Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Irongrip400 on January 19, 2013, 10:13:09 AM
-
Wow, it started at 9, I was in line at 9:45 and didn't get in until after 11. Fire Marshall closed it due to overcrowding. When I finally got in, all the ammo was gone. Shit was crazy.
-
People are buying it up like crazy. Govt policy in effect.
-
People were about to throw down in the line, trying to get in. It would be sad f there were breadlines, people would kill each other.
-
Feel like a big man now do ya? Gunna go shoot some beer cans are ya? Maybe an innocent animal, hmm hmm?
-
Did most of them look like this?
(http://img.totaloutdoornetwork.com/UserFiles/15/159/15929/redneck%20with%20guns.jpg)
-
Did most of them look like this?
(http://img.totaloutdoornetwork.com/UserFiles/15/159/15929/redneck%20with%20guns.jpg)
Is he following Tbomz shaving routine?
-
Did most of them look like this?
(http://img.totaloutdoornetwork.com/UserFiles/15/159/15929/redneck%20with%20guns.jpg)
Cousins?
(http://www.inquisitr.com/wp-content/2013/01/Michael-Moore-New-Year-Resolution-Stop-Saying-I-Support-The-Troops.jpg)
-
Is he following Tbomz shaving routine?
Yes. That may be tbombz in a few years. :-\ :-\
-
Line? Crowds? Just walk in any Big 5 sporting goods store and buy all the bullets you want. Hell buy $10,000 worth. The manager will love you.
-
Feel like a big man now do ya? Gunna go shoot some beer cans are ya? Maybe an innocent animal, hmm hmm?
Shit no, I was gonna trade that shit like a commodity. I don't hunt anymore, I don't like killing animals unless I'm gonna eat them.
-
Wow, it started at 9, I was in line at 9:45 and didn't get in until after 11. Fire Marshall closed it due to overcrowding. When I finally got in, all the ammo was gone. Shit was crazy.
WoW! That little stunt at Sandyhook has been one of the better promotional campaigns thus far organised by the NRA, they may not have to organise another psycho mass shooter event for a while now.
-
WoW! That little stunt at Sandyhook has been one of the better promotional campaigns thus far organised by the NRA, they may not have to organise another psycho mass shooter event for a while now.
Just Obama trying to stimulate the economy any way he can.
Don't wet your diapers over it.
-
Wow, it started at 9, I was in line at 9:45 and didn't get in until after 11. Fire Marshall closed it due to overcrowding. When I finally got in, all the ammo was gone. Shit was crazy.
Irongrip where are you located? I am in Indiana and the big 1500 gun show started yesterday. They showed the line from yesterday (Friday, a work day) and it was longer than 3 football fields. I was going to go tomorrow but I won't now.
-
Irongrip where are you located? I am in Indiana and the big 1500 gun show started yesterday. They showed the line from yesterday (Friday, a work day) and it was longer than 3 football fields. I was going to go tomorrow but I won't now.
Virginia. Fascist police were out in full effect, keeping people "in line". They said the one last week was no where near as bad as this, just a regular show. But, I guess after Wednesdays announcement all bets are off.
-
Virginia. Fascist police were out in full effect, keeping people "in line". They said the one last week was no where near as bad as this, just a regular show. But, I guess after Wednesdays announcement all bets are off.
Did you buy anything? I bought a Stag Arms AR-15 last Saturday from a friend.
-
Did you buy anything? I bought a Stag Arms AR-15 last Saturday from a friend.
Yeah, an Iron Cross. Got a buddy with a good deal on and AR, just gonna buy his. Not buying anything from a place I can't buy ammo too. Gonna go to the local pawn shop and get a 45 so I can get free range time.
-
Nice. The buddy I bought my AR from also gave me 4 boxes of 223 ammo but I am searching for more. If you see a site that has stock please send me a PM.
-
Just forget gun shows and the big box stores. Walmart, Academy Sports, Cabela's, etc..... are all or soon instituting ammo restrictions on major calibers. The profit margin has gotten so strong and supply so small that even regular gun shops are buying ammo at them.
Let's not even speak of the market on the actual rifles, there are guys buying in the double digits because of hoopla about new laws.
It's the best of times, it's the worst of times :) \ :-\.
-
In a functioning free market the cost of goods goes down over time as competition and technological innovation increase. This benefits the consumer. In a command economy (what the U.S has had since the Roosevelt presidency) central planning dictates the prices of goods. This happens either overtly by the use of tarrifs and quotas or covertly by legislating what goods and services can be sold. In all instances of government interference the cost of goods rise because of limits or because the black market has to fill the void.
Government is force.
-
In a functioning free market the cost of goods goes down over time as competition and technological innovation increase. This benefits the consumer. In a command economy (what the U.S has had since the Roosevelt presidency) central planning dictates the prices of goods. This happens either overtly by the use of tarrifs and quotas or covertly by legislating what goods and services can be sold. In all instances of government interference the cost of goods rise because of limits or because the black market has to fill the void.
Government is force.
A+ post.
-
Why? People trying to get their extended clips? ???
-
Why? People trying to get their extended clips? ???
Just in case the American government tries to become tyrannical and take over the USA. We all know those few extended clips would work very well against:
(http://www.military-today.com/tanks/anders.jpg)
(http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/stealth-bomber-25.jpg)
(http://www.a-gc.com/images/2012/11/army-weapons-missiles-HD-Wallpapers.jpg)
-
Just in case the American government tries to become tyrannical and take over the USA. We all know those few extended clips would work very well against:
(http://www.military-today.com/tanks/anders.jpg)
(http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/stealth-bomber-25.jpg)
(http://www.a-gc.com/images/2012/11/army-weapons-missiles-HD-Wallpapers.jpg)
Pfft, just let those Americans come to my back yard tryin to spread sum democracy!
-
Pfft, just let those Americans come to my back yard tryin to spread sum democracy!
PIP IronGrip.
I am sure your guns would work very well against a tank that is about to demolish your home and life. :-\ :-\
-
Yes SFpleasetakemyrights1900 ....I'm sure the American military is just going to roll out and trample their own families homes. ::)
-
Just in case the American government tries to become tyrannical and take over the USA. We all know those few extended clips would work very well against:
(http://www.military-today.com/tanks/anders.jpg)
(http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/stealth-bomber-25.jpg)
(http://www.a-gc.com/images/2012/11/army-weapons-missiles-HD-Wallpapers.jpg)
Some would argue that the you wouldn't need to worry as much about a Military vs. Civilian battle, and that if it came down to it, it might not be as lop-sided as you think.
The theory goes the the military is made up from a good proportion of regular gun owners, and if there ever was to be a civil war over such things the military would be thrown into shambles from the amount of deserters, mutinies, etc.... that would happen if a tyranny ever tried to take over the US.
I'm not sure if I believe that, but it is an interesting question.
-
I'm waiting for the hysteria to die down, not playing that game. I've seen ammo I bought last year selling for 3 times what I paid.
-
Yes SFpleasetakemyrights1900 ....I'm sure the American military is just going to roll out and trample their own families homes. ::)
Who said anything about their own families home? If the government did try to take over civilian life, more than likely people in the military and their families would be spared.
Thus, if they wanted to take away civilian life, they would just need to roll your house over with a tank and your guns would not do shit.
SFpleasetakemyrights1900 ....I loled!
I agree that they should not take away your rights. I never said they should. I was poking fun at the reason for wanting guns, which is to protect oneself just in case the american government tries to take over civilian life. Its a pretty weak argument, considering the average gun will not do much damage against the weaponry of the american military.
-
Some would argue that the you wouldn't need to worry as much about a Military vs. Civilian battle, and that if it came down to it, it might not be as lop-sided as you think.
The theory goes the the military is made up from a good proportion of regular gun owners, and if there ever was to be a civil war over such things the military would be thrown into shambles from the amount of deserters, mutinies, etc.... that would happen if a tyranny ever tried to take over the US.
I'm not sure if I believe that, but it is an interesting question.
I am more inclined to believe that the armed forces would do as told. Hardly doubt enough of them would turn their backs on the American government and fight for the average civilian.
And like I said, gun owners are using the argument that they need to protect themselves from the tyrannical government. If one wants to own a gun, I am fine with that. But come up with a better argument. Your guns will mean absolutely nothing against the weaponry owned by the American government.
-
SF, I think the armed forces would collapse, or at least divide like in the civil war. And, think about armed civilians fighting on their own soil, and the guerrilla tactics that would be used, not to mention the influx of foreign aid from countries that hate America, much like we do in the Middle East.
-
Who said anything about their own families home? If the government did try to take over civilian life, more than likely people in the military and their families would be spared.
Thus, if they wanted to take away civilian life, they would just need to roll your house over with a tank and your guns would not do shit.
SFpleasetakemyrights1900 ....I loled!
I agree that they should not take away your rights. I never said they should. I was poking fun at the reason for wanting guns, which is to protect oneself just in case the american government tries to take over civilian life. Its a pretty weak argument, considering the average gun will not do much damage against the weaponry of the american military.
Must be nice to live in a delusional world.
-
The military have turned their guns on fellow Americans. It's called the Civil War and has more associated casualties then all other American wars put together.
Look up Shea's Rebellion: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shays'_Rebellion This was led by a hero of the American Revolution!
Look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonus_Army the WW1 veterans who were attacked in D.C for wanting their just payment for service, Japanese Americans rounded up in WW2,
Troops brought in to put down Americans trying to unionize: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_union_busting_in_the_United_States
Infiltration of the anti-war movements by the FBI, troops in Ohio State killing Americans, National Guard at the 68 Democratic convention.
There may be good people currently serving who will do right thing but anyone who thinks the Military will just disband when ordered to contain America's disintegration is fooling themselves.
-
Must be nice to live in a delusional world.
Yes, similar to your delusional world in that you believe the government is going to take over civilian life and you need your gun to protect yourself from a tank. :-\ :-\
-
SF, I think the armed forces would collapse, or at least divide like in the civil war. And, think about armed civilians fighting on their own soil, and the guerrilla tactics that would be used, not to mention the influx of foreign aid from countries that hate America, much like we do in the Middle East.
Yes, this may be the case. Its hard to tell. Either way, civilians would not stand a chance. All it would take is to drop a few bombs to wipe out a whole area.
-
Yes, similar to your delusional world in that you believe the government is going to take over civilian life and you need your gun to protect yourself from a tank. :-\ :-\
They wouldn't need a tank.
They aren't going to waste any time if you even fucking aim a gun at them. The govt is going to fire and ask questions later.
The idea that citizens are going to fight against tyranny is fucking laughable.
What isn't laughable is that if all of the fucking conservatives had gotten off their asses and voted for Romney this shit wouldn't be happening.
-
No, don't vote for Romney. He isn't conservative enough......
Obama ought to take everyone's fucking guns away just for being stupid enough and trusting him to let his ass have a second 4 fucking years.
-
I am more inclined to believe that the armed forces would do as told. Hardly doubt enough of them would turn their backs on the American government and fight for the average civilian.
And like I said, gun owners are using the argument that they need to protect themselves from the tyrannical government. If one wants to own a gun, I am fine with that. But come up with a better argument. Your guns will mean absolutely nothing against the weaponry owned by the American government.
The men and women of the United States armed forces are sworn to defend and protect the Constitution of the USA and not to violate it. I don't know where you are getting your nutcase conspiracy ideas that the military can be turned against the civilian population at the flick of a switch.
Besides...where do you think B2 airbases are located??? You really think they are that well guarded? Do you know what the range of an M1A2 abrams main battle tank is???
Seriously, some of you people know even less about military weapons, capabilities, tactics and strategies then you know about guns, semi-automatic rifles and "assault weapons" , hahaha.
I suggest you do some research about the first chechen war and read about how irregular militia armed with ak's and rpgs humiliated the vastly technologically superior Russian army.
-
And like I said, gun owners are using the argument that they need to protect themselves from the tyrannical government. If one wants to own a gun, I am fine with that. But come up with a better argument.
HA HA We're talking about Gun Nutters here, that's the best argument they can come up with, sadly they don't recognise how comical they sound.
-
In a functioning free market the cost of goods goes down over time as competition and technological innovation increase. This benefits the consumer. In a command economy (what the U.S has had since the Roosevelt presidency) central planning dictates the prices of goods. This happens either overtly by the use of tarrifs and quotas or covertly by legislating what goods and services can be sold. In all instances of government interference the cost of goods rise because of limits or because the black market has to fill the void.
Government is force.
peter schiff?
-
In a functioning free market the cost of goods goes down over time as competition and technological innovation increase. This benefits the consumer. In a command economy (what the U.S has had since the Roosevelt presidency) central planning dictates the prices of goods. This happens either overtly by the use of tarrifs and quotas or covertly by legislating what goods and services can be sold. In all instances of government interference the cost of goods rise because of limits or because the black market has to fill the void.
Government is force.
I guess we'll never know. The same private industries that talk up a blue streak about the splendours of free market capitalism spend plenty of cash buying legislation and legislators to tilt the table, by means of government intervention, in their favor. Energy, insurance/health, banking, pharma/food/FDA, etc.
Money talks.
-
Ever since Obomba got appointed I've been telling my fellow gun owners: Buy ammo now!... it's going to be worth more than gold someday. Guess what?... someday is right around the corner.
I have about 15k rounds of various calibers.
I'm rich ;D
-
I'm waiting for the hysteria to die down, not playing that game. I've seen ammo I bought last year selling for 3 times what I paid.
I agree that the mania will die down somewhat, but not to the level of complacency there was before President Commie got into office.
-
I agree that the mania will die down somewhat, but not to the level of complacency there was before President Commie got into office.
I don't know where you guys get this from. He's the best friend that entrenched business interests ever had.
Granted, if he was telling the truth in his campaign promises or in any of his 'come together as a nation' nonsense. Turns out he's a total bullshitter though. In action he's right of Reagan ffs. Really can't see what you're complaining about.
Those of us who expected him to carry though on at least one promise have something to complain about. You guys should be howling with laughter. President Jive Turkey done fooled us but good.
-
I don't know where you guys get this from. He's the best friend that entrenched business interests ever had.
Granted, if he was telling the truth in his campaign promises or in any of his 'come together as a nation' nonsense. Turns out he's a total bullshitter though. In action he's right of Reagan ffs. Really can't see what you're complaining about.
Those of us who expected him to carry though on at least one promise have something to complain about. You guys should be howling with laughter. President Jive Turkey done fooled us but good.
Obomba lies about the lies he lies about.
It's really hard to believe we would get someone worse than the last buffoon.
Pres Hopey is GWB on roids + GH.
-
Yes, this may be the case. Its hard to tell. Either way, civilians would not stand a chance. All it would take is to drop a few bombs to wipe out a whole area.
LOL so we should just give up and take whatever the govt says up the ass?
sorry big man, some ppl would rather die than become what you already are.
The govt doesnt have our best interest in mind and never will. They are out to protect their best interest and so long as our interest coincide with theirs you can continue to fool yourself into thinking they will take care of you. The fact is the minute their interests diverge from yours they will bend you over faster than they will take your guns away.
You think they will just pick and choose which houses to bomb? LMFAO
and by the way its not just the govt we need to protect ourselves from. Remember the riots in LA, where were those tanks and bombs then?
Plenty of reasons to need guns and its not just hunting and to keep the govt in check
-
HA HA We're talking about Gun Nutters here, that's the best argument they can come up with, sadly they don't recognise how comical they sound.
right right, tell us all again nathan jones how if you were here you would wrestle the "gun toting nutters" to the ground and disarm them.
LMFAO at you calling anyone else comical, run along tiny tit grown folks are talking.
-
LOL so we should just give up and take whatever the govt says up the ass?
sorry big man, some ppl would rather die than become what you already are.
The govt doesnt have our best interest in mind and never will. They are out to protect their best interest and so long as our interest coincide with theirs you can continue to fool yourself into thinking they will take care of you. The fact is the minute their interests diverge from yours they will bend you over faster than they will take your guns away.
You think they will just pick and choose which houses to bomb? LMFAO
and by the way its not just the govt we need to protect ourselves from. Remember the riots in LA, where were those tanks and bombs then?
Plenty of reasons to need guns and its not just hunting and to keep the govt in check
That is my point. I agree that guns are used for other practical reasons. My statement was not to suggest that guns dont serve a purpose, but that the argument that we need guns to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government is laughable.
-
That is my point. I agree that guns are used for other practical reasons. My statement was not to suggest that guns dont serve a purpose, but that the argument that we need guns to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government is laughable.
not at all, this is the same idiotic argument piers whats his face made and it carries no weight.
The idea that we wouldnt be able to compete against a govt with guns is just idiotic. First you assert that they would spare those that comply which would open the door to a guerilla style fight where they dont know who the enemy is from a friendly civilian.
I point to vietnam and the current situations in the middle east. The idiocy that youre spouting has been disproven time and time again and is being disproven NOW!!!
In vietnam the viet cong were out numbered and out gunned. Yet there were able to fight a war of attrition using the primitive weapons they had by using tactics.
Same is going on in the middle east right now...
stop and think about it for a 2 mins, shut up and think about it!!!
Now that youre back, thats assuming the military goes along with destroying their homes and killing fellow citizens, neighbors, FAMILY MEMBERS!!!!
-
not at all, this is the same idiotic argument piers whats his face made and it carries no weight.
The idea that we wouldnt be able to compete against a govt with guns is just idiotic. First you assert that they would spare those that comply which would open the door to a guerilla style fight where they dont know who the enemy is from a friendly civilian.
I point to vietnam and the current situations in the middle east. The idiocy that youre spouting has been disproven time and time again and is being disproven NOW!!!
In vietnam the viet cong were out numbered and out gunned. Yet there were able to fight a war of attrition using the primitive weapons they had by using tactics.
Same is going on in the middle east right now...
stop and think about it for a 2 mins, shut up and think about it!!!
Now that youre back, thats assuming the military goes along with destroying their homes and killing fellow citizens, neighbors, FAMILY MEMBERS!!!!
Calm down. I am not looking to take away your guns. Just breath.
Its just a discussion, and its just GB.
-
Calm down. I am not looking to take away your guns. Just breath.
Its just a discussion, and its just GB.
LOL its not just a discussion its an idiotic argument that has been disproven time and time again and is being disproven NOW!!!
yet idiots still want to stand on it as reasoning for disarming populations. Even if you dont want to disarm the public youre arguing an IGNORANT and IDIOTIC point of those that do.
Hopefully you now understand how stupid youve been and will refrain from parroting this stupidity moving forward.
-
LOL its not just a discussion its an idiotic argument that has been disproven time and time again and is being disproven NOW!!!
yet idiots still want to stand on it as reasoning for disarming populations. Even if you dont want to disarm the public youre arguing an IGNORANT and IDIOTIC point of those that do.
Hopefully you now understand how stupid youve been and will refrain from parroting this stupidity moving forward.
Yes. Thank you for this lesson. I just went out and purchased a gun.
-
Yes. Thank you for this lesson. I just went out and purchased a gun.
haha no need for that just stop parroting idiotic and disproven arguments for those that want to take others away is all I ask.
-
haha no need for that just stop parroting idiotic and disproven arguments for those that want to take others away is all I ask.
Why not? Its fun. That is what gets people going on this board.
As was just proven by you ;) ;)
-
Why not? Its fun. That is what gets people going on this board.
As was just proven by you ;) ;)
haha youve spent much more time on this issue than I have bro, so who got who going again?
-
haha youve spent much more time on this issue than I have bro, so who got who going again?
To elicit such reactions from, one must sacrifice and put out just as much as bullshit ;D ;D
-
To elicit such reactions from, one must sacrifice and put out just as much as bullshit ;D ;D
except opposing posts were not bull shit evidenced by my complete destruction of your bull shit in one post ;)
and it took much much less time, I suggest you work on youre trolling...take notes from the more established trolls on the board of which there are many.
perhaps start with race, we all know thats an easy one.
-
I point to vietnam and the current situations in the middle east.
Completely different scenarios, you have no idea what you are talking about.
-
Completely different scenarios, you have no idea what you are talking about.
hahah please do tell, im sure youre education over there in brazil about the vietnam war in which you likely have never met anyone who fought in the war is insightful and accurate.
Please do tell che
-
except opposing posts were not bull shit evidenced by my complete destruction of your bull shit in one post ;)
and it took much much less time, I suggest you work on youre trolling...take notes from the more established trolls on the board of which there are many.
perhaps start with race, we all know thats an easy one.
Well, I never touch race. Not my thing.
Plus, I still have a hard time believing that the average american, who spends 3/4 of their life watching MTV will have much of a chance against the armed forces.
You did use other examples from people in other countries who are probably much more savvy about tactics and weaponry than most americans.
Most American people look like this and spend half their life trying to emulate this. Thus, most americans would not have a clue how to defend themselves against a tyrannical government.
(http://cdn02.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/headlines/2013/01/justin-bieber-trying-to-be-better-after-pot-photos-surface.jpg)
(http://www.tittsworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/guidos31.jpg)
-
Well, I never touch race. Not my thing.
Plus, I still have a hard time believing that the average american, who spends 3/4 of their life watching MTV will have much of a chance against the armed forces.
You did use other examples from people in other countries who are probably much more savvy about tactics and weaponry than most americans.
Most American people look like this and spend half their life trying to emulate this.
(http://cdn02.cdn.justjared.com/wp-content/uploads/headlines/2013/01/justin-bieber-trying-to-be-better-after-pot-photos-surface.jpg)
(http://www.tittsworth.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/guidos31.jpg)
hahaha Id say that a great number of americans are soft, iono about most but many.
Those would likely be the ones that remain loyal and friendly to the govt. If you think that there arent ppl in this country though that are the opposite of what you just posted though. Take a trip to the center of the country, run along the gulf coast, go deep into the south and tell me you think those ppl would be ok with it.
Tactics are learned, they arent inate in ppl. Just like idiots have learned to like the prepubescent tool they would also learn to fight.
You think those farmers in vietnam knew what they shit they were doing when they first joined the viet cong?
they learned and learned pretty damn well
-
Yes, the deep south is filled with genius military people who would demolish the american government. Take a look at these 2 guys from the south. They would strike fear in the eye of most navy seals.
I actually think farmers in vietnam would be easier to teach than most americans, given knowledge of the land, work ethic, etc. Most americans spend 99% of time indoors or on their iphones.
(http://www.dba-oracle.com/images/redneck_mentor.jpg)
-
Yes, the deep south is filled with genius military people who would demolish the american government. Take a look at these 2 guys from the south. They would strike fear in the eye of most navy seals.
I actually think farmers in vietnam would be easier to teach than most americans, given knowledge of the land, work ethic, etc. Most americans spend 99% of time indoors or on their iphones.
(http://www.dba-oracle.com/images/redneck_mentor.jpg)
hahah another idiotic and ignorant argument.
Now that Ive demolished your idiocy on having guns wouldnt do anything against tanks, bombs etc.
Youre moving on to its really the ppl who would be using the guns, not the guns themselves.
LOL troll on moron, troll on...
-
hahah another idiotic and ignorant argument.
Now that Ive demolished your idiocy on having guns wouldnt do anything against tanks, bombs etc.
Youre moving on to its really the ppl who would be using the guns, not the guns themselves.
LOL troll on moron, troll on...
I think its a combination of both. The fact that our technology would not be as advanced, plus the people themselves would leave America at a loss against the government.
And what is wrong with moving on when debating? Debates hardly ever stay on topic. They usually expand to other areas of debating, which usually opens up the debate for a more indepth discussion. That is how people learn. Maybe you're too stupid to realize that. :-\ :-\
As you see, the more we debated, the more we expanded on our discussion. Now we need to take other factors into consideration, such as how a population would actually learn to defend themselves, even with guns, given their lack of training and their propensity to spend all days indoors on their computers. You can hardly ever only take in ONE variable when debating.
-
Now that Ive demolished your idiocy on having guns wouldnt do anything against tanks, bombs etc.
You are the idiot ,you can not compare Vietnam to a government that turns against their own people .
You should study a little bit about dictatorships .
-
I think its a combination of both. The fact that our technology would not be as advanced, plus the people themselves would leave America at a loss against the government.
And what is wrong with moving on when debating? Debates hardly ever stay on topic. They usually expand to other areas of debating, which usually opens up the debate for a more indepth discussion. That is how people learn. Maybe you're too stupid to realize that. :-\ :-\
As you see, the more we debated, the more we expanded on our discussion. Now we need to take other factors into consideration, such as how a population would actually learn to defend themselves, even with guns, given their lack of training and their propensity to spend all days indoors on their computers. You can hardly ever only take in ONE variable when debating.
I agree as evidenced by your original idiocy in this thread.
you do realize that its these same ppl that make up the military right? The military is pulling stright from the pool of ppl it would be fighting. So to think the military somehow has an upper hand in terms of personnel is ignorant.
You do realize that we have millions of ex military ppl in the public right now? you think they will be spared? you think they will side with the govt?
how do you think the viet cong learned? terrorists?
if you had taken in more than one variable when forming your original thesis you wouldnt have come across as the idiotic moron you have. If you would sit back, look at history and take an objective view of the situation you would realise youre being just as idiotic now.
Either way Im down...Im gonna go drink some booze, eat some good food, watch some good football(hopefully) and be happy knowing that history has already and will again eventually prove youre a bigger idiot than someone who spends their time trying to get others to "melt" on the interweb.
Cheers!!!
-
You are the idiot ,you can not compare Vietnam to a government that turns against their own people .
You should study a little bit about dictatorships .
LOL the argument is that out gunned force stands no chance against one with over whelming fire power.
its doesnt matter who is on either side...but if you want evidence of govts with superior fire power being defeated by civilians with less. History is full of those as well you mental pygmy...
LOL later bitches
-
I agree as evidenced by your original idiocy in this thread.
you do realize that its these same ppl that make up the military right? The military is pulling stright from the pool of ppl it would be fighting. So to think the military somehow has an upper hand in terms of personnel is ignorant.
You do realize that we have millions of ex military ppl in the public right now? you think they will be spared? you think they will side with the govt?
how do you think the viet cong learned? terrorists?
if you had taken in more than one variable when forming your original thesis you wouldnt have come across as the idiotic moron you have. If you would sit back, look at history and take an objective view of the situation you would realise youre being just as idiotic now.
Either way Im down...Im gonna go drink some booze, eat some good food, watch some good football(hopefully) and be happy knowing that history has already and will again eventually prove youre a bigger idiot than someone who spends their time trying to get others to "melt" on the interweb.
Cheers!!!
How many are left after you exclude old age, physical handicaps, mental disabilities that would actually be able to fight against a tyrannical government? :-\ :-\
-
That is my point. I agree that guns are used for other practical reasons. My statement was not to suggest that guns dont serve a purpose, but that the argument that we need guns to protect ourselves from a tyrannical government is laughable.
Somehow I knew you'd pay your respects to the great Mr. Drummond soon. :D
-
Somehow I knew you'd pay your respects to the great Mr. Drummond soon. :D
LMAO! ;D ;DMr. Drummond was badass! He turned the lives around for two inner-city youth!
-
How many are left after you exclude old age, physical handicaps, mental disabilities that would actually be able to fight against a tyrannical government? :-\ :-\
just those from the iraq and afghanistan conflicts from over a year ago, 1,353,627
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-veterans-numbers/story?id=14928136#1
"2,333,972 American military personnel had been deployed to Iraq, Afghanistan or both, as of Aug. 30,2011. Of that total, 1,353, 627 have since left the military and 711,986 have used VA health care"
you act like those who are to old to fight wouldnt be a benefit either, you asked who would teach others. Im sure their experience and education would be a benefit.
you should try actually thinking instead of letting your emotions lead the way.
-
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/us-veterans-numbers/story?id=14928136#3
Less than 1% or just over 2 million of the US population serves in the military, but 7% or 22 million of the US population are Ex military.
The military has a little over 2 million soldiers the US population is 308 million...should we continue with the rapidly increasing idiotic argument youre making?
-
Did most of them look like this?
(http://img.totaloutdoornetwork.com/UserFiles/15/159/15929/redneck%20with%20guns.jpg)
WHO is this guy???? i must have used this pic for a joke a good ten times always wondered who this fine speciman is?
-
WHO is this guy???? i must have used this pic for a joke a good ten times always wondered who this fine speciman is?
I do not know. I suspect it may have come from a dating site lol
-
Do you retards not recognize getbig royalty?
thats our very own 240 off season
-
Do you retards not recognize getbig royalty?
thats our very own 240 off season
seriousely???????????????