Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: donrhummy on September 16, 2010, 10:04:09 PM

Title: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: donrhummy on September 16, 2010, 10:04:09 PM
2001 - 2nd place
2009 - 1st place

What progress!
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: d0nny2600 on September 17, 2010, 02:00:04 AM
2001 - 2nd place
2009 - 1st place

What progress!

His hair got better
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: #1 Klaus fan on September 17, 2010, 04:46:28 AM
Chest got alot smaller.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Figo on September 17, 2010, 04:50:55 AM
Chest got alot smaller.

looks better in gym shot overall
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: spinnis on September 17, 2010, 04:52:26 AM
its called being maxed out and nto wanting to kill himself in the process of growing and ruining himself
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Figo on September 17, 2010, 04:59:40 AM
its called being maxed out and nto wanting to kill himself in the process of growing and ruining himself

makes sense
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Tito24 on September 17, 2010, 05:02:22 AM
(http://i40.tinypic.com/2afn9c0.jpg)
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: DK II on September 17, 2010, 05:03:06 AM
makes sense

No it doesn't.

Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: spinnis on September 17, 2010, 05:12:47 AM
No it doesn't.



yes it does. Im sure jay has tried being heavier, which resulted in a look he didn't like.
So instead of risking his health more then he already is, hes just refining it, Knowing that hes already BIG ENOUGH and now it ONLY comes down to condition.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Figo on September 17, 2010, 05:17:18 AM
No it doesn't.



Why doesn't it?
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Figo on September 17, 2010, 05:19:32 AM
(http://i40.tinypic.com/2afn9c0.jpg)

This pic is circa 94?

back then wouldve thought, bananas, healthy.

now, its a big guy with muscles, wearing daisy duke cut-offs, holding a plate of phalic fruit...
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: affeman on September 17, 2010, 05:37:35 AM
2001 - 2nd place
2009 - 1st place

What progress!

U can't compare gym to stage shots, otherwise DJ would be Mr.O.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Meso_z on September 17, 2010, 05:42:12 AM
(http://i40.tinypic.com/2afn9c0.jpg)
I would grab one. no homo.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: 240 is Back on September 17, 2010, 05:56:25 AM
now, its a big guy with muscles, wearing daisy duke cut-offs, holding a plate of phalic fruit...

getbig has jaded us, bro.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: MAXX on September 17, 2010, 06:09:39 AM
2001 - 2nd place
2009 - 1st place

What progress!
actually looks fuller and tighter in 01
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: spinnis on September 17, 2010, 06:11:28 AM
actually looks fuller and tighter in 01

compare stage photos.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Lundgren on September 17, 2010, 06:18:19 AM
actually looks fuller and tighter in 01
The shadow between pec and bi's, do alot for him. He's shredded but he'd probaly look worst with different lighting
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: _bruce_ on September 17, 2010, 06:24:37 AM
I would grab one. no homo.

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: DK II on September 17, 2010, 06:39:01 AM
yes it does. Im sure jay has tried being heavier, which resulted in a look he didn't like.
So instead of risking his health more then he already is, hes just refining it, Knowing that hes already BIG ENOUGH and now it ONLY comes down to condition.

Because he is smaller in the 2nd pic.

This is 7 years in between, you would think you can see SOME progress in any field, but there isn't.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: spinnis on September 17, 2010, 06:43:47 AM
Because he is smaller in the 2nd pic.

This is 7 years in between, you would think you can see SOME progress in any field, but there isn't.

do you know his weight?

just becuase he looks bigger doesn't mean he is  :)  on the second photo his also pushing his shoulders down a but which makes him look smaller.

compare     stage    photos
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: FREAKgeek on September 17, 2010, 06:48:16 AM
its called being maxed out and nto wanting to kill himself in the process of growing and ruining himself

it's called being past his peak
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: spinnis on September 17, 2010, 06:51:50 AM
it's called being past his peak

pretty much looked his best ever last year in Alot of years =)  everyone looked better when they were alot younger though
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 17, 2010, 07:10:42 AM
U can't compare gym to stage shots, otherwise DJ would be Mr.O.


these people just cannot grasp the concept that a gym photo is completely different then a stage photo


of courser his chest looks bigger in the 2001 gym photo, he probably just got done with a chest and shoulder workout and banged 30 units of insulin and at 200g of pie filling



waitin gback stage and an event to go on, then standing flexing under stagelights is nothing like that,..........you flat


Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: FREAKgeek on September 17, 2010, 08:12:35 AM
Not bad of a physique either way. If it wasn't for Coleman, it would of been a Lee Haney run.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Tito24 on September 17, 2010, 08:13:52 AM
(http://members.iinet.net.au/~lynk/images/camelToe.jpg)
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: FREAKgeek on September 17, 2010, 08:18:34 AM
Does that qualify as clothing? I wish more chicks would do that.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: no one on September 17, 2010, 08:58:48 AM
(http://i44.tinypic.com/2rdc5n4.jpg)

ahahahahahah
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Tito24 on September 17, 2010, 10:05:38 AM
what is nasser doing with the banana?
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Lundgren on September 17, 2010, 10:08:57 AM
what is nasser doing with the banana?
A better question is what's that A-rab doing bathing? :o
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Tito24 on September 17, 2010, 10:11:29 AM
(http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/6798/wtf0ng.jpg)
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Nails on September 17, 2010, 10:22:40 AM
I think the progress was Ronnie colman got smaller and older
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Tito24 on September 17, 2010, 10:26:38 AM
i wish i were that small
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: jaejonna on September 17, 2010, 10:28:43 AM
 ???
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Tito24 on September 17, 2010, 10:30:33 AM
(http://www.markus-ruehl.de/uploads/pics/arnolds07_3807.jpg)

(http://i42.tinypic.com/152fade.jpg)
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 17, 2010, 12:14:46 PM
(http://www.markus-ruehl.de/uploads/pics/arnolds07_3807.jpg)



im in love with Simone, i want her to be my giorlfriend
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: FREAKgeek on September 17, 2010, 03:16:12 PM
Simone doesn't care if you fart all the time.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: BayGBM on September 17, 2010, 03:23:46 PM
bodybuilder photos are so fucking random at times,

1 million bananas and tiny ass jeans shorts? the fuck?  ;D

They are called "daisy dukes."  ;D

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=209016.msg2888214#msg2888214
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Evo on September 18, 2010, 09:40:04 AM

these people just cannot grasp the concept that a gym photo is completely different then a stage photo


of courser his chest looks bigger in the 2001 gym photo, he probably just got done with a chest and shoulder workout and banged 30 units of insulin and at 200g of pie filling



waitin gback stage and an event to go on, then standing flexing under stagelights is nothing like that,..........you flat




Exactly this!

Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Mr Nobody on September 18, 2010, 05:27:43 PM
 ;)
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: mass 04 on September 18, 2010, 05:36:51 PM
I(no homo) think that the 2001 pic (no homo) was taken(no homo) the day after the Olympia (no homo).So, he (no homo) is fuller (no homo) and bigger (no homo). The stage (no homo) lighting does no favors (no homo)


(no homo)
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: DK II on September 18, 2010, 06:00:20 PM
I(no homo) think that the 2001 pic (no homo) was taken(no homo) the day after the Olympia (no homo).So, he (no homo) is fuller (no homo) and bigger (no homo). The stage (no homo) lighting does no favors (no homo)


(no homo)

I grasp a very light homosexual content in your post, but i just cannot grab it...  :-\
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: donrhummy on September 27, 2010, 08:55:55 AM
He was still better 9 years ago. (And you'll notice I made his head a little bigger in 2010 and yet he's still more muscular in 2001)

To view full size, right click the image and choose "view image"
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: musclecenter on September 27, 2010, 10:27:12 AM
he should retire.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: dantelis on September 27, 2010, 04:13:40 PM
2001 - 2nd place
2009 - 1st place

What progress!

Amazing difference.  The 2001 Jay would deserve 1st place in 2010 with no questions. 
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: OneMoreRep on September 27, 2010, 04:17:13 PM
(http://i40.tinypic.com/2afn9c0.jpg)

Did anyone notice the hard on he is sporting within those daisy dukes?

"1"
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Matt C on September 27, 2010, 10:06:04 PM
His hair got better

Is good hair like that of Peter North mainly genetic?  I figured it was just a matter of asking your barber to do it but I haven't done that yet so wouldn't know.  I would die for Peter North's hair.  It's honestly amazing.

(http://members.iinet.net.au/~lynk/images/camelToe.jpg)

LOL!!!  Where do you get these?
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Immortal_Technique on September 28, 2010, 04:43:23 AM
he should retire.

You know he's no.1 in the world right? Do you have mental aids?
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 Progress
Post by: Meso_z on September 28, 2010, 05:15:42 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=348613.0;attach=384640;image)

He had better tanning in 2009 than 2010 mr olympia....even better than both at 2001.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 28, 2010, 05:31:34 AM
He was still better 9 years ago. (And you'll notice I made his head a little bigger in 2010 and yet he's still more muscular in 2001)

To view full size, right click the image and choose "view image"



idiot............for the 100th millionth time


you cannot compare post-workout pump photos ..............TO STAGE SHOTS






the "pump" you have after doing a chest and shoulder workout...particularly a pro bodybuilder, who probably just injected 20 units of humalog and drank a carbo force




is nothing like standing around  in posing trunks for a couple of hours backstage waiting to go on the standing for 15 minutes under lights in a cold room......then being shuffeled around, sent backstage for an hour.........then back out

you flatten out,





thats why those pictures you see of bodybuilders in magazines, with the sick bulging veins crazy pump...........is NEVER replicated on stage, the conditions are different





no bodybuilder looks they do in gym photos on stage

take for example, the most famous "gym-pump-pic-mr. olympia" dennis james.......have you EVER saw dennis james look on stage like he does in this photo?? ::) ::)

(http://woodenspears.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/david_henry1.jpg)
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a282/deetrakt/BZZ/DnnsJames.jpg)

NO, if he did , he would have been a multiple time mr O
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 Progress
Post by: hench on September 28, 2010, 06:24:31 AM
looks like his waist got wider, delts smaller, shoulders narrower
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Matt C on September 28, 2010, 12:21:18 PM
This pic is circa 94?

back then wouldve thought, bananas, healthy.

now, its a big guy with muscles, wearing daisy duke cut-offs, holding a plate of phalic fruit...

It's interesting how reality changes perception.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: brent2741 on September 28, 2010, 12:27:55 PM
looks better in gym shot overall
most people do
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: Palpatine Q on September 28, 2010, 12:29:26 PM


idiot............for the 100th millionth time


you cannot compare post-workout pump photos ..............TO STAGE SHOTS






the "pump" you have after doing a chest and shoulder workout...particularly a pro bodybuilder, who probably just injected 20 units of humalog and drank a carbo force




is nothing like standing around  in posing trunks for a couple of hours backstage waiting to go on the standing for 15 minutes under lights in a cold room......then being shuffeled around, sent backstage for an hour.........then back out

you flatten out,





thats why those pictures you see of bodybuilders in magazines, with the sick bulging veins crazy pump...........is NEVER replicated on stage, the conditions are different





no bodybuilder looks they do in gym photos on stage

take for example, the most famous "gym-pump-pic-mr. olympia" dennis james.......have you EVER saw dennis james look on stage like he does in this photo?? ::) ::)

(http://woodenspears.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/david_henry1.jpg)
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a282/deetrakt/BZZ/DnnsJames.jpg)

NO, if he did , he would have been a multiple time mr O

Since when have you become an authority on.....well, everything.... apparently
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: donrhummy on September 28, 2010, 12:47:39 PM


idiot............for the 100th millionth time

Well, since you asked so nicely...
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: hench on September 28, 2010, 03:18:00 PM
from these you can see the forearms are smaller, bi's are smaller as are the calves, thighs dont look as dense
Well, since you asked so nicely...
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: affeman on September 28, 2010, 03:33:09 PM
He really was better in 2001, way better. And even last year. Everyone who says this year he was just as good as last year is out of his mind.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: Deicide on September 28, 2010, 03:39:13 PM
In 2001 his pecs were way thicker! What the hell happened?! ???
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: G_Thang on September 28, 2010, 03:48:07 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=348613.0;attach=384825;image)

jay has the coolest crib vids and is money earning but he is winning O titles with leg cuts.  what happen to mr o and the GREAT back ala yates, haney and ronnie?  dex's yr dont matter.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: Lion666 on September 28, 2010, 09:16:01 PM
2001 - 2nd place
2009 - 1st place

What progress!

2001 jay = cool build
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 28, 2010, 09:29:32 PM
Well, since you asked so nicely...

lol ;)
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: dyslexic on September 28, 2010, 09:31:08 PM
Lighting is everything...


more than most here will ever begin to fathom.
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 28, 2010, 09:49:18 PM
Since when have you become an authority on.....well, everything.... apparently


authority..........??


thats whats knows as "common knowledge"



like if i said that the earth is the third planet from our sun, or that there are 12 months in the Gregorian calander.........what i said was the bodybuilding equivalent if this kind of simple information
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: _bruce_ on September 28, 2010, 11:46:32 PM
Shocking how his arms shrunk.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 28, 2010, 11:51:29 PM
Shocking how his arms shrunk.



where do you see his arms shrunk exactly?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=348613.0;attach=384820;image)
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: Wee Laddy on September 28, 2010, 11:57:19 PM
The photo of 2010 is misleading.  The lighting is darker and his shadows blend into the background.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: ~UN_$ung~ on September 29, 2010, 12:06:51 AM
The photo of 2010 is misleading.  The lighting is darker and his shadows blend into the background.


good work, that puts it into a good perspective
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: phyxsius on September 29, 2010, 12:27:02 AM
Jay got bigger but less cuts
Title: Re: Progress in the IFBB
Post by: The Ugly on September 29, 2010, 05:33:58 AM
Well, since you asked so nicely...

So much for muscle maturity.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: donrhummy on September 29, 2010, 02:24:14 PM
The photo of 2010 is misleading.  The lighting is darker and his shadows blend into the background.


Three things:

1. Look at his left hand, the 2010 is slightly too large (assuming you didn't alter the images other than birghtness/contrast, that's my fault, I guess i made the 2010 too big)

2. I notice you lifted the 2010 picture up! The bottom shows his knees are too high as well as his head! This makes him appear bigger.

3. The reason the lighting is that way is I put completely untouched photos together. You altered them.
Title: Re: Jay Cutler - 2001 vs. 2009 vs 2010 Progress (2001 vs 2010 on page 3)
Post by: donrhummy on September 29, 2010, 02:32:50 PM
Here's a more accurate gif using your image but not lifted up higher. You can see the accuracy if you look at the inner tricep of his right arm (on the left side of the pic) where it matches perfectly in towards his pec between the two pics.