be causing hsi arms to not look as big as they usually do in that photo

distance to the camera, the fact that the kid is standing closer, the fact that that kid has 18% bodyfat, and zack has 9%....all these things come into play

and maybe because zack is on a supplement tour right now, and hasnt hunkered down and started training for a show, he is crusing ont he gear ritght now

be rest assured though, he is not "off"
last portion of this post makes sense,zack is on say  half of what he usually uses not training as hard or little and still big and say he did that clean and didn't train bam he would get small proved the effect of just "using"with little or no training and u could maintain ,but clean no,thats saying  a lot if this is true or possible.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: cjk on March 16, 2010, 08:38:07 PM
This poor guy thoght these were candid photo's and did not realize his arms were going to be compared to the pro's are there any leg shot's with Branch?
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: HTexan on March 16, 2010, 09:14:49 PM
yea, pros aren't built is all lighting and tanning tricks. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)



Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: MadeYaMelt on March 16, 2010, 10:09:57 PM
This poor guy thoght these were candid photo's and did not realize his arms were going to be compared to the pro's are there any leg shot's with Branch?

Hi SimplyHuge's "friend."   ;D
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: DK II on March 17, 2010, 03:30:29 AM
yea, pros aren't built is all lighting and tanning tricks. ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)





they're way overrated, if you saw Cutler in real, you would miss him in a supermarket, he is so small. Or Ruhl, for example.
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: TRIX on March 17, 2010, 05:11:20 AM
brb missing a 5'8 120 kgs ripped dude in a supermarket
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: ChristopherA on March 17, 2010, 05:59:19 AM

sorry buddy, but that does nto make alot of sense.....if your know anything about bodybuildign, or how insecure, narcessistic bodybuilders think

zack khan is not going to go off the juice for his first american supplement company tour.....its just not going to happen

there are alot of variables which could be causing hsi arms to not look as big as they usually do in that photo

distance to the camera, the fact that the kid is standing closer, the fact that that kid has 18% bodyfat, and zack has 9%....all these things come into play

and maybe because zack is on a supplement tour right now, and hasnt hunkered down and started training for a show, he is crusing ont he gear ritght now

be rest assured though, he is not "off"
I hear what you're sayin. I should have been more specific when I said "off". With any normal guy that would actually mean coming off but being off for a pro is just bridging between heavy cycles with anavar whinny etc
Title: Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
Post by: HERACLES on March 17, 2010, 06:26:58 AM
your friends arms look like blob arms, no definition..not sure what your point is.