Author Topic: .  (Read 15012 times)

TrueGrit

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15192
  • Big dude...all the way big dude.
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #25 on: March 14, 2010, 05:06:19 PM »
Bigbobs  VS Dexter

O

LITTLE JOHN

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 159
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #26 on: March 14, 2010, 05:11:37 PM »
Dex is off in that pic FACT

lesaucer

  • Guest
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #27 on: March 14, 2010, 05:12:20 PM »
I agree it's mostly angle and also on the bodyfat issue, if normal people dieted down to low bodyfat they would be tiny.

Look at this:





and then this:





 8)

tell me that second pic of coleman is shoped right?

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17201
  • Silence you furry fool!
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #28 on: March 14, 2010, 05:16:34 PM »
The calves probably are  ;)

but here is the article that has more pics (stills actually)

http://www.getbig.com/news/2005-02/062305tonight.htm

James Blunt

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3272
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #29 on: March 14, 2010, 05:26:22 PM »
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.  regardless...the point was that these guys dont look so huge next to a normal person.  they are all short, and by themselves look like monsters...but next to a normal 6' guy, they dont look quite so impressive. 
The guy has no definition a.d they look 17 at the very biggest. That's no knock on the guy it's just a real observation. who are you trying to fool here  ???

Lion666

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1080
  • You gotta bring it to get it!
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #30 on: March 14, 2010, 05:40:29 PM »
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.  regardless...the point was that these guys dont look so huge next to a normal person.  they are all short, and by themselves look like monsters...but next to a normal 6' guy, they dont look quite so impressive

yes they do,,, even more impressive, especially when they are 2-3x as wide as the "normal" guy.  wider you get the shorter you look,,, lanky looks taller.

JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #31 on: March 14, 2010, 05:47:45 PM »
let me guess,,,your friend is
6ft,,
medium size shirt
claims 18inch arms with 30% bodyfat

so you compare to heat and khan who even khan is at 8% bodyfat vs your friends 30% bodyfat that your friends are bigger in comparions,,,khan gets up to 300lbs off season with 12 bodyfat your friend would get dwarf if khan was not dieted down or even heath who is offseason is 280 with true 24inch arms vs those,,,22inches there,,, ::) next post your gonna tell me your friend is not lifting weights,,,look hwo big he is no liftss weights vs heath,,,so small

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #32 on: March 14, 2010, 05:56:38 PM »
Bigbobs  VS Dexter



good find :)

Dex is off in that pic FACT

How can you say that for "fact"  ??? ::)  In actuality that picture was taken one week after the 2007 Olympia, so he was as on as ever, however he was very lean.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #33 on: March 14, 2010, 05:58:45 PM »
As for the topic of the thread, this is pretty dumb.  Not everyone looks their best in every single photo taken.  People only share their own few best photos but expect each pro to look exceptional in each pic that's taken of them.  

Besides, in this example Zack's head looks one-half the size of your friend's which suggests there's a big scaling disadvantage, and not sure wha point the heath pic is making, if anything its contrary to the point you are trying to make.

Reminds me of when Groink and a few others were saying its a "fact" that Nasser now weighs no more than 240 or 250 lbs simply based on how others looked in pictures compared to him lol, then he posted a weigh-scale video disproving this

American Muscle

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 142
  • POW in the WOD
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #34 on: March 14, 2010, 05:59:53 PM »
Wow!! "Simply Huge" and his crew are some big mofos, that's for sure.



























(chuckle)
Fight the Enemy

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #35 on: March 14, 2010, 06:02:24 PM »
Groink has them beat.

JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #36 on: March 14, 2010, 06:05:13 PM »
Groink has them beat.
not compared to simplyhuge friend,,,,

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #37 on: March 14, 2010, 06:15:51 PM »
Don't get your panties in a bunch....your midgets with muscles will still pose for you in their glittering thongs.  it was only an observation that they dont look as impressive next to normal "statured" people.  next to other muscle midgets they look big tho, or by themselves.
Ronnie is about 5'11 and when in shape had legit 24s. Now, Phil's are about 21s or so, but your friend has zero defintion, separation, or thickness. He's not impressive at all. Plus he's wearing a small shirt, and we can see, he has a belly, he has no flatness to it. Your friend is 6 foot and that is it. Nothing to see here. You put Phil's arms on him and then, he'd be impressive.

bigbobs

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9677
  • Islam, Nasser and Corvettes.
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #38 on: March 14, 2010, 06:26:46 PM »
Ronnie is about 5'11 and when in shape had legit 24s. Now, Phil's are about 21s or so, but your friend has zero defintion, separation, or thickness. He's not impressive at all. Plus he's wearing a small shirt, and we can see, he has a belly, he has no flatness to it. Your friend is 6 foot and that is it. Nothing to see here. You put Phil's arms on him and then, he'd be impressive.

I think SimplyHuge was basically expecting that these pros will look like cartoon or fantasy characteristics like the cartoon-version of the Hulk or HeMan dwarfing every human in sight lol.

American Muscle

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 142
  • POW in the WOD
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #39 on: March 14, 2010, 06:32:02 PM »
I think SimplyHuge was basically expecting that these pros will look like cartoon or fantasy characteristics like the cartoon-version of the Hulk or HeMan dwarfing every human in sight lol.

Haha...Maybe "SimplyHuge" is still quite childlike at heart.
Fight the Enemy

balight

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 365
  • East-European gigolo
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #40 on: March 14, 2010, 06:36:35 PM »
I think SimplyHuge was basically expecting that these pros will look like cartoon or fantasy characteristics like the cartoon-version of the Hulk or HeMan dwarfing every human in sight lol.

Because alone they actually do  LOOK like cartoon characters nowdays, so you expect them to be huge next to you. I don't get it why are you all talking smack about SimplyHuge-s friend. No one  said he is impressive/has a good build, SimplyHuge just said he isn't a  midget, has some mass, therefor he could be the a "average weight lifter". And next to him, a pro surprisingly doesn't look so huge. Stop the roidrage guyz.

JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #41 on: March 14, 2010, 07:08:47 PM »
Don't get your panties in a bunch....your midgets with muscles will still pose for you in their glittering thongs.  it was only an observation that they dont look as impressive next to normal "statured" people.  next to other muscle midgets they look big tho, or by themselves.
and yet you talk about these midgets with muscles like you worship them eveyr move,,, ::) hecne why you came to getbig my fiend

Earl1972

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22154
  • #EarlToo
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #42 on: March 14, 2010, 07:16:23 PM »
your friend is getting owned

E
E

geneticmarvel

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 860
  • "You've got size, but you don't have my size!"
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #43 on: March 14, 2010, 07:28:35 PM »
yea, my friends arms arent 14-15 inches dieted down...more like 17-18.  regardless...the point was that these guys dont look so huge next to a normal person.  they are all short, and by themselves look like monsters...but next to a normal 6' guy, they dont look quite so impressive. 

Bodybuilders are small men with freakishly huge muscles. A regular 5'8" 160lb dude will definitely look fucked up if he were to gain 100lbs+ of lean muscle, especially when his puny to begin with head doesnt grow one single bit. Most of the largest bbers from the 90s were inherently big guys ie Nasser, Fux, Ruhl, Gunter, Richards. Nowadays you have inherently small pros attempting to match those size numbers and they end up looking like a foolish cartoon character.

LITTLE JOHN

  • Time Out
  • Getbig II
  • *
  • Posts: 159
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #44 on: March 14, 2010, 07:51:21 PM »
All very good points.

mesmorph78

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10953
  • there can only be one...
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #45 on: March 14, 2010, 08:14:47 PM »
I think there is a very big difference in size ... And as already mentioned these guys are ripped ur friend isn't yet still their arms are a LOT bigger...
choice is an illusion

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #46 on: March 14, 2010, 08:24:14 PM »
simply huge needs a new set of glasses hahahah your 'freind' is getting destroyed lol hahah
L

big ban

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 25
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #47 on: March 14, 2010, 08:27:47 PM »
The main difference is that Zacks arms is 100% muscle while your "buddys" arm is skinny fat.

Its like taking an overweight dude next to a pro bodybuilder and claim that the overweight "owns" the bodybuilder.

True true  :)

Parker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 53475
  • He Sees The Stormy Anger Of The World
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #48 on: March 14, 2010, 08:43:21 PM »
simply huge needs a new set of glasses hahahah your 'freind' is getting destroyed lol hahah
Can you imagine if he stood next to a prime Marko or Ronnie...destroyed ain't the word. And Phil's arms aren't the biggest, he's about 236, so his arm are probably 21.5-22s, but it's the sick detail and tris that make them look huge.

JOCKTHEGLIDE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2573
Re: The Biggest ARMS on the Pros are Small?
« Reply #49 on: March 14, 2010, 08:57:53 PM »
Can you imagine if he stood next to a prime Marko or Ronnie...destroyed ain't the word. And Phil's arms aren't the biggest, he's about 236, so his arm are probably 21.5-22s, but it's the sick detail and tris that make them look huge.
only f you fckin knew,,parker I measured heaths arm before and it is a legit 24 in the off season,,,this is no joke thats off season