Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 03:13:10 PM

Title: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 03:13:10 PM
Body Weights in each picture were 190 lbs First Picture, 155 lbs Second Picture, 176 Third Picture.

Calories were INCREASED each time.  Carbs were high throughout.

Total of 10 months.

This is not me.

(http://i40.tinypic.com/2z74xfd.jpg)

Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Marty Champions on June 09, 2013, 03:13:47 PM
if thats you then great
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: ukjeff on June 09, 2013, 03:15:01 PM
doesnt wash his hands much.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 03:15:34 PM
No Cardio either.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 03:18:07 PM
After the first 8 weeks, there were cheat weekends at times and alcohol consumed frequently.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Marty Champions on June 09, 2013, 03:19:20 PM
my body is acid prone, when i increase calories of good tasty food i just get more hungry and lethargic

today i ate raw potatoes, kale chips and sour cream , strawberry /banana frozen smoothy , swiss cheese off the block
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 09, 2013, 03:19:29 PM
So, what's the secret?

"1"
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Marty Champions on June 09, 2013, 03:20:08 PM
i sweat like crazy mowing lawns after drinking the night before, insane sweating
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 03:21:31 PM
So, what's the secret?

"1"
Eat as many calories as you can without gaining fat, keep carbs high.  The opposite of another popular approach.   :D
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: monstermunch on June 09, 2013, 03:22:20 PM
When you going to post your pics?  ;D
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: King Shizzo on June 09, 2013, 03:23:24 PM
After the first 8 weeks, there were cheat weekends at times and alcohol consumed frequently.
Shizzo81 approved.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: cswol on June 09, 2013, 03:30:27 PM
155 lbs and 176 lbs, come on this shit is getting out of control
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: King Shizzo on June 09, 2013, 03:35:24 PM
155 lbs and 176 lbs, come on this shit is getting out of control
You are either retarded or a genius. A troll or a fat bastard. Enron or Chevron?
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 09, 2013, 03:44:23 PM
Eat as many calories as you can without gaining fat, keep carbs high.  The opposite of another popular approach.   :D

I don't get it.

If he eats as many calories as he wants (way above the 3,500 caloric threshold that is assumed to promote weight gain) and keeps carbs high, where does the weight loss come from?

"1"
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: King Shizzo on June 09, 2013, 03:45:44 PM
I don't get it.

If he eats as many calories as he wants (way above the 3,500 caloric threshold that is assumed to promote weight gain) and keeps carbs high, where does the weight loss come from?

"1"
Halo and Call Of Duty.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: King Shizzo on June 09, 2013, 03:49:04 PM
Dude don't post someone else's pics like that and try and sell people on it being you.  You had some credibility going with me until this.
Ummm........ He said it wasn't him. It was in the original post.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: XFACTOR on June 09, 2013, 03:50:21 PM
Ummm........ He said it wasn't him. It was in the original post.

Deleted
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: arce1988 on June 09, 2013, 03:51:06 PM
 :D ;D
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: XFACTOR on June 09, 2013, 03:52:31 PM
Why not do cardio for health though? Bike riding running , swimming, etc.. all make me feel awesome.  It's something I've missed out on for so long.  If there's one piece of advice I would give it's do cardio.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 03:53:45 PM
I don't get it.

If he eats as many calories as he wants (way above the 3,500 caloric threshold that is assumed to promote weight gain) and keeps carbs high, where does the weight loss come from?

"1"
He didn`t eat as many as he wanted.  Nobody said that.  Started with 2000 to get down to 155, then from 155 lbs to 176 he went to 2500 calories-3300 where there is a small, small deficit and maintenance.

Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: XFACTOR on June 09, 2013, 03:56:49 PM
He didn`t eat as many as he wanted.  Nobody said that.  Started with 2000 to get down to 155, then from 155 lbs to 176 he went to 2500 calories-3300 where there is a small, small deficit and maintenance.



I stopped counting all this crap a while ago.  Only carbs I count.  What does 2,500 cals look like

a few chicken breasts, a bunch of veggies, maybe an omelette, and a burger?
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 03:57:24 PM
I don't get it.

If he eats as many calories as he wants (way above the 3,500 caloric threshold that is assumed to promote weight gain) and keeps carbs high, where does the weight loss come from?

"1"
Don`t fool yourself thinking Carbohydrates are in any way the enemy.  They aren`t.  How many people have I posted in single digits, lifetime natural, who kept calories and carbs high throughout?

I am purposely posting other people than me as I am removing myself from the equation (although I follow the same thing-higher calories, high carbs, eat what you want) in order for people to see that the high calorie, high carb approach does indeed work well.

Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 03:59:50 PM
I stopped counting all this crap a while ago.  Only carbs I count.  What does 2,500 cals look like

a few chicken breasts, a bunch of veggies, maybe an omelette, and a burger?
No reason to count carbs at all.  Just overall calories.  Carbs are not the enemy at all.


2500 can look like whatever you want it to, but chances are, you will overestimate if you don`t count.  If you are in a surplus for any amount of sustained time, you will gain fat.  Best to know what you are eating.

Especially if you cook elaborate meals where fats are incorporated in the dish as binders or what not.

Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: monstermunch on June 09, 2013, 04:00:17 PM
I am purposely posting other people than me as I am removing myself from the equation (although I follow the same thing-higher calories, high carbs, eat what you want) in order for people to see that the high calorie, high carb approach does indeed work well.

Yes, that's why you're posting other people  ;D
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 04:03:18 PM
Yes, that's why you're posting other people  ;D
It is actually.  Then when I do post mine, I can hear all the usual bullshit that will surely come.  Drugs, "you didn`t eat that", pics are 15 years old, photoshop, hired a professional to take pics to make you look better and on and on and on.

You will be the first to know when I post a picture.  How does that work out for you?  Calipers read 8 percent today at a body weight of 173.1 this morning.  My best so far.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 09, 2013, 04:04:09 PM
Don`t fool yourself thinking Carbohydrates are in any way the enemy.  They aren`t.  How many people have I posted in single digits, lifetime natural, who kept calories and carbs high throughout?

I am purposely posting other people than me as I am removing myself from the equation (although I follow the same thing-higher calories, high carbs, eat what you want) in order for people to see that the high calorie, high carb approach does indeed work well.

So they keep calories and carbs high, but do not surpass the 3,500 caloric mark?

"1"
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 04:04:16 PM
Guy is 6 Feet tall by the way.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 04:06:00 PM
So they keep calories and carbs high, but do not surpass the 3,500 caloric mark?

"1"
Why do you keep saying 3500 calories?  Where are you pulling this number from?  ???  Some may be able to go over that number, but this particular individual is consuming 3300 daily at the moment.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: King Shizzo on June 09, 2013, 04:06:27 PM
It is actually.  Then when I do post mine, I can hear all the usual bullshit that will surely come.  Drugs, "you didn`t eat that", pics are 15 years old, photoshop, hired a professional to take pics to make you look better and on and on and on.

You will be the first to know when I post a picture.  How does that work out for you?  Calipers read 8 percent today at a body weight of 173.1 this morning.  My best so far.
Adonis owning minds in this thread.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Disgusted on June 09, 2013, 04:09:08 PM
There is no reason he would gain 20 pounds of muscle just by adding calories anymore than he would lose muscle for being in a "deficit".  
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: BikiniSlut on June 09, 2013, 04:16:37 PM
99% of people that read this thread and decide to try and achieve a lean physique by what TA has said will fail. He is

a) not giving us the whole story or

b)not telling us that that individual has amazing genetics and this is something that most can not achieve
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Nomad on June 09, 2013, 04:18:26 PM
99% of people that read this thread and decide to try and achieve a lean physique by what TA has said will fail. He is

a) not giving us the whole story or

b)not telling us that that individual has amazing genetics and this is something that most can not achieve

6 ft tall, 176 lbs. Oh brother    ::)

Depends on the time frame.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Marty Champions on June 09, 2013, 04:19:59 PM
It is actually.  Then when I do post mine, I can hear all the usual bullshit that will surely come.  Drugs, "you didn`t eat that", pics are 15 years old, photoshop, hired a professional to take pics to make you look better and on and on and on.

You will be the first to know when I post a picture.  How does that work out for you?  Calipers read 8 percent today at a body weight of 173.1 this morning.  My best so far.
just put up the pics now dont be shy
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Disgusted on June 09, 2013, 04:20:34 PM
99% of people that read this thread and decide to try and achieve a lean physique by what TA has said will fail. He is

a) not giving us the whole story or

b)not telling us that that individual has amazing genetics and this is something that most can not achieve

Actually I don't see any difference in the second or third pic other than the angle. All I see is a guy who looks to have lost about 15 pounds of fat. For all we know he may have just done an hour of cardio everyday and not changed his diet at all.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: True on June 09, 2013, 04:38:56 PM
yes dishusted, i see the same thing.

so took the guy 10 months to get so lean.

big deal, if he done that on less calories guess what would have taken less time.

he did it alegedly on 3500 cals of carbs without getting fat, this means, he was very active in those 10 months, i suspect lots of....

swimming activities ;D ;D


He didnt do any cardio..... ::)
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Disgusted on June 09, 2013, 04:39:07 PM
yes dishusted, i see the same thing.

so took the guy 10 months to get so lean.

big deal, if he done that on less calories guess what would have taken less time.

he did it alegedly on 3500 cals of carbs without getting fat, this means, he was very active in those 10 months, i suspect lots of....

swimming activities ;D ;D


Actually the whole scenario of what he says happened makes no sense at all.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 09, 2013, 04:43:04 PM
Why do you keep saying 3500 calories?  Where are you pulling this number from?  ???  Some may be able to go over that number, but this particular individual is consuming 3300 daily at the moment.

Your weight is a balancing act, but the equation is simple: If you eat more calories than you burn, you gain weight.

Because 3,500 calories equals about 1 pound (0.45 kilogram) of fat, you need to burn 3,500 calories more than you take in to lose 1 pound. So if you cut 500 calories from your typical diet each day, you'd lose about 1 pound a week (500 calories x 7 days = 3,500 calories). It isn't quite this simple, however, and you usually lose a combination of fat, lean tissue and water. Also, because of changes that occur in the body as a result of weight loss, you may need to decrease calories further to continue weight loss.

Source: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/calories/WT00011 (http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/calories/WT00011) (Mayo Clinic)

Personally, whenever I've wanted to get shredded (6-pack and bodyfat around 10-12% tops) quick, I typically go on a Keto diet with a max of 2,000 calories consumed daily via healthy fats, proteins and minimal carb intake (<75 grams).

"1"
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: doison on June 09, 2013, 05:10:31 PM
So, what's the secret?

"1"

Eat more calorie and drink more alcohol to get ripped
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Marty Champions on June 09, 2013, 05:37:50 PM
something fishy, the guy grew into shape by increasing the calories.

even on gear,this is not how itd work
but the guy WONT get any bigger, dude just basically maxed out everything, tons of people are lean like that especially Afro-Americanos
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 06:03:59 PM
Google Reverse Dieting.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: BikiniSlut on June 09, 2013, 06:22:51 PM
dont roll your mongoloid eyes on me , retard

how do you know what he did, are you perhaps his mother or boyfrend or something ???



Quit being so emotional you little girl! :D

He's rolling his eyes at TA saying that the guy didn't do any cardio.

Not rolling his eyes at you silly.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Maddy on June 09, 2013, 06:43:30 PM
Body Weights in each picture were 190 lbs First Picture, 155 lbs Second Picture, 176 Third Picture.

Calories were INCREASED each time.  Carbs were high throughout.

Total of 10 months.

This is not me.

(http://i40.tinypic.com/2z74xfd.jpg)



down 35
then up 21
in 10 months
drugfree
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 06:53:40 PM
Your weight is a balancing act, but the equation is simple: If you eat more calories than you burn, you gain weight.

Because 3,500 calories equals about 1 pound (0.45 kilogram) of fat, you need to burn 3,500 calories more than you take in to lose 1 pound. So if you cut 500 calories from your typical diet each day, you'd lose about 1 pound a week (500 calories x 7 days = 3,500 calories). It isn't quite this simple, however, and you usually lose a combination of fat, lean tissue and water. Also, because of changes that occur in the body as a result of weight loss, you may need to decrease calories further to continue weight loss.

Source: http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/calories/WT00011 (http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/calories/WT00011) (Mayo Clinic)

Personally, whenever I've wanted to get shredded (6-pack and bodyfat around 10-12% tops) quick, I typically go on a Keto diet with a max of 2,000 calories consumed daily via healthy fats, proteins and minimal carb intake (<75 grams).

"1"
I still don`t understand using 3500 as an arbitrary number for someones Max intake.  It will always vary depending on a persons metabolism and activity.  Some will be able to lose on 3500 with no cardio, some won`t and so on.  You can increase your metabolic capacity certainly to handle more calories without doing any more activity than you currently do.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: OneMoreRep on June 09, 2013, 07:02:59 PM
I still don`t understand using 3500 as an arbitrary number for someones Max intake.  It will always vary depending on a persons metabolism and activity.  Some will be able to lose on 3500 with no cardio, some won`t and so on.  You can increase your metabolic capacity certainly to handle more calories without doing any more activity than you currently do.

I am not sure how they arrived at that number.

Typically, I see it used as a reference for potential weight gain once caloric intake surpasses it.

I think the young man has a nice build, albeit on the smaller side.

"1"
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Maddy on June 09, 2013, 07:05:09 PM
I still don`t understand using 3500 as an arbitrary number for someones Max intake.  It will always vary depending on a persons metabolism and activity.  Some will be able to lose on 3500 with no cardio, some won`t and so on.  You can increase your metabolic capacity certainly to handle more calories without doing any more activity than you currently do.

Quote
Because 3,500 calories equals about 1 pound (0.45 kilogram) of fat
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 07:10:27 PM

Doesn`t make sense genius, see above.

If some twink can eat 3600 calories a day and not gain any weight and then he eats 3500, how is he going to gain a lb of body weight?


Understand now?
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Disgusted on June 09, 2013, 07:46:45 PM
This whole entire thread is ridiculous. There is not a 35 pound weight different in the two pictures.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Maddy on June 09, 2013, 07:57:18 PM
Doesn`t make sense genius, see above.

If some twink can eat 3600 calories a day and not gain any weight and then he eats 3500, how is he going to gain a lb of body weight?


Understand now?

what does
that have to
do with how
many calories
are in a
pound of fat
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Hulkotron on June 09, 2013, 07:58:58 PM
Adonis sharing secrets and owning fragile minds
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Mr Anabolic on June 09, 2013, 08:06:26 PM
After the first 8 weeks, there were cheat weekends at times and alcohol consumed frequently.

And ate cold pizza for breakfast everyday. ::)

You're such a pathetic gimmick.  Give it up already.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Borracho on June 09, 2013, 08:17:51 PM
Body Weights in each picture were 190 lbs First Picture, 155 lbs Second Picture, 176 Third Picture.

Calories were INCREASED each time.  Carbs were high throughout.

Total of 10 months.

This is not me.

(http://i40.tinypic.com/2z74xfd.jpg)



unbelievable.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 09, 2013, 08:27:11 PM
And ate cold pizza for breakfast everyday. ::)

You're such a pathetic gimmick.  Give it up already.
Believe what you want to moron, I am just stating facts.

Keep doing what you are doing, you will be just fine.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: BikiniSlut on June 09, 2013, 08:34:43 PM
Adonis sharing nothing and owning absolutely nobodys minds

Fixed.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: theredeemer on June 09, 2013, 08:38:56 PM


(http://i40.tinypic.com/2z74xfd.jpg)



Not blessed with the best structure, but you look pretty good.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Mr Anabolic on June 09, 2013, 08:40:52 PM
Believe what you want to moron, I am just stating facts.

Keep doing what you are doing, you will be just fine.

30 years of working out and I am doing more than fine.  That's probably longer than you been alive little boy.

35,000 posts?... get a life.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Shockwave on June 09, 2013, 08:47:02 PM
Don`t fool yourself thinking Carbohydrates are in any way the enemy.  They aren`t.  How many people have I posted in single digits, lifetime natural, who kept calories and carbs high throughout?

I am purposely posting other people than me as I am removing myself from the equation (although I follow the same thing-higher calories, high carbs, eat what you want) in order for people to see that the high calorie, high carb approach does indeed work well.


Ive been dieting totally differently, concerning myself only with total caloric intake, and my daily meals usually look like this -
4 whole eggs w/salsa and 2 pieces of toast w/butter
3 scoops whey protein with fat free milk
8-10 oz baked chicken thighs marinaded or seasoned with various things and white rice w/butter
8-10 oz ribeye of new york for dinner, white rice w/butter

Basically been eating semi-clean but with all the trimmings that people usually go without, and I've lost 40 lbs so far. And it's way easier to eat meals that actually have flavor than dry ass chicken breast and brown rice.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Psychopath on June 09, 2013, 08:52:13 PM
So he lost some weight. Good for him.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: dj181 on June 09, 2013, 10:04:47 PM
Why not do cardio for health though? Bike riding running , swimming, etc.. all make me feel awesome.  It's something I've missed out on for so long.  If there's one piece of advice I would give it's do cardio.

because it cuts into recovery, and you can get plenty of heart training through effective weight training
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: dj181 on June 09, 2013, 10:09:26 PM
what you mean not best structure?

this is amazing structure, sdoesnt get any beter for non-mulattos

agreed

he's gotta be trolling
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Seven Copper Coins on June 09, 2013, 10:24:01 PM
because it cuts into recovery, and you can get plenty of heart training through effective weight training

I used to think the same thing until i started cycling 15 miles at a clip running at a hard pace....no comparison.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: theredeemer on June 09, 2013, 10:28:49 PM
agreed

he's gotta be trolling

Not trolling.  Too small ribcage, poor shaped legs.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: dj181 on June 09, 2013, 10:39:36 PM
Not trolling.  Too small ribcage, poor shaped legs.

so post up a pic of what you consider to be an ideal structure

here's my opinion of an ideal structure

(http://anthonymychal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/frank-zane1.jpg)
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Seven Copper Coins on June 09, 2013, 10:43:24 PM
so post up a pic of what you consider to be an ideal structure

here's my opinion of an ideal structure

(http://anthonymychal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/frank-zane1.jpg)

Post a straight on pic of Zane. His shoulders werent that wide and his hips werent that narrow.

Same thing with Nubret, there are these signature pics of them that are not true representations
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: dj181 on June 09, 2013, 10:53:10 PM
Post a straight on pic of Zane. His shoulders werent that wide and his hips werent that narrow.

Same thing with Nubret, there are these signature pics of them that are not true representations

yeah, i guess you're right

paris has great structure, but is legs were too damn big for his upper body, at least that's my opinion

(http://hdwpapers.com/thumbs/frank_zane_photo_2-t2.jpg)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CDiGPXm1YGY/UFeuLfPDQVI/AAAAAAAAAGQ/JV7ocOiVVB8/s1600/BobParis2.jpg)
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Seven Copper Coins on June 09, 2013, 11:11:31 PM
yeah, i guess you're right

paris has great structure, but is legs were too damn big for his upper body, at least that's my opinion

(http://hdwpapers.com/thumbs/frank_zane_photo_2-t2.jpg)

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-CDiGPXm1YGY/UFeuLfPDQVI/AAAAAAAAAGQ/JV7ocOiVVB8/s1600/BobParis2.jpg)

Paris had long abs, and slightly short legs. just like every one of these guys, you can find iconic pics of them...you can also find pics where they look ordinary.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: no one on June 10, 2013, 02:39:42 AM
because it cuts into recovery, and you can get plenty of heart training through effective weight training

wtf is it with this place and the broscience here lately.

going for a bike ride outside or just doing any kind of cardiovascular activity that taxes your system in the least will now cause a inability to grow or maintain muscle. gotcha. ever see what a cyclists legs look like, stupid? even recreational cyclists legs? they are not spindles like yours. but yeah someone should tell them all that cardio they are doing is going to impair their ability to 'recover'  ::)

shut the fuck up with this parroting broscience stupidity please and think before you talk next time. thanks in advance.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Lord Chronos on June 10, 2013, 02:43:41 AM
Body Weights in each picture were 190 lbs First Picture, 155 lbs Second Picture, 176 Third Picture.

Calories were INCREASED each time.  Carbs were high throughout.

Total of 10 months.

This is not me.

(http://i40.tinypic.com/2z74xfd.jpg)



yes Im sure supplements and other products were increased during this time as well
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Rami on June 10, 2013, 02:57:05 AM
you don't know that, this isn't you
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: dj181 on June 10, 2013, 03:36:46 AM
wtf is it with this place and the broscience here lately.

going for a bike ride outside or just doing any kind of cardiovascular activity that taxes your system in the least will now cause a inability to grow or maintain muscle. gotcha. ever see what a cyclists legs look like, stupid? even recreational cyclists legs? they are not spindles like yours. but yeah someone should tell them all that cardio they are doing is going to impair their ability to 'recover'  ::)

shut the fuck up with this parroting broscience stupidity please and think before you talk next time. thanks in advance.

 ???

(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-shAtZzVTg8U/UCMlwWyYTJI/AAAAAAAACXA/HiATNsdSERw/s1600/howard-schatz-and-beverly-ornstein-olympic-athlete-body-types-mens-long-distance-running-marathon-decathlon.jpg)
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: bigmc on June 10, 2013, 04:21:34 AM
lmao at ta posting pics of random strangers to prove his point

are we to take this strangers word because he said it on the internet

at this point the only way ta can prove his point is to post a new pic looking ripped plus some evidence of his diet
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Seven Copper Coins on June 10, 2013, 04:26:59 AM
lmao at ta posting pics of random strangers to prove his point

are we to take this strangers word because he said it on the internet

at this point the only way ta can prove his point is to post a new pic looking ripped plus some evidence of his diet

I find it amazing, that people still take his bait on the diet bullshit. I can honestly say i haven't read through a whole TA post on diet in 5 years, i skip over them.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: King Shizzo on June 10, 2013, 06:05:17 AM
I find it amazing, that people still take his bait on the diet bullshit. I can honestly say i haven't read through a whole TA post on diet in 5 years, i skip over them.
Yeah, but he is right though. His is only one diet out of thousands that work. You can literally eat anything as long as you stay within a certain caloric level.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Thin Lizzy on June 10, 2013, 06:35:06 AM
Google Reverse Dieting.

This seems to refer to bodybuilding contestants increasing their calories after a show. They're not losing weight during this time period.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 10, 2013, 11:07:24 AM
I find it amazing, that people still take his bait on the diet bullshit. I can honestly say i haven't read through a whole TA post on diet in 5 years, i skip over them.
You probably shouldn`t skip them.  There is no bait and if you think there is bait and that I am baiting someone than you are the dupe.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on June 10, 2013, 11:08:08 AM
This seems to refer to bodybuilding contestants increasing their calories after a show. They're not losing weight during this time period.
Look more into it.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: MAXX on June 14, 2013, 10:33:51 AM
No reason to count carbs at all.  Just overall calories.  Carbs are not the enemy at all.


2500 can look like whatever you want it to, but chances are, you will overestimate if you don`t count.  If you are in a surplus for any amount of sustained time, you will gain fat.  Best to know what you are eating.

Especially if you cook elaborate meals where fats are incorporated in the dish as binders or what not.


carbs are useless. it's not an essential nutrient. just the bodys fast available fuel source.
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: BikiniSlut on June 18, 2013, 08:32:49 AM
Yeah, but he is right though. His is only one diet out of thousands that work. You can literally eat anything as long as you stay within a certain caloric level.

This.

Although this doesn't apply to this thread because he's not giving up the secret to this guys "amazing" success.  ::)
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: Rammstein on June 19, 2013, 07:29:12 AM
TA,

you will probably approve of this guy's diet:

http://circastrength.blogspot.com/2013/04/the-biorhythm-diet_18.html
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: ukjeff on June 19, 2013, 08:06:22 AM
carbs are useless. it's not an essential nutrient. just the bodys fast available fuel source.
Carbs are useless?
Have you heard of Protein Starvation?
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: pedro01 on June 19, 2013, 08:11:36 AM
Body Weights in each picture were 190 lbs First Picture, 155 lbs Second Picture, 176 Third Picture.

Calories were INCREASED each time.  Carbs were high throughout.

Total of 10 months.

This is not me.

(http://i40.tinypic.com/2z74xfd.jpg)



What's his blood pressure in the third pic?
Title: Re: 2000 cal First to second Picture 2500 Second pic to Third and now 3300 calories.
Post by: The True Adonis on March 06, 2014, 04:55:51 PM
 8)