33, please 'refudiate' this.
Big deal 1 point.
Big deal 1 point.
Well, its 2 points and its rising in Ras along with every other poll. Rasmussen even has his approval rate at 50%
Big deal 1 point.
I still fail to understand why some seem to put to much importance on polls. They sample about .0000000003% of the population, yet that is irrefutable evidence that Obama will win re-elections ::)This.
This.I wouldn't say they are pointless but your skepticism is warranted
Polls are fucking pointless IMHO.
Remember your comment about Rasmussen being the only honest poll....well they have Obama leading by 1 and he's pulling away in battleground states from Romney
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
Three months later (as more economic bad news hit), he was in the 30s.
His lead is within the margin of error, Vince. That means, effectively, it's a tie.
And, as had been explained several times before not, you have the undecided voters, nearly all of which tend to go AGAINST the incumbent.
If Obama is up 46-44 in Rasmussen, what happens with that 10% of undecideds? If he's up 47-44 against Romney in Gallup, what happens to the 9% of undecideds?
Let's not forget also that Obama got a huge bump in the polls, last year, after Bin Laden got killed. Three months later (as more economic bad news hit), he was in the 30s.
he was at 39% for 5 minutes before bouncing back up over 50?
This is hardly unprecedented....The first George Bush was at over 70% after the Gulf War....yet he took a similar plummet as well when the economy went sour........
nice try though
Thank you for making my point. The tanking economy DROPPED Obama's numbers after Bin Laden got killed. And further economic woes will flatten this bump (far less than the one he got last year), based on ObamaCare.
I can see your point...but it remains questionable whether Obamacare will make his numbers go down further....the Conservative Supreme Court gave Obama much-needed political cover on this issue....Obama will literally crush Romney on this point once the debates get started and Obama looks right at Romney and says "my healthcare plan is basically an exact copy of the one you implemented in Massachusetts"...Romney will shit himself and Obama will win on this point...
The economy is another story...Romney may have him on that
Obama doesn't have political cover. He campaigned on NOT RAISING taxes on the middle class. That was BS, based on ObamaCare, which we were saying years ago. What the Supreme Court just did was say (in a perverse way) that we were right.
As for the debates, don't bet on Obama destroying anybody. Santorum and Gingrich tried that same approach on Romney in the GOP debates. It didn't work. Plus, Romney now has a counter, clobbering Obama with his own campaign promise not to raise taxes on the middle class (at least 12 taxes in ObamaCare hike those up on people who make under $250,000).
if it is a tax its a tax that is earmarked to actually go to a certain program that will benefit all...not into the general coffers where who knows where it will go..the american people,will see that
if it is a tax its a tax that is earmarked to actually go to a certain program that will benefit all...not into the general coffers where who knows where it will go..the american people,will see that
So how is a mandate a tax now ?
What if Romney and the congress pass a law saying every american has to fly a confederate battle flag in their front yard or face a tax. Are you ok w that slave?
Obama will literally crush Romney on this point once the debates get started and Obama looks right at Romney and says "my healthcare plan is basically an exact copy of the one you implemented in Massachusetts"...Romney will shit himself and Obama will win on this point...
So how is a mandate a tax now ?
What if Romney and the congress pass a law saying every american has to fly a confederate battle flag in their front yard or face a tax. Are you ok w that slave?
They haven't seen that in THREE YEARS, Andre. The beating the Dems took in 2010 is proof of that.
Romney said it best. ObamaCare was bad law before Thursday; it's bad law NOW. Constitutional or not, it SUCKS!!!
You honestly think Obama and the Dems can do in four months, what they couldn't do in over three years, especially with the added burden of explaining that they've done what they swore they wouldn't do.
c'mon..flying a flag has nothing to do with interstate commerce
the beating the Dems took in the mid-term elections was due to a lot of issues converging at one time......Obama's birth certificate issue.....the healthcare debate.....the fact that the Repubs would not do anything to help the economy or the American people in any way whatsoever.....so nothing could get done and it was blamed on Obama...the economy......etc..also the tea party was well organized and galvanized
Wrong, that would guarantee the incontinence vote for Romney.
But seriously, you don't think they'll be incredibly prepared for this angle?
they can prepare all they want..there is no getting around it..it is what it is...Romney's healthcare bill preceded Obama's..unless Romney has a time machine you can't get around that....as for the incontinence vote (nice moniker), they are not going to vote against a bill that will potentially make sure they are taken care of...running on a platform of taking healthcare AWAY is not good business if you want the old folks vote
LOL. But deciding not to purchase something is?
You thugs supporting what roberts did have no idea the slavery you are endorsing.
Let me put it another way easier for you to understand , S L A V E , let's say Romney and the Congress force you to buy a gym membership and show proof you are exercising 5 times a week or face a "fat tax", are you ok with that - YES OR NO?
The mandate is not the only thing horrible about ObamaCare you dope!
dude for far too long, young people and others in this society have been living off our backs due to their not having insurance...when they get sick and go to the emergency room, who do you think pays for that???..and when they have to spend days or weeks in the hospital, where does that money come from to pay for it????.....
you are contradicting yourself because you are the one always railing about people getting shit for free off our backs..this bill will end that...youngsters and everyone else will now have to pay for insurance like the rest of us...you can't be that dumb not to see that?????????????????????????????????????????????????
That is hysterical, truly hysterical since illegals, who ghettobama refuses to boot out, are the biggest absuers of tghe ER, yet are thery going to buy insurance? NO!!!!
And if ThugCare were limited solely to the ER, fine, you can make that argument, but how many people run to the ER for free condoms and BC you jackass?
you goddamn idiot.....in terms of illegal aliens OBAMA HAS DEPORTED MORE THAN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT......DEPORTATI ONS SKYROCKETED UNDER OBAMA......and you know this you moron.....your arguments are getting more and more incoherent.....and while illegal aliens do often make use of the ER, Americans far and away use the ER more than they do...if anything they avoid doctors because they don't like too many questions asked and mostly use the ER for their children, many of whom are American born
So now Obama is going to force people to get checkups and go to the doctor?
I didn't hear about that being in the bill..but it is sound practice.....people should go to the doctor at least once every year or every two years just for a check-up and physical...this way, lots of preventable diseases can be caught and treated before they get out of control and cost even more
you goddamn idiot.....in terms of illegal aliens OBAMA HAS DEPORTED MORE THAN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT......DEPORTATI ONS SKYROCKETED UNDER OBAMA......and you know this you moron.....your arguments are getting more and more incoherent.....and while illegal aliens do often make use of the ER, Americans far and away use the ER more than they do...if anything they avoid doctors because they don't like too many questions asked and mostly use the ER for their children, many of whom are American born
the beating the Dems took in the mid-term elections was due to a lot of issues converging at one time......Obama's birth certificate issue.....the healthcare debate.....the fact that the Repubs would not do anything to help the economy or the American people in any way whatsoever.....so nothing could get done and it was blamed on Obama...the economy......etc..also the tea party was well organized and galvanized
They haven't seen that in THREE YEARS, Andre. The beating the Dems took in 2010 is proof of that.
Romney said it best. ObamaCare was bad law before Thursday; it's bad law NOW. Constitutional or not, it SUCKS!!!
You honestly think Obama and the Dems can do in four months, what they couldn't do in over three years, especially with the added burden of explaining that they've done what they swore they wouldn't do.
The healthcare debate is BACK, front and center. This time, the people get to see more of ObamaCare's warts.
What else do you want to force people to do?
Don't you see how hypocritical Romney is for saying its bad law when HE HIMSELF did the same thing>???..I don't care how you twist and turn Mcway you can't worm out of that!!!!!
but nothing has changed. ya know?
if you opposed obamacare, you still do. you were never part of the 48% supporting obama in polls.
what % of voters will say "nothing has changed with obamacare, but suddenly I go from supporting it, to being dead set against it"?
The lines were drawn long ago. it'll galvanize donations from those who were already anti-obama, sure. But who is going to change their vote because 'nothing has changed'?
Actually, idiot, that was proven to be complete bullshit and just a massaging of numbers. They consider any person turned away at the border to be a "deportation", regardless of whether they step foot in this country or not. When you remove that bullshit statistic, it turns out that deportations under Obama have decreased quite a bit.
Your arguments are fucking retarded and indicative of an uneducated moron who believes everything fed to him.
The answer is: Independents, working-class white voters, and some Obama voters who feel the siphoning of their wallets.
but the repubs aren't offering anything different, and they support probably 80% of obamacare, like "children cannot be refused" and "no rejection based upon pre-existing conditions".
And the mandate, that's a dead issue now.
So um, what exact parts of obamacare are repubs going to run against? indiv mandate isn't going anywhere, and no way they go after most of the parts.
They'll have ceremonial bullshit votes to waste money and give beck something to talk about - but really, it's over now.
how exactly are independents going to buy into that again?
once the GOP has an alternative.
Well, it's been how many decades now?
I'm not holding my breath on that one. Repubs like how it was - when healthy working slobs in their early 30s were paying 250 a month for health insurance.
once the GOP has an alternative.
Well, it's been how many decades now?
I'm not holding my breath on that one. Repubs like how it was - when healthy working slobs in their early 30s were paying 250 a month for health insurance.
The GOP doesn't need one. Nowhere does the loathing of ObamaCare hinge on the Republicans offering an alternative. The American people have said they want it gone.
Most people have said that they want a healthcare overall. They just don't think that the plan that OBama put out is the right one.
I am in agreement with them, but if most people are, in some way, sensible, then they do want "some" healthcare reform.
Indeed they do. But, nothing says ObamaCare has to stay, while that's being fleshed out.
Who fleshes that out?
The Republicans had 15 years to work it out... nothing.
but the repubs aren't offering anything different, and they support probably 80% of obamacare, like "children cannot be refused" and "no rejection based upon pre-existing conditions".
And the mandate, that's a dead issue now.
So um, what exact parts of obamacare are repubs going to run against? indiv mandate isn't going anywhere, and no way they go after most of the parts.
They'll have ceremonial bullshit votes to waste money and give beck something to talk about - but really, it's over now.
how exactly are independents going to buy into that again?
Remember your comment about Rasmussen being the only honest poll....well they have Obama leading by 1 and he's pulling away in battleground states from Romney
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
Rasmussen has Mitt Romney in the lead again, +2 over Obama)
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Well, that helps out a little.... ;D
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
Rasmussen has Mitt Romney in the lead again, +2 over Obama)
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
Or, as I said earlier, it's a DEAD HEAT!!
statistically, mittens manages to claim this. I dont know how profiting off dead babies will help this, however.
You must have him confused with Planned Parenthood.
And what does palnned parenthood have to do with dead babies?
look, mitt made a shitload of $$$$$$$$$$$ with a firm that disposed of dead babies. who cares, that was years ago.
Is Obama against abortion?
Most people have said that they want a healthcare overall. They just don't think that the plan that OBama put out is the right one.
I am in agreement with them, but if most people are, in some way, sensible, then they do want "some" healthcare reform.
Mcway caught in another lie
How are those Obama kneepads working for you?
working as well as your Romney-Cain-Palin-Newt kneepads
the trend has been very clear - and repubs are starting to notice too.
Mitt has an historic opportunity here. An incumbent in a great depression who shoved obamacare down throats.
yet he isn't gaining ground - he is (provably) losing ground now.
He is winning 51 - 43 in the swing states as of today.
Back to a clean sweep for Obama.
Ras up by three
Tied in gallup
Up in wash Times
Tied in ABC/WAPO poll in poll oversampled demos by 9 points.
Ras got Obama up and so does Gallup up by 3....
Learn 2 quote! You always fuck your quotes up and it pisses me off!
The sweep is back.....Obama leading in Ras and Gallup poll....guess the people wanna see those tax records
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
The sweep is back.....Obama leading in Ras and Gallup poll....guess the people wanna see those tax records
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
Do you even look at these links? There is no "clean sweep." This race is a dead heat. Given the margin of error, which is usually around 3 percent or so, they are tied.
The RCP average is 45.9 Obama, 44.8, Romney. That's a tie.
Rass is 46 Romney, 43 Obama. That's probably within the margin of error, so effectively a tie.
Gallup is 46 Obama, 45 Romney. A tie.
Fox is 45 Obama, 41 Romney. Might be just outside the margin of error.
CBS is 47 Romney, 46 Obama. A tie.
NPR is 47 Obama, 45 Romney. Another tie. Etc., etc.
In a tie situation.....Obama wins. Romney isn't pulling ahead and hasn't pulled ahead....
We already knew the election would be close but Obama has been on all accounts and if the election was held today, Obama would get 332 electoral votes to Romney's 212.....
Romney has to do better period or he is certain to lose
:). I think that once the polls start using only likley voters will we get a better picture, but if we get 5 more bad jobs reports as expected obama is done. His approval in the mid forties is terrible for an incumbent.
W only sqeeked by because he turned the wot into a positive for himself.
Obama has no issue to turn into a positive that voters will be thrilled about to give him four more years to destroy this country.
romney has lost his top 3 issues - DREAM, obamacare, and his busines experience to brag about.
what is he going to talk about now?
his wife's horse is going to be in the Olympics
I'm sure that will help him relate to middle american swing voters
romney has lost his top 3 issues - DREAM, obamacare, and his busines experience to brag about.
what is he going to talk about now?
Undecided Lean To Insurgent
With most current presidential polls of likely voters showing 9 percent to 10 percent undecided, the question of where the undecided votes go becomes of paramount importance.
To answer this question, I compared the final Gallup polls with the actual results in every race in which an incumbent president was opposing an insurgent since 1964. This included the Johnson-Goldwater race of 1964, the Nixon-McGovern race of 1972, the Carter-Ford race of 1976, the Reagan-Carter-Anderson race of 1980, the Reagan-Mondale race of 1984, the Clinton-Bush-Perot race of 1992, the Clinton-Dole race of 1996 and the Bush-Kerry race of 2004.
In these races, the undecided vote went heavily for the insurgent and the incumbent lost vote share between the final poll and the election, even when the incumbent was winning the contest easily overall. Six of eight presidents seeking reelection performed worse than the final Gallup poll predicted, while one finished the same (Reagan in 1984) and one gained votes (Bush in 2004). Seven of the nine insurgent candidates did better than the final Gallup survey predicted.
• In 1964, Johnson lost 3 points to Goldwater at the end.
• In 1972, Nixon lost 1 point to a third-party candidate.
• In 1976, there was a 4-point swing to Carter.
• In 1980, there was a 3-point swing to Reagan or Anderson.
• In 1984, there was no change between the final poll and the results.
• In 1992, there was a 1-point shift away from Bush. In that contest, there was also a 5-point swing away from Clinton to Perot at the end.
• In 1996, there was a 5-point swing away from Clinton and to Dole or Perot.
• Only Bush in 2004 ran better in the result than in the final poll, by 2 points.
In other words, of the total of 19 points that shifted between the final poll and the election results, 17 points or 89 percent went to the challenger.
The implications of these findings are that the current polls, while seemingly close, portend a strong Republican victory. The RealClearPolitics.com average of the past eight presidential horse race polls shows Obama with a 47-44 lead over Romney. But among likely voters, in the Rasmussen survey (all others were of either registered voters or adults), the president was running behind Romney by 48-44.
But given the historical fact that the final results are almost always worse for the president and almost never better, we really need to focus on the Obama vote share rather than his lead or lack of one against Romney. If Obama is, indeed, getting 44 percent of the vote, he is likely facing, at least, an 11-point loss. If he is getting 47 percent of the vote, he is looking, at least, at a 6-point defeat. (Given the fact that six of the eight incumbent presidents not only lost the undecided, but finished lower than the pre-election survey predicted, it would be more likely that Obama’s margin of defeat would be greater than even these numbers suggest.)
There are other indications of a Republican landslide in the offing. Party identification has moved a net of eight points toward the GOP since the last election. In Senate races, there are currently eight Democratic-held seats where Republicans are now leading either the Democratic incumbent or the Democratic candidate for the open seat.
The predictions of a close election are all based on polling of registered voters — not likely voters — and fail to account for the shift in votes against the incumbent that has been the norm of the past presidential contests.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/04/18/undecided_lean_to_insurgent_113883.html
All those Bain attacks have not helped Obama at all. What does Obama have left?
This election is for Romney to lose. He needs to stay away from making any stupid comments and continue to focus on the economy. Forget about the social issues. They will not determine the outcome of this election.
All those Bain attacks have not helped Obama at all. What does Obama have left?
This election is for Romney to lose. He needs to stay away from making any stupid comments and continue to focus on the economy. Forget about the social issues. They will not determine the outcome of this election.
I agree that Romney should win this election.....its his to lose....but social issues matter to women......Obama could sneak in a victory if white women overwhelmingly vote for him
What is he going to promise them/ Condoms and food stamps? He already did that?
What is he going to promise them/ Condoms and food stamps? He already did that?
Equal pay? Haha, just kidding as his office and the offices of other Dem politicians severely underpay their women employees.
you always pop into threads with the most ridiculous nonsense :(
Is Fury lying?
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/obama_administration/daily_presidential_tracking_poll
I'm no longer counting Ras since you ignore every other poll..... ;D
The sweep is back....
Cue all the meaningless ad...... ;D
Uh, no.
There are only three polls included in RCP from 2 to 8 August, and they show:
Romney 47, Obama 43 - Rassmussen
Obama 47, Romney 45 - Gallup
Obama 49, Romney 42 - Reuters
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
Reuters is worthless due to their ridiculous sampling models.
Ras and Gallup are the only two worthwhile at this point.
In addition to that, Romney will get the majority of the undecided votes, so as long as he's within striking distance or within the margin of error, he's effectively leading.
LOL - Ras was the most accurate in 2008 and the 2010 midterms moron.
Newser) – The latest poll from CNN has President Obama up 52% to 45% over Mitt Romney among registered voters. Some of the highlights:
•Obama leads among independent voters, 53%-42%.
•Romney's unfavorable rating jumped from 42% to 48% since July, while the president's remained steady at 42%.
•In good news for Romney, 56% of his voters say they "strongly support" him, up from 47% in May. Obama's current mark is 61%.
•In not-so-good news for Romney, the percentage of those who think he would right the economy has fallen from 50% in May to 45%
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/08/09/cnn-poll-obama-holds-7-point-lead-over-romney/
or if you don't like CNN let's look at the most recent Fox News poll of registered voters which has him up 9 points over Romney
Fox News poll: Obama's lead grows as Romney's support slips
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/08/09/fox-news-poll-obama-lead-grows-as-romney-support-slips/
The president would take 49 percent of the vote compared to Romney's 40 percent in a head-to-head matchup if the election were held today, the poll found. Last month, Obama had a four percentage-point edge of 45 percent to 41 percent. This marks the second time this year the president has had a lead outside the poll’s margin of sampling error.
Obama’s advantage comes largely from increased support among independents, who now pick him over Romney by 11 percentage points. Some 30 percent of independents are undecided. Last month, Obama had a four-point edge among independents, while Romney had the advantage from April through early June
here is the poll from Fox of registered voters:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2012/08/09/fox-news-poll-presidential-race/
Oversampled Democrats +9 - more crap polls.
give us the link because most on here believe nothing you say or post
You leftists are so fucking lazy and ignorant
________________________ ________________________ ____
POLITICAL IDENTIFICATION When you think about politics, do you think of yourself as a Democrat or a Republican? (Independent (Don’t know / Other) / Refused) 14 6 18 3 19 4 20 2 20 3 17 3 19 2 21 2 16 3 19 1
Democrat Republican 5-7 Aug 12 44 35 15-17 July 12 42 38 24-26 Jun 12 41 36 3-5 Jun 12 41 37 13-15 May 12 42 34 22-24 Apr 12 43 37 9-11 Apr 12 40 39 10-12 Mar 12 40 37 6-9 Feb 12 44 36 12-14 Jan 12 41 39
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/interactive/2012/08/09/fox-news-poll-presidential-race
Page 13 of this stupid poll
so you're ignoring the Independent and undecided
I thought the common wisdom from right wingers on this board is that the indepdents skewed toward to the right
The fact is that even in 2008 the Demos with historical turnout did not have +9 turnout.
This is more crap polling.
how about Dems + Independents?
Doesnt matter - again - you are an ignorant hack.
A few months ago when this same polling outfit sampled Demos at +4 it showed a 4 point adv for Obama.
In November no one even obama thinks Demos will be +9
I guess we'll find out in November just what % of Dems, Independents and Repubs show up and we'll also know by what % Obama beats Obama
that's unless of course your personal CT comes true and Obama steps down or is kicked off the ticket before then
Are you still hanging on to that absurd belief ?
Doesnt matter - again - you are an ignorant hack.
A few months ago when this same polling outfit sampled Demos at +4 it showed a 4 point adv for Obama.
In November no one even obama thinks Demos will be +9
it doesn' have to be by 9,all they have to do is just win baby;D
Gallup and Ras both have Romney up or tied.
The others are oversampling demos by stupid %.
I know that to typical leftist slaves and messianic dolts to Thulsa Doom that does not matter, but stay ignorant, lazy, and stupid, its fitting for you considering who you shill for.
(http://www.freakyts.com/siteimages/please%20wait%20attempting%20to%20give%20a%20fuck.jpg)
really,who gives a fuck what you think ;D
(http://www.freakyts.com/siteimages/please%20wait%20attempting%20to%20give%20a%20fuck.jpg)
Simple Jack - do you understand what sampling means for polls?
Simple Jack - do you understand what sampling means for polls?
dont worry 333 - all this polling will be moot when Obama drops out
should be any day now
go check out the electoral college ,shut-in ;D
it doesn' have to be by 9,all they have to do is just win baby;D
Hey - vince - go check out RCP today and meltdown
Even the Politico thread showing Obama +1 oversamples demos.
Not that I care but nothing has changed...electoral is still well in Obama's favor and he's winning 9 out of 10 swing states.
Lol. Keep buying in to that.
It hasn't dawned on Vince that, if they're oversampling Dems in the national polls, they may be doing the same in the EC polls as well
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/archive/2012_electoral_college_scoreboard
polls are like assholes, everyone has one and they usually stink ;D
so basicly he got shit for a bump for v.p announcement :D :D :D :D wooooow i'd be happy
LOL - only up up up and away from here.
been saying that for weeks still nothing,200 million a day ring a bell, romney can't even pull a lead on a guy that's not even running :D :D :D :D
The India Times
Romney is up in ras gallup, and moving ahead despite the fact that brokebackbama has been outspending 3-1. Once the convention is over and Romney can spend his $$$$, its game set match for obama who shot his wad too early.
:D :D
electoral college :D :D :D :D :D
so basicly he got shit for a bump for v.p announcement :D :D :D :D wooooow i'd be happy
That's not really even a bump....WTF is Purple Strategies??? There's nothing to indicate that Romney is pulling ahead...more or less trying to keep up
Gallup +2
Ras +4
Pink Panty Strategies +15
The RCP polling average still says Obama +3.5, and Obama is still ahead in every single swing state (including, most significantly, +3 in Ohio). This may narrow if Romney-Ryan receive a convention bump larger than Obama's, if the August jobs report is abysmal, and/or if Romney-Ryan dominate the debates. But if all of this occurs it will still be an extremely close election, which is what everyone expects anyway.
The RCP polling average still says Obama +3.5, and Obama is still ahead in every single swing state (including, most significantly, +3 in Ohio). This may narrow if Romney-Ryan receive a convention bump larger than Obama's, if the August jobs report is abysmal, and/or if Romney-Ryan dominate the debates. But if all of this occurs it will still be an extremely close election, which is what everyone expects anyway.
In reality Obama should get destroyed, but hey I don't put any stock in polls anyway. Sampling .0000000003% of the population doesn't really give a good picture
Gallup called my parents house the other day and I happened to be there...
All of my responses were "They both suck shit".
RCP includes a lot of outliers.
Indeed. Every time Obama is in the low 40s, some poll come out (usually with a HUGE oversampling of Dems, to which people are actually admitting on TV) that puts him at or near 50%.
Team Obama is legitimately concerned about GOP enthusiasm vs. a lack of such on their side. And, now with reports of 40% of young voters leaning towards Romney, that's really got the Hopey-changey guys in panic mode.
If the youth and black turnout is low, due to this economic mess, it's going to get UGLY.
But, in the end, it boils down to working-class whites. If Romney gets about two-thirds of that, it's a wrap.
your shilling is amazing
Man, that bump didn't last at all....came a crashing down ;D
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/us/general_election_romney_vs_obama-1171.html
General Election: Romney vs. Obama
Gallup Tracking
Obama 45, Romney 47
Romney +2
General Election: Romney vs. Obama
Rasmussen Tracking
Obama 43, Romney 44
Romney +1
Oklahoma: Romney vs. Obama
Sooner Poll
Romney 58, Obama 29
Romney +29
President Obama Job Approval
Gallup
Approve 47, Disapprove 47
Tie
President Obama Job Approval
Rasmussen Reports
Approve 49, Disapprove 49
Tie
Obama and Democrats' Health Care Plan
Rasmussen Reports*
For/Favor 39, Against/Oppose 52
Against/Oppose +13
dddddddduuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu uuuhhhhhhhhhhooooooooooo ooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama's back in the low 40s. Cue some outlier poll, with Dems oversampled out the wazoo, to put Obama back near 50%.
There should be a disclaimer attached to polls that oversample one party or the other.
Romney is not going to win without releasing his tax forms....period. The Democrats have done a great job in ads against him, his business, etc.....I honestly think he can't win unless he does it and very very very soon.
The CNN/ORC poll asked Americans and registered voters whether or not Mitt Romney should release more than two years of tax returns. By a margin of 63%-36%, those polled felt that Romney should release more tax returns. Among registered voters, the result was a similar 61%-37% split.whats the most important issue in the election blacken?
The CNN/ORC poll asked Americans and registered voters whether or not Mitt Romney should release more than two years of tax returns. By a margin of 63%-36%, those polled felt that Romney should release more tax returns. Among registered voters, the result was a similar 61%-37% split.
Who fucking cares about poles, I can take a pole and slant it any way I want by who I ask. And sampling .0000003% of the population is sure way to get a clear picture ::)
yeah ok hahahaha,unless it has romney ahead :D, why don't you show prove of your post ??? oh that's right you can't
Only problem is the left wing ding bats are the only ones that care
whats the most important issue in the election blacken?no answer?
Ill give you a hint, it isnt romneys taxes...
link, show me something or your just talking out your ass :D
Here is a link www.shutyourfuckingpieho le.com
whats the most important issue in the election blacken?
Ill give you a hint, it isnt romneys taxes...
no answer?
the private sector is doing fine, right blacken?
can you read the title of the post,always wanting to change the subjectwhere does the title mention taxes brainchild?
just as i thought :D. this shit goes on all the time on this board
The CNN/ORC poll asked Americans and registered voters whether or not Mitt Romney should release more than two years of tax returns. By a margin of 63%-36%, those polled felt that Romney should release more tax returns. Among registered voters, the result was a similar 61%-37% split.
Only problem is the left wing ding bats are the only ones that care
It seems 2/3 of the nation cares. It's a stupid issue IMO... but romney never should have answered the Q without being willing to back it up.
I paid legal taxes. Next question, econom-destoryer. Thats it. Trying to sell some number without releasing it = poor form.
And you've determined this by a poll that samples .0000003% of the population? Yeah OK
don't most polls survey about 1,010 people? I mean, can we discount every prez poll because they don't ask 110,000,000 people the Q? lol
I don't give a shit about polls. They're only purpose is to try and influence heard mentality. Well everyone else is voting for candidate x because the poll says so.
You're going to make him cry.
Romney is not going to win without releasing his tax forms....period. The Democrats have done a great job in ads against him, his business, etc.....I honestly think he can't win unless he does it and very very very soon.
You're going to make him cry.
Show me a poll of likely independent and other swing voters (e.g., crossover Democrats) that shows a majority, or even a significant number will vote for Obama over Romney because of tax returns.
Show me a poll of likely independent and other swing voters (e.g., crossover Democrats) that shows a majority, or even a significant number will vote for Obama over Romney because of tax returns.
Bill kristol telling him to release them now? yikes
Bill kristol telling him to release them now? yikes
http://www.businessinsider.com/suffolk-poll-romney-obama-virginia-florida-nc-election-2012-10
LANDSLIDE COMING
And then BOOM... We are gonna be rollin in the Dough again. ::)
Get this through your thick head.
Obama = DISASTER 1000000% CHANCE
Romney = 50-75% Chance of Disaster.
PROBABLE DISASTER IS BETTER THAN PROVABLE AND DEMONSTRATED FAILURE.
Hey tell yourself what you have to
I really feel bad for you 94ers. You were so conned and lied to that you still don't have even have a remote grasp on reality of the obama disaster.oh ok cool