Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: reppingfor20 on March 01, 2012, 04:35:05 PM
-
Rush Limbaugh Doubles Down On Sandra Fluke, Offering ‘As Much Aspirin to Put Between Her Knees As She Wants’
The conservative radio host continued: “What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps.”
Fox News said that if she doesn't have a lawyer now, she will by tomorrow mourning to sue him, they said she could even sue him for $$$ for what he said and they said he went over the line, fox news said this on their tv show.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/rush-limbaugh-sandra-fluke-a-slut-and-prostitute/
-
No, but liberals would try anything to get a buck as long as it doesn't involve work.
-
The Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Bomb Squad was called to Limbaugh's Palm Beach home to assist the Palm Beach Police Department after the well-known radio host received a package from Pennsylvania earlier in the day.
A multitude of emergency vehicles rushed to the 1400 block of 1400 N. Ocean Blvd. before 6 p.m.
Limbaugh has a scanning device at home, from where he does his radio show, and a package showed wires inside, so he called police.
Read more: http://www.wpbf.com/news/30582603/detail.html#ixzz1nuvXnNsz
-
No, but liberals would try anything to get a buck as long as it doesn't involve work.
Work is for ants.
-
No, but liberals would try anything to get a buck as long as it doesn't involve work.
if she could sue him for a couple million, why work? It is the smart move on her part, she has nothing to lose. Who said she was a liberal?
-
That's the problem with this country. What ever happend to the first amendment. Pussiefied liberal want to sue for everything. Fucken nanny state.
-
she should get jackie chiles on the phone asap!
-
Rush Limbaugh Doubles Down On Sandra Fluke, Offering ‘As Much Aspirin to Put Between Her Knees As She Wants’
The conservative radio host continued: “What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps.”
Fox News said that if she doesn't have a lawyer now, she will by tomorrow mourning to sue him, they said she could even sue him for $$$ for what he said and they said he went over the line, fox news said this on their tv show.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/rush-limbaugh-sandra-fluke-a-slut-and-prostitute/
hahaha, that's some good logic actually
-
It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps.”
I completely disagree with this analogy. If anything, the scenario makes us taxpayers the johns.
If we were the pimps, we'd be collecting a percentage; not paying.
Actually, "johns" is the perfect term for us, since we're paying money AND getting screwed.
-
I completely disagree with this analogy. If anything, the scenario makes us taxpayers the johns.
If we were the pimps, we'd be collecting a percentage; not paying.
Actually, "johns" is the perfect term for us, since we're paying money AND getting screwed.
maybe rush doesn't visit prostitutes that much ? seems odd though with him, you would think he would be high on oxy bangin hookers on an all nighter.
-
Who said she was a liberal?
Her skewed idealisms.
-
She says it costs thousands of dollars a month for birth control ::) How much sex is this fat slut having? Fucken gimme mentality of these people. I can understand being upset with the insurance company for not covering certain things but this is not reasonable.
-
Don't know if this was already said, but she is a law student at Georgetown
-
She says it costs thousands of dollars a month for birth control ::) How much sex is this fat slut having? Fucken gimme mentality of these people. I can understand being upset with the insurance company for not covering certain things but this is not reasonable.
hahah it costs a few dollars for a pack of condoms for a week.
-
She says it costs thousands of dollars a month for birth control ::) How much sex is this fat slut having? Fucken gimme mentality of these people. I can understand being upset with the insurance company for not covering certain things but this is not reasonable.
it can't cost that much, to be on the pill for a month no way, has to be under 50$ a month I would bet. The taxpayers should pay for it, how many bastard children do you want running around because you have to realize young kids will fuck no matter what.
-
Rush Limbaugh Doubles Down On Sandra Fluke, Offering ‘As Much Aspirin to Put Between Her Knees As She Wants’
The conservative radio host continued: “What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps.”
Fox News said that if she doesn't have a lawyer now, she will by tomorrow mourning to sue him, they said she could even sue him for $$$ for what he said and they said he went over the line, fox news said this on their tv show.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/rush-limbaugh-sandra-fluke-a-slut-and-prostitute/
Rush can actually be sued for slander because he called her a prostitute. Won't be much money however and besides, he's got money to burn
-
Because earning what you have gives you pride, life experience, and self respect. Who cares if she's liberal. She's open for business and that's all that matters. She is hormoned up, sterile, and ready to be spunked in
speak for yourself, many people feel like slaves working the day away. Most would rather win the jackpot or win a multi million dollar lawsuit like this than work some stupid job all their life, a anonymous poll would probably be like 80 - 20 percent in favor of the lottery/lawsuit life.
-
Rush can actually be sued for slander because he called her a prostitute. Won't be much money however and besides, he's got money to burn
how much do you think?
-
The taxpayers should pay for it, how many bastard children do you want running around
Yes, we (WORKING tax payers) pay for those, too, and we should not pay for either.
-
Don't know if this was already said, but she is a law student at Georgetown
And now this whore will never get a job after school showing what a mooching pofs she is.
BTW - why can't the men pay for the condoms?
-
Because earning what you have gives you pride, life experience, and self respect.
Yes. The act of taking/receiving something for which you did not work/earn/pay is called theft.
Only a thief or a complete idiot would not agree with this statement.
-
The world will b a better place when he finally has that heart attack
-
Yes. The act of taking/receiving something for which you did not work/earn/pay is called theft.
Only a thief or a complete idiot would not agree with this statement.
If this slut is so broke that she can't afford a few rubbers, maybe she should focus on getting a part time job instead of screwing so much.
-
Yes. The act of taking/receiving something for which you did not work/earn/pay is called theft.
Only a thief or a complete idiot would not agree with this statement.
so all lawsuits that involve money are theft? Divorces? Winning lottery? etc etc are theft? How about when you get money given to you by your family that has died, and are a young rich man like Mitt Romney? Is Mitt a thief because he inherited money he did not earn?
-
how much do you think?
Most she could get is 5,000 dollars. Rush's net worth is between 350-400 million dollars. He could pull that money from the crack of his ass and still have enough to buy 3 of Coach's house.
-
so all lawsuits that involve money are theft? Divorces? Winning lottery? etc etc are theft? How about when you get money given to you by your family that has died, and are a young rich man like Mitt Romney? Is Mitt a thief because he inherited money he did not earn?
Her own claims and testimony bar a lawsuit since she admitted to rushs claims.
-
Man, I agree. But you CAN win if you work hard and I have felt like a slave many times. But I kept working. And when I look back, I realize I was being a little bit of an immature pussy. Most people that hit the lottery lose all their money and end up broke. You have to have the life experience to know how to govern yourself when you have money. Otherwise you end up not good. Working hard makes you hard. You will use your money and guard it better. I'm not flaming you man. Seriously, I'm telling you truth.
I understand what you are saying that if you work hard for what you earn you will be a lot more careful how you spend it. I saw those shows on TV about the lottery people who won 100's of millions of dollars down the road are now bankrupt and lives torn apart.
-
If this slut is so broke that she can't afford a few rubbers, maybe she should focus on getting a part time job instead of screwing so much.
Yes, let's put all the financial and sexual burden of the sex act on the female. ::)
-
If this slut is so broke that she can't afford a few rubbers, maybe she should focus on getting a part time job instead of screwing so much.
Either that or start taking dick in the ass....
-
Being a muslim, you should agree with his sexist comments.
-
a part time job would take away time for her studies though at college, not good.
-
a part time job would take away time for her studies though at college, not good.
Less time riding cawk would give the whore more time to crack a book.
-
Less time riding cawk would give the whore more time to crack a book.
but she can have sex in her dorm room, getting to work takes time, the sex probably doesn't take that much time away from her studies vs a part time job.
also she is too young to be working any type of job, that is child labor.
-
Yes, let's put all the financial and sexual burden of the sex act on the female. ::)
Who are all these different guys she is fucking? Is it so much for her to make them pay for rubbers?
-
but she can have sex in her dorm room, getting to work takes time, the sex probably doesn't take that much time away from her studies vs a part time job.
also she is too young to be working any type of job, that is child labor.
0/10 troll
-
Who are all these different guys she is fucking? Is it so much for her to make them pay for rubbers?
it's not her problem she's hot.
-
but she can have sex in her dorm room, getting to work takes time, the sex probably doesn't take that much time away from her studies vs a part time job.
also she is too young to be working any type of job, that is child labor.
23 is too young? I held jobs since 12 years old.
-
23 is too young? I held jobs since 12 years old.
i'm sorry to hear that is terrible, you were a child labor victim, it is too late though to report it to the police :-\
-
Who are all these different guys she is fucking? Is it so much for her to make them pay for rubbers?
Hehe. Like you had no part in that post. ::)
//simpleton
-
23 is too young? I held jobs since 12 years old.
Reppingfor20 has been getting paid to have sex with the tribal elders since he was eleven.
-
Hehe. Like you had no part in that post. ::)
//simpleton
Why should any taxpayer have to pay for this STD riddled whore to keep screwing people?
-
rubbers for the guy make sex not as good, so rubbers are not an option, birth control should be paid for by taxpayer so no bastard children are running around, kids will fuck no matter what. Also free std treatment too since those will get passed around, need to keep good health of our young people.
-
Why should any taxpayer have to pay for this STD riddled whore to keep screwing people?
so you won't have to pay for her bastard children she would be having else wise. Also the taxpayer should pay for her std treatment so she doesn't pass it around to other youth, we need to keep our youth healthy.
-
so all lawsuits that involve money are theft? Divorces? Winning lottery? etc etc are theft? How about when you get money given to you by your family that has died, and are a young rich man like Mitt Romney? Is Mitt a thief because he inherited money he did not earn?
No, “Captain Non-Sequitur.” Clearly, my point is not resonating in your simple, yet impenetrable mind. So, let’s look at your scenarios:
Suing: Constitutes acquiring/hiring legal representation to pursue a wrong that was committed against you. Rush used a poor choice of words. If this girl successfully sues him, then she DESERVES a settlement.
Divorces: Both parties contribute to a marriage while it’s in effect, hence, both parties DESERVE to receive portions of the accumulated assets after it’s over.
The Lottery: You purchased a ticket in a game of chance. You win. You DESERVE the payout for paying into and winning the game.
Family Inheritance: Inheritances are willingly given; not forcibly taken. If you are the fortunate recipient of an inheritance, then you did something to DESERVE what you receive from the dearly departed.
People in each of the above scenarios earned what they received by doing something to DESERVE it. Please explain how or why an overweight and (apparently) horny chick DESERVES my money to purchase contraceptives.
-
so you won't have to pay for her bastard children she would be having else wise. Also the taxpayer should pay for her std treatment so she doesn't pass it around to other youth, we need to keep our youth healthy.
She is a fucking law student!
-
hahah it costs a few dollars for a pack of condoms for a week.
It appears that this woman is not only a ho, but a broke one as well. If she's that hard up for rubbers, she can drive to the hood or the sticks or the trailer park section of town, hit the free clinics there, and get jimmy hats for FREE.
Of course, that would involve her being around poor people and we can't have that, now can we?
-
so you won't have to pay for her bastard children she would be having else wise.
And, as I already mentioned, we should not be paying for them, either.
-
People in each of the above scenarios earned what they received by doing something to DESERVE it. Please explain how or why an overweight and (apparently) horny chick DESERVES my money to purchase contraceptives.
so you won't have to pay for the bastard children she would be having, that would be much more expensive.
-
Rush can actually be sued for slander because he called her a prostitute. Won't be much money however and besides, he's got money to burn
PLEASE!! If she can sue Rush for slander, then Rush could sue NEARLY ALL of the left-winged media outlets, blogs, and Democrat politicians (who have twisted and misstated his words) AND MAKE A KILLING!!!
-
And, as I already mentioned, we should not be paying for them, either.
but you are, that is reality, your being an idealist now.
-
so you won't have to pay for the bastard children she would be having, that would be much more expensive.
Sure, as if it's SOOOOOOO impossible for this dizzy woman TO KEEP HER LEGS CLOSED, until she can afford to get some rubbers or pills on her own. ::)
-
Rush can actually be sued for slander because he called her a prostitute. Won't be much money however and besides, he's got money to burn
Guess that mail order diploma mill didn't offer a law class huh?
-
so you won't have to pay for the bastard children she would be having, that would be much more expensive.
And, as I already mentioned, we should not be paying for them, either.
And, as I already mentioned, we should not be paying for them, either.
And, as I already mentioned, we should not be paying for them, either.
And, as I already mentioned, we should not be paying for them, either.
And, as I already mentioned, we should not be paying for them, either.
Read my question once more...a little more carefully...
Please explain how or why an overweight and (apparently) horny chick DESERVES my money to purchase contraceptives.
Why does SHE deserve it?
Really, I can't type this any slower.
-
but you are, that is reality, your being an idealist now.
"Your" right.
However, my ideals of everyone paying their own way and not purchasing what they can't afford is not skewed like your mantra of entitlement, thievery, and now debauchery.
-
Read my question once more...a little more carefully...
Please explain how or why an overweight and (apparently) horny chick DESERVES my money to purchase contraceptives.
Why does SHE deserve it?
Really, I can't type this any slower.
the question shouldn't be why does she deserve it, she is entitled to it. The US taxpayers should be concerned with the youths health and how many illegitimate children are running around committing crime. You can't have it both ways.
If you don't help her out, crime will go up, if you help her out, a fraction of your tax that get's taken out of your paycheck will go to it and by fraction I mean 1/10,000 th of the tax you pay or even less, so why make such a big deal about it?
-
the question shouldn't be why does she deserve it, she is entitled to it. The US taxpayers should be concerned with the youths health and how many illegitimate children are running around committing crime. You can't have it both ways.
If you don't help her out, crime will go up, if you help her out, a fraction of your tax that get's taken out of your paycheck will go to it and by fraction I mean 1/10,000 th of the tax you pay or even less, so why make such a big deal about it?
I'm sorry! What law states that she's entitled to screw without consequence again? This sounds like typical left-winged tripe, blaming OTHER PEOPLE for the utterly STUPID behavior of someone else. If she wants to sling coochie all over Georgetown's campus, then SHE NEEDS TO BUY HER OWN RUBBERS, PILLS, or whatever.
And, if she gets knocked up anyway, then SHE'S responsible to either raise (or dismember in the womb) her child.
I liked playing Madden football, when I was in college. Was I entitled to have taxpayers foot the bill for my Sega/Super Nintendo habit?
-
I'm sorry! What law states that she's entitled to screw without consequence again? This sounds like typical left-winged tripe, blaming OTHER PEOPLE for the utterly STUPID behavior of someone else. If she wants to sling coochie all over Georgetown's campus, then SHE NEEDS TO BUY HER OWN RUBBERS, PILLS, or whatever.
And, if she gets knocked up anyway, then SHE'S responsible to either raise (or dismember in the womb) her child.
I liked playing Madden football, when I was in college. Was I entitled to have taxpayers foot the bill for my Sega/Super Nintendo habit?
Forgot about you. The GPS co-ordinates for Noah's Ark is? :
-
Forgot about you. The GPS co-ordinates for Noah's Ark is? :
Why don't get a clue and stick to the topic at hand, namely why taxpayers should fund some girl's desire to screw without consequence?
As usual, when you have nothing to say of consequence, you resort to foolishness like this.
-
No, but liberals would try anything to get a buck as long as it doesn't involve work.
So true with one of my employees
-
That's the problem with this country. What ever happend to the first amendment. Pussiefied liberal want to sue for everything. Fucken nanny state.
x2
suing someone is so gay
-
Why don't get a clue and stick to the topic at hand, namely why taxpayers should fund some girl's desire to screw without consequence?
As usual, when
Hehe. Awesome non-English reply. ::)
-
Why don't get a clue and stick to the topic at hand, namely why taxpayers should fund some girl's desire to screw without consequence?
As usual, when
Hehe. Awesome non-English reply. ::)
That's a simple typo. What's your excuse for the silliness you spew (especially when not answering a simple question)?
-
That's a simple typo. What's your excuse for the silliness you spew (especially when not answering a simple question)?
Still waiting on that gps. *yawn* And it is?
-
Go figure, the racist 95ers Nd Islamist jihadis are in favor of this.
-
Still waiting on that gps. *yawn* And it is?
Keep waiting. This is a different topic. Try sticking to the issue at hand and addressing (for once).
-
the question shouldn't be why does she deserve it, she is entitled to it.
Okay, last time...
WHY should she be entitled to it?
What did she do to deserve it?
I know you have no concept of what it means to earn or deserve something as opposed to receiving it for nothing from people who do work.
But, just this once, try REEEEEEEEEAL hard to understand.
You don't even have to be smart to grasp this. All it takes is a thimble-full of common sense.
-
Okay, last time...
WHY should she be entitled to it?
What did she do to deserve it?
I know you have no concept of what it means to earn or deserve something as opposed to receiving it for nothing from people who do work.
But, just this once, try REEEEEEEEEAL hard to understand.
You don't even have to be smart to grasp this. All it takes is a thimble-full of common sense.
this stupid whore will never be hired after this stunt.
-
Okay, last time...
WHY should she be entitled to it?
What did she do to deserve it?
I know you have no concept of what it means to earn or deserve something as opposed to receiving it for nothing from people who do work.
But, just this once, try REEEEEEEEEAL hard to understand.
You don't even have to be smart to grasp this. All it takes is a thimble-full of common sense.
Ain't it funny how some of these allegedly smart people have the darnedest time answering the simplest of questions?
-
Sued for the truth? I think not
-
Keep waiting. This is a different topic. Try sticking to the issue at hand and addressing (for once).
Hehe. Obfuscatory lying pos. Only a matter of time before you get your ass busted in a bathroom in Minneapolis. enjoy. :)
-
Sued for the truth? I think not
Rush simply called her what most people in this country would call a gal, going broke giving up her goodies to half the campus (and having the GALL to demand that the school, a historically CATHOLIC institution, foot the bill for her whoring to keep her from getting knocked up).
-
Rush simply called her what most people in this country would call a gal, going broke giving up her goodies to half the campus (and having the GALL to demand that the school, a historically CATHOLIC institution, foot the bill for her whoring to keep her from getting knocked up).
Lol!!!!
-
Hehe. Obfuscatory lying pos. Only a matter of time before you get your ass busted in a bathroom in Minneapolis. enjoy. :)
So, not only are you a coward, it appears you have a case of projection.
One more time, try addressing the subject matter here. Here's a hint, genius: It ain't Noah's Ark.
Condoms are not only free in certain areas; but so are CLUES and common sense. I suggest you stock up.
-
It's really fucking sad that this discussion is even taking place.
Whatever happened to being held accountable for your actions?
This is absolutely ridiculous, if she can't afford contraception then she shouldn't be having sex, and if she doesn't follow this simple logic the consequences are her responsibility.
If she doesn't understand this then she shouldn't be at a university. Higher education is for those with the mental capacity to absorb and implement it, she doesnt seem like the type to be able to do either one.
-
It's really fucking sad that this discussion is even taking place.
Whatever happened to being held accountable for your actions?
This is absolutely ridiculous, if she can't afford contraception then she shouldn't be having sex, and if she doesn't follow this simple logic the consequences are her responsibility.
If she doesn't understand this then she shouldn't be at a university. Higher education is for those with the mental capacity to absorb and implement it, she doesnt seem like the type to be able to do either one.
This is beyond a mere stupid girl, trying to screw without consequence on someone else's dime (again, a few trips to the free clinic would solve her so-called plight quickly; though, she may need to go there for other issues). This is a political ploy, to paint Obama's future opponent as someone who's going to take women's rights away. It's no mere coincidence that this is being done, as Obama's approval numbers among women have DROPPED considerably.
Here are some of the free clinics in DC.
http://yourstdhelp.com/district_of_columbia.html
And the reason she can't go there to stock up on jimmy hats, free of charge, no questions asked would be........
-
Okay, last time...
WHY should she be entitled to it?
What did she do to deserve it?
I know you have no concept of what it means to earn or deserve something as opposed to receiving it for nothing from people who do work.
But, just this once, try REEEEEEEEEAL hard to understand.
You don't even have to be smart to grasp this. All it takes is a thimble-full of common sense.
She is entitled to it, deserves it because health care is a right. Part of health care being a right is woman's health that includes birth control.
-
It's really fucking sad that this discussion is even taking place.
Whatever happened to being held accountable for your actions?
This is absolutely ridiculous, if she can't afford contraception then she shouldn't be having sex, and if she doesn't follow this simple logic the consequences are her responsibility.
If she doesn't understand this then she shouldn't be at a university. Higher education is for those with the mental capacity to absorb and implement it, she doesnt seem like the type to be able to do either one.
wrong, young people will do stupid things, the taxpayer has to pay for these things because the consequences if they don't are much worse than if they do pay a little tax for birth control. Do you want higher crime rates of the children she isn't going to raise properly going around breaking your car windows in the middle of the night and taking your personal belongings? There is a balance in society, not everyone is going to do the right thing. You are trying to be too idealistic, there will be crime if you do not keep unwanted children from being born.
-
She is entitled to it, deserves it because health care is a right. Part of health care being a right is woman's health that includes birth control.
You are a communist thug, a traitor, a madoff, a tyrant, an islamo nazi, and a ghetto parasite. Off yourself!
-
This is beyond a mere stupid girl, trying to screw without consequence on someone else's dime (again, a few trips to the free clinic would solve her so-called plight quickly; though, she may need to go there for other issues). This is a political ploy, to paint Obama's future opponent as someone who's going to take women's rights away. It's no mere coincidence that this is being done, as Obama's approval numbers among women have DROPPED considerably.
Here are some of the free clinics in DC.
http://yourstdhelp.com/district_of_columbia.html
And the reason she can't go there to stock up on jimmy hats, free of charge, no questions asked would be........
Obama is the president and candidate in 2012 for woman's rights, every polls shows that. Rick Santorum thinks it's ok for his wife to have an abortion, but nobody else.
-
Your are a communist thug, a traitor, a madoff, a tyrant, an islamo nazi, and a ghetto parasite. Off yourself!
No, your are a communist thug, a traitor, a madoff, a tyrant, an islamo nazi, and a ghetto parasite. Off yourself!
-
this stupid whore will never be hired after this stunt.
Nonsense.
She'll enter the system and work her way up to become a fantastically liberal judge one day, ensuring that all single mothers with five babies to five different guys continue to receive their U.S. Treasury issued SSI checks for each child.
-
what eats you guys up inside is that you know these laws are on the books, they are not going to be changed, and you will pay for her contraceptives.
The U.S. Senate voted Thursday to kill a controversial proposal pushed by Republicans that would have allowed employers to opt out of providing health care coverage they disagree with on moral grounds.
-
She is entitled to it, deserves it because health care is a right.
SAYS WHAT? The Constitution? NOPE!! The Bill of Rights? Sorry!!
Part of health care being a right is woman's health that includes birth control.
Hardly! What unspeakable calamity will befall this woman, if she can't sling coochie all over Georgetown?
Is she going to get the measles? The mumps? The bubonic plague?
Leprosy? Although with her whoring around campus, shouting "UNCLEAN!" (as lepers did, in ancient times) might not be such a bad idea.
With all that said, the reason she can't go to the free clinic would be........
-
She is entitled to it, deserves it because health care is a right.
"Entitled" is not synonomous with "deserving."
Since that elementary concept is over your head, I'll address your more current post.
...health care is a right.
Health care is not a right, it's a service that everyone who has pays for.
Part of health care being a right is woman's health that includes birth control.
Conversely, one can be healthy and celibate.
Look; you're here everyday and no worse for the wear.
-
Once more, I've been to Georgetown, which ain't but a hop, skip, and jump from the 'hood.
There is NO NEED to force a PRIVATE CATHOLIC SCHOOL to pay for this woman's fornicating without consequence. She's but a bus ride away from downtown, where she can load up on rubbers to her heart's content.
-
HOW CAN SOMEONE SUE FOR SLANDER WHEN IT WAS THE TRUTH
-
Obama is the president and candidate in 2012 for woman's rights, every polls shows that. Rick Santorum thinks it's ok for his wife to have an abortion, but nobody else.
You missed what I said entirely. Obama and his Democrat buddies ginned this mess up, because their support among women was DROPPING (primarily on economic issues). So, since he can't tout his record as justification for re-election, he goes into scare-tactic mode, claiming that opposition to taxpayers (especially at religious institutions) footing the bill for women screwing around is tanamount to taking away birth control and/or abortion pills.
Liberals talk that yak, "My body, my choice"! Conservatives say, "Your body, your choice....YOUR DIME!!".
It's funny how liberals ain't so liberal, when it comes to spending THEIR OWN MONEY on mess like this.
-
"Entitled" is not synonomous with "deserving."
Since that elementary concept is over your head, I'll address your more current post.
Health care is not a right, it's a service that everyone who has pays for.
Conversely, one can be healthy and celibate.
Look; you're here everyday and no worse for the wear.
health care is not a right yet...in the US, it is in most countries that are better than the US.
Paying for health care is a tragedy brought on by greedy capitalistic thinking.
-
You missed what I said entirely.
Shocker.
-
health care is not a right yet...in the US, it is in most countries that are better than the US.
Paying for health care is a tragedy brought on by greedy capitalistic thinking.
And, from where does the money for this "right" come?
-
Once more, I've been to Georgetown, which ain't but a hop, skip, and jump from the 'hood.
There is NO NEED to force a PRIVATE CATHOLIC SCHOOL to pay for this woman's fornicating without consequence. She's but a bus ride away from downtown, where she can load up on rubbers to her heart's content.
that is sexist then if free rubber's are available to the men, but free women's birth control is not available for the women, that is one reason Obama will win 2012.
-
health care is not a right yet...in the US, it is in most countries that are better than the US.
Paying for health care is a tragedy brought on by greedy capitalistic thinking.
NEWS FLASH!! There's (virtually) NOTHING FREE in this world. Someone is footing the bill, at some level.
Again, if certain political entities are so darn concerned about this, THEY CAN COUGH UP THE DOUGH and pay for it themselves.
-
You missed what I said entirely. Obama and his Democrat buddies ginned this mess up, because their support among women was DROPPING (primarily on economic issues). So, since he can't tout his record as justification for re-election, he goes into scare-tactic mode, claiming that opposition to taxpayers (especially at religious institutions) footing the bill for women screwing around is tanamount to taking away birth control and/or abortion pills.
Liberals talk that yak, "My body, my choice"! Conservatives say, "Your body, your choice....YOUR DIME!!".
It's funny how liberals ain't so liberal, when it comes to spending THEIR OWN MONEY on mess like this.
No conservatives want to outlaw these things, just look at what Rick Santorum wants!
And, from where does the money for this "right" come?
It comes from you and me, the working taxpayer, keeping our youth healthy.
What has ruined America is greed, you are so greedy about the tax you pay, but you pay the lowest tax out of most if not all the western countries.
-
No conservatives want to outlaw these things, just look at what Rick Santorum wants!
It comes from you and me, the working taxpayer, keeping our youth healthy.
I would spill pigs blood and spray you w holy water if ibmet you. You are a commie demon and thug.
-
that is sexist then if free rubber's are available to the men, but free women's birth control is not available for the women, that is one reason Obama will win 2012.
First, who said that rubbers are only available to men. Women carry rubbers for their male buddies to use (how many "safe sex" ads have we seen over the years, where the guy's ready to get busy and the woman pulls out a condoms. He refuses to wear it and the woman pushes him off?).
Besides, we're talking price here, not sexism. Unless I missed my guess, condoms are CHEAPER than birth control pills.
Furthermore, if this woman had half a clue, she'd know that there are STDs she can get THAT CONDOMS/PILLS CAN'T STOP (i.e. crabs, genital warts).
-
First, who said that rubbers are only available to men. Women carry rubbers for their male buddies to use (how many "safe sex" ads have we seen over the years, where the guy's ready to get busy and the woman pulls out a condoms. He refuses to wear it and the woman pushes him off?).
Besides, we're talking price here, not sexism. Unless I missed my guess, condoms are CHEAPER than birth control pills.
Furthermore, if this woman had half a clue, she'd know that there are STDs she can get THAT CONDOMS/PILLS CAN'T STOP (i.e. crabs, genital warts).
Rubbers are for men to use, women need a form of birth control for them to use as well, equal rights....
-
It comes from you and me, the working taxpayer, keeping our youth healthy.
Um...okay...then, you're still paying for the service.
Just like (brace yourself) people pay for it in America.
How, exactly, is that better?
-
Um...okay...then, you're still paying for the service.
Just like (brace yourself) people pay for it in America.
I love paying my taxes, it is my duty to my country, only a small gesture I could do, if I could afford it I would cut a check to voluntarily pay more tax.
-
health care is not a right yet...in the US, it is in most countries that are better than the US.
I'm curious, if healthcare is a right, does that mean you think that people should be forced to become doctors and nurses? And, since greedy capitalistic thinking is bad, should they be paid or be required to provide services gratis?
Paying for health care is a tragedy brought on by greedy capitalistic thinking.
Right, because doctors worked for free before the "greedy capitalistic thinking" set in, and then they stopped doing it. Do you even think about the nonsense you spout?
-
Um...okay...then, you're still paying for the service.
Just like (brace yourself) people pay for it in America.
How, exactly, is that better?
I love paying my taxes, it is my duty to my country, only a small gesture I could do, if I could afford it I would cut a check to voluntarily pay more tax.
Thank you for answering a question nobody asked.
Now, how is the service acquisition of your preferred health care system better than in the U.S.?
-
No conservatives want to outlaw these things, just look at what Rick Santorum wants!
It comes from you and me, the working taxpayer, keeping our youth healthy.
What has ruined America is greed, you are so greedy about the tax you pay, but you pay the lowest tax out of most if not all the western countries.
I'm greedy, because I don't to foot the bill for this hoochie's humping escapades? PLEASE!!!
What has ruined America is LAZY, IRRESPONSIBLE people like you, who think you're entitled to privileges without responsibilities and expect someone else to fund your foolishness.
What keeps our youth healthy is not engaging in stupid behavior, especially when they have neither the finances nor the maturity to deal with the consequences.
Here's a hint: If you don't want babies, it's wise not to engage in activities THAT MAKE BABIES. Folks like you don't quite grasp a simple concept: Sex isn't a form of recreation with the nasty side effect of producing children. It is THE PRIMARY METHOD that we create new life on this planet, which just happens to be quite pleasurable.
-
I love paying my taxes, it is my duty to my country, only a small gesture I could do, if I could afford it I would cut a check to voluntarily pay more tax.
Every little bit helps... Please send your checks to:
Gifts to the United States
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Credit Accounting Branch
3700 East-West Highway, Room 622D
Hyattsville, MD 20782
-
I'm curious, if healthcare is a right, does that mean you think that people should be forced to become doctors and nurses? And, since greedy capitalistic thinking is bad, should they be paid or be required to provide services gratis?
Right, because doctors worked for free before the "greedy capitalistic thinking" set in, and then they stopped doing it. Do you even think about the nonsense you spout?
No doctors and nurses existed before evil capitalism, people genuinely cared to help other people, they didn't care about the money aspect of it, America is ruined by greed as shown by your post. Why be a doctor if you don't get paid tons of money LOL, what crazy thinking.
They should be paid by the government not the patient, the patient has no obligation to pay for health care, again it is a basic human right.
-
Thank you for answering a question nobody asked.
Now, how is the service acquisition of your preferred health care system better than in the U.S.?
Government health care is much better and well organized than greedy insurance provided health care in the private sector that is corrupt with greed.
-
Rubbers are for men to use,
File that in the "DUH!!" category.
women need a form of birth control for them to use as well, equal rights....
One, women don't "need" a form of birth control, because they don't "NEED" to have sex. Again, what uspeakable calamity is going to befall this silly woman at Georgetown, if she can open her legs ad nauseum, for half the campus to access again?
Measles? Mumps? Rubella? The Plague?
The issue is birth control, and unless you BOMBED biology, she can't get pregnant WITHOUT A MAN. Plus, rubbers again are CHEAPER than birth control pills (and she's the one, all bent out of shape about cost). Let me guess! She has the "right" to get humped au naturel, too.
-
I'm greedy, because I don't to foot the bill for this hoochie's humping escapades? PLEASE!!!
What has ruined America is LAZY, IRRESPONSIBLE people like you, who think you're entitled to privileges without responsibilities and expect someone else to fund your foolishness.
What keeps our youth healthy is not engaging in stupid behavior, especially when they have neither the finances nor the maturity to deal with the consequences.
Here's a hint: If you don't want babies, it's wise not to engage in activities THAT MAKE BABIES. Folks like you don't quite grasp a simple concept: Sex isn't a form of recreation with the nasty side effect of producing children. It is THE PRIMARY METHOD that we create new life on this planet, which just happens to be quite pleasurable.
No what has ruined American is greed, simple as that. Have you seen wall street, corruption, terrible, banks corrupt, the workers just want to work and get a house to live in and a few meals a day.
-
No doctors and nurses existed before evil capitalism, people genuinely cared to help other people, they didn't care about the money aspect of it, America is ruined by greed as shown by your post. Why be a doctor if you don't get paid tons of money LOL, what crazy thinking.
They should be paid by the government not the patient, the patient has no obligation to pay for health care, again it is a basic human right.
I’m now going to stop reading your replies for fear that your idiocrasy will somehow permeate my brain via the supra-optico retino-hypothalamic tract.
-
File that in the "DUH!!" category.
One, women don't "need" a form of birth control, because they don't "NEED" to have sex. Again, what uspeakable calamity is going to befall this silly woman at Georgetown, if she can open her legs ad nauseum, for half the campus to access again?
Measles? Mumps? Rubella? The Plague?
The issue is birth control, and unless you BOMBED biology, she can't get pregnant WITHOUT A MAN. Plus, rubbers again are CHEAPER than birth control pills (and she's the one, all bent out of shape about cost). Let me guess! She has the "right" to get humped au naturel, too.
It comes down to womens rights, a woman should have the same rights as a man, if contraceptives are free for men, rubbers, then birth control for woman should be free to them, no matter the cost. Yes she should be able to have sex naturally, std care paid for by taxpayer to keep our youth healthy.
-
No doctors and nurses existed before evil capitalism, people genuinely cared to help other people, they didn't care about the money aspect of it, America is ruined by greed as shown by your post. Why be a doctor if you don't get paid tons of money LOL, what crazy thinking.
They should be paid by the government not the patient, the patient has no obligation to pay for health care, again it is a basic human right.
GET REAL!! The government pays pennies on the dollar, compared to the private sector. Some of the most advanced technologies in healthcare resulted from "evil capitalism", not from government.
Plus, nurses and doctors, back in the day, got paid from PRIVATE entities (some of which were religious institutions).
That's why, for example, virtually no private sector company will fund embryonic stem cell research. It costs too much and, to date, hasn't cured JACK. Other forms of stem cell research will get funded in the private sector all day long. There are cures to be had and $$$$ to be made.
-
No doctors and nurses existed before evil capitalism, people genuinely cared to help other people, they didn't care about the money aspect of it, America is ruined by greed as shown by your post. Why be a doctor if you don't get paid tons of money LOL, what crazy thinking.
Right, doctors just did it because they cared about people... and they got bread from the bakers who cared about people... and the bakers got flour from the mill owners who cared about people... and the mill owners got the grains from the growers who cared about people... and so on.
You live in a fantasy world, in a place called Happy-Land, in a gumdrop house on Lollipop Lane.
They should be paid by the government not the patient, the patient has no obligation to pay for health care, again it is a basic human right.
You can repeat that all you want; it doesn't make it true.
Again, I will ask you: if nobody wants to become a doctor, who will provide healthcare? You claim it's a basic human right. So who will force to become a doctor against his will (i.e. whose rights will you violate)?
And what other basic human rights can you name that require other people to perform a service?
-
GET REAL!! The government pays pennies on the dollar, compared to the private sector. Some of the most advanced technologies in healthcare resulted from "evil capitalism", not from government.
Plus, nurses and doctors, back in the day, got paid from PRIVATE entities (some of which were religious institutions).
That's why, for example, virtually no private sector company will fund embryonic stem cell research. It costs too much and, to date, hasn't cured JACK. Other forms of stem cell research will get funded in the private sector all day long. There are cures to be had and $$$$ to be made.
GREED is a word to sum up your post. Look at health care around other western nations, it is free. The working people pay tax for themselves and those who don't work to get free health care, it is the only common sense option.
-
That's why, for example, virtually no private sector company will fund embryonic stem cell research. It costs too much and, to date, hasn't cured JACK. Other forms of stem cell research will get funded in the private sector all day long.
Not entirely true - there are also significant concern about the legal framework and the potential for public backlash. No company wants to end up in Court, or to have a bunch of rabid pro-lifers camping outside its offices and generating a lot of bad publicity.
-
Right, doctors just did it because they cared about people... and they got bread from the bakers who cared about people... and the bakers got flour from the mill owners who cared about people... and the mill owners got the grains from the growers who cared about people... and so on.
You live in a fantasy world, in a place called Happy-Land, in a gumdrop house on Lollipop Lane.
You can repeat that all you want; it doesn't make it true.
Again, I will ask you: if nobody wants to become a doctor, who will provide healthcare? You claim it's a basic human right. So who will force to become a doctor against his will (i.e. whose rights will you violate)?
And what other basic human rights can you name that require other people to perform a service?
People will become doctors for the right reason if money is not involved. If it is a common job, people will be doctors with a passion for helping patients and we will have even better doctors than we have now!
-
It comes down to womens rights, a woman should have the same rights as a man, if contraceptives are free for men, rubbers, then birth control for woman should be free to them, no matter the cost. Yes she should be able to have sex naturally, std care paid for by taxpayer to keep our youth healthy.
WRONG!! If she wants to open her legs and have sex, then SHE DEALS WITH THE CONSEQUENCES. No one else should be on the hook for her stupid behavior.
She gets burned; that's her problem. She gets knocked up; that's her problem.
Rubbers are cheaper than pills, since she's the one all fired up about cost. Plus, even if pills were free, the place to get them would be the "FREE CLINIC", NOT a Catholic university.
For the nth time, WHAT IS STOPPING THIS WOMAN from taking that ride downtown to the free clinic to get rubbers and/or pills?
-
GREED is a word to sum up your post. Look at health care around other western nations, it is free. The working people pay tax for themselves and those who don't work to get free health care, it is the only common sense option.
You're changing things around. You're now saying it's common sense. Which is it? A basic right, or common sense?
-
No what has ruined American is greed, simple as that. Have you seen wall street, corruption, terrible, banks corrupt, the workers just want to work and get a house to live in and a few meals a day.
Have you seen the corruption and greed from the very liberal politicians you keep heralding (i.e. Obama, Waters, Rangel, Kerry, Pelosi, Frank, Dodd, Reid, et. al.), many of them in bed with the very same Wall Street folks?
-
People will become doctors for the right reason if money is not involved. If it is a common job, people will be doctors with a passion for helping patients and we will have even better doctors than we have now!
Right... because doctors don't want to own a house, have a car, be able to take vacations, spoil their children or do any of the other things that people commonly want to do.
Face it, doctors -- and all people -- have always charged for their services and got paid -- in currency or in kind.
-
GREED is a word to sum up your post. Look at health care around other western nations, it is free. The working people pay tax for themselves and those who don't work to get free health care, it is the only common sense option.
Yet, when some of the LEADERS of these nations have their health on the line, guess where they come for treatment....HERE, in the USA!!
And many of those nations with "free" health care have gone BANKRUPT, as we've seen time and time again.
-
People will become doctors for the right reason if money is not involved. If it is a common job, people will be doctors with a passion for helping patients and we will have even better doctors than we have now!
Have you ever lived in a communist country, and expirienced communist health care?
-
Once again, RF20, what's stopping this woman from heading to the free clinics to load up on jimmy hats?
Or what calamity will befall this woman, if she can't spread her legs hither, thither and yon? Are her vaginal lips going to sprout wings and fly away?
-
I've answered these questions so many times already, equal rights, if men get free rubber for their birth control, women should get free pills for their birth control, equal rights...just like gay marriage, equal rights, in time everything will even out and be great in this country. The taxpayer needs to take responsibility and stop complaining and give up the money.
-
I've answered these questions so many times already, equal rights, if men get free rubber for their birth control, women should get free pills for their birth control, equal rights...just like gay marriage, equal rights, in time everything will even out and be great in this country. The taxpayer needs to take responsibility and stop complaining and give up the money.
You are a vile communist, a thug, a mini-jihadi, and belong at the bottom of the ocean eaten by eels.
-
You are a vile communist, a thug, a mini-jihadi, and belong at the bottom of the ocean eaten by eels.
hey at least you came up with new material, good post my man.
-
I've answered these questions so many times already, equal rights, if men get free rubber for their birth control, women should get free pills for their birth control, equal rights...just like gay marriage, equal rights, in time everything will even out and be great in this country. The taxpayer needs to take responsibility and stop complaining and give up the money.
You know... you talk and talk about how healthcare is a "right" and people shouldn't have to pay for it. Food is, in a sense, more fundamental than healthcare. So do you also consider "food" a "right", and do you think that we should foot the bills for lobster tails and filet mignons for everyone? I mean, healthcare won't help people who die from hunger.
And by extension, what don't you consider a right, under your twisted viewpoint? Shouldn't people be entitled to a free house? If for no other reason, to help safeguard their right to health: after all, they might get sick sleeping outside.
-
You know... you talk and talk about how healthcare is a "right" and people shouldn't have to pay for it. Food is, in a sense, more fundamental than healthcare. So do you also consider "food" a "right", and do you think that we should foot the bills for lobster tails and filet mignons for everyone? I mean, healthcare won't help people who die from hunger.
And by extension, what don't you consider a right, under your twisted viewpoint? Shouldn't people be entitled to a free house? If for no other reason, to help safeguard their right to health: after all, they might get sick sleeping outside.
good post.
Yes Food is a right that is why we have food stamps. Having a house is and should be a right soon, section 8 housing is very affordable, but not free, they still need to make the next step. We need to be a humane species, not barbaric and not care for our fellow human beings in this country.
-
good post.
Yes Food is a right that is why we have food stamps. Having a house is and should be a right soon, section 8 housing is very affordable, but not free, they still need to make the next step. We need to be a humane species, not barbaric and not care for our fellow human beings in this country.
LOL... I am now convinced you are a troll - nobody can be that stupid and evil.
-
No, but liberals would try anything to get a buck as long as it doesn't involve work.
LOL, that was funny. ;D
-
I've answered these questions so many times already, equal rights, if men get free rubber for their birth control, women should get free pills for their birth control, equal rights...just like gay marriage, equal rights, in time everything will even out and be great in this country. The taxpayer needs to take responsibility and stop complaining and give up the money.
No, you haven't answered them. What I asked was:
What's stopping this woman from heading to the free clinics to load up on jimmy hats?
Or what calamity will befall this woman, if she can't spread her legs hither, thither and yon? Are her vaginal lips going to sprout wings and fly away?
I didn't ask you what you THINK is a so-called right. As far as responsibility goes, that fall on this woman. If she wants to screw, then SHE (not the taxpayers) must pay the price for her contraception, or find a way to get such that puts no burden on taxpayers.
-
good post.
Yes Food is a right that is why we have food stamps. Having a house is and should be a right soon, section 8 housing is very affordable, but not free, they still need to make the next step. We need to be a humane species, not barbaric and not care for our fellow human beings in this country.
And from where did you dredge this imaginary drivel? What document said food is a right again?
-
Sandra Fluke Receives Call From Obama After Rush Limbaugh 'Slut' Comments
The Huffington Post Sam Stein
First Posted: 03/ 2/2012 1:20 pm Updated: 03/ 2/2012 1:29 pm
President Obama on Friday placed a call to Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown University law school student at the heart of the debate over the contraception law, thanking her for speaking out on the issue.
The call came a day after conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh demanded that Fluke release tapes of her having sex in exchange for the contraception that she argued should be covered by employers. Fluke was set to go on MSNBC's Andrea Mitchell Reports when the president rang her on her phone. She took the call while waiting in the green room.
"He encouraged me and supported me and thanked me for speaking out about the concerns of American women," she told Mitchell, who received permission from the White House to discuss the exchange between Fluke and Obama. "What was really personal for me was that he said to tell my parents that they should be proud. And that meant a lot because Rush Limbaugh questioned whether or not my family would be proud of me. So I just appreciated that very much."
Fluke appeared to be choking up a bit while recalling the conversation. But she composed herself and went to discuss how surreal her experience has been. After being declined the opportunity to speak on a congressional panel to debate the president's contraception rule, she was subsequently invited to address Democrats on the topic. For that, she was vilified by Limbaugh, who also compared her to a prostitute. On Friday, several leading Republicans, including House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), condemned the remarks. The call from the president put a capstone on the week.
"He did express his concern for me and wanted to make sure that I was ok, which I am," she said. "I'm ok."
UPDATE -- 1:29 p.m.: At the White House press briefing shortly after the news broke, Press Secretary Jay Carney outlined the reasoning behind the president's decision to call Fluke.
Obama, said Carney, felt that, "the kinds of personal attacks that have been directed her way have been inappropriate."
"The fact that our political discourse has been debased in many ways is bad enough," he added. "It's even worse when it is directed at a private citizen who is simply expressing her views about public policy."
________________________ __________
LMFAO!!!!
-
No, you haven't answered them. What I asked was:
What's stopping this woman from heading to the free clinics to load up on jimmy hats?
Or what calamity will befall this woman, if she can't spread her legs hither, thither and yon? Are her vaginal lips going to sprout wings and fly away?
I didn't ask you what you THINK is a so-called right. As far as responsibility goes, that fall on this woman. If she wants to screw, then SHE (not the taxpayers) must pay the price for her contraception, or find a way to get such that puts no burden on taxpayers.
you and your war against woman and woman's rights, right up the republican alley and out the door in this coming election, house, senate, president, democrat.
-
Stunner. Georgetown “Coed” Sandra Fluke Is a 30 Year-Old Women’s Rights Activist
TheGatewayPundit.com ^ | March 2, 2012 | Jim Hoft
Posted on Friday, March 02, 2012
What a shock! It was all a BIG PRODUCTION! The Democrat’s token abused college coed is actually a 30 year-old hardcore women’s rights activist.
Sandra Fluke is also the past president of Law Students for Reproductive Justice.
(video)
Jammie Wearing Fool reported:
"I put that in quotes because in the beginning she was described as a Georgetown law student. It was then revealed that prior to attending Georgetown she was an active women’s right advocate. In one of her first interviews she is quoted as talking about how she reviewed Georgetown’s insurance policy prior to committing to attend, and seeing that it didn’t cover contraceptive services, she decided to attend with the express purpose of battling this policy. During this time, she was described as a 23-year-old coed. Magically, at the same time Congress is debating the forced coverage of contraception, she appears and is even brought to Capitol Hill to testify. This morning, in an interview with Matt Lauer on the Today show, it was revealed that she is 30 years old, NOT the 23 that had been reported all along.
In other words, folks, you are being played. She has been an activist all along and the Dems were just waiting for the appropriate time to play her."
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
-
JUST A QUESTION FOR THE LIBERALS CALLING FOR LIMBAUGH'S HEAD.....
HOW MANY TIMES HAS BILL MAHER MADE TASTELESS COMMENTS??
COULD MAHER GET SUED FOR THE MANY AWFUL THINGS HE HAS SAID??
-
you and your war against woman and woman's rights, right up the republican alley and out the door in this coming election, house, senate, president, democrat.
Cease with the left-wing canned catchphrases and answer the questions at hand. One more time:
What's stopping this woman from heading to the free clinics to load up on jimmy hats?
Or what calamity will befall this woman, if she can't spread her legs hither, thither and yon? Are her vaginal lips going to sprout wings and fly away?
As far as the election goes, you forget that your Democrat party is coming off the worst political beating in over 70 years. And from the looks of things, an encore performance is on tap.
And as 333386 just posted, this whole thing was a ruse, a political stunt by the Democrats to attempt to shore up their floundering numbers with women.
-
Cease with the left-wing canned catchphrases and answer the questions at hand. One more time:
What's stopping this woman from heading to the free clinics to load up on jimmy hats?
Or what calamity will befall this woman, if she can't spread her legs hither, thither and yon? Are her vaginal lips going to sprout wings and fly away?
As far as the election goes, you forget that your Democrat party is coming off the worst political beating in over 70 years. And from the looks of things, an encore performance is on tap.
And as 333386 just posted, this whole thing was a ruse, a political stunt by the Democrats to attempt to shore up their floundering numbers with women.
It comes down to womens rights, a woman should have the same rights as a man, if contraceptives are free for men, rubbers, then birth control for woman should be free to them, no matter the cost. Yes she should be able to have sex naturally, std care paid for by taxpayer to keep our youth healthy.
-
Should I pay for the goat you lay down w every night?
-
LOL... I am now convinced you are a troll - nobody can be that stupid and evil.
You're just now picking up on that?
I noticed he's toned it down a bit. Lately, many of his posts were becoming just so over the top that it was very obvious he is merely a sloppy, trolling gimmick.
Posts like in this thread are an improvement because you can almost believe someone is ignorant enough to believe in these views.
For that, I applaud him on a job well done.
-
Yes. The act of taking/receiving something for which you did not work/earn/pay is called theft.
Only a thief or a complete idiot would not agree with this statement.
you would be better off paying for your own police protection. the government is so foolish for thinking it knows better than you how to protect you from crime and violence. lets give back all that money we take from everybody for police and let them buy their own police protection. conservatism!!!! hoorah!!!!!
-
you would be better off paying for your own police protection. the government is so foolish for thinking it knows better than you how to protect you from crime and violence. lets give back all that money we take from everybody for police and let them buy their own police protection. conservatism!!!! hoorah!!!!!
I'm not sure how you extracted all of that from my statement, and nor do I care.
Enjoy your weekend.
-
Cease with the left-wing canned catchphrases and answer the questions at hand. One more time:
What's stopping this woman from heading to the free clinics to load up on jimmy hats?
Or what calamity will befall this woman, if she can't spread her legs hither, thither and yon? Are her vaginal lips going to sprout wings and fly away?
As far as the election goes, you forget that your Democrat party is coming off the worst political beating in over 70 years. And from the looks of things, an encore performance is on tap.
And as 333386 just posted, this whole thing was a ruse, a political stunt by the Democrats to attempt to shore up their floundering numbers with women.
2010 was a very different set of circumstances from today.
with the dow back to where it was before the financial crisis and eocnomic collapse, employers hiring all over the country, and housing prices on the way up.. Obama is sitting pretty. not to mention that during his entire first term obama has been under the radar, being a pragmatic president that didnt play politics and who worked hard to get things done for the country instead of keep his polling numbers high. republicans have dominated the political discourse for the past 4 years allowing much propaganda to go without rebuttal. now its campaign season and Obama is already starting to go back up in the polls. just wait untill he starts using the presidency to boost his popularity and play politics. this election is going to be won by a significant margin.
-
I'm not sure how you extracted all of that from my statement, and nor do I care.
Enjoy your weekend.
its the implication of your ideology broseph
-
its the implication of your ideology broseph
No, it's your implication of my ideology, and an inaccurately extrapolated one at that.
You overgeneralized my points to arrive at a specific, yet incorrect conclusion.
-
I think steroids are a right. It's not fair that some people have to suffer from low self esteem because some people are stronger and make them feel like tiny tits. furthermore, people should not have to labor endlessly in order to attain muscles. Just up the dosage... It will cost the tax payer, but the collective benefit is worth the cost.
Also, 40 acres and a pit bull for everyone
-
No, it's your implication of my ideology, and an inaccurately extrapolated one at that.
You overgeneralized my points to arrive at a specific, yet incorrect conclusion.
you just dont realize it
never said you actually thought that getting rid of police would be a good idea
i was throwing the implications of your line of reasoning into your face
if you argue that one shouldnt let the government provide services to theirself because it diminishes pride and self worth, or like many conservatives think that the free market always works better than government, then your argument can be pushed to every single government program and service. postal service, schools, police, courts, jails. when there are people willing to pay money to house to capture and contain criminals there will certainly be someone willing to provide that service. and people will only pay for it when the criminal is harmful enough to them so that they will labor to get them off the streets. and wouldnt you feel better about yourself if when your daughter got kidnapped you went out and found the kidnapper yourself rather than having some strangers do it for you ?
-
good post.
Yes Food is a right that is why we have food stamps. Having a house is and should be a right soon, section 8 housing is very affordable, but not free, they still need to make the next step. We need to be a humane species, not barbaric and not care for our fellow human beings in this country.
WRONG AGAIN!! Food stamps are given as a TEMPORARY AID, to get people back on their feet until they get a job and can buy their own food.
Caring for your fellow man doesn't mean subsidizing laziness. As the Good Book states, "If any man WOULD NOT WORK, neither should he EAT!"
Having a house is hardly a right. It's a privilege, one that shouldn't be given lightly. That's why we have the mortgage crisis now. Banks were being forced to give loans to people with abysmal credit, that they knew couldn't pay them back.
-
WRONG AGAIN!! Food stamps are given as a TEMPORARY AID, to get people back on their feet until they get a job and can buy their own food.
Caring for your fellow man doesn't mean subsidizing laziness. As the Good Book states, "If any man WOULD NOT WORK, neither should he EAT!"
Having a house is hardly a right. It's a privilege, one that shouldn't be given lightly. That's why we have the mortgage crisis now. Banks were being forced to give loans to people with abysmal credit, that they knew couldn't pay them back.
so you would have someone starve to death if they didnt go out and get food for themself?
funny you would reference that quote. its exactly what marx wrote in his communist manifesto. if you dont particpate in the communist economy, you dont benefit from it. no food no shelter no nothing.
banks werent forced to make those loans. they lobbied congress so they were able to.
-
so you would have someone starve to death if they didnt go out and get food for themself?
funny you would reference that quote. its exactly what marx wrote in his communist manifesto. if you dont particpate in the communist economy, you dont benefit from it. no food no shelter no nothing.
banks werent forced to make those loans. they lobbied congress so they were able to.
Everyone pay close attention to this braindead fagg.
This is the future of the United States if Osama gets a second term.
However, it is indisputable that Tbombz and the cast of lepers in this thread that agree with his idiotic worldview would have been more valuable to society as aborted fetuses. Maybe Osama can do some community outreach on getbig.com and make the case to the American people that actively promoting homosexuality, government sponsored contraception and forced sterilization are the only preventative avenues that are available to rid the human race of its most useless members.
-
Lol, Dongz... If only you knew how much you fucking INFURIATE me. I seriously want to kill when I read your post. ;D
-
you just dont realize it
never said you actually thought that getting rid of police would be a good idea
i was throwing the implications of your line of reasoning into your face
if you argue that one shouldnt let the government provide services to theirself because it diminishes pride and self worth, or like many conservatives think that the free market always works better than government, then your argument can be pushed to every single government program and service. postal service, schools, police, courts, jails. when there are people willing to pay money to house to capture and contain criminals there will certainly be someone willing to provide that service. and people will only pay for it when the criminal is harmful enough to them so that they will labor to get them off the streets. and wouldnt you feel better about yourself if when your daughter got kidnapped you went out and found the kidnapper yourself rather than having some strangers do it for you ?
Once again, you’ve failed.
“You just don’t realize it.”
The context of my post you chose to quote related to a "woman" receiving money from my tax dollars to purchase contraceptives when there is no need for this, as a multitude of other avenues exist for requisitioning such products.
I don’t mind paying taxes for public safety because it’s something EVERYONE benefits from, including me. The same holds for the post office, schools, police, and everything else included in your wrongfully accusatory post.
Again, you’ve extrapolated too far from the essence of my post, which demonstrates pure desperation on your part as you grasp at straws in trying to justify using my tax money for more government handouts that are not needed.
Police protection (your example) and providing free contraceptives (my example) are two completely different matters, and only a simpleton would make an argument for one by trying to compare the two.
This isn’t a debate over liberalism or conservatism.
It’s a debate over what’s right or wrong.
-
these issues are exactly why republicans will not have a chance to win the presidency in 2012, still living 20 - 50 years ago, it is 2012 now.
-
these issues are exactly why republicans will not have a chance to win the presidency in 2012, still living 20 - 50 years ago, it is 2012 now.
Lol. You communists said the same thing in 2010.
-
Lol. You communists said the same thing in 2010.
And, they got the lips slapped off their faces, then.
-
Once again, you’ve failed.
“You just don’t realize it.”
The context of my post you chose to quote related to a "woman" receiving money from my tax dollars to purchase contraceptives when there is no need for this, as a multitude of other avenues exist for requisitioning such products.
I don’t mind paying taxes for public safety because it’s something EVERYONE benefits from, including me. The same holds for the post office, schools, police, and everything else included in your wrongfully accusatory post.
contraception is a wise investment. in the long run it will decrease government expenditures by way of reducing the costs associated with childbirth and child rearing that the government will have to spend if contraception isnt used. everyone benefits from reduced tax liability.
Again, you’ve extrapolated too far from the essence of my post, which demonstrates pure desperation on your part as you grasp at straws in trying to justify using my tax money for more government handouts that are not needed.
Police protection (your example) and providing free contraceptives (my example) are two completely different matters, and only a simpleton would make an argument for one by trying to compare the two.
make an argument against contraception that doesnt extend into other areas of governance then. your the one using arguments which shape an wide reaching ideology instead of just a position on a single issue.
This isn’t a debate over liberalism or conservatism.
It’s a debate over what’s right or wrong.
::)
-
They really need to have a Fluke amendment to the constitution awarding free birth control to all women.
Also while there at it, make anybody that makes over 250,000+ a year have a tattoo on their left wrist, thus when making purchases they have to pay double. Also for credit card purchases have their card flag and have them pay double their as well. Of course tax them double as much too. You would hear a lot less about inequality then, the money that get's taxed and collected from the rich for purchases goes into the paychecks of people making under $100,000 a year on a monthly basis.
-
They really need to have a Fluke amendment to the constitution awarding free birth control to all women.
Also while there at it, make anybody that makes over 250,000+ a year have a tattoo on their left wrist, thus when making purchases they have to pay double. Also for credit card purchases have their card flag and have them pay double their as well. Of course tax them double as much too. You would hear a lot less about inequality then, the money that get's taxed and collected from the rich for purchases goes into the paychecks of people making under $100,000 a year on a monthly basis.
And what if they lose their job idiot and make nothing the next year you communist traitor and pigs blood filled jihadi?
-
The act of taking/receiving something for which you did not work/earn/pay is called theft.
Only a thief or a complete idiot would not agree with this statement.
contraception is a wise investment. in the long run it will decrease government expenditures by way of reducing the costs associated with childbirth and child rearing that the government will have to spend if contraception isnt used. everyone benefits from reduced tax liability.
…make an argument against contraception that doesnt extend into other areas of governance then.
So far, you’ve tried to suggest failure of my original statement by applying it to the postal service, schools, police, courts, jails, etc., and I’ve patiently explained how and why each of those cases does NOT apply to my statement.
In favor of continuity, I will now do the same with your latest post that I’ve documented above.
You’re young, so I can somewhat understand why you've got a bit of an unrealistic, utopian view of the world.
Unfortunately, the way things work in real life is that there is a LARGE population of single mothers who receive something called SSI checks for each child they birth and rear. I had the misfortune of knowing a sampling of this demographic from my brief time working at a bank in a lower-class section of town. Most of these “women” pop out kids for the government money, and from hearing many of them talk, the majority of that money does NOT go towards raising their children.
Now, this is where the flaw lays in your argument: so long as the U.S. Treasury prints and distributes those SSI checks for each kid, then making babies is a source of income for many of these dirt bags. Do you honestly believe people like this will practice birth control in favor of their SSI income?
Allocating tax money for contraceptives using your logic is counterproductive because the targeted sector you claim “should” use them won’t…unless maybe the government caps the number of children for which one can receive govt. assistance checks. Instead, it is a rewards system for increasing the size of a family they can not afford to raise.
Currently, throwing tax money into a contraceptive program will not curb the population growth of children the government has to support with tax money. As for women who are not in the business of making babies, they can afford birth control - whether they work, and/or receive govt. assistance - provided they live within their means as the rest of us are required to do.
your the one using arguments which shape an wide reaching ideology instead of just a position on a single issue.
“Your” the one trying to apply my argument to issues to which they do not pertain in a dire attempt to somehow prove my statement is wrong.
Once more: Receiving something you did not earn and do not deserve is called theft.
Take that statement at face value, but don’t be so foolish as to try applying it to issues it doesn’t fit.
-
They really need to have a Fluke amendment to the constitution awarding free birth control to all women.
Also while there at it, make anybody that makes over 250,000+ a year have a tattoo on their left wrist, thus when making purchases they have to pay double. Also for credit card purchases have their card flag and have them pay double their as well. Of course tax them double as much too. You would hear a lot less about inequality then, the money that get's taxed and collected from the rich for purchases goes into the paychecks of people making under $100,000 a year on a monthly basis.
This is grade-A STUPIDITY, pure and simple.
You aren't entitled to someone else's money. Half the people in this country pay ZILCH in federal income taxes, which is ludicrous. Just because someone else has to flip burgers for a living, because he didn't bother getting a proper education doesn't mean another citizen has to foot their bills.
Life does NOT guarantee income equality for anyone. An engineer doesn't need to share his income with a bus boy. A IT specialist doesn't get his income bilked to fund someone frying fish.
-
Everyone pay close attention to this braindead fagg.
This is the future of the United States if Osama gets a second term.
However, it is indisputable that Tbombz and the cast of lepers in this thread that agree with his idiotic worldview would have been more valuable to society as aborted fetuses. Maybe Osama can do some community outreach on getbig.com and make the case to the American people that actively promoting homosexuality, government sponsored contraception and forced sterilization are the only preventative avenues that are available to rid the human race of its most useless members.
Bump
-
This is grade-A STUPIDITY, pure and simple.
You aren't entitled to someone else's money. Half the people in this country pay ZILCH in federal income taxes, which is ludicrous. Just because someone else has to flip burgers for a living, because he didn't bother getting a proper education doesn't mean another citizen has to foot their bills.
Life does NOT guarantee income equality for anyone. An engineer doesn't need to share his income with a bus boy. A IT specialist doesn't get his income bilked to fund someone frying fish.
that is a complete lie and you know it.
-
reppingfor20 is a kind of malicious troll.
He doesn't really believe in equality for women; he's just trying to cause disruption because fundamentally he hates the west.
He's just using the same tactics as the social marxist in the 60s. The main idea is for the west to go down and that's what's driving him.
This equality bullshit is just a front.
-
reppingfor20 is a kind of malicious troll.
He doesn't really believe in equality for women; he's just trying to cause disruption because fundamentally he hates the west.
He's just using the same tactics as the social marxist in the 60s. The main idea is for the west to go down and that's what's driving him.
This equality bullshit is just a front.
I think that he just hates himself and the rest of the world because his mother did not have him aborted when she had the chance. Now he spends his free time on getbig.com pretending to be a Palestinian Muslim that supports contraceptive rights for women that want to have as much unmarried sex as possible without getting pregnant. Even for a lame gimmick, that contradiction is a bit much.
-
So far, you’ve tried to suggest failure of my original statement by applying it to the postal service, schools, police, courts, jails, etc., and I’ve patiently explained how and why each of those cases does NOT apply to my statement.
In favor of continuity, I will now do the same with your latest post that I’ve documented above.
You’re young, so I can somewhat understand why you've got a bit of an unrealistic, utopian view of the world.
Unfortunately, the way things work in real life is that there is a LARGE population of single mothers who receive something called SSI checks for each child they birth and rear. I had the misfortune of knowing a sampling of this demographic from my brief time working at a bank in a lower-class section of town. Most of these “women” pop out kids for the government money, and from hearing many of them talk, the majority of that money does NOT go towards raising their children.
Now, this is where the flaw lays in your argument: so long as the U.S. Treasury prints and distributes those SSI checks for each kid, then making babies is a source of income for many of these dirt bags. Do you honestly believe people like this will practice birth control in favor of their SSI income?
Allocating tax money for contraceptives using your logic is counterproductive because the targeted sector you claim “should” use them won’t…unless maybe the government caps the number of children for which one can receive govt. assistance checks. Instead, it is a rewards system for increasing the size of a family they can not afford to raise.
Currently, throwing tax money into a contraceptive program will not curb the population growth of children the government has to support with tax money. As for women who are not in the business of making babies, they can afford birth control - whether they work, and/or receive govt. assistance - provided they live within their means as the rest of us are required to do.
“Your” the one trying to apply my argument to issues to which they do not pertain in a dire attempt to somehow prove my statement is wrong.
Once more: Receiving something you did not earn and do not deserve is called theft.
Take that statement at face value, but don’t be so foolish as to try applying it to issues it doesn’t fit.
1) you never addressed why those government programs dont apply to your original statement
2) you said it was misfortunate that you had to experience being around poor people
3) even if 90% of women didnt use the contraception and ended up with an unwanted pregnancy... and only 10% used the contraception.. the compensation by way of decreased health care costs associated with child birth would probably still be significant enough to make the financing of the program a non-issue.
4) you said that any woman who doesnt scam the child welfare system is able to buy birth control. what if they werent? would that change your mind? (btw, with that comment you just said that every poor woman in america is scamming the child welfare system. lol )
5)"Once more: Receiving something you did not earn and do not deserve is called theft.
Take that statement at face value, but don’t be so foolish as to try applying it to issues it doesn’t fit.
"
your statement is presented as a universal axiom. if you wish to ammend your comment to comething that makes it issue-specific you ought including wording as such.
-
1) you never addressed why those government programs dont apply to your original statement
Yes I did. Go back and read my post. The reason I don’t mind my tax money going towards services such as school, public safety, etc. is that I am receiving services for my money - quite the opposite of a contraception program from which I gain nothing.
2) you said it was misfortunate that you had to experience being around poor people
My point is that I had the misfortune of learning how a large percentage of SSI money is misspent by “poor” single mothers who receive it.
3) even if 90% of women didnt use the contraception and ended up with an unwanted pregnancy... and only 10% used the contraception.. the compensation by way of decreased health care costs associated with child birth would probably still be significant enough to make the financing of the program a non-issue.
Coming from someone with your reasoning skills and attention to detail, I need a little more reassurance than “probably.” Regardless, this is pure conjecture on your part.
4) you said that any woman who doesnt scam the child welfare system is able to buy birth control. what if they werent? would that change your mind? (btw, with that comment you just said that every poor woman in america is scamming the child welfare system. lol )
Instead of inferring words I did not type, try reading the ones I did.
Again, I’m not sure how you derived that notion from my quote. I‘ve included it below in the event you‘d like to take another crack at it:
“As for women who are not in the business of making babies, they can afford birth control - whether they work, and/or receive govt. assistance - provided they live within their means as the rest of us are required to do.”
5)""
""
Whatever the f*ck that means. ::)
your statement is presented as a universal axiom. if you wish to ammend your comment to comething that makes it issue-specific you ought including wording as such.
I never once thought someone would be foolish enough to try using it as a universal axiom to answer every issue in the universe. I’m not sure if you’re unable to comprehend the ideas, or if you simply spin them because you’re unable to directly refute them.
Either way, it wonderfully illustrates your lack of political acumen.
Finally, as you clearly make little to no attempt to bother actually reading or comprehending the points I compose, this will be the last of your posts I dignify with a response.
-
:)
-
LOL!!!
Well done.
-
1) you never addressed why those government programs dont apply to your original statement
Yes I did. Go back and read my post. The reason I don’t mind my tax money going towards services such as school, public safety, etc. is that I am receiving services for my money - quite the opposite of a contraception program from which I gain nothing.
the implications of such an ideology are far reaching and would result in an extremely complicated tax system or an extremely underdeveloped government.
you said that any woman who doesnt scam the child welfare system is able to buy birth control. what if they werent? would that change your mind? (btw, with that comment you just said that every poor woman in america is scamming the child welfare system. lol ).
Instead of inferring words I did not type, try reading the ones I did.
Again, I’m not sure how you derived that notion from my quote. I‘ve included it below in the event you‘d like to take another crack at it:
“As for women who are not in the business of making babies, they can afford birth control - whether they work, and/or receive govt. assistance - provided they live within their means as the rest of us are required to do.” .
poor people cant afford birth control regardless of how well they budget. since , by your statement, everyone who doesnt scam the system can afford birth control with the right budgeting, then ipso facto all poor women are scamming the system.
-
the republicans were awefully stupid in the way they wrote their bil, allowing an institution to opt out of ANY part of the healthcare plans they had a moral objection to.
they should have just stuck to birth control. that may have even passed.
-
this all doesn't really matter, the tea party has screwed the republican's out of the house and also made sure they have no chance at the presidency in 2012.
After that, all the bills you conservatives are bitching about will go through lightning fast along with tax hikes, no need to even address your outdated thoughts anymore then.
-
Rush Limbaugh Doubles Down On Sandra Fluke, Offering ‘As Much Aspirin to Put Between Her Knees As She Wants’
The conservative radio host continued: “What does it say about the college co-ed Sandra Fluke, who goes before a congressional committee and essentially says that she must be paid to have sex, what does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception. She wants you and me and the taxpayers to pay her to have sex. What does that make us? We’re the pimps.”
Fox News said that if she doesn't have a lawyer now, she will by tomorrow mourning to sue him, they said she could even sue him for $$$ for what he said and they said he went over the line, fox news said this on their tv show.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/03/rush-limbaugh-sandra-fluke-a-slut-and-prostitute/
Is telling the truth an offence in America now? Shocking country where the truth will get you shot down in flames - In my experience people prefer to be lied too! Not me! But just it seems the average citizen is happy to have a head full of lies and propoganda.
-
More Limbaugh stations, advertisers jump ship
Pittsfield, Massachusetts radio station 1420 AM WBEC, one of hundreds of stations nationwide that carry "The Rush Limbaugh Show," dropped the program from its lineup, according to station general manager Peter Barry. He said the decision was made Monday, and was based upon comments Limbaugh made last week regarding Georgetown law student Sandra Fluke, "which we found unacceptable."
On Monday, KPUA, a radio station in Hilo, Hawaii announced it would no longer carry the radio program, effective immediately.
On Monday, AOL joined 11 other companies announcing they were removing ads from "The Rush Limbaugh Show," which is the most listened to talk radio show in the United States.
Other sponsors dropping spots from Limbaugh's show include mattress companies like Sleep Number and The Sleep Train, and companies that assist small businesses like Citrix, LegalZoom and QuickenLoans.
One company, Carbonite, a data backup service, said feedback from customers led to the decision to remove advertising from Limbaugh's show. The company's CEO said Limbaugh's apology Saturday wasn't enough to put his company's ads back on the air.
(http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q266/phenry1970/dkos/bouncy.gif)
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/06/more-limbaugh-stations-advertisers-jump-ship/?hpt=hp_t3
-
:D
-
That's the problem with this country. What ever happend to the first amendment. Pussiefied liberal want to sue for everything. Fucken nanny state.
I know right.. you cant even say Retard on a cartoon show without some people getting their panties in a bunch
-
I know right.. you cant even say Retard on a cartoon show without some people getting their panties in a bunch
It's 2012, evolve with the times, become a progressive or else you will be left in the dust cleaning up the scrapes on the side of the road :)
-
It's 2012, evolve with the times, become a progressive or else you will be left in the dust cleaning up the scrapes on the side of the road :)
progressive = Communist
-
;D
-
;)
-
I know right.. you cant even say Retard on a cartoon show without some people getting their panties in a bunch
-
Really? Obama got away w making fun of special olympics bowlers and he got a pass.
-
She says it costs thousands of dollars a month for birth control ::) How much sex is this fat slut having? Fucken gimme mentality of these people. I can understand being upset with the insurance company for not covering certain things but this is not reasonable.
the amount of birth control is not dependent on the amount of sex, the dose is the same, are you teh retarded.
-
the amount of birth control is not dependent on the amount of sex, the dose is the same, are you teh retarded.
good post
-
good post
I fucking know it is, What do the repubs think theres a semen level per pill, that higher doses are required for more semen, are they even aware of what the pill does?
its like a man complaining of having low test as such he cannot have erections nor sex not that he would want to. The treatment for this is test replacement therapy, now he can have sex etc but without it cannot, tax money goes to that, is he a whore? analogy applies to this situation, the pill is a mixture of hormones, sometimes singular sometimes estrogen and progesterone derivatives, it changes the wall of the endometrium such that implantation is difficult and to get the old mittleschremz corrected.
It's honestly absurd that people support what he has said, i get the message he is making but its a complete red herring and has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
the only reason a dose could be increased is if she has pcos, acne etc... a medical condition, she is not buying it for sex, it has no effect on number of partners hence she isn't a whore, all the comments from the right indicate is that you have a group of fucking idiots listening to a fat retarded megalomaniac.
-
I fucking know it is, What do the repubs think theres a semen level per pill, that higher doses are required for more semen, are they even aware of what the pill does?
its like a man complaining of having low test as such he cannot have erections nor sex not that he would want to. The treatment for this is test replacement therapy, now he can have sex etc but without it cannot, tax money goes to that, is he a whore? analogy applies to this situation, the pill is a mixture of hormones, sometimes singular sometimes estrogen and progesterone derivatives, it changes the wall of the endometrium such that implantation is difficult and to get the old mittleschremz corrected.
It's honestly absurd that people support what he has said, i get the message he is making but its a complete red herring and has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
the only reason a dose could be increased is if she has pcos, acne etc... a medical condition, she is not buying it for sex, it has no effect on number of partners hence she isn't a whore, all the comments from the right indicate is that you have a group of fucking idiots listening to a fat retarded megalomaniac.
boooom, another great post, thank you for explaining it out for the conservatives who get their "facts" from fox news and talk radio :)
-
boooom, another great post, thank you for explaining it out for the conservatives who get their "facts" from fox news and talk radio :)
are you asking me if im on the pill so you can fuck me? my aids is flared.