Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on August 08, 2014, 06:29:45 AM
-
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/08/chaldean-christian-leader-isis-is-beheading-children-in-iraq-video
-
U.S. Begins Strikes in Iraq, Pentagon Says
American warplanes struck Sunni militant positions in northern Iraq on Friday, the Pentagon said in a statement, confirming the first significant American military operation since ground troops left Iraq in 2011.
Rear Admiral John Kirby, the Pentagon Press Secretary, said that two F-18 fighters dropped 500-pound laser-guided bombs on a mobile artillery target near Erbil. Militants of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria were using the artillery to shell Kurdish forces defending Erbil, Admiral Kirby said in a statement.
The strike followed President Obama’s announcement Thursday night that he had authorized limited air strikes to protect American citizens in Erbil and Baghdad, and, if necessary, to break the siege of tens of thousand of refugees stranded on Mount Sinjar in northern Iraq.
READ MORE »
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/09/world/middleeast/iraq.html?emc=edit_na_20140808
-
Just muslims being muslims.
-
Just muslims being muslims.
so all muslims are the same,just what I'd expect from you ::)
-
so all muslims are the same,just what I'd expect from you ::)
Yes - 99% are utter filth and sludge
-
Yes - 99% are utter filth and sludge
that's like saying people who spend 24/7 on a political site crying about Obama are losers,mmmmmmmmm maybe your right :D :D :D
-
so all muslims are the same,just what I'd expect from you ::)
If they are not killing the infidel they are not being a practicing muslim. In Islam, the violent verses that were written by moo hammad, which are the first verses in the Koran and the longest writings in the Koran, supersede the "peaceful" ones. That is a fact.
Educate yourself, moron:
-
This should answer your question:
so all muslims are the same,just what I'd expect from you ::)
-
so all muslims are the same,just what I'd expect from you ::)
No of course not, just a staggeringly high percentage of them are. Its the nature of islam itself.
-
Muslim hospitality
-
If they are not killing the infidel they are not being a practicing muslim. In Islam, the violent verses that were written by moo hammad, which are the first verses in the Koran and the longest writings in the Koran, supersede the "peaceful" ones. That is a fact.
Educate yourself, moron:
so the practicing muslims in the u.s. that lived here all their lives are killing people :D :D :D you are fucking dumb.if a I was to think like you I would have to say you must be good at cutting lawns and picking vegetables
-
The hilarious thing about all this is that the same morons who condemn Christianity, who believe it to be a fairy tale are the same ones who defend Islam.
I would figure that they would hate all religions, but they defend Islam just to annoy Christians and Jews.
The thing is that atheists will be the first in line to get beheaded by Muslims.
-
so the practicing muslims in the u.s.
You are about as stupid as they come.
Practicing, when it comes to religion, means when a believer applies the doctrines of a religion to their own life. LIVING ACCORDING TO THE DOCTRINES OF THEIR RELIGION.
The Koran calls for its believers to kill the infidels or anyone who doesn't submit to Islam. Those verses supersede the peaceful verses because those violent verses were the last revelations from Allah to moo hammad.
Therefore, the mooslims in America who are not actively seeking to forcibly convert people to their religion or who don't believe that Islam should be the only religion in the world are not obeying moo hammad. They are not TRUE MULIMS. Not according to me., but according to their Koran.
Educate yourself, MORON.
-
You are about as stupid as they come.
Practicing, when it comes to religion, means when a believer applies the doctrines of a religion to their own life. LIVING ACCORDING TO THE DOCTRINES OF THEIR RELIGION.
The Koran calls for its believers to kill the infidels or anyone who doesn't submit to Islam. Those verses supersede the peaceful verses because those violent verses were the last revelations from Allah to moo hammad.
Therefore, the mooslims in America who are not actively seeking to forcibly convert people to their religion or who don't believe that Islam should be the only religion in the world are not obeying moo hammad. They are not TRUE MULIMS. Not according to me., but according to their Koran.
Educate yourself, MORON.
if a I was to think like you I would have to say you must be good at cutting lawns and picking vegetables, are you ???
-
if a I was to think like you I would have to say you must be good at cutting lawns and picking vegetables, are you ???
"if a I was"...what?
Try again, mental midget. What are you trying to state?
You don't know anything about any religion. It is not about what you think or what you would like to believe. If you want to understand what Islam is truly about you need to do some research on the Koran. To Muslims the Koran is the direct word of Allah. So it's not what you think, it's what the Koran says. It's not what "American mooslims" think, it's what the Koran states that they are supposed to do. If Koran is the word of Allah and they don't carry out what the Koran teaches, then they are not obeying Allah and are not practicing it's teachings.
Educate yourself, moron:
-
I'm painting everyone with a broad-brush like your doing,so i'll ask you again, are you good at cutting lawns and picking vegetables
-
No of course not, just a staggeringly high percentage of them are. Its the nature of islam itself.
+1
-
The hilarious thing about all this is that the same morons who condemn Christianity, who believe it to be a fairy tale are the same ones who defend it.
I would figure that they would hate all religions, but they defend Islam just to annoy Christians and Jews.
The thing is that atheists will be the first in line to get beheaded by Muslims.
You see some sort of contradiction because people who think all religions are bullshit would still be in favor of freedom of religion, do ya?
I'm thinking you're either from Cuba or Central America. Amirite?
-
Muslim hospitality
Fucking scum. Smear the Koran with Pig Blood.
-
Look at the morons on this thread. Whore, blackass, and rrsnore ignoring the obvious. Bunch of idiots.
Just listen what this practicing mooslim has to say about the so called "moderates". He clearly states that any one who doesn't believe in sharia law is not a practicing mooslim because that is what the Koran demands. The Koran is the word of Allah. So how can anyone who disobeys Allah be considered a "practicing mooslim"?
"Muslim is the one who submits to the command of the creator."
Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah"
-
send this Bastard to Allah with the Koran stuck down his throat.
-
Funny how gay libs and leftists show more anger towards republicans who tolerate their bullshit than they do the actual muslim butchers who would chop their heads off
-
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2014/08/chaldean-christian-leader-isis-is-beheading-children-in-iraq-video
Napalm is what they need .
-
;)
-
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/08/11/thats-my-boy-islamic-state-fighter-tweets-photo-of-his-son-holding-a-severed-head
This is who libfags defend
-
Your fucking head can't be wired right if you have no problem cutting off heads, especially of children
-
I'm painting everyone with a broad-brush like your doing,so i'll ask you again, are you good at cutting lawns and picking vegetables
the problem is that you pick and choose who to paint with a broad brush and you look to the liberal media on your tv to tell you who its ok to paint with said broad brush.
if i'm wrong I would see tons of threads with you defending Christianity............ I don't. because you have been conditioned NOT to defend them. you're behaving like a perfect little TV manufactured soldier.
-
Look at the morons on this thread. Whore, blackass, and rrsnore ignoring the obvious. Bunch of idiots.
Just listen what this practicing mooslim has to say about the so called "moderates". He clearly states that any one who doesn't believe in sharia law is not a practicing mooslim because that is what the Koran demands. The Koran is the word of Allah. So how can anyone who disobeys Allah be considered a "practicing mooslim"?
"Muslim is the one who submits to the command of the creator."
Quran (8:39) - "And fight with them until there is no more fitna (disorder, unbelief) and religion should be only for Allah"
well that settles that,one guys view on a youtube video ::) so I'm I to think all christians are bigots because your a bigot
-
the problem is that you pick and choose who to paint with a broad brush and you look to the liberal media on your tv to tell you who its ok to paint with said broad brush.
if i'm wrong I would see tons of threads with you defending Christianity............ I don't. because you have been conditioned NOT to defend them. you're behaving like a perfect little TV manufactured soldier.
:D :D :D as soon as a see liberal media I know we are listening to a fox news viewer,really you should be the last one talking about perfect little TV manufactured soldier :D :D :D :D
-
Typical libfag pos - cant even bring yourself to admit what sludge and scum these animals are
-
:D :D :D as soon as a see liberal media I know we are listening to a fox news viewer,really you should be the last one talking about perfect little TV manufactured soldier :D :D :D :D
um no. because I actually agree with you on your view that not all Muslims are hate mongers and terrorists. i just find it funny that i never see you jump to the defense of Christians when they're unfairly targeted. you've been conditioned not to. and when someone calls you out on it, you call them a "FOX NEWS VIEWER!!!!!" and insult them like you've been taught to.
let me tell you a little secret. you don't have to agree with every hard line stance of the Democratic party. you'll still be a good little democrat if you think for yourself once in a while. its OK.
at ease soldier.
-
um no. because I actually agree with you on your view that not all Muslims are hate mongers and terrorists. i just find it funny that i never see you jump to the defense of Christians when they're unfairly targeted. you've been conditioned not to. and when someone calls you out on it, you call them a "FOX NEWS VIEWER!!!!!" and insult them like you've been taught to.
let me tell you a little secret. you don't have to agree with every hard line stance of the Democratic party. you'll still be a good little democrat if you think for yourself once in a while. its OK.
at ease soldier.
can you post one of the Christians when they're unfairly targeted posts so I can comment on it,thanks
-
can you post one of the Christians when they're unfairly targeted posts so I can comment on it,thanks
::)
-
well that settles that,one guys view on a youtube video ::) so I'm I to think all christians are bigots because your a bigot
Prove that the Koran verses which promote the killing of all infidels and that do not limit such actions to the time of Moohamed DO NOT SUPERSEDE the verses of supposed peace and you win the argument.
The prophet himself said so, moron.
-
Prove that the Koran verses which promote the killing of all infidels and that do not limit such actions to the time of Moohamed DO NOT SUPERSEDE the verses of supposed peace and you win the argument.
The prophet himself said so, moron.
Prophet.. ::) Pedophile scumbag you mean .
-
>:(
-
Your fucking head can't be wired right if you have no problem cutting off heads, especially of children
All in the Name of their fucking "Prophet". Goat fucking Rag Head perverted scum. drop a Bomb on them...
-
can you post one of the Christians when they're unfairly targeted posts so I can comment on it,thanks
you do understand we're in a thread right now where Muslims are cutting off Christian children's heads right? and you have been commenting the whole time............defendin g Muslims.
hmm. wow.
-
There is no defense of Muslims beheading people. It's savage, brutal, primitive etc...''
There are not to my knowledge instances of Christians beheading people in the modern times
However to think Most or 99% of Muslims or most of them are like this is ignorant beyond words. But i will try anyway.
It's shows you are a product of fear propaganda and have lost the ability to think objectively. Instead you regurgitate hateful talking points. You are a low life, stupid dumbass.
-
you do understand we're in a thread right now where Muslims are cutting off Christian children's heads right? and you have been commenting the whole time............defendin g Muslims.
hmm. wow.
yeah so,i'm not defending the muslims cutting off the heads or killing people,what I'm saying is not all of them do this shit.just showing the bigot Dario,what a bigot he is.proofing the point there are idiots in every religion
-
Where are the "moderate" muslims speaking out about this being done in their name?
-
There is no defense of Muslims beheading people. It's savage, brutal, primitive etc...''
There are not to my knowledge instances of Christians beheading people in the modern times
However to think Most or 99% of Muslims or most of them are like this is ignorant beyond words. But i will try anyway.
It's shows you are a product of fear propaganda and have lost the ability to think objectively. Instead you regurgitate hateful talking points. You are a low life, stupid dumbass.
He's talking to you, RetarDario, ya scared little hate-filled foreign-born pussy.
-
There is no defense of Muslims beheading people. It's savage, brutal, primitive etc...''
There are not to my knowledge instances of Christians beheading people in the modern times
However to think Most or 99% of Muslims or most of them are like this is ignorant beyond words. But i will try anyway.
It's shows you are a product of fear propaganda and have lost the ability to think objectively. Instead you regurgitate hateful talking points. You are a low life, stupid dumbass.
::)
No one is saying 99% of muslims are terrorists.
But pretending like there isnt something inherently very wrong with islam, and to ignore the fact that there is clearly a disturbingly high percentage of them that tend to be violent fanatics relative to the quiet ones, if just playing the PC card and living in liberal fantasyland like an apologist coward.
-
::)
No one is saying 99% of muslims are terrorists.
But pretending like there isnt something inherently very wrong with islam, and to ignore the fact that there is clearly a disturbingly high percentage of them that tend to be violent fanatics relative to the quiet ones, if just playing the PC card and living in liberal fantasyland like an apologist coward.
What's a high percentage? Can you back your claim with actual facts?
1%? 5%? 10%? 33%? 50%?
The actions of these violent fanatics should be dealt with swiftly and condemn readily. I think most liberals would agree, but most of them prolly wouldn't agree 5-99% of Muslin are violent fanatics.
To think that: more than 1-5% of them are that way is a product of fear propaganda.
Take Kabul for example. If there are 1 million people in Kabul, 50,000 of them are violent fanatics? Doubt it. There are probably a couple of thousand laying very low. 50K would make it an active war zone.
-
What's a high percentage? Can you back your claim with actual facts?
1%? 5%? 10%? 33%? 50%?
The actions of these violent fanatics should be dealt with swiftly and condemn readily. I think most liberals would agree, but most of them prolly wouldn't agree 5-99% of Muslin are violent fanatics.
To think that: more than 1-5% of them are that way is a product of fear propaganda.
Take Kabul for example. If there are 1 million people in Kabul, 50,000 of them are violent fanatics? Doubt it. There are probably a couple of thousand laying very low. 50K would make it an active war zone.
There is of course no way to know the exact percentage. The point is is that it is clearly very, very high for muslims, especially when compared to other religions. Trying to downplay or ignore this does not help.
There is something inherent in islam itself which drives this phenomenon. Mohammed himself was a warlord who spread islam by the sword far and wide. Every corner of the world where islam spreads, carnage tends to follow; one of its basic core values is to spread islam, to make the whole world islamic, and to not take no for an answer lol
-
There is of course no way to know the exact percentage. The point is is that it is clearly very, very high for muslims, especially when compared to other religions. Trying to downplay or ignore this does not help.
There is something inherent in islam itself which drives this phenomenon. Mohammed himself was a warlord who spread islam by the sword far and wide. Every corner of the world where islam spreads, carnage tends to follow; one of its basic core values is to spread islam, to make the whole world islamic, and to not take no for an answer lol
What's very high?
And if its so "clearly high" as you say, shouldn't there be a way to know a ball park percentage?
I don't think most people ignore there are violent religiously motivated people bent on our destruction. Even the extreme liberals. Also, that the culture of some of these Muslims is of a violent 13th century nature when it comes to conforming to a religion or dealing with problems.
What many caution is lending our selves into false assumptions about all Muslims and labeling them. For example: Thinking that a disturbingly high percentage of them are violent fanatics but have no way of even ball parking that percentage.
-
Whatever percentage it is - its obviously higher than anywhere else correct? ;)
-
Whatever percentage it is - its obviously higher than anywhere else correct? ;)
What many caution is lending our selves into false assumptions about all Muslims and labeling them. For example: Thinking that a disturbingly high percentage of them are violent fanatics but have no way of even ball parking that percentage.
-
Ozmo, check out the article i posted in a thread further down the politics board. Its a quick good read
-
Ozmo, check out the article i posted in a thread further down the politics board. Its a quick good read
ok
-
Whatever percentage it is - its obviously higher than anywhere else correct? ;)
you tell them buddy.... ;)
-
Here is a great, short talk by a woman talking about Radical Islam. I don't know if her numbers are accurate, but she sounds like she's knows what she's talking about.
About 180 to 300 million extremists determined to destroy Western civilization.
-
Ozmo, check out the article i posted in a thread further down the politics board. Its a quick good read
You have written about conceptual failures dominating the Western discourse on Islam. What are the main fallacies and why are they dangerous?
Along with the aforementioned fallacy of projecting Christian/Western worldviews onto a distinctly different religion/civilization like Islam, secular Westerners almost always try to understand Islam through secular and materialistic paradigms—the only paradigms they themselves are familiar with. Thus the mainstream interpretation in the West is that “radical Islam” is a byproduct of various sorts of material discontent (economic, political, social) and has little to do with the religion itself.
Westerners apparently think this way because the secular, Western experience has been such that people respond with violence primarily when they feel they are politically, economically, or socially oppressed. While true that many non-Western peoples fit into this paradigm, the fact is, the ideologies of Islam have the intrinsic capacity to prompt Muslims to violence and intolerance vis-à-vis the “other,” irrespective of grievances.
Conceptually, then, it must be first understood that many of the problematic ideologies associated with radical Islam trace directly back to Sharia, Islamic law. Jihad as offensive warfare to subjugate “infidels” (non-Muslims); mandated social discrimination against non-Muslim minorities living in Muslim nations (the regulations governing ahl al-dhimma); the obligation to hate non-Muslims—even if a Muslim is married to one—all of these are clearly defined aspects that have historically been part of Islam’s worldview and not “open to interpretation.”
For example, the obligation to wage expansionist jihad is as “open to interpretation” as the obligation to perform the Five Pillars of Islam, including praying and fasting. The same textual sources and methods of jurisprudence that have made it clear that prayer and fasting are obligatory, have also made it clear that jihad is also obligatory; the only difference is that, whereas prayer and fasting is an “individual” duty, jihad is understood to be a “communal” duty (a fard kifaya). All these intricacies must be understood before Westerners can understand Islam on its own terms
I see what's he's getting at and I don't think he makes a very good case here. If true (in bold) there would be much much violence everywhere in the world. However, if i remember right, Sharia law and Islam are 2 different things. I do see that in certain instances people are encouraged to do these things. But is it Main stream modern Modern Muslim culture? I don't think so.
-
Here is a great, short talk by a woman talking about Radical Islam. I don't know if her numbers are accurate, but she sounds like she's knows what she's talking about.
About 180 to 300 million extremists determined to destroy Western civilization.
Sounds like an opinion.
What are the facts?
How many Muslims practice Radical Islam, how many of those are willing to carry our acts of violence or are actively engaging in acts of violence?
-
Sounds like an opinion.
What are the facts?
How many Muslims practice Radical Islam, how many of those are willing to carry our acts of violence or are actively engaging in acts of violence?
She said intelligence reports show about 180 to 300 million extremists are determined to destroy Western civilization. I haven't seen the reports, so I don't know if those numbers are accurate, and they are estimates anyway, so you're not going to get definitive numbers one way or the other.
-
Sounds like an opinion.
What are the facts?
How many Muslims practice Radical Islam, how many of those are willing to carry our acts of violence or are actively engaging in acts of violence?
The fucking answer is TOO FUCKING MANY!!!
How dense are you?
-
She said intelligence reports show about 180 to 300 million extremists are determined to destroy Western civilization. I haven't seen the reports, so I don't know if those numbers are accurate, and they are estimates anyway, so you're not going to get definitive numbers one way or the other.
I never thought there would be an exact number. 180-300 million is a HUGE variance. "we could be off by 120 million people" or 66% ::) Sounds like a inept "intelligence report"
FEAR PROPAGANDA at its finest. Like those "classified presentations of Russia's military might" they showed to service men in the 80's.
-
The fucking answer is TOO FUCKING MANY!!!
How dense are you?
quite a bit less dense than a birther. ;)
-
quite a bit less dense than a birther. ;)
Tell that to the thousands of people being beheaded by Obama's buddies
-
I never thought there would be an exact number. 180-300 million is a HUGE variance. "we could be off by 120 million people" or 66% ::) Sounds like a inept "intelligence report"
FEAR PROPAGANDA at its finest. Like those "classified presentations of Russia's military might" they showed to service men in the 80's.
I agree that is a huge variance, but what if the number is only 10 million? Still a heck of a lot of people who want to kill Americans.
How can you dismiss what she is saying as fear propaganda? Radical Islam is a threat. No two ways about it.
-
Brigitte Gabriel is a hatemonger,Gabriel expressed concern over Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) being the first Muslim elected to Congress. Gabriel asserted that Ellison’s victory is indicative of “how the infiltration of Muslims who are foxes in sheep’s clothing who have infiltrated” not only the government but “every aspect of our society.” Later in the interview Gabriel expressed “we need to scrutinize every Muslim running for office.” -
-
I agree that is a huge variance, but what if the number is only 10 million? Still a heck of a lot of people who want to kill Americans.
How can you dismiss what she is saying as fear propaganda? Radical Islam is a threat. No two ways about it.
Because Ozmo is a typical Californication lib - head in the sand like an ostrich. These radical islamists have said their goal is a pn islamist caliphate to base 9/11 attacks from on the West. apparently that is not enough for an Obama voter like ozmo
-
I agree that is a huge variance, but what if the number is only 10 million? Still a heck of a lot of people who want to kill Americans.
How can you dismiss what she is saying as far propaganda? Radical Islam is a threat. No two ways about it.
Yeah, there are several ways about it!
Claiming there 180-300 million wanting to kill you based on "unverified or uncited" facts with a variance of 120 million people IS fear propaganda. Simple common sense. But most people have already made up their minds, and therefore just regurgitate fear based talking points, such as: "Huge percentage"
If she said "Several interdependent studies have have shown that there are up to XXXXXXX radical Muslims willing to commit acts of violence. you can find the details of these studies at XXXXX" Then her statements can be verified. But she says "intelligence studies" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Then the obvious........... 180 Million? We'd be in a world war right now. ::)
-
Tell that to the thousands of people being beheaded by Obama's buddies
You are the only that needs to hear it.
-
Because Ozmo is a typical Californication lib - head in the sand like an ostrich. These radical islamists have said their goal is a pn islamist caliphate to base 9/11 attacks from on the West. apparently that is not enough for an Obama voter like ozmo
There fore 99% of Muslims have the same goal. And Obama is a Kenyan sleeper Commy Muslim Terrorist Agent (and EVERYONE both the GOP and Dems are in on the conspiracy!) who going to drop out of reelection and or lose it by a LANDSLIDE right?
You are so smart SC, so right all the time.
People should just listen to you all the time right?
-
How on earth do you expect anyone to be able to calculate an accurate number?? ::)
You are totally beating around the bush here and being difficult on purpose. Name one other religion where you have large groups slaughtering people all over the world in the name of that religion.
-
There fore 99% of Muslims have the same goal. And Obama is a Kenyan sleeper Commy Muslim Terrorist Agent (and EVERYONE both the GOP and Dems are in on the conspiracy!) who going to drop out of reelection and or lose it by a LANDSLIDE right?
You are so smart SC, so right all the time.
People should just listen to you all the time right?
STFU - is there anywhere or anyone else in the world doing this bs whoproclaims their mission is to kill us but these radical jihadis and islamist scum? Name one
-
Yeah, there are several ways about it!
Claiming there 180-300 million wanting to kill you based on "unverified or uncited" facts with a variance of 120 million people IS fear propaganda. Simple common sense. But most people have already made up their minds, and therefore just regurgitate fear based talking points, such as: "Huge percentage"
If she said "Several interdependent studies have have shown that there are up to XXXXXXX radical Muslims willing to commit acts of violence. you can find the details of these studies at XXXXX" Then her statements can be verified. But she says "intelligence studies" HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Then the obvious........... 180 Million? We'd be in a world war right now. ::)
According to "Muslim apologists," the number is only 7 percent of 1.5 billion. I'm math challenged, but I think that still amounts to 105 million people? http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Are_the_Overwhelming_Majority_of_Muslims_Peaceful_Moderates ("The authors claim only 7 percent of the world's Muslims are 'political radicals'.")
I could probably find several other sources that say the same thing, but you would dismiss them because you have your mind made up about this.
We are at war, but you probably don't believe the war on terror exists, or that most terrorists who want to kill us are Radical Islamists. That's just the truth.
We're not in a conventional war, because they don't have a conventional Army.
-
STFU - is there anywhere or anyone else in the world doing this bs whoproclaims their mission is to kill us but these radical jihadis and islamist scum? Name one
I guess the religions are taking there turns in history at killing
-
I guess the religions are taking there turns in history at killing
So because others behaved poorly in the past - lets just lets these islamist beats and animals run wild and then when the next group of fuck faces come along make excuses for them too right you stupid morally bankrupt and incompetent idiot?
-
they kill for their god
-
they kill for their god
And you make excuses for them like the good little commie lib you are
-
what are going to do they have weak minds
-
Brigitte Gabriel is a hatemonger,Gabriel expressed concern over Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) being the first Muslim elected to Congress. Gabriel asserted that Ellison’s victory is indicative of “how the infiltration of Muslims who are foxes in sheep’s clothing who have infiltrated” not only the government but “every aspect of our society.” Later in the interview Gabriel expressed “we need to scrutinize every Muslim running for office.” -
Don't like the message so immediately attack the messenger. She speaks the truth in that clip.
-
How on earth do you expect anyone to be able to calculate an accurate number?? ::)
You are totally beating around the bush here and being difficult on purpose. Name one other religion where you have large groups slaughtering people all over the world in the name of that religion.
If there isn't a way to calculate an accurate number then how can you claim a "High Percentage" are? Plus i am not asking for a accurate number...........if you have been reading some of my posts.
But there should be a legit study to show a percentage WITHOUT a variance of 120 million people.
-
STFU - is there anywhere or anyone else in the world doing this bs whoproclaims their mission is to kill us but these radical jihadis and islamist scum? Name one
Why so mad?
Just showing you how right you always are about evrey thing.
-
If there isn't a way to calculate an accurate number then how can you claim a "High Percentage" are? Plus i am not asking for a accurate number...........if you have been reading some of my posts.
But there should be a legit study to show a percentage WITHOUT a variance of 120 million people.
If its only 3% of a Billion - do the FNG math - and these fuckers are acting on it while the other 97% sit silent and don't do dick to stop it
-
Don't like the message so immediately attack the messenger. She speaks the truth in that clip.
it shows her credibility, where she stands, her agenda,sorry if that bothers you :D :D :D
-
According to "Muslim apologists," the number is only 7 percent of 1.5 billion. I'm math challenged, but I think that still amounts to 105 million people? http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Are_the_Overwhelming_Majority_of_Muslims_Peaceful_Moderates ("The authors claim only 7 percent of the world's Muslims are 'political radicals'.")
I could probably find several other sources that say the same thing, but you would dismiss them because you have your mind made up about this.
We are at war, but you probably don't believe the war on terror exists, or that most terrorists who want to kill us are Radical Islamists. That's just the truth.
We're not in a conventional war, because they don't have a conventional Army.
Is 75-195 million less a big difference?
So saying: "intelligence sources" say 180-300 IS fear propaganda when there are other studies without a huge variance and that differ from the "ambiguous", unverified, uncited, un supported intelligence studies
Another consideration to the "Muslim Apologist" study from wiki is whether or not these Radical Muslims are willing to commit acts of violence and whether or not they are presently or in the past been engaged in acts of violence.
If 180 million were engaged or have been engaged in violence over the last 10 years just 1 time, that would be 4931 acts of violence per day. WORLD WAR!
Its complete IGNORANCE to think:
- 180-300 million is an legit study
- Not take into consideration whether or not they are intending or have been engaged in violence and assume all radical islam is hell bent on violence.
DETAILS AND DISTINCTIONS!
-
If its only 3% of a Billion - do the FNG math - and these fuckers are acting on it while the other 97% sit silent and don't do dick to stop it
According to you we should be communist country run under the OB Kenyan Dictatorship that lost the election by a LANDSLIDE by now.
So, i would be careful what i post from now on. I might report you to the OB thugs (secret police)
-
it shows her credibility, where she stands, her agenda,sorry if that bothers you :D :D :D
It doesn't bother me at all. I just think it's funny that you immediately tried to discredit the messenger, solely because she said something that doesn't fit your narrative.
-
Is 75-195 million less a big difference?
So saying: "intelligence sources" say 180-300 IS fear propaganda when there are other studies without a huge variance and that differ from the "ambiguous", unverified, uncited, un supported intelligence studies
Another consideration to the "Muslim Apologist" study from wiki is whether or not these Radical Muslims are willing to commit acts of violence and whether or not they are presently or in the past been engaged in acts of violence.
If 180 million were engaged or have been engaged in violence over the last 10 years just 1 time, that would be 4931 acts of violence per day. WORLD WAR!
Its complete IGNORANCE to think:
- 180-300 million is an legit study
- Not take into consideration whether or not they are intending or have been engaged in violence and assume all radical islam is hell bent on violence.
DETAILS AND DISTINCTIONS!
HAIRS AND SPLITTING!
Sorry, I never use all caps, but I just thought it was funny. :)
As I said, I don't know what intelligence sources she was referring too show, but it sounds like there are numerous reports, so it doesn't surprise me that the numbers vary, particularly when you cannot just take a census to find out the numbers. But given the fact that even sympathizers put the number at 7 percent means we are talking about an incredibly large number of people.
What do you think the number or range of Radical Islamists is?
-
It doesn't bother me at all. I just think it's funny that you immediately tried to discredit the messenger, solely because she said something that doesn't fit your narrative.
really never heard of her,wanted to see what she was about,unlike you I'm not going to believe everything I hear just because it fits my narrative :D
-
really never heard of her,wanted to see what she was about,unlike you I'm not going to believe everything I hear just because it fits my narrative :D
Riiight. So you just did a generic search and up pops a sentence calling her a hate monger? lol
I've never heard of her either. What she is saying fits the facts. As an American, you should be concerned about this.
-
HAIRS AND SPLITTING!
Sorry, I never use all caps, but I just thought it was funny. :)
As I said, I don't know what intelligence sources she was referring too, but it sounds like there are numerous reports, so it doesn't surprise me that the numbers vary, particularly when you cannot just take a census to find out the numbers. But given the fact that even sympathizers put the number at 7 percent means we are talking about an incredibly large number of people.
What do you think the number or range of Radical Islamists is?
its cool, i just use it to emphasize. :)
i don't know what the number is. But like i said, there are other details to consider no matter what the number is or averages out to be.
Point being, the fear propaganda would have you believe that there are 180 million people wanting to commit acts of violence. If they just did it once in ten years that nearly 5000 a day.
that doesn't seem realistic.
When it comes to demonizing an entire group of people, splitting hairs is important.
-
its cool, i just use it to emphasize. :)
i don't know what the number is. But like i said, there are other details to consider no matter what the number is or averages out to be.
Point being, the fear propaganda would have you believe that there are 180 million people wanting to commit acts of violence. If they just did it once in ten years that nearly 5000 a day.
that doesn't seem realistic.
When it comes to demonizing an entire group of people, splitting hairs is important.
I will demonize this group because the acts being done in their name are so freaking barbaric and horrific that if they don't speak out against it - they are either callous to it or accepting of it - neither of which is ok,
-
its cool, i just use it to emphasize. :)
i don't know what the number is. But like i said, there are other details to consider no matter what the number is or averages out to be.
Point being, the fear propaganda would have you believe that there are 180 million people wanting to commit acts of violence. If they just did it once in ten years that nearly 5000 a day.
that doesn't seem realistic.
When it comes to demonizing an entire group of people, splitting hairs is important.
You have no idea what the number is? Large? Small?
-
I will demonize this group because the acts being done in their name are so freaking barbaric and horrific that if they don't speak out against it - they are either callous to it or accepting of it - neither of which is ok,
SC speaks..... prepare for the LANDSLIDE!
-
You have no idea what the number is? Large? Small?
Hard to believe its 180 million..... 5000 acts of violence a day
plus the other details i've stated a few times already.
Doesn't add up.
-
SC speaks..... prepare for the LANDSLIDE!
Yeah you stupid F - even the WaPO said today GOP all but guaranteed to take over the Senate - cuntlosi no hope in taking back the house, etc.
So that jihadi pos YOU VOTED FOR POTUS will thankfully get zero done
-
Hard to believe its 180 million..... 5000 acts of violence a day
plus the other details i've stated a few times already.
Doesn't add up.
Ok, but how large of a threat do you think we are dealing with? Sort of hard to take such a strong position on the numbers when you don't even have an idea of what the number should be. Or do you?
-
Ok, but how large of a threat do you think we are dealing with? Sort of hard to take such a strong position on the numbers when you don't even have an idea of what the number should be. Or do you?
The threat is ZERO. Palin and W and Fox News are more a threat
-
Yeah you stupid F - even the WaPO said today GOP all but guaranteed to take over the Senate - cuntlosi no hope in taking back the house, etc.
So that jihadi pos YOU VOTED FOR POTUS will thankfully get zero done
SC Speaks, the world listens! He's 100% right, 1.5% of the time.
-
Ok, but how large of a threat do you think we are dealing with? Sort of hard to take such a strong position on the numbers when you don't even have an idea of what the number should be. Or do you?
We can start with what they are not, then proceed to what they are likely not.
They are not 180-300 million people intending to commit acts of violence on non-Muslims
They are likely not a "High percentage"
It is likely NOT all Radical Muslims mean to commitment acts of violence.
Somewhere out there there is a ball park number based on studies that shows the amount of radical Muslims intending (with ability) or have committed acts of violence against non-Muslims. and I am sure that's not 105 Million.
-
SC Speaks, the world listens! He's 100% right, 1.5% of the time.
Of course - obamacare is great - economy roaring, Obama is popular as ever, border secure, etc. ;)
-
We can start with what they are not, then proceed to what they are likely not.
They are not 180-300 million people intending to commit acts of violence on non-Muslims
They are likely not a "High percentage"
It is likely NOT all Radical Muslims mean to commitment acts of violence.
Somewhere out there there is a ball park number based on studies that shows the amount of radical Muslims intending (with ability) or have committed acts of violence against non-Muslims. and I am sure that's not 105 Million.
I gave you a link where people who are "apologists" put the number at 7 percent of 1.5 billion. What I'm asking is what you believe the number to be? Not an exact figure, but a range.
Assume it's not 15 to 25 percent. That's fine. What do you think the number is?
-
I gave you a link where people who are "apologists" put the number at 7 percent of 1.5 billion. What I'm asking is what you believe the number to be? Not an exact figure, but a range.
Assume it's not 15 to 25 percent. That's fine. What do you think the number is?
There are other issues i brought up that factor into the charge.
-
Of course - obamacare is great - economy roaring, Obama is popular as ever, border secure, etc. ;)
As you say.
-
There are other issues i brought up that factor into the charge.
What is your number or range?
-
What is your number or range?
Told ya already.
-
Told ya already.
I went back and read your posts. No, you didn't. You just said it's not the numbers from the clip I posted. You didn't say what you think the number or range actually is. What do you think it is?
-
I went back and read your posts. No, you didn't. You just said it's not the numbers from the clip I posted. You didn't say what you think the number or range actually is. What do you think it is?
What do I think what is?
# of radical islamists? Or # of radical Islamist willing, engaged or previously engaged in violence against non Muslims? Or # that support implementing sharia law through violent means?
-
What do I think what is?
# of radical islamists? Or # of radical Islamist willing, engaged or previously engaged in violence against non Muslims? Or # that support implementing sharia law through violent means?
The number of Racial Islamists.
-
The number of Racial Islamists.
How are they defined as radical Islamists?
-
How are they defined as radical Islamists?
What is your definition? Who are you, Jack T. Cross?? lol :)
-
What is your definition? Who are you, Jack T. Cross?? lol :)
Hahaha. ;D. You are the one asking me what I think. I just want to be able to give you an accurate answer about what you are asking me.
-
Hahaha. ;D. You are the one asking me what I think. I just want to be able to give you an accurate answer about what you are asking me.
Ok. Fair enough. Let's use the definition I pulled off the internet: "While professing unwavering faith in a transcendent deity, radical Islam is a militant, politically activist ideology whose ultimate goal is to create a worldwide community, or caliphate, of Muslim believers."
I'd add that these people believe you either convert or die and are willing to use violence to make it happen.
-
Ok. Fair enough. Let's use the definition I pulled off the internet: "While professing unwavering faith in a transcendent deity, radical Islam is a militant, politically activist ideology whose ultimate goal is to create a worldwide community, or caliphate, of Muslim believers."
I'd add that these people believe you either convert or die and are willing to use violence to make it happen.
It doesn't say: "these people believe you either convert or die and are willing to use violence to make it happen." in the definition you provided.
-
Beach Bum and Soul Crusher doing a fine Job on this Thread. OzmO does the same thing time and time again. so predictable. He should wake up and smell the Coffee.. ::)
-
Beach Bum and Soul Crusher doing a fine Job on this Thread. OzmO does the same thing time and time again. so predictable. He should wake up and smell the Coffee.. ::)
Lol. Not surprised you see it that way. Grainy images without detail prove things to you just as stereotyping a group of people.
-
Lol. Not surprised you see it that way. Grainy images without detail prove things to you just as stereotyping a group of people.
go back to Bed :-*
-
go back to Bed :-*
lol go back to making tin foil hats. They are simple enough for you to understand. Politics is way over your head.
-
lol go back to making tin foil hats. They are simple enough for you to understand. Politics is way over your head.
you´re upset. Write when you´ve recovered.
-
you´re upset. Write when you´ve recovered.
upset about what?
amused.
-
upset about what?
amused.
Reeling you in like a fish ;)
-
Reeling you in like a fish ;)
How?
I always have a little time for your nonsense. You are amusing.
-
http://www.westernjournalism.com/isis-beheading-children-crucifying-youths
Ozmo - the answer is zero - no muslims at all are jihadist or killers
-
http://www.westernjournalism.com/isis-beheading-children-crucifying-youths
Ozmo - the answer is zero - no muslims at all are jihadist or killers
Who is saying no Muslims at all are Jihadists or killers?
Makes wonder which is more moronic..... People that say no Muslims are killers or people who think people who never have said that did say that. Peas in a pod.
-
http://www.westernjournalism.com/isis-beheading-children-crucifying-youths
Ozmo - the answer is zero - no muslims at all are jihadist or killers
don't encourage the boy .. ;D
-
Who is saying no Muslims at all are Jihadists or killers?
Makes wonder which is more moronic..... People that say no Muslims are killers or people who think people who never have said that did say that. Peas in a pod.
are you high ? Confused?
-
Fine ozmo....
Islam is the religion of peace, its only a 'handful of knuckleheads' giving islam a bad name, anyone who suggests islam generates an unusually high percentage of violent fanatics is just being a hateful racist.
Is that what you want to hear? ::)
-
Fine ozmo....
Islam is the religion of peace, its only a 'handful of knuckleheads' giving islam a bad name, anyone who suggests islam generates an unusually high percentage of violent fanatics is just being a hateful racist.
Is that what you want to hear? ::)
That is what he wants to hear, but it would be a lie. Ozmo is a liar on this issue.
-
It doesn't say: "these people believe you either convert or die and are willing to use violence to make it happen." in the definition you provided.
Dude. You ask me for a definition then quibble with the definition I give you?
The line I added is based on what I have read and heard from talking to many people, including the book The Looming Tower. I've mentioned that book on the board many times, but if you want to learn more about this subject it's a great read. Really gives a behind the scenes look at how 911 happened.
In any event, what is your number or range?
-
Fine ozmo....
Islam is the religion of peace, its only a 'handful of knuckleheads' giving islam a bad name, anyone who suggests islam generates an unusually high percentage of violent fanatics is just being a hateful racist.
Is that what you want to hear? ::)
No, that's what you want to believe i believe, because to question anything, no matter how stupid the assumption maybe, automatically puts that person in that category.
Use your fucking head for once.
-
Dude. You ask me for a definition then quibble with the definition I give you?
The line I added is based on what I have read and heard from talking to many people, including the book The Looming Tower. I've mentioned that book on the board many times, but if you want to learn more about this subject it's a great read. Really gives a behind the scenes look at how 911 happened.
In any event, what is your number or range?
YES i will quibble over it because YOU added to the definition. And what YOU added is YOUR uneducated, un-researched, opinion based on hearing what you want to hear.
Do you believe all those who are radical islam intend to, are presently engaging in, or have in the past engaged in violent acts against non-muslims?
If so then 180 million (the LOW number) Radical Islamists in the last years committing 1 act of violence only, works out to about 5000 per day. Sorry I don't buy it. Seems like you are using your broad brush again,
-
That is what he wants to hear, but it would be a lie. Ozmo is a liar on this issue.
How am i liar Dario?
-
are you high ? Confused?
Are you just Trolling now?
-
YES i will quibble over it because YOU added to the definition. And what YOU added is YOUR uneducated, un-researched, opinion based on hearing what you want to hear.
Do you believe all those who are radical islam intend to, are presently engaging in, or have in the past engaged in violent acts against non-muslims?
If so then 180 million (the LOW number) Radical Islamists in the last years committing 1 act of violence only, works out to about 5000 per day. Sorry I don't buy it. Seems like you are using your broad brush again,
lol. I feel like I'm talking to Eric Holder:
Calling an opinion that is based on reading books on the subject and talking to numerous people who have spent years dealing with these people "uneducated and un-researched" is retarded. I tell you what, find an objective person who has spent a lot of time in the Middle East dealing with Muslims and Radical Islamists and talk to them about the subject. It might give you a different outlook. At worst, you'll become more enlightened on the subject.
But what is your definition and what is your number or range? If are going to refuse to answer just say so and I'll stop asking you. :)
-
lol. I feel like I'm talking to Eric Holder:
Calling an opinion that is based on reading books on the subject and talking to numerous people who have spent years dealing with these people "uneducated and un-researched" is retarded. I tell you what, find an objective person who has spent a lot of time in the Middle East dealing with Muslims and Radical Islamists and talk to them about the subject. It might give you a different outlook. At worst, you'll become more enlightened on the subject.
But what is your definition and what is your number or range? If are going to refuse to answer just say so and I'll stop asking you. :)
I am asking you: Do you believe all those who are radical islam intend to, are presently engaging in, or have in the past engaged in violent acts against non-muslims?
I have no problem condemning those who do violence and those who support violence against innocent people. But i will not categorize an entire group of people to a definition that doesn't apply to a significant percentage of them. Because that kind of thinking leads to the persecution of innocent people.
Its like saying all Christians hate Gays and want to limit their rights which both you and know isn't true.
PS i didn't watch the vid.
-
I am asking you: Do you believe all those who are radical islam intend to, are presently engaging in, or have in the past engaged in violent acts against non-muslims?
I have no problem condemning those who do violence and those who support violence against innocent people. But i will not categorize an entire group of people to a definition that doesn't apply to a significant percentage of them. Because that kind of thinking leads to the persecution of innocent people.
Its like saying all Christians hate Gays and want to limit their rights which both you and know isn't true.
PS i didn't watch the vid.
You answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I have never condemned an entire group of people. In fact, I often criticize people who try and label all Muslims. What I don't do is stick my head in the ground when it comes to Radical Islam.
You don't need to watch the two minute clip, but you sound just like Holder in that clip.
-
You answer my question and I'll answer yours.
I have never condemned an entire group of people. In fact, I often criticize people who try and label all Muslims. What I don't do is stick my head in the ground when it comes to Radical Islam.
You don't need to watch the two minute clip, but you sound just like Holder in that clip.
You are, labeling an entire group of people by what you added to the definition.
I don't stick my head in the sand on this either (contrary to what the local idiots who can't sustain a discussion with out stereotyping anyone that questions their assumptions). I, to my recollection, have never advocated we appease them, not carry out SpecOps, not deal with them ruthlessly, said 9/11 was our fault for persecuting them, etc.
There are people, these Islamic Radicals who very much want to kill us and are willing to die for that.
But NOT 180 million of them. There might be 105-300 million (more or less) of them who believe in the ideals of radical islam. But i seriously doubt they are all "soldiers" in thier quest. Because if they were, there would be constant violence far more than what we saw in Iraq at the height of the insurgency and it would be all over the world.
-
You are, labeling an entire group of people by what you added to the definition.
I don't stick my head in the sand on this either (contrary to what the local idiots who can't sustain a discussion with out stereotyping anyone that questions their assumptions). I, to my recollection, have never advocated we appease them, not carry out SpecOps, not deal with them ruthlessly, said 9/11 was our fault for persecuting them, etc.
There are people, these Islamic Radicals who very much want to kill us and are willing to die for that.
But NOT 180 million of them. There might be 105-300 million (more or less) of them who believe in the ideals of radical islam. But i seriously doubt they are all "soldiers" in thier quest. Because if they were, there would be constant violence far more than what we saw in Iraq at the height of the insurgency and it would be all over the world.
Ok. Thanks for answering. That was like pulling teeth. lol :)
To answer your question: "Do you believe all those who are radical islam intend to, are presently engaging in, or have in the past engaged in violent acts against non-muslims?"
I don't believe that all Radical Islamists are presently engaged in acts of violence. I do believe that all or a substantial majority of Radical Islamists would use violence if they had the means and opportunity. I believe the only reason we have not seen more acts of violence is they don't have the infrastructure or means to attack on a large scale and we have become much more diligent since 911 in stopping them.
It's a dangerous world mang.
-
Are you just Trolling now?
No you are a confused young man taking a beating on here...let us read what ex Muslims themselves say on this website. Why these moderate Muslims you talk about left this VILE Religion.
http://www.islam-watch.org/LeavingIslam/index.html
-
Ok. Thanks for answering. That was like pulling teeth. lol :)
To answer your question: "Do you believe all those who are radical islam intend to, are presently engaging in, or have in the past engaged in violent acts against non-muslims?"
I don't believe that all Radical Islamists are presently engaged in acts of violence. I do believe that all or a substantial majority of Radical Islamists would use violence if they had the means and opportunity. I believe the only reason we have not seen more acts of violence is they don't have the infrastructure or means to attack on a large scale and we have become much more diligent since 911 in stopping them.
It's a dangerous world mang.
Yeah, i had to use my pliers too. :D
I do believe that all or a substantial majority of Radical Islamists would use violence if they had the means and opportunity.
This is where we differ. I don't for one second entertain the possibility that all 100+ million of them do. It would be very hard to figure out who is a radical militant Islamist or not. Perpetrating acts of violence do not have to be on a large scale. If there are really 180 million who would use, or have used violence to further their cause, there would be far more attacks on Christians, Buddhists, Hindu's etc around the world. It doesn't take infrastructure and means (guns, bombs etc.) to gang up on them, beat them up, brutalize them, burn their homes, lynch them etc.
We have done IMO a great job of using SpecOps and intelligence to damage their ability to do things on a large scale. But everyday violence to the tune of to 5000 per day for 1 act per person every 10 years? No way. that's why, while there may be a large percentage of Militant ones with-in that group its not as large as the "propaganda" would have you believe.
-
Yeah, i had to use my pliers too. :D
This is where we differ. I don't for one second entertain the possibility that all 100+ million of them do. It would be very hard to figure out who is a radical militant Islamist or not. Perpetrating acts of violence do not have to be on a large scale. If there are really 180 million who would use, or have used violence to further their cause, there would be far more attacks on Christians, Buddhists, Hindu's etc around the world. It doesn't take infrastructure and means (guns, bombs etc.) to gang up on them, beat them up, brutalize them, burn their homes, lynch them etc.
We have done IMO a great job of using SpecOps and intelligence to damage their ability to do things on a large scale. But everyday violence to the tune of to 5000 per day for 1 act per person every 10 years? No way. that's why, while there may be a large percentage of Militant ones with-in that group its not as large as the "propaganda" would have you believe.
I didn't say they are committing acts of violence. I said they would if they could. So in that sense, I agree with you that there are not millions of Radical Islamists committing acts of violence.
-
I didn't say they are committing acts of violence. I said they would if they could. So in that sense, I agree with you that there are not millions of Radical Islamists committing acts of violence.
They can any time they want. And if they just did it once (murdered a christian, burned a home, tortured a Buddhist etc.) every 10 years that would be 5000 per day.
I think they support it, Maybe 90% of them, which is just under "as bad" as committing it. But to actually be active is a while different story.
-
They can any time they want. And if they just did it once (murdered a christian, burned a home, tortured a Buddhist etc.) every 10 years that would be 5000 per day.
I think they support it, Maybe 90% of them, which is just under "as bad" as committing it. But to actually be active is a while different story.
I don't know what the worldwide statistics are for violence by Radical Islamists. My comments were focused on the number of them worldwide and the threat they pose to the U.S.
-
They can any time they want. And if they just did it once (murdered a christian, burned a home, tortured a Buddhist etc.) every 10 years that would be 5000 per day.
I think they support it, Maybe 90% of them, which is just under "as bad" as committing it. But to actually be active is a while different story.
where do you get these figures from ? Where is your source of information?
-
you want statistics read this.
http://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/
-
MINORITY ?? Over 70% of Muslims support Sharia Law, 90% support execution of Apostates..
-
I suggest people watch this ..THEY ARE A THREAT TO THE USA
-
you want statistics read this.
http://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/
Do you even know what WordPress is?
WordPress is a blog platform for anyone to use. It's a free down load with free publishing.
http://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/about/ (http://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/about/)
This blog collect and update international statistics, government statistics, newspaper articles and reports related to Muslim immigration and Muslim issues in non-Muslim societies.
Notice the elementary use of grammar?
Perhaps you can post links verifying these stats.
-
where do you get these figures from ? Where is your source of information?
Beach Bum's video.
-
Do you even know what WordPress is?
WordPress is a blog platform for anyone to use. It's a free down load with free publishing.
http://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/about/ (http://muslimstatistics.wordpress.com/about/)
This blog collect and update international statistics, government statistics, newspaper articles and reports related to Muslim immigration and Muslim issues in non-Muslim societies.
Notice the elementary use of grammar?
Perhaps you can post links verifying these stats.
so did you watch the play list? might learn something. I notice you only answer parts here and there.
-
No point in arguing with ozmo.
-
so did you watch the play list? might learn something. I notice you only answer parts here and there.
Not worth it considering the site. I've never been into watching YouTube vids. They are too contrived, manipulative, edited, subjective, unverified etc.
I just like to go with hard data. That way I don't end up accepting false biases or belief based on fear propaganda such as the demonization of reps and dems.
Can you back up those percentage claims from something other then a blog?
-
No point in arguing with ozmo.
i notice he is getting annoyed again, i think he is trying hard to insult me ::). can tell by what he wrote on his post at 06.55. "Notice the elementary use of grammar". what a chopper he is. Actually ozmo your head is really in the Ozone layer ; I speak/write German every day and i admit it crosses over sometimes. Go swallow your Dictionary.
-
Islam is an evil religion.
It has declared eternal violence against all infidels. Its teaching of killing non-believers everywhere they are found is not limited to the times of moohammad in 600 AD, nor to the crusades. It is until the entire world has submitted to Islam.
The fact that that the only assurance of salvation is through martyrdom speaks volumes. Only way to eternal life is by killing others in the name of Allah. Period. Unlike Obama's claim that you can keep your doctor, you can take this fact about Islam to the bank. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't know anything about Islam. Anyone who claims this is not the truth is in denial.
Islam is evil. Period.
-
Islam is an evil religion.
It has declared eternal violence against all infidels. It's teaching of killing non-believers everywhere they are found is not limited to the times of moohammad in 600 AD, nor to the crusades. It is until the entire world has submitted to Islam.
The fact that that the only assurance of salvation is through martyrdom speaks volumes. Only way to eternal life is by killing others in the name of Allah. Period. Unlike Obama's claim that you can keep your doctor, you can take this fact about Islam to the bank. Anyone who says otherwise doesn't know anything about Islam. Anyone who claims this is not the truth is in denial.
Islam is evil. Period.
Exactly correct.
-
i notice he is getting annoyed again, i think he is trying hard to insult me ::). can tell by what he wrote on his post at 06.55. "Notice the elementary use of grammar". what a chopper he is. Actually ozmo your head is really in the Ozone layer ; I speak/write German every day and i admit it crosses over sometimes. Go swallow your Dictionary.
So you cited your own blog? Lol
-
So you cited your own blog? Lol
Is this you ?
-
This is the truth >:(
-
Is this you ?
So now you cant answer simple questions and only resort to ad hom.
Got it.
-
Dead heads trying to Play it down with their soft Islam loving Intellectual Bullshit. They are the fools who are being caught sleeping. Liberal dreamers. Life does not exist in any Book.
-
So now you cant answer simple questions and only resort to ad hom.
Got it.
you Bookworms have no Humor. Looking through older Posts on here you see only your opinion. You seem to have a very elevated opinion of yourself. Comes over as very arrogant.
-
you Bookworms have no Humor. Looking through older Posts on here you see only your opinion. You seem to have a very elevated opinion of yourself. Comes over as very arrogant.
So now you are just joking? ::)
Just attempting to have a discussion with you.
So far you have avoided these questions attacking me with ad-hom
1. Perhaps you can post links verifying these stats.
2. So you cited your own blog?
If you want to discuss this, great. If you don't, but instead want to play school yard games that's fine too. ;)
-
So now you are just joking? ::)
Just attempting to have a discussion with you.
So far you have avoided these questions attacking me with ad-hom
1. Perhaps you can post links verifying these stats.
2. So you cited your own blog?
If you want to discuss this, great. If you don't, but instead want to play school yard games that's fine too. ;)
still have not given me any clear indication of your figures. Like i wrote before you side step questions and then ask a question(very evident in your discussion with Beach Bum). Not clever. To your 2nd question i was pointing out YOUR Observation,Your comment which i find not relevant to the question YOU asked. i suggest you stop trying to side step, read it properly before you write rubbish. The link answers what YOU asked ;)
-
still have not given me any clear indication of your figures. Like i wrote before you side step questions and then ask a question(very evident in your discussion with Beach Bum). Not clever. To your 2nd question i was pointing out YOUR Observation,Your comment which i find not relevant to the question YOU asked. i suggest you stop trying to side step, read it properly before you write rubbish. The link answers what YOU asked ;)
I did. Simply read the exchange of posts between him and I.. I say it about 3 or 4 times, maybe more.
-
I did. Simply read the exchange of posts between him and I.. I say it about 3 or 4 times, maybe more.
like talking to a brick wall ::)
-
like talking to a brick wall ::)
It requires reading a single post. If that's a brick wall for you, don't bother.
-
It requires reading a single post. If that's a brick wall for you, don't bother.
::)
-
::)
yep role your eyes, cause you certainly ain't using them for anything else.
-
yep role your eyes, cause you certainly ain't using them for anything else.
Geez...
-
Geez...
Exactly. You won't take the time to read a post or 2.
-
At some point Donny you are going to need to add some substance to this thread. Because basically as far as i am concerned you are just trolling.
If you don't want to go back a page or 2 a read my posts explaining my views, comment on them, answer some questions that you are being asked, but instead play these games, you can just stay off the thread.
Are you Jack's gimmick?
-
:D
-
:D
;D