Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Hulk-smash! on July 10, 2015, 03:33:26 PM
-
I knew my parent should have moved to Florida when I was in the 7th grade! :'( :'( :'(
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/jennifer-fichter-florida-teacher-sex-article-1.2280215
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/fla-teacher-aide-busted-attempted-sex-boy-11-article-1.2277894
North Carolina too!
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/fla-teacher-aide-busted-attempted-sex-boy-11-article-1.2277894
-
Man, why did this never seem to happen back when I was in school?
-
Sex is a crime in the USA....hope one day their legal system gets rid of fundamentalist religious influences and enters the 21st century
-
Sex is a crime in the USA....hope one day their legal system gets rid of fundamentalist religious influences and enters the 21st century
Yeah, because a 45 year old molesting an 11 year old is just normal everywhere else...
::)
-
Sentenced to 22 tears for having sex with a 17 year old. Oh brother.
-
Sentenced to 22 tears for having sex with a 17 year old. Oh brother.
I wouldn't mind being your cell mate...
-
It's actually good to see pedofemmes getting the same kinds of sentences that their male counterparts get.
And you guys who think that this sort of thing is something to be glorified are what's wrong with the world.
-
Female sex can be consensual or not but all male stiff dick sex is consensual. If you stick something into someone who doesn't want it stuck into them then that's worse than convincing someone to stick something where they weren't going to stick it unless convinced.
I hope this clears up any confusion.
-
Crude but accurate.
-
Put that thing away. It's not gonna happen.
-
Female sex can be consensual or not but all male stiff dick sex is consensual. If you stick something into someone who doesn't want it stuck into them then that's worse than convincing someone to stick something where they weren't going to stick it unless convinced.
I hope this clears up any confusion.
You cant consent if underage.....
-
It's actually good to see pedofemmes getting the same kinds of sentences that their male counterparts get.
And you guys who think that this sort of thing is something to be glorified are what's wrong with the world.
ha, exactly. They all hate feminism and hate when girls get away for hitting guys and get special treatment, etc. But then state that these women, who sleep with underage men, should not get jail time. But men who sleep with underage girls should get jail time.
Can't have it both ways.
-
Female sex can be consensual or not but all male stiff dick sex is consensual. If you stick something into someone who doesn't want it stuck into them then that's worse than convincing someone to stick something where they weren't going to stick it unless convinced.
I hope this clears up any confusion.
That doesn't clear up jack shit.
-
You cant consent if underage.....
Why?
-
That doesn't clear up jack shit.
It means, you can't force a male to have sexual intercourse.
-
i got semi hard reading the article, how many years am i facing?
-
Sentenced to 22 tears for having sex with a 17 year old. Oh brother.
It said " Forced ".
She ain't too bad. I'll imagine just how much she had to force it to a 17year old who is basically drowning in his own testosterone 😀
-
It means, you can't force a male to have sexual intercourse.
And the point of that being? (edit - I see he is referring to a word in the article..)
Plus technically you could force a man...
-
Female sex can be consensual or not but all male stiff dick sex is consensual. If you stick something into someone who doesn't want it stuck into them then that's worse than convincing someone to stick something where they weren't going to stick it unless convinced.
I hope this clears up any confusion.
absolute fucking nonsense...
and I like your use of "convincing" instead of forcing or threatening. I hope you are one of those fat ugly radical feminists with a hair bush and crotch and not a man with cock, balls and a brain.
You're trying to say a man or boy cannot be made to fuck a slore he doesn't want to either from intoxication or otherwise.
The koolaid jar must be damn near empty.
-
The phrase used when a man is forced to fuck something he doesn't want to.
" His cock betrayed him "
-
A Utah teacher not to be outdone by "those trifling ho's down in florida" showed what it means to "carry on an inappropriate relationship".
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3155546/Female-ex-Utah-teacher-36-sexually-abused-three-male-students-tearfully-begs-forgiveness-sentenced-30-years-bars.html
More dumbass kids who are now legends! I'm turnin' green looking at these pics!
* check the dude on the right gettin' a eyeful* :o
-
Sweet Home Alabama!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3155320/Married-teacher-27-confessed-sex-act-17-year-old-student-car-AVOIDS-prison-let-probation-instead.html
-
(http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2015/news/150420/jennifer-fichter-435.jpg)
Gorgeous
-
And the point of that being? (edit - I see he is referring to a word in the article..)
Plus technically you could force a man...
For a man to get an erection and penetrate a woman he has to be aroused which implies a willing participant.
And how can you "technically" force a man to do this?
-
For a man to get an erection and penetrate a woman he has to be aroused which implies a willing participant.
Young lads are full of hormones and as such are quite literally walking hardons. A state of 'arousal' requires little more than consciousness and a pulse.
-
Im more concerned about the fact that its a student and a teacher, as opposed to the boys being 17 years old.
There definitely should be continued punishment for student-teacher relationships. Allowing students and teachers to date or have sex just makes for a weird dynamic in so many ways.
-
Used to be all fair-is-fair/statutory rape/fuck feminists in these instances. But I have a difficult time seeing the abuse or potential PTSD here anymore.
Just lucky kids with shitty, hot teachers (except the second one - ick! Charge that mutt). Obviously unfit for the profession and serious psychological issues, but criminals?
Eh.
-
Young lads are full of hormones and as such are quite literally walking hardons. A state of 'arousal' requires little more than consciousness and a pulse.
You make my point. They WANT to fuk all the time. No one needs to force them.
-
Im more concerned about the fact that its a student and a teacher, as opposed to the boys being 17 years old.
There definitely should be continued punishment for student-teacher relationships. Allowing students and teachers to date or have sex just makes for a weird dynamic in so many ways.
Yes, that is the issue: student/teacher. I think it should be more of a workforce policy issue than a criminal one. I don't think these women belong in jail.
-
You make my point. They WANT to fuk all the time. No one needs to force them.
Make no mistake – I would have throughly fucked raw, and probably fallen in love with this braod when I was in my early teens.
'Rape' me, bitch.... PLEASE -
(http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2015/news/150420/jennifer-fichter-435.jpg)
-
Man, why did this never seem to happen back when I was in school?
It did happen back in the day, the teachers just didn't pick u
-
This chick screams sex! If I was a super horny 16 yr old boy in her classroom I'd pitchin' a jeans rippin' tent all damn day. A tight skrt, those glasses & sky high cheekbones would make it absolutely impossible to think of anything but pile-drivin' her like a freakin' jackhammer. BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM!!!
This MILF lost everything for some young dick. Her job, her marriage, her daughter, her freedom EVERYTHING! I wonder if she'll be joining PRISONPENPALS.COM soon after being locked-up? I'll keep an eye out for her.
-
The "victims" parents (the mom) remain unforgiving, she get 22 years in prison and the kid remains unaffected while getting high fives and "atta boys" from his friends and probably some of the male teachers. What's the matter with this picture?
-
You make my point. They WANT to fuk all the time. No one needs to force them.
irrelevant
17 yo girls are super sexual also - but that doesn't make it OK for teachers to do this
-
Look, I don't have a problem with these sort of women in high schools, but not in the capacity of teachers.
There should be a prostitute building where they can work, and the horny underage boys can access them there if they have a letter of permission from their parents ;D
-
irrelevant
17 yo girls are super sexual also - but that doesn't make it OK for teachers to do this
Totally relevant. A male has to be sexually aroused and have an erection and make a concerted act to have intercourse. He cannot be forced. A girl can be force to have intercourse regardless whether she wants to or not.
The question for the purpose of our discussion is not whether or not it's OK but can a man be forced to have sex.
-
Look, I don't have a problem with these sort of women in high schools, but not in the capacity of teachers.
There should be a prostitute building where they can work, and the horny underage boys can access them there if they have a letter of permission from their parents ;D
That is a separate and valid issue.
-
For a man to get an erection and penetrate a woman he has to be aroused which implies a willing participant.
Whether one participates willingly isn't the question. Whether one can consent is.
And how can you "technically" force a man to do this?
Are you going to ask us how to roofie someone next?
-
Whether one participates willingly isn't the question. Whether one can consent is.
OK, lets address that issue. Do you believe a 17 year old can consent to sex? I am not talking legally here. I'm talking real life. Can a 17 decide for himself whether he wants to have sex or not?
Are you going to ask us how to roofie someone next?
I don't understand this comment at all. Are you implying the teacher drugged the student 30 different times without his knowledge so she can have sex with him?
-
OK, lets address that issue.
Let's!
Do you believe a 17 year old can consent to sex?
In jurisdictions where the age of consent is 17, yes. In states where the age of consent is 18, no.
I am not talking legally here.
Too bad, because that's the only context which matters in this instance.
I'm talking real life.
You realize that laws exist in "real life" right?
Can a 17 decide for himself whether he wants to have sex or not?
I'll venture to say that the average 17-year old can. But that's the wrong question. The question is whether that choice implies consent. In states where the age of consent is 18, the decision doesn't imply consent.
-
Let's!
In jurisdictions where the age of consent is 17, yes. In states where the age of consent is 18, no.
Too bad, because that's the only context which matters in this instance.
You realize that laws exist in "real life" right?
I'll venture to say that the average 17-year old can. But that's the wrong question. The question is whether that choice implies consent. In states where the age of consent is 18, the decision doesn't imply consent.
OK, I'm wasting my time here. "You realize that laws exist in "real life" right?" Good one.
The issue is whether or not certain laws are justified. A woman is sentenced to over 20 years for having sex with a 17 year old. Prostitution is illegal but if I film the act and post it on the internet then it's OK. Only fifteen years ago the age of consent in Hawaii was 13.
But the law is the law. Whatever it says is carved in stone and don't you dare think for yourself or question. Say that to the Same Sex marriage proponents.
It's sheep like you that allowed the goliathon government that wants to control literally every aspect of our lives to thrive.
Don't waste my time.
Dismissed.
-
OK, I'm wasting my time here. "You realize that laws exist in "real life" right?" Good one.
The issue is whether or not certain laws are justified. A woman is sentenced to over 20 years for having sex with a 17 year old. Prostitution is illegal but if I film the act and post it on the internet then it's OK. Only fifteen years ago the age of consent in Hawaii was 13.But the law is the law. Whatever it says is carved in stone and don't you dare think for yourself or question. Say that to the Same Sex marriage proponents.
It's sheep like you that allowed the goliathon government that wants to control literally every aspect of our lives to thrive.
Don't waste my time.
Dismissed.
Basile kicking himself
-
Basile kicking himself
LOL! But in all fairness most 13 year olds are sporting the body of a 14 year old.
-
LOL! But in all fairness most 13 year olds are sporting the body of a 14 year old.
Vatican city is 12 years old.
-
Vatican city is 12 years old.
I had pubes at 12 and would have agreed, i.e., consented (regardless of what the law says) to brutally bang my 6th grade teacher appropriately called a lay teacher because she taught at a Catholic school but wasn't a nun.
And, yes, I was perfectly able to make those decisions for myself at 12 just like the law now allows 11 year olds to get birth control pills and abortions without parental consent.
-
Pellius, what's the number for your babysitting service again?
-
This chick screams sex! If I was a super horny 16 yr old boy in her classroom I'd pitchin' a jeans rippin' tent all damn day. A tight skrt, those glasses & sky high cheekbones would make it absolutely impossible to think of anything but pile-drivin' her like a freakin' jackhammer. BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM!!!
This MILF lost everything for sone young dick. Her job, her marriage, her daughter, her freedom EVERYTHING! I wonder if she'll be joining PRISONPENPALS.COM soon after being locked-up? I'll keep an eye out for her.
Dude, calm down
-
Man, why did this never seem to happen back when I was in school?
Word.
-
Make no mistake – I would have throughly fucked raw, and probably fallen in love with this braod when I was in my early teens.
'Rape' me, bitch.... PLEASE -
(http://img2-2.timeinc.net/people/i/2015/news/150420/jennifer-fichter-435.jpg)
LMAO!
-
(http://static2.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2280220.1435908751!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/article-fichter-4-0702.jpg)
She enjoyed it.
-
Oopps i did it again...
(http://static1.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2280219.1435908722!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/article-fichter-3-0702.jpg)
-
Let's!
In jurisdictions where the age of consent is 17, yes. In states where the age of consent is 18, no.
Too bad, because that's the only context which matters in this instance.
You realize that laws exist in "real life" right?
I'll venture to say that the average 17-year old can. But that's the wrong question. The question is whether that choice implies consent. In states where the age of consent is 18, the decision doesn't imply consent.
Ever think the law just sometimes maybe gets it wrong?
-
Ever think the law just sometimes maybe gets it wrong?
I've already proven this fella doesn't think for himself. He's just part of the herd that lets the government tell him what to think.
-
Man, why did this never seem to happen back when I was in school?
Trust me that it did and has been happening for ages. I know of a few teachers who were whores in high school. I was banging an elementary school teacher when I was in high school. It just didn't make the news as it does today.
-
This chick screams sex! If I was a super horny 16 yr old boy in her classroom I'd pitchin' a jeans rippin' tent all damn day. A tight skrt, those glasses & sky high cheekbones would make it absolutely impossible to think of anything but pile-drivin' her like a freakin' jackhammer. BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM-BAM!!!
This MILF lost everything for some young dick. Her job, her marriage, her daughter, her freedom EVERYTHING! I wonder if she'll be joining PRISONPENPALS.COM soon after being locked-up? I'll keep an eye out for her.
This ^ chick is PLAYBOY centerfold material. Hopefully one of those very lucky boys took a few pics while doggy-stylin' her fine ass.
-
I've already proven this fella doesn't think for himself. He's just part of the herd that lets the government tell him what to think.
He's a smart guy, no doubt. Just like him to address the question, if he hasn't already.
-
The issue is whether or not certain laws are justified. A woman is sentenced to over 20 years for having sex with a 17 year old. Prostitution is illegal but if I film the act and post it on the internet then it's OK. Only fifteen years ago the age of consent in Hawaii was 13.
Sure. Plenty of laws are stupid. Nobody's arguing against that. That doesn't mean they shouldn't be followed. There's a process through which laws are changed.
But the law is the law. Whatever it says is carved in stone and don't you dare think for yourself or question. Say that to the Same Sex marriage proponents.
I'm quite happy to debate whether the law should be different. But that doesn't change the fact that the law is what it currently is and that the boy in question could not legally consent.
It's sheep like you that allowed the goliathon government that wants to control literally every aspect of our lives to thrive.
That's a funny think to say to someone who's extremely libertarian.
The
Don't waste my time.
Dismissed.
(http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/200/420/BRTky.jpg?1321408042)
I had pubes at 12 and would have agreed, i.e., consented (regardless of what the law says) to brutally bang my 6th grade teacher appropriately called a lay teacher because she taught at a Catholic school but wasn't a nun.
And, yes, I was perfectly able to make those decisions for myself at 12 just like the law now allows 11 year olds to get birth control pills and abortions without parental consent.
Let's assume that you, at 12, were able to consent because... well... pubes. What are you trying to suggest? That the law should decide consent based on whether one has pubes? Here's the simple fact: the crux of your argument is that "erection = consent" and that is bullshit. If someone has priapism does that mean that a woman can jump on and ride him with abandom and the sex is consensual? What about someone who is severely mentally retarded? What about chemically or artificially induced erections? What about someone who gets an erection while asleep? Are you seriously suggesting that erection = consent?
-
(http://static2.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2280220.1435908751!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/article-fichter-4-0702.jpg)
She enjoyed it.
She's laughing because it's absurd that she has to go to jail for rocking some teen boys socks
-
Ever think the law just sometimes maybe gets it wrong?
Sure - plenty of times. Maybe even in this particular instance too. But that doesn't mean we should disregard the law. We should work, within the framework established, to get such laws changed.
-
Sure - plenty of times. Maybe even in this particular instance too. But that doesn't mean we should disregard the law. We should work, within the framework established, to get such laws changed.
I guess I can't disagree.
-
Sentenced to 22 tears for having sex with a 17 year old. Oh brother.
+1
What a strange country America seems to be. Pretty much the rest of the developed world 17 would be above the legal age to have sex.
Sure the teacher did wrong in abusing a position of trust but 22yrs for that is beyond ridiculous
-
As much as I lust for this women now when I was in JR and HS I thought the 20something teachers looked old. I preferred cheerleaders.
As far as the laws they should be even handed for men and women.
These women are nuts especially when they keep it up out on bail. It is an epidemic with them even going after prepubescent boys!
-
(http://static2.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.2280220.1435908751!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_635/article-fichter-4-0702.jpg)
She enjoyed it.
Isn't 'fichter' German slang for 'fucker?'
-
That's a funny think to say to someone who's extremely libertarian.
No, you are not.
Are you seriously suggesting that erection = consent?
No, but taking that erection and shoving it in someone's hole is.
-
No, you are not.
My whole worldview... shattered... :'( Some dude on the Internet says I'm not a libertarian. And I had just gotten the t-shirt!!!
No, but taking that erection and shoving it in someone's hole is.
So, since to you the only criterion is whether one pushes their cock in a hole, someone with an IQ of 50 - around the intelligence of the average babboon - can give meaningful consent by virtue of sticking his erect penis in a hole? Do I have that right?
-
What about the 99.99% of boners that don't belong to priapistic, drugged, mental defectives?
And I swear to God if you split up that sentence and answer it in multiple parts I'm gonna fucking lose it!
-
My whole worldview... shattered... :'( Some dude on the Internet says I'm not a libertarian. And I had just gotten the t-shirt!!!
So, since to you the only criterion is whether one pushes their cock in a hole, someone with an IQ of 50 - around the intelligence of the average babboon - can give meaningful consent by virtue of sticking his erect penis in a hole? Do I have that right?
Now it's become "the only" criterion. You sure like to put words in other people's mouth.
Oh brother. You are a complete moron!
And you are no Libertarian no matter what you want to call yourself or what shirt you wear.
Please die.
-
What about the 99.99% of boners that don't belong to priapistic, drugged, mental defectives?
And I swear to God if you split up that sentence and answer it in multiple parts I'm gonna fucking lose it!
It's just so utterly astounding how many truly mental retards with no capacity for rational thinking are on this board. Creeps like him need to have his boner cut into multiple parts to keep him from breeding and spreading his retarded DNA.
-
Yeah high school teachers have been doing this with the underage students for decades. Like perverts let loose in the candy store when the owner is away. I'm sure the teachers here who would dare tell the truth would admit it. But teachers are very secretive about their "pedophile clubs".
-
What about the 99.99% of boners that don't belong to priapistic, drugged, mental defectives?
It depends. Someone who's drunk off their rocker can't reasonably consent, even if he "decides" he wants to fuck. A 12 year old may be unusually mature and wise beyond his years, but generally 12 year olds aren't capable of consenting.
And I swear to God if you split up that sentence and answer it in multiple parts I'm gonna fucking lose it!
I tried my best not to!
-
Now it's become "the only" criterion. You sure like to put words in other people's mouth.
I asked you: "Are you seriously suggesting that erection = consent?" and you answered: "No, but taking that erection and shoving it in someone's hole is." You are the one that said that, given an erection, the only relevant criterion here shoving one's dick in a hole. You made it the only criterion. Words have meaning.
Oh brother. You are a complete moron!
And what does that make you? Arguing with a moron seems somewhat moronic, no?
And you are no Libertarian no matter what you want to call yourself or what shirt you wear.
At least I still have great biceps.
Please die.
Since you said plea... no.
-
What about the 99.99% of boners that don't belong to priapistic, drugged, mental defectives?
And I swear to God if you split up that sentence and answer it in multiple parts I'm gonna fucking lose it!
Once again: :)
-
Question on the boner angle: Don't female rape victims naturally lubricate as well?
Otherwise, the legal consent thing just seems so iffy to me with younger males. Case by case might make a little more sense, but what do I know.
-
it is a crime but to send someone to jail for a period of 22 years for this? Absolutely ridiculous.
People get less for murder in many other countries.
-
22 years in prison for letting 3 filthy teenagers pound her? Fuck you could murder 3 people in the uk and be out in 22 year
-
I tried my best not to!
-
God DAMMIT!!!!
-
newsflash underage women "consent" and seek out sex
but it sure as hell is illegal and immoral
erection or arousal is irrelevant
-
newsflash underage women "consent" and seek out sex
but it sure as hell is illegal and immoral
erection or arousal is irrelevant
not to some of the members here..
-
erection is irrelevant
Maybe you're not using it right?
-
Maybe you're not using it right?
a women can sit on a little boy's erection and before he knows it he has shot his load in her...
-
Maybe you're not using it right?
Mutherfucker.
Stop that shit, it's just wasted here.
-
I do find that Americans seem to see years like months where jail time is concerned.
I know its TV but I watch the courtroom drama "Law and Order" where the solicitors give them a plea bargain offer, on a guilty they are looking at 75 years and they go guilty on a 30 years to life plea bargain like its a good deal FFS.
You may as well take your chances in court
-
Mutherfucker.
Stop that shit, it's just wasted here.
I was gonna give him The Dad Talk! ;D
-
Yeah high school teachers have been doing this with the underage students for decades. Like perverts let loose in the candy store when the owner is away. I'm sure the teachers here who would dare tell the truth would admit it. But teachers are very secretive about their "pedophile clubs".
Please stop diminishing the very real mental sickness of pedophilia with POST pubescent teens. I can't believe how many people on this board are utterly clueless as to the definition of pedophilia.
My sister has been a high school teacher for 27 years. I just asked her about the "pedophilia club" and she just laughed. Of course, she's just being secretive. Are you a teacher?
-
It depends. Someone who's drunk off their rocker can't reasonably consent, even if he "decides" he wants to fuck. A 12 year old may be unusually mature and wise beyond his years, but generally 12 year olds aren't capable of consenting.
I tried my best not to!
But they can consent to an abortion and birth control pills without the parents being notified.
How did you get to be so stupid?
-
I asked you: "Are you seriously suggesting that erection = consent?" and you answered: "No, but taking that erection and shoving it in someone's hole is." You are the one that said that, given an erection, the only relevant criterion here shoving one's dick in a hole. You made it the only criterion. Words have meaning.
And what does that make you? Arguing with a moron seems somewhat moronic, no?
At least I still have great biceps.
Since you said plea... no.
And exactly where did I say having an erection is the ONLY criteria?
Show me those exact words: "only criteria"
"And what does that make you?" What are you? 12 years old?
And no, you don't have great biceps anymore than you are a Libertarian.
-
Question on the boner angle: Don't female rape victims naturally lubricate as well?
Otherwise, the legal consent thing just seems so iffy to me with younger males. Case by case might make a little more sense, but what do I know.
My sister was raped and no she was not aroused and no she did not "lubricate". She was too busy screaming for help.
-
newsflash underage women "consent" and seek out sex
but it sure as hell is illegal and immoral
erection or arousal is irrelevant
The whole point of the arousal and consent issue was the charge, which somehow got lost in the discussion and what I'm addressing, that the 17 year old student was "forced" into sex with the teacher. Forced over thirty times to be specific.
I hope that clears up why I think axvo is such a retard with no reasoning ability. He claims that a 17 year old can be force over thirty times, thirty fucking times, to have sex with the same women.
-
newsflash underage women "consent" and seek out sex
but it sure as hell is illegal and immoral
erection or arousal is irrelevant
According to......?
-
According to......?
The social paradigm we currently live in
The collection of social opinion at large
You will be hard pressed to find people who consider underage sex OK. If any it will be a minority, and yes I have read the pro-underage consenting arguments. I don't agree with them.
-
The social paradigm we currently live in
The collection of social opinion at large
You will be hard pressed to find people who consider underage sex OK. If any it will be a minority, and yes I have read the pro-underage consenting arguments. I don't agree with them.
You would have been hard pressed to find anyone saying homosexuality was acceptable 60 yeras ago in the UK
-
You would have been hard pressed to find anyone saying homosexuality was acceptable 60 yeras ago in the UK
Thats true
Although consenting adults is an entirely different discussion.
-
Please stop diminishing the very real mental sickness of pedophilia with POST pubescent teens. I can't believe how many people on this board are utterly clueless as to the definition of pedophilia.
My sister has been a high school teacher for 27 years. I just asked her about the "pedophilia club" and she just laughed. Of course, she's just being secretive. Are you a teacher?
no i'm not, but i know several (one of my closest friends is a teacher and i have teachers in the family), and they have been quite honest with me
when the recent (last 10 years or so) crackdowns started a LOT of teachers were shitting themselves
plus i have known several people who fucked the teachers...
-
You would have been hard pressed to find anyone saying homosexuality was acceptable 60 yeras ago in the UK
pinning all your hopes on new "age laws" aren't you..
are you also a muslim or muslim sympathiser?
-
And exactly where did I say having an erection is the ONLY criteria?
Show me those exact words: "only criteria"
You very clearly said that, given an erection, all that matters is whether one willingly shoved that erection into a hole. These are your words, not mine. And words have meaning. If you don't like what you said, then don't blame me. Blame yourself.
"And what does that make you?" What are you? 12 years old?
I'm rubber you're glue...
And no, you don't have great biceps anymore than you are a Libertarian.
Thanks for informing me. What other misconceptions have I been laboring under?
But they can consent to an abortion and birth control pills without the parents being notified.
Well, except I never said that they can or should.
How did you get to be so stupid?
::)
The whole point of the arousal and consent issue was the charge, which somehow got lost in the discussion and what I'm addressing, that the 17 year old student was "forced" into sex with the teacher. Forced over thirty times to be specific.
I hope that clears up why I think axvo is such a retard with no reasoning ability. He claims that a 17 year old can be force over thirty times, thirty fucking times, to have sex with the same women.
Except that's not what I claimed, and it's a silly move to suggest that I did, given that my posts are visible and everyone here can go back, read them and realize that you are lying through your teeth.
I'll save you the trouble of looking up what I wrote: "Whether one participates willingly isn't the question. Whether one can consent is." You then asked me whether a 17 year old can consent to sex, and I responded with: "In jurisdictions where the age of consent is 17, yes. In states where the age of consent is 18, no." You said you weren't talking "legally" and I responded with "Too bad, because that's the only context which matters in this instance."
Oh, and would you like some ketchup to go with your foot?
-
no i'm not, but i know several (one of my closest friends is a teacher and i have teachers in the family), and they have been quite honest with me
plus i have known several people who fucked the teachers...
Yes you are. By equating an act of pedophilia, having sexual intercourse with a seven year old, with an underage sex, having sexual intercourse with a 13-17 year old diminishes the very real pathology that is pedophilia.
And as far as your teacher pedophile club. Where the hell do you live? My sister has worked in virtually every school district in Hawaii and never heard of such thing. And I live in a State where the age of consent was 13 years old just 15 years ago.
-
Yes you are.
when i said that, i meant "no i'm not" a teacher
-
Yes you are. By equating an act of pedophilia, having sexual intercourse with a seven year old, with an underage sex, having sexual intercourse with a 13-17 year old diminishes the very real pathology that is pedophilia.
I don't want to diminish that. But teachers who take advantage of their position regardless of the age of said HS student are scum. It is like letting a friend into your house who screws your UA daughter while you are not there..
And as far as your teacher pedophile club. Where the hell do you live? My sister has worked in virtually every school district in Hawaii and never heard of such thing. And I live in a State where the age of consent was 13 years old just 15 years ago.
the stuff i know about mostly happened in 80's and early 90's - over 20 years ago
but your example of your sister just shows she is "out of the loop" on this particular matter - because clearly it is STILL happening A LOT, at least where female teachers are concerned..
-
It depends. Someone who's drunk off their rocker can't reasonably consent, even if he "decides" he wants to fuck.
Afraid this is where MLK's "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws" comes into play. Passed-out drunk, fine, I'll play along. Bad-decision drunk, 'Yes Means Yes' and all: Fuuuuuuuuck that. We're all this kinda rapist, at some point, so were our girlfriends and/or wives.
Retarded feminist bullshit. Chicks screw drunk guys just as much as the opposite, yet they will never be charged, and everyone knows it. More special interest, one-way nonsense, like Hate Crimes. Fuck that.
In this case, man-hating, 'after-the-fact' regret, like that stupid whore at Columbia. Law is too stupid here to be respected.
-
I don't want to diminish that. But teachers who take advantage of their position regardless of the age of said HS student are scum. It is like letting a friend into your house who screws your UA daughter while you are not there..
the stuff i know about mostly happened in 80's and early 90's - over 20 years ago
but your example of your sister just shows she is "out of the loop" on this particular matter - because clearly it is STILL happening A LOT, at least where female teachers are concerned..
As a teacher for nearly 30 years in various school districts and serving on various boards, with most of her close friends being teachers, I doubt she is out of the loop.
And yes, it is clearly still happening -- but a lot? Depends how you look at it. For example, it's been estimated that 2% of girls have sex by the time they are 13 years old. Now 2% doesn't seem like a lot. But 2% out of a million and you are already at 20,000 girls. Now that's a lot.
The percentage of student teacher sex as a percentage I believe is quite small. But it may seem large in real numbers. I mean, if you claim that this has always been happening then more of us just on this board alone would have heard about it. But that isn't the case. That's why the typical response is "Where were these teachers when I was a kid?"
So far it's only you. Again, it makes me wonder where you lived and went to school where this was so common place.
More to the point: do you think a 17 year old male can be FORCED to have sex with this very attractive women over 30 times as claimed by axv?
-
Afraid this is where MLK's "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws" comes into play. Passed-out drunk, fine, I'll play along. Bad-decision drunk, 'Yes Means Yes' and all: Fuuuuuuuuck that. We're all this kinda rapist, at some point, so were our girlfriends and/or wives.
I personally wouldn't fuck a "bad decision drunk" chick, and not because I'd fear legal repercussions when she sobered up. But to each their own, I guess.
Retarded feminist bullshit. Chicks screw drunk guys just as much as the opposite, yet they will never be charged, and everyone knows it. More special interest, one-way nonsense, like Hate Crimes. Fuck that.
You're conflating multiple things here.
In this case, man-hating, 'after-the-fact' regret, like that stupid whore at Columbia. Law is too stupid here to be respected.
What a case that is! I hope that he at least wins the case in Court, although that will be a small victory given everything he's been through.
-
Afraid this is where MLK's "One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws" comes into play. Passed-out drunk, fine, I'll play along. Bad-decision drunk, 'Yes Means Yes' and all: Fuuuuuuuuck that. We're all this kinda rapist, at some point, so were our girlfriends and/or wives.
Retarded feminist bullshit. Chicks screw drunk guys just as much as the opposite, yet they will never be charged, and everyone knows it. More special interest, one-way nonsense, like Hate Crimes. Fuck that.
In this case, man-hating, 'after-the-fact' regret, like that stupid whore at Columbia. Law is too stupid here to be respected.
And doesn't being drunk lower inhibitions meaning that your "yes" is more of a real "yes".
And doesn't the concept of "asking for trouble" mean anything anymore? I mean, if I leave a wad of cash on my car seat with my door unlocked and windows open it doesn't give anybody the right to steal it but, come on, a little common sense please.
That girl who walked into the dressing room all by herself after the Letterman show while Snoop and his crew were getting plastered was just asking for trouble.
-
Thats true
Although consenting adults is an entirely different discussion.
the law says who is a consenting adult not morality.
In 50 years time you may be the one labelled as a bigot just as the people back in the 40s are now seen for banning homosexuality
-
the law says who is a consenting adult not morality.
In 50 years time you may be the one labelled as a bigot just as the people back in the 40s are now seen for banning homosexuality
BING-fuking-OH!
And in fifty years we will be looked on as animal oppressors keeping dogs on leashes and referring to ourselves as their "masters".
Like I said in Hawaii the age of consent use to be 13 only fifteen years ago. So you went from being consider legal to being a pedo by the stroke of some bureaucrat's pen.
BTW, it's still 13 in Japan.
-
BING-fuking-OH!
And in fifty years we will be looked on as animal oppressors keeping dogs on leashes and referring to ourselves as their "masters".
Like I said in Hawaii the age of consent use to be 13 only fifteen years ago. So you went from being consider legal to being a pedo by the stroke of some bureaucrat's pen.
BTW, it's still 13 in Japan.
Whats the current rate of exchange on Yen?
-
Whats the current rate of exchange on Yen?
thinking of relocating?
-
You're conflating multiple things here.
Conflated purposefully due to their similarity, as each targets a specific group: namely, males and white males. Both single out a politically-safe perp.
Feminists now have ammunition that will never be used against women, and non-whites have what will rarely - if ever - be used against them.
-
thinking of relocating?
How did I know that one of the staunch advocates of following the law would throw that one in.
I had a debate on another forum where some people were all for kicking suspected pedos to death in the street.
Amazingly it was only those people that thought a child dancing in a video was disgusting and provocative.
-
Whats the current rate of exchange on Yen?
Two school girls and one pre op tranny.
-
it is a crime but to send someone to jail for a period of 22 years for this? Absolutely ridiculous.
People get less for murder in many other countries.
Weren't the young men all 17yo?
-
Weren't the young men all 17yo?
She was only charged for 3, I'd imagine she's fucked way more who aren't saying a thing.
-
https://www.facebook.com/MensRightsAndOutreachServices/posts/451976174964250 (https://www.facebook.com/MensRightsAndOutreachServices/posts/451976174964250)
For anyone who thinks male victims of pedofemmes are "lucky."
-
https://www.facebook.com/MensRightsAndOutreachServices/posts/451976174964250 (https://www.facebook.com/MensRightsAndOutreachServices/posts/451976174964250)
For anyone who thinks male victims of pedofemmes are "lucky."
When I was in high school I jerked off to the thought of sex with some of the teachers, It would have been like winning the lottery if this had actually happened, I wouldn't be crying about it on Facebook years later like these fags. Fuckers probably had a compensation claim and need to keep up the victim act
-
I admit that a 13yo kid having sex with a grown woman might cause some emotional trauma, but when a kid is 16 or 17, and IF is consensual, give me a break; both enjoy it.