Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: gh15 on October 23, 2011, 01:12:22 PM

Title: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 23, 2011, 01:12:22 PM
i was asked what a trenbolona addict look like that has BAD GENETIC RESPOND TO HORMONES ,, the repetetive question which i answer in the past by the way but i will answer it again ,, a bad genetic rspond to hormone will usualy look like retard,, or slow fella that has flat muscle no matter what and the muscle doesnt want to grow ...a good example of it is the following picture ,, it is indeed a bodybuild but! only! because addict to trenbolona ace! trenbolona ace allow the worst of the worst to become bodybuild...this is how superior this drug is ,,

here it is ,,this is a fella on trenbolona ace addiction that was not meant to be bodybuild,, sub average everything ,, but trenbolona keep him going

gh15 approved

Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: The_Iron_Disciple on October 23, 2011, 01:31:04 PM
God is right, fellas. Tren really is a superior drug. I didn't believe it until now. I don't think i'll ever come off. Not if I can help it, anyways.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Fitness4Life on October 23, 2011, 01:55:09 PM
God is right, fellas. Tren really is a superior drug. I didn't believe it until now. I don't think i'll ever come off. Not if I can help it, anyways.
[/quote

details!  how long you been on?  dose?  the results?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: _bruce_ on October 23, 2011, 01:57:46 PM
Hahaha - the Hari son douche getting what he deserves.
An attention whore to the nth degree.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: pellius on October 23, 2011, 09:39:22 PM
i was asked what a trenbolona addict look like that has BAD GENETIC RESPOND TO HORMONES ,, the repetetive question which i answer in the past by the way but i will answer it again ,, a bad genetic rspond to hormone will usualy look like retard,, or slow fella that has flat muscle no matter what and the muscle doesnt want to grow ...a good example of it is the following picture ,, it is indeed a bodybuild but! only! because addict to trenbolona ace! trenbolona ace allow the worst of the worst to become bodybuild...this is how superior this drug is ,,

here it is ,,this is a fella on trenbolona ace addiction that was not meant to be bodybuild,, sub average everything ,, but trenbolona keep him going

gh15 approved


Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: WillGrant on October 23, 2011, 09:44:16 PM
Lyin Herris

Dispatched the fuck outa here

<---------------------


(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=399947.0;attach=437647;image)
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dyslexic on October 23, 2011, 09:44:22 PM
I almost thought this was gonna be about Kevin English...


But then he looks more like an angry Mongoloid...
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: whitewidow on October 23, 2011, 09:55:07 PM
God is right, fellas. Tren really is a superior drug. I didn't believe it until now. I don't think i'll ever come off. Not if I can help it, anyways.

Tren is a very superior drug but i dont give a shit what Gh15 says nobody can stay on Tren for years! Tren is very toxic stuff! Now test and other anabolics you can stay on year round but not Tren! unless you want to eventually have some liver problems. best to cycle tren. not to stay on it all year! I have heard him say people stay on tren all year but that is not true only if your crazy and you guyd know I am crazy and I dont even use tren for more than 12 weeks out of a year, then recover so I can use it the following year. Unless your getting paid and are a highly ranked bodybuilder no reason to abuse trenbolone. very harsh stuff!Even if your prepping for a show 12 weeks of Tren usage is all you need as long as your using other anabolics and HGH/insulin.I am sure many of you have a diffrent opinion but Tren is nothing to play around with!
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 23, 2011, 09:58:59 PM
Tren is a very superior drug but i dont give a shit what Gh15 says nobody can stay on Tren for years! Tren is very toxic stuff! Now test and other anabolics you can stay on year round but not Tren! unless you want to eventually have some liver problems. best to cycle tren. not to stay on it all year! I have heard him say people stay on tren all year but that is not true only if your crazy and you guyd know I am crazy and I dont even use tren for more than 12 weeks out of a year, then recover so I can use it the following year. Unless your getting paid and are a highly ranked bodybuilder no reason to abuse trenbolone. very harsh stuff!Even if your prepping for a show 12 weeks of Tren usage is all you need as long as your using other anabolics and HGH/insulin.I am sure many of you have a diffrent opinion but Tren is nothing to play around with!

friend,, you are not  abodybuilder! this is the problem,, you are 180 5'8 or whatever it is ,, that is why you are there lol  ,,why do you think i would say something just for the saying ,, i say things i did and do ,, i did it all along my career,, we rarely go off trenbolona ace and when we do we lose condition very fast,,  the other anabolics dont count as much as trenbolona,, testosterona is a bloofy drug that need much gh to go with inorder to utilize to the utmost level,,

you need to understand that what i say is not up for argument,, it is the facts!

there is 2 options...to stay and play 180 wanna be 5'9 all your life...

or to be a bodybuiuld and do what it takes,, and by bodybuild i mean 200+ 6% on a regular basis

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 23, 2011, 10:06:49 PM
actualy this is wrong what i said there,, 5'8 180 is a bodybuild,, it is just not a larger more conditioned bodybuilder due to lack of specific products in high enough doses and duration ...

5'8 180 5'6 170 5'10 185 all bodybuilders,, it is just that they lack the consistancy with specific products for long term usage

gh15 approved

Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Swlabr on October 28, 2011, 03:57:27 PM
God, does tren cause cramps?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: farrellzach on October 28, 2011, 04:17:00 PM
God, does tren cause cramps?

Definitely could due to dehydration. Pump the water.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Swlabr on October 28, 2011, 04:20:57 PM
Definitely could due to dehydration. Pump the water.

I'm having really bad cramps in both my quads right now (trained them today). I also had weed and mushrooms a few hours ago, so it could be that. You reckon water'll do the trick?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: no one on October 28, 2011, 05:23:03 PM
Tren is a very superior drug but i dont give a shit what Gh15 says nobody can stay on Tren for years! Tren is very toxic stuff! Now test and other anabolics you can stay on year round but not Tren! unless you want to eventually have some liver problems. best to cycle tren. not to stay on it all year! I have heard him say people stay on tren all year but that is not true only if your crazy and you guyd know I am crazy and I dont even use tren for more than 12 weeks out of a year, then recover so I can use it the following year. Unless your getting paid and are a highly ranked bodybuilder no reason to abuse trenbolone. very harsh stuff!Even if your prepping for a show 12 weeks of Tren usage is all you need as long as your using other anabolics and HGH/insulin.I am sure many of you have a diffrent opinion but Tren is nothing to play around with!

typical internet repeat what you read other idiots like yourself regurgitating to look smart without any proof to back up your claims.

have you ever had your bloodwork done after a course of t-ace? no, you havent, have you? of course you havent. cause if you had you'd realise the majority of your post is utter bullshit.

i have. after 26 weeks of ace. at dosages ranging from300mg a week as high as 500mg. plus other compounds such as NPP, oral winstrol and anavar.

kidney function- normal. thyroid function- normal. PSA's- normal- and there is a history of prostate cancer in my family. BP bang on. no diabetes.  etc etc

the only thing was my liver enzyme elevations were 4 times higher than normal. 6 weeks after cessation of the winny and var they were baseline.

so kindly fuck off with your broscience, until you have cold hard facts backing your shit up. im tired of guys like you repeating what you hear, and not knowing fuck all in reality.

some guys can run A LOT of certain compunds and not have it affect them. others can look at a bottle of test and get gyno. it depends on your tolerance to such compounds. the guys who are usually the biggest and in best shape have the best tolerance. end of story.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: da_vinci on October 28, 2011, 05:30:31 PM
I'm currently witnessing someone who's (IMHO) not suited to be a bodybuilder (all signs of low test/higher est kinf of body structure, facial features, etc.. well you can tell one when you see one) that has just got on tren (and prop). Dude thought he'll stay on 300mg/wk for three months and it will be enough. I convinced him to up the dose and go at least 4-5months str8 lol.. I'm really eager to see whether he'll achieve at least some "pop" to his physique after it, as he honestly looks like a complete shit currently (skinny-semifat with an unfavourable structure). That is if the gear is legit of course.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: tlc on October 28, 2011, 05:32:26 PM
Don't forget whitewidow's amazing MMA stack advice - trenbolone! Clearly he's never used the stuff.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: apply85 on October 28, 2011, 05:37:55 PM
no one, did u up dosage of mast in order to deal with both npp and tren at the same time? Do u use mast? Maybe I should send this in pm
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Palpatine Q on October 28, 2011, 05:38:06 PM
typical internet repeat what you read other idiots like yourself regurgitating to look smart without any proof to back up your claims.

have you ever had your bloodwork done after a course of t-ace? no, you havent, have you? of course you havent. cause if you had you'd realise the majority of your post is utter bullshit.

i have. after 26 weeks of ace. at dosages ranging from300mg a week as high as 500mg. plus other compounds such as NPP, oral winstrol and anavar.

kidney function- normal. thyroid function- normal. PSA's- normal- and there is a history of prostate cancer in my family. BP bang on. no diabetes.  etc etc

the only thing was my liver enzyme elevations were 4 times higher than normal. 6 weeks after cessation of the winny and var they were baseline.

so kindly fuck off with your broscience, until you have cold hard facts backing your shit up. im tired of guys like you repeating what you hear, and not knowing fuck all in reality.

some guys can run A LOT of certain compunds and not have it affect them. others can look at a bottle of test and get gyno. it depends on your tolerance to such compounds. the guys who are usually the biggest and in best shape have the best tolerance. end of story.

QFT....I've been running tren for three months now 250 mg a week...was at the doctor TODAY....EVERYTHING A-OK......BP 112/60.....
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Hulkotron on October 28, 2011, 05:40:37 PM
I almost thought this was gonna be about Kevin English...


But then he looks more like an angry Mongoloid...

Are you nuts?  Kevin English is a freaky beast.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 28, 2011, 06:47:24 PM
I know someone who claims to have been on tren for over 15 years straight and he gets routine blood work. He's a past Mr. Canada and has had an IFBB pro card as well. He's just fine and thinks the whole craze about tren being "dangerous" and "not for beginners" is bullshit.

Tren toxicity is overblown. Yes, tren gives you cloudy piss and that's about it. Someone tried stringing together a mish mash of "facts" together to paint a picture about tren. All bro science. Beginners or people who only wish to cycle should DEFINITELY use tren and avoid the classic 500mg of test for 8 weeks type cycles. Make the most of your time while you're on and transform as much as possible to raise your natural physique once you come off. I think coming off is a waste of time, but I don't think doing tren for a first cycle is. Tren is amazing.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: da_vinci on October 28, 2011, 07:04:16 PM
I know someone who claims to have been on tren for over 15 years straight and he gets routine blood work. He's a past Mr. Canada and has had an IFBB pro card as well. He's just fine and thinks the whole craze about tren being "dangerous" and "not for beginners" is bullshit.

Tren toxicity is overblown. Yes, tren gives you cloudy piss and that's about it. Someone tried stringing together a mish mash of "facts" together to paint a picture about tren. All bro science. Beginners or people who only wish to cycle should DEFINITELY use tren and avoid the classic 500mg of test for 8 weeks type cycles. Make the most of your time while you're on and transform as much as possible to raise your natural physique once you come off. I think coming off is a waste of time, but I don't think doing tren for a first cycle is. Tren is amazing.

lol.. good post.

BTW - is that fella in a constant "tren condition" (and does he look good generally?).
 I know someone who hasn't been  "off" (not tren, but.. well.. everything..depending on the period) for about 20years (off in his case is usualy - two tro three months a year..) - all dandy, healthy and going strong (looking 10times better then other guys his age).
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 28, 2011, 07:21:43 PM
lol.. good post.

BTW - is that fella in a constant "tren condition" (and does he look good generally?).
 I know someone who hasn't been  "off" (not tren, but.. well.. everything..depending on the period) for about 20years (off in his case is usualy - two tro three months a year..) - all dandy, healthy and going strong (looking 10times better then other guys his age).

Yep, he's in great condition. I think he's just crack the 50's and unfortunately tore a few body parts, so he's doing a bit rough. He's spent the better part of 20 years power lifting though and confides that he's done stupid things too. He's a fucking smart cookie, man. Between him dispelling the gym folk lore and gh15 on this board, I feel blessed.

He's never been a tren abuser either. I think he uses 150mg EOD (possibly ED) and a bit of test. Everything else is too expensive and not really worth it. All Canadian UGL stuff too and I know his supplier and have seen him pick up his gear, so I know he's being honest about his usage too. He's already got all the mass he needs, so there's no reason to take grams and grams. He just takes enough to maintain with his age and pretty beat up body.


As far as blood work is concerned, he's shown me print outs. It's fine, just as one would expect if they weren't a fucking internet know-it-all. I don't proclaim to know a ton of anything, I just listen to what people say, read as much as I can and formulate my own opinions based on logic and not believing in magical bodybuilding fairy tales. ;)
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Hulkotron on October 28, 2011, 07:23:32 PM
What are everyone's thoughts on the creatine loading phase?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 28, 2011, 08:12:36 PM
What are everyone's thoughts on the creatine loading phase?

Be careful and make sure you've done a lot of soul searching beforehand.

It's probably best to have some Plazmosis on standby as well. Stay safe, brother!
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: LittleJ on October 28, 2011, 08:46:57 PM
So is WW wrong? I thought he had experienced with aas?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 28, 2011, 09:03:08 PM
So is WW wrong? I thought he had experienced with aas?

WW is a good fella but argues with gh15. I stay out of those squabbles. I think WW is knowledgeable but has fallen victim to the internet folklore regarding AAS and other PEDs.

I disagree with how he places trenbologna and insulina on a mythical pedestal. He seems to have the same mindset that beginners should do a cycle of test at 500mg per week for a couple months followed by Nolvadex for PCT. That kind of mindset. I think I've also seen him recommend that people don't use insulin, but for the wrong reasons.

It is a common pitfall that a lot of people fall victim to. I used to say the same thing back when I started as well, but I woke up and snapped out of it. I think anyone should use tren, including beginners. And insulin isn't a magical PED that ONLY pros should use. Anyone with half a brain that can find a way to incorporate insulin should use it. As long as people use safe, moderate doses and use their head then virtually nothing should be "off limits". Why should a beginner not do an effective cycle? So they can "learn" how to use test properly and go from there? Who cares!? Everyone has their own goals, different PEDs, different quality of PEDs and very different life circumstances.


I think people should learn about everything and use whatever is available, the safest and most effective PED. Formulate your own conclusions and STOP, for the love of fucking crumbcake, STOP STOP STOP following cookie cutter cycles!!!! Life is a jigsaw puzzle, yes. But it doesn't mean you try taking other people's puzzle pieces and fitting them into YOUR circumstances. Use your fucking noggins, fellas.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 28, 2011, 09:17:28 PM
WW is a good fella but argues with gh15. I stay out of those squabbles. I think WW is knowledgeable but has fallen victim to the internet folklore regarding AAS and other PEDs.

I disagree with how he places trenbologna and insulina on a mythical pedestal. He seems to have the same mindset that beginners should do a cycle of test at 500mg per week for a couple months followed by Nolvadex for PCT. That kind of mindset. I think I've also seen him recommend that people don't use insulin, but for the wrong reasons.

It is a common pitfall that a lot of people fall victim to. I used to say the same thing back when I started as well, but I woke up and snapped out of it. I think anyone should use tren, including beginners. And insulin isn't a magical PED that ONLY pros should use. Anyone with half a brain that can find a way to incorporate insulin should use it. As long as people use safe, moderate doses and use their head then virtually nothing should be "off limits". Why should a beginner not do an effective cycle? So they can "learn" how to use test properly and go from there? Who cares!? Everyone has their own goals, different PEDs, different quality of PEDs and very different life circumstances.


I think people should learn about everything and use whatever is available, the safest and most effective PED. Formulate your own conclusions and STOP, for the love of fucking crumbcake, STOP STOP STOP following cookie cutter cycles!!!! Life is a jigsaw puzzle, yes. But it doesn't mean you try taking other people's puzzle pieces and fitting them into YOUR circumstances. Use your fucking noggins, fellas.


^ see this posting,, THIS IS WHAT A MODERATOR ON STEROID BOARDING SHOUDL BE LIKE!,, this is real hands on vast experience,, this is what the top boardings should have as moderator! right here this posting ,, a moderator is quite important posittion ,, it is ,, eventhough you dont get much out of it in a none sell boardings...still! a moderator should be the prime cream of the crop,, this fella is cream of the crop,, he has knowledge falling out of his ears like gold coins,, THIS IS WHAT MODERATOR SHOULD BE LIKE

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: no one on October 29, 2011, 12:05:06 AM
no one, did u up dosage of mast in order to deal with both npp and tren at the same time? Do u use mast? Maybe I should send this in pm

when i use npp and tren ace together i dont (read: cant- and ive tried) go over 3-400mg a wk of each compound. i have a great tolerance for anabolics, which is good and bad- i dont get the sides, but i need a lot to grow. anyway running those dosages i found i didnt need the masteron. once you tried running npp and tren together you'll see why i kept it where i did. they're fucking tough on your mental state esp run together. and the hairline. esp npp. i dunno what it is with npp but it makes me shed like crazy, even on 1mg of finesteride ed. i was on 800mg of npp a week. i was loving life. i wasnt loving what it was doing to my hairline.

im not a big fan of masteron- its one of those compounds that i can take or leave and ive used it enough to know if i like it or not. everyones body has an affinity for certain compounds it seems- ever notice how some guys respond to some compounds better than others? for me its anavar, tren, dbol and npp . those compounds my body soaks up. tests of any ester, mastron and i've never had a lot of success with long estered deca my body is like 'meh'.

that last course of winny/var/tren/npp/prop i started to get a little prolactin induced soreness. a little caber and some arimidex took care of it in less than 2 weeks. the key to that run is already being lean when you do it. the leaner the better.

hope this answers your question. its a little fractured. i guess what im saying is this game is a life long pursuit of your own level or idea of perfection. for me its always been a marathon, not a sprint. if you want a quality physique take the time to build it. part of all that is discovering what works best for you- chemically, nutrition wise, training wise. what works well for me wont necessarily yield you the same results. once you find that combination, thats when you'll really start to love to train. every time you step in the gym you leave knowing your going to grow. its a very satisfying feeling. it just takes a while to get there. you can boatload everything and get there too, but i think most experienced guys would agree that theres just something about your bodies ability to take in the compounds your injesting and utilise them efficiently and quality of the physique that comes from it that seems to make a much better built body than just throwing everything and the kitchen sink at it.

Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: indie-lad on October 29, 2011, 12:36:22 AM
Just so I'm correct buying the right steroid. Is "Trenbolone acetate - Trenabolic" the same as trenbolona ace?

I just want to be sure.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh2 on October 29, 2011, 02:08:25 AM
"Trenbolone" is the active ingredient and "acetate" is the ester (a short ester in this case). "Trenabolic" is just the name the UG lab has chosen to put on the product. Trenbolone Acetate = trenbolona ace.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: nosleep on October 29, 2011, 03:07:15 AM
"Trenbolone" is the active ingredient and "acetate" is the ester (a short ester in this case). "Trenabolic" is just the name the UG lab has chosen to put on the product. Trenbolone Acetate = trenbolona ace.


THIS

BUT SERIOUSLY BROS, THE MAIN THING THESE NEW ELFS NEED TO ADDRESS IS THE APPROVED/SCAMMED SOURCES.WHAT GOOD IS IT TO RUN A GRAM OF GEAR A WEEK, AND IT REALLY BE HALF GRAM? THE USER WOULD SAY POOR RESPONSE, BUT IN REALITY ITS POOR GEAR. GH15 NEEDS TO CRACK DOWN EVEN HARDER.LUCKILY THERES ENOUGH APPROVED SOURCES TO GO AROUND FOR NOW BUT THE SCAMMED ONES NEED TO GO.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Van_Bilderass on October 29, 2011, 03:43:44 AM

^ see this posting,, THIS IS WHAT A MODERATOR ON STEROID BOARDING SHOUDL BE LIKE!,, this is real hands on vast experience,, this is what the top boardings should have as moderator! right here this posting ,, a moderator is quite important posittion ,, it is ,, eventhough you dont get much out of it in a none sell boardings...still! a moderator should be the prime cream of the crop,, this fella is cream of the crop,, he has knowledge falling out of his ears like gold coins,, THIS IS WHAT MODERATOR SHOULD BE LIKE

gh15 approved

I agree, Dustin very very smart. He did mod Llewellyn's board so Bill must have recognized this too.

I've been saying this exact thing to guys, use your own brain.

Quote
Formulate your own conclusions and STOP, for the love of fucking crumbcake, STOP STOP STOP following cookie cutter cycles!!!! Life is a jigsaw puzzle, yes. But it doesn't mean you try taking other people's puzzle pieces and fitting them into YOUR circumstances. Use your fucking noggins, fellas.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 29, 2011, 03:56:49 AM

THIS

BUT SERIOUSLY BROS, THE MAIN THING THESE NEW ELFS NEED TO ADDRESS IS THE APPROVED/SCAMMED SOURCES.WHAT GOOD IS IT TO RUN A GRAM OF GEAR A WEEK, AND IT REALLY BE HALF GRAM? THE USER WOULD SAY POOR RESPONSE, BUT IN REALITY ITS POOR GEAR. GH15 NEEDS TO CRACK DOWN EVEN HARDER.LUCKILY THERES ENOUGH APPROVED SOURCES TO GO AROUND FOR NOW BUT THE SCAMMED ONES NEED TO GO.

oh they will ,, i jsut give them few days to get used to be elf,, they will be bombarded with source action,, they will be very important factors in bodybuilder sucess,, ofcourse they wil be honest as it can be becauee they were chosen due to this quality to begin with they demonstarted it for years

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: deceiver on October 29, 2011, 04:33:44 AM
Wow, it's amazing you guys have normal bp on tren. Most of my friends suffered from every possible side there is including insane bp, insane acne (my friend who competed last week had acne even on his damn forearms), fucking everything from tren. He run 80mg eod and it blew him (he didn't look that good ad the day of competition though for some reason).

I have skyhigh bp from 500mg of test without an ai. I get bloated like hell and bp goes through the roof.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 29, 2011, 05:03:27 AM
its because half of them of not most of them use hormone made by stngo which is an artist,, rememebr....the chef matter as much as the product,, if you do balonie from pellets and make it in filth way and over dose by a lot and really dont know what you are doing ....yes blood pressure and other zits and balonie can happen ,, quality matter,, also! the blood pressure with trenbolona ace usualyu happen at night for few hours ...then get back to normal ranges,, body always want to stabilize itself,, your body will have slight peaks of blood pressure while at rest..wth trenbolona ace the high blood presssure if you have it wil happen at night for couple hours then back to normal ,, many dont have any problem with blood pressure ,, it really si individual dependent and also other products depenednt


you do anadrola and trenbolona together high dose...you will have high blood pressure for the time you do them together high dose...trenbolona by itself...your body will find omeostasis pretty fast

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Sentenza on October 29, 2011, 07:13:37 AM
i dunno what it is with npp but it makes me shed like crazy, even on 1mg of finesteride ed.

Some people think you shouldn't use Finasteride with Nandrolones.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: apply85 on October 29, 2011, 07:32:58 AM
Thanks no one, that was a pretty informative post. I have heard that masterone really helps with the mental aspect of both nandrolone and tren
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: no one on October 29, 2011, 07:44:00 AM
Some people think you shouldn't use Finasteride with Nandrolones.


yeah, the jury is kinda out on whether or not the deca/test finestride combo is hard on the hairline. deca/ finesteride is a big no no, and truthfully it my own damn fault for leaving the finesteride in when i jumped from the run that i saw i was shedding in (fucking winnie) into the one i started using heavier doses of npp as i dont suffer from MBP, or have shedding as a result from using testosterone esters. in fact both sides of the finesteride and tren or npp argument have merit. i think you just have to give it a go sometimes and see what happens. i know myself i wasnt happy with the results and wont use them together again.

now that im thinking about it, i started taking the finesteride when i was running heavy tren/winnie doses and never stopped. now that im just running a little test i can take it back out. thanks for the reminder sir. :)
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: no one on October 29, 2011, 07:56:37 AM
Thanks no one, that was a pretty informative post. I have heard that masterone really helps with the mental aspect of both nandrolone and tren

no problem dude.

yeah-something about npp really affects me mentally. the same kind of effect i get from tren mentally. a grumpiness kinda. kinda like a 'meh' and 'blah' state all the time. basically unhappiness is what you could call it for lack of a better word.

using both together was /is much for me. in fact i just stopped the npp not because of any kind of shedding i was seeing, as i think a lot of it is really in my head- my girl says my hair is fine- but because i cant handle the npp nentally.

i LOVE tren ace, but i think those days might be behind me too. i just cant handle it upstairs. i hate being not happy :) if i can achieve the build i want without it, i wont use it again. ive been to the mountain and back in terms of size. now its about the quality of physique im after- the fullness and roundness of the muscle- quality size. think dennis newman in his prime. tight waist, nice quad sweep, and big full round muscle. guess its time to up the gh, and see if just a little test/eq will do the trick- i got the base just want the fullness to go with it.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: almard on October 29, 2011, 08:01:36 AM


How do you avoid the libod, sex drive problem....I don't have Bp problem with tren but it almost kill my sex drive..

Do you think If I add mastron will ge good I dea to prevent that
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: no one on October 29, 2011, 08:15:16 AM

How do you avoid the libod, sex drive problem....I don't have Bp problem with tren but it almost kill my sex drive..

Do you think If I add mastron will ge good I dea to prevent that

i know for me and a lot of other guys tren turns you into a porn star. like. fucking. ridiculous.

iv'e often wondered when i read things like tren affecting some guys adversely if they really had good tren at all, or if it really does affect some differently than others.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: farrellzach on October 29, 2011, 11:25:35 AM
i know for me and a lot of other guys tren turns you into a porn star. like. fucking. ridiculous.

iv'e often wondered when i read things like tren affecting some guys adversely if they really had good tren at all, or if it really does affect some differently than others.

No doubt, tren is like permanent cialis for me
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: deceiver on October 29, 2011, 01:30:55 PM
its because half of them of not most of them use hormone made by stngo which is an artist,, rememebr....the chef matter as much as the product,, if you do balonie from pellets and make it in filth way and over dose by a lot and really dont know what you are doing ....yes blood pressure and other zits and balonie can happen ,, quality matter,, also! the blood pressure with trenbolona ace usualyu happen at night for few hours ...then get back to normal ranges,, body always want to stabilize itself,, your body will have slight peaks of blood pressure while at rest..wth trenbolona ace the high blood presssure if you have it wil happen at night for couple hours then back to normal ,, many dont have any problem with blood pressure ,, it really si individual dependent and also other products depenednt


you do anadrola and trenbolona together high dose...you will have high blood pressure for the time you do them together high dose...trenbolona by itself...your body will find omeostasis pretty fast

gh15 approved

It has nothing to do with purity. I know guy who's got 180/100 bp on 500mg of test and 30mg of dianabol. Everything made by Jelfa, it's Poland.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Swlabr on October 29, 2011, 02:15:25 PM
God, I've injected trenbolona acetate twice now (from Nordic) and I haven't had the infamous tren cough yet. Have I been lucky or...? ???
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 29, 2011, 05:50:47 PM


How do you avoid the libod, sex drive problem....I don't have Bp problem with tren but it almost kill my sex drive..

Do you think If I add mastron will ge good I dea to prevent that

You shouldn't have issues unless your prolactin gets out of hand. Take care of that and you'll have the exact opposite problem.

Masterona is always a good idea. Compliments tren, as well as any other AAS pretty well. Test, tren and mast are awesome and you can run a low dose of each like I do. I personally don't like pinning tons of oil nor can my body tolerate it, so this works out great.

God, I've injected trenbolona acetate twice now (from Nordic) and I haven't had the infamous tren cough yet. Have I been lucky or...? ???

I am not God, but if I may... not everyone gets tren cough. The probability of you getting a few coughs are a lot higher because you use a considerably pure tren. The best, actually.

Don't fret though. It's not something you WANT to get. If and when you do get it, hold onto your lug nuts. It can be worse for some, but all in all it's pretty fucking miserable. :D
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: flinstones1 on October 29, 2011, 06:14:10 PM
no one, when you were at your biggest in terms of actual muscle mass,  were you on any test? 

gh15, mentioned,  was at his biggest on no (or low I dont remember) doses of testosterone, but lots of NPP and eq. There is a belief that some guys have like bulsemo, that feel  androgens in too high of doses,  can actually provide their own antidote against muscle growth past a certain point and the only way to break that plateau is to megadose anabolics/low test.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 29, 2011, 06:21:05 PM
no one, when you were at your biggest in terms of actual muscle mass,  were you on any test? 

gh15, mentioned,  was at his biggest on no (or low I dont remember) doses of testosterone, but lots of NPP and eq. There is a belief that some guys have like bulsemo, that feel  androgens in too high of doses,  can actually provide their own antidote against muscle growth past a certain point and the only way to break that plateau is to megadose anabolics/low test.

yes you are actulay one of them,, for fella like you lower testosterona higher anabolic will do marvelous to the physiqe if train consistantly and really want to be bodybuild,, will do marvelous things,, ofcourse keep some testosterona ..but cycle it

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: jude2 on October 29, 2011, 06:48:31 PM

How do you avoid the libod, sex drive problem....I don't have Bp problem with tren but it almost kill my sex drive..

Do you think If I add mastron will ge good I dea to prevent that
gh15 why do some say that Tren kills their sex drive and other become porn stars with it? The response is total opposite. Most guys are set to think a drug only does one thing to all.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 29, 2011, 07:09:54 PM
because some fellas use those stupid anti aromataze and all this research balonie and kill their estrogen to unimaginable levels and then they are fucked,, body need estrogen fellas,, it does! you cant just eliminate estrogen ...it is needed for growth and! for sex!!!

find the sweet spot and remain thre,,also some inject diff prodiucts with trenbolona it iwl depend on that too,, majority of legit trenbolona user are walking horn balls they can jack off to comand,, they really look for porns because the woman cant take it no more,, what woman can take it all the time,, it gets tired

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Devon97 on October 29, 2011, 07:30:22 PM
gh15,

What anti-e or etc should be taken w/ a tren ace, test prop cycle?

TO prevent progresterone gyno?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: L.L on October 29, 2011, 07:31:39 PM
not everybody is prone to Tren cough..I just finished my first bottle of Strangos and no coughs..Ive used others in the past and the same thing I dont cough.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Swlabr on October 29, 2011, 07:36:33 PM
It's 2:36 AM here and I can't sleep at all and buzzing out of my chair, lol.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 29, 2011, 07:51:52 PM
not everybody is prone to Tren cough..I just finished my first bottle of Strangos and no coughs..Ive used others in the past and the same thing I dont cough.

the cough only happen IF you hit vessle,, blood vessele ,, if you dont you have no cough,,

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: gh15 on October 29, 2011, 07:57:40 PM
It's 2:36 AM here and I can't sleep at all and buzzing out of my chair, lol.

the all bodybuild nwo day is a game between doses of trenbolona and doses of hgh,, this is it friend,, really the bodybuild per say now day is a game of war between gh and trenbolona where none wins and they combine powers ,,

bodybuild wil advance according to how much gh he can afford,, bodybuild will be more conditioned according to how much trenbolona and how much gh he can afford to put together into his blood,,

gh will make you sleep very well ,, it will cancel the trenbolona sleeplesnesss effect,, it wil balance it all ,, some stil have problem and they go to other venture usualy drugs that help sleep which is a mistake ,, but! as i always say to you ....

whenever you see professional dont ever be impressed alwys know! it is a result of lots and lots of hgh and trenbolona ,, the number of impressive bodybuild due to muscle shape is much lower than the number of impressive bodybuild due to trenbolona and hgh,,

ofcourse you owe to know that liars such as heris and the rest they are on hgh and on trenbolona and have bad genetic strcutre and worst genetic responds thats why never go on npc high level competitions,, but! they use it too

bodybuild = dancing with the stars,, who are the stars? ,,gh and trenbolona ace

gh15 approved
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: aesthetics on October 29, 2011, 08:02:20 PM
I know someone who claims to have been on tren for over 15 years straight and he gets routine blood work. He's a past Mr. Canada and has had an IFBB pro card as well. He's just fine and thinks the whole craze about tren being "dangerous" and "not for beginners" is bullshit.

Tren toxicity is overblown. Yes, tren gives you cloudy piss and that's about it. Someone tried stringing together a mish mash of "facts" together to paint a picture about tren. All bro science. Beginners or people who only wish to cycle should DEFINITELY use tren and avoid the classic 500mg of test for 8 weeks type cycles. Make the most of your time while you're on and transform as much as possible to raise your natural physique once you come off. I think coming off is a waste of time, but I don't think doing tren for a first cycle is. Tren is amazing.

it is not bro science, it all stems from tren hex, the old french parabolan, which definitely was toxic because of that ester. there were studies done on cattle and livestock and it was toxic to the liver and kidneys at relatively low dosages
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: L.L on October 29, 2011, 08:02:58 PM
gh15

whats the review on 2011 redtropins??
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: aesthetics on October 29, 2011, 08:10:53 PM
when i use npp and tren ace together i dont (read: cant- and ive tried) go over 3-400mg a wk of each compound. i have a great tolerance for anabolics, which is good and bad- i dont get the sides, but i need a lot to grow. anyway running those dosages i found i didnt need the masteron. once you tried running npp and tren together you'll see why i kept it where i did. they're fucking tough on your mental state esp run together. and the hairline. esp npp. i dunno what it is with npp but it makes me shed like crazy, even on 1mg of finesteride ed. i was on 800mg of npp a week. i was loving life. i wasnt loving what it was doing to my hairline

bro... npp is nandrolone-phenylpropionate, and nandrolone is actually very mild on the hair itself because when it gets converted by the 5-alpha reductase enzyme in the scalp it turns into a weaker androgen. however finasteride effectively removes the 5-alpha-reductase-2 enzyme from your system and it will cause you to lose more hair when using it in combination with nandrolone. finasteride only works with test, and i don't think it even does that great of a job with it but its effects vary with different people.

has your hair grown back or is it thinner now?

also, are you sure it was the npp that was making your hair fall out more than any other compound because masteron is practically pure androgen and would make you shed more than even tren. its weird that you'd have worse hairloss on npp than the others
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 29, 2011, 08:51:22 PM
it is not bro science, it all stems from tren hex, the old french parabolan, which definitely was toxic because of that ester. there were studies done on cattle and livestock and it was toxic to the liver and kidneys at relatively low dosages

That's true. But the internet is awash with terabytes of bro science and that's the majority of what I see.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: notsureifsrs on October 29, 2011, 11:24:26 PM
It has nothing to do with purity. I know guy who's got 180/100 bp on 500mg of test and 30mg of dianabol. Everything made by Jelfa, it's Poland.
Maybe he had high BP to start with ? or at least just more than the normal range, or BP issues in the family?
 
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: pellius on October 30, 2011, 02:32:34 AM
How important is the ester when using tren? gh15 insists on acetate but how much of a real world difference would there be using enanthate? It's certainly more cost effective as tren enan is dosed at 200mg/ml whereas tren acetate is dosed at 100mg/ml but the enanthate is maybe only $10 more than a vial of acetate? And you don't have to pin ed or eod but maybe once or twice a week like any other enanthate ester. I believe Groink used tren enanthate and it seemed to do him well. I remember in my day (and I'm sure Coach can confirm this) parabolan was the magic elixir. And if I remember correctly it was dose at 76mg (yes, 76mg) and was in a 1.5ml amp. Three amps a week was the recommended dosages but ed was for the hard core. It's half life was longer that acetate though I'm not sure by how much. Maybe combining both enanthate with acetate might be a good idea. I remember gh15 once mentioning how combining a long ester test as a base and foundation along with prop would make for an ideal anabolic environment.   

My upcoming cycle I was planning on running tren acetate but I am reconsidering going with parabolan.
I understand the differences between tren-A and tren-E, but I am not all that familiar with parabolon, which for those who don't know the active ingredient is Trenbolone hexahydrobenzylcarbonate . From what I understand it has all the benefits of tren-A, but has a longer ester attached to it, so you only need to
shoot it bout every 3 days. Other than less frequent injections, which doesn't really bother me anyway, what would be some of the benefits of going with parabolan over tren-A?

I'm feeling a little stupid for asking this question, I feel I should know this already.  Anyway, what are your opinions? Let me know guys, I put a lot of weight into what a lot of you say. Tthis does not include some of you retards who post here, I really wish you all would go away... so let it be written, so let it be done ;)
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: nosleep on October 30, 2011, 02:38:33 AM
How important is the ester when using tren? gh15 insists on acetate but how much of a real world difference would there be using enanthate? It's certainly more cost effective as tren enan is dosed at 200mg/ml whereas tren acetate is dosed at 100mg/ml but the enanthate is maybe only $10 more than a vial of acetate? And you don't have to pin ed or eod but maybe once or twice a week like any other enanthate ester. I believe Groink used tren enanthate and it seemed to do him well. I remember in my day (and I'm sure Coach can confirm this) parabolan was the magic elixir. And if I remember correctly it was dose at 76mg (yes, 76mg) and was in a 1.5ml amp. Three amps a week was the recommended dosages but ed was for the hard core. It's half life was longer that acetate though I'm not sure by how much. Maybe combining both enanthate with acetate might be a good idea. I remember gh15 once mentioning how combining a long ester test as a base and foundation along with prop would make for an ideal anabolic environment.   


I IMAGINE ANY QUALITY DRUG IS HELPFUL, BUT WHATS OPTIMAL?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: deceiver on October 30, 2011, 02:43:56 AM
Maybe he had high BP to start with ? or at least just more than the normal range, or BP issues in the family?
 

Normal bp when off and bp issues in the family, like anyone nowadays anyway. I had 150/80 on 500mg of test without AI. I am bloted like hell on this dose. Also legit farm grade test straight from Jelfa...

So I think AI is a must for me.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: notsureifsrs on October 30, 2011, 03:11:43 AM
Normal bp when off and bp issues in the family, like anyone nowadays anyway. I had 150/80 on 500mg of test without AI. I am bloted like hell on this dose. Also legit farm grade test straight from Jelfa...

So I think AI is a must for me.
What did your diet looked like?
sodium intake?
you did any cardio?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: deceiver on October 30, 2011, 03:18:24 AM
What did your diet looked like?
sodium intake?
you did any cardio?

cardio 3 times a week after workout, clean high carb diet, when I cut down sodium it helped for few days but not in the long run.

it doesn't matter, off I can use any salt I want and not get bloated by a tiny bit without any cardio. now i'm cruising on 150mg test/week and I have to use little bit of AI still for some reason.

i am really sensitive to test and prefer high anabolic. i never used tren but i think high tren and low test will do the trick for me in terms of condition and so on.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: Van_Bilderass on October 30, 2011, 03:22:48 AM
This is the first year I've used tren but have gone through several bottles of different brands and not gotten the cough even once.

I did have the cough with other UG gear other than tren. I didn't connect it to the gear, thought I was allergic to something in my workplace or something. It wasn't when injecting, it was coming and going all through the day. It went away when I was just using HG test so it was the gear definitely.


Normal bp when off and bp issues in the family, like anyone nowadays anyway. I had 150/80 on 500mg of test without AI. I am bloted like hell on this dose. Also legit farm grade test straight from Jelfa...

So I think AI is a must for me.

My brother did 5 amps of Cidoteston and bloated like crazy immediately. Yesterday he told me he will never take any test ever again as it's a complete shit drug in his opinion. He even threw away a few extra amps I'd given him, I would've taken them so I was a bit pissed.  :D
He loved Anadrol and Dbol. No bloating...the "bloat" you get from these is within the muscle, unlike test which makes you ankles, wrists etc bloat. It's the same with me, test even at low dose makes my ankles bloat. I can't train well on test as it makes me cramp like crazy and it feels like I'll tear a muscle any moment even squatting with just the bar. It messes with the water/mineral balance too much.

Tren and Anadrol or Dbol = win for me.

IMO, the ankle bloat you see with guys like Kai Greene is from too much test, not necessarily kidney problems (yet). I see now what Disgusted and others have been saying about test... it's a pretty shit drug.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: deceiver on October 30, 2011, 03:26:53 AM
Yeah and all it does for me in terms of anabolic is I gain some new vains, get bloated, get much stronger and that's it. Now when I put deca in that mix (and I did that for the very first time last time which was a mistake) I just fucking GROW tissue.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: no one on October 30, 2011, 10:31:52 AM
aesthetics- hey bro thanks for the reply and for looking out. yeah it has to be the NPP which baffles me too. I stopped tren ace a month ago, and I'm running a test blend right now at 750mg/wk. that's it. I have run test as high as 2g/wk without this much shedding. also, I thought it was happening the last time I used it too, then I was like, nah it can't be you know? doesn't make sense when you look at how it works. but this time I know it's the npp. the test and npp are the only two compounds i was running. weird I know. as for regrowth I just stopped the npp a week ago.

pellius- I don't think anyone can answer definitively why ace works so much better when all that differentiates the blends is the ester but everone I know feels the same way. ace is king. just like there is no real solid evidence for ed shots of tren work better than eod shots but they do.

van b- great post as always and I agree abt your summation regarding test.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: apply85 on October 30, 2011, 11:29:33 AM
you don't use eq, van?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: notsureifsrs on October 30, 2011, 12:22:16 PM
cardio 3 times a week after workout, clean high carb diet, when I cut down sodium it helped for few days but not in the long run.

it doesn't matter, off I can use any salt I want and not get bloated by a tiny bit without any cardio. now i'm cruising on 150mg test/week and I have to use little bit of AI still for some reason.

i am really sensitive to test and prefer high anabolic. i never used tren but i think high tren and low test will do the trick for me in terms of condition and so on.
So why not just going on Disgusted route and use only anabolics?

Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 30, 2011, 12:28:56 PM
I only prefer a smaller amount of test as well. The first time I tried a gram of test, I broke out with huge welt like zits on my back that I couldn't pop. Deep, red and purple bastards all down my middle and lower back where I've never broken out. :-X

I recently tried NO test and don't like it. I like a small amount cycled in and out. I switch between sustanon and prop and shoot EOD for both. It rounds things off and after a certain amount there are diminishing returns (that changes if you're taking mutation doses of GH though).
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: g101 on October 30, 2011, 01:50:06 PM
high dose test made me very hairy AND FAST !!!!!!! i was like  :o
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: kevinf on October 30, 2011, 01:54:16 PM
I only prefer a smaller amount of test as well. The first time I tried a gram of test, I broke out with huge welt like zits on my back that I couldn't pop. Deep, red and purple bastards all down my middle and lower back where I've never broken out. :-X

I recently tried NO test and don't like it. I like a small amount cycled in and out. I switch between sustanon and prop and shoot EOD for both. It rounds things off and after a certain amount there are diminishing returns (that changes if you're taking mutation doses of GH though).

I agree with this. Im currently on a no test cycle too, i got rid of test because fo the acne it gave me..but without test im lackin the thickness. Im going to try cycling small doses of test e in and out..what small amounts of test do you cycle brah?
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: da_vinci on October 30, 2011, 02:03:14 PM
high dose test made me very hairy AND FAST !!!!!!! i was like  :o

Fast, you mean - speed, like - running?

Should be a sweet feeling if you are into it..
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: deceiver on October 30, 2011, 02:26:38 PM
So why not just going on Disgusted route and use only anabolics?



My libido would hurt, I think 250-350mg a week is plenty though.

Next cycle will be
150-200mg of test e4d
300mg of deca e4d
anadrol/dianabol for first 4-5 weeks.

then 50mg of prop e2d and 100mg of tren e2d. it's crazy and my libido will suffer for sure but who cares when you have proviron. without any test at all proviron wouldn't help.
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 30, 2011, 04:15:36 PM
Fast, you mean - speed, like - running?

Should be a sweet feeling if you are into it..

He means fast with the ladies.

Pump, pump, NUT!! One pump, two maybe if he's feeling like a sexy brute. ;) ;D
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: aesthetics on October 30, 2011, 07:05:03 PM
I only prefer a smaller amount of test as well. The first time I tried a gram of test, I broke out with huge welt like zits on my back that I couldn't pop. Deep, red and purple bastards all down my middle and lower back where I've never broken out. :-X

I recently tried NO test and don't like it. I like a small amount cycled in and out. I switch between sustanon and prop and shoot EOD for both. It rounds things off and after a certain amount there are diminishing returns (that changes if you're taking mutation doses of GH though).

what do you usually run for the base of a cycle then? deca, eq, tren? everyone gets sides differently and reacts differently to compounds but... seems as though the bad backne is from high androgen levels so something like tren would probably cause the same sides, so i'm curious if you are fine running high tren or is it the same as the test?

from what i've heard/read its pretty common for most people to get bad sides once they hit 1gram test or about there. i'm ok until i hit 1,500 a week and then it feels like my heart is just dying

Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: g101 on October 30, 2011, 07:36:52 PM
He means fast with the ladies.

Pump, pump, NUT!! One pump, two maybe if he's feeling like a sexy brute. ;) ;D

 ;D
Title: Re: inregard trenbolona ace contribution to sub par genetic structures
Post by: dustin on October 30, 2011, 07:43:32 PM
what do you usually run for the base of a cycle then? deca, eq, tren? everyone gets sides differently and reacts differently to compounds but... seems as though the bad backne is from high androgen levels so something like tren would probably cause the same sides, so i'm curious if you are fine running high tren or is it the same as the test?

from what i've heard/read its pretty common for most people to get bad sides once they hit 1gram test or about there. i'm ok until i hit 1,500 a week and then it feels like my heart is just dying



I had thought higher androgens would have been the culprit, but tren is more androgenic and I've run a lot more androgenics cycles with no problems. When the test creeps up near the gram mark I start breaking out a little no matter how evenly I pin. Other compounds don't appear to have an affect either, so I just keep the test around 500mg/week or so. This is true even with HG test so I've written test off as not being as great as people online make it out to be.

I'm honestly just blasting and cruising with a lot more cruising than anything. I don't like coming off, plus I used it as a weak excuse for curbing any unwanted pregnancies. Now we're actually wanting to conceive so I'm seeing how things go and might come off for a bit if nothing happens soon. Got some ancillaries to kick up the LH and FSH, but if the wife gets impatient I may come off. I don't like that idea though. Although I'm under 30, I wouldn't mind staying on self-prescribed HRT for life. I'm going to be on it anyway, so might as well never have to "come off". :)