Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Religious Debates & Threads => Topic started by: bigmikecox on October 19, 2012, 11:17:22 AM

Title: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: bigmikecox on October 19, 2012, 11:17:22 AM
Why do christians get so mad when you suggest Jesus MAY have been married and why he is still portrayed as a white man with blond hair?
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Roger Bacon on October 19, 2012, 11:18:38 AM
Why do christians get so mad when you suggest Jesus MAY have been married and why he is still portrayed as a white man with blond hair?

Photo of Jesus... Hope this helps...  ::)

Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Kwon_2 on October 19, 2012, 11:19:06 AM
Why do christians get so mad when you suggest Jesus MAY have been married and why he is still portrayed as a white man with blond hair?

Reported!

































Just kiddin' Mike! :D
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: The Wizard of Truth on October 19, 2012, 11:19:14 AM
Well he was from Jerusalem so it's unlikely he was white. Plus he has a Latino name
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Shockwave on October 19, 2012, 11:30:05 AM
Why do christians get so mad when you suggest Jesus MAY have been married and why he is still portrayed as a white man with blond hair?
I've met many Jesus', they're all Mexicans. Therefore, all Mexicans are Jesus.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Wiggs on October 19, 2012, 11:30:54 AM
Jesus was a Jew. KING OF THE JEWS. JEWS of that era as described in the Bible. Bronze skin, hair of wool. Like an arab.

100% truth.  Whites hate it.  I laugh at all these blonde hair blue eye Jesus.  You worship a Jew!
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Shockwave on October 19, 2012, 11:31:58 AM
Jesus was a Jew. KING OF THE JEWS. JEWS of that era as described in the Bible. Bronze skin, hair of wool. Like an arab.

100% truth.  Whites hate it.  I laugh at all these blonde hair blue eye Jesus.  You worship a Jew!
Seriously never figured this out. People I know get so mad when I mention that Jesus wasn't white. Its confusing.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Wiggs on October 19, 2012, 11:34:26 AM
Seriously never figured this out. People I know get so mad when I mention that Jesus wasn't white. Its confusing.

I make it a point to ruin someones day by spreading the truth such as this. People are so fucking hypocritical and stupid.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Hulkotron on October 19, 2012, 11:35:03 AM
Yes Jesus was almost certainly not white.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: HTexan on October 19, 2012, 11:36:31 AM
Why do christians get so mad when you suggest Jesus MAY have been married and why he is still portrayed as a white man with blond hair?
He wasn't white he was Jewish.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Wiggs on October 19, 2012, 11:38:52 AM
Yes Jesus was almost certainly not white.

There is no "almost" about it.  He wasn't white at all.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Archer77 on October 19, 2012, 11:40:40 AM
Jesus was a Jew. KING OF THE JEWS. JEWS of that era as described in the Bible. Bronze skin, hair of wool. Like an arab.

100% truth.  Whites hate it.  I laugh at all these blonde hair blue eye Jesus.  You worship a Jew!

I don't hate it.  Who gives a shit if he was a Jew. It's all nonsense anyway.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Nails on October 19, 2012, 11:40:49 AM
Jesus more then likely lookd just like this




(http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/05/06/osama_bin_laden_AP01010904265_610x458.jpg)
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Tito24 on October 19, 2012, 11:41:04 AM
(http://ep.xhamster.com/000/015/820/221_1000.jpg)
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Shockwave on October 19, 2012, 11:41:34 AM
Jesus more then likely lookd just like this




(http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/05/06/osama_bin_laden_AP01010904265_610x458.jpg)
Good thing the SEALs offed his ass.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: BayGBM on October 19, 2012, 11:52:27 AM
Why do christians get so mad when you suggest Jesus MAY have been married and why he is still portrayed as a white man with blond hair?

Silly Christians.  ::)
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: bigmikecox on October 19, 2012, 11:52:35 AM
(http://ep.xhamster.com/000/015/820/259_1000.jpg)

sweet jesus mike

GOOD LORD!!!!
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Hulkotron on October 19, 2012, 11:52:54 AM
Jesus more then likely lookd just like this




(http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/05/06/osama_bin_laden_AP01010904265_610x458.jpg)

Haha yes, excellent observation Nails.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: hrspwr on October 19, 2012, 11:54:36 AM
jesus left chicago and is headed for new orleans.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: OTHstrong on October 19, 2012, 11:57:44 AM
Why do christians get so mad when you suggest Jesus MAY have been married and why he is still portrayed as a white man with blond hair?
Well because that would mean that the Bible is wrong if he was married. I do not think he had blond hair and he was at the very least as dark as anyone from that region
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: bigmikecox on October 19, 2012, 11:58:53 AM
Well because that would mean that the Bible is wrong if he was married. I do not think he had blond hair and he was at the very least as dark as anyone from that region

Im sure the bible was edited
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: OTHstrong on October 19, 2012, 12:00:34 PM
Im sure the bible was edited
what do you mean by edited?
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Hulkotron on October 19, 2012, 12:03:13 PM
Yes most Christians would have you believe Jesus looked like this:

(http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20100216175319/villains/images/5/5f/Ivandrago.jpg)
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: tommywishbone on October 19, 2012, 12:04:47 PM
I've got some Dead Sea scrolls for sale on Craigslist. Pristine condition. Only read once. $50 OBO.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: OTHstrong on October 19, 2012, 12:05:49 PM
I've got some Dead Sea scrolls for sale on Craigslist. Pristine condition. Only read once. $50 OBO.
they are worth 30 billion dollars but some guy on getbig has the inside scope that they are fake  ;)
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: tommywishbone on October 19, 2012, 12:06:27 PM
they are worth 30 billion dollars but some guy on getbig has the inside scope that they are fake  ;)
;) 
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Agnostic007 on October 19, 2012, 01:01:36 PM
what do you mean by edited?

It's not even about editing. It's about it's compilation from the beginning. When a bunch of men sit around a vote on which manuscripts to include, and leave out at least one that shows up with the Dead Sea Scrolls and is mentioned in the bible...doesn't give me a lot of confidence
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Stark on October 19, 2012, 01:02:28 PM
Photo of Jesus... Hope this helps...  ::)



;D
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Dreadlifter on October 19, 2012, 01:05:27 PM
(http://ep.xhamster.com/000/015/820/259_1000.jpg)

sweet jesus mike

More of this please.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Jadeveon Clowney on October 19, 2012, 01:09:31 PM
I've got some Dead Sea scrolls for sale on Craigslist. Pristine condition. Only read once. $50 OBO.

lair! I can't find them on craigslist.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Parker on October 19, 2012, 01:16:35 PM
Seriously never figured this out. People I know get so mad when I mention that Jesus wasn't white. Its confusing.
Because people want to believe the paintings that they have seen---the paintings from way back. Which depict him as some large eyed, limp-wristed, groveling man.
Then there is the Shroud of Turin, which I believe is a man a lot taller than 5'1-5'2, which was about the average height for men at that time, in that area.

People have been brainwashed or conditioned to think one thing. Oh and that he wore a bunch of colorful (blue, red) clothing, and sat around all day, looking up in the sky with pleading eyes, and praying.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: bigmc on October 19, 2012, 01:20:06 PM
(http://ep.xhamster.com/000/015/820/259_1000.jpg)

sweet jesus mike

god bless you mars for you truly have posted a miracle of nature
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on October 19, 2012, 01:22:03 PM
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Dokey111 on October 19, 2012, 01:57:25 PM


... narrated by Will Brink
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: abijahmaniaco on October 19, 2012, 02:06:30 PM
(http://ep.xhamster.com/000/015/820/260_1000.jpg)

this
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: abijahmaniaco on October 19, 2012, 02:08:40 PM
(http://ep.xhamster.com/000/015/820/221_1000.jpg)

haters gonna' hate
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Hulkotron on October 19, 2012, 02:25:30 PM
Tito has made some great posts in this thread.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: stingray on October 19, 2012, 02:56:18 PM
Why do christians get so mad when you suggest Jesus MAY have been married and why he is still portrayed as a white man with blond hair?

I havent met any christian that says jesus is married.

He will come back one day to earth one day and get married, abolish the eating of the pig and break the cross. He will stop all the wars and bring peace to the earth. He will stay on earth for 40 years.

Jesus mentions he will come back,

 and a little while and you shall not see me; and again a little while, you shall see me because I go to the Father.
(Bible, John 16:16)

This is his physical features, on his return,

"He will be of average height and red and white in colour. His hair spread to the shoulders, straight, neat and shining as after a bath. On bending his head, it will seem as if pearls are falling. He will have an armour on his body. He will be wearing two pieces of cloth light yellow in color"
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Kwon_2 on October 19, 2012, 03:06:19 PM
This is his physical features, on his return,

"He will be of average height and red and white in colour. His hair spread to the shoulders, straight, neat and shining as after a bath. On bending his head, it will seem as if pearls are falling. He will have an armour on his body. He will be wearing two pieces of cloth light yellow in color"


Sounds a bit like this no?

Will he return as Ares? :D
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: littledumbells on October 19, 2012, 05:21:26 PM
Jesus mentions he will come back,

   That he does, and regularly. Jesus comes by every Tuesday to cut my grass
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Viking11 on October 19, 2012, 05:36:00 PM
Ummm guys. By color, Jews are considered white. As are Arabs. Even though they have darker skin in many cases.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: a_ahmed on October 19, 2012, 05:44:21 PM
Ummm guys. By color, Jews are considered white. As are Arabs. Even though they have darker skin in many cases.

Jews are not white. Original Jews like the ones that remained acros Africa and the middle-east were brown skin. "White Jews" or euro khazar Jews are converts. Ashkenazi jews.

The majority of Jews today are not semetic at all. They are europeans. They immigrated in the hundreds of thousands to Palestine way before world war 1. From Europe, east-europe, russia, etc...

If you want to see some original Jews still today, well.. look at Ethiopian and Yemeni Jews. Even Persian Jews in Iran. I had a Morrocon friend who's family was a generation ago Jewish but they became Muslim. He is quite brown skin and does have certain Jewish appearance traits but he is not a 'white' european Jew.

Not to say that they were black, there are light skin brown and darker brown skin people.

It's kind of how Lebanese  Arabs are white and even blonde and blue eyed. The crusaders raped the lands and yes literally the offsprings were mixed with Arabs. Sad reality, but the truth.

As for the topic at hand.

As Muslims we believe Jesus when he returns in this life at the age of 33 will rule, will marry and have children and pass away eventually like we all do.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Viking11 on October 19, 2012, 05:56:29 PM
Jews are not white. Original Jews like the ones that remained acros Africa and the middle-east were brown skin. "White Jews" or euro khazar Jews are converts. Ashkenazi jews.

The majority of Jews today are not semetic at all. They are europeans. They immigrated in the hundreds of thousands to Palestine way before world war 1. From Europe, east-europe, russia, etc...

If you want to see some original Jews still today, well.. look at Ethiopian and Yemeni Jews. Even Persian Jews in Iran. I had a Morrocon friend who's family was a generation ago Jewish but they became Muslim. He is quite brown skin and does have certain Jewish appearance traits but he is not a 'white' european Jew.

Not to say that they were black, there are light skin brown and darker brown skin people.

It's kind of how Lebanese  Arabs are white and even blonde and blue eyed. The crusaders raped the lands and yes literally the offsprings were mixed with Arabs. Sad reality, but the truth.

As for the topic at hand.

As Muslims we believe Jesus when he returns in this life at the age of 33 will rule, will marry and have children and pass away eventually like we all do.
there are only three races on the book ( excluding aboriginals). White (Caucasian), Negroid and Oriental Asian.  If Jews are not white then logically you are saying they are Black or Asian. Nonsense. I dated a Sefardic (Babylonian) Jew.  They are lighter skinned than me. And I'm Swedish descent.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Archer77 on October 19, 2012, 06:00:22 PM
Jews are not white. Original Jews like the ones that remained acros Africa and the middle-east were brown skin. "White Jews" or euro khazar Jews are converts. Ashkenazi jews.

The majority of Jews today are not semetic at all. They are europeans. They immigrated in the hundreds of thousands to Palestine way before world war 1. From Europe, east-europe, russia, etc...

If you want to see some original Jews still today, well.. look at Ethiopian and Yemeni Jews. Even Persian Jews in Iran. I had a Morrocon friend who's family was a generation ago Jewish but they became Muslim. He is quite brown skin and does have certain Jewish appearance traits but he is not a 'white' european Jew.

Not to say that they were black, there are light skin brown and darker brown skin people.

It's kind of how Lebanese  Arabs are white and even blonde and blue eyed. The crusaders raped the lands and yes literally the offsprings were mixed with Arabs. Sad reality, but the truth.

As for the topic at hand.

As Muslims we believe Jesus when he returns in this life at the age of 33 will rule, will marry and have children and pass away eventually like we all do.

They've done genetic testing and discovered there is minimal connection between the Khazar population and European Jewry.  When testing European Jewish males, it was found that the Y-DNA haplogroups J and E, which are typical of the Middle East, are common among European Jews.  This demonstrates a direct migratory line from the Middle East to Europe.

They also found traces of European (including Northern Italian and Western Slavic or Eastern Slavic) in the European Jews. This would be a predictable result of interbreeding with the native European populations.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: sync pulse on October 19, 2012, 07:38:40 PM














Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Parker on October 19, 2012, 08:54:12 PM
I havent met any christian that says jesus is married.

He will come back one day to earth one day and get married, abolish the eating of the pig and break the cross. He will stop all the wars and bring peace to the earth. He will stay on earth for 40 years.

Jesus mentions he will come back,

 and a little while and you shall not see me; and again a little while, you shall see me because I go to the Father.
(Bible, John 16:16)

This is his physical features, on his return,

"He will be of average height and red and white in colour. His hair spread to the shoulders, straight, neat and shining as after a bath. On bending his head, it will seem as if pearls are falling. He will have an armour on his body. He will be wearing two pieces of cloth light yellow in color"

If he came today, what would be the use of ancient armor in today's world? hey-sus needs to get with the times...
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: garebear on October 19, 2012, 09:01:41 PM
Thread reported to God.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: stingray on October 19, 2012, 11:37:45 PM
If he came today, what would be the use of ancient armor in today's world? hey-sus needs to get with the times...

Respect for the question.Because when jesus comes back, there wont be guns, ships, planes, hi tech military equipment. It will go back to the sword and shield. It will be a even playing fields  at all fighting levels.

I honestly dont know how this will happen, but this is the prophecy that is still yet to come.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: garebear on October 20, 2012, 04:21:02 AM
Respect for the question.Because when jesus comes back, there wont be guns, ships, planes, hi tech military equipment. It will go back to the sword and shield. It will be a even playing fields  at all fighting levels.

I honestly dont know how this will happen, but this is the prophecy that is still yet to come.
Oh, ok.

Thanks for clearing that up.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: littledumbells on October 20, 2012, 07:13:08 AM
Thread reported to God.

  Which one?
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: garebear on October 20, 2012, 07:45:38 AM
.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Jadeveon Clowney on October 20, 2012, 06:42:12 PM
please, everybody knows he's an ancestor of bar rafaeli - that's where she got her blonde/blue0eyed good looks from.


phucking communist haters.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: WOOO on October 21, 2012, 05:03:43 AM
Well he was from Jerusalem so it's unlikely he was white. Plus he has a Latino name

 ;D
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Man of Steel on October 21, 2012, 11:55:48 AM
Jesus more then likely lookd just like this




(http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2011/05/06/osama_bin_laden_AP01010904265_610x458.jpg)

This is correct actually.  The blue eyed, light skinned Jesus in paintings is simply inaccurate.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: a_ahmed on October 21, 2012, 01:50:05 PM
To the people who responded to me saying "oh yes they are jews" the euro ashkenazi jews and the 'khazar thing' being disproven.

Tell me then, how is it that they are pale white in contrast to real jews who have been living across africa/middle east?

In fact Israelis (who are majority european white), discriminate against blacks hardcore. Take for instance ethiopian Jews.

(http://www.ethiopianrestaurant.com/images/ethiopian_jews_photos_6.jpg)

(http://ziomania.com/african-jews/ethiopian%20jews60.jpg)

(http://www.biyokulule.com/sawiro/sawirada_waaweyn/Falashas2.jpg)

(http://uploads.static.vosizneias.com/2009/07/ethiopian-jew.jpg)

Or Yemeni Jews:

(http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/P1-AS296_YJewsA_G_20091030173022.jpg)

(http://ziomania.com/yemen/images/yemeni105.jpg)

(http://www.uruknet.info/pic.php?f=yemenis.jpg)

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QfVWU-2pVL4/Si1WMINYVGI/AAAAAAAAGpk/Ilpz2o4aBJU/s1600/Yussuf%2B(C),%2Bthe%2Bfather%2Bof%2BYemeni%2BJew%2BMasha%2BYaeish%2Bal-Nahari%2Bkilled%2Bearlier%2Bthis%2Bmonth,%2Bsits%2Bat%2Bhis%2Bhome%2Bwith%2Bhis%2Bdaughter%2B(L)%2Band%2Bhis%2Bgrandon%2Bin%2BRaydah%2B70%2Bkms%2Bnorth%2Bcapital%2BSanaa.jpg)


They may be white jews, but the original jews were darker skinned.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: 24KT on October 21, 2012, 08:15:14 PM

Or Yemeni Jews:

(http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/P1-AS296_YJewsA_G_20091030173022.jpg)

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QfVWU-2pVL4/Si1WMINYVGI/AAAAAAAAGpk/Ilpz2o4aBJU/s1600/Yussuf%2B(C),%2Bthe%2Bfather%2Bof%2BYemeni%2BJew%2BMasha%2BYaeish%2Bal-Nahari%2Bkilled%2Bearlier%2Bthis%2Bmonth,%2Bsits%2Bat%2Bhis%2Bhome%2Bwith%2Bhis%2Bdaughter%2B(L)%2Band%2Bhis%2Bgrandon%2Bin%2BRaydah%2B70%2Bkms%2Bnorth%2Bcapital%2BSanaa.jpg)

Oh no he didn't?   :o  Tell me you didn't just post a picture of Jewish women wearing burkas?  :P

You wouldn't by any chance be making a definitive statement about there being a big difference between religion & culture would you?  ;D

Quote
They may be white jews, but the original jews were darker skinned.

Much, Much, MUCH, MUCH, DARKER SKINNED!  :P
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: a_ahmed on October 21, 2012, 08:37:48 PM
Well all believing faiths used to cover, male and female. That's a fact. Even zoroastrian men and women cover! It's one of the oldest monotheistic faith, I studied them before embracing Islam as well, unfortunately much of their teachings have been lost and later perverted (they end up worshipping fire). Their women also wear the veil, their men also wear head coverings like what muslim men and jewish men wear.

Mary was veiled too and is always portrayed as such, whenever movies are made regarding Jesus or Abraham or Moses, the women would also be shown covering their faces at times (as per bible descriptions). The difference is we Muslims uphold these values of modesty today.

There is nothing wrong with the burqa or niqab. In fact I have a few friend's who's wives wear it. In fact one of them is a teacher and she wears it. It's a whole fear mongering and misinformation ploy to make people hate Islam and Muslims today. You don't see anyone criticizing christian nuns, african and middle-eastern jews (not israelis).

Christians have totally abandoned anything linked to the abrahamaic faiths, Jesus or Mary, they follow in the footsteps of the Romans. The Romans are the ones who popularized shaving for instance hence roman catholic priests shave. Who told them not to mary women and be 'celibate'?

In the bible there are plenty of verses referring to veils and what you would call burqa/niqab.

Likewise the jews, have abandoned much relating to God, modesty, God's law, and just carry a label, do whatever their desire tells them.

Yes some people wear it out of culture/tradition, but this is religiously a dress code. Not all muslim women for instance wear it, but some chose to do it. It does not mean that women who cover themselves to this extent are uneducated or incapable to talk for themselves, it's quite the opposite if you listen to some of them be they converts or not converts (as far as muslims go). And yes it is indeed interesting that in parts of Africa the older Jewish traditions are retained you will find women not only wearing hijab but niqab as well :)

Just go to youtube and look up 'niqab in bible' and 'burqa in bible'. One example of a verse where a women wore the veil, a strange man approaches and she covers her face. Or another example, an evil man rips off the face covering of the woman and rapes her. Stories of the bible for ya.

The whole principle behind hijab, niqab, burqa, etc... is to protect women's dignity not to 'oppress' women as some westerners think. Especially womenizers like sarkozy that made it punishable with jail time to wear niqab in France.

It's ironic that the west talks about liberation of women through exploitation of women. "Cover girl" makeup, more like 'enhance expose girl', it's an ironic society we live in. Where it's 'liberation' to be exploited for one night stands in clubs and bars. To be a 'model' to be a porn 'star', etc... but then women who cover themselves are 'oppressed' for not showing what some pervs wana see.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: 24KT on October 21, 2012, 09:28:59 PM
The whole principle behind hijab, niqab, burqa, etc... is to protect women's dignity not to 'oppress' women as some westerners think. Especially womenizers like sarkozy that made it punishable with jail time to wear niqab in France.

It's ironic that the west talks about liberation of women through exploitation of women. "Cover girl" makeup, more like 'enhance expose girl', it's an ironic society we live in. Where it's 'liberation' to be exploited for one night stands in clubs and bars. To be a 'model' to be a porn 'star', etc... but then women who cover themselves are 'oppressed' for not showing what some pervs wana see.

I know exactly what you speak of. Many of the women I have spoken to who wear hijabs here in Canada say they do it by choice, and that they find it very liberating. I completely understand this. My skin is extremely sensitive to cold, and sometimes in the winter, I will wear a balaclava to protect my skin from Canadian temperature extremes. Not quite a hijab, but for all intents & purposes accomplishes the same thing.

When you step outside your house, and get hit on 24/7, having to constantly put up with lame lines, and vain attempts to get your attention, constantly forced to smile, and sweetly deflect unwanted attention, ...but then throw a balaclava over your face, ...and nothing, . I found it extremely liberating. And I know how it makes my blood boil when sometimes even my own colleagues urge me to get a webcam because "you're easy on the eyes".  ::)

I know they don't mean offense, and I know they're only trying to be complimentary, but they don't understand how it can make a woman feel like a piece of meat amidst a pack of ravenous dogs.

I can see why hijabis find it so liberating, ...not only in preserving modesty, but also in preserving respect for men. It's really hard to maintain respect for men when you see their brains turn to mush over a pretty face, ...and they turn into stupid adolescents trying to impress you with stupid ego driven efforts at alpha-maleness. It seems so much easier to cover up and let the few brain calls they have function again.  :'(
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: a_ahmed on October 21, 2012, 10:15:21 PM
lol, well us men are physiological and psychologically different. It's so well understood, common knowledge by muslims and non-muslims, yet there seems to be a conflict in 'understanding of this'.

Straight up those guys saying those comments showcases what they 'really want'. Yet once they get what they want, being of such low caliber, afterwards you're nothing. Pretty common... and sad indeed..

The whole premise of a woman covering herself is to be respected and judged on piety, modesty and intellect, rather than physical objectification which western society thrives on.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: garebear on October 22, 2012, 12:59:55 AM
Well all believing faiths used to cover, male and female. That's a fact. Even zoroastrian men and women cover! It's one of the oldest monotheistic faith, I studied them before embracing Islam as well, unfortunately much of their teachings have been lost and later perverted (they end up worshipping fire). Their women also wear the veil, their men also wear head coverings like what muslim men and jewish men wear.

Mary was veiled too and is always portrayed as such, whenever movies are made regarding Jesus or Abraham or Moses, the women would also be shown covering their faces at times (as per bible descriptions). The difference is we Muslims uphold these values of modesty today.

There is nothing wrong with the burqa or niqab. In fact I have a few friend's who's wives wear it. In fact one of them is a teacher and she wears it. It's a whole fear mongering and misinformation ploy to make people hate Islam and Muslims today. You don't see anyone criticizing christian nuns, african and middle-eastern jews (not israelis).

Christians have totally abandoned anything linked to the abrahamaic faiths, Jesus or Mary, they follow in the footsteps of the Romans. The Romans are the ones who popularized shaving for instance hence roman catholic priests shave. Who told them not to mary women and be 'celibate'?

In the bible there are plenty of verses referring to veils and what you would call burqa/niqab.

Likewise the jews, have abandoned much relating to God, modesty, God's law, and just carry a label, do whatever their desire tells them.

Yes some people wear it out of culture/tradition, but this is religiously a dress code. Not all muslim women for instance wear it, but some chose to do it. It does not mean that women who cover themselves to this extent are uneducated or incapable to talk for themselves, it's quite the opposite if you listen to some of them be they converts or not converts (as far as muslims go). And yes it is indeed interesting that in parts of Africa the older Jewish traditions are retained you will find women not only wearing hijab but niqab as well :)

Just go to youtube and look up 'niqab in bible' and 'burqa in bible'. One example of a verse where a women wore the veil, a strange man approaches and she covers her face. Or another example, an evil man rips off the face covering of the woman and rapes her. Stories of the bible for ya.

The whole principle behind hijab, niqab, burqa, etc... is to protect women's dignity not to 'oppress' women as some westerners think. Especially womenizers like sarkozy that made it punishable with jail time to wear niqab in France.

It's ironic that the west talks about liberation of women through exploitation of women. "Cover girl" makeup, more like 'enhance expose girl', it's an ironic society we live in. Where it's 'liberation' to be exploited for one night stands in clubs and bars. To be a 'model' to be a porn 'star', etc... but then women who cover themselves are 'oppressed' for not showing what some pervs wana see.
You're not looking for any truth. You're looking to feel superior to others.

I believe you've found it.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: 24KT on October 22, 2012, 01:34:39 AM
lol, well us men are physiological and psychologically different. It's so well understood, common knowledge by muslims and non-muslims, yet there seems to be a conflict in 'understanding of this'.

Straight up those guys saying those comments showcases what they 'really want'. Yet once they get what they want, being of such low caliber, afterwards you're nothing. Pretty common... and sad indeed..

No, these guys who have been making these comments are both happily married men who would never dream of behaving inappropriately towards me, ...they, just don't get it. One of them cracks jokes about if Judi got a webcam and starting doing some of the webcasts, maybe he could finally get some of his downline to attend. They think it's funny, they think they're being complimentary. I find it demeaning.

There was one time, I was trying to persuade the North American Leadership council to alter the way in which they did a few things. One person in particular who was pretty much in charge, and didn't want to make any changes to the way he was doing it. The subject came up spontaneously on a conference call, and he was laughing saying he wasn't going to change anything. well, one of our colleagues made the statement, "Judi, I'm sure all you have to do is smile at him to get him to change his mind". I was shocked & appalled. I felt demeaned & insulted, ...and I thought he had inadvertently insulted the man whose mind I as trying to change as well. I'm glad his wife wasn't on the conference call. I'm sure she would have really appreciated hearing all about how all I had to do was smile at her husband in order to get my way NOT. And here's the thing, ...he wasn't trying to be sexist, or to insult either one of us, ...he just doesn't get it. In the end, I was able to persuade him as well as the entire leadership council to adopt the changes I had suggested, ...not because I smiled at anyone, but simply because they realized it was so much more effective and far more efficient than what they were doing before.

Quote
The whole premise of a woman covering herself is to be respected and judged on piety, modesty and intellect, rather than physical objectification which western society thrives on.

Respect I do not object to, but I'd personally rather not be judged at all. Not even on piety, modesty or intellect. Judge my ideas based on their own merits, ...but leave the person and the physical appearance out of it. I don't need anyone to tell me I'm good looking. And if I ever feel the need for a reminder, ...I'll just go look in a mirror thank you very much!
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Agnostic007 on October 22, 2012, 06:52:51 AM
I know exactly what you speak of. Many of the women I have spoken to who wear hijabs here in Canada say they do it by choice, and that they find it very liberating. I completely understand this. My skin is extremely sensitive to cold, and sometimes in the winter, I will wear a balaclava to protect my skin from Canadian temperature extremes. Not quite a hijab, but for all intents & purposes accomplishes the same thing.

When you step outside your house, and get hit on 24/7, having to constantly put up with lame lines, and vain attempts to get your attention, constantly forced to smile, and sweetly deflect unwanted attention, ...but then throw a balaclava over your face, ...and nothing, . I found it extremely liberating. And I know how it makes my blood boil when sometimes even my own colleagues urge me to get a webcam because "you're easy on the eyes".  ::)

I know they don't mean offense, and I know they're only trying to be complimentary, but they don't understand how it can make a woman feel like a piece of meat amidst a pack of ravenous dogs.

I can see why hijabis find it so liberating, ...not only in preserving modesty, but also in preserving respect for men. It's really hard to maintain respect for men when you see their brains turn to mush over a pretty face, ...and they turn into stupid adolescents trying to impress you with stupid ego driven efforts at alpha-maleness. It seems so much easier to cover up and let the few brain calls they have function again.  :'(

It's equally hard to have respect for women who think they are all that and a bag of chips....and don't mind telling you that.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Griffith on October 22, 2012, 07:33:04 AM
Jews are not white. Original Jews like the ones that remained acros Africa and the middle-east were brown skin. "White Jews" or euro khazar Jews are converts. Ashkenazi jews.

The majority of Jews today are not semetic at all. They are europeans. They immigrated in the hundreds of thousands to Palestine way before world war 1. From Europe, east-europe, russia, etc...

If you want to see some original Jews still today, well.. look at Ethiopian and Yemeni Jews. Even Persian Jews in Iran. I had a Morrocon friend who's family was a generation ago Jewish but they became Muslim. He is quite brown skin and does have certain Jewish appearance traits but he is not a 'white' european Jew.

Not to say that they were black, there are light skin brown and darker brown skin people.

It's kind of how Lebanese  Arabs are white and even blonde and blue eyed. The crusaders raped the lands and yes literally the offsprings were mixed with Arabs. Sad reality, but the truth.

As for the topic at hand.

As Muslims we believe Jesus when he returns in this life at the age of 33 will rule, will marry and have children and pass away eventually like we all do.

Syria, Lebananon, Egypt, North Africa etc were all part of the Roman Empire, dumbass, so of course a lot of them would have been white!
Then before the Romans, Greeks also had contact with some of these regions and of course after that the entire Empire of Alexander the Great.

Then, during the decline of the Western Roman Empire, the Vandals, a tribe of Germanic barbarians took over Carthage and much of North Africa and ruled over it for hundreds of years!
Then this territory went back to the Eastern Romans for awhile/

The Arabs then invaded from Arabia and mixed with them.

Ancient Egyptians were known to sometimes have blonde or even red hair. Studies have even shown that half of European men share the same DNA as Pharaoh Tutankhamen.

The Copts, the descendants of the original Ancient Egyptians did not really mix with the Arabs and represent a closer picture of what the Ancient Egyptians would have looked like.

The same applies to the Phoenicians.....do I need to tell you where the Phoenicians come from?

Then there's Carthage......have you seen what the busts of these people look like? What Hannibal looked like? They looked that way before the Romans conquered them.

To say that Jews would have looked like Ethiopians or Yemenese is completely idiotic......do you even know where Abraham is supposed to have come from...?

Have you seen what Iranians look like.....? Or Syrians? Or Iraqis?

If you believed in evolution you would understand that their skins are slight darker (just like Mediterranean people) due to the stronger sun and have adapted to the local conditions.
Nordic or Germanic whites are lighter because of the climate, lots of snow and less sun.

Europeans and the original inhabitants of the Middle East as well as the current Iranians, Iraqis are basically the same race.

Arabs are originally from......wait for it, ARABIA.

Try calling an Iranian/Persian an 'Arab' and see his response.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: 24KT on October 22, 2012, 08:52:02 AM
You're not looking for any truth. You're looking to feel superior to others.

I believe you've found it.

Is that what you've gotten from his posts?

I get a different vibe. I see someone, not looking to feel superior to others.
Instead, I get an impression of a man, looking to be superior to his former self.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: 24KT on October 22, 2012, 08:54:30 AM
It's equally hard to have respect for women who think they are all that and a bag of chips....and don't mind telling you that.

That's my point Agnostic 007, I don't think I'm all that, ...with or without the bag of chips.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Skeletor on October 22, 2012, 11:12:18 AM
(http://manwiththemuckrake.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/jesus_bbc.jpg)
(http://new.rejesus.co.uk/images/area_uploads/faces/faces_bbc.jpg)
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Archer77 on October 22, 2012, 06:49:48 PM
To the people who responded to me saying "oh yes they are jews" the euro ashkenazi jews and the 'khazar thing' being disproven.

Tell me then, how is it that they are pale white in contrast to real jews who have been living across africa/middle east?

In fact Israelis (who are majority european white), discriminate against blacks hardcore. Take for instance ethiopian Jews.

(http://www.ethiopianrestaurant.com/images/ethiopian_jews_photos_6.jpg)

(http://ziomania.com/african-jews/ethiopian%20jews60.jpg)

(http://www.biyokulule.com/sawiro/sawirada_waaweyn/Falashas2.jpg)

(http://uploads.static.vosizneias.com/2009/07/ethiopian-jew.jpg)

Or Yemeni Jews:

(http://si.wsj.net/public/resources/images/P1-AS296_YJewsA_G_20091030173022.jpg)

(http://ziomania.com/yemen/images/yemeni105.jpg)

(http://www.uruknet.info/pic.php?f=yemenis.jpg)

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QfVWU-2pVL4/Si1WMINYVGI/AAAAAAAAGpk/Ilpz2o4aBJU/s1600/Yussuf%2B(C),%2Bthe%2Bfather%2Bof%2BYemeni%2BJew%2BMasha%2BYaeish%2Bal-Nahari%2Bkilled%2Bearlier%2Bthis%2Bmonth,%2Bsits%2Bat%2Bhis%2Bhome%2Bwith%2Bhis%2Bdaughter%2B(L)%2Band%2Bhis%2Bgrandon%2Bin%2BRaydah%2B70%2Bkms%2Bnorth%2Bcapital%2BSanaa.jpg)


They may be white jews, but the original jews were darker skinned.


Because they intermarriage with the local population, genius.  They tested the Y chromosome to determine the male line not the X.   By the way, Khazars would have also been swarthy in color seeing as they were of a similar stock as the Turkish.
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: OTHstrong on October 23, 2012, 04:48:59 AM
Syria, Lebananon, Egypt, North Africa etc were all part of the Roman Empire, dumbass, so of course a lot of them would have been white!
Then before the Romans, Greeks also had contact with some of these regions and of course after that the entire Empire of Alexander the Great.

Then, during the decline of the Western Roman Empire, the Vandals, a tribe of Germanic barbarians took over Carthage and much of North Africa and ruled over it for hundreds of years!
Then this territory went back to the Eastern Romans for awhile/

The Arabs then invaded from Arabia and mixed with them.

Ancient Egyptians were known to sometimes have blonde or even red hair. Studies have even shown that half of European men share the same DNA as Pharaoh Tutankhamen.

The Copts, the descendants of the original Ancient Egyptians did not mix with the Arabs and represent what the Ancient Egyptians would have looked like.

The same applies to the Phoenicians.....do I need to tell you where the Phoenicians come from?

Then there's Carthage......have you seen what the busts of these people look like? What Hannibal looked like? They looked that way before the Romans conquered them.

To say that Jews would have looked like Ethiopians or Yemenese is completely idiotic......do you even know where Abraham is supposed to have come from...?

Have you seen what Iranians look like.....? Or Syrians? Or Iraqis?

If you believed in evolution you would understand that their skins are slight darker (just like Mediterranean people) due to the stronger sun and have adapted to the local conditions.
Nordic or Germanic whites are lighter because of the climate, lots of snow and less sun.

Europeans and the original inhabitants of the Middle East as well as the current Iranians, Iraqis are basically the same race.

Arabs are originally from......wait for it, ARABIA.

Try calling an Iranian/Persian an 'Arab' and see his response.
Wow Griffeth, I am impressed (no homo), a fellow historian and very accurate history lesson  8)

Ethiopians are Hamatic tribes not Semetic like the Jews, Jews of today can look like any race cause they scattered all over the earth and mixed their race with others, for the most part they would be white or at most light brown. There may be a few descendant of Solomon in Ethiopia cause he married Queen Sheba from Ethiopia and they had a child but we are talking less then 1% of total Jews here.

The Jewish people went through Babylonian and Persian rule for a while but the Persians and the Babylonians did not live in Israel during their reign. In contrast during Roman and Greek rule, both Romans and Greeks lived in Israel. Then of course Germanic tribes and Saxons also lived with the Jews after the fall of Rome but before the Arab invasion. After the Arab invasions in the 7th century, The Eastern Romans (out of Constantinople), also known as the Byzantium Empire came back to Israel/Palestine, also the French and the British. Then the Syrians came in with an Army from Damascus and claimed the land.  So all these races are Semetic.

Now what made laugh my ass off is Ahmed said; "The majority of Jews today are not semetic at all. They are europeans."

NEWS FLASH; Europeans are Semetic  outed  8)

Also just for your information all Arabs are Hebrews as well, people need to study their history around here.  :D
Title: Re: Jesus--Married??? Not White????
Post by: Stefano on October 23, 2012, 04:10:54 PM


Try calling an Iranian/Persian an 'Arab' and see his response.

Lol
Truth. I actually did this in a form of a question. I then spent another 10-15 minutes getting an earful.