Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Pet shop boys on November 02, 2013, 11:34:27 AM

Title: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 02, 2013, 11:34:27 AM
I know Beatles are Gods among mortals.  With 27 number one hits.

But pick their 5 best songs compared them with Oasis 5 best.  

I'm going with Oasis. Easily.

1-live forever
2-don't look back in anger
3-sad song
4-wonder wall
5- champaign supernova.




Wooosssshhhhhhhh



Wooossshhhhhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Knooger on November 02, 2013, 11:36:49 AM
(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-2sFYNz1GhaI/Tsp2Sz7E9SI/AAAAAAAAAAA/ieUZ_QBWURw/s400/SMALL___Blasphemy___Shelly.jpg)
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 02, 2013, 11:37:08 AM
Honestly, it's like comparing Justin Bieber to Michael Jackson.....different eras, different sounds but similar genres.

Not the same genre but similar.

I can't compare.....apples to oranges.

However when deciding which one I like better I am having difficulty. Neither strikes my fancy really.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Knooger on November 02, 2013, 11:43:39 AM
Honestly, it's like comparing Justin Bieber to Michael Jackson.....different eras, different sounds but similar genres.

Not the same genre but similar.

I can't compare.....apples to oranges.

(http://i1.cpcache.com/product/583404962/i_am_the_voice_of_reason_tee.jpg?color=CharcoalHeather&height=225&width=225)



However when deciding which one I like better I am having difficulty. Neither strikes my fancy really.


(http://cinemarant.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/now-you-burn-in-hell.gif?w=774)
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Darren Avey on November 02, 2013, 11:55:07 AM
Oasis are shit, the Beatles rule over them supreme. Id like to give Oasis what i gave a local guy called Brian Castle, a damn good stabbing with my blade  >:(
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 02, 2013, 12:03:32 PM
Oasis are shit, the Beatles rule over them supreme. Id like to give Oasis what i gave a local guy called Brian Castle, a damn good stabbing with my blade  >:(

Is "blade" a UK nickname for penis?
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 02, 2013, 12:06:19 PM
oasis

18 years together

8 number 1's


beatles

7 years

17 number 1's


oasis were a half decent beatles tribute act who had a degree of musical influence on a british stage for a few years

the beatles influenced world music and culture and still do for 50 years


its an easy Beatles win
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Ronnie Rep on November 02, 2013, 12:10:12 PM
I know Beatles are Gods among mortals.  With 27 number one hits.

But pick their 5 best songs compared them with Oasis 5 best.  

I'm going with Oasis. Easily.

1-live forever
2-don't look back in anger
3-sad song
4-wonder wall
5- champaign supernova.




Wooosssshhhhhhhh



Wooossshhhhhhh
Give me a break! Without the Beatles Oasis would not even exist! Like comparing Jason Genova to Arnold Schwarzenegger!
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 02, 2013, 12:14:50 PM
Give me a break! Without the Beatles Oasis would not even exist! Like comparing Jason Genova to Arnold Schwarzenegger!

LOLZ......the fun with Genova never ends. :D
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: tommywishbone on November 02, 2013, 12:18:17 PM
The Beatles popularity still confuses me.  They had 3-4 good bubble gum pop songs IMO.  To each his own, I guess. 
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 02, 2013, 12:19:06 PM
The Beatles popularity still confuses me.  They had 3-4 good bubble gum pop songs IMO.  To each his own, I guess. 

Oh brother. 
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 02, 2013, 12:22:23 PM
The Beatles popularity still confuses me.  They had 3-4 good bubble gum pop songs IMO.  To each his own, I guess. 

You have to take yourself back to that time and compare their songs with the other music at that time. It was revolutionary and there was nothing like it. They took music to a whole new level.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: tommywishbone on November 02, 2013, 12:25:47 PM
Oh brother.  

Oh Brother Where Art Tho.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 02, 2013, 12:26:11 PM
oasis

18 years together

8 number 1's


beatles

7 years

17 number 1's


oasis were a half decent beatles tribute act who had a degree of musical influence on a british stage for a few years

the beatles influenced world music and culture and still do for 50 years


its an easy Beatles win


Comparing songs here.  no legacy or influence when Beatles were around they had it EASY.  you only had Elvis Anka skiiliners and that was s it.  Oasis had TONS of bands on radio in the 90's. So SIMPLY pick 5 songs in your humble opinion that are superior in quality,arrangement, lyrics etc.  and make comparison more reasonable.



Wooossshhhhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: HockeyFightFan on November 02, 2013, 12:26:21 PM
Oasis are shit, the Beatles rule over them supreme. Id like to give Oasis what i gave a local guy called Brian Castle, a damn good stabbing with my blade  >:(

I heart this gimmick...
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Ronnie Rep on November 02, 2013, 12:28:08 PM
Oh Brother Where Art Tho.
Good movie! Tommy you gotta be kidding!
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: The Showstoppa on November 02, 2013, 12:29:11 PM
Oh Brother Where Art Tho.

Great soundtrack.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 02, 2013, 12:30:05 PM
Give me a break! Without the Beatles Oasis would not even exist! Like comparing Jason Genova to Arnold Schwarzenegger!


So predictable response   Beatles are Gods pioneers



But no one can put 5 Beatles songs  (musically speaking ) better than oasis. Lol



Wooossshhhhhhhhhhhh  
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Branchs Ears on November 02, 2013, 12:30:28 PM
Oasis is basically a Beetles cover band.
And they both suck.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 02, 2013, 12:30:55 PM
ok five beatles tunes that kill oasis dead


- yesterday

- paperback writer

- a day in the life

- across the universe

- nowhere man
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Ronnie Rep on November 02, 2013, 12:31:38 PM

So predictable response   Beatles are Gods pioneers



But no one can put 5 Beatles songs  (musically speaking ) better than oasis. Lol



Wooossshhhhhhhhhhhh  
It's predictable because it's so!
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 02, 2013, 12:33:26 PM
ok five beatles tunes that kill oasis dead


- yesterday

- paperback writer

- a day in the life

- across the universe

- nowhere man

Please say you're kidding paperback writer ?...


I think you're making this playlist based on nostalgia.



Wooossssshhhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 02, 2013, 12:34:20 PM
another 5

back in the USSR

come together

I am the walrus

while my guitar gently weeps

norwegian wood
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 02, 2013, 12:34:50 PM
It's predictable because it's so!


Hard to make a comparison withouth society's brainwash

But thanks.  



Wooossshhhhhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 02, 2013, 12:35:30 PM
Please say you're kidding paperback writer ?...


I think you're making this playlist based on nostalgia.



Wooossssshhhhhhhhh

It wouldn't matter what songs were posted....you would still think Oasis songs were better.

It's all opinion.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 02, 2013, 12:38:55 PM
It wouldn't matter what songs were posted....you would still think Oasis songs were better.

It's all opinion.


You got a point. I'm a Beatles fan.


But do you honestly  like 5 Beatles songs over the Oasis ones I mentioned ..


If so I respect your opinion. 





Wooossshhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 02, 2013, 12:39:08 PM
paperback writer changed the way bands played and boosted bass


noel gallagher rated the beatles as the best of all time too
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 02, 2013, 12:40:30 PM
paperback writer changed the way bands played and boosted bass


noel gallagher rated the beatles as the best of all time too


Every one has the Beatles as the number one band of all time Oasis doesn't make the top 20.




Wooossshhhhhhhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 02, 2013, 12:40:54 PM
don't look back in anger

opening piano nicked from john lennon's imagine

admitted by noel

Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Whiskey on November 02, 2013, 12:57:52 PM
Hey Jude

Let it be

Happiness is a warm gun

Something

The long and winding road

The Beatles broke up nearly 45 years ago and they're as popular today as they were then, in 45 years nobody will remember Oasis. Nobody comes close to record sales, it's estimated that the Beatles sold over 1 billion records in the last 50 years.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: ProudVirgin69 on November 02, 2013, 01:01:34 PM
You have to take yourself back to that time and compare their songs with the other music at that time. It was revolutionary and there was nothing like it. They took music to a whole new level.

He kind of has a point.... they sound dated.  Whereas other artists from around that same time still sound fresh and unique today.

Just my opinion, I'm sure some music historian can tear my post apart
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: tom joad on November 02, 2013, 01:02:57 PM
i'm not even a big Beatles fan but randomly pick 5 of their tunes out of a hat and they'd probably all be better songs than Oasis' top 5.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: disco_stu on November 02, 2013, 01:10:33 PM
oasis

18 years together

8 number 1's


beatles

7 years

17 number 1's


oasis were a half decent beatles tribute act who had a degree of musical influence on a british stage for a few years

the beatles influenced world music and culture and still do for 50 years


its an easy Beatles win


^^^this.

how many beatles songs made top 10 also?...
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Whiskey on November 02, 2013, 01:21:32 PM

^^^this.

how many beatles songs made top 10 also?...

In April 1964 the Top 5 singles on the Billboard Hot 100 were all Beatles records, I believe they had 20 No.1 singles in the US.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Ronnie Rep on November 02, 2013, 01:26:13 PM
This thread is ridiculous, It was started by someone who goes by the name of Pet Shop Boys! I'm done!
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 03, 2013, 06:12:49 AM
This thread is ridiculous, It was started by someone who goes by the name of Pet Shop Boys! I'm done!

Today is going to be the day that they're  gonna throw it back to you.



Woooooshhhhhhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Army of One on November 03, 2013, 07:47:17 AM
I don't mind the Beatles but much prefer The Beach Boys over them.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: GraniteCityDon on November 03, 2013, 07:52:06 AM
Beatles music is pretty much universal, yeah they were exceptional for their time but Oasis were the same up to Standing on the Shoulders of Giants. Everything they recorded to that point was gold and 30 years from now people will still be saying the same.

My top 5 (at the moment):

Morning Glory, Gas Panic (the live version from Familiar to Millions is exceptional), D'ya Know What i Mean, Slide Away, My Big Mouth
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: mik1111 on November 03, 2013, 07:56:17 AM
all tunes by the beatles are superior. and I'm not a fan of either.
oasis is for homosexuals.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 03, 2013, 12:59:03 PM
This thread is ridiculous, It was started by someone who goes by the name of Pet Shop Boys! I'm done!

There is an absolute hilarious irony with that.

I'll just say kudos to those that actually know who the pet shop boys are.  8) Ahhh.....the good ol days........
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: bradistani on November 03, 2013, 01:04:33 PM
There is an absolute hilarious irony with that.

I'll just say kudos to those that actually know who the pet shop boys are.  8) Ahhh.....the good ol days........

even they are better than oasis
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: drmarkp on November 03, 2013, 01:07:44 PM
The Beatles popularity still confuses me.  They had 3-4 good bubble gum pop songs IMO.  To each his own, I guess. 

You'd had to have been there to appreciate them; as far as this Oasis- I swear to God I have never even heard of them...
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Ronnie Rep on November 03, 2013, 01:50:37 PM
There is an absolute hilarious irony with that.

I'll just say kudos to those that actually know who the pet shop boys are.  8) Ahhh.....the good ol days........
You do know that their name is a reference to all things gay! Not that there's anything wrong with that, just saying!
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: MikMaq on November 03, 2013, 01:51:28 PM
Oasis the near perfect description of a one hit wonder. The only reason there not is because the british had to have something in the age of grunge.


The beatles atleast on paper were one of the most perfect bands in history. The biggest flaw is drowning cat allowing paul maccarthy to take over.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: GraniteCityDon on November 03, 2013, 01:57:47 PM
Oasis the near perfect description of a one hit wonder. The only reason there not is because the british had to have something in the age of grunge.

70 million records sold, numerous #1 songs and albums and sold out tours for a decade. Ridiculous way to describe them. If you listen to their discography there are dozens of very good - excellent songs they have recorded. No band is everyone's taste but they can not be simply written off by anyone due to their success.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 02:00:25 PM
70 million records sold, numerous #1 songs and albums and sold out tours for a decade. Ridiculous way to describe them. If you listen to their discography there are dozens of very good - excellent songs they have recorded. No band is everyone's taste but they can not be simply written off by anyone due to their success.

Granted but to compare them to the Beatles is fkng comical.  They owe their career to the Beatles
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: MikMaq on November 03, 2013, 02:02:13 PM
. If you listen to their discography there are dozens of very good - excellent songs they have recorded. No band is everyone's taste but they can not be simply written off by anyone due to their success.
Tonnes of bands have catchy songs, they're simply not an interesting band. They're a one hit wonder that got picked up because of what was going on across the pond. The 90's was an era when the package (cd quality, music video, style etc) were just as important as the music.


A comparable band to oasis.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 03, 2013, 02:27:06 PM
Oasis is big because the Gallagher brothers are marketing geniuses. Not because they are uber talented.

Without the Gallagher brothers blowing themselves up, Oasis would be nothing.

They are like Kanye West, but not nearly at his level.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: GraniteCityDon on November 03, 2013, 02:46:09 PM
The Gallaghers are the first to admit their career is due to the Beatles. Granted they werent the absolute best at what they did, but what they brought to the table made for a great time in British music. The only man above them from that era was Richard Ashcroft.

Their press was almost always negative due to fights etc, but their music from 95 - 02ish was phenomenal. Thats why they sold out 80,000 seat stadiums night after night.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 03, 2013, 02:48:29 PM
granite

microdot

do you know them mate?

verve

oasis

when i got out of the big house i worked in dat dere london for a bloke from wigan who did both bands album sleeves.

hope all is sound mate
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 02:49:38 PM
The Gallaghers are the first to admit their career is due to the Beatles. Granted they werent the absolute best at what they did, but what they brought to the table made for a great time in British music. The only man above them from that era was Richard Ashcroft.

Their press was almost always negative due to fights etc, but their music from 95 - 02ish was phenomenal. Thats why they sold out 80,000 seat stadiums night after night.

Radiohead is about ten levels above them...they weren't clse to the best British band from the 90s
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: GraniteCityDon on November 03, 2013, 02:53:49 PM
u mean Brian Cannon? that is a man that knows / works with everybody in the biz!

Groink, i might be the only man alive that will say i hate Radiohead. Ive never found their music, well actually anything about them appealing. I'd rather listen to Muse and i can barely stand them.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 03, 2013, 02:57:26 PM
yes mate

he's a girl by the way

now lives in wigan with his ma

shithouse of a bloke!

he had it all and lost it all through thinking he was liam- he wasn't!
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: GraniteCityDon on November 03, 2013, 03:00:29 PM
i didnt know that, see his stuff on twitter etc and looks a sound lad. PMSL at thinking he's Liam, copying that nut theres only 1 way youre going.......
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 03, 2013, 03:05:07 PM
so many stories about brian mate so many stories!!

bravest man alive after 6 vodka's - biggest coward going without them!

did some great artwork but he's a pisspot now mate
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 03, 2013, 03:21:03 PM
richard gere's fave group apparently
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 03, 2013, 05:07:17 PM
this beatles tune kills it

Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: The Ugly on November 03, 2013, 07:00:50 PM
Fuck I hate the Beatles. I know I'm outta the loop here, but they do absolutely nothing for me.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Army of One on November 03, 2013, 07:27:26 PM
Radiohead is about ten levels above them...they weren't clse to the best British band from the 90s

Smoking the crackpipe here, its unanimous here that Oasis were the best Brit band of the nineties
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 07:32:45 PM
Smoking the crackpipe here, its unanimous here that Oasis were the best Brit band of the nineties

Says a lot about your taste in music.  Oasis were all hype.  Radiohead puts out critically acclaimed albums and packs stadiums to this day.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: chaos on November 03, 2013, 07:39:11 PM
Some shitty bands being discussed in this thread.
I'll see my way out...... ;D
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 07:42:03 PM
Some shitty bands being discussed in this thread.
I'll see my way out...... ;D

What floats your boat ?
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 03, 2013, 07:42:41 PM
Says a lot about your taste in music.  Oasis were all hype.  Radiohead puts out critically acclaimed albums and packs stadiums to this day.

Oasis packs stadiums to this day as well. Quite honestly I don't know why either band does......but to be fair I just don't prefer their music.

Radiohead is much more critically claimed than Oasis however. They also have a much more distinct sound in my opinion. I would almost describe their music as "dreary". However some describe it as "uplifting."

Regardless it's pretty bold of Petshopboys to even consider a comparison between the apples and oranges that are The Beatles and Oasis.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: The Ugly on November 03, 2013, 07:43:28 PM
I don't get Radiohead. Critics seem to, but they're a mystery to me. Pink Floyd, too, I don't get it.  






Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: chaos on November 03, 2013, 07:46:02 PM
What floats your boat ?
I don't have a list of "great" bands as my musical tastes span a huge gap.
Oasis, radiohead, verve, etc. always sounded like a bunch of whining to me. No memorable songs or sounds to keep my interest.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 07:46:25 PM
Oasis packs stadiums to this day as well. Quite honestly I don't know why either band does......but to be fair I just don't prefer their music.

Radiohead is much more critically claimed than Oasis however. They also have a much more distinct sound in my opinion. I would almost describe their music as "dreary". However some describe it as "uplifting."

Regardless it's pretty bold of Petshopboys to even consider a comparison between the apples and oranges that are The Beatles and Oasis.

I had no idea Oasis was still a band.  They had those two good songs...actually one in my opinion because wonderwall sucked.

Ya Radiohead ia an acquired taste....seems a lot of people like them though. I like "different" over "the usual" any day of the week.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 07:50:04 PM
I don't have a list of "great" bands as my musical tastes span a huge gap.
Oasis, radiohead, verve, etc. always sounded like a bunch of whining to me. No memorable songs or sounds to keep my interest.

Youtube "planet telex live"
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 03, 2013, 07:53:48 PM
I don't get Radiohead. Critics seem to, but they're a mystery to me. Pink Floyd, too, I don't get it.  








I am right there with you. I have made an honest attempt at seeing why Pink Floyd is considered one of the "greats." Lyrically, musically, accounting for other bands of that era, etc......I simply can not.

I have one song of theirs downloaded...the Division Bell....and that's it.

However nobody can explain to me why they think they are great.....so I have to wonder if it's all hype with no substance, and everybody is just a sheep keeping up with the herd.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: chaos on November 03, 2013, 07:55:25 PM
Youtube "planet telex live"
Terrible. I lasted 2 minutes...I really tried but I just can't stand their sound.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 07:56:50 PM
I am right there with you. I have made an honest attempt at seeing why Pink Floyd is considered one of the "greats." Lyrically, musically, accounting for other bands of that era, etc......I simply can not.

I have one song of theirs downloaded...the Division Bell....and that's it.

However nobody can explain to me why they think they are great.....so I have to wonder if it's all hype with no substance, and everybody is just a sheep keeping up with the herd.

The Division bell isn't even real Floyd...anything after Roger Waters left is not Pink Floyd music.

Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: The Ugly on November 03, 2013, 07:57:03 PM
I am right there with you. I have made an honest attempt at seeing why Pink Floyd is considered one of the "greats." Lyrically, musically, accounting for other bands of that era, etc......I simply can not.

I have one song of theirs downloaded...the Division Bell....and that's it.

However nobody can explain to me why they think they are great.....so I have to wonder if it's all hype with no substance, and everybody is just a sheep keeping up with the herd.

To be honest, most of the people I knew/know into Floyd are stoners or otherwise impaired. Maybe you just gotta be high to enjoy them.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 07:58:11 PM
Terrible. I lasted 2 minutes...I really tried but I just can't stand their sound.

Ha ha...hey at least you gave it a shot..its cool...nickrlback is good music too..LOLOL  ;D

just goes to show you, I listen to that song everyday.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Shockwave on November 03, 2013, 08:01:06 PM
I don't have a list of "great" bands as my musical tastes span a huge gap.
Oasis, radiohead, verve, etc. always sounded like a bunch of whining to me. No memorable songs or sounds to keep my interest.
agreed on all counts. I dont get radiohead, I dont get floyd, I really dont get the grateful dead.

Although I tend to listen to a lot more metal than rock anymore.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: chaos on November 03, 2013, 08:01:17 PM
Ha ha...hey at least you gave it a shot..its cool...nickrlback is good music too..LOLOL  ;D

just goes to show you, I listen to that song everyday.
Who?
Right now I'm doing alot of country/southern rock type music, with some heavy stuff thrown in for the gym.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 08:04:10 PM
Who?
Right now I'm doing alot of country/southern rock type music, with some heavy stuff thrown in for the gym.

It makes sense bro... you're a normal..well adjusted guy.  I'm a fkng freakshow. ....of course I like Radiohead...LOL

Nickelback was a joke  ;D
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: GraniteCityDon on November 03, 2013, 08:05:36 PM
I'd like to think that had the Beatles come about in the 90's they would infact have sounded just Oasis. Its all about progression, Beatles music is ok to listen to on Smooth FM on a Sunday afternoon but who makes that anymore?! Nobody. Music will always evolve, i think Definitely Maybe was the natural progression from what the Beatles were doing and what they would have done at that time.

Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: chaos on November 03, 2013, 08:08:12 PM
It makes sense bro... you're a normal..well adjusted guy.  I'm a fkng freakshow. ....of course I like Radiohead...LOL

Nickelback was a joke  ;D
Most of the stuff I listen to is small time bands, probably never here them on a radio. Although I don't listen to the radio so they might be top 10 bands......wtf do I know? ;D
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 08:15:21 PM
Most of the stuff I listen to is small time bands, probably never here them on a radio. Although I don't listen to the radio so they might be top 10 bands......wtf do I know? ;D

LOL.

Here's a related stupid thing I do....I hate having to see which earbud is left and which is right ...so I put a different color ear cushion on the right one...ha ha.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: chaos on November 03, 2013, 08:21:11 PM
I got the "athletic" earbuds, they only go right/left with the hook around the ear.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 03, 2013, 08:27:57 PM
The Division bell isn't even real Floyd...anything after Roger Waters left is not Pink Floyd music.



Maybe that is why I enjoy that song then.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 03, 2013, 08:36:48 PM
I got the "athletic" earbuds, they only go right/left with the hook around the ear.


Ah.

I'm on my backup pair, we got a new dog... And the little fuck face ate my headphones
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Army of One on November 04, 2013, 06:47:52 AM
I had no idea Oasis was still a band.  They had those two good songs...actually one in my opinion because wonderwall sucked.


Lol, your opinion is invalid since you think they had 2 good songs, you just exposed yourself as only listening to what's on popular radio/billboard 100.Try branching out on your own and listening to full albums!
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BigCyp on November 04, 2013, 06:55:57 AM
Lol, your opinion is invalid since you think they had 2 good songs, you just exposed yourself as only listening to what's on popular radio/billboard 100.Try branching out on your own and listening to full albums!

If trolling, good post. If serious, you've greatly underestimated Groink's musical ear.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Tito24 on November 04, 2013, 07:08:35 AM
i hate oasis, crap music
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: CalvinH on November 04, 2013, 07:37:39 AM
Who?
Right now I'm doing alot of country/southern rock type music, with some heavy stuff thrown in for the gym.


My brother is a awesome guitar player who has played with or opened for all the classic southern bands back in the day,,,Skynyrd,Allmans,Tucker, and Hatchet 8)
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 04, 2013, 07:43:27 AM
There is an absolute hilarious irony with that.

I'll just say kudos to those that actually know who the pet shop boys are.  8) Ahhh.....the good ol days........

Even Paul McCartney has said nice things about the Pet Shop Boys

Listen to our track "I get along " 2002

Experts says there's a lot of the "Beatles fresh sound"  in it... (including Ringo)


Enjoy :





WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH H
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Man of Steel on November 04, 2013, 07:44:48 AM
I know Beatles are Gods among mortals.  With 27 number one hits.

But pick their 5 best songs compared them with Oasis 5 best. 

I'm going with Oasis. Easily.

1-live forever
2-don't look back in anger
3-sad song
4-wonder wall
5- champaign supernova.




Wooosssshhhhhhhh



Wooossshhhhhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on November 04, 2013, 07:46:55 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=504647.0;attach=541043;image)

Lol    That would be the expression of Kanye West, lil Wayne fans and Bieber fans



Woooossshhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh hhhh
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: BikiniSlut on November 04, 2013, 08:14:26 AM
Even Paul McCartney has said nice things about the Pet Shop Boys

Listen to our track "I get along " 2002

Experts says there's a lot of the "Beatles fresh sound"  in it... (including Ringo)


Enjoy :


Well I'm convinced.  ::)










Hahahahahahaha oh stop it you! :D






WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH H
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: local hero on November 04, 2013, 09:30:09 AM
ive got to admit i was never an oasis fan, always thought Liam was a big twat...

who said somthing about us brits needing oasis because you had grunge?, we were all raving back then, its only took you lot 2 decades to catch on....

you can only compare the beatles with the stones... and for me it would be the stones hands down, they made some real crap, but amongst the crap are some amazing songs, paint it black etc etc
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Ronnie Rep on November 04, 2013, 10:09:01 AM
Oasis are OK, found the fighting between the Gallagher brothers entertaining.

As far as Radiohead goes the only song I have ever listened to by them is Creep!
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: MAXX on November 04, 2013, 10:12:47 AM
neither. both gayer than aids.
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: bigmc on November 04, 2013, 10:15:39 AM
ive got to admit i was never an oasis fan, always thought Liam was a big twat...

who said somthing about us brits needing oasis because you had grunge?, we were all raving back then, its only took you lot 2 decades to catch on....

you can only compare the beatles with the stones... and for me it would be the stones hands down, they made some real crap, but amongst the crap are some amazing songs, paint it black etc etc

first album was brilliant

second was decent

nothing since
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Palpatine Q on November 04, 2013, 11:38:31 AM
If trolling, good post. If serious, you've greatly underestimated Groink's musical ear.
I heard their first two records in their entirety...just like some people say they are "meh" when it comes to Radiohead...I'm "meh" when it comes to most bands. they all sound the same.  Oasis was ok..they had some good songs....but they are nothing special IMO


Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: SilverSpoon on November 04, 2013, 12:11:41 PM
Radiohead and Pink Floyd are more than likely my most listened to bands (along with Echo and the Bunnymen, Siouxsie and the Banshees, Smiths/Morrissey, Van Morrison and Peter Gabriel)

If you can listen to either OK Computer and/or Obscured by Clouds and not have a greater appreciation for both bands, I don't want to have a beer with you.

Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: gee38 on November 04, 2013, 03:12:12 PM
surely it should be


oasis vs stone roses
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: The Ugly on November 04, 2013, 05:39:29 PM
Radiohead and Pink Floyd are more than likely my most listened to bands (along with Echo and the Bunnymen, Siouxsie and the Banshees, Smiths/Morrissey, Van Morrison and Peter Gabriel)

If you can listen to either OK Computer and/or Obscured by Clouds and not have a greater appreciation for both bands, I don't want to have a beer with you.



Can we still have coffee?
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Pet shop boys on October 22, 2017, 06:22:11 PM
neither. both gayer than aids.

Tell that to Sir Paul McCartney to his face .




WooSHH TA NA KA
Title: Re: Beatles vs. oasis
Post by: Board_SHERIF on October 22, 2017, 06:25:19 PM
Oasis are OK, found the fighting between the Gallagher brothers entertaining.

As far as Radiohead goes the only song I have ever listened to by them is Creep!

Radiohead are one hit wonders, everything else they do is rubbish.